Diagnostic Performance of CT-Guided Bone Biopsies in Patients with Suspected Osteomyelitis of the Appendicular and Axial Skeleton with a Focus on Clinical and Technical Factors Associated with Positive Microbiology Culture Results

PurposeTo assess diagnostic performance of CT-guided percutaneous needle bone biopsy (CTNBB) in patients with suspected osteomyelitis and analyze whether certain clinical or technical factors were associated with positive microbiology results.Materials and MethodsAll CTNBBs performed in a single center for suspected osteomyelitis of the appendicular and axial skeleton during 2003–2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Specific inclusion criteria were clinical and radiologic suspicion of osteomyelitis. Standard of reference was defined using outcome of surgical histopathology and microbiology culture and clinical and imaging follow-up. Technical and clinical data (needle size, comorbidities, clinical factors, laboratory values, blood cultures) were collected. Logistic regression was performed to assess associations between technical and clinical data and microbiology biopsy outcome.ResultsA total of 142 CTNBBs were included (46.5% female patients; age ± SD 46.10 y ± 22.8), 72 (50.7%) from the appendicular skeleton and 70 (49.3%) from the axial skeleton. CTNBB showed a sensitivity of 42.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.0%–53.6%) in isolating the causative pathogen. A higher rate of positive microbiology results was found in patients with intravenous drug use (odds ratio [OR] = 5.15; 95% CI, 1.2–21.0; P = .022) and elevated white blood cell count ≥ 10 × 10⁹/L (OR = 3.9; 95% CI, 1.62–9.53; P = .002). Fever (≥ 38°C) was another clinical factor associated with positive microbiology results (OR = 3.6; 95% CI, 1.3–9.6; P = .011).ConclusionsCTNBB had a low sensitivity of 42.5% for isolating the causative pathogen. Rate of positive microbiology samples was significantly higher in patients with IV drug use, elevated white blood cell count, and fever.     

Stent Graft Placement for the Treatment of Hepatic Artery Injury in Patients with Cancer: Primary Patency and Clinical Outcomes

PurposeTo evaluate the safety, primary patency, and clinical outcomes of hepatic artery stent graft (SG) placement for vascular injuries.Materials and MethodsPatients treated with hepatic arterial SG placement for vascular injuries between September 2018 and September 2021 were reviewed. Data on demographic characteristics, indication, stent graft characteristics, antiplatelet/anticoagulant use, clinical success rate, complications, and type of follow-up imaging were collected. Follow-up images were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers to assess primary patency. A time-to-event analysis was performed. The median duration of stent graft patency was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate factors related to stent graft patency.ResultsThirty-five patients were treated with hepatic arterial SG placement, 11 for postoperative bleeds and 24 for hepatic artery infusion pump catheter–related complications. Clinical success was achieved in 32 (91%) patients (95% CI, 77–98). The median primary patency was 87 days (95% CI, 73–293). Stent grafts of ≥6-mm diameter retained patency for a longer duration than that with stent grafts of smaller diameters (6 mm vs 5 mm; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14–0.88; P = .026; and 7+ mm vs 5 mm; hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09–0.83; P = .023). Anticoagulation/antiplatelet regimen was not associated with increased stent graft patency duration (P > .05). Only minor complications were reported in 2 (5.7%) patients.ConclusionsStent grafts can be used safely and effectively to treat injuries of the hepatic artery. Stent graft diameters of ≥6 mm seem to provide more durable patency.     

