股骨重建钉治疗同侧股骨干股骨颈骨折

目的探讨应用股骨重建钉治疗同侧股骨干、股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。方法对17例同侧股骨干股骨颈骨折患者采用股骨重建钉治疗。结果术后随访12—36个月,17例股骨干骨折临床愈合时间为4—13个月,平均7个月;16例股骨颈骨折临床愈合时间为3—6个月,平均4．5个月。结论应用股骨重建钉治疗同侧股骨干、股骨颈骨折可获得良好的临床疗效,具有一定的应用价值。     

股骨重建钉治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈、股骨转子间骨折

目的探讨应用股骨重建钉内固定治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈、股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效.方法 10例使用股骨重建钉内固定治疗,对采用闭合穿钉或小切口复位穿钉手术的疗效进行回顾性分析.结果患者均获得随访,时间6～24个月.股骨颈、股骨转子间骨折平均愈合时间为5.1个月,股骨干骨折平均愈合时间为7个月,髋膝关节活动良好,无股骨头坏死征象.结论股骨重建钉是目前治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈、股骨转子间骨折有效的方法.     

股骨重建钉治疗同侧股骨干骨折合并股骨颈骨折

目的:评价Russell-Taylor股骨重建钉治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折的临床疗效.方法:对2006年11月至2010年01月有完整临床资料的13例采用Russell-Taylor股骨重建钉治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折患者进行回顾性分析.其中男10例,女3例;年龄19～55岁,平均35岁.结果:13例患者平均随访22(13～29)个月,全部股骨干和股骨颈骨折均获得骨性愈合.术后未出现股骨头缺血性坏死.无内固定物失效或感染等并发症,采用Sanders髋关节创伤后功能评分,11例优秀,2例良好.结论:采用股骨重建髓内钉治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折,效果可靠,并发症少,疗效满意.     

重建钉治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈骨折

目的:评价重建钉治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折的临床疗效及手术方法.方法:自2007年1月至2013年1月共采用股骨重建钉固定手术治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折患者13例,其中男11例,女2例;年龄25~53岁,平均38.9岁.其中股骨颈骨折依据骨折部位分为基底型10例,经颈型3例;依据Garden分型:Ⅱ型10例,Ⅲ型2例,Ⅳ型1例.股骨干骨折依据Winquist分型:Ⅰ型5例,Ⅱ型4例,Ⅲ型3例,Ⅳ型1例,骨折部位均为股骨干中上3/4.记录患者并发症及术后患肢功能恢复情况.结果:11例患者得到随访,随访时间12~36个月,平均23.45个月.受伤至手术时间平均5.9 d.1例患者出现股骨颈骨折畸形愈合,2例患者出现股骨干骨折不愈合,无感染、股骨头坏死及股骨干畸形愈合患者.依据Friedman-Wyman疗效评价标准,优良8例,一般2例,差1例.结论:股骨重建钉是股骨干合并同侧股骨颈骨折治疗中的一种良好内固定方式,具有创伤小、并发症少等优势.     

股骨重建带锁髓内钉治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈骨折

目的:探讨应用股骨重建带锁髓内钉固定治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈骨折的效果.方法:总结我院2000年9月-2004年3月间收治的股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折10例,均用股骨重建带锁髓内钉内固定.结果:所有病例随访8～36个月,平均18个月.骨折全部愈合,其中股骨干平均愈合时间为6.5个月,股骨颈骨折平均愈合时间为5.8个月.所有患者随诊时均未发现股骨头有缺血性坏死的表现,患肢关节功能优良,内固定钉无断裂.结论:应用股骨重建带锁髓内钉一套内固定装置同时固定同侧股骨干及股骨颈两处骨折部位,手术创伤小,固定牢固可靠,符合股骨的生物力学特点,有利于骨折愈合,可早期进行患肢功能锻炼,减少并发症发生,取得满意的疗效.     

股骨重建钉内固定治疗股骨转子骨折合并同侧股骨干骨折

目的观察股骨重建钉内固定治疗股骨转子骨折合并同侧股骨干骨折的临床效果。方法对16例股骨转子骨折合并同侧股骨干骨折患者应用股骨重建钉内固定治疗,回顾性分析患者的临床资料。结果本组患者均获6~36个月的随访,骨折愈合时间6~9个月,平均7.02个月。未发生股骨头坏死、感染、内固定材料断裂等。结论股骨重建钉内固定治疗股骨转子骨折合并同侧股骨干骨折,固定牢靠,愈合满意,术后并发症低。     

