The insensate foot following severe lower extremity trauma: an indication for amputation?

BACKGROUND: Plantar sensation is considered to be a critical factor in the evaluation of limb-threatening lower extremity trauma. The present study was designed to determine the long-term outcomes following the treatment of severe lower extremity injuries in patients who had had absent plantar sensation at the time of the initial presentation. METHODS: We examined the outcomes for a subset of fifty-five subjects who had had an insensate extremity at the time of presentation. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the treatment in the hospital: an insensate amputation group (twenty-six patients) and an insensate salvage group (twenty-nine patients), the latter of which was the group of primary interest. In addition, a control group was constructed from the parent cohort so that the patients in the study groups could be compared with patients in whom plantar sensation was present and in whom the limb was reconstructed. Patient and injury characteristics as well as functional and health-related quality-of-life outcomes at twelve and twenty-four months after the injury were compared between the subjects in the insensate salvage group and those in the other two groups. RESULTS: The patients in the insensate salvage group did not report or demonstrate significantly worse outcomes at twelve or twenty-four months after the injury compared with subjects in the insensate amputation or sensate control groups. Among the patients in whom the limb was salvaged (that is, those in the insensate salvage and sensate control groups), an equal proportion (approximately 55%) had normal plantar sensation at two years after the injury, regardless of whether plantar sensation had been reported to be intact at the time of admission. No significant differences were noted among the three groups with regard to the overall, physical, or psychosocial scores. At two years after the injury, only one patient in the insensate salvage group had absent plantar sensation. CONCLUSIONS: Outcome was not adversely affected by limb salvage, despite the presence of an insensate foot at the time of presentation. More than one-half of the patients who had presented with an insensate foot that was treated with limb reconstruction ultimately regained sensation at two years. Initial plantar sensation is not prognostic of long-term plantar sensory status or functional outcomes and should not be a component of a limb-salvage decision algorithm.     

Hemivertebrae resection for unbalanced multiple hemivertebrae: is it worth it?

Purpose

To assess the correction effect of hemivertebra resection for unbalanced multiple hemivertebrae by measuring corresponding parameters in both coronal and sagittal planes on series posteroanterior and lateral radiographs and report the related complications.

Methods

Twelve children with unbalanced multiple hemivertebrae were operated on by hemivertebra resection through a combined anterior and posterior approach or a posterior-only procedure. Mean age at time of surgery was 9.8 years (range 2–14 years). They were retrospectively studied with a mean follow-up of 48.7 months (range 30–60 months).

Results

The mean Cobb angle of the main curve was 65.3° (range 45°–92°) before surgery and 13.8° (range 4°–30°) at the last follow-up. The correction rate was 80.0 % (range 65.5–92.4 %). The compensatory cranial curve was corrected from 25.8° (range 5°–53°) to 11.7° (range 0°–34°) with a correction rate of 65.9 % (range 33.3–100 %), and the compensatory caudal curve was corrected from 32.4° (range 17°–57°) to 7.1° (range 0°–20°) with a correction rate of 81.4 % (range 53.1–100 %). The angle of segmental kyphosis was 41.3° (range 12°–76°) before surgery and 17.0° (range ?12° to 45°) at the final follow-up. The coronal imbalance was ?1.0 cm (range ?3.5 to 3 cm) before surgery and 0.0 cm (range ?1.0 to 1.5 cm) at the most recent follow-up. The sagittal imbalance was 0.9 cm (range ?3.2 to 3 cm) before surgery and 0.6 cm (range ?3.0 to 3.5 cm) at the most recent follow-up. Complications including pedicle fractures, and pseudarthrosis were found in two patients (20 %).

Conclusions

In the patients with unbalanced multiple hemivertebrae, hemivertebra resection allows for excellent correction in both the coronal and sagittal planes, and great care should be taken to reduce the rate of complications.     

Outcome after regional anaesthesia in the ambulatory setting--is it really worth it?

