IMRT to Escalate the Dose to the Prostate while Treating the Pelvic Nodes

Background and Purpose: To assess and quantify the benefit of introducing intensity–modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) over conventional approaches to cover the pelvic nodes while escalating the dose to the prostate gland.Material and Methods: The pelvic lymphatics were planned to receive 50 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction by four–field box (4FB) technique and standard field blocks drawn on digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR), 4FB with field blocks according to the position of pelvic nodes as contoured on serial planning CT slices, or IMRT. The lateral fields included three different variations of field blocks to assess the role of various degrees of rectal shielding. The boost consisted in 26 Gy in 13 fractions delivered via six–field three–dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or IMRT. By the combination of a pelvic treatment and boost, several plans were obtained for each patient, all normalized to be isoeffective with regard to prostate–planning target volume (PTV–P) coverage. Plans were compared with respect to dose–volume histogram (DVH) of pelvic nodes/seminal vesicles–PTV (PTV–PN/SV), rectum, bladder and intestinal cavity. Reported are the results obtained in eight patients.Results: Pelvic IMRT with a conformal boost provided superior sparing of both bladder and rectum over any of the 4FB plans with the same boost. For the rectum the advantage was around 10% at V70 and even larger for lower doses. Coverage of the pelvic nodes was adequate with initial IMRT with about 98% of the volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose. An IMRT boost provided a gain in rectal sparing as compared to a conformal boost. However, the benefit was always greater with pelvic IMRT followed by a conformal boost as compared to 4FB with IMRT boost. Finally, the effect of utilizing an IMRT boost with initial pelvic IMRT was greater for the bladder than for the rectum (at V70, about 9% and 3% for the bladder and rectum, respectively).Conclusion: IMRT to pelvic nodes with a conformal boost allows dose escalation to the prostate while respecting current dose objectives in the majority of patients and it is dosimetrically superior to 4FB. An IMRT boost should be considered for patients who fail to meet bladder dose objectives.     

Feasibility of IMRT to Cover Pelvic Nodes While Escalating the Dose to the Prostate Gland: Dosimetric Data on 35 Consecutive Patients

Utilizing available dosimetric and acute toxicity data, we confirm the feasibility of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to include treatment of the pelvic nodes (PN) while escalating the dose to the prostate. Data were obtained from 35 consecutive patients with prostate cancer with ≥15% risk of PN involvement. Patients received an initial boost to the prostate, delivering 16 Gy over 8 fractions using a 6-field conformal technique, followed by an 8-field coplanar inverse planning IMRT technique delivering an additional 60 Gy over 30 fractions to the prostate (76 Gy total) and 54 Gy over 30 fractions to the seminal vesicles (SV) and PN. Dose-volume histogram analysis was performed for planning target volumes and organs at risk. Acute toxicity (RTOG/EORTC scale) was prospectively and independently scored weekly for each patient. The maximum, mean, minimum dose, and D95 to each planning target volume is provided: prostate (82.2, 78.2, 72.6, 75.2 Gy), SV (79.0, 72.5, 56.9, 61.1 Gy), and PN (80.4, 59.7, 46.5, 53.3 Gy), respectively. The percent volume receiving a dose at or above “x” Gy (Vx) was recorded for V75, V70, V65, V60, and V50 as: bladder (14%, 24%, 32%, 39%, and 54%) and rectum (3%, 18%, 26%, 34%, and 51%), respectively. Acute toxicity was as follows: 54% grade 2+ GI (n = 19), 25% grade 2+ GU (n = 9). IMRT enables treatment of pelvic nodes while escalating dose to the prostate and is clinically feasible with acute toxicity within expected ranges.     

Dose to Bone Marrow Using IMRT Techniques in Prostate Cancer Patients

Purpose:   

To investigate the dose distribution in active bone marrow of patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer and compare it to the distribution in the same patients, if they had been treated using conformal plans, in order to develop criteria for optimization to minimize the estimated risk of secondary leukemia.     

