Embolization of the Superior Rectal Arteries versus Closed Hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson Technique) in the Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

PurposeTo compare short-term and medium-term results of superior rectal artery embolization versus surgical hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of patients with hemorrhoidal disease.Material and MethodsThis study was a prospective randomized clinical trial following 33 patients with symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease Grades 2 and 3 who were randomly assigned to 2 different groups: the superior rectal artery embolization group (n = 15) and Ferguson closed hemorrhoidectomy surgical group (n = 14). Four patients were excluded from the analysis. Pain using the visual analog scale and the use of analgesics were evaluated 3 times daily during the first 7 days of the postoperative period. Recurrent symptoms and satisfaction with treatment were also evaluated in the subsequent first, third, sixth, and twelfth months.ResultsThe mean pain during the first bowel movement after the procedure was 6.08 ± 4.41 in the surgery group and 0 in the embolization group (P = .001). The mean use of pain medication was higher in the surgery group (28.92 doses ± 15.78 vs 2.4 doses ± 5.21; P < .001). In the embolization group, the most prevalent preprocedural symptom was bleeding in 14 patients, with complete improvement in 12 (83.3%) patients. Mucus, skin tag, and pruritus were symptoms that showed little improvement in both groups. The frequency of symptoms (bleeding, pain, prolapse, and pruritus) was similar between the groups at 12 months (P = .691). No severe adverse events were observed in both groups.ConclusionsDespite no difference in outcomes, embolization of the superior rectal arteries for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease showed pain levels lower than those observed after surgical treatment.     

Outcomes of Hemorrhoidal Artery Embolization from a Multidisciplinary Outpatient Interventional Center

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of outpatient transarterial embolization for symptomatic refractory internal hemorrhoids.Materials and MethodsRetrospective analysis of 134 patients who underwent hemorrhoidal artery embolization (HAE) for symptomatic internal hemorrhoids between August 2021 and June 2022 (76 men and 58 women) was performed. The mean age was 54.9 years, with a mean Goligher hemorrhoid grade (HG) of 2.1. Branches of the superior rectal artery (SRA) or middle rectal artery supplying the corpus cavernosum recti were embolized with both spherical particles and microcoils. Standard-of-care evaluations were performed at baseline and the 1 month follow-up, which included hemorrhoid-related pain (HRP) (0–10), hemorrhoid symptoms score (HSS) (5–20), quality of life (QoL) (0–4), French bleeding score (FBS) (0–9), and HG (0–4). Clinical success was defined as improvement of symptoms without additional treatment.ResultsEmbolization of at least 1 hemorrhoidal artery was achieved in 133 (99%) of the 134 patients. The mean number of SRA branches embolized per patient was 2.9 ± 1.0. Clinical success was seen in 93% (124 of 134) of patients at the 1-month follow-up, with 10 patients requiring repeat embolization. There were significant improvements in all mean outcomes at 1 month: HSS (11–7.8; P < .01), HRP (4.1–1.3; P < .01), QoL (2.2–0.8; P < .01), FBS (4.4–2.2; P < .01), and HG (2.3–1.2; P < .05). There were no severe adverse events.ConclusionsHAE is a safe and effective outpatient treatment for refractory symptomatic internal hemorrhoids in the short term.     

Superior Rectal Artery Embolization with Tris-Acryl Gelatin Microspheres: A Randomized Comparison of Particle Size