The Effect of Preoperative Renal Failure on Outcomes Following Infrainguinal Endovascular Interventions for Peripheral Arterial Disease

PurposeTo analyze the effect of a patient’s renal failure status on acute outcomes after lower extremity endovascular interventions for peripheral artery disease.Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgery National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2014 to 2017 was conducted. Patients were included based on current procedural terminology codes. They were divided into renal failure cohorts. Six thousand seven hundred and sixty-five patients were included in the analysis, 11.0% of whom had renal failure. A univariate analysis was performed using chi-squared test or Fischer’s exact test as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed, while controlling for relevant patient factors, to identify the effect of renal failure on several outcomes of interest after the intervention. A sensitivity analysis was performed with a propensity score-matched cohort.ResultsPatients with renal failure were more likely to have infrapopliteal interventions (38.0% vs 20.9%), critical limb ischemia with tissue loss (73.5% vs 38.9%), diabetes (70.9% vs 52.3%), preoperative wound infection (59.2% vs 30.7%), mortality (5.1% vs 1.3%), prolonged hospital stay (68.5% vs 46.5%), transfusion after the intervention (13.3% vs 9.1%), reoperation (18.3% vs 9.5%), and readmission (24.9% vs 12.6%), compared to patients without renal failure. The multivariate analysis found renal failure to be significant for mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 4.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.71–6.24), any complication (OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.72–2.39), extended length of stay (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.28–1.83), sepsis (OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.60–3.51), readmission (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.57–2.29), reoperation (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.48–2.27), major adverse cardiovascular event (OR = 3.50, 95% CI = 2.54–4.84), and major adverse limb event (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.55–2.51). P value was <.001 unless otherwise noted.ConclusionsRenal failure before the intervention places patients at a significantly elevated risk of morbidity and mortality following endovascular revascularization procedures for peripheral artery disease.     

Iatrogenic Arterioportal Fistula Caused by Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical Course and Treatment Outcomes

PurposeTo analyze the clinical course and treatment outcomes of patients with iatrogenic arterioportal fistula (APF) caused by radiofrequency (RF) ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsAmong the 1,620 hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated by RF ablation between January 2012 and August 2017, 99 who developed APF after RF ablation were included in this retrospective study. Depending on the extent of portal vein enhancement on arterial phase images, APF was classified as massive or nonmassive. The patients’ clinical course was investigated and statistically evaluated by univariable and multivariable analyses.ResultsThrombocytopenia (odds ratio [OR] = 3.939; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.141–13.598) was the only risk factor for developing massive APF. Eleven patients underwent embolotherapy (technical success rate, 90.9%) and no patients experienced serious adverse events within 30 days of the procedure. Patients with massive APF (66.7%) had a significantly higher chance of a Child-Pugh score increase than did the patients with nonmassive APF (13.6%) (P < .001). Massive APF had a significantly lower chance of natural regression than did nonmassive APF (P < .001). Child-Pugh B (OR = 17.739; 95% confidence interval, 2.361–133.279) and massive APF without treatment (OR = 11.061; 95% confidence interval, 1.257−97.341) were independent risk factors for liver failure that led to death of liver transplant within 1 year after RF ablation.ConclusionsMassive APF caused by RF ablation is mostly irreversible and significantly worsens patients’ outcomes, but may be effectively treated with embolotherapy.     

Predictors for Nonhome Patient Discharge following Lower Extremity Arterial Interventions

PurposeTo identify the variables associated with patient discharge disposition to optimize postprocedural care and discharge planning following lower extremity arterial interventions for peripheral artery disease (PAD).Materials and MethodsThe 2014–2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried using current procedural terminology codes for endovascular infrainguinal interventions for PAD. The main outcome variable of interest was nonhome discharge. Covariates included patient sociodemographic variables, age quartile (upper quartile, ≥77 years), comorbidities (diabetes, renal disease, bleeding disorder, congestive heart failure [CHF], and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), presence of an open wound before a procedure, type of procedure, operative time, symptom severity, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and baseline functional status. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed on Stata/SE 15.1.ResultsA total of 3,190 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 664 (20.8%) had nonhome discharge. Multivariate regression revealed that age (odds ratio [OR], 1.9 for the upper age quartile [>77 years]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46–2.50), operative time (OR, 1.2 per increase in quartile; 95% CI, 1.09–1.30), preoperative wound (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.24–1.90), renal failure (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.30–2.14), CHF (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.51–3.24), symptom severity (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.46–1.98), and independent functional status (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59–0.92; P = .007) were associated with nonhome discharge. All P values were ≤.001 unless otherwise stated.ConclusionsProlonged procedural time, the presence of preprocedural wound and patient comorbidities, symptomatology, and baseline functional status may be used to identify patients who will require a nonhome discharge and early discharge planning.     

Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Underwent Microwave Ablation after Downstaging with Transarterial Chemoembolization to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage A

PurposeTo compare the clinical results of microwave ablation (MWA) between patients downstaged to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage A with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and those initially classified as BCLC Stage A.Materials and MethodsFrom January 2012 to May 2017, 1,087 patients were reviewed retrospectively using propensity score matching (1:1): 86 patients underwent MWA as a curative treatment after downstaging to BCLC Stage A by TACE (downstaging group) and 86 patients initially classified as BCLC Stage A underwent MWA (control group). The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the 2 groups were compared.ResultsThe 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 95.3%, 79.1%, and 58.1%, respectively, in the downstaging group and 93.0%, 81.4%, and 61.6%, respectively, in the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.50–1.13; P = .162). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates were 80.2%, 50.0%, and 24.4%, respectively, in the downstaging group and 77.9%, 52.3%, and 27.9%, respectively, in the control group (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.76–1.53; P = .678). No significant differences were found in OS and DFS.ConclusionsThe long-term prognosis in patients with HCC who underwent MWA after downstaging to BCLC Stage A using TACE was similar to that in patients with initial BCLC Stage A.     

γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase as a Prognostic Biomarker in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization

PurposeTo evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment serum γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) level in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving transarterial chemoembolization.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included 140 patients (123 male, 17 female; mean age, 56.9 y ± 12.0; range, 22.0–82.0 y) with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer class C HCC who received first-line conventional chemoembolization between December 2013 and March 2018. Patients were divided into low and high GGT groups based on a cutoff value calculated with a receiver operating characteristic curve. Overall survival (OS) was compared between groups by log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed.ResultsThe optimal cutoff values of GGT were 119.5 U/L in men and 175.0 U/L in women. The 6-, 9-, and 12-mo OS rates were 81.7%, 72.4%, and 62.9%, respectively, for patients in the low GGT group (n = 44) and 58.8%, 35.7%, and 28.8%, respectively, for patients in the high GGT group (n = 96; P < .001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified high pretreatment serum GGT level (hazard ratio [HR], 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67–4.40; P < .001), multiple tumors (HR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.23–7.53; P = .02), and performance of target treatment (ie, sorafenib; HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24–0.72; P = .002) or ablation (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18–0.66; P = .001) as independent prognostic factors for OS.ConclusionsPretreatment serum GGT level was an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with advanced HCC treated with chemoembolization, suggesting that GGT is a useful prognostic biomarker for advanced HCC.     

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Stage I Renal Cell Carcinoma: National Treatment Trends and Outcomes Compared to Partial Nephrectomy and Thermal Ablation

PurposeTo assess use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and compare outcomes with thermal ablation and partial nephrectomy (PN).Materials and MethodsThe 2004–2015 National Cancer Database was investigated for histopathologically proven stage I RCC treated with PN, cryoablation, radiofrequency (RF) or microwave (MW) ablation, or SBRT. Patients were propensity score–matched to account for potential confounders, including patient age, sex, race, comorbidities, tumor size, histology, grade, tumor sequence, administration of systemic therapy, treatment in academic vs nonacademic centers, treatment location, and year of diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsA total of 91,965 patients were identified (SBRT, n = 174; PN, n = 82,913; cryoablation, n = 5,446; RF/MW ablation, n = 3,432). Stage I patients who received SBRT tended to be older women with few comorbidities treated at nonacademic centers in New England states. After propensity score matching, a cohort of 636 patients was obtained with well-balanced confounders between treatment groups. In the matched cohort, OS after SBRT was inferior to OS after PN and thermal ablation (PN vs SBRT, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.46, P < .001; cryoablation vs SBRT, HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.26–0.60, P < .001; RF/MW ablation vs SBRT, HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.31–0.67, P < .001). Compared with PN, neither cryoablation nor RF/MW ablation showed significant difference in OS (cryoablation vs PN, HR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.80–2.28, P = .258; RF/MW ablation vs PN, HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.95–2.55, P = .079).ConclusionsCurrent SBRT protocols show lower OS compared with thermal ablation and PN, whereas thermal ablation and PN demonstrate comparable outcomes.     

