Influence of losigamone on the pharmacokinetics of a combined oral contraceptive in healthy female volunteers

OBJECTIVES: The influence of the new antiepileptic drug losigamone (CAS 112856-44-7/123783-52-8) on the pharmacokinetics of a combined oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol (CAS 57-63-6) and levonorgestrel (CAS 797-63-7) was investigated in 16 healthy women. METHODS: This phase I study consisted of 3 periods with an uncontrolled first period and a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over design in the second and third period. All subjects received a single dose of 200 mg losigamone (1 tablet) in period 1 (on day 14) as well as multiple doses of losigamone (3 tablets = 600 mg per day) or placebo for 15 days in periods 2 and 3. During all three periods an oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol and 150 microg levonorgestrel was given. Single-dose pharmacokinetics was investigated on day 14 of period 1. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetic investigations were performed on day 15 of periods 2 and 3. The samples were assayed to derive pharmacokinetic data of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel. In addition, the concentrations of losigamone racemate (AO-33) and its enantiomers AO-242 and AO-294 were determined in these samples. RESULTS: The mean values of the pharmacokinetic parameters AUC and Cmax of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel after multiple-dose treatment with losigamone or placebo were quite similar and met the criteria for bioequivalence. The 90% confidence intervals of the log-transformed ratios of the geometric means of the primary pharmacokinetic variables were included in the respective acceptance ranges of 80% to 125% (AUC) and 70% to 143% (Cmax). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that multiple doses of losigamone did not influence the multiple dose kinetics of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel. The single- and multiple-dose kinetics of 200 mg losigamone and its enantiomeres did not differ from each other in a significant way. The combination of losigamone and the combined oral contraceptive was well tolerated and no serious adverse events occurred. It can be stated that the antiepileptic drug losigamone and the combined contraceptive do not interact each others metabolism.     

复方孕二烯酮片剂和贴片在中国健康受试者中的群体药代动力学研究

目的评价复方孕二烯酮片剂和贴片在中国健康受试者中的群体药代动力学(PPK)特征。方法 12名健康女性受试者按照开放、平行、两周期对照研究的试验设计,分别先后给予单剂量复方孕二烯酮片剂和复方孕二烯酮贴片,血样采集后使用高效液相色谱串联质谱法测定血浆中孕二烯酮(GSD)和炔雌醇(EE)浓度,并用非线性混合效应模型(NONMEM)法对试验数据进行处理,获得群体药代动力学参数。结果复方孕二烯酮片剂中GSD和EE体内药代动力学过程均符合一级吸收和消除的二室模型,而在贴片剂型中,建模结果显示GSD应采用零级吸收、一级消除的一室模型拟合,EE则使用一级吸收和消除的一室模型拟合更为适宜。研究中未发现对片剂和贴片中GSD和EE药代动力学参数具有显著影响的协变量。结论本模型稳定性较好,能较好地描述复方孕二烯酮片剂和贴片在中国健康受试者中的药代动力学特征。     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the effect of oral doses of rizatriptan 10 mg on oral contraceptive pharmacokinetics in healthy female volunteers

Rizatriptan (MAXALT), a potent, oral 5-HT1B/1D agonist with a rapid onset of action, is available now for the acute treatment of migraine. This study examined the pharmacokinetic and clinical interaction between rizatriptan 10 mg and the components (ethinyl estradiol [EE] 35 micrograms and norethindrone [NET] 1.0 mg) of a well-established oral contraceptive combination product, ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35. Levels of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), a protein increased by EE to which NET binds, were also examined. In this two-period crossover study, 20 healthy young female subjects received a coadministration of 8 days of rizatriptan treatment (6 days of single-dose 10 mg rizatriptan and 2 days of multiple-dose rizatriptan, 10 mg q 4 hours for three doses, giving a total daily dose of 30 mg on Days 7 and 8) or matching placebo along with their daily dose (one tablet) of ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35 within their oral contraceptive cycle. Plasma was sampled for EE, NET, and SHBG concentrations. Safety evaluations included routine laboratory safety studies, physical examinations, and monitoring for ECG, vital signs, and adverse events. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters of EE or NET between the rizatriptan and placebo treatment periods, thus indicating that rizatriptan had no meaningful effect on the disposition of either the EE or the NET component of ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35. The SHBG concentration did not change throughout the entire study. Clinically, coadministration of rizatriptan with ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35 was well tolerated. Blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature showed no consistent trend or clinically important changes. Adverse events following coadministration of rizatriptan with ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35 were similar to those reported when placebo was given with ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35. The findings of this study indicate that there is little potential for dosages as high as 30 mg/day, the maximum recommended dosing schedule, of rizatriptan to alter the plasma concentrations of oral contraceptives.     

