Clinical Development of Ixabepilone and Other Epothilones in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Chemotherapy efficacy in patients with solid tumors is influenced by primary and acquired multidrug resistance (MDR). Epothilones represent a novel class of microtubule inhibitors with lower susceptibility to drug resistance and efficacy in taxane‐resistant tumors. While other epothilones are currently under investigation, ixabepilone is the first epothilone B analogue approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Ixabepilone has been shown to have preclinical activity in chemotherapy‐sensitive and chemotherapy‐resistant tumor models, and synergistic antitumor activity with other chemotherapeutic and targeted agents. Single‐agent ixabepilone has demonstrated clinical activity in multiple solid tumors including advanced breast, lung, prostate, pancreatic, renal cell, and ovarian cancers. Most notably, efficacy has been demonstrated in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing after treatment with anthracyclines and taxanes. A phase III trial in anthracycline‐ and taxane‐resistant MBC showed superior disease control with ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine monotherapy, resulting in its approval. Ixabepilone is also active in chemotherapy‐naïve and taxane‐resistant hormone‐refractory prostate cancer and platinum‐resistant non‐small cell lung cancer. Neutropenia and peripheral sensory neuropathy are the most common adverse events associated with treatment. This review discusses the challenges of MDR and the data that support the use of epothilones in this setting, focusing on ixabepilone.     

Ixabepilone: a novel antineoplastic agent with low susceptibility to multiple tumor resistance mechanisms

Tumor resistance to chemotherapeutic agents ultimately leads to treatment failure in the majority of cancer patients. The identification of new agents that are less susceptible to mechanisms of tumor resistance could, therefore, bring significant clinical benefits to patients with advanced cancer. One new drug class of great interest in this respect is the epothilones and their analogues, which are microtubule inhibitors with low susceptibility to several mechanisms of drug resistance. Ixabepilone is an analogue of natural epothilone B with activity against a wide range of tumor types, including drug-resistant tumors. This is consistent with the preclinical activity of ixabepilone against human cancer cell lines resistant to taxanes and other agents. Taxane resistance in these cells may be acquired or primary and results from several mechanisms, such as overexpression of multidrug-resistance proteins and the betaIII-tubulin isoform. Ixabepilone has demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy or in combination with capecitabine in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated/resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and has recently been approved for use in resistant/refractory MBC. Other epothilones, such as patupilone, KOS-1584, and ZK-EPO, are also being evaluated in drug-resistant cancers. Ixabepilone represents a new treatment option for MBC patients with cancers resistant to available chemotherapeutic agents.     

Ixabepilone: clinical role in metastatic breast cancer

Ixabepilone has shown promising clinical data in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and may be particularly valuable in patients showing progression after treatment with standard chemotherapy. This article reviews the developing clinical profile of ixabepilone in MBC. Unlike taxanes and anthracyclines, ixabepilone has low susceptibility to multiple mechanisms of tumor cell resistance and has activity against tumors resistant to taxanes and/or anthracyclines. In phase II studies, single-agent ixabepilone resulted in objective response rates ranging from 11.5% to 57% in patients who had locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, including patients who were treated as first-line therapy or in resistant patients who had received multiple lines of previous treatment. In two large phase III studies in women who had locally advanced or MBC pretreated with or resistant to taxanes and/or anthracyclines, a combination of ixabepilone plus capecitabine was superior to capecitabine alone in terms of progression-free survival and response rates. The efficacy of ixabepilone has also been shown in subsets, including patients with poor prognosis, the first-line metastatic setting, and in triple-negative disease. Studies are underway to investigate this agent in combination with biologics. A recent three-arm study has shown the activity and tolerability of ixabepilone plus bevacizumab; however, comparative data are not yet available. The toxicity profile of ixabepilone is generally manageable and predictable. The most common adverse events associated with ixabepilone include peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia. Ixabepilone appears to offer a promising alternative chemotherapeutic agent for patients with MBC who progress on various taxanes, anthracyclines, and capecitabine.     