Clinical Utility of Transient Elastography in the Management of Patients with Budd-Chiari Syndrome Undergoing Endovascular Intervention

PurposeTo quantify liver stiffness measurement (LSM) changes after endovascular intervention for Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) and evaluate whether LSM changes predict restenosis after endovascular intervention.Materials and MethodsPatients with BCS who underwent endovascular intervention and had at least 2 LSM values available after the intervention were included. ΔLSM was the difference between LSMs estimated at the last and second last hospital visits. In patients with restenosis, 2 LSM values before restenosis were included. ΔLSM% was calculated as the ratio of ΔLSM to the LSM at the second last visit and expressed as a percentage. Odds ratio (OR) with confidence interval (CI) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were calculated for the predictors of restenosis.ResultsThe median baseline and postinterventional 1-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month LSM values were 47.2 kPa (33.8–68.4 kPa), 29.2 kPa (24.5–43.0 kPa), 26.2 kPa (18.6–38.9 kPa), 20.9 kPa (13.3–29.8 kPa), and 17.3 kPa (11.8–25.4 kPa), respectively. Of the 118 patients, including 67 men, restenosis developed in 10 patients after a median (interquartile range) duration of 19 months (11–46 months). ΔLSM% was higher (more positive) in patients with restenosis than in those without restenosis (44.7 [8.3–134.3] vs ?6.6 [?19.4 to 14.9], P = .001). ΔLSM% was a significant predictor of restenosis with an OR of 1.032 (95% CI, 1.015–1.050; P < .001). The AUROC for ΔLSM% was 0.831 (95% CI, 0.750–0.893; P = .001), and a ΔLSM% increment of 13.2% predicted restenosis with a sensitivity and specificity of 80.0% and 74.1%, respectively.ConclusionsLSM gradually decreases after endovascular intervention, and transient elastography is a promising test for detecting restenosis after the endovascular treatment of patients with BCS.     

Image-Guided Ablation of Recurrent or Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

PurposeTo assess the safety and effectiveness of image-guided ablation of recurrent or unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective study, 25 patients (14 women; age, 36–84 years) underwent 37 image-guided liver tumor ablation procedures to treat 47 ICCs (May 2004 to January 2022). At initial diagnosis, 20 patients had Stage 1 or 2 disease and 5 had Stage 3 or 4 disease. Before ablation, 19 (76.0%) of the 25 patients had progressed through prior treatments, including resection (n = 11), chemotherapy (n = 11), transarterial embolization (n = 3), or radiotherapy (n = 1); 6 (24.0%) of the 25 patients were treatment naïve. Ablation modality selection was based on patient and tumor characteristics and operator preference. Primary outcomes included local progression–free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS) after ablation. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsThe mean ablated tumor size was 2.0 cm ± 1.2 (range, 0.5–5.0 cm). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year LPFS rates were 84.0% (95% CI, 72.9–96.8), 73.0% (95% CI, 59.0–90.4), and 59.5% (95% CI, 41.6–85.1), respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year secondary LPFS rates were 89.5% (95% CI, 80.2–99.9), 81.9% (95% CI, 69.4–96.6), and 75.6% (95% CI, 60.2–94.9). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year LPFS rates for tumors ≤2 cm in size were all 95.8% (95% CI, 88.2–100.0). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates were 78.5% (95% CI, 63.5–97.2), 68.4% (95% CI, 51.3–91.1), and 43.5% (95% CI, 23.5–80.5). Larger tumor size was associated with decreased time to local progression (hazard ratio, 1.93; P = .012).ConclusionsPercutaneous ablation provided favorable intermediate to long-term disease control for patients with recurrent or inoperable cholangiocarcinoma.     