Dose to Bone Marrow Using IMRT Techniques in Prostate Cancer Patients

Purpose: To investigate the dose distribution in active bone marrow of patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer and compare it to the distribution in the same patients, if they had been treated using conformal plans, in order to develop criteria for optimization to minimize the estimated risk of secondary leukemia. Patients and Methods: Mean bone marrow doses were calculated for ten patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent whole-pelvis IMRT and compared to three-dimensional conformal (3-D CRT) plans prepared for the same patients. Also for comparison, the IMRT and 3-D CRT plans were produced to simulate the treatment of the prostate gland only. To measure the dose to extrapelvic bone marrow, three thermoluminescent diode (TLD) chips were placed in the middle of the sternum region inside the Rando phantom. Results: For both the pelvic and prostate-only volumes, the IMRT plans were superior to 3-D CRT plans in reducing the high dose volume to the rectum, the bladder and the small bowel while maintaining acceptable coverage of the planning target volume (PTV). For the pelvic treatment group the IMRT plans, compared to 3-D CRT, reduced the high dose volume (> 20 Gy) to os coxae, which is the main contributor of dose to pelvic bone marrow, but increased the middle dose volume (10–20 Gy). No statistically significant differences were observed for lower dose volumes (< 5 Gy). For the prostate-only treatment the IMRT plan increased the high dose volume and slightly decreased the low dose volume of pelvic bone marrow. However, for both treatments the leakage dose to extrapelvic sites was higher by a factor of 2 in IMRT plans. Conclusion: There are significant differences in the dose-volume histograms of bone marrow doses from 3-D CRT and from IMRT. Pronounced dose inhomogeneity reduces the risk of leukemia compared to homogeneous radiation exposure of the bone marrow. The mean bone marrow dose is therefore not a useful criterion to judge plan quality, since scattered low doses to distant sites may be more critical than the high dose volumes receiving > 10 Gy. The number of monitor units needed to deliver an IMRT plan affects leakage dose and their incorporation into planning constraints should be considered.     

Does Treatment of the Pelvic Nodes with IMRT Increase Late Rectal Toxicity over Conformal Prostate-Only Radiotherapy to 76 Gy?

PURPOSE: To compare late rectal toxicity rates after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to the prostate alone (P-3D-CRT) and whole-pelvis intensity-modulated radiotherapy along with a prostate boost (WP-IMRT/PB) to the same nominal total dose to the prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 68 patients treated with conformal radiotherapy to the prostate only to 76 Gy at the National Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, Italy, represented the first group (P-3D-CRT). The second group consisted of 45 patients treated at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, TX, USA, with IMRT covering the pelvic nodes and seminal vesicles to 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction and the prostate to 60 Gy in the same 30 fractions. A separate phase boosted the prostate to 76 Gy (WP-IMRT/PB). Major aspects of planning were remarkably similar at both institutions leaving the inclusion or not of pelvic nodes as the main treatment-related difference between the two groups. Late rectal toxicity was prospectively scored according to the RTOG scale. All patients have a 12-month minimum follow-up, and mean follow-up, similar in both groups, is 25.9 months (SD [standard deviation]: 8.4 months). RESULTS: At 2 years, the estimated cumulative incidence of grade 2 late rectal toxicity is 6%+/-4% for WP-IMRT/PB and 21.2%+/-6% for P-3D-CRT (p=0.06). The difference became significant (HR [hazard ratio]=0.1, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.0-0.6; p=0.01) at multivariate analysis. None of the patients developed grade 3+ toxicity. CONCLUSION: Despite the larger treated volume, WP-IMRT/PB allows more rectal sparing than P-3D-CRT.     

Temporary Organ Displacement to Escalate Radiation Dose to Retroperitoneal Tumors and Decrease Toxicity to Organs at Risk

PurposeTo demonstrate that temporary organ displacement (TOD) by drainage catheter placement and hydrodissection is feasible and reproducible for simulation (SIM) and stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT).Materials and MethodsBetween February 2010 and December 2018, 31 consecutive patients (20 men and 11 women; median age, 59 years; range 20–80 years) received both SIM and SBRT with TOD. The minimum required displacement was 10 mm between the gross tumor volume (GTV) and the organ at risk (OAR). Complete displacement was defined as the ability to displace the OAR from the GTV a minimum of 10 mm across the entire boundary. SIM was performed with hydrodissection on the same day. On the day of SBRT, displacement was reproduced by hydrodissection. Displacement was measured on computed tomography images of TOD, SIM, and SBRT. The drain was removed after SBRT.ResultsTOD (hydrodissection) was significantly associated with successful displacement of the OAR from a GTV greater than 10 mm (median, 20 mm vs 4.1 mm, P < .001) and maintained displacement at SIM and SBRT (SIM: 29.4 mm vs 4.1 mm, P < .001; SBRT: 32.4 mm vs 4.1 mm, P < .001). The OAR-GTV boundary showed a median reduction of 35 mm (95% confidence interval, 27.5–37.5 mm) after TOD. TOD achieved complete displacement in 22 of 31 (71%) patients, and 25 of 31 (81%) patients were able to undergo single-fraction ablative SBRT. No patients developed procedure-related complications within 30 days. SIM and SBRT were successful without OAR toxicities within a median of 33 months (range, 3–92 months).ConclusionsTOD with placement of drain and hydrodissection is technically feasible and safe and maintains displacement for SIM and SBRT.     