晚期乳腺癌紫杉类耐药及其新型抗微管治疗

紫杉类药物原发性或继发性耐药已成为不可避免的棘手难题.伊沙匹隆对经多线治疗包括紫杉类耐药的乳腺癌患者有效.艾日布林用于治疗接受过二线以上化疗的晚期乳腺癌患者.新型抗微管药物有望成为既往接受过紫杉类药物标准化疗的晚期乳腺癌患者的有效方案.     

Metformin in early breast cancer: a prospective window of opportunity neoadjuvant study

Taxanes are a standard first-line option for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but their utility may be limited by primary or acquired resistance. New microtubule-targeting agents have been developed to overcome taxane resistance and provide additional options for improving patient outcomes. This article reviews these alternative microtubule-targeting agents and their potential clinical benefits for MBC patients. Relevant clinical data were compiled through searches within PubMed and congress abstract databases. Ixabepilone, a novel microtubule-stabilizing drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), has proven efficacy across multiple lines of therapy, including patients with taxane-resistant/refractory disease. In phase III trials, ixabepilone plus capecitabine significantly improved progression-free survival compared with capecitabine alone in anthracycline/taxane-pretreated patients. Eribulin has recently been approved by the FDA and by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of patients with MBC who have received at least two prior chemotherapy regimens for late-stage disease. In a phase III trial, eribulin extended overall survival compared with the physician's treatment choice in heavily pretreated MBC patients. In addition, several investigational microtubule-targeting agents may have therapeutic potential in MBC. The development of new microtubule-targeting agents helps to address the need for additional effective regimens for patients progressing after standard treatment with anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimens.     

Ixabepilone, first in a new class of antineoplastic agents: the natural epothilones and their analogues

Although targeted therapies are becoming increasingly important in oncology, cytotoxic agents are likely to remain a valuable element in the treatment paradigm of cancer. However, resistance to chemotherapy is a major obstacle to the successful treatment of cancer. Therefore, there is a need for novel antineoplastic agents that are able to overcome mechanisms of tumor resistance. Drugs that target microtubules, including paclitaxel and docetaxel, are among the most commonly prescribed anticancer therapies. However, the utility of taxane-based therapies is limited by difficulties with formulation, administration, and resistance induced by P-glycoprotein. The epothilones and their analogues are a novel class of antimicrotubule agents that has demonstrated antitumor activity in the setting of resistance. These antimicrotubule agents are structurally unrelated to the taxanes, with a distinct beta-tubulin-binding mode. Ixabepilone is a rationally designed, semisynthetic analogue of natural epothilone B, which displays reduced susceptibility to a range of common tumor resistance mechanisms. Promising phase II activity and a manageable safety profile with ixabepilone have been seen in a wide range of tumor types, including heavily pretreated/resistant and early-stage breast cancer. Moreover, encouraging phase III results with ixabepilone and capecitabine for patients with breast cancer have recently been presented. Clinical trials are also planned for ixabepilone in combination with targeted agents, such as trastuzumab and bevacizumab. Ixabepilone is likely to be the first available drug in its class, with the potential to bring clinical benefit to patients with a wide range of malignancies.     

Ixabepilone plus capecitabine for breast cancer patients with an early metastatic relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy: two clinical trials

BackgroundDespite recent advances in treating patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), outcomes remain poor. Ixabepilone is a semisynthetic analogue of epothilone B with low susceptibility to multiple mechanisms of tumor-cell resistance. This review examined the results of 2 phase III clinical trials of ixabepilone in patients with drug-resistant or heavily pretreated, locally advanced breast cancer or MBC.Patients and MethodsIn both studies, women with locally advanced breast cancer or MBC pretreated with, or resistant to, taxanes or anthracyclines were randomly assigned to ixabepilone plus capecitabine, or capecitabine alone, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.ResultsIxabepilone plus capecitabine significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine alone. The median PFS was prolonged by 1.5 months and 1.8 months in the 2 studies (hazard ratio, < 0.8 in both studies; P ≥ .001). These observations remained valid within several patient subsets: those receiving ixabepilone as first-line therapy, those with taxane-resistant disease, and those with particularly poor prognostic features. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared with capecitabine in patients with symptomatic disease (12.3 vs. 9.5 months, respectively; P = .015). Peripheral neuropathy with ixabepilone was generally reversible and was effectively managed by dosage reduction in most patients. Ixabepilone did not exacerbate capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome or diarrhea.ConclusionThe results of these 2 large phase III trials suggest that ixabepilone plus capecitabine may improve treatment outcomes for patients with locally advanced breast cancer or MBC resistant to, or heavily pretreated with, taxanes or anthracyclines, even in those with poor prognostic features.     

