Red Blood Cells (RBC) and High Fluorescence Reticulocytes (HFR) production increased by induction chemotherapy and GM-CSF plus G-CSF in peripheral blood of breast cancer patients

The preservation of erythrocytes is important during cytostatic chemotherapy. To study the synergistic effect of GM-CSF plus G-CSF on the red blood recovery, we looked at the kinetics of red blood cells, total reticulocytes and High Fluorescence Reticulocytes (HFR) from peripheral blood of 26 breast cancer patients, between 2 cycles of chemotherapy. After four days of TNCF (Thp-doxorubicin, Vinorelbine, Cyclophosphamide, Fluorouracil) treatment, 12 patients received either GM-CSF or G-CSF (D5-D16) and 14 received both of them (GM-CSF, D5-D14 and G-CSF, D10-D14). Our results showed a significantly lesser RBC decrease for patients receiving both CSFs versus only one CSF (p < 0.05). This greater RBC preservation was explained by the increase of HFR and total reticulocytes from D12 to D17 in the peripheral blood of patients receiving the two CSFs, with significantly values greater than that of patients receiving one CSF (p < 0.01) it showed that the synergistic GM-CSFplus G-CSF effect observed previously on PBPC results in a positive effect on erythroid lineage. GM-CSF plus G-CSF association exhibit in vivo multilineage (myeloid and erythroid) activity showing the interest to use different cytokines in combination to obtain a better hematological recovery after induction chemotherapy as well as a better quality of PBPC mobilization for transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy.     

Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on priming peripheral blood progenitor cells for use with autologous bone marrow after high-dose chemotherapy

Two hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors, granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF), have been shown to accelerate leukocyte and neutrophil recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow (BM) support. Despite their use, a prolonged period of absolute leukopenia persists during which infections and other complications of transplantation occur. We collected large numbers of peripheral blood (PB) progenitors after CSF administration using either G-CSF or GM-CSF and tested their ability to affect hematopoietic reconstitution and resource utilization in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support. Patients with breast cancer or melanoma undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support were studied in sequential nonrandomized trials. After identical high-dose chemotherapy, patients received either BM alone, with no CSF; BM with either G-CSF or GM-CSF; or BM with G-CSF or GM-CSF and G-CSF or GM-CSF primed peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). Hematopoietic reconstitution, as well as resource utilization, was monitored in these patients. The use of CSF- primed PBPC led to a highly significant reduction in the duration of leukopenia with a white blood cell (WBC) count under 100 and 200 cells/mL, and neutrophil count under 100 and 200 cells/mL with both GM- and G-CSF primed PB progenitor cells, compared with the use of the CSF with BM or with historical controls using BM alone. In addition, the use of CSF-primed PBPC resulted in a significant reduction in median number of antibiotics used, days in the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, and hospital resources used. Patients receiving G-CSF primed PBPC also experienced a reduction in the median number of days in the hospital, red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, platelet transfusions, days on antibiotics, and discounted hospital charges. Phenotypic analysis of the CSF-primed PBPC indicated the presence of cells bearing antigens associated with both early and late hematopoietic progenitor cells. The use of CSF-primed PBPC can significantly improve hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support. In addition, the use of G-CSF-primed PBPC was associated with a significant reduction in hospital resource utilization, and a reduction in hospital charges.     

Etoposide (VP-16) plus G-CSF mobilizes different dendritic cell subsets than does G-CSF alone

Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen-presenting cells that are critical to the generation of immunologic tumor responses. Myeloid DCs (DC1) express myeloid antigen CD11c; lymphoid DCs (DC2) express CD123(+) and are CD11c(-). Analysis of DC subsets from peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) collected from normal donors mobilized with G-CSF shows a predominance of DC2 cells. Whether PBPCs mobilization by chemotherapy yields different subsets of DCs has not been studied. We analyzed DC subsets in apheresis products from 44 patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation from 6/00 to 5/01. Patients received either G-CSF alone (10 microg/kg per day, n=11) or etoposide (2 g/m(2)) plus G-CSF (n=33) for progenitor cell mobilization. The patients were apheresed for 2-10 days (median 3) to reach a minimum of 2.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Patients receiving G-CSF alone mobilized significantly more total DC2s than did those receiving etoposide plus G-CSF (median 6.2 x 10(6)/kg vs 2.9 x 10(6)/kg, P=0.001). The DC2/DC1 ratio was also significantly different in the two groups, with the G-CSF group having a higher ratio (median 1.2 vs 0.4, P<0.001). We conclude that the combination of chemotherapy plus G-CSF yields different mobilized dendritic cell subsets than does G-CSF alone.     