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of superior rectal artery embolization (SRAE) with different-sized tris-acryl gelatin microspheres in symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease (HD).Materials and MethodsForty-two patients (male, 30; female, 12; median age, 45 years) with symptomatic HD (2 grade I, 8 grade II, 17 grade III, and 15 grade IV) were divided into 3 experimental arms (500–700 μm, 700–900 μm, and 900–1,200 μm groups; each had 14 patients) in a prospective randomized style to perform SRAE. Follow-up was performed by rectoscopy, clinical examination, and questionnaires. The primary outcome measure was the clinical success rate at 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were technical success rate, recurrence rate, procedure-related mortality, procedure-related complications, and any outcome changes between particle sizes.ResultsNo procedure-related deaths or major morbidities were observed. There was a 54% minor complication rate (n = 23/42) in the treated zone: 45% sustained small superficial ulcerations (n = 19/42), 7% small rectosigmoid junction ulcerations (n = 3/42), and 2% small fibrotic scar tissue (n = 1/42). The clinical success rate was 93%. Of the groups, the best French bleeding score decrease was obtained in the 900–1,200 μm group. There were improvements in the quality of life score and visual analogue scale score after the SRAE procedure, although not in the Goligher score. No recurrent disease was observed.ConclusionsSRAE with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for symptomatic HD is a safe and efficient treatment, with results favoring the use of larger microspheres.     

Catheter-Directed Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization Technique for the Management of Hemorrhoids: A Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Evidence

PurposeTo assess the efficacy and safety of a catheter-directed hemorrhoidal dearterialization technique for the management of hemorrhoidal bleeding.Materials and MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of pubmed, cochrane, and scopus databases was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Clinical studies reporting on catheter-directed hemorrhoidal dearterialization for rectal bleeding were analyzed.ResultsFourteen studies (n = 362) were identified. The mean maximum follow-up duration was 12.1 months (SD, 7.31; range, 1–28; median, 12), and the mean length of hospital stay was 1.5 days (SD, 1.1; range, 0–2.5). The mean technical success was 97.8% (SD, 3.5), and the mean clinical success was 78.9% (SD, 10.5). A statistically significant reduction in the french bleeding score before and after embolization was noted (P = .004). In subgroup analysis, when the coils-only group was compared with the coils and particles group, the average rebleeding rate was 21.5% (n = 111; SD, 18.2; range, 0%–44%) versus 10.05% (N = 108; SD, 4.8; range, 5%–15.7%), respectively (P < .0001). No bowel ischemia/necrosis or anorectal complications were reported.ConclusionsThe current preliminary clinical evidence suggests that catheter-directed hemorrhoidal dearterialization is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of hemorrhoidal bleeding. The standardization of the technique and the generation of higher level evidence will be required to compare this minimally invasive procedure with more invasive surgical options for patients with grades I–III hemorrhoids and chronic bleeding.     

Management of Symptomatic Vascularized Retained Products of Conception by Proximal Uterine Artery Embolization with Gelatin Sponge Torpedoes

PurposeTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of temporary proximal uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of highly vascularized retained products of conception (RPOCs).Materials and MethodsThis retrospective analysis included women who underwent treatment for vaginal bleeding after abortion, miscarriage, or delivery, with highly vascularized RPOCs detected by Doppler ultrasound (US) (ie, presence of an enhanced myometrial vascularity, a low resistance index of <0.5, and a peak systolic velocity of ≥0.7 m/s). A unilateral or bilateral embolization with torpedoes of gelatin foam was performed. From November 2017 to January 2021, 24 women with a median age of 30 years (interquartile range, 26.0–34.5 years) with symptomatic highly vascularized RPOCs were included. Clinical success was defined as bleeding arrest between the UAE and 1-month follow-up. Technical success was defined as the complete obstruction of at least 1 uterine artery supplying vascular abnormalities. The safety of the procedure according to the classification of the Society of Interventional Radiology and evolution of lesions on US were also reported.ResultsTechnical success was achieved in all 24 (100%) patients, with bilateral arterial embolization in 19 (79%) patients and unilateral embolization in 5 (21%) patients. Clinical success was achieved in all 24 (100%) patients. Five patients still had uterine retention at the 1-month follow-up, including 2 patients with highly vascularized RPOCs. Two patients benefited from hysteroscopy, and 3 had noninvasive management. Four minor adverse events were reported (1 patient had infectious endometritis and 3 patients had a postembolization syndrome).ConclusionsProximal UAE with torpedoes of gelatin foam is safe and effective for the management of symptomatic highly vascularized RPOCs.     