No Advantage of Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene and Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene–Covered Stents over Uncovered Nitinol Stents for Percutaneous Palliation of Malignant Infrahilar Biliary Obstruction: Results of a Single-Center Prospective Randomized Trial

PurposeTo prove that covered stents are more efficacious than uncovered stents regarding patency, safety, enabling of chemotherapy, and survival in percutaneous palliation of malignant infrahilar biliary obstruction.Materials and MethodsAfter failed endoscopic treatment, 154 patients with obstructive jaundice caused by unresectable infrahilar malignancy were randomly allocated to receive an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and fluorinated ethylene propylene–covered or an uncovered nitinol stent. Occlusion rate, patency, and survival were assessed. Safety and clinical success in terms of chemotherapy were compared.ResultsThree patients were excluded post hoc. Fifteen patients died within 7 d and were excluded from patency analysis. Occlusion rates were 32% (21 of 66) for covered and 29% (20 of 70) for uncovered stents (P = .7). Estimated median patency durations were 308 d (95% confidence interval [CI], 178–438 d) for covered and 442 d (95% CI, 172–712 d) for uncovered stents (P = .1). Serious adverse events (P = 1.0) and 30-day mortality (P = .5) were equivalent between groups. At hospital discharge, median bilirubin reduction of 8 mg/dL was found in both groups (P < .001). In the covered stent group, 35 patients (48%) received palliative chemotherapy, vs 29 (37%) in the uncovered stent group (P = .2). Estimated median survival times were 96 days (95% CI, 68–124 d) with covered stents and 75 days (95% CI, 42–108 d) with uncovered stents (P = .6).ConclusionsIn malignant infrahilar biliary obstruction not amenable to endoscopy, no improvement in patency or survival with percutaneously placed covered stents could be confirmed. Covered and uncovered stent types exhibit similar safety profiles and clinical success rates.     

Completeness of Reporting in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Interventional Radiology for Liver Disease

PurposeTo assess the completeness of reporting in abstracts of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing interventional radiology (IR) for liver disease; to assess whether publication of the 2017 CONSORT update for nonpharmacologic treatments (NPTs) resulted in changes in abstract reporting; and to identify factors associated with better reporting.Materials and MethodsMEDLINE and Embase were searched to identify RCTs of IR for liver disease (January 2015 to September 2020). Two reviewers assessed the completeness of abstract reporting according to the CONSORT-NPT-2017-update. The primary outcome was the mean number of CONSORT items completely reported among 10 items reported in <50% of the abstracts published in 2015. A time series analysis assessed the evolution trend over time. Moreover, a multivariate regression model was used to identify factors associated with better reporting.ResultsA total of 107 abstracts of RCTs published in 61 journals were included. Overall, 74% (45/61) of journals endorsed the main CONSORT guidelines, of which 60% (27/45) had a policy to implement them. The mean number of primary outcome items completely reported increased by 0.19 over the study period. The publication of the CONSORT-NPT update did not lead to an increase in the trend of items reported (increase of 0.04 items/month before vs 0.02 after; P = .41). Factors associated with more complete reporting were impact factor (OR = 1.13; 95% CI: 1.07–1.18) and endorsement of CONSORT with an implementation policy (OR = 8.29; 95% CI: 2.04–33.65).ConclusionsCompleteness of reporting is incomplete in abstracts of trials of IR liver disease and did not improve after publication of the CONSORT-NPT-2017 update with abstract guidance.     

