The mGlu5 receptor antagonists MPEP and MTEP attenuate behavioral signs of morphine withdrawal and morphine-withdrawal-induced activation of locus coeruleus neurons in rats

N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists have been demonstrated to suppress the signs of opiate withdrawal; however, side effects limit their clinical use. Since the metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) 5 receptor has been shown to affect glutamate release and modulate NMDA receptor function, we examined the effects of two selective mGlu5 receptor antagonists, 2-methyl-6-(phenyl-ethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP) and 3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine (MTEP), on morphine withdrawal. Pretreatment with MPEP or MTEP (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly attenuated behavioral signs of morphine withdrawal. Specifically, both MPEP and MTEP attenuated the occurrence/severity of chews, digging, salivation, and weight loss, and increased the occurrence of erections. Neither compound changed the occurrence of wet-dog shakes, ptosis, irritability, or lacrimation. Both MPEP and MTEP produced a modest, but significant, attenuation of morphine-withdrawal-induced activation of locus coeruleus neurons in anesthetized rats. These results indicate a role for mGlu5 receptors in morphine withdrawal and suggest the potential for mGlu5 antagonists in the treatment of withdrawal from opiates and other drugs of abuse.     

Anxiolytic-like effects of MTEP, a potent and selective mGlu5 receptor agonist does not involve GABA(A) signaling

Several lines of evidence suggest a crucial involvement of glutamate in the mechanism of action of anxiolytic drugs including the involvement of group I metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors. Given the recent discovery of a selective and brain penetrable mGlu5 receptor antagonists, the effect of 3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]-pyridine (MTEP), i.e. the most potent mGlu5 antagonist, was evaluated in established models of anxiety after single or repeated administration. We also studied if the anxiolytic effect of MTEP is mediated by mechanism involving the GABA-benzodiazepine (BZD) receptor complex. Experiments were performed on male Wistar rats or male Albino Swiss mice. The anxiolytic-like effects of MTEP were tested in the conflict drinking test and the elevated plus-maze test in rats as well as in the four-plate test in mice. MTEP (0.3-3.0 mg/kg) induced anxiolytic-like effects in the conflict drinking test (after single and repeated administration) and in the elevated plus-maze test in rats. In the four-plate test in mice, it exerted anxiolytic activity at a dose of 20 mg/kg. MTEP had no effect on the locomotor activity of animals. The anxiolytic-like effect of MTEP was not changed by BZD antagonist flumazenil. Moreover, a synergistic interaction between non-effective doses of MTEP and diazepam was observed in the conflict drinking test. These data suggest that selective mGlu5 receptor antagonists mediated anxiolysis is not dependent on GABA-ergic system and that these agents may play a role in the therapy of anxiety.     

Analgesic effects of mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptor antagonists in the rat formalin test

mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptors have been implicated in pain associated with inflammation. In the present study, the formalin test was used to measure sustained pain with components of tissue injury. The aims of the present study were to assess: (i) the role of mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptors in inflammatory pain using selective antagonist EMQMCM, 1.25-5 mg/kg, as the mGlu1 receptor antagonist, and MPEP or MTEP, 2.5-10 mg/kg, as mGlu5 receptor antagonist; (ii) the possible interaction between mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptor antagonists and morphine; and (iii) whether tolerance develops to the analgesic effects of these antagonists after prolonged treatment. EMQMCM, MTEP and MPEP significantly reduced the manifestation of both phases of formalin response. However, all these mGlu receptor antagonists did not affect the withdrawal latencies in a model of acute pain (Hargreaves test), which has a different underlying mechanism. In the present study, the suppressive effect on formalin-induced pain behaviour was much stronger when mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptor antagonists were co-injected compared to administration of a single antagonist, but this effect was not seen when mGlu receptor antagonist was co-administered with morphine. This is in contrast to the pronounced inhibitory effects after co-treatment with morphine and the uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist memantine. The present study also provides the first direct in vivo evidence that prolonged administration of MTEP (5 mg/kg) over 7 days leads to the development of tolerance to its antinociceptive effects. Such tolerance was not observed when EMQMCM (5 mg/kg) was administered in the same manner. In conclusion, these results provide additional arguments for the role of group I mGlu receptors in pain with inflammatory conditions.     

