Transperineal prostate biopsy under magnetic resonance image guidance: a needle placement accuracy study

Purpose

To quantify needle placement accuracy of magnetic resonance image (MRI)‐guided core needle biopsy of the prostate.

Materials and Methods

A total of 10 biopsies were performed with 18‐gauge (G) core biopsy needle via a percutaneous transperineal approach. Needle placement error was assessed by comparing the coordinates of preplanned targets with the needle tip measured from the intraprocedural coherent gradient echo images. The source of these errors was subsequently investigated by measuring displacement caused by needle deflection and needle susceptibility artifact shift in controlled phantom studies. Needle placement error due to misalignment of the needle template guide was also evaluated.

Results

The mean and standard deviation (SD) of errors in targeted biopsies was 6.5 ± 3.5 mm. Phantom experiments showed significant placement error due to needle deflection with a needle with an asymmetrically beveled tip (3.2–8.7 mm depending on tissue type) but significantly smaller error with a symmetrical bevel (0.6–1.1 mm). Needle susceptibility artifacts observed a shift of 1.6 ± 0.4 mm from the true needle axis. Misalignment of the needle template guide contributed an error of 1.5 ± 0.3 mm.

Conclusion

Needle placement error was clinically significant in MRI‐guided biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer. Needle placement error due to needle deflection was the most significant cause of error, especially for needles with an asymmetrical bevel. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007;26:688–694. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The effect of catheter displacement and anatomical variations on the dose distribution in MRI-guided focal HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PurposeThe aim of this study was to analyze the effect of catheter displacement and anatomical variations of prostate and organs at risk on dose distribution in MRI-guided 19 Gy single fraction focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) of the prostate.Methods and MaterialsSeventeen patients with localized prostate cancer were enrolled in a prospective trial investigating focal HDR-BT in a 1.5 T MRI-HDR-BT facility. The diagnostic MRI delineations were registered with intraoperative MR scan, and a single fraction of 19 Gy was applied to the visible tumor. Self-anchoring umbrella catheters were used for HDR-BT delivery. A 1.5 T MRI was performed directly after ultrasound (US)-guided catheter placement for treatment planning. After treatment and before removal of catheters, a posttreatment 1.5 T MRI was performed. Regions of interest were also delineated on the posttreatment MR images and the catheters of 17 patients were reconstructed. The dose plan was constructed for the posttreatment MRI scan to assess the influence of catheter migration and anatomical variation on the dose delivered to the target and the organs at risk. Also on the posttreatment MRI, the complete catheter reconstruction was reassessed, to correct for, for example, bending of the catheters. The displacement of catheters between the MRI scans was determined by comparing the catheter tip positions on the treatment planning and posttreatment 1.5 T MRI scans.ResultsThe displacements of 241 catheters were investigated. Average (range) displacements of the umbrella catheters are 0.6 (0–2.9) mm in the x-direction, 0.5 (0–2.1) mm in the y-direction, and 0.9 (0–5.5) mm in the z-direction. In 3 patients, the displacement was >4 mm and up to 5.5 mm. This occurred in respectively 1/13, 1/16, and 1/18 catheters in these patients. The dosimetric differences between the intraoperative treatment and the posttreatment plans were in most patients less than 1.5 Gy. In 4 patients, a dose difference in clinical target volume D95 of >2 Gy up to 5.8 Gy was reported. No discrimination can be made between dose differences due to catheter displacement and/or organ movement/anatomy changes.ConclusionsIn general, catheter displacements were in the order of a mm and differences in dose to the clinical target volume and the organs at risk between the treatment and posttreatment plans smaller than 1.5 Gy. In some patients, dose differences up to 5.8 Gy were determined, due to either individual larger catheter displacement and/or anatomy changes. A longer followup is necessary to assess the clinical implications of individual large dose differences.     