Potentiation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-induced mobilization of circulating progenitor cells by seven-day pretreatment with interleukin-3

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as a single agent is increasingly used for the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for stem cell transplantation. In patients with perturbed hematopoiesis the mobilizing capacity of G-CSF alone may be inadequate. We have shown in rhesus monkeys that interleukin-3 (IL-3) pretreatment markedly potentiated the increase in PBPC numbers by subsequent administration of granulocyte/macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF). Here we studied the effect of IL-3 pretreatment on G-CSF-induced mobilization of PBPCs in 6 patients with Hodgkin's disease (n = 5) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 1) who had low progenitor cell numbers because of previous chemotherapy. Patients were treated in cycle 1 with G-CSF at a dose of 5 microgram/kg/d for 5 days and, after a treatment-free interval, received cycle 2 consisting of 5 microgram/kg/d of IL-3 for 7 days followed by G-CSF again at a dose of 5 microgram/kg/d for 5 days. G-CSF alone increased the mean number of circulating colony-forming units-GM (CFU-GM) by 21-fold, the number of burst-forming units-erythroid (BFU- E) by 9-fold, and the number of CFU-mix by 24-fold over pretreatment values. Treatment with 5 microgram/kg/d of IL-3 for 7 days did not mobilize by itself but significantly potentiated G-CSF-induced mobilization of all progenitor cell types leading to a 56-, 15-, and 46- fold increase over baseline of CFU-GM, BFU-E, and CFU-mix numbers, respectively. In 2 patients in whom leukapheresis was performed after G- CSF alone the target number of 2 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells was not reached. However, leukapheresis after the IL-3/G-CSF combination obtained > or =2 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells in 3 of 6 patients, including both patients who had inadequate collection after G-CSF alone. In one patient adequate function of mobilized progenitors could be shown by the demonstration of rapid trilineage engraftment after infusion of progenitors after myeloablative chemotherapy. Seven-day pretreatment with IL-3 may be a useful mean to augment mobilization of circulating progenitors by G-CSF. The combination of IL-3 and G-CSF seems to allow the procurement of sufficient numbers of PBPCs in some patients who cannot be mobilized adequately by G-CSF alone.     

Immunohistochemical detection of breast cancer cells in paired peripheral blood progenitor cell specimens collected after cytokine or cytokine and myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) from 30 patients with advanced breast cancer were studied for the presence of tumor cell contamination using a highly sensitive immunohistochemical technique with the capacity to detect one tumor cell in one million mononuclear cells. Aliquots of PBPC were obtained after 4 days of G-CSF and/or GM-CSF and again during G-CSF-stimulated recovery from myelosuppressive doses of cyclophosphamide. The overall incidence of tumor cell contamination was 23%, occurring in PBPC specimens from seven of 30 patients. All four cases in which tumor cells were detected after mobilization with cytokine alone also had tumor cells detected in PBPCs collected following chemotherapy and G-CSF. There were three cases in which malignant contamination was detected only in the specimens collected after cyclophosphamide. There was a greater frequency of tumor cell contamination in aphereses performed during G-CSF-stimulated recovery from cyclophosphamide than in collections primed by cytokine alone (13% vs 23%; P = 0.08), although this did not reach statistical significance. This trend suggests that collection of PBPC during cytokine-stimulated recovery from myelosuppressive chemotherapy may be associated with a greater risk of contamination with malignant cells than apheresis during mobilization with cytokines in the steady state.     