Regional anaesthesia provides a continuum of perioperative care that includes perioperative pain management, decreased opioid requirements and decreased post-operative nausea and vomiting. In addition to these benefits, a wide variety of perioperative outcomes can be enhanced by utilizing regional anaesthesia in the ambulatory setting. Regional anaesthesia has been shown to improve the cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, coagulative, immunological and cognitive functions and to be of benefit in an economic context. These improvements are particularly advantageous in caring for elderly and high-risk patient populations undergoing surgery. In addition, regional anaesthesia can facilitate early recovery with excellent post-operative analgesia and few side-effects, which may decrease overall operative costs. This chapter identifies important perioperative outcomes that may be positively influenced by the use of regional anaesthesia in the ambulatory setting.     

Surveillance bronchoscopy in children during the first year after lung transplantation: is it worth it?

BACKGROUND: Since January 2002, routine surveillance bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and transbronchial biopsy has been performed in all paediatric recipients of lung and heart-lung transplants at the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK, using a newly revised treatment protocol. AIMS: To report the prevalence of rejection and bacterial, viral or fungal pathogens in asymptomatic children and compare this with the prevalence in children with symptoms. PARTICIPANTS: The study population included all paediatric patients undergoing single lung transplantation (SLTx), double lung transplantation (DLTx) or heart-lung transplantation between January 2002 and December 2005. METHODS: Surveillance bronchoscopies were performed at 1 week, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after transplant. Bronchoscopies were classified according to whether subjects had symptoms, defined as the presence of cough, sputum production, dyspnoea, malaise, decrease in lung function or chest radiograph changes. RESULTS: Results of biopsies and BAL were collected, and procedural complications recorded. 23 lung-transplant operations were performed, 12 DLTx, 10 heart-lung transplants and 1 SLTx (15 female patients). The median (range) age of patients was 14.0 (4.9-17.3) years. 17 patients had cystic fibrosis. 95 surveillance bronchoscopies were performed. Rejection (> or =A2) was diagnosed in 4% of biopsies of asymptomatic recipients, and in 12% of biopsies of recipients with symptoms. Potential pathogens were detected in 29% of asymptomatic patients and in 69% of patients with symptoms. The overall diagnostic yield was 35% for asymptomatic children, and 85% for children with symptoms (p < 0.001). The complication rate for bronchoscopies was 3.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Many children have silent rejection or subclinical infection in the first year after lung transplantation. Routine surveillance bronchoscopy allows detection and targeted treatment of these complications.     

Tolerance: is it worth the risk?

BACKGROUND: The success of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been limited by the adverse effects of immunosuppression. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of withdrawing immunosuppression in OLT recipients to achieve tolerance. METHODS: Eighteen adult OLT recipients in our steroid-free protocol without rejection were selected for this protocol. All patients chosen for this trial were on tacrolimus monotherapy with normal liver function tests (LFTs). Tacrolimus was weaned as long as LFTs remained stable. Weaning was halted for elevations of liver enzymes and tacrolimus was increased to the last dosage at which the patients had normal LFTs. Rejection was treated by increasing tacrolimus to levels of 10-15 ng/ml. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus was added if there was severe rejection by biopsy. Steroids were used if there was no improvement. RESULTS: One patient has been weaned off immunosuppression. Three additional patients were weaned completely off but had tacrolimus resumed because of mild elevations in LFTs. Eleven of 18 (61%) patients had rejection. Two patients required steroid therapy and one required rabbit antithymocyte globulin in addition to MMF and steroids. One of the patients with rejection developed diabetes and one patient had renal failure, which subsequently resolved. One patient died following a stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical tolerance can be achieved in a minority of patients, even when being maintained on minimum immunosuppression. The potential benefit of achieving tolerance must be weighed against the risks of rejection therapy in patients doing well on low-dose immunosuppression.     

Retroperitoneal approach for aortic surgery: is it worth it?