Evaluation of an MR-only interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy workflow using MR-line marker for catheter reconstruction

PurposeMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers excellent soft-tissue contrast enabling the contouring of targets and organs at risk (OARs) during gynecological interstitial brachytherapy procedure. Despite its benefit, one of the main challenges toward MRI-only workflows is that the implanted catheters are not reliably visualized on MR images. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of MR-only workflow using an in-house MR line marker during interstitial gynecological high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.Methods and MaterialsTen patients diagnosed with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with HDR brachytherapy were included in this study. The hybrid CT/MR-treated plan was used as the study reference plan. Five users manually reconstructed the catheter's path on MR images (3D T1- and T2-weighted). Subsequently, the dwell positions from the users’ plans were superimposed on the reference plans to evaluate the dosimetric impact of the using MR-only for catheter reconstruction in comparison with hybrid CT/MR approach. Variability of dwell positions between users and reconstruction time was also evaluated.ResultsMore than 96.90% of catheter reconstruction variations were < 2 mm. No statistical differences were reported between MR-only and hybrid CT/MR in gross tumor volume D₉₈ and high-risk clinical target volume D₉₀, respectively. For the OARs (bladder, sigmoid, rectum, and bowel), no significant changes were observed in any dose metrics between MR-only and hybrid CT/MR. The average reconstruction time was 51 ± 10 minutes across all ten patients.ConclusionThe feasibility of MR-only workflow using MR line marker during interstitial gynecological HDR brachytherapy has been validated in this study. The results show that the MR-only workflow is equivalent to the conventional hybrid CT/MR approach in terms of gross tumor volume and high-risk clinical target volume coverage and respecting of OARs dose limits.     

System for MR image-guided prostate interventions: canine study

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the use of a transrectal system that enables precise magnetic resonance (MR) image guidance and monitoring of prostate interventions. The system used a closed-bore 1.5-T MR imaging unit and enables one to take advantage of the higher signal-to-noise ratio achieved with traditional magnet designs, which is crucial for accurate targeting and monitoring of prostate interventions. In the first of the four canine studies, reliable needle placement, with all needles placed within 2 mm of the desired target site, was achieved. In two other studies, MR imaging was used to monitor distribution of injected contrast agent solution (gadopentetate dimeglumine mixed with trypan blue dye) in and around the prostate, thereby confirming that solution had been delivered to the desired tissue and also detecting faulty injections. In the final study, accurate placement and MR imaging of brachytherapy seeds in the prostate were demonstrated. The described system provides a flexible platform for a variety of minimally invasive MR image-guided therapeutic and diagnostic prostate interventions.     

High-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate adenocarcinoma post abdominoperineal resection of the rectum and pelvic irradiation: Technique and experience

PurposeTreatment options are limited for patients with localized prostate cancer and a prior history of abdominoperineal resection (APR) and pelvic irradiation. We have previously reported on the successful utility of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy salvage for prostate cancer failing definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). In this report, we describe our technique and early experience with definitive HDR brachytherapy in patients post APR and pelvic EBRT.Patients and MethodsSix men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer had a prior history of APR and pelvic EBRT. Sixteen to 18 HDR catheters were placed transperineally under transperineal ultrasound–guidance. The critical first two catheters were placed freehand posterior to the inferior rami on both sides of the bulbar urethra under cystoscopic visualization. A template was used for subsequent catheter placement. Using CT-based planning, 5 men received 36 Gy in six fractions as monotherapy. One patient initially treated with EBRT to 30 Gy, received 24 Gy in four fractions.ResultsMedian age was 67.5 (56–74) years. At a median followup of 26 (14–60) months, all patients are alive and with no evidence of disease per the Phoenix definition of biochemical failure, with a median prostate-specific antigen nadir of 0.19 ng/mL. Three men have reported grade 2 late genitourinary toxicity. There has been no report of grade 3–5 toxicity.ConclusionTransperineal ultrasound–guided HDR brachytherapy using the above technique should be considered as definitive therapy for patients with localized prostate cancer and a prior history of APR and pelvic EBRT.     