Increased numbers of long-term culture-initiating cells in the apheresis product of patients randomized to receive increasing doses of stem cell factor administered in combination with chemotherapy and a standard dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

Long-term culture-initiating cells (LTC-IC) are arguably the most primitive human hematopoietic cells detectable by in vitro functional assays. We have investigated the mobilization of these cells into the blood of patients with ovarian carcinoma randomized to receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; 5 micrograms/kg) plus different doses of stem cell factor (SCF; c-kit ligand) after chemotherapy or G-CSF alone after chemotherapy. We have shown a significant SCF dose response for the mobilization of LTC-IC, with a 5.8-fold increase in LTC-IC mobilization in those patients receiving chemotherapy, G-CSF, and 20 micrograms/kg of SCF, the highest dose used, compared with the patients receiving chemotherapy and G-CSF alone. We have shown a threefold increase in CD34+ cells and up to a 64- fold increase in CD34+/33- cells was seen in patients treated with chemotherapy, G-CSF, and 20 micrograms/kg of SCF compared with those patients treated with chemotherapy and G-CSF alone. However, significant numbers of CD34+/38- cells were only found in the patients receiving 20 micrograms/kg of SCF as part of their mobilization regimen. Patients receiving chemotherapy plus G-CSF and SCF have enhanced mobilization of primitive cells and of the more committed progenitor cells compared with those patients receiving chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone.     

Incidence of tumor-cell contamination in leukapheresis products of breast cancer patients mobilized with stem cell factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or with G-CSF alone.

We have assessed tumor contamination of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in 203 high-risk breast cancer patients who were prospectively randomized to mobilization with stem cell factor (SCF) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus G-CSF alone. The patients then received high-dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and carmustine (BCNU) with PBPC support. One bone marrow aspirate obtained before treatment, one whole blood specimen obtained before cytokine infusion, and one to five leukapheresis products were tested for the presence of tumor cells by an alkaline phosphatase immunocytochemical technique with a targeted sensitivity of 1.7 tumor cells per 10(6) hematopoietic cells. Tumor cells were detected in the bone marrow, peripheral blood, and/or PBPC of 21 patients (10%). In 14 patients, bone marrow specimens were tumor-positive; in seven patients, premobilization whole blood specimens were tumor-positive, and in eight patients, leukapheresis products were tumor-positive. In five patients, repetitive or multiple specimens were tumor-positive, and in three cases, marrow, peripheral blood, and PBPC products were all tumor-positive. Nine of the patients in whom tumor cells were found in marrow or peripheral blood were clinical stage II to III and 12 were clinical stage IV. Nine of the tumor-positive patients were in the SCF + G-CSF arm and 12 were in the G-CSF arm. Tumor cells were detected in leukapheresis products of eight patients: three in the G-CSF + SCF arm and five in the G-CSF arm. We conclude that detectable tumor-cell contamination of bone marrow, peripheral blood, and/or PBPC occurred in approximately 10% of patients in this trial and was observed in stage II to III patients, as well as in stage IV patients. No significant difference could be found in the rate of PBPC tumor-cell contamination between patients who received SCF + G-CSF compared with those who received G-CSF alone. Neither mobilization regimen was found to increase the rate of tumor-cell contamination when control premobilization blood samples were compared with leukapheresis products.     

Action of interleukin-3, G-CSF, and GM-CSF on highly enriched human hematopoietic progenitor cells: synergistic interaction of GM-CSF plus G-CSF

Purified preparations of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), granulocyte CSF (G-CSF), and interleukin 3 (IL-3 or multi-CSF) alone and in combination, have been compared for their stimulatory effects on human granulocyte-macrophage colony forming cells (GM-CFC). In cultures of unseparated normal human bone marrow, the combinations of G-CSF plus IL-3 and GM-CSF plus IL-3 stimulated additive numbers of GM colonies, while GM-CSF plus G-CSF stimulated greater than additive numbers of GM colonies, compared with the sum of the colony formation obtained with each factor alone. Cultures of unseparated bone marrow, harvested from patients four to six days after administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), resulted in additive GM colony formation with GM-CSF plus G-CSF, GM-CSF plus IL-3, and G-CSF plus IL-3. In order to address the possibility of secondary factor involvement in the synergistic interaction of GM-CSF and G-CSF, CD33+/CD34+ colony forming cells were separated from normal and post FU marrow by two color fluorescence activated cell sorting. In cultures of CD33+/CD34+ cells the combination of GM-CSF plus G-CSF stimulated a synergistic increase in GM colonies while GM-CSF plus IL-3 stimulated additive numbers of colonies. These results suggest that GM-CSF, G-CSF, and IL-3 stimulate distinct populations of GM-CFC. Furthermore GM-CSF and G-CSF interact synergistically and this action is a direct effect on progenitor cells not stimulated by GM-CSF or G-CSF alone.     