Optimizing ixabepilone treatment schedules in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer

The epothilone B analog, ixabepilone, demonstrates low susceptibility to drug resistance mechanisms and has demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy in patients refractory to other chemotherapeutic options. Ixabepilone is approved by the FDA for treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing after taxanes and anthracyclines, either in combination with capecitabine or as monotherapy if the patient has already progressed on capecitabine. Ixabepilone is generally well tolerated at the approved dose and administration schedule of 40 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. The most commonly observed dose-limiting adverse events (AEs) associated with ixabepilone are myelosuppression and peripheral neuropathy. Dose modification including dose reduction and dosing schedule modification may be utilized to manage toxicities, but this must be based on careful hematologic, neurologic, and liver function monitoring. Other ixabepilone dose schedules are being evaluated to further improve the risk/benefit profile. Weekly and daily schedules of ixabepilone have shown useful efficacy and reasonable tolerability. A recent phase II trial compared the tolerability of ixabepilone dosed once weekly (16 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle) or every 3 weeks (40 mg/m(2) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle) in patients with MBC. Preliminary data showed that both dosing schedules had an acceptable safety profile; however, more AEs were reported in patients receiving ixabepilone every 3 weeks. Ixabepilone is also being evaluated in combination with other anticancer agents (e.g., bevacizumab and lapatinib), in earlier breast cancer settings and in other indications.     

Treatment beyond taxanes,emerging new cytotoxic agents

Until recently, taxanes were considered the first choice of therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the clinical utility of the taxanes is limited in some patients by the emergence of drug resistance. Moreover, these agents are increasingly used as adjuvant therapy, increasing the population of patients with prior exposure once the disease has metastasised. Current approved treatment options after prior taxane therapy include capecitabine, liposomal doxorubicin and nab-paclitaxel – as single agents and/or in combination. Vinorelbine and gemcitabine may also be used. Most recently, the epothilones, a novel group of microtubule-stabilising agents, have shown promising activity in patients with MBC, including those resistant to taxanes and other cytotoxic drugs. Currently, three epothilone B synthetic derivatives, ixabepilone (BMS-247550), patupilone (EPO906), and sagopilone (ZK-EPO) are in development. This article will examine the latest data for these next-generation cytotoxics in the treatment of MBC.     

Clinical experience with epothilones in patients with breast cancer

The search for novel chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of breast cancer with lower susceptibility to resistance mechanisms than current agents has led to the discovery of the epothilones and their analogues. Epothilones stabilize microtubules in a manner similar to taxanes but are structurally distinct. Ixabepilone, an epothilone B analogue, having demonstrated high antimicrotubule activity in preclinical studies, has shown notable efficacy in phase II trials in patients with early-stage and metastatic breast cancer. Of particular note, single-agent ixabepilone is effective in tumors resistant to anthracyclines, taxanes, and capecitabine, for which there is currently no recommended therapy. Different mechanisms of action and the non-overlapping toxicities of ixabepilone with other agents provide the rationale for ixabepilone in combination as a valid therapeutic approach. Phase II results assessing ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients are promising. The investigation of ixabepilone in the neoadjuvant setting has also revealed potential biomarkers to predict ixabepilone response. Ixabepilone has demonstrated activity in patients with tumors that are estrogen receptor-, progesterone receptor-, and HER2-negative. The safety profile throughout the trials has been manageable, with peripheral neuropathy as one of the more notable adverse events, which has been mostly reversible. A phase III trial comparing ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone demonstrated significant prolongation of median progression-free survival and reduction in relapse risk. Additionally, other members of the epothilone family, such as patupilone, ZK-EPO, BMS-310705, and KOS-862, have demonstrated efficacy against breast cancer in phase I clinical trials. Ongoing phase II/III trials continue to assess ixabepilone and other members of the epothilone family in breast cancer, particularly in combination regimens, as being valid treatment options in multidrug-resistant breast cancer.     