Effect of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl oestradiol and levonorgestrel in healthy volunteers

Abstract

Background:

Cytochrome P450 3 A is involved in ticagrelor and ethinyl oestradiol/levonorgestrel metabolism; so a potential drug–drug interaction may occur.     

Lack of effect of rosiglitazone on the pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives in healthy female volunteers

The effect of rosiglitazone (Avandia [BRL 49653C]) on the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and norethindrone was evaluated after repeat dosing of rosiglitazone with an oral contraceptive (OC; Ortho-Novum 1/35 containing norethindrone 1 mg and ethinylestradiol 0.035 mg) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Thirty-four healthy female volunteers received oral rosiglitazone (RSG) 8 mg + OC or matched placebo (P) + OC daily on days 1 to 14 of a 28-day OC dosing cycle; the alternate regimen was administered during a second cycle. Ethinylestradiol and norethindrone pharmacokinetics were determined from plasma concentrations on day 14. Lack of pharmacokinetic effect was prospectively defined as 90% CI for the point estimate (PE) of the ratio (RSG + OC):(P + OC) contained within a 20% equivalence range for both ethinylestradiol and norethindrone (analyzed by ANOVA). For RSG + OC and P + OC, respectively, mean ethinylestradiol AUC(0-24) was 1126 and 1208 pg.h/mL (PE: 0.92; 90% CI: 0.88-0.97), and mean norethindrone AUC(0-24) was 178 and 171 ng.h/mL (PE: 1.04; 90% CI: 1.00-1.07). Thus, rosiglitazone had no significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol or norethindrone. Coadministration of rosiglitazone with OCs does not induce metabolism of these synthetic sex steroids and is not expected to impair the efficacy of OCs or hormone replacement therapy.     

Effect of rofecoxib on the pharmacokinetics of chronically administered oral contraceptives in healthy female volunteers

The effect of rofecoxib, a highly selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norethindrone (NET), two common components of a combination oral contraceptive product, was examined. A double-blind, two-period crossover study was conducted in 18 healthy women who received ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35, a combination of EE (35 microg) and NET (1 mg), concurrently for 14 days with either 175 mg rofecoxib or matching placebo during two consecutive menstrual cycles. Plasma was sampled for EE, NET, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and albumin. The AUC(0-24 h) geometric mean ratio (GMR: rofecoxib/placebo) with corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI) of EE and NET was 1.13 (1.06, 1.19) and 1.18 (1.13, 1.24), respectively. The Cmax GMR of EE and NET was 1.06 (0.98, 1.16) and 1.04 (0.99, 1.09), respectively. In each case, the 90% CIs satisfied the predefined bioequivalence limits of (0.80, 1.25). Measures of SHBG and albumin and routine clinical and laboratory safety parameters showed no clinically meaningful changes. The addition of rofecoxib to the oral contraceptive was not associated with any clinically important changes in EE or NET pharmacokinetics and thus would not be anticipated to influence the efficacy of this contraceptive regimen.     

Influence of menstrual cycle on antipyrine pharmacokinetics in healthy Indian female volunteers.

The effect of the menstrual cycle on antipyrine pharmacokinetics was studied in 11 normal, healthy Indian female volunteers. Antipyrine half-life, apparent volume of distribution, clearance and AUC were calculated by standard methods. Results indicated that in females, antipyrine half-life was significantly longer on day 5 as compared with that on days 15 and 21 of the menstrual cycle. It appears that hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs in normal healthy females.     