Use of concurrent G-CSF + GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in children with malignant disease

There is limited experience in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in children and the optimal method for PBPC mobilization is unknown. The present study was conducted to ascertain whether mobilization with G-CSF + GM-CSF (group I) provides some advantage over G-CSF alone (group II) in terms of collected CD34+ cells and hematopoietic recovery following myeloablative conditioning in children with malignancies. An economic analysis was also performed. Each group comprised 21 consecutive patients. The mean number of aphereses was 1.5+/-0.5 in group I and 1.2+/-0.46 in group II (NS). The mean number of CD34+ cells was 3.8 x 106+/-4.03/kg in group I and 4.2+/-5.4 in group II (NS). The mean number of total blood volumes (TBV) processed was 4.4+/-1.5 in group I and 4.3+/-1.5 in group II (NS). The mean duration of the procedure was 276+/-74.1 min in group I and 286.7+/-75.9 min in group II (NS), and the inlet flow was 45.1+/-12 ml/min in group I and 39.5+/-15.1 ml/min in group II (NS). No significant differences in the neutrophil and platelet engraftment probability were observed between the two groups. The mean overall cost of group II was not statistically significant from that of group I (US$ 9521+/-330 vs US$ 10201+/-1028, P = NS). The cost of mobilization was significantly higher in group I than in group II, conditioning regimen costs were similar in both groups and the costs related to the post-transplant period were similar in both groups. We conclude that PBPC mobilization with G-CSF + GM-CSF in children does not enhance hematological recovery in comparison with mobilization using G-CSF alone. However, the combination of G-CSF + GM-CSF does not significantly increase the overall cost of transplantation.     

Etoposide plus G-CSF priming compared with G-CSF alone in patients with lymphoma improves mobilization without an increased risk of secondary myelodysplasia and leukemia

The use of etoposide (VP-16) for stem cell mobilization has been reported as a significant risk factor for the development of therapy-related myelodysplasia/therapy-related AML (tMDS/tAML) after transplantation. We compared the safety and effectiveness of VP-16+G-CSF (VP+G) to G-CSF alone for PBPC mobilization in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma who underwent autologous transplantation at the Cleveland Clinic and Ohio State University. In the VP+G group, median total CD34+ cells collected were 9.34 × 10(6) per kg (range 0.97-180.89), with 42% of all patients having adequate (2 × 10(6) cells per kg) CD 34+ collection after 2 days of apheresis compared with a median in the G-CSF group of 3.83 × 10(6) per kg (range, 0.72-50.38), with only 16% patients having adequate collection after 2 days (P<0.001). tMDS/tAML occurred in 15 patients (2.3%) in the VP+G and in 12 patients (3.8%) receiving G-CSF alone. (P=0.62). Increased number of days of apheresis was associated with the risk of tMDS/tAML (hazard ratio (HR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.30, P<0.001). Priming regimen was not a significant variable for relapse-free survival or OS. The addition of etoposide significantly improves the effectiveness of mobilization at the cost of an increased incidence of neutropenic fever though with no mortalities. There is no evidence of increased incidence of tMDS/tAML in patients receiving VP+G compared with those mobilized with G-CSF alone.     

The increase of the rate of hemopoietic recovery and clinical benefit of the erythropoietin (EPO) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) after intensive cyclic chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients

The role of erythropoietin (EPO) plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) combination in hemopoietic recovery was studied in patients with high-risk breast carcinoma and compared to a control group of previously treated identical patients who were not given EPO plus G-CSF. Eleven consecutive patients admitted to this study had Stage III or IV breast cancer. They received 6 cycles of intensive chemotherapy (epirubicin 150 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1300 mg/m2). The 1st cycle served for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). At its end leukaphereses collections of PBPC were performed to be used as hematologic support (PBPCT) in the 5 remaining cycles. The administration of EPO plus G-CSF was started when leukocyte (WBC) count in peripheral blood dropped below 1 x 10(9)/l and hemoglobin (Hb) level fell below 100 g/l. The treatment was stopped when leukocyte count rose to 5 x 10(9)/l and Hb to 130 g/l. EPO plus G-CSF combination after PBPCT produced significant effects in terms of hemopoietic recovery, clinical benefit and supportive care requirements when compared with 12 historic control patients: Periods of leukopenia were shorter which resulted in reduced risk of infectious complications. The grades of leukopenia in the study and control groups were as follows: grade 4 (36 vs. 18%), grade 3 (57 vs. 30%), grade 2 (7 vs. 13%) respectively. Significantly shorter was the time of PLT recovery < 50 x 10(9)/l (p < 0.001). The grades of thrombocytopenia were: grade 4 (29 vs. 11%), grade 3 (21 vs. 12%), grade 2 (25 vs. 36%) respectively. The number of necessary transfusions was significantly reduced as well as the length of hospital stay (p < 0.001). In conclusion, our results obtained in this study confirm that combination of EPO plus G-CSF not only increases the rate of hemopoietic recovery, reduces the number of necessary red blood cell and platelet transfusions but, at the same time, simplifies the clinical management and is more tolerable for the patients.     

Analysis of remobilization success in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplants who fail an initial mobilization: risk factors, cytokine use and cost

Inadequate stem cell mobilization is seen in approximately 25% of patients undergoing autotransplantation for hematologic malignancies. Remobilization strategies include chemotherapy/cytokine combinations or high-dose cytokines alone or in combination. From 1/1997 to 7/2002, we remobilized 86 patients who failed an initial mobilization (median total CD34=0.72 x 10(6)/kg) in sequential cohorts using high-dose G-CSF (32 microg/kg/day) or G-CSF(10 microg/kg/day)+GM-CSF (5 microg/kg/day). No difference in CD34/kg yields were seen (G-CSF alone: 2.2 x 10(6) and G-CSF+GM-CSF 1.6 x 10(6)) in the median 3 aphereses performed (P=0.333). Of the 86, 23 (27%) failed the second mobilization; 14 were remobilized again (yield=1.5 x 10(6) CD34/kg; three aphereses). Of the 86, 93% went to transplant: three progressed, and three had inadequate stem cells. Significant risk factors for a failed remobilization were: number of stem-cell-damaging regimens (P=0.015), time between last chemotherapy and first mobilization (P=0.028), and higher WBC at initiation of first mobilization (P=0.04). High-dose G-CSF (32 microg/kg/day) was more costly @ USD $9,016, vs $5,907 for the G-CSF+GM-CSF combination (P<0.001). Most patients failing an initial mobilization benefit from a cytokine only remobilization. Lower cost G-CSF+GM-CSF is as effective as high-dose G-CSF.     

Prolonged release and c-kit expression of haemopoietic precursor cells mobilized by stem cell factor and granulocyte colony stimulating factor

Mobilization of haemopoietic precursor cells into the circulation by the combination of cytokines, stem cell factor (SCF) and G-CSF in previously untreated patients with carcinoma of the breast resulted in increased yield of collected peripheral blood precursor cells (PBPC). This mobilization of PBPC by SCF with G-CSF lasted several days after ceasing the cytokines in comparison to the rapid fall of PBPC after ceasing G-CSF. Possible mechanisms for this increased and prolonged mobilization were investigated. Immunological phenotyping with CD38, Thy-1 and MDR-1 of the CD34-positive mobilized PBPC detected no difference in maturity compared to PBPC mobilized by G-CSF alone. However, the down-regulation of c-kit, which is associated with the mechanism of mobilization, was much greater in the PBPC mobilized by SCF and G-CSF. The potential clinical implication of increased and prolonged mobilization is increased yield, allowing transplantation of heavily pre-treated patients, transplantation with PBPC from a single apheresis, or PBSC support for multiple courses of high-dose therapy from one mobilization procedure.     