Activity of ixabepilone in oestrogen receptor-negative and oestrogen receptor-progesterone receptor-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer

Oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer, including oestrogen receptor-, progesterone receptor- and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER/PR/HER2-negative) breast cancer, is more aggressive than ER-positive disease. A major limitation in the treatment of ER-negative disease subtypes is the inherent insensitivity to hormonal agents (tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors) that are widely used in the treatment of breast cancer. Thus, therapeutic options for poor prognosis patients with ER-negative breast cancer are limited to a handful of chemotherapeutic agents, and new agents are needed to improve the treatment of this disease.Ixabepilone, a novel epothilone B analogue with low susceptibility to cellular mechanisms that confer resistance to taxanes and other chemotherapeutic agents, has demonstrated potent preclinical antitumour activity in multiple models, including those with primary or acquired drug resistance. This review summarises the results of a prospective subset analysis from a phase III clinical trial evaluating ixabepilone for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), in which efficacy and safety were evaluated in patients with ER-negative and ER/PR/HER2-negative disease.     

Synergistic activity of ixabepilone plus other anticancer agents: preclinical and clinical evidence

Ixabepilone demonstrates marked synergistic activity in combination with capecitabine, which served as the rationale for the evaluation of this combination in the clinic. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine is currently approved for patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing after treatment with an anthracycline and a taxane; approval was based on the results of two phase III trials comparing the combination with capecitabine monotherapy. An array of preclinical studies in multiple solid tumor types show that ixabepilone demonstrates therapeutic synergy with targeted therapies including trastuzumab, bevacizumab, brivanib, and cetuximab; with immune-modulating agents such as anti-CTLA-4 antibody; and with other chemotherapy drugs such as irinotecan and epirubicin. Notably, experiments in several xenograft models show that ixabepilone provides greater antitumor synergism when combined with bevacizumab than either paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab. These preclinical findings provide a foundation for ongoing phase II clinical trials using ixabepilone in combination with trastuzumab or lapatinib in HER2-positive breast cancer; with bevacizumab in breast cancer, endometrial cancer, renal cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); with cetuximab in breast cancer, NSCLC, and pancreatic cancer; and with brivanib, dasatinib, sorafinib, sunitinib, or vorinostat in MBC. Preliminary results from several of these trials suggest that ixabepilone-based combinations have promising anticancer activity.     

A retrospective evaluation of second-line chemotherapy response in hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma: second line taxane-based therapy after first-line epothilone-B analog ixabepilone (BMS-247550) therapy

BACKGROUND: Epothilones and taxanes interfere with microtubule function. Ixabepilone, which is an epothilone-B analog, has activity against taxane-resistant cell lines and as first-line therapy for men with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma (HRPC). Clinical cross-resistance of ixabepilone and taxanes in HRPC is unknown. METHODS: Records were evaluated retrospectively from patients with HRPC who were treated on a randomized Phase II trial of ixabepilone with or without estramustine and who subsequently received taxane chemotherapy. Posttherapy declines in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and time to PSA progression were defined by consensus criteria. The median survival was evaluated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients who received ixabepilone with estramustine (28 patients) or without estramustine (21 patients) subsequently received second-line taxane therapy. Second-line PSA declines > or = 50% were achieved by 51% of patients (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 33-66%). Second-line PSA declines > or = 50% were achieved by 61% of patients (95% CI, 42-78%) who achieved a first-line PSA decline > or = 50% with ixabepilone, compared with 33% of patients (95% CI, 13-59%) who did not (P = 0.08). Patients who discontinued first-line ixabepilone treatment for disease progression were less likely to achieve a PSA decline > or = 50% in response to second-line, taxane-based therapy compared with patients who discontinued for toxicity or patient preference (36% vs. 71%; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Second-line taxane chemotherapy after ixabepilone resulted in a substantial frequency of PSA declines. Although patients with ixabepilone-refractory disease were less likely to respond to second-line taxane chemotherapy, 36% did achieve a PSA response. These findings were consistent with incomplete clinical cross-resistance between the taxanes and the epothilones.     