Impact of oedema on implant geometry and dosimetry for temporary high dose rate brachytherapy of the prostate

The optimal timing of dosimetry for permanent seed prostatic implants remains contentious given the half life of post-implant oedema resolution. The aim of this study was to establish whether prostatic oedematous change over the duration of a temporary high dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy (BR) boost would result in significant needle displacement, and whether this change in geometry would influence dosimetry. Two CT scans, one for dosimetric purposes on the day of the implant and the second just prior to implant removal, were obtained for four patients receiving transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy. The relative changes in cross-sectional dimensions of the implants were calculated by establishing the change in mean radial distance (MRD) of the needle positions from the geometric centre of the implant for each patient's pair of CT studies. The treatment plan, as calculated from the first CT scan, was used in the second set of CT images to allow a comparison of dose distribution. The percentage change in MRD over the duration of the temporary implants ranged from -1.91% to 1.95%. The maximum change in estimated volume was 3.94%. Dosimetric changes were negligible. In the four cases studied, the degree of oedematous change and consequent displacement of flexiguide needle positions was negligible and did not impact on the dosimetry. The rate and direction of oedematous change can be extremely variable but on the basis of the four cases studied and the results of a larger recent study, it might not be necessary to re-image patients for dosimetric purposes over the duration of a fractionated HDR BT boost to the prostate where flexiguide needles are utilized. Nevertheless, further investigation with larger patient numbers is required.     

Automatic passive tracking of an endorectal prostate biopsy device using phase-only cross-correlation.

MR-guided transrectal prostate biopsy is currently a time-consuming procedure because the imaging slice is often manually realigned with the biopsy needle during lesion targeting. In this work a pulse sequence is presented that automatically follows a passive marker attached to a dedicated MR biopsy device holder, thus providing an alternative to existing active tracking methods. In two orthogonal tracking FLASH images of the marker the position of the needle axis is automatically identified using a phase-only cross-correlation (POCC) algorithm. The position information is then used to realign a trueFISP imaging slice in real time. In phantom experiments the sensitivity of this technique to initial misalignments of the marker and to the signal-to-noise ratio was evaluated. In several puncture experiments the precision of the needle placement was analyzed. The POCC algorithm allowed for a precise identification of the marker in the images even under severe initial misalignments of up to 45 degrees. At a frame rate 1 image/s a precision of the needle placement of 1.5 +/- 1.1 mm could be achieved.     

System for robotically assisted prostate biopsy and therapy with intraoperative CT guidance

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the work-in-progress prototype of an image-guided, robotic system for accurate and consistent placement of transperineal needles into the prostate with intraoperative image guidance inside the gantry of a computed tomographic (CT) scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The coach-mounted system consists of a seven-degrees-of-freedom, passive mounting arm: a remote-center-of-motion robot; and a motorized, radiolucent needle-insertion device to deliver 17-18-gauge implant and biopsy needles into the prostate with the transperineal route. The robot is registered to the image space with a stereotactic adapter. The surgeon plans and controls the intervention in the CT scanner room with a desktop computer that receives DICOM images from the CT scanner. The complete system fits in a carry-on suitcase, does not need calibration, and does not utilize vendor-specific features of the CT scanner. RESULTS: In open air, the average accuracy was better than 1 mm at a 5-8-cm depth. In various phantoms, the average orientation error was 1.3 degrees, and the average distance between the needle tip and the target was 2 mm. CONCLUSION: Results of preliminary experiments indicate that this robotic system may be suitable for transperineal needle placement into the prostate and shows potential in a variety of other percutaneous clinical applications.     

MR-guided prostate interventions

In this article the current issues of diagnosis and detection of prostate cancer are reviewed. The limitations for current techniques are highlighted and some possible solutions with MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy approaches are reviewed. There are several different biopsy approaches under investigation. These include transperineal open magnet approaches to closed-bore 1.5T transrectal biopsies. The imaging, image processing, and tracking methods are also discussed. In the arena of therapy, MR guidance has been used in conjunction with radiation methods, either brachytherapy or external delivery. The principles of the radiation treatment, the toxicities, and use of images are outlined. The future role of imaging and image-guided interventions lie with providing a noninvasive surrogate for cancer surveillance or monitoring treatment response. The shift to minimally invasive focal therapies has already begun and will be very exciting when MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery reaches its full potential.     

First pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA) implementation for catheter detection in interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy

PURPOSEA pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA) sequence was optimized to detect empty catheters in interstitial (HDR) brachytherapy with clinically acceptable spatial accuracy for the first time. Image quality and catheter detectability were assessed in phantoms, and the feasibility of PETRA's clinical implementation was assessed on a gynecological cancer patient.METHODS AND RESULTSEmpty catheters embedded in a gelatin phantom displayed positive signal on PETRA and more accurate cross-sections than on clinically employed T2-weighted sequences, differing by 0.4 mm on average from their nominal 2 mm diameter. PETRA presented minimal susceptibility differences and a symmetric metal artifact, contrary to the clinical sequences. The PETRA-CT catheter tip position differences assessed by a treatment planning system (TPS) were < 1 mm. PETRA also detected an interstitial template with empty catheters penetrating a poultry phantom and fused very well with CT. Interstitial catheter positional difference between PETRA and CT images was < 1 mm on average, increasing with distance from isocenter. All interstitial catheters and the employed interstitial template were detected on PETRA images of an endometrial adenocarcinoma patient. Empty needles were traceable using a TPS, with higher spatial resolution and more favorable contrast than on T2-weighted images used for contouring. A treatment plan could be produced by combining information from PETRA for catheter detection and from T2-weighted images for tumor and organs delineation.CONCLUSIONSPETRA detected successfully and accurately interstitial catheters in phantoms. Its first clinical implementation shows a potential for MR-only treatment planning in interstitial HDR brachytherapy.     

Rectum dose reduction and individual treatment plan optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: Different doses and techniques used in high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy make it difficult to define universal quality parameters. The aim of this study was to develop individual, objective parameters for the evaluation of an HDR brachytherapy plan for prostate radiation. METHODS: Fifty-three patients who received an HDR brachytherapy boost after external radiation were analyzed in this study. Brachytherapy was performed with a (192)Ir source after ultrasound-guided, transperineal metal needle application followed by removal of the ultrasound probe to reduce organ dose levels at the anterior rectum wall. The rectum and prostate locations as well as the dose at the anterior rectum wall were estimated under the anatomical conditions of HDR prostate brachytherapy. The doses at the organs at risk (rectum and urethra) were analyzed for several parameters, which were compared to values of former patients before the start of treatment. In cases of major deviations, modifications of the treatment plan were performed before starting the treatment. RESULTS: Deflating of the water balloon led to an increase of the space between the anterior rectal wall and the dorsal margin of the prostate (mean, 6mm; 1-10mm). The dose of the introduced "virtual rectum," represented by the ventral surface of the ultrasound probe, in the treatment plan correlated to dose measurements in the rectum. Pretreatment evaluation and comparison of the established individual quality parameters led in two cases to a treatment plan modification. CONCLUSIONS: This method allows a fast and objective individual brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation and improvement.     

Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device

Thirty-seven consecutive patients with elevated PSA levels and negative tumor prostate biopsies underwent a MR-guided prostate biopsy in a 1.5-T scanner in the supine position. After localization of suspected tumor areas using an endorectal coil and two body-phased array coils, the biopsy device was positioned without any repositioning of the patient. The biopsy device consisted of a mount, a ball joint, a positioning stage and an insertion stage with a needle guide, which was filled with a MR-visible fluid to control positioning of the needle using a balanced steady-state free precession sequence (TrueFISP) and a high-resolution turbo spin echo (T2-TSE) sequence. Core biopsies were taken manually in the magnet. The biopsy needle could be correctly positioned in all cases. Suspected lesions with a diameter ≥10 mm could be successfully punctured. Four to nine (mean =6) biopsies were taken per patient. In 14 patients, prostate cancer was confirmed at histology. Twenty-four biopsies positive for cancer were performed in 14 patients. A correct correlation was found between the site of biopsy and histology. MR-guided prostate biopsy can be effective in increasing primary positive tumor biopsy results in patients with a history of negative tumor TRUS-guided prostate biopsies.     