Comparison of megakaryopoiesis in vitro of paired peripheral blood progenitor cells and bone marrow harvested during remission in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia

We have studied paired peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and bone marrow (BM) samples from 12 acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients following intensive chemotherapy, and assessed direct granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM), erythroid burst-forming units (BFU-E), megakaryocyte CFU (CFU-Mk) numbers and the production of CD61+ (platelet glycoprotein IIIa) cells in suspension culture in response to various haemopoietic growth factor combinations. We found that CFU-GM and BFU-E numbers per 105 mononuclear cells were similar in both AML PBPC and BM harvests; CFU-Mk numbers, however, were significantly higher in PBPC than BM. In addition, the higher total white cell count of the PBPC harvests meant that PBPC have much higher numbers of total progenitors per collection. CD61+ cell numbers in suspension cultures of AML PBPC and BM were lower than those of harvested normal marrow. However, response to pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEGrHuMGDF) both alone and in combination with other growth factors was qualitatively similar to that of normal BM. As with normal BM, response to PEGrHuMGDF alone did not increase further with addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF), interleukin 6 (IL-6) or erythropoietin (EPO) in the AML PBPC and BM. Further responses over PEGrHuMGDF alone were seen when added with stem cell factor (SCF) or with a combination of SCF + IL-3 + EPO in both AML PBPC and BM cultures; however, the magnitude of the response was greater in the PBPC cultures. Response to PEGrHuMGDF + IL-3 was seen in the PBPC cultures but not in the AML BM. These data suggest that, in AML patients, there are proportionally more megakaryocyte progenitor cells in the mobilized PBPC than in the BM harvests, which would explain the more rapid platelet recovery following PBPC autografts.     

Enhanced antileukemic activity of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplants following donor treatment with the combination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and stem cell factor (SCF) in a murine transplantation model

Allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) have mostly been mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). There is neither clinical nor experimental data available addressing the question if other hematopoietic growth factors or combinations thereof might influence engraftment, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effects after allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT). We used a murine model to investigate these parameters after transplantation of PBPCs mobilized with G-CSF and SCF either alone or in combination. Treatment of splenectomized DBA and Balb/c mice with 250 microg/kg/day G-CSF for 5 days resulted in an increase of CFU-gm from 0 to 53/microl. The highest progenitor cell numbers (147/microl) were observed after treatment with 100 microg/kg/day SCF administered in conjunction with G-SCF. No differences were detected with regard to the number of T cells (CD3+), T cell subsets (CD4+, CD8+), B cells (CD19+) and NK cells (NK1.1+) in PBPC grafts mobilized by G-CSF plus SCF compared to those mobilized with G-CSF alone. The antileukemic activity of syngeneic and MHC-identical allogeneic PBPC grafts was investigated in lethally irradiated Balb/c mice bearing the B-lymphatic leukemia cell line A20. In this model, PBPCs mobilized by G-CSF plus SCF exerted a significantly higher antileukemic activity compared to grafts mobilized by G-CSF alone (94 vs 71% freedom from leukemia at day 100, P<0.05). The antileukemic effect was lowest after BMT (38% freedom from leukemia). Since significant differences in the incidence of lethal GvHD were not observed, improved GVL-activity resulted in superior overall survival. Our data demonstrate that the utilization of specific hematopoietic growth factors not only improve the yield of hematopoietic progenitor cells but can also significantly enhance the immunotherapeutic potential of allografts.     

Mechanism of synergy between granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in colony formation from human marrow cells in vitro

The synergy of human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in the colony formation derived from human marrow cells was studied. The colony formation stimulated by GM-CSF plus G-CSF was dependent on the dose of each CSF, with the plateau for the number of GM colonies being higher than the sum of the individual plateaus by GM-CSF or G-CSF. Analysis of the colonies formed by GM-CSF plus G-CSF revealed efficient formation of neutrophil and monocyte colonies. To study the effect of GM-CSF and G-CSF on the maintenance of the progenitors that respond to the synergy of the CSFs, addition of each CSF to the medium of clonal cell culture was delayed. The progenitors that formed colonies on day 7 due to synergy of the CSFs were perfectly maintained by GM-CSF for at least 72 h and the progenitors that formed colonies on day 14 due to synergy of the CSFs were partly maintained by G-CSF or GM-CSF. The DNA synthetic rate of the progenitor cells that respond to GM-CSF plus G-CSF was significantly lower than those that respond to GM-CSF or G-CSF. According to light scatter analysis of phagocyte-depleted marrow mononuclear cells (PD-MMCs) using a flow cytometer, the peak population of progenitors that respond to GM-CSF plus G-CSF was in the smaller part of the PD-MMCs than those to GM-CSF or G-CSF. These results indicated that the progenitors to the synergy of GM-CSF and G-CSF are in a different proliferative state than those to each CSF. The synergy of GM-CSF and G-CSF depends on each CSF maintaining the viability of a different population of GM progenitors that can form GM colonies by both CSFs together.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial comparing rhG-CSF with the combination of rhG-CSF plus rhEpo after VIP-E chemotherapy.