Efficacy and safety of ixabepilone (BMS-247550), a novel epothilone B analogue

The epothilones are a new class of non-taxane tubulin polymerization agents obtained by natural fermentation of the myxobacteria Sorangium cellulosum. The cytotoxic activities of the epothilones, like those of the taxanes, have been linked to stabilization of microtubules, but they also have important differences. Among the epothilone family, ixabepilone (BMS247550) is a semisynthetic derivative of the natural product epothilone B. Ixabepilone was evaluated in vivo in a panel of human and rodent tumour models, the majority of which were chosen because of their known, well-characterized resistance to paclitaxel, and seems able to overcome the over-expression of multidrug resistance and to be unaffected by mutations in the beta tubulin gene. The interest of ixabepilone was clinically confirmed in clinical studies of phase II which demonstrated a strong activity at the patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to taxanes and in patients suffering of other types of chemoresistant tumors.     

Preclinical discovery of ixabepilone, a highly active antineoplastic agent

The epothilones and their analogs constitute a novel class of antineoplastic agents, produced by the myxobacterium Sorangium cellulosum. These antimicrotubule agents act in a similar manner to taxanes, stabilizing microtubules and resulting in arrested tumor cell division and apoptosis. Unlike taxanes, however, epothilones and their analogs are macrolide antibiotics, with a distinct tubulin binding mode and reduced susceptibility to a range of common tumor resistance mechanisms that limit the effectiveness of taxanes and anthracyclines. While natural epothilones A and B show potent antineoplastic activity in vitro, these effects were not seen in preclinical in vivo models due to their poor metabolic stability and unfavorable pharmacokinetics. A range of epothilone analogs was synthesized, therefore, with the aim of identifying those with more favorable characteristics. Here, we describe the preclinical characterization and selection of ixabepilone, a semi-synthetic epothilone B analog, among many other epothilone analogs. Ixabepilone demonstrated superior preclinical characteristics, including high metabolic stability, low plasma protein binding and low susceptibility to multidrug resistance protein-mediated efflux, all of which were predictive of potent in vivo cell-killing activity. Ixabepilone also demonstrated in vivo antitumor activity in a range of human tumor models, several of which displayed resistance to commonly used agents such as anthracyclines and taxanes. These favorable preclinical characteristics have since translated to the clinic. Ixabepilone has shown promising phase II clinical efficacy and acceptable tolerability in a wide range of cancers, including heavily pretreated and drug-resistant tumors. Based on these results, a randomized phase III trial was conducted in anthracycline-pretreated or resistant and taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer to evaluate ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine. Ixabepilone combination therapy showed significantly superior progression-free survival and tumor responses over capecitabine alone.     

Mechanisms and strategies to overcome chemotherapy resistance in metastatic breast cancer

Resistance to chemotherapeutic agents is a significant issue in the management of patients with breast cancer. Anthracyclines, although first used over 30 years ago, are still part of the standard chemotherapy for this disease. Subsequently, the taxanes heralded a new era in chemotherapy and have been used extensively in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Unfortunately, along with other constituents of combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer such as cyclophosphamide, these agents become increasingly ineffective in progressive disease and tumours are then deemed to be drug resistant - frequently multidrug resistant. A number of processes have been identified that can underlie clinical drug resistance, and these largely stem from in vitro laboratory-based studies in human cancer cell lines. A large proportion of these studies have focused on multidrug resistance associated with resistance to natural product anticancer agents due to the presence of putative drug transporter proteins such as P-glycoprotein, MRP1, and BCRP. Other studies have highlighted mechanisms whereby breast cancer cells show resistance to chemotherapeutic agents by altered regulation of DNA repair processes, with many other factors influencing drug detoxification processes and altering drug targets. New developmental agents with improved specificity for tumour cells, such as trastuzumab, and those with low susceptibility to common tumour-resistance mechanisms, such as ixabepilone, have provided new hope for effective treatment of breast cancer. Ixabepilone is the first in a new class of neoplastics, the epothilones. With these developments in therapy, and the technology of gene expression profiling, the future holds more promise for the development of more effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer.     

