Prevention of recurrent amiodarone-induced hyperthyroidism by iodine-131

Amioradone-induced hyperthyroidism is a common complication of amiodarone therapy. Although definitive interruption of amiodarone is recommended because of the risks of aggravation of the arrhythmias, some patients may require the reintroduction of amiodarone several months after normalisation of thyroid function. The authors undertook a retrospective study of the effects of preventive treatment of recurrences of amiodarone-induced hyperthyroidism with I131. The indication of amiodarone therapy was recurrent, symptomatic, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in 13 cases and ventricular tachycardia in 5 cases (M = 14, average age 64 +/- 13 years). The underlying cardiac disease was dilated cardiomyopathy (N = 5), ischaemic heart disease (N = 3), hypertensive heart disease (N = 2), arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (N = 2) or valvular heart disease (N = 2). Two patients had idiopathic atrial fibrillation. An average dose of 576 +/- 184 MBq of I131 was administered 34 +/- 37 months after an episode of amiodarone-induced hyperthyroidism. Amiodarone was reintroduced in 16 of the 18 patients after a treatment-free period of 98 +/- 262 days. Transient post-radioiodine hyperthyroidism was observed in 3 cases (17%). Sixteen patients (89%) developed hypothyroidism requiring replacement therapy with L-thyroxine. There were no recurrences of amiodarone-induced hyperthyroidism. After 24 +/- 17 months follow-up, the arrhythmias were controlled in 13 of the 16 patients (81%) who underwent the whole treatment sequence. The authors conclude that preventive treatment with I131 is an effective alternative to prevent recurrence of amiodarone-induced hyperthyroidism in patients requiring reintroduction of amiodarone to control their arrhythmias.     

Long-term preventive effect and safety of amiodarone in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation refractory to class I antiarrhythmic agents: analysis based on patient profiles

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The factors controlling the preventive effect of long-term amiodarone therapy were evaluated in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The 55 patients (37 men and 18 women, mean age 68 +/- 9 years) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation refractory to more than two types of Class I antiarrhythmic agents received amiodarone (100-200mg/day) after electrical or pharmacological cardioversion. All patients were observed for 12 months or more (mean follow-up period 48.6 +/- 29.1 months). RESULTS: Actuarial recurrence-free rate at 12 months in patients with ejection fraction < 55% (76.5%, n = 17) was significantly higher than that in patients with ejection fraction > or = 55% (44.7%, n = 38) (p = 0.0411), and tended to be higher in patients with underlying heart disease (65.5%, n = 29) than in patients without underlying heart disease (42.3%, n = 26) (p = 0.0980). Age, sex, diabetes mellitus, alcohol intake, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and administration of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor were not related to the effect of amiodarone. Relative risk reduction of recurrence after amiodarone therapy was 4.01 (95% confidence interval 3.57-4.45) in patients with ejection fraction < 55%, and 2.59 (95% confidence interval 2.07-3.11) in patients with underlying heart disease. None of the above-mentioned factors was related to the development of adverse effects. The incidence of adverse effects requiring discontinuation in all patients was 7.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone was more effective for preventing recurrence in patients with poorer left ventricular function and underlying heart disease.     

Effect of low-dose amiodarone on atrial fibrillation or flutter in Japanese patients with heart failure.

The efficacy and safety of amiodarone in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter in 108 Japanese patients with heart failure was retrospectively examined. Thirty-four (41%) of the 82 patients who were in sinus rhythm after 1 month of amiodarone administration had their first recurrence, 70% of cases occurring within 1 year of initiation. The cumulative rates of maintenance of sinus rhythm were 0.68, 0.55, and 0.47 at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Amiodarone was more effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal AF or flutter than in those with the persistent form (p<0.05). The cumulative rates for cases that remained in permanent AF were 0.04, 0.11, and 0.14 at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Apart from suppressing AF, the mean heart rate during Holter monitoring was significantly decreased with amiodarone therapy in cases of permanent AF. Adverse effects requiring the discontinuation of amiodarone therapy occurred in 16% of patients. Low-dose amiodarone therapy may prevent AF or flutter in Japanese patients with heart failure.     