Needle migration and dosimetric impact in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer evaluated by repeated MRI

PurposeTo quantify needle migration and dosimetric impact in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer and propose a threshold for needle migration.Methods and MaterialsTwenty-four high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with an HDR boost of 2 × 8.5 Gy were included. Patients received an MRI for planning (MRI1), before (MRI2), and after treatment (MRI3). Time from needle insertion to MRI3 was ∼3 hours. Needle migration was evaluated from coregistered images: MRI1-MRI2 and MRI1-MRI3. Dose volume histogram parameters from the treatment plan based on MRI1 were related to parameters based on needle positions in MRI2 or MRI3. Regression was used to model the average needle migration per implant and change in D90 clinical target volume, CTV_prostate+3mm. The model fit was used for estimating the dosimetric impact in equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions for dose levels of 6, 8.5, 10, 15, and 19 Gy.ResultsNeedle migration was on average 2.2 ± 1.8 mm SD from MRI1-MRI2 and 5.0 ± 3.0 mm SD from MRI1-MRI3. D90 CTV_prostate+3mm was robust toward average needle migration ≤3 mm, whereas for migration >3 mm D90 decreased by 4.5% per mm. A 3 mm of needle migration resulted in a decrease of 0.9, 1.7, 2.3, 4.8, and 7.6 equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions for dose levels of 6, 8.5, 10, 15, and 19 Gy, respectively.ConclusionsSubstantial needle migration in high-dose-rate brachytherapy occurs frequently in 1–3 hours following needle insertion. A 3-mm threshold of needle migration is proposed, but 2 mm may be considered for dose levels ≥15 Gy.     

High-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy based on registered transrectal ultrasound and in-room cone-beam CT images

PurposeTo present a high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy procedure for prostate cancer using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to contour the regions of interest and registered in-room cone-beam CT (CBCT) images for needle reconstruction. To characterize the registration uncertainties between the two imaging modalities and explore the possibility of performing the procedure solely on TRUS.Methods and MaterialsPatients were treated with a TRUS/CBCT-based HDR brachytherapy procedure. For 100 patients, dosimetric results were analyzed. For 40 patients, registration uncertainties were examined by determining differences in fiducial marker positions on TRUS and registered CBCT. The accuracy of needle reconstruction on TRUS was investigated by determining the position differences of needle tips on TRUS and CBCT. The dosimetric impact of reregistration and needle reconstruction on TRUS only was studied for 8 patients.ResultsThe average prostate V₁₀₀ was 97.8%, urethra D₁₀ was 116.3%, and rectum D_{1 cc} was 66.4% of the prescribed dose. For 85% of the patients, registration inaccuracies were within 3 mm. Large differences were found between needle tips on TRUS and CBCT, especially in cranial–caudal direction, with a maximum of 10.4 mm. Reregistration resulted in a maximum V₁₀₀ reduction of 0.9%, whereas needle reconstruction on TRUS only gave a maximum reduction of 9.4%.ConclusionsHDR prostate brachytherapy based on TRUS combined with CBCT is an accurate method. Registration uncertainties, and consequently dosimetric inaccuracies, are small compared with the uncertainties of performing the procedure solely based on static TRUS images. CBCT imaging is a requisite in our current procedure.     

Transperineal prostate intervention: robot for fully automated MR imaging--system description and proof of principle in a canine model

The study was approved by the animal care and use committee. The purpose of the study was to prospectively establish proof of principle in vivo in canines for a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-compatible robotic system designed for image-guided prostatic needle intervention. The entire robot is built with nonmagnetic and dielectric materials and in its current configuration is designed to perform fully automated brachytherapy seed placement within a closed MR imager. With a 3.0-T imager, in four dogs the median error for MR imaging-guided needle positioning and seed positioning was 2.02 mm (range, 0.86-3.18 mm) and 2.50 mm (range, 1.45-10.54 mm), respectively. The robotic system is capable of accurate MR imaging-guided prostatic needle intervention within a standard MR imager in vivo in a canine model.     