The role of group I mGlu receptors in the expression of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and ethanol withdrawal seizures in rats

In animal models, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors antagonists inhibit physical dependence and the reinforcing effects of ethanol. The group I metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors antagonists (mGlu1 and mGlu5) attenuate excitatory effect of glutamate by functional modulation of the glutamate/NMDA receptors. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of a selective mGlu5 receptors antagonist—MTEP, and mGlu1 receptors antagonist—EMQMCM, on two processes relevant to alcohol addiction: the expression of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm, and ethanol withdrawal audiogenic seizures in rats. Our experiments indicated that EMQMCM at the doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg, and MTEP at the doses of 2.5 and 5 mg/kg, significantly attenuated the expression of ethanol CPP. Furthermore, both group I mGlu receptor antagonists, i.e. EMQMCM at the dose of 10 mg/kg and MTEP at the dose of 5 mg/kg, attenuated audiogenic seizures induced by the sound stimulus 12 h after withdrawal of ethanol in dependent rats. Our study shows the importance of mGlu5 and mGlu1 receptors for the expression of ethanol-induced CPP and withdrawal seizures, although mGlu5 receptors antagonist (MTEP) was more potent than the antagonist of mGlu1 receptors (EMQMCM).     

Preconditioning with acute and chronic lithium administration reduces ischemia/reperfusion injury mediated by cyclooxygenase not nitric oxide synthase pathway in isolated rat heart

The aim of the present study was to determine whether various glutamate receptor antagonists could affect ethanol withdrawal-induced anxiety-like behavior measured in the elevated plus-maze test in rats. In our study, memantine (8 and 12 mg/kg), a noncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, did not show any effect on ethanol withdrawal anxiety. Acamprosate (NMDA and metabotropic glutamate5 (mGlu5) receptor antagonist), at a dose of 400 mg/kg showed anxiolytic-like effect, thus increasing the percent of time spent in open arms and open arms entries. Antagonists of group I mGlu receptors, such as MTEP ([(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl) ethynyl] pyridine, mGlu5 receptor) or EMQMCM (3-ethyl-2-methyl-quinolin-6-yl-(4-methoxy-cyclohexyl)-methanone methanesulfonate, mGlu1 receptor), caused similar effects to acamprosate. In contrast to acamprosate and MTEP, EMQMCM (5 mg/kg) elevated the ethanol withdrawal-induced decrease in locomotion. When given alone to the saline-treated group, EMQMCM indicated anxiolytic-like effect. Our results imply a crucial role of mGlu5 receptor in an anxiety-like effect of ethanol withdrawal because MTEP (a selective mGlu5 receptor antagonist) and acamprosate (which also indirectly inhibits mGlu5 receptor) attenuated ethanol withdrawal anxiety-like behavior without influence on ethanol withdrawal hypolocomotion and did not show any effect in the saline-treated groups. However, difference in anxiolytic-like potency between both these group I mGlu receptors antagonists may be due to the recent experimental design. Therefore, taking into account a positive correlation between ethanol withdrawal-induced anxiety and relapse to ethanol drinking, our results suggest that mGlu receptor antagonists of group I (similarly to acamprosate) could prevent relapse to drinking and, therefore they might be useful in therapy of alcoholism.     

The mGlu5 receptor antagonist MTEP attenuates opiate self-administration and cue-induced opiate-seeking behaviour in mice

The mGlu5 receptor (mGluR5) has been implicated in the rewarding effect of various drugs of abuse and drug-seeking behaviour. In the present study we investigated the impact of antagonism of mGluR5 with the selective negative allosteric, modulator 3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine (MTEP) on operant self-administration of morphine as well as cue-induced drug-seeking in adult CD1 mice. Administration of MTEP (20 mg/kg, i.p.) attenuated operant responding for morphine (0.1 mg/kg/infusion) and cue-induced morphine-seeking after a period of forced abstinence. Collectively, these data implicate mGluR5 in the reinforcing effects of opiates and support the proposition that mGluR5 is a potential therapeutic target for treatment of drug addiction.     