Tazarotene does not affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a norethindrone/ethinylestradiol oral contraceptive

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between oral tazarotene and an oral contraceptive containing norethindrone 1mg and ethinylestradiol 0.035 mg (Ortho-Novum 1/35).DESIGN: Two separate open-label, parallel-group, single-centre, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction studies.PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven healthy women (age 20-55 years) completed Study I, with a duration of 64 days during three consecutive menstrual cycles. Ortho-Novum 1/35 was taken once daily from study day 0 (first cycle day 1) to day 61 (third cycle day 6), and oral tazarotene 1.1 mg was coadministered daily from study day 34 (second cycle day 7) to day 61. Twenty-nine healthy women (age 20-44 years) completed Study II, with a duration of 75 days during three consecutive menstrual cycles. Ortho-Novum 1/35 was taken once daily from study day 0 (first cycle day 1) to day 74 (third cycle day 19), and oral tazarotene 6 mg was coadministered daily from study day 48 (second cycle day 21) to day 74. In both studies, the pharmacokinetics of tazarotenic acid on study day 61 (third cycle day 6) were evaluated from plasma tazarotenic acid concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters of plasma norethindrone and ethinylestradiol were compared before and after tazarotene administration (cycle day 6 of the second and third cycles, respectively). Serum luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations were compared before and after tazarotene administration (cycle days 2, 4 and 6 of the second and third cycles, respectively). In Study II, serum progesterone concentrations were also determined on cycle days 18 and 20 of the second and third cycles. Tazarotenic acid was determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Ethinylestradiol and norethindrone were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. LH and FSH were assayed by microparticle enzyme immunoassay in Study I and by double-antibody radioimmunoassay in Study II. Progesterone was determined by solid-phase radioimmunoassay.RESULTS: In Study I (tazarotene 1.1 mg), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to 24 hours (AUC24) and the peak concentration in plasma (Cmax) for tazarotenic acid were 121 +/- 27 microg. h/L and 28.9 +/- 9.4 microg/L (mean +/- SD), respectively. In Study II (tazarotene 6 mg), AUC24 and Cmax for tazarotenic acid were 379 +/- 78 microg. h/L and 111 +/- 37 microg/L (mean +/- SD), respectively. In both studies, for both norethindrone and ethinylestradiol, the 90% CIs of AUC24 and Cmax on cycle day 6 before and after tazarotene administration were within the 80-125% boundary. In Study I, the 90% CIs of serum FSH and LH concentrations on cycle day 4 were within the 80-125% boundary. FSH and LH concentrations on cycle day 6 were marginally/partially outside the 80-125% boundary as a result of high variability. However, the mean FSH and LH serum concentrations on cycle day 6 of the third cycle were lower than those of the second cycle. In Study II, the 90% CIs of serum FSH, LH and progesterone concentrations were all within the 80-125% boundary, except for LH on cycle day 2. LH concentrations on cycle day 2 were marginally/partially outside the 80-125% boundary as a result of high variability. However, the mean serum LH concentration on cycle day 2 of the third cycle was lower than that of the second cycle.CONCLUSIONS: Oral tazarotene up to 6 mg once daily does not affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of Ortho-Novum 1/35.     

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of metronidazole in healthy female volunteers following either a single oral or intravenous dose

1 The plasma pharmacokinetics of metronidazole following a single dose (500 mg) of metronidazole have been investigated in a crossover study in healthy female volunteers, using assays specific for metronidazole and its metabolites 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-hydroxymethyl-5-nitroimidazole (metabolite I) and 2-methyl-5-nitroimidazole-1-acetic acid (metabolite II).

2 No systematic differences, which could be related to the route of metronidazole administration, were observed in the area under the plasma metronidazole concentration against time curve, elimination half-life, apparent volume of distribution, or total urinary excretion of metronidazole. Following a single oral or intravenous dose, the half-life estimates were 7.0 h and 7.3 h respectively.

3 No metabolite II was detected in plasma following the administration of metronidazole by either route. Urinary elimination of this metabolite appeared to be independent of the route of administration.

4 No systematic differences, which could be related to the route of administration, were observed in the apparent half-life or total urinary excretion of metabolite I. However, the area under the plasma concentration against time curve for metabolite I was significantly greater (+27%) following oral administration than following intravenous administration.

5 A single dose of metronidazole (500 mg) produced a peak plasma concentration for the drug which was in excess of the minimum inhibitory concentration of most susceptible anaerobic bacteria, and in several of the volunteers such an inhibitory concentration of metronidazole was maintained in plasma for more than 8 h following a single dose.