Long-term efficacy of amiodarone therapy for the prevention of recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Analysis based on patient characteristics

There is little information available on factors affecting the long-term prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Japanese population. A total of 71 patients (49 men, mean age, 68 ± 8 years) with paroxysmal AF refractory to ≥ 2 class I antiarrhythmic drugs received oral amiodarone (50-200 mg/day). All patients were observed for more than 12 months (mean follow-up period, 47 ± 26 months) and were analyzed on the basis of patient profiles. The percentage of patients with AF recurrence despite amiodarone therapy was 54% in all patients. In multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and sex, the following factors were associated with preventive efficacy for AF recurrence: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (relative risk [RR] 0.933, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.877-0.993, P = 0.029), asymptomatic AF (RR 0.068, CI 0.005-0.870, P = 0.039), and AF occurring irrespective of circadian variation (RR 0.115, CI 0.013-0.988, P = 0.049). The percentage of patients with conversion to permanent AF despite amiodarone therapy was 31% in all patients. In multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and sex, asymptomatic AF (RR 0.085, CI 0.010-0.732, P = 0.025) was the only factor associated with preventive efficacy for conversion to permanent AF. Amiodarone appears to be effective in maintaining sinus rhythm, especially in patients with impaired left ventricular function. In contrast, amiodarone appears to be refractory in those with asymptomatic AF or AF occurring irrespective of circadian variation.     

Intravenous amiodarone for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common causes of hospital admission, with a prevalence of up to 5% of the population, increasing with advancing age. Emergency direct current cardioversion is the therapy of choice when arrhythmia leads to hemodynamic compromise, but in patients who are hemodynamically stable, antiarrhythmic drugs are usually given to restore sinus rhythm. HYPOTHESIS: The study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of intravenous amiodarone in cardioversion of recent-onset paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). No standard antiarrhythmic therapy has been accepted for pharmacologic cardioversion of AF. Amiodarone seems to be a promising candidate, but only few randomized trials are available and the results are inconsistent. METHODS: In all, 160 patients with AF lasting < 24 h were randomly assigned (2:1 fashion) to the amiodarone group (n = 106) receiving 5 mg/kg as a 30 min intravenous (i.v.) infusion, followed by i.v. infusion of 10 mg/kg during 20 h diluted in 1000 ml of 10% glucose with 20 IU of rapid-action insulin, 80 mEq of potassium chloride, and 8 g of magnesium sulphate (GIKM), or to the control group (n = 54) receiving 1000 ml of GIKM alone. Treatment was continued up to 20 h independent of sinus rhythm restoration. RESULTS: Sinus rhythm was restored 20 h after initiation of therapy in 88 (83%) patients in the amiodarone group and in 24 (44%) patients in the control group (p < 0.0001). The difference between efficacy of the two treatment modalities became significant already after 8 h of therapy (53 vs. 14 patients with sinus rhythm, respectively, p < 0.05). The mean dose of amiodarone administered until sinus rhythm restoration was 740 +/- 296 mg. The presence and the type of underlying heart disease did not influence the conversion rate in either group. In two patients (1.8%) treated with amiodarone, the return of sinus rhythm was preceded by asystole. CONCLUSION: Amiodarone is effective in the termination of AF lasting < 24 h. It may be particularly useful in patients with organic heart disease in whom class I antiarrhythmic agents may be contraindicated. During treatment, the heart rhythm should be monitored continuously.     