Palliative Interstitial HDR Brachytherapy for Recurrent Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE: To report the methods and clinical results of CT-based interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy procedures for the palliative treatment of recurrent rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 44 brachytherapy implants were performed in 38 patients. CT-guided catheter implants were performed in 34 patients under local anesthesia and sedation, and four patients were implanted intraoperatively. Of 40 CT-guided implants, 20 were done using metallic needles introduced via the sacrum and 20 were transperineal implants of plastic tubes in the presacral region. Postimplant CT scans were used for three-dimensional (3-D) conformal brachytherapy planning. Patients implanted with metallic needles were given a single fraction of 10-15 Gy using HDR (192)Ir, and those who received transperineal implants of plastic catheters were given fractionated brachytherapy, 5 Gy twice daily to a total dose of 30-40 Gy. The median tumor volume was 225 cm(3) with a range of 41-2,103 cm(3). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 23.4 months, a total of 13/38 patients were alive. The median postbrachytherapy survival was 15 months with 18 of the 25 deaths due to distant metastases. Tumor response was as follows: 6/38 partial remission, 28/38 stable disease, and 4/38 local progression. A planning target volume (PTV) coverage > 85% was achieved in 42/44 implants. The treatment was well tolerated, and no acute complications were observed. One patient developed a fistula after 8 months. Pain relief was recorded in 34 patients (89.5%), and the median duration of this palliative effect was 5 months with a range of 1-13 months. CONCLUSIONS: Interstitial HDR brachytherapy is a valuable tool for the delivery of high doses and achieves effective palliation in recurrent rectal carcinoma.     

Evaluation of T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in localizing prostate cancer before repeat biopsy

We assessed the accuracy of T2-weighted (T2w) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in localizing prostate cancer before transrectal ultrasound-guided repeat biopsy. Ninety-three patients with abnormal PSA level and negative prostate biopsy underwent T2w and DCE prostate MRI using pelvic coil before repeat biopsy. T2w and DCE images were interpreted using visual criteria only. MR results were correlated with repeat biopsy findings in ten prostate sectors. Repeat biopsy found prostate cancer in 23 patients (24.7%) and 44 sectors (6.6%). At per patient analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 47.8%, 44.3%, 20.4% and 79.5% for T2w imaging and 82.6%, 20%, 24.4% and 93.3% for DCE imaging. When all suspicious areas (on T2w or DCE imaging) were taken into account, a sensitivity of 82.6% and a negative predictive value of 100% could be achieved. At per sector analysis, DCE imaging was significantly less specific (83.5% vs. 89.7%, p < 0.002) than T2w imaging; it was more sensitive (52.4% vs. 32.1%), but the difference was hardly significant (p = 0.09). T2w and DCE MRI using pelvic coil and visual diagnostic criteria can guide prostate repeat biopsy, with a good sensitivity and NPV.     

High-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy in a patient with bilateral hip prostheses planned using megavoltage computed tomography images acquired with a helical tomotherapy unit

PurposeThe presence of hip prostheses results in significant image artifacts making delineation of anatomy for planning difficult with traditional kilovoltage CT images. This report presents the use of megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) imaging acquired with a helical tomotherapy unit to plan a high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy treatment for a patient with bilateral hip prostheses.Methods and MaterialsA 77-year-old man presented with a localized clinical Stage T3a, Gleason 7 prostate cancer. Past history was also significant for bilateral hip prostheses. Staging workup included a negative bone scan and CT of abdomen and pelvis. The pelvic CT exhibited significant streak artifacts obscuring the prostate. HDR monotherapy with adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was proposed. On the day of the implant and after catheter insertion, MVCT imaging of the pelvic area of the patient was obtained using a commercial helical tomotherapy unit. The MVCT images were transferred to Nucletron PLATO (v14.3.2) for planning with optimization of catheter dwell positions and times.ResultsMVCT images acquired with the helical tomotherapy unit allow good visualization of bony anatomy and of the hip prosthesis. No reconstruction streak artifacts are visible in the images as seen in the diagnostic kilovoltage CT images. Sufficient soft tissue contrast exists to allow delineation of the bladder and rectum. The absence of streak artifacts provides good quantification of Hounsfield number in the region surrounding the hip prosthesis and allows for good dose quantification.ConclusionsMVCT images obtained using the commercial helical tomotherapy unit have been shown to provide good soft tissue contrast and no streak artifacts when planning a patient for prostate HDR brachytherapy having bilateral prosthetic hip replacements. The rectum and bladder can be clearly seen in the MVCT images and contoured independently. Prostate delineation is assumed from the position of the brachytherapy catheters.     