Comparison of the effects of mGluR1 and mGluR5 antagonists on the expression of behavioral sensitization to the locomotor effect of morphine and the morphine withdrawal jumping in mice

The aim of the present study was to compare the influence of group I metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) antagonists (mGluR1 and mGluR5) on the expression of sensitization to the locomotor effect of morphine. We also tested how these compounds affect the morphine withdrawal jumps in mice. In our study, the mGluR1 antagonist EMQMCM [3-ethyl-2-methyl-quinolin-6-yl-(4-methoxy-cyclohexyl)-methanone methanesulfonate] and the mGluR5 antagonist MTEP ([(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl) ethynyl] pyridine) were used. Sensitization was induced by five intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of morphine at the dose of 10 mg/kg, every 3 days. Morphine dependence was induced by subcutaneous (s.c.) implantation of pellets containing 37.5 mg of morphine base for three days. Our data indicate that pretreatment with EMQMCM (5, 10, 20 mg/kg) and MTEP (5, 10 mg/kg) on the challenge day, inhibited the expression of sensitization to the locomotor effect of morphine in mice. Antagonists of both subtypes of the group I mGlurs given alone, did not modify the acute locomotor effect of morphine. On the other hand, EMQMCM did not attenuate the morphine withdrawal jumps precipitated by naloxone (4 mg/kg). The results suggest that both subtypes of the group I mGluRs (mGluR1 and mGluR5) take part in the expression of morphine sensitization processes but mGluR1 is not involved in the expression of morphine withdrawal jumps in mice. These findings may have implications for the treatment of opiate addiction in future.     

The antidepressant-like action of mGlu5 receptor antagonist, MTEP, in the tail suspension test in mice is serotonin dependent

Rationale

Numerous studies indicate the potential antidepressant actions of several mGlu5 receptor antagonists, including 3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]-pyridine (MTEP). The explanation for the mechanism of these effects might be a key step in finding new antidepressant drugs (AD).

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible role of the serotonergic system in the antidepressant-like activity of MTEP in the tail suspension test (TST) in C57BL/6J mice, using selected antagonists of serotonergic receptors and by applying two different methods of serotonin (5-HT) depletion.

Results

The results of our studies showed that the mGlu5 receptor antagonist, MTEP, similar to the fluoxetine used as reference AD, did not induce antidepressant-like effects in mice pretreated with tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor, para-chlorophenylalanine. On the other hand, MTEP worked as a potential AD in the TST in mice fed on a tryptophan-free (TRP-free) diet for 3 weeks. However, fluoxetine, which was used as a reference control was also active in this experiment, suggesting that a TRP-free diet was not sufficiently effective in reducing the 5-HT level. Furthermore, we showed that the 5HT2A/2C antagonist, ritanserin, yet not the 5-HT1A antagonist, WAY100635, 5HT1B antagonist, SB224289 or 5HT4 antagonist, GR125487, reversed the antidepressant-like effects of MTEP in the TST. Finally, a sub-effective dose of MTEP co-administered with a sub-effective dose of citalopram induced an antidepressant-like effect in the TST in mice.

Conclusion

The results of our studies suggest the involvement of serotonergic system activation in the antidepressant-like effects of the mGlu5 antagonist, MTEP, in the TST in mice.     

mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptor antagonists lack anticonvulsant efficacy in rodent models of difficult-to-treat partial epilepsy