Combination therapy with amiodarone and enalapril in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation prevents the development of structural atrial remodeling

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between long-term efficacy of amiodarone therapy (100-200 mg/day) combined with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI; enalapril 5 mg/day) administration, and the development of structural atrial remodeling in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Fifty-eight patients (40 men, 18 women, mean age, 68 +/- 8 years, mean follow-up period, 43 +/- 18 months) with AF refractory to >or= two class I antiarrhythmic drugs were divided into two groups; those treated with enalapril on amiodarone (group A, n = 25) and those treated with amiodarone alone (group B, n = 33), to evaluate the efficacy of combination therapy. 1) At 12 and 24 months, the survival rates for patients free from AF recurrence were 80% and 64% in group A, and 45% and 30% in group B, respectively (P < 0.05, group A versus group B). The percentage of patients with conversion to permanent AF despite amiodarone therapy was 20% in group A and 48.5% in group B (P < 0.05, group A versus group B). 2) In group B, left atrial dimension (LAD) was significantly greater after amiodarone therapy (40.2 +/- 6.3 mm) than at baseline (35.2 +/- 6.6 mm) (P < 0.01), whereas there was no significant difference in LAD between baseline and after amiodarone therapy in group A (39.1 +/- 5.0 mm versus 41.0 +/- 5.0 mm, respectively). In patients with paroxysmal AF, ACE-I appears to enhance the efficacy of amiodarone therapy in maintaining sinus rhythm and preventing the development of structural remodeling in atria.     

Effect of amiodarone on dispersion of atrial refractoriness and cycle length in patients with atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION: Amiodarone is effective in preventing the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardioversion (CV). Dispersion of atrial refractoriness may be relevant to the generation of AF. We designed a study to determine the electrophysiologic effects of amiodarone in patients with previous early recurrence of AF after CV. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen patients with previous AF recurrence (without antiarrhythmic drugs) after CV (CV1) were selected for amiodarone therapy and repeat CV (CVamio). Prior to CV1, mean AF cycle length (AFCL) had been recorded at four atrial sites (right atrial appendage [RAA], distal coronary sinus [DCS], right atrial lateral wall [LAT], and interatrial septum [IAS]) and dispersion of AFCL had been calculated. These patients were treated with amiodarone and, prior to CVamio, AFCL was recorded at the four atrial sites as for CV1. Between CV1 and CVamio, AFCL increased at all atrial sites: 153 +/- 13 msec to 179 +/- 14 msec at RAA, 144 +/- 12 msec to 174 +/- 18 msec at DCS, 158 +/- 13 msec to 182 +/- 16 msec at LAT, and 161 +/- 18 msec to 181 +/- 17 msec at IAS. Dispersion of AFCL decreased from 24 +/- 10 msec at CV1 to 15 +/- 11 msec at CVamio (P = 0.01). The median time in sinus rhythm increased from 3.12 hours post CV1 to 28 days post CVamio, (P < 0.02). CONCLUSION: Amiodarone causes a reduction in the dispersion of AFCL. This action may be relevant to the beneficial effects of amiodarone in patients with AF.     

Efficacy of amiodarone for preventing the recurrence of symptomatic paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation after cardioversion.

BACKGROUND: It has been previously reported that the efficacy of class I antiarrhythmics in preventing the recurrence of symptomatic paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited when AF lasts for 48 h or more. However, it is unclear whether the efficacy of amiodarone, a class III drug, is superior to class I antiarrhythmics in patients with long-lasting AF. METHOD AND RESULTS: The relationship between the duration of tachycardia and the efficacy of amiodarone in preventing recurrence of tachycardia was examined in 55 patients (37 men, 18 women, mean age 68+/-9 years) to whom amiodarone was administered after electrical or pharmacological cardioversion for paroxysmal and persistent AF. In 26 patients, paroxysmal and persistent AF ceased within 48 h after onset (Group A), and in the other 29 patients, it ceased after 48 h (Group B). Patient characteristics and actuarial recurrence-free rates were compared between the 2 groups. The mean follow-up period was 30+/-11 months. No statistically significant difference between the groups was found in patient characteristics. Actuarial recurrence-free rates in Group A and B at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 100%, 81%, 69%, 62%, and 54%, and 93%, 79%, 66%, 52%, and 48%, respectively (p=NS at 12 months). The period of maintenance of sinus rhythm was 14.7+/-3.2 months in group A and 13.3+/-3.3 months in group B (mean+/-SE, p=NS). CONCLUSION: In the case of amiodarone, efficacy for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of AF was not biased by the duration of arrhythmia. This observation suggests amiodarone is effective in maintaining normal sinus rhythm after cardioversion, even in patients with long-lasting AF and electrical atrial remodeling.     