BACKGROUND: Previous reports suggest that earlier hospital discharges and reduced postoperative complications occur when a retroperitoneal approach is used for aortic surgery. Other publications refute this concept. In an effort to determine the most cost efficient method for aortic surgery in our institution, while maintaining high standards of care and outcome, we compared the retroperitoneal approach to the conventional transperitoneal aortic operation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 1995 and April 1998, 120 patients underwent aortic surgery by either the transperitoneal (n=60) or retroperitoneal approach (n=60). All patients were enrolled prospectively in a vascular registry and retrospectively reviewed. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three vascular surgeons. A clinical pathway for elective aortic surgery was developed and applied to both groups. Patients were evaluated with respect to demographics, comorbidities, preoperative risk stratification, conduct of the operative procedure, length of stay, complications, cost, clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. The indications for aortic surgery were similar in both groups - 64% for aneurysm disease and 36% for occlusive disease. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic aneurysms were included and size ranged from 4.4 to 14cm. All aortic reconstructions were done in the standard manner using knitted Dacron velour prostheses in either the aortic tube, bi-iliac or bi-femoral configuration. Statistical analysis of means and medians was accomplished using the Wilcoxin Rank-sum test and percentages were compared using Fisher's Exact test. P values less than 0.05 indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics. The incidence of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, tobacco abuse, distal lower extremity occlusive disease and the results of chemical myocardial stress evaluations were similar in both groups. Comorbidities of pre-existing renal insufficiency/failure and morbid obesity were increased in the retroperitoneal group. Five patients in the retroperitoneal group represented redo aortic surgery and there were no redo procedures in the transperitoneal group. Length of operative procedures and blood replacement requirements for both groups were similar. The transperitoneal group required 2-3l more intraoperative intravenous (IV) crystalloid than the retroperitoneal group (P<0.0001). Statistically significant reductions in ICU days, postoperative ileus and total lengths of stay were observed in the retroperitoneal group (P<0.0001). This resulted in substantial reductions in hospital costs for the retroperitoneal group (P<0.01). Postoperative complications were similar for both groups except for statistically significant increases in pulmonary edema (P<0.01) and pneumonia (P<0.001) in the transperitoneal group. Cardiac arrhythmias, primarily atrial dysrhythmias, were more frequent in the transperitoneal group but this failed to reach statistical significance (P<0.16). Combined thirty day mortality was 0.9%. Time of recovery to full activity and patient satisfaction substantially favored the retroperitoneal group. CONCLUSION: Our clinical pathway and algorithm for aortic surgery was easily followed by those patients in the retroperitoneal approach group and resulted in decreases in ICU time, postoperative ileus, volume of intraoperative crystalloid and total length of stay. The patients in the transperitoneal group often failed to progress appropriately on the pathway. Reduced hospital costs associated with aortic surgery using the retroperitoneal approach has increased the profitability for this surgery in our institution by an average of $4000 per case and has increased the value (quality/cost) of this surgery to our patients and our institution.     

Reaming during anterograde femoral nailing: is it worth it?

A systematic review was performed to assess the relative merits of reamed and unreamed antegrade femoral nailing. To be included, a study had to be prospective, randomised or pseudorandomised, comparing reamed and unreamed antegrade femoral nailing in adults. Where more than one study from the same institution was available, only the study with longest follow-up was included. A literature search found 2044 possible articles. Of these, eight studies compared reamed and unreamed femoral nailing. The methodology of these articles was independently assessed by all the three authors. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Each outcome measure tested was assessed for heterogeneity. If significant heterogeneity was present, the data were not combined. If there was no significant heterogeneity, a combined odds ratio or weighted mean difference was calculated using a fixed effects model, and a Z-test was performed to test the overall effect. Six hundred and forty-seven femoral fractures (315 reamed; 332 unreamed) were entered into the included studies. Unreamed nailing was quicker and associated with significantly less blood loss (P < 0.00001). Reaming significantly reduced the time to union (P = 0.00001), non-union (P = 0.002), delayed union (P = 0.005), technical problems (P = 0.01) and reoperation rate (P = 0.001). The use of reamed femoral nails gives significant advantages over unreamed femoral nails.     

Minimal access aortic valve replacement: is it worth it?

Controversy surrounds the use of minimal access aortic valve replacement (AVR). This meta-analytical study quantified the effects of minimal access AVR on morbidity and mortality compared with conventional AVR and evaluated study heterogeneity and robustness of the findings using sensitivity analysis. Overall, meta-analysis suggested marginal benefits in perioperative mortality (4,667 patients; odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-1.00; p = 0.05), intensive care unit stay, total hospital stay, and ventilation time in the minimal access AVR group, although cross-clamp, cardiopulmonary bypass, and total operation times were longer. Study heterogeneity and apparent benefits in perioperative mortality were related to study quality, although results for intensive care unit and hospital stay were maintained according to the sensitivity analysis. This suggests that minimal access AVR can be offered on the basis of patient choice and cosmesis rather than evident clinical benefit.     