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) can be mobilized by chemotherapy, cytokines, or the combination of both. Recently, data from two non-randomized studies were published, showing an advantage for a combination of rhG-CSF plus rhEpo compared to rhG-CSF alone in mobilization of PBPC. To address this question we initiated a prospective, randomized trial in patients with breast cancer. Thirty (28 female, two male) of 32 randomized patients were evaluable. After primary surgery, therapy consisted of two cycles of VIP-E chemotherapy followed by high-dose (HD) chemotherapy with VIC. Mobilization and harvest of PBPC followed cycle 2. Group A received 5 microg rhG-CSF/kg body weight (bw) plus 150 IU rhEpo/kg bw. Group B was treated with 5 microg rhG-CSF/kg bw from dl until end of harvest. In the peripheral blood CD34+ cells as well as colony-forming units (CFU) started to rise on d8 with a peak on d10, followed by a decrease. No significant differences were observed between the groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference with regard to MNC, CD34+ cells BFU-E and CFU-GM in apheresis products. Transplantation of > 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg bw after HD chemotherapy resulted in normal hematological recovery of all patients. No differences were observed in time to neutrophil or platelet recovery and need for blood product support. In this study addition of rhEpo to our standard mobilization chemotherapy did not result in improved mobilization of PBPC or in clinical benefits after HD chemotherapy.     

Reduced risk of acute GVHD following mobilization of HLA-identical sibling donors with GM-CSF alone

We retrospectively reviewed the results of transplanting peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) allografts from HLA-matched sibling donors mobilized using various hematopoietic cytokines. Patients had received allografts mobilized with Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (G, N = 65) alone, G plus Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (G/GM, N = 70), or GM-CSF alone at 10 or 15 microg/kg/day (GM, N = 10 at 10 microg/kg/day and 21 at 15 microg/kg/day). The CD34+ and CD3+ cell content of grafts were significantly lower following GM alone compared to G alone (P < 0.001 and 0.04, respectively). Nonhematopoietic toxicity observed in donors precluded dose escalation of GM-CSF beyond 10 microg/kg/day. Hematopoietic recovery was similar among all three groups. Grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was observed in only 13% of patients in the GM alone group compared to 49 and 69% in the G alone or G/GM groups, respectively (P < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, receipt of PBPC mobilized with GM alone was associated with a lower risk of grades II-IV acute GVHD (hazard ratio 0.21; 95% CI 0.073, 0.58) compared to G alone or G/GM. There were no differences in relapse risk or overall survival among the groups. Donor PBPC grafts mobilized with GM-CSF alone result in prompt hematopoietic engraftment despite lower CD34+ cell doses and may reduce the risk of grades II-IV acute GVHD following HLA-matched PBPC transplantation.     

Peripheral blood progenitor cells mobilized by chemotherapy plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor accelerate both neutrophil and platelet recovery after high-dose VP16, ifosfamide and cisplatin