Amiodarone therapy in patients implanted with cardioverter-defibrillator for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Whether amiodarone can improve the patient's clinical outcome by reducing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy deliveries for ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF) has not been clearly evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 507 patients with VT/VF due to organic heart disease who had ICDs implanted were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into 3 groups: Amiodarone (n=247), Class I anti-arrhythmic drug (n=103) and Control (n=157) groups, and the total cause mortality and arrhythmic event free survival rates were evaluated between the groups. The mean follow-up period was 38+/-27 months. The left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly decreased in the Amiodarone group (Amiodarone: 37+/-15%; Class I: 39+/-16%; Control: 44+/-17%). The mortality and arrhythmic events were significantly higher in the Class I group than the Amiodarone group (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the Amiodarone and Control groups (arrhythmic event free rate at 5 years: Amiodarone: 53%; Class I: 35%; Control: 48%; 5 year survival: 86%, 74% and 77%, respectively). Side effects from amiodarone were found in 12% of the patients, but no fatal events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study could not demonstrate the benefit of amiodarone in ICD patients, probably due to a significant clinical bias exerted in selecting this drug.     

Value of electrophysiologic studies in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy treated with amiodarone

The relation of electrophysiologic effects of amiodarone to long-term outcome was studied in 35 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). Indications for electrophysiologic studies were: cardiac arrest (n = 3), syncope/presyncope (n = 27) and asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT) (n = 5). Twenty-eight patients (80%) had VT, 3 (9%) atrial tachycardia and 3 (9%) paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during 24-hour Holter monitoring. The studies were repeated after a total amiodarone dose of 58 +/- 122 g and during a maintenance median daily dose of 400 mg. Amiodarone abolished paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias in all 6 patients. However, it caused marked atrioventricular nodal conduction abnormality in 3 patients and heart block or marked HV interval prolongation (to greater than or equal to 100 ms) in 4 patients. Sustained VT was induced in 26 patients (74%) at baseline study and in 23 patients (66%) taking amiodarone therapy. With amiodarone, VT was no longer inducible or was more difficult to induce in 11 patients (31%), and the drug abolished VT during Holter monitoring in all patients. However, VT was easier to induce with amiodarone or was induced only with amiodarone in 18 (51%) patients. Amiodarone significantly slowed the rate of induced VT (from 248 +/- 29 to 214 +/- 37 beats/min, p less than 0.001). This was associated with a change in its morphology from polymorphic to monomorphic VT in 7 patients. During a follow up of 18 +/- 14 months (range 2 to 56), amiodarone was discontinued because of adverse effects in 8 patients (23%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The various effects of amiodarone on thyroid function.