IMRT in a Pregnant Patient: How to Reduce the Fetal Dose?

The purpose of our study was to find a solution for fetal dose reduction during head-and-neck intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of a pregnant patient. The first step was optimization of the IMRT treatment plan with as few monitor units (MUs) as possible, while maintaining an acceptable dose distribution. The peripheral dose originating from the final IMRT plan was measured at distances reaching from the most proximal to the most distal fetal position, along the accelerator's longitudinal axis, using an anthropomorphic phantom extended with water-equivalent plastic. The measured peripheral dose was divided into leakage, and internal and collimator scatter, to find the degree to which each component influences the peripheral dose to build an appropriate shield. Collimator scatter was the greatest contributor to the peripheral dose throughout the range of the growing fetus. A shield was built and placed beneath the accelerator head, extending caudally from the field edge, to function as an extra collimator jaw. This shield reduced the fetal dose by a factor of 3.5. The peripheral dose components were also measured for simple rectangular fields and also here the collimator scatter was the greatest contributor to the peripheral dose. Therefore, the shielding used for the IMRT treatment of our patient could also be used when shielding in conventional radiotherapy. It is important for a radiation therapy department to be prepared for treatment of a pregnant patient to shield the fetus efficiently.     

Impact of Endorectal Balloon in the Dosimetry of Prostate and Surrounding Tissues in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with IMRT

The dosimetric effect of endorectal balloon repositioning or failure was assessed in 10 prostate cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Three extreme clinical scenarios were simulated by placing the balloon in the most superior and inferior positions within the rectum and by removing the balloon. Treatment planning was performed by obtaining a computed tomography (CT) image with the balloon in the most superior position (plan 1). Subsequently, the isodose lines of plan 1 were superpositioned over the anatomy of 2 other CTs, one obtained with the balloon in the most inferior position and another without the balloon (plans 2 and 3, respectively). Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the prostate and surrounding tissues were generated and compared for all 3 plans. The prescribed radiation dose to the prostate and seminal vesicles was 70 Gy in 35 fractions. Balloon repositioning resulted in significant changes only for the seminal vesicles, where the minimum doses decreased from 70.39 to 61.58 Gy, and the percent volume below 70 Gy increased from 1.62% to 8.39%. Balloon failure resulted in significant decreases in mean and minimum doses for prostate from 74.36 to 72.84 Gy and 67.62 to 50.96 Gy, respectively. Similar decreases in the mean and minimum doses were also observed for seminal vesicles from 74.21 to 64.43 Gy and 70.39 to 41.74 Gy, respectively. Balloon repositioning did not affect normal tissue doses, while balloon failure significantly decreased the upper rectum mean doses from 30.79 to 19.38 Gy. This study demonstrates that repositioning of the endorectal balloon results in increased dose inhomogeneity for seminal vesicles, while balloon failure causes significant prostate and seminal vesicle underdosing without overdosing normal tissues.     

Impact of Endorectal Balloon in the Dosimetry of Prostate and Surrounding Tissues in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with IMRT