股骨重建钉治疗股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨转子周围骨折的疗效分析

[目的]探讨股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨转子周围骨折的股骨重建钉(RIN)内固定手术治疗方法并评估其临床效果。[方法]对2002年9月～2009年1月通过RIN手术治疗的累及同侧股骨转子周围部的37例股骨干骨折患者的治疗结果进行分析。男32例,女5例,年龄24～69岁,平均36岁。高能量损伤33例(交通事故伤26例,高处坠落伤7例),低能量损伤4例(均为运动中跌倒摔伤)。股骨干骨折发生在上1?3段13例,中1?3段18例,下1?3段6例,其中开放骨折6例(GustiloⅠ型1例,Ⅱ型5例)。股骨颈骨折按照Garden分类,Ⅱ型19例,Ⅲ型9例,Ⅳ型2例。转子间骨折按AO分类,A1.1型3例,A2.1型1例。转子下骨折按照Seinsheimer分型,Ⅰ型1例,ⅡA型2例。受伤至手术时间为4h～13d(平均3.7d)。术后进行渐进式的功能锻炼。[结果]所有患者得到14～38个月(平均24个月)随访。术后均获得骨性愈合,骨折平均愈合时间:股骨干13周,股骨颈14周,转子间12.6周,转子下15.5周。发生股骨头坏死1例。无感染、内固定断裂和松动、髋内翻及畸形愈合等并发症发生。根据Harris评分:优(91～100分)21例,良(81～90分)11例,可(71～80分)4例,差(≤70分)1例,优良率86.5%。[结论]RIN治疗股骨干骨折合并同侧转子周围骨折具有创伤小、固定可靠、骨愈合率高、并发症少和疗效好等优点,较其他方法可减少内固定数目。精心选择适应证、规范的手术操作和积极的术后康复锻炼是治疗成功的关键。     

股骨重建髓内钉治疗同侧股骨干合并转子间骨折

2006年6月～2011年6月,笔者采用闭合复位股骨重建髓内钉治疗11例同侧股骨干合并转子间骨折患者,取得满意的临床效果. 1 材料与方法 1.1 病例资料本组11例,男9例,女2例,年龄19～62岁.转子间骨折按Evans分型:ⅡA型9例,ⅡB型的2例;股骨干骨折按AO分型:A型5例,B型4例,C型2例.均为闭合骨折.伤后至手术时间2～18 d.     

股骨重建钉治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨转子周围骨折

目的评价股骨重建钉治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨转子周围骨折的疗效,并探讨其并发症及处理方法。方法1999年8月～2004年2月,采用股骨重建钉治疗14例股骨干合并同侧股骨转子周围骨折患者,受伤至手术时间平均为13 d(6～18 d)。全部采用有限扩髓、闭合复位穿钉。结果11例患者术后获16～28个月(平均22个月)随访,骨折全部愈合；完全负重时间平均20周(14～32周),愈合时间平均为10个月(5～21个月)。根据Sanders功能评分标准评定疗效：优6例,良4例,差1例。1例患肢轻度外旋,1例肢体短缩1．5 cm。髋、膝关节功能恢复满意,无髋内翻、切口感染及断钉等并发症发生。结论有限扩髓、闭合复位股骨重建钉治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨转子周围骨折具有创伤小、失血少、固定可靠及并发症少等优点,是治疗该类骨折的较好方法。     

Reconstruction nailing for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures

The surgical management of ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck and shaft presents a difficult and challenging problem for the orthopaedic surgeon. The purpose of the present study was to report the mid-term results and complications in a series of patients who sustained ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures and treated in our trauma department with a single reconstruction nail for both fractures. Eleven patients were included in the study with an average age of 46.4 years. The mean follow-up was 47 months (range, 15–75 months). There were no cases of a missed diagnosis at initial presentation. The mean time to union was 4.5 months for the neck fracture and 8.2 months for the shaft. There were no cases of avascular necrosis of the femoral head or non-union of the neck fracture. The mean Harris Hip Score was (85 ± 4.3). Complications included two cases of shaft fracture non-union and one case of peroneal nerve palsy. Heterotopic ossification at the tip of the greater trochanter was evident in two cases without causing any functional deficit. The current study suggests that reconstruction nailing produces satisfactory clinical and functional results in the mid-term. The complications involved only the femoral shaft fracture and were successfully treated with a single operative procedure.     

股骨重建钉治疗同侧股骨干股骨颈骨折

目的：分析复杂股骨骨折的临床特点，评价股骨重建钉治疗此类骨折的临床疗效。方法：对1999年6月～2003年2月有完整临床资料的14例同侧股骨干、股骨颈骨折患者进行回顾性分析。结果：14例患者中，股骨颈骨折均为基底型：Garden Ⅰ型2例，Garden Ⅱ型9例，Garden Ⅲ型3例，同时合并股骨干中上段骨折，采用股骨重建钉治疗。全部股骨干和股骨颈骨折获得骨性愈合，2例术后11个月时出现股骨头缺血性坏死。无髓内针及锁钉断裂、松动或感染等并发症。结论：采用合理可靠的内固定方法治疗同侧股骨干、股骨颈骨折，可获得满意疗效。     

Treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures

Objective：To investigate the clinical characteristics, treatment options and causes of misdiagnosis of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures.
Methods： Among 20 patients with ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures, 19 were treated operatively and 1 was treated conservatively. Sixteen cases of femoral shaft fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation with compressive plate, and 2 cases were treated with interlocking intramedullary nailing. Eighteen femoral neck fractures were treated with cannulated screws. Another patient was treated with proximal femoral nail to fix both the neck and shaft. Delayed diagnosis for femoral neck frac-tures occurred in 2 cases preoperatively. Results： A total of 19 patients were followed up. The follow up period ranged from 5 to 48 months with an average of 15 months. All the fractures were healed.
Conclusion： For case of femoral shaft fracture caused by high energy injury, an AP pelvic film should be routinely taken. Once the femoral neck fracture is recognized, operative reduction and fixation should be performed in time. Femoral neck and shaft fractures should be fixed separately.     

重建型交锁髓内钉治疗同侧股骨干伴股骨颈骨折

<正>股骨干骨折伴同侧股骨颈骨折是临床上较少见的节段性骨折,属于复杂骨折,其发生率占骨干骨折的6%[1],这类骨折的治疗方法报道很多,但最佳的治疗方法目前仍有争议。本院自2002年3月至2007年8月应用重建型股骨交锁髓内钉治疗股骨干骨折伴同侧股骨颈骨折14例,疗效满意。     

股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折手术方法的选择及疗效分析

目的 探讨股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折的手术方法及疗效.方法 2004年11月至2009年11月共收治42例股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折患者,男37例,女5例;年龄21～84岁,平均59.2岁.股骨干骨折部位:近段18例,中段17例,远段7例.股骨颈骨折按Garden分型:Ⅰ型5例,Ⅱ型10例,Ⅲ型21例,Ⅳ型6例.本组患者均于入院后3 d内确诊,无误诊及漏诊.其中20例患者行人工关节置换治疗,为关节置换组;22例患者行空心钉、髓内钉或钢板内固定,为内固定组.回顾性分析并比较两组患者的疗效.结果 42例患者术后获1～3年(平均2年)随访.股骨干骨折愈合时间为14～24周,平均18周;股骨颈骨折愈合时间为12～20周,平均16周.两组患者平均住院时间、手术时间、术中出血量、术后下床活动时间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).关节置换组术后髋关节功能优良率为95.0%,内固定组术后髋关节功能优良率为72.7%,差异有统计学意义(x2=9.251,P=0.000).两组未发生并发症的患者术后1、2、3年Merchan评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折的治疗应根据患者的体质、年龄、股骨干骨折的部位及股骨颈骨折的移位程度来确定.对于年龄较大、体质较差的患者,行人工股骨头置换术是一种较好的选择.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate clinical features,operative treatments and outcomes of ipsilateral fractures of femoral shaft and neck. Methods Forty-two cases of ipsilateral fractures of femoral neck and shaft were treated from November,2004 to November,2009 in our institution.They were 37 males and 5 females.Their ages ranged from 21 to 84 years,with an average of 59.2 years.The fracture involved 18upper shafts,17 middle shafts and 7 lower shafts.By Garden classification,there were 5 cases of type Ⅰ,10cases of type Ⅱ,21 cases of type Ⅲ,and 6 cases of type Ⅳ neck fractures.All cases were diagnosed in 3days after admission;there were no misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis.Twenty patients were treated by artificialjoint replacement(replacement group),while 22 patients by fixation with cannulated nails,intramedullary nails,or plate(fixation group).Outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Results All cases were followed up for 1 to 3 years,with an average of 2 years.Femoral neck fractures united between 12 to 20weeks,with an average of 16 weeks;femoral shaft fractures united between 14 to 24 weeks,with an average of 18 weeks.There were significant differences between the 2 groups in average length of hospital stay,ambulation time,blood loss,postoperative activities and good to excellent rate of postoperative joint function(P<0.05).There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the Merchan scores 1,2,and 3 years after operation for complication-free patients(P>0.05). Conclusion Surgical treatment of ipsilateral fractures of femoral neck and shaft depends on position of the shaft fracture,displacement of the neck fracture,physical constitution and age of the patient to be treated.     