Amiodarone, a benzofuranic-derivative iodine-rich drug used mostly for tachyarrhythmias, often causes changes in the peripheral metabolism of thyroid hormones mainly due to the inhibition of 5'-deiodinase activity: an increase in serum thyroxine and reverse triiodothyronine, and a decrease in serum triiodothyronine concentrations. Overt thyroid dysfunction, either amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT) or amiodarone-induced hypothyroidism (AIH), occurring in 14% to 18% of patients receiving long-term treatment, may develop both in apparently normal thyroid glands and in glands with preexisting abnormalities. AIH is mainly due to the failure to escape from the acute Wolff-Chaikoff effect, and, in patients with thyroid autoimmune phenomena, to concomitant Hashimoto's thyroiditis. AIT is due to excess iodine-induced thyroid hormone synthesis (type I AIT) or to amiodarone-related destructive thyroiditis (type II AIT), although mixed forms often occur. Treatment of AIH consists of levothyroxine replacement therapy while continuing amiodarone therapy; alternatively, amiodarone can be discontinued, if possible, and the natural course toward euthyroidism can be accelerated by a short trial of potassium perchlorate. In type I AIT, the simultaneous administration of thionamides and potassium perchlorate is the treatment of choice, while in type II AIT steroids are the most useful therapeutic option. Mixed forms are best treated with a combination of thionamides, potassium perchlorate, and glucocorticoids. The low thyroidal 131I uptake usually makes radioiodine therapy not feasible, while thyroidectomy is a valid alternative in cases resistant to medical therapy.     

The acute treatment of supraventricular tachycardia with endovenous amiodarone

In the present study we evaluated 35 patients of both sexes, aged 21-84, with newly occurring supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, 19 atrial fibrillation (AF), 6 atrial flutter (FL) and 10 paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias (PSVT). They were treated with a single amiodarone infusion up to two hours after the restoration of a stable sinus rhythm or to a maximus dose of 2,400 mg (in 24 hours). Plasma amiodarone concentration and QTc were measured at the restoration of sinus rhythm and twelve hours after the amiodarone withdrawal. Amiodarone infusion restored a stable sinus rhythm in all 10 patients of the PSVT group (100%), in 5 of the FL group (83%) and in 16 of the AF group (84%). The average dose needed to stop PSVT was lesser than for AF and FL (M + SE: 473.3 +/- 36.88 vs 1842.1 + 259.6 vs 1548.8 +/- 345.5 mg; p less than 0.001). The average plasma amiodarone concentration at the restoration of sinus rhythm was 2450.4 +/- 175.9 SE ng/ml in all the tachyarrhythmias as a whole without any statistically significant difference among PSVT, FL and AF. Moreover no correlation exists between plasma amiodarone concentrations and the amount of amiodarone infused. QTc showed a statistically significant transient lengthening at the restoration of sinus rhythm, but not twelve hours after amiodarone withdrawal. In conclusion, a single dose of amiodarone is effective and safe in all newly occurring supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, without any important side effect and with a high therapeutic index in pharmacologic cardioversion as alternative treatment to cardioversion.     

Prospective randomized study comparing amiodarone vs. amiodarone plus losartan vs. amiodarone plus perindopril for the prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: The purpose of this trial was to compare the long-term efficacy of low-dose amiodarone with losartan and perindopril (both combined with low-dose amiodarone) for the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in patients with lone paroxysmal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: One-hundred and seventy-seven patients with lone paroxysmal AF were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: group 1 received low-dose amiodarone alone, group 2 received low-dose amiodarone plus losartan, and group 3 received low-dose amiodarone plus perindopril. Left atrial diameter was measured with transthoracic echocardiogram at baseline and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after randomization. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AF documented by 12-lead ECG or Holter after 14 days and within 24 months after randomization. The primary endpoint was reached in 24 patients (41%) in group 1, 11 (19%) in group 2, and 14 (24%) in group 3 (P = 0.02). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in AF recurrence in group 2 (P = 0.006, log-rank test) as well as in group 3 (P = 0.04, log-rank test) when compared with group 1. No difference in the AF recurrence-free survival was found between group 2 and group 3. After 24 months follow-up, the left atrial diameter in group 2 and group 3 was significantly smaller than that in group 1 (36 +/- 2.3 and 35 +/- 2.4 vs. 38 +/- 2.4 mm, P < 0.001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the combination of perindopril or losartan with low-dose amiodarone is more effective than low-dose amiodarone alone for the prevention of AF recurrence in patients with lone paroxysmal AF. Adding losartan or perindopril to amiodarone can inhibit left atrial enlargement in this group of patients.     