     

Influence of ritonavir on olanzapine pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers

HIV infection and psychotic illnesses frequently coexist. The atypical antipsychotic olanzapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2 and glucuronosyl transferases, both of which are induced by the HIV protease inhibitor ritonavir. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of olanzapine. Fourteen healthy volunteers (13 men; age range, 20-28 years) participated in this open-label study. Subjects received olanzapine 10 mg and blood samples were collected over a 120-hour post-dose period. Two weeks later, subjects took ritonavir 300 mg twice daily for 3 days, 400 mg twice daily for 4 days, and 500 mg twice daily for 4 days. The next morning, after 11 days of ritonavir, olanzapine 10 mg was administered and blood sampling was repeated. Plasma samples were analyzed for olanzapine with HPLC. We compared olanzapine noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameter values before and after ritonavir with a paired Student t test. Ritonavir reduced the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of olanzapine from 501 ng. hr/mL (443-582) to 235 ng. hr/mL (197-294) (p < 0.001), the half-life from 32 hours (28-36) to 16 hours (14-18) (p = 0.00001), and the peak concentration from 15 ng/mL (13-19) to 9 ng/mL (8-12) (p = 0.002). Olanzapine oral clearance increased from 20 L/hr (18-23) to 43 L/hr (38-51) (p < 0.001) after ritonavir. Ritonavir significantly reduced the systemic exposure of olanzapine in volunteers. Patients receiving this combination may ultimately require higher olanzapine doses to achieve desired therapeutic effects.     

Effect of the ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel combined oral contraceptive on the activity of cytochrome P4503A in obese women

AIM(S)

While it is known that CYP3A4/5 activity is decreased with combined oral contraceptive (COC) use and obesity suppresses CYP expression, the combined effects of obesity and COC use on CYP3A4/5 activity are unclear. Therefore, our aim was to examine the effect of COC usage on CYP3A4/5 activity in obese women.

METHODS

Thirty-four, obese (body mass index, BMI > 30 kg m⁻²) women of reproductive age (18–35 years old) were placed on a COC pill containing 20 µg ethinylestradiol/100 µg levonorgestrel for 21 days starting at the onset of menses. A midazolam pharmacokinetic study was conducted prior to initiation and after 21 days of COC treatment. Serial blood samples were collected and plasma concentrations of midazolam were measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a non-compartmental method.

RESULTS

Midazolam clearance, a surrogate measure of CYP3A4/5 activity, was significantly decreased upon COC use (63.3 l h⁻¹vs. 53.9 l h⁻¹, P < 0.05). A median decrease of 5.6 l h⁻¹ (95% CI −4.1, 13.3 l h⁻¹) was observed. However, the magnitude of change was similar to that reported in women with normal BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we hypothesized that obesity might amplify the impact on CYP3A4/5 activity in COC users, we found that this was not the case. This finding is reassuring regarding potential additional drug−drug interactions in obese COC users as CYP3A4/5 is a major enzyme in the metabolism of many marketed drugs.     

Influence of mexiletine on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in healthy volunteers

Preliminary reports suggest an interaction exists between theophylline and mexiletine. We conducted a two-way crossover study in 15 healthy male subjects to assess the magnitude of the pharmacokinetic interaction between mexiletine and theophylline. Twelve subjects completed 5 days of therapy on sustained-release theophylline 200 mg every 12 hours alone and 5 days of therapy with theophylline and mexiletine 150 mg every 8 hours. The two treatment periods were separated by a minimum of 7 days. On the morning of day 5 of each treatment period, blood samples for theophylline to be assayed by fluorescence immunoassay were collected over 24 hours. Mexiletine significantly increased the mean AUC, Cmax, t1/2 beta, and Cl of theophylline. Mexiletine did not affect tmax or Vd. Side effects occurred in 4 subjects during treatment with theophylline alone all of which were judged to be mild in intensity. During concomitant theophylline-mexiletine therapy, 10 subjects reported side effects of which 4 were judged to be severe, 1 moderate, and 5 mild. The magnitude of the increase in theophylline plasma concentrations induced by mexiletine as measured by AUC (0-24) was 58%, which is similar to other preliminary reports of this interaction. The authors conclude that the magnitude of the pharmacokinetic interaction between theophylline and mexiletine may be clinically significant in patients in light of the increased incidence of side effects in our healthy subjects. Theophylline dosage adjustments will be required in patients who receive concomitant mexiletine therapy.     

哌拉西林对健康男性志愿者依替米星药动学的影响

目的:探讨哌拉西林(piperacilin,PIP)对依替米星(etimicin,ETI)健康男性志愿者健康药动学的影响.方法:采用自身交叉试验,单用组:ETI 200 mg,静脉滴注;合用组:静脉推注PIP 2 g后,继之给予ETI200 mg,静脉滴注.血、尿中ETI浓度测定采用微生物法,检测菌为短小芽胞杆菌.结果:单用组和合用组的药时曲线均符合二房室开放模型,主要药动学参数如T1/2β、AUC分别为(1.9±0.4)和(1.9±0.2)h;(38±7)和(41±8)mg·h·L~(-1);12h尿药回收率分别为(56±8)％和(56±6)％.经统计学处理均无显著性差异(P>0.05).结论:两药合用时PIP对ETI健康男性志愿者药动学无明显影响.为临床两种药物合用提供了药代动力学依据.     