Modulation of metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors represents an interesting new approach for the treatment of a range of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Several lines of evidence suggest that functional blockade of group I (mGlu1 and mGlu5) receptors may be beneficial for treatment of epileptic seizures. This study was conducted to investigate whether mGlu1 or mGlu5 receptor antagonists have the potential to block partial or secondarily generalized seizures as occurring in partial epilepsy, the most common and difficult-to-treat type of epilepsy in patients. For this purpose, we systemically administered novel highly selective and brain penetrable group I mGlu receptor antagonists, i.e., the mGlu1 receptor antagonist EMQMCM [3-ethyl-2-methyl-quinolin-6-yl-(4-methoxy-cyclohexyl)-methanone methanesulfonate] and the mGlu5 receptor antagonist MTEP ([(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl) ethynyl] pyridine), at doses appropriate for mGlu1 or mGlu5 receptor-mediated effects in rodent models of partial seizures. Two models were used: the 6-Hz electroshock model of partial seizures in mice and the amygdala-kindling model in rats. Clinically established antiepileptic drugs were included in the experiments for comparison. Antiepileptic drugs exerted significant anticonvulsant effects in both models, while EMQMCM and MTEP were ineffective in this regard, although both compounds were administered up to doses associated with essentially full receptor occupancy and with typical mGlu receptor-mediated effects in rodent models of anxiety or pain. Brain microdialysis for determining extracellular levels of MTEP following i.p. administration in rats substantiated that effective brain concentrations were reached at times of our experiments in seizure models. The present results do not support a significant anticonvulsant potential of group I mGlu receptor antagonists in rodent models of difficult-to-treat partial epilepsy.     

The behavioral profile of the potent and selective mGlu5 receptor antagonist 3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine (MTEP) in rodent models of anxiety.

Previous reports have demonstrated the anxiolytic effect of the potent and systemically active metabotropic glutamate subtype 5 (mGlu5) receptor antagonist 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP) in rodents. Here, we present evidence for the anxiolytic activity of a novel mGlu5 receptor antagonist, 3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine (MTEP), in rats and compare its profile to the benzodiazepine receptor agonist diazepam. MTEP occupied mGlu5 receptors in a dose-dependent manner with essentially full receptor occupancy at the highest dose tested (10 mg/kg, i.p.). At doses appropriate for mGlu5 receptor-mediated effects, MTEP significantly reduced fear-potentiated startle and increased punished responding in a modified Geller-Seifter conflict model consistent with an anxiolytic-like profile. In both models, the magnitude of the anxiolytic-like response was similar to that seen with diazepam. In contrast, MTEP decreased unpunished responding to a lesser extent than diazepam and had no effect on rotarod performance when administered either alone or in combination with ethanol. Repeated dosing with MTEP in this model eliminated the increase in punished responding observed with acute dosing. The present results suggest that mGlu5 receptor antagonists lack the side effects seen with benzodiazepines, such as sedation and ethanol interaction, and provide insight into a possible role for mGlu5 receptor antagonists in the modulation of mood disorders.     

Effects of mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptor antagonists on negatively reinforced learning

Effects on aversive learning of the novel highly selective mGlu5 receptor antagonist [(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine (MTEP) and mGlu1 receptor antagonist (3-ethyl-2-methyl-quinolin-6-yl)-(4-methoxy-cyclohexyl)-methanone methanesulfonate (EMQMCM) were tested, after systemic administration, in the passive avoidance (PA) and fear potentiated startle (FPS) paradigms. Both MTEP at 10 mg/kg and EMQMCM at 5 and 10 mg/kg, given 30 min before training, impaired acquisition of the passive avoidance response (PAR). Co-administration of MTEP and EMQMCM at doses ineffective when administered alone, produced anterograde amnesia when given 30 min before the acquisition phase. Neither EMQMCM (5 mg/kg) nor MTEP (10 mg/kg) impaired retention of the PAR after direct post-training injections. EMQMCM (5 mg/kg), but not MTEP (10 mg/kg) blocked the PAR when given 30 min before testing. Pre-training administration of MTEP at doses of 2.5 and 5 mg/kg inhibited fear conditioning in the FPS when tested 24 h later. In contrast, EMQMCM was ineffective. Our findings suggest diverse involvement of mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptors in negatively reinforced learning.     

Anxiolytic-like effects of mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptor antagonists in rats