Risk Factors for Early Port Infections in Adult Oncologic Patients

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate risk factors for chest port (port) infections within 30 days of placement (early port infections) in adult oncologic patients.Materials and MethodsThis single-institution, three-center retrospective study identified 1,714 patients (868 males, 846 females; median age 60.0 years old) who underwent port placement between January 2013 and August 2017. All patients received an intravenous antibiotic prior to port placement. The median absolute neutrophil count was 5,260 cells/μL, the median white blood cell (WBC) count was 7,700 cells/μL, and the median serum albumin was 4.00 g/dL at the time of port placement. Double-lumen ports were most commonly implanted (74.85%) more frequently in an outpatient setting (72.69%). Risk factors for early port infections were elucidated using univariate and multivariate proportional subdistribution hazard regression analyses.ResultsA total of 20 patients (1.2%) had early port infections; 15 patients (0.9%) had positive blood cultures. The mean time to infection was 20 days (range, 9–30 days). The port-related 30-day mortality rate was 0.2% (4 of 1,714 patients). Most bloodstream infections were attributed to Staphylococcus spp. (n = 11). In multivariate analysis, hematologic malignancy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15–5.92.; P = .02), hypoalbuminemia (albumin <3.5 g/dL; HR, 3.52; 95% CI: 1.48–8.36; P = .004), leukopenia (WBC <3,500 cells/μL; HR, 3.00; 95% CI: 1.11–8.09; P = .03), and diabetes mellitus (HR, 3.71; 95% CI: 1.57–8.83) remained statistically significant risk factors for early port infection.ConclusionsHematologic malignancy, hypoalbuminemia, leukopenia, and diabetes mellitus at the time of port placement were independent risk factors for early port infections.     

Partial Nephrectomy versus Percutaneous Cryoablation of Small Renal Cell Carcinomas: A Comparison of Adverse Events in a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

PurposeTo assess and compare complications and readmissions after partial nephrectomy and percutaneous cryoablation of cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Materials and MethodsPatients treated for cT1 RCC between 2019 and 2021 were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. Complications recorded within 30 and 90 days were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and percutaneous cryoablation was graded according to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification of adverse events. Major complications were defined as complications with a grade of ≥3 based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. Readmission within 30 days was recorded.ResultsThe cohort included 86 partial nephrectomies and 104 cryoablations. The complication rate within 90 days was 23% after partial nephrectomy and cryoablation (P = .98), with major complication rates of 3% after partial nephrectomy and 10% after cryoablation (P = .15). The readmission rates were 14% and 11% after partial nephrectomy and cryoablation, respectively (P = .48). Double-J stents were associated with overall complications (odds ratio [OR], 9.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.18–44.68; P = .003) and readmissions (OR, 5.39; 95% CI, 1.37–21.06; P = .015) after cryoablation. A high versus low radius-endophytic-nearness-anterior-location score (OR, 5.86; 95% CI, 1.08–31.81; P = .040) and endophytic location (OR, 7.70; 95% CI, 1.72–34.50; P = .008) were associated with a higher complication rate after cryoablation. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was associated with major complications after partial nephrectomy (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.05–4.30; P = .036).ConclusionsPartial nephrectomy and cryoablation are comparable regarding complications within 90 days after treatment. Tumor complexity and double-J stents were associated with complications after cryoablation, and a high CCI was associated with complications after partial nephrectomy.     