Influence of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in healthy volunteers

Influence of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole was evaluated by single oral administration of omeprazole capsule 20 mg (control group), or single oral administration of fluconazole capsule, 100 mg, and omeprazole, 20 mg, after 4 days of daily oral administration of fluconazole, 100 mg (treated group), to 18 healthy male volunteers. Omeprazole is extensively metabolized in the liver through 5-hydroxylation and sulfoxidation reactions catalyzed predominantly by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, respectively. Fluconazole is a potent competitive inhibitor of CYP2C19 and a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4. In treated group, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of omeprazole from time zero to time infinity (AUC) was significantly greater (3090 vs 491 ng h/ml), terminal half-life of omeprazole was significantly longer (2.59 vs 0.85 h), and peak plasma concentration of omeprazole (C(max)) was significantly higher (746 vs 311 ng/ml) than that in control group. The greater AUC and higher C(max) in treated group could be due to inhibition of omeprazole metabolism by fluconazole.     

Effect of ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl oestradiol in healthy female volunteers

Aims To assess the effects of the protease inhibitor ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl oestradiol in  healthy female volunteers.
Methods This was an open-label, single centre study in 23 subjects who received two single doses of oral contraceptive containing 50  μg ethinyl oestradiol on Day 1 (alone) and on Day 29 during concomitant ritonavir. Each subject received 16  days of every 12  h doses of ritonavir from Day 15 through Day 30. Blood samples were collected for serum ethinyl oestradiol concentrations for 48  h after each dose and for plasma ritonavir on Day 29 at 0 and 4  h postdose.
Results Statistically significant decreases in ethinyl oestradiol mean C _max (−32%) and mean AUC (−41%), and a statistically significant increase in the mean terminal elimination rate constant (+31%) were observed during concomitant ritonavir. The harmonic mean terminal half-life decreased from 17  h to 13  h during concomitant ritonavir. No statistically significant change was noted in t _max. The ratios of means (95% confidence intervals) for C _max and AUC were 0.682 (0.612–0.758) and 0.595 (0.506–0.694), respectively. The changes in ethinyl oestradiol pharmacokinetics were consistent with an increase in clearance from enzymatic induction of glucuronidation and/or cytochrome P450  hydroxylation. Mean steady-state ritonavir concentrations of 6.5 and 13.4  μg  ml⁻¹ were observed at 0 and 4  h postdose, respectively.
Conclusions Considering the extent of the decrease in ethinyl oestradiol concentrations, the use of alternate contraceptive measures should be considered when ritonavir is being administered.     

Influence of meloxicam on furosemide pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers

Fifteen healthy male volunteers participated in an open, multiple-dose study to investigate a possible interaction between furosemide and meloxicam, a new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAID). The study comprised three treatment periods. First, furosemide (40 mg) was administered as a single oral daily dose for 3 days. A wash-out day was followed by the administration of meloxicam (15 mg) as a single oral daily dose for 10 days. Thereafter, meloxicam and furosemide were administered concomitantly at the same doses as described above, for 3 days. The effect of concomitant ingestion of meloxicam and furosemide on furosemide-induced diuresis, urine and serum electrolytes, and furosemide pharmacokinetics was determined, after both single and repeated administration of furosemide. Estimates of the (furosemide + meloxicam)/(furosemide alone) mean ratio of the variable AUC(0-) for plasma furosemide and the cumulative sodium excretion (0–8 h) were 97.4% (90% confidence interval 89.7–106%) and 88% (90% confidence interval 82–94%), respectively. The study results indicate that meloxicam does not affect the pharmacokinetics of furosemide in healthy volunteers, nor does it affect furosemide-induced diuresis or serum electrolytes. The cumulative urinary electrolyte excretion after concomitant administration of meloxicam and furosemide is somewhat lower than after administration of furosemide alone, in particular for the period 0–8 h after administration of furosemide. This effect of meloxicam on furosemide dynamics is small, and is probably not clinically relevant in healthy volunteers under the dosing regime studied.