The purpose of the present study was to compare anxiolytic activity of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGlu) antagonist, EMQMCM ((3-ethyl-2-methyl-quinolin-6-yl)-(4-methoxy-cyclohexyl)-methanone methanesulfonate) and the mGlu5 receptor antagonist MTEP ([(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine) and MPEP (2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine) in animal models of anxiety. In the elevated plus maze, diazepam (1 mg/kg), but not the mGlu1 or mGlu5 receptor antagonists induced anxiolytic-like effects. Meanwhile, MTEP (2.5 and 5 mg/kg), EMQMCM (5 mg/kg), and diazepam (2 mg/kg) all significantly inhibited fear potentiated startle. In the contextual fear conditioning test, MTEP (1.25 and 2.5 but not 5 mg/kg) and EMQMCM (0.6 to 5 mg/kg) attenuated freezing responding. In the Geller-Seifter conflict test, MPEP (1 and 3 mg/kg), MTEP (3 mg/kg), chlordiazepoxide (10 and 20 mg/kg) and midazolam (1 mg/kg) all facilitated punished responding, while ECMQCM failed to produce any significant effects up to 3 mg/kg dose. To summarise, the present data further support a significant anxiolytic potential of group I mGlu receptor antagonists, while suggesting the effects of mGlu1 receptor antagonists may depend on the experimental procedure and may be qualitatively different from those of mGlu5 receptor antagonists.     

Assessing the role of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in multiple nociceptive modalities

Preclinical data, performed in a limited number of pain models, suggest that functional blockade of metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors may be beneficial for pain management. In the present study, effects of 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP), a potent, selective mGlu5 receptor antagonist, were examined in a wide variety of rodent nociceptive and hypersensitivity models in order to fully characterize the potential analgesic profile of mGlu5 receptor blockade. Effects of 3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine (MTEP), as potent and selective as MPEP at mGlu5/mGlu1 receptors but more selective than MPEP at N-methyl-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, were also evaluated in selected nociceptive and side effect models. MPEP (3-30 mg/kg, i.p.) produced a dose-dependent reversal of thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia following complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced inflammatory hypersensitivity. Additionally, MPEP (3-30 mg/kg, i.p.) decreased thermal hyperalgesia observed in carrageenan-induced inflammatory hypersensitivity without affecting paw edema, abolished acetic acid-induced writhing activity in mice, and was shown to reduce mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia observed in a model of post-operative hypersensitivity and formalin-induced spontaneous pain. Furthermore, at 30 mg/kg, i.p., MPEP significantly attenuated mechanical allodynia observed in three neuropathic pain models, i.e. spinal nerve ligation, sciatic nerve constriction and vincristine-induced neuropathic pain. MTEP (3-30 mg/kg, i.p.) also potently reduced CFA-induced thermal hyperalgesia. However, at 100 mg/kg, i.p., MPEP and MTEP produced central nerve system (CNS) side effects as measured by rotarod performance and exploratory locomotor activity. These results suggest a role for mGlu5 receptors in multiple nociceptive modalities, though CNS side effects may be a limiting factor in developing mGlu5 receptor analgesic compounds.     

Transcriptional profiling of the rat frontal cortex following administration of the mGlu5 receptor antagonists MPEP and MTEP

The development of selective type 5 metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGlu5) antagonists, such as 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP) and 3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]-pyridine (MTEP), has revealed an important role for these receptors in various disorders of the nervous system including depression, anxiety, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, drug addiction, and alcoholism. In this study, we used microarray technology to examine changes in gene expression induced by repeated administration of the mGlu5 antagonists MPEP and MTEP. Male Wistar rats (n=5 per treatment group) were administered MPEP (10 mg/kg), MTEP (10 mg/kg) or vehicle intraperitoneally twice daily for 5 days. Approximately 30 min following the final drug administration, rats were sacrificed and frontal cortices were then dissected and examined for changes in gene expression by cDNA microarray analysis. Changes in gene expression with p-values less than 0.01 were considered to be statistically significant. The expression of 63 genes was changed by both MPEP and MTEP, with 58 genes down-regulated and 5 genes up-regulated. Quantitative PCR verified the magnitude and direction of change in expression of 9 of these genes (r2=0.556, p=0.017). Pathway analysis revealed that many of the biological processes altered by repeated MPEP and MTEP treatment were related to ATP synthesis, hydrolase activity, and signaling pathways associated with mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). Our results demonstrate diverse effects of MPEP and MTEP gene expression in the frontal cortex, and these results may help elucidate the mechanisms by which these compounds produce beneficial effects in animal models of various disorders of the central nervous system.     