Is it possible to train patients to limit weight bearing on a lower extremity?

Orthopedic patients are often instructed on how much weight to bear on an injured or postoperative extremity. Although specific weight-bearing instructions are given to a majority of lower-extremity orthopedic patients, the ability of patients to comply with these instructions is questioned in the medical literature. This study compared the effectiveness of new forms of clinical interventions designed to train patients on weight bearing, focusing on the use of biofeedback devices designed to offer real-time feedback to partial weight-bearing patients. Twenty healthy patients aged 20 to 30 years completed 3 interventions: (1) verbal instructions on weight bearing, (2) training with a bathroom scale, and (3) training with a biofeedback device.Patients given touchdown weight-bearing instructions (25 lb) initially bore an average of 63.57±6.24 lb when given verbal instructions. This was reduced to 44.75±5.69 lb after training with a bathroom scale (P<.001), and was further reduced to 26.2±1.57 lb with biofeedback training (P=.011). Likewise, patients given partial weight-bearing instructions (75 lb) initially bore an average of 92.28±7.85 lb. No improvement occurred with the use of a bathroom scale (at 75 lb), which showed an average of 90.82±7.19 lb (P=1.000). Training with a biofeedback device improved the average weight bearing to 69.67±3.18 lb (P=.014).Biofeedback training led to superior compliance with touchdown and partial weight-bearing instructions. Because partial weight-bearing instructions are commonly given to orthopedic patients, training with such a device may be appropriately considered.     

Primary amputation: is there still a place for it?

Diabetic foot (DF) continues to present a significant challenge to the vascular surgeon. Despite great advances in the treatment of DF, including open revascularization and endovascular techniques, significant numbers of amputations are still performed. The effect of aggressive revascularization on ultimate limb salvage rates continues to be debated. In the US the amputation rate has increased from 19 to 30 per 100000 persons years over the last two decades primarily due to an increase in diabetes and advancing age. Despite advances in cardiovascular treatment, in patients over 85 year of age an amputation rate of 140 per 100000 persons/year has been reported with a primary amputation (PA) still carrying an excessively high mortality rate of 13-17%. Amputation has been historically regarded as a life saving therapeutic measure. At the time the advances of surgical techniques in revascularization, diagnostic modalities and effectiveness in antimicrobial agents have unintentionally designated amputation to be the last treatment option. Nowadays we have a variety of therapeutic options to correct, modify, or circumvent the obstructive vascular pathology, such as angioplasty, atherectomy, stenting, stent graft and the traditional open surgical approach using endarterectomy, patch angioplasty, or bypass revascularization and even sympathectomy to enhance cutaneous perfusion to the toes. However it is understandable that many older patients who have received multiple limb preservation procedures have spent most of the remaining days of their lives in and out of the hospital or in a long-term care facility where high technical and sophisticated wound care techniques can be provided.     

Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?

Purpose

Interbody spine fusion with cages was first described by Bagby and has been performed for a long time now in a variety of different conditions. We developed a percutaneous endoscopic lumbar fusion technique based on the principles of Kambin and an original titanium cage.

Materials and methods

From 2004 to 2010, 57 patients were operated on, 17 patients were male with a mean age of 50.29 years (range 34–71 years) and 40 were female with a mean age of 57.42 years (29–90 years). Nineteen patients had a previous operation. Patients were operated on under local anaesthesia in the prone position under image intensifier and a transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic approach.

Results

Fifty cases had a bilateral cage through a bilateral endoscopic approach, and seven cases had a unilateral endoscopic approach only; of those, three cases had only one cage. Eleven patients had a contemporary posterior plate fixation at the same time of the endoscopic cage fusion. Eight patients had a postoperative radicular pain with paresthesias. Asymptomatic migration of the cages occurred in two cases and symptomatic migration requiring a conventional secondary reoperation in 13 cases after a mean delay of eight months (range three to 36 months). The mean ODI after two years or more was 34.3 % (initial ODI 69.4 %).

Conclusions

The technique was introduced in our practice to take care of difficult or grave co-morbidity patients, and some patients had excellent lasting results following a very short procedure and hospital stay. However, given the 36 % complication rate in this series, we do not recommend it unless decisive technical improvements are made.