股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折手术方法的选择及疗效分析

Objective To investigate clinical features,operative treatments and outcomes of ipsilateral fractures of femoral shaft and neck. Methods Forty-two cases of ipsilateral fractures of femoral neck and shaft were treated from November,2004 to November,2009 in our institution.They were 37 males and 5 females.Their ages ranged from 21 to 84 years,with an average of 59.2 years.The fracture involved 18upper shafts,17 middle shafts and 7 lower shafts.By Garden classification,there were 5 cases of type Ⅰ,10cases of type Ⅱ,21 cases of type Ⅲ,and 6 cases of type Ⅳ neck fractures.All cases were diagnosed in 3days after admission;there were no misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis.Twenty patients were treated by artificialjoint replacement(replacement group),while 22 patients by fixation with cannulated nails,intramedullary nails,or plate(fixation group).Outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Results All cases were followed up for 1 to 3 years,with an average of 2 years.Femoral neck fractures united between 12 to 20weeks,with an average of 16 weeks;femoral shaft fractures united between 14 to 24 weeks,with an average of 18 weeks.There were significant differences between the 2 groups in average length of hospital stay,ambulation time,blood loss,postoperative activities and good to excellent rate of postoperative joint function(P<0.05).There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the Merchan scores 1,2,and 3 years after operation for complication-free patients(P>0.05). Conclusion Surgical treatment of ipsilateral fractures of femoral neck and shaft depends on position of the shaft fracture,displacement of the neck fracture,physical constitution and age of the patient to be treated.     

Retrograde nailing with subsequent screw fixation for ipsilateral femoral shaft and neck fractures

Introduction Although ipsilateral femoral shaft and neck fractures are difficult to treat, there is still no consensus on the optimal treatment of this complex injury. We report the results of treating the 17 fractures with a standard protocol of retrograde nailing for diaphyseal fractures and subsequent screw fixation for the femoral neck fractures. Materials and methods Seventeen injuries (16 patients) sustained femoral shaft fractures, which were treated with retrograde intramedullary nails and subsequent screw fixation. Femoral neck fracture was noted before the operation in all patients except one. A femoral shaft fracture was always addressed first with unreamed retrograde nailing. Then, the femoral neck fracture was treated by cannulated screws or dynamic hip screw according to the level of fracture. Results The average time for union of femoral shaft fractures was 27.3 (14–60) weeks. Nonunion occurred in five patients, who required bone grafts or changes of fixation. The average time for union of femoral neck fractures was 11 (8–12) weeks. All united, except for one case of nonunion with avascuar necrosis, which was a Garden stage IV fracture. Functional results using Friedman–Wyman criteria were good in 16 cases, and fair in one. The only fair result was nonunion of the femoral neck, which had the joint arthroplasty. Conclusion Retrograde nailing of femoral shaft fractures can provide an easy fixation and a favorable result for ipsilateral femoral neck fractures.This study was conducted at Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, South Korea. The authors have and will not receive any financial benefit in association with the present paper.     

Treatment for ipsilateral fractures of femoral neck and shaft

Background

Concomitant ipsilateral femoral shaft and neck fractures present a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon, and no consensus has yet emerged on the optimal treatment method. We report the results of a retrospective study of 43 patients with these complex fractures who were treated at a single Level 1 trauma centre.

Patients and methods

The study participants consisted of 28 males and 15 females with a mean age of 43 years. The mean follow-up period was 48 months. Four different treatment methods were used: (1) antegrade reamed intramedullary nailing of the shaft with cancellous screw fixation of the neck, (2) dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation of the neck and low-contact dynamic compression plate (LCDCP) fixation of the shaft, (3) cancellous screw fixation of the neck and LCDCP fixation of the shaft, and (4) reconstruction nailing of both shaft and neck.

Results

No statistically significant differences in amount of blood loss, duration of surgery, total complication rate, nor clinical results were found among the four treatment methods. For femoral neck fracture, however, the complication rate of cannulated screw with antegrade intramedullary nailing fixation was 11 times that of DHS with LCDCP fixation.

Conclusions

Antegrade nail with screw fixation is not a recommended treatment method in patients with ipsilateral femoral shaft and neck fractures.     

股骨重建钉治疗同侧股骨颈、干骨折

目的 探讨使用股骨重建钉内固定治疗同侧股骨颈、干骨折的临床疗效、手术要点和围手术期注意事项。方法 对12例使用股骨重建钉治疗的疗效进行回顾性分析。手术采用闭合穿钉、闭合或小切口切开复位，用三维瞄准器锁定远骨折端，股骨颈保持15。前倾角置人2枚拉力螺纹钉。结果 11例获得随访，随访平均时间12．3个月(6～58个月)。远期疗效按马元璋评定标准：优5例，良4例，可2例，优良率81．8％，平均股骨颈骨折临床愈合时间5．2个月、股骨干骨折临床愈合时间6．7个月，一期骨折愈合率达到72．7％，其中3例术后10，12，15个月远骨折段骨延迟愈合，改为动力固定，4～6个月后骨折愈合。无股骨头坏死征象。结论 股骨颈骨折强调不切开复位，并争取解剖复位；股骨干骨折则常规闭合穿钉、小切口复位、有限扩髓、静力固定。股骨重建钉是目前治疗股骨干粉碎性骨折伴同侧股骨颈骨折的有效方法。