Potential anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects of MPEP, a potent, selective and systemically active mGlu5 receptor antagonist

1. Several lines of evidence suggest a crucial involvement of glutamate in the mechanism of action of anxiolytic and/or antidepressant drugs. The involvement of group I mGlu receptors in anxiety and depression has also been proposed. Given the recent discovery of a selective and brain penetrable mGlu5 receptor antagonists, the effect of 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP), i.e. the most potent compound described, was evaluated in established models of anxiety and depression. 2. Experiments were performed on male Wistar rats or male Albino Swiss or C57BL/6J mice. The anxiolytic-like effects of MPEP was tested in the conflict drinking test and the elevated plus-maze test in rats as well as in the four-plate test in mice. The antidepressant-like effect was estimated using the tail suspension test in mice and the behavioural despair test in rats. 3. MPEP (1 - 30 mg kg(-1)) induced anxiolytic-like effects in the conflict drinking test and the elevated plus-maze test in rats as well as in the four-plate test in mice. MPEP had no effect on locomotor activity or motor coordination. MPEP (1 - 20 mg kg(-1)) did shorten the immobility time in a tail suspension test in mice, however it was inactive in the behavioural despair test in rats. 4. These data suggest that selective mGlu5 receptor antagonists may play a role in the therapy of anxiety and/or depression, further studies are required to identify the sites and the mechanism of action of MPEP.     

Functional interaction of NMDA and group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in negatively reinforced learning in rats

Rationale The role of glutamatergic system in learning and memory has been extensively studied, and especially N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors have been implicated in different learning and memory processes. Less is known, however, about group I metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors in this field. Recent studies indicated that the coactivation of both NMDA and group I mGlu receptors is required for the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) and learning. Objective The purpose of the study is to evaluate if there is a functional interaction between NMDA and group I mGlu receptors in two different models of aversive learning. Methods Effects of NMDA, mGlu1, and mGlu5 receptor antagonists on acquisition were tested after systemic coadministration of selected ineffective doses in passive avoidance (PA) and fear-potentiated startle (FPS). Results Interaction in aversive learning was investigated using selective antagonists: (3-ethyl-2-methyl-quinolin-6-yl)-(4-methoxy-cyclohexyl)-methanone methanesulfonate (EMQMCM) for mGlu1, [(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine (MTEP) for mGlu5, and (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzocyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate [(+)MK-801] for NMDA receptors. In PA, the coapplication of MTEP at a dose of 5 mg/kg and (+)MK-801 at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg 30 min before training impaired the acquisition tested 24 h later. Similarly, EMQMCM (2.5 mg/kg) plus (+)MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg), given during the acquisition phase, blocked the acquisition of the PA response. In contrast, neither the combination of MTEP (1.25 mg/kg) nor EMQMCM (5 mg/kg) plus (+)MK-801 (0.05 mg/kg) was effective on the acquisition assessed in the FPS paradigm. Conclusion The findings suggest differences in the interaction of the NMDA and mGlu group I receptor types in aversive instrumental conditioning vs conditioning to a discrete light cue.     

Anxiolytic-like action of MTEP expressed in the conflict drinking Vogel test in rats is serotonin dependent

The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the anxiolytic-like action of a selective and brain penetrable group I metabotropic glutamate (mGlu5) receptor antagonist 3-[(2-methyl-1,3-tiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]-pyridine (MTEP) is dependent upon the serotonergic system. Experiments were performed on male Wistar rats. The Vogel conflict drinking test was used to detect anxiolytic-like activity. MTEP administered intraperitoneally at doses of 1, 3 and 6 mg/kg induced anxiolytic-like effect. The potential anxiolytic effect of MTEP (1 mg/kg) was inhibited by a nonselective 5-HT receptor antagonist metergoline (2 mg/kg i.p.) and 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist ritanserin (0.5 mg/kg i.p.), but not by a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist N-{2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl}-N-(2-pyridynyl)cyclohexane-carboxamide (WAY 100635) (0.1 mg/kg i.p). The anxiolytic effect of MTEP (6 mg/kg) was attenuated by ritanserin (1 mg/kg i.p.). Moreover, MTEP-induced a dose-dependent release of serotonin in the frontal cortex. The obtained results suggest that the potential anxiolytic effect of the mGlu5 receptor antagonist MTEP is due to the increased serotonin release with subsequent activation of 5-HT2A/2C receptors, most probably located postsynaptically, but not by the 5-HT1A receptors.     