Epothilones in the treatment of ovarian cancer

Epothilones are a new group of microtubule-stabilizing agents that have demonstrated antitumor activity in taxane-resistant models. Taxanes remain some of the most active cytotoxic agents in current cancer therapy. Primary or acquired resistance to taxanes in tumor cells partly prevents their long-term efficacy. Certain side effects, such as myelosupression or irreversible neuropathy, can also limit prolonged taxane administration. Epothilone B (EPO906; patupilone), a natural compound, and its semisynthetic derivative, ixabepilone (BMS-247550), differ in their pharmacokinetic and toxicity profiles. Ovarian cancer patients frequently relapse after first-line treatment based on platinum-taxane doublets. Therefore, epothilones might represent a therapeutic alternative in this setting. Patupilone and ixabepilone have undergone parallel clinical development, but their future role in ovarian cancer therapeutics remains ill defined.     

Molecular mechanism of antitumor activity of taxanes in lung cancer (Review)

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer mortality in both male and female patients in the United States of America, as well as in the rest of the world. Over one million people are diagnosed with lung cancer every year worldwide. The taxane is one of the most powerful classes of novel antitumor agents and has become an integral part of several commonly used chemotherapy regimens in lung cancer management over the past few years. Although the ability of taxanes to disrupt microtubule dynamics is well documented, the molecular basis by which taxanes suppress cancer cell growth and induce apoptotic cell death is not clearly defined. In this review, we focus on the molecular mechanisms of the antitumor activity of taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) in lung cancer, and discuss the interactions of taxanes with microtubules, the roles of cell cycle control and cell death induction in the anticancer action of taxanes, as well as the signal transduction pathways involved in the processes. In addition, we discuss the possible mechanisms of taxane resistance, because drug resistance to these anti-neoplastic agents affects therapy efficacy and is also a major obstacle in the clinic for the successful treatment of lung cancer. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the antitumor effect of taxanes and the drug resistance to taxanes may lead to the design of biologically and pharmacologically targeted therapeutic strategies for taxane resistant tumors, and to the improvement of chemotherapy effect and cancer patient survival.     

Efficacy and safety of ixabepilone, a novel epothilone analogue

The epothilones and their analogues are a new class of anticancer agents derived from the fermentation of myxobacterium Sorangium cellulosum. These compounds have some similarities to taxanes in targeting and stabilizing microtubules, but they also have important differences. Among the epothilone family, ixabepilone has emerged to be a semisynthetic epothilone analogue of interest. Ixabepilone has demonstrated consistent preclinical activity and seems active against various taxane-sensible and taxane-resistant cell lines, including those with overexpression of multidrug resistance and with mutations in the beta-tubulin gene. The interest of this ixabepilone has been confirmed clinically. Phase II clinical studies have demonstrated high activity in patients with taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer and in patients with other chemotherapy-resistant tumor types.     

Impact,mechanisms, and novel chemotherapy strategies for overcoming resistance to anthracyclines and taxanes in metastatic breast cancer

Despite advances in treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), prognosis remains poor and median survival is 2–3 years. Resistance to antineoplastics mediated by many factors, potentially including overexpression of drug efflux proteins or altered β-tubulin isotype expression limits the effectiveness of MBC chemotherapy. Capecitabine, approved for anthracycline- and taxane-resistant MBC, has produced modest responses, highlighting the need for more effective treatments for MBC resistant to multiple chemotherapeutic agents. Agents with potential to reverse drug resistance have not proven effective. Albumin-bound paclitaxel is a formulation that may enhance delivery to tumor tissues. Conversely, ixabepilone, an epothilone analog, has been reported to have lower susceptibility to at least some mechanisms of tumor resistance and clinical activity in resistant/refractory MBC. The topoisomerase-I inhibitor irinotecan also has low cross-resistance with other antineoplastics, and has shown some activity against refractory MBC. Development of new agents and identification of genetic biomarkers in translational studies promise to improve management of patients with resistant/refractory breast cancer.