Hypertensive Crisis during Microwave Ablation of Adrenal Neoplasms: A Retrospective Analysis of Predictive Factors

PurposeTo identify risk factors for hypertensive crisis (HC) during ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave (MW) ablation of adrenal neoplasms.Materials and MethodsPatients who underwent MW ablation for adrenal tumors between April 2006 and November 2017 were retrospectively identified for this study (51 consecutive patients; 35 males, 16 females; mean age, 55 years; range, 15–85 years). A total of 77 MW ablation treatments were performed for 67 tumors (24 primary [9 pheochromocytomas, 8 adenomas, and 7 cortical carcinomas]; and 43 metastases [22 hepatocellular carcinoma, 8 renal cell carcinoma, 5 non-small cell lung cancer, 4 colorectal cancer, 3 liposarcoma, and 1 malignant fibrous histiocytoma]). The mean diameter of the adrenal tumors was 4.6 cm (range, 1.2–16.2 cm). Information about patient demographics, imaging studies, pathology and laboratory results, procedure records, and clinical outcomes was retrieved and analyzed. Statistical analysis was then performed to determine potential risk factors for HC.ResultsOf the 77 MW ablation procedures, HC occurred in 13 (16.9%). A significantly higher risk of HC was observed in patients with pheochromocytoma (odds ratio [OR], 9.037; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.731–47.172; P = .009), body mass index <24 kg/m² (OR, 5.167; 95% CI, 1.060–25.194; P = .042), dominant tumor size ≤4.5 cm (OR, 4.023; 95% CI, 1.011–16.005; P = .048), and pre-procedural systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg (OR, 0.242; 95% CI, 0.068–0.861; P = .029).ConclusionHC can occur during MW ablation in patients with either primary or metastatic adrenal tumors. Pheochromocytoma, body mass index, tumor size, and pre-procedural systolic blood pressure appear to be significant risk factors for the occurrence of HC.     

Length of Stay Predicts Risk of Early Infection for Hospitalized Patients Undergoing Central Venous Port Placement

PurposeTo compare early totally implantable central venous port catheter–related infection rates after inpatient vs outpatient placement and to determine whether the risk associated with inpatient placement is influenced by length of hospital stay.Materials and MethodsIn this single-institution retrospective study, 5,301 patients (3,618 women; mean age 57 y) underwent port placement by interventional radiologists between October 2004 and January 2018. The 30-day infection rate was compared between inpatients and outpatients using survival analysis. Among inpatients, the effect of time from admission to port placement and from placement to discharge was analyzed using a survival regression tree.ResultsThe 30-day infection rate was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.9%–6.1%) among 386 inpatients and 1.0% (95% CI = 0.7%–1.3%) among 4,915 outpatients (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.6, 95% CI = 2.0–6.6, P < .001). Inpatient placement was a significant risk factor after accounting for covariates in multivariate analysis (HR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.0–4.7, P = .05) and controlling for demographic differences by propensity score matching (HR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.0–7.8, P = .04). Infection rate was 11% (95% CI = 4.7%–22%) among 65 inpatients in whom time from admission to placement was ≥ 7 days, 5.1% (95% CI = 1.9%–11%) among 129 inpatients in whom admission to placement was < 7 days and time to discharge was > 3 days, and 0% (95% CI = 0%–2.1%) among 192 inpatients in whom admission to placement was < 7 days and time to discharge was ≤ 3 days (P < .001).ConclusionsInpatient port placement was associated with a higher risk of early infection. However, a clinical decision tree based on shorter length of stay before and after placement may identify a subset of hospitalized patients not at increased risk for infection.     