Blockade of the mGlu5 receptor decreases basal and stress-induced cortical norepinephrine in rodents

Rationale Glutamate, the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain mediates its effects by both ionotropic and metabotropic receptor subtypes. Recently, the search for selective ligands for glutamate receptor subtypes has led to the discovery of 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP), an antagonist specific for metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5). This receptor is highly expressed in limbic forebrain regions and is thought to modulate anxiety-related processes. The noradrenergic nucleus locus coeruleus (LC) is an important mediator of stress responses and dysfunction of this system is implicated in affective disorders such as anxiety and depression.Objectives We sought to assess the effects of mGlu5 receptor antagonists, MPEP and 3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine (MTEP) on cortical norepinephrine (NE) levels.Methods In vivo microdialysis and high-pressure liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC-ED) were used to assess the effects of mGlu5 antagonism on extracellular NE in the frontal cortex, a major terminal field of the LC.Results Blockade of the mGlu5 receptor elicited significant reductions in extracellular NE in the frontal cortex. The benzodiazepine diazepam also reduced cortical NE. Furthermore, MPEP administration attenuated stress-induced increases in extracellular NE.Conclusions Taken together, these data show that MPEP and MTEP, through their blockade of the mGlu5, reduce extracellular norepinephrine, the impact of which may contribute to their anxiolytic actions.     

NMDA but not AMPA glutamatergic receptors are involved in the antidepressant-like activity of MTEP during the forced swim test in mice

Several lines of evidence suggest an antidepressant-like activity for 3-[(methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]-pyridine (MTEP), a highly selective, non-competitive antagonist of metabotropic glutamate receptors subtype 5 (mGluR(5)). This effect has been observed following both acute and chronic MTEP treatments in behavioral tests and experimental models of depression, such as the forced swim test (FST), the tail suspension test, and the olfactory bulbectomy model of depression. However, the mechanism of action for mGluR(5) antagonists remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the antidepressant-like action of MTEPis dependent on ionotropic glutamatergic receptors. Male Albino Swiss mice were used, and antidepressant-like activity was evaluated using the FST. The antidepressant-like effect of MTEP (0.3 mg/kg) was significantly antagonized by pre-treatment with the NMDA receptor agonist N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA, 75 mg/kg, i.p.). The AMPA receptor antagonist NBQX (10 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect the MTEP activity. Our results indicate that the antidepressant-like activity of MTEP in the FST involves NMDA but not AMPA receptors and suggest that the interaction between mGluR(5) and NMDA receptors plays an important role in the underlying antidepressant mechanism(s).     

Effect of glutamate receptor antagonists on place aversion induced by naloxone in single-dose morphine-treated rats

The neurobiological mechanism underlying the negative motivational component of withdrawal from acute opiate dependence is far from understood. Our objectives were to determine whether the glutamatergic system is involved in the motivational component of morphine withdrawal in acutely dependent rats and such an involvement is associated with dopaminergic neurotransmission. We examined the effects of various kinds of glutamate receptor antagonists on conditioned place aversion (CPA) induced by naloxone-precipitated withdrawal from a single morphine exposure 24 h before. Furthermore, the influence of pretreatment with the dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol on those effects of glutamate receptor antagonists was also investigated. CPA was attenuated in a dose-dependent manner by all glutamate receptor antagonists examined including the NMDA receptor antagonists (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclo-hepten-5,10-imine maleate (MK-801) and phencyclidine hydrochloride (PCP), AMPA receptor antagonist 1-(4-aminophenyl)4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine hydrochloride (GYKI 52466), and metabotropic receptor antagonists (+/-)-2-amino-3-phosphonopropionic acid (AP-3) and (+/-)-alpha-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (MCPG). The effects of MK-801, GYKI 52466 and MCPG were blocked by haloperidol.These results suggest that the glutamatergic system involving multiple classes of receptors plays a role in the motivational component of withdrawal from acute morphine dependence, and the function of the glutamatergic system would be closely associated with dopaminergic neurotransmission.