3-D Conformal HDR Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE: Pilot study to evaluate feasibility, acute toxicity and conformal quality of three-dimensional (3-D) conformal high-dose- rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer using intraoperative real-time planning. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 05/2002 and 05/2003, 52 patients with prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < or = 10 ng/ml, Gleason score < or = 7 and clinical stage < or = T2a were treated. Median PSA was 6.4 ng/ml and median Gleason score 5. 24/52 patients had stage T1c and 28/52 stage T2a. For transrectal ultrasound-(TRUS-)guided transperineal implantation of flexible plastic needles into the prostate, the real-time HDR planning system SWIFT((R)) was used. After implantation, CT-based 3-D postplanning was performed. All patients received one implant for four fractions of HDR brachytherapy in 48 h using a reference dose (D(ref)) of 9.5 Gy to a total dose of 38.0 Gy. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed to evaluate the conformal quality of each implant using D(90), D(10) urethra, and D(10) rectum. Acute toxicity was evaluated using the CTC (Common Toxicity Criteria) scales. RESULTS: Median D(90) was 106% of D(ref) (range: 93-115%), median D(10) urethra 159% of D(ref) (range: 127-192%), and median D(10) rectum 55% of D(ref) (range: 35-68%). Median follow-up is currently 8 months. In 2/52 patients acute grade 3 genitourinary toxicity was observed. No gastrointestinal toxicity > grade 1 occurred. CONCLUSION: 3-D conformal HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy using intraoperative real-time planning is a feasible and highly conformal treatment for localized prostate cancer associated with minimal acute toxicity. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate late toxicity and biochemical control.     

An integrated system for clinical treatment verification of HDR prostate brachytherapy combining source tracking with pretreatment imaging

PurposeHigh-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy treatment is usually delivered in one or a few large dose fractions. Poor execution of a planned treatment could have significant clinical impact, as high doses are delivered in seconds, and mistakes in an individual fraction cannot be easily rectified. Given that most potential errors in HDR brachytherapy ultimately lead to a geographical miss, a more direct approach to verification of correct treatment delivery is to directly monitor the position of the source throughout the treatment. In this work, we report on the clinical implementation of our treatment verification system that uniquely combines the 2D source-tracking capability with 2D pretreatment imaging, using a single flat panel detector (FPD).Methods and MaterialsThe clinical brachytherapy treatment couch was modified to allow integration of the FPD into the couch. This enabled the patient to be set up in the brachytherapy bunker in a position that closely matched that at treatment planning imaging. An anteroposterior image was acquired of the patient immediately before treatment delivery and was assessed by the Radiation Oncologist online, to reestablish the positions of the catheters relative to the prostate. Assessment of catheter positions was performed in the left-right and superior-inferior directions along the entire catheter length and throughout the treatment volume. Source tracking was then performed during treatment delivery, and the measured position of the source dwells were directly compared to the treatment plan for verification.ResultsThe treatment verification system was integrated into the clinical environment without significant change to workflow. Two patient cases are presented in this work to provide clinical examples of this system, which is now in routine use for all patient treatments in our clinic. The catheter positions were visualized relative to the prostate, immediately before treatment delivery. For one of the patient cases presented in this work, they agreed with the treatment plan on average by 1.5 mm and were identifiable as a predominantly inferior shift. The source tracking was performed during treatment delivery, and for the same case, the mean deviation from the planned dwell positions was 1.9 mm (max = 4.9 mm) for 280 positions across all catheters.ConclusionWe have implemented our noninvasive treatment verification system based on an FPD in the clinical environment. The device is integrated into a patient treatment couch, and the process is now included in the routine clinical treatment procedure with minor impact on workflow. The system which combines both 2D pretreatment imaging and HDR 2D source tracking provides a range of information that can be used for comprehensive treatment verification. The system has the potential to meaningfully improve safety standards by allowing widespread adoption of routine treatment verification in HDR brachytherapy.