Summary. We report on the chemotherapy plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) induced mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) and their impact on haematopoietic recovery following high-dose chemotherapy. Twenty-four patients with advanced solid tumours or lymphomas received standard-dose chemotherapy with VP16, ifosfamide and cisplatin (VIP) followed by filgrastim (G-CSF; 5 μg/kg s.c. daily for 14 d) for the prevention of chemotherapy induced neutropenia and for the simultaneous mobilization of PBPCs. Maximal numbers of progenitors of different lineages were reached at day 11 (range 9–14) after VIP chemotherapy. A median of 0·415 × 10⁹/1 CD34⁺ cells (range 0·11–1·98), 9000 CFU-GM/ml (range 2800–17700). 3500 BFU-E/ml (range 400–10800) and 200 CFU-GEMM/ml (range 0–4400) were recruited. One single apheresis yielded a median of 1·6 × 10⁸ mononuclear cells/kg (range 0·2–5·4) or 5·4 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg body weight (range 0·2–24·2). Fourteen patients who showed at least a partial remission after two cycles of the standard-dose chemotherapy regimen were subjected to high-dose VIP chemotherapy (cumulative doses of 1500 mg/m² VP16, 12 g/m² ifosfamide and 150 mg/m² cisplatin) with or without PBPC support. The first six patients were treated with growth factors only (IL-3/GM-CSF) and did not receive PBPCs, whereas the following eight patients were supported with PBPCs in addition to IL-3 and GM-CSF. Neutrophil recovery as well as platelet recovery were significantly faster in patients receiving PBPCs with a median of 6·5 d below 0·1 × 10⁹ neutrophils/1 and 3 d below 20 × 10⁹ platelets/1 as compared to 10·5 d and 8 d in control patients receiving growth factors only. The accelerated platelet recovery in patients supported with PBPCs might be explained—in the absence of detectable colony-forming units megakaryocyte—by the presence of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa⁺, non-proliferating endomitotic megakaryocytic precursor cells within G-CSF mobilized PBPCs. Our data demonstrate that chemotherapy plus G-CSF mobilized PBPCs accelerate both neutrophil and platelet recovery after high-dose VIP chemotherapy in patients with solid tumours or lymphomas.     

Hematopoietic growth factors for graft failure after bone marrow transplantation: a randomized trial of granulocyte-macrophage colony- stimulating factor (GM-CSF) versus sequential GM-CSF plus granulocyte- CSF

Delay in hematologic recovery after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) can extend and amplify the risks of infection and hemorrhage, compromise patients' survival, and increase the duration and cost of hospitalization. Because current studies suggest that granulocyte- macrophage (GM) colony-stimulating factor (CSF) may potentiate the sensitivity of hematopoietic progenitor cells to G-CSF, we performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing GM-CSF (250 micrograms/m2/d x 14 days) versus sequential GM-CSF x 7 days followed by G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/d x 7 days) as treatment for primary or secondary graft failure after BMT. Eligibility criteria included failure to achieve a white blood cell (WBC) count > or = 100/microL by day +21 or > or = 300/microL by day +28, no absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or = 200/microL by day +28, or secondary sustained neutropenia after initial engraftment. Forty-seven patients were enrolled: 23 received GM-CSF (10 unrelated, 8 related allogeneic, and 5 autologous), and 24 received GM- CSF followed by G-CSF (12 unrelated, 7 related allogeneic, and 5 autologous). For patients receiving GM-CSF alone, neutrophil recovery (ANC > or = 500/microL) occurred between 2 and 61 days (median, 8 days) after therapy, while those receiving GM-CSF+G-CSF recovered at a similar rate of 1 to 36 days (median, 6 days; P = .39). Recovery to red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence was slow, occurring 6 to 250 days (median, 35 days) after enrollment with no significant difference between the two treatment groups (GM-CSF: median, 30 days; GM-CSF+G- CSF; median, 42 days; P = .24). Similarly, platelet transfusion independence was delayed until 4 to 249 days (median, 32 days) after enrollment, with no difference between the two treatment groups (GM- CSF: median, 28 days; GM-CSF+G-CSF: median, 42 days; P = .38). Recovery times were not different between patients with unrelated donors and those with related donors or autologous transplant recipients. Survival at 100 days after enrollment was superior after treatment with GM-CSF alone. Only 1 of 23 patients treated with GM-CSF died versus 7 of 24 treated with GM-CSF+G-CSF who died 16 to 84 days (median, 38 days) after enrollment, yielding Kaplan-Meier 100-day survival estimates of 96% +/- 8% for GM-CSF versus 71% +/- 18% for GM-CSF+G-CSF (P = .026). These data suggest that sequential growth factor therapy with GM-CSF followed by G-CSF offers no advantage over GM-CSF alone in accelerating trilineage hematopoiesis or preventing lethal complications in patients with poor graft function after BMT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)