Intra-Arterial Therapy for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), conventional transarterial chemoembolization, drug-eluting embolic transarterial chemoembolization (DEE-TACE), transarterial radioembolization, and their combinations with systemic chemotherapy (SCT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.MethodsA search was conducted on Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science for prospective nonrandomized studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to June 20, 2020. Survival data of patients were recovered from original Kaplan-Meier curves by exploiting a graphical reconstructive algorithm. One-stage meta-analyses were conducted for the median overall survival (OS), survival rates (SRs), and restricted mean survival time (RMST), whereas two-stage meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to determine response rates (RRs) and conversion to resection rates (CRRs).ResultsA total of 71 prospective nonrandomized studies and 21 RCTs were identified, comprising 6,695 patients. Among patients treated beyond the first-line, DEE-TACE + SCT (n = 152) had the best survival outcomes of median OS of 26.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.5–29.1) months and a 3-year RMST of 23.6 (95% CI, 21.8–25.5) months. Upon further stratification by publication year, DEE-TACE + SCT appeared to consistently have the highest pooled SRs at 1 year (81.9%) and 2 years (66.1%) in recent publications (2015–2020). DEE-TACE + SCT and HAI + SCT had the highest pooled RRs of 56.7% (I² = 0.90) and 62.6% (I² = 0.87) and pooled CRRs of 35.5% (I² = 0.00) and 30.3% (I² = 0.80), respectively.ConclusionsAlbeit significant heterogeneity, the paucity of high-quality evidence, and the noncomparative nature of all analyses, the overall evidence suggests that patients treated with DEE-TACE + SCT have the best oncological outcomes and greatest potential to be converted for resection.     

Radiofrequency Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Awaiting Liver Transplant: An Analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients

PurposeTo evaluate differences in waitlist mortality and dropout in liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo radiofrequency (RF) ablation versus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).Material and MethodsFrom 2004 to 2013, 11,824 patients with HCC in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients who underwent RF ablation or TACE were included and followed until December 31, 2019, or 5 years, whichever came first, and were stratified by the Milan criteria. Competing risk and Cox regression analyses to compare waitlist mortality and dropout were performed using adjusted hazard ratios (asHRs, with RF ablation group as reference). Regression models were adjusted for age, race, sex, calculated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, tumor size, and number.ResultsThere was no difference in waitlist mortality and dropout for patients outside the Milan criteria (n = 1,226) who underwent TACE (19.2%) or RF ablation (19.0%) (asHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79–1.03). There was also no difference for patients inside the Milan criteria (n = 10,598) in waitlist mortality/dropout (TACE 13.4% vs RF ablation 12.9%) (asHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.79–2.09). A subgroup analysis within the Milan criteria demonstrated no difference between TACE and RF ablation treatments in patients with a single tumor of ≤3 cm (asHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77–1.10), with a single tumor of >3 cm (asHR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.79–1.34), or with >1 tumor (asHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72–1.09).ConclusionsUsing the national registry data, no difference was found in waitlist mortality and dropout for transplant candidates with HCC who received TACE versus RF ablation.     

Prognostic Factors for Local Recurrence after Cryoablation of Desmoid Tumors

PurposeTo determine the risk factors for local of adult patients treated for desmoid tumors by cryoablation.Materials and MethodsEighty-four patients treated for nonabdominopelvic desmoid tumors by cryoablation from July 2012 to July 2020 were included in a retrospective study. The population was composed of 64 women (76.19%) and 20 men (23.81%), aged from 16 to 75 years (median, 35 years ± 14.25). Each patient underwent preprocedural gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and was followed up to 36 months with the same technique. Clinical features, such as tumor size and previous treatment, epidemiological features, and the technical parameters of cryoablation, were studied.ResultsLocal relapse was found in 19 (22.62%) of 84 patients. The 12-, 24-, and 36-month progression-free survival rates were 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79–94), 74% (95% CI, 60–83), and 68% (95% CI, 53–79), respectively. In univariate analysis, significant prognostic factors associated with local recurrence were non–abdominal wall location (P = .042), debulking strategy (P = .0105), risk of visceral injury (P = .034) or peripheral nerve injury during cryoablation (P = .033), previous radiation therapy (P = .043), and treatment before 2016 (P = .008). In multivariate analysis, abdominal wall tumors displayed the best outcome, whereas the neck and trunk showed a high rate of recurrence (hazard ratio, 7.307 [95% CI, 1.396–38.261]).ConclusionsThe local recurrence of desmoid tumors after cryoablation depends on a number of prognostic factors, in particular, a non–abdominal wall location of the tumor and previous local treatment such as surgery or radiation therapy.