The dosimetric effect of endorectal balloon repositioning or failure was assessed in 10 prostate cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Three extreme clinical scenarios were simulated by placing the balloon in the most superior and inferior positions within the rectum and by removing the balloon. Treatment planning was performed by obtaining a computed tomography (CT) image with the balloon in the most superior position (plan 1). Subsequently, the isodose lines of plan 1 were superpositioned over the anatomy of 2 other CTs, one obtained with the balloon in the most inferior position and another without the balloon (plans 2 and 3, respectively). Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the prostate and surrounding tissues were generated and compared for all 3 plans. The prescribed radiation dose to the prostate and seminal vesicles was 70 Gy in 35 fractions. Balloon repositioning resulted in significant changes only for the seminal vesicles, where the minimum doses decreased from 70.39 to 61.58 Gy, and the percent volume below 70 Gy increased from 1.62% to 8.39%. Balloon failure resulted in significant decreases in mean and minimum doses for prostate from 74.36 to 72.84 Gy and 67.62 to 50.96 Gy, respectively. Similar decreases in the mean and minimum doses were also observed for seminal vesicles from 74.21 to 64.43 Gy and 70.39 to 41.74 Gy, respectively. Balloon repositioning did not affect normal tissue doses, while balloon failure significantly decreased the upper rectum mean doses from 30.79 to 19.38 Gy. This study demonstrates that repositioning of the endorectal balloon results in increased dose inhomogeneity for seminal vesicles, while balloon failure causes significant prostate and seminal vesicle underdosing without overdosing normal tissues.     

前列腺癌及直肠癌对盆腔筋膜侵犯的MRI表现

目的 探讨前列腺癌及直肠癌对盆腔主要筋膜侵犯的MRI表现特点.资料与方法 回顾性分析5例前列腺肿瘤侵犯尿生殖膈及Denonvilliers筋膜患者、4例直肠肿瘤侵犯直肠系膜或直肠系膜筋膜患者的MRI表现特点.结果 肿瘤对筋膜侵犯的MRI表现可分为直接征象和间接征象,直接征象为筋膜连续性中断,局限结节样侵犯;间接征象为脂肪间隙消失,周围淋巴结肿大.结论 MRI可以清晰地显示盆腔筋膜受累情况,对确定肿瘤分期有意义.     

Biochemical Response after 3-D Conformal Radiotherapy of Localized Prostate Cancer to a Total Dose of 66 Gy

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of 3-D conformal radiotherapy (CRT) doses of /= 70 Gy should be considered. As a consequence of our earlier analysis a prospective multicenter treatment optimization protocol has been initiated in 1999. The protocol includes a risk-adapted dose increase from 70 Gy in low-risk patients to 74 Gy in high-risk patients including short-term androgen ablation.     

Influence of Rectum Delineation (Rectal Volume vs. Rectal Wall) on IMRT Treatment Planning of the Prostate

PURPOSE: To evaluate the delineation of either the rectal volume (RV) or the rectal wall (RW) in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer: influence on dose distribution to the targets and organs at risk (OARs) was investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For ten patients with localized prostate cancer IMRT treatment plans were generated with the RV, wall including the filling, and the RW without the lumen as OAR (plan-RV and plan-RW), respectively. Two different IMRT treatment- planning systems (TPS) were utilized. The influence on target coverage and sparing of OARs was investigated. RESULTS: No influence was seen on target coverage and sparing of the bladder and femoral heads. Doses to the RV were significantly reduced in plan-RV for all evaluated dose levels: maximum 26% and 17%, respectively, in both TPS. The dose distribution to the RW was not significantly different between plan-RV and plan-RW. CONCLUSION: The different delineation of the OAR rectum significantly affected the inverse IMRT treatment-planning process. The use of the RV as OAR resulted in improved dose distributions to the RV. Therefore, it is suggested using the RV as OAR in IMRT treatment planning of the prostate.     

经阴道彩色多普勒超声诊断妇科盆腔肿瘤闭孔淋巴转移的价值

目的探讨经阴道彩色多普勒超声检查在诊断妇科盆腔肿瘤闭孔淋巴结转移中的价值。资料与方法选择经组织病理活检确诊并行广泛性子宫切除+盆腔淋巴清扫术的62例妇科盆腔肿瘤患者,术前采用经阴道彩色多普勒超声检查闭孔淋巴结情况,并与手术病理结果进行对照,评价经阴道彩色多普勒超声诊断盆腔肿瘤的准确性及闭孔淋巴结转移的敏感性和特异性。结果 62例盆腔肿瘤患者中,59例超声检查结果与手术病理结果相符,诊断准确性为95.16%。19例患者病理诊断存在闭孔淋巴结转移,超声诊断16例,假阴性3例;病理诊断无转移43例,超声诊断无转移46例,假阳性3例,两者诊断闭孔淋巴结转移差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.358,P>0.05)。超声对闭孔淋巴结转移的诊断敏感性为84.21%,特异性为93.5%。结论经阴道彩色多普勒超声诊断妇科盆腔肿瘤闭孔淋巴结转移敏感性高、特异性好,具有重要的临床应用价值。