Amiodarone therapy does not compromise subsequent heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVES. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of pulmonary complications, feasibility of early hospital discharge and requirements for postoperative inotropic and chronotropic support in patients receiving amiodarone therapy before heart transplantation. BACKGROUND. Although many patients waiting for heart transplantation will die of arrhythmias before a donor heart is found, the use of amiodarone has been limited by concern about increased complications in the perioperative period. METHODS. The 29 patients receiving amiodarone at the time of heart transplantation at University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center between October 1986 and September 1990 were compared with 29 control recipients to evaluate postoperative morbidity. Patients were receiving amiodarone for recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias (n = 11), atrial fibrillation (n = 2) or complex ventricular ectopic activity (n = 16). The average daily dose was 360 +/- 230 mg/day for an average of 11 +/- 22 months before transplantation. Amiodarone and control groups had a similar ejection fraction (0.18 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.20 +/- 0.08), frequency of coronary disease, age and gender. There were three more status I patients in the control group. OKT3 was given to only two patients receiving amiodarone and 12 control patients at high risk for renal dysfunction. RESULTS. Postoperatively, the duration of assisted ventilation was 21 +/- 19 h after amiodarone therapy versus 26 +/- 2 h in the control group (20 +/- 18 h vs. 15 +/- 9 h after excluding patients receiving OKT3), discharge arterial oxygen saturation was > 95% in both groups. Two patients in the amiodarone group with a smoking history of > 100 pack-years developed bilateral pulmonary infiltrates of brief duration. Although patients receiving amiodarone required atrial pacing more frequently (eight vs. two patients) and had a lower heart rate at discharge (75 +/- 18 vs. 86 +/- 11 beats/min), the duration of inotropic support (2.1 +/- 1.5 vs. 3.5 +/- 2.5 days) and of hospital stay (10 +/- 3 vs. 15 +/- 10 days) was not higher in the amiodarone than in the control group. The mortality rate at 30 days was similar in the two groups (6.8% vs. 3.4%, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS. Amiodarone therapy before heart transplantation may contribute to occasional pulmonary complications but does not significantly increase perioperative morbidity or mortality with the regimens used in this retrospective study.     

Pro-arrhythmic effects of amiodarone and concomitant rate-control medication.

AIMS: Amiodarone is one of the most efficient and safe antiarrhythmic drugs in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Although pro-arrhythmic effects of amiodarone therapy are rare, the aim of the present study was to identify clinical constellations which may lead to amiodarone-associated pro-arrhythmia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-three consecutive patients (pts) (49 males; 64+/-10.3 years; 35 with coronary heart disease, 17 with lone AF) were retrospectively included in this study. All received an oral (92.1%) or i.v. (7.9%) loading dose of amiodarone for the treatment of AF. Cardiac diseases, concomitant medical treatment, and incidence of pro-arrhythmic effects were analysed. Three pts (4.8% of the total population) developed a clinical relevant, polymorphic ventricular tachyarrhythmia, 3-48 h after initiation of amiodarone loading. Coronary heart disease was present in all of these pts, and in two of them left ventricular ejection fraction was severely reduced. The mean QTc in these pts was only slightly prolonged; mean heart rate was significantly decreased compared with the total study population (61.0+/-7.5 vs. 74.5+/-24.1 bpm; P < or = 0.05). In all pts with pro-arrhythmia, amiodarone (two pts i.v., one patient oral) was initiated during concomitant beta-blocker/digitalis therapy. Twenty-five per cent of the patients receiving this 'triple' therapy developed ventricular arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: The present study implies that initiation of amiodarone therapy in pts with structural heart disease and AF that are concomitantly treated with beta-blockers and digitalis may have an increased risk of amiodarone-associated pro-arrhythmia.     

Adverse effects of amiodarone therapy in adults with congenital heart disease

Objective: Amiodarone is a highly effective antiarrhythmic therapy, however its tox‐ icity profile often limits treatment. This is particularly relevant in adults with congeni‐ tal heart disease (CHD), who are often young and in whom other antiarrhythmic agents commonly fail or are contraindicated. We sought to determine incidence and predictors of adverse effects caused by amiodarone in adult CHD (ACHD).
Design: A retrospective review of patients with moderate to complex ACHD treated with amiodarone at our center between 2000 and 2017 was performed. Incidence and predictors of adverse effects were described. Efficacy of amiodarone therapy in controlling the clinical arrhythmia was assessed as complete, partial, or failed.
Results: Amiodarone was prescribed in 57 patients of 902 ACHD patients reviewed (6%), for a mean duration of 2.7 ± 4.3 years. Significant adverse effects occurred in 56%, most commonly thyroid dysfunction, with amiodarone‐induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT) in 30% and amiodarone‐induced hypothyroidism in 14%. AIT frequently led to arrhythmia exacerbation and occurred most in those with Fontan anatomy. Severe dermatological effects were seen in 7% and bradycardia requiring pacing in 5%. Interstitial lung disease, peripheral neuropathy and alopecia were observed in single cases. Amiodarone toxicity led to discontinuation of the drug in 42%. Amiodarone was highly effective when tolerated, however, achieving complete arrhythmia con‐ trol in 63%, partial control in 35%, with failure to control in only one patient.
Conclusions: Amiodarone therapy is effective in moderate to complex ACHD pa‐ tients, but is frequently limited by adverse effects. ACHD patients seem especially vulnerable to thyroid dysfunction, with Fontan patients in particular at increased risk of AIT.     

厄贝沙坦与胺碘酮联合对风湿性心脏病持续性心房颤动转复患者的窦性心律维持作用

目的 研究风湿性心脏病持续性心房颤动(房颤)应用厄贝沙坦联合胺碘酮的窦性心律(窦律)维持作用及复发的危险因素.方法 选择住院准备房颤复律且符合入选标准风湿性心脏病(风心病)瓣膜置换术后持续性房颤患者63例.随机分为对照组(31例)和试验组(32例).对照组给予胺碘酮,试验组用胺碘酮+厄贝沙坦.入选患者转复为窦律后即为试验起始时间,试验终点为转复后12个月.终点事件:症状或无症状房颤首次复发.结果 试验组窦律维持率显著高于对照组(68.7%与41.9%,P＜0.05).治疗12个月后,试验组左心房内径(LAD)显著小于对照组[(48.6±4.6)mm与(51.5±4.2)mm,P＜0.05].风心病持续性房颤复发与LAD(OR 1.242)和是否使用厄贝沙坦(OR 0.226)有关.结论 LAD是风心病持续性房颤复发的危险因素.厄贝沙坦联合胺碘酮在风心病持续性房颤复律后维持窦律的疗效优于单用胺碘酮,并能延缓左心房扩大,防止房颤复发.     

Atrial fibrillation recurrence after drug-induced typical atrial flutter ablation.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter (AFL) occurring in patients who take antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been proposed as a curative approach for AF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this technique. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients (30 males, 16 females, mean age 67 +/- 9 years) with paroxysmal or persistent AF were submitted to right atrial isthmus ablation: 1) 33 patients (group 1) in whom typical AFL spontaneously occurred during oral treatment with propafenone (n = 19), flecainide (n = 9) or amiodarone (n = 6); 2) 13 patients (group 2) submitted to electrophysiological study while taking oral propafenone (n = 3), flecainide (n = 8) or amiodarone (n = 1), in whom sustained AFL was induced (n = 9) or AF was induced and AFL was obtained by intravenous administration of class IC drugs (n = 4). The same antiarrhythmic drug which induced the conversion of AF into AFL was administered after ablation. RESULTS: During a follow-up of 20 +/- 18 months (range 1-78 months), 23 patients (50%) remained asymptomatic and free from AF recurrences. Fifteen patients (33%) with AF recurrences reported a reduction in arrhythmia-related symptoms. Eight patients (17%) did not show symptomatic improvement. These results did not significantly differ between group 1 and group 2. The duration of follow-up was significantly longer in patients with AF recurrence. Among several clinical, echocardiographic and electrophysiological parameters, only atrial enlargement and the absence of structural heart disease were independently associated with AF recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with AF and drug-induced AFL, right atrial isthmus ablation and prosecution of the drug treatment is a safe and feasible approach, which totally eliminates or reduces symptomatic AF recurrences in one half and one third of patients, respectively. However, the number of AF-free patients tends to decrease over time.     

Intravenous amiodarone for the rapid treatment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in critically ill patients with coronary artery disease

This study examined the effectiveness of intravenous amiodarone for rapid control and prevention of recurrent life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with cardiovascular collapse. In 22 critically ill patients with coronary artery disease (mean ejection fraction 27 +/- 13%), recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias proved refractory to 3.7 +/- 1.1 (mean +/- standard deviation) conventional antiarrhythmic drugs. In the 24-hour period before intravenous amiodarone treatment, patients experienced 2.4 +/- 2.3 (range 1 to 9) episodes of life-threatening ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation or both, requiring 4.0 +/- 3.9 direct current cardioversions. Within the 24 hours after initiation of intravenous amiodarone therapy (900 to 1,600 mg/day), 20 of 22 patients remained alive and had 1.1 +/- 1.6 episodes of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, requiring 1.9 +/- 3.1 direct current cardioversions. In the second 24-hour period, there were 19 survivors and life-threatening arrhythmias were reduced to 0.4 +/- 0.7 episode/patient requiring 0.4 +/- 0.9 direct current cardioversion. Overall, arrhythmias were controlled in 11 of 22 (50%) patients within the first 24 hours, and in 14 of 22 (64%) in the second 24 hours. Intravenous amiodarone therapy was well tolerated. Twelve patients were discharged from the hospital and 8 remained alive at a mean follow-up of 22 +/- 14 months. Thus, in critically ill patients, intravenous amiodarone may be useful for rapid control of spontaneous, refractory, life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias.     

Reduction of ventricular tachyarrhythmia by treatment of atrial fibrillation in ICD patients with dual-chamber implantable cardioverter/defibrillators capable of atrial therapy delivery: the REVERT-AF Study.

AIMS: The purpose of this prospective, randomized, multicentre study was to investigate whether the incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia can be reduced in standard implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) patients by implanting a dual-chamber ICD capable of atrial therapy delivery. METHODS AND RESULTS: A Jewel AF or GEM III AT ICD (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was implanted in 122 patients (62.3 +/- 10.5 years; 84.4% male; coronary artery disease 71.3%; left ventricular ejection fraction 39.7 +/- 13.6%; secondary ICD indication 91%). Overall, 31.2% of the patients had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial tachycardia (AT) before ICD implantation (n = 38). Implantable cardioverter/defibrillator therapies for AT/AF were activated and de-activated every 3 months in a cross-over study design. The mean follow-up was 18.5 +/- 7.7 months (6.29 +/- 2.2 cross-over/patient). Overall, there were 684 episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in 48.4% of patients (n = 59). In 33.6% of patients (n = 41), 532 supraventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred. Activation of ICD therapies for AT/AF did not result in a reduction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (P = 0.92). Patients with monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (mVTs) as index arrhythmia for ICD implantation or inducible mVTs in the electrophysiological study had the highest probability of recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. CONCLUSION: For patients with standard indications for ICD therapy and no indication for cardiac pacing, a dual-chamber ICD capable of atrial tachyarrhythmia treatment offers no benefit concerning a reduction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.