Safety Profile of Particle Embolization for Treatment of Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

PurposeTo assess ischemic adverse events following particle embolization when used as a second-line embolic to coil embolization for the treatment of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB).Materials and MethodsThe single-institution retrospective study examined 154 procedures where embolization was attempted for LGIB. In 122 patients (64 men; mean age, 69.9 years), embolization was successfully performed using microcoils in 73 procedures, particles in 34 procedures, and both microcoils and particles in 27 procedures. Particles were used as second-line only when coil embolization was infeasible or inadequate. Technical success was defined as angiographic cessation of active extravasation after embolization. Clinical success was defined as the absence of recurrent bleeding within 30 days of embolization.ResultsTechnical success for embolization of LGIB was achieved in 87% of the cases (134/154); clinical success rate was 76.1% (102/134) among the technically successful cases. Clinical success was 82.2% (60/73) for coils alone and 68.9% (42/61) for particles with or without coils. Severe adverse events involving embolization-induced bowel ischemia occurred in 3 of 56 (5.3%) patients who underwent particle embolization with or without coils versus zero of 66 patients when coils alone were used (P = .09). In patients who had colonoscopy or bowel resection within 2 weeks of embolization, ischemic findings attributable to the procedure were found in 3 of the 15 who underwent embolization with coils alone versus 8 of 18 who underwent embolization with particles with or without coils (P = .27).ConclusionsParticle embolization for the treatment of LGIB as second-line to coil embolization was associated with a 68.9% clinical success rate and a 5.3% rate of ischemia-related adverse events.     

Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Benign Chronic Inflammatory Joint Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory joint pain via systematic review and meta-analysis.Materials and MethodsMEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies reporting outcomes in patients with chronic inflammatory joint pain treated with TAE. Meta-analyses of pain score changes, changes in proportions of patients on analgesic medications, range of motion changes, technical success rates, and adverse events rates were performed. Subgroup analyses were conducted with respect to pain site (knee versus shoulder).ResultsFourteen observational studies, which included 346 patients, were reviewed. The pooled technical success rate was 95.8%, and no major adverse events were observed. The pooled mean difference in pain score at 1 week was 3.1. At 1, 3, and 6 months, the difference in score was 4.0, 4.2, and 5.1, respectively. At 1 year, the difference was 5.5. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that shoulder embolization was associated with greater reduction of pain than knee embolization at 3 and 6 months (P < .001 and P = .018, respectively), whereas there was no significant difference between the sites at 1 month (P = .734). The pooled proportions of patients on analgesic medication at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 81.1%, 36.3%, 42.3%, 28.2%, and 22.4%, respectively. The pooled estimated increase in the range of motion among patients who underwent shoulder embolization was 55.6° for anterior elevation and 64.7° for abduction.ConclusionsTAE is an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with chronic inflammatory joint pain.     

Transarterial Embolization of Neovascularity for Refractory Nighttime Shoulder Pain: A Multicenter,Open-Label,Feasibility Trial

PurposeTo assess the feasibility of transarterial embolization (TAE) for recalcitrant nighttime shoulder pain in a multicentric study.Materials and MethodsThis prospective, open-label, feasibility trial included 100 patients treated at 5 institutions. TAE was performed in 76 patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC) and 24 patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears (sRCTs). The ipsilateral radial artery was punctured, and imipenem/cilastatin sodium was infused as an embolic agent. Adverse events, 10 point pain numerical rating scale (NRS), range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder joint, and quality of life (via the EuroQol-5D [EQ-5D]) were evaluated.ResultsAll patients exhibited neovascularity on baseline angiography, and all TAE procedures were performed successfully. No patient experienced a major adverse event. The mean nighttime pain NRS scores at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after TAE were 6.4 ± 2.2, 3.4 ± 2.6, 2.3 ± 2.5, and 1.6 ± 2.2, respectively (for all, P < .001). The mean ROM of anterior elevation at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after TAE were 97° ± 29°, 119° ± 28°, 135° ± 27°, and 151° ± 17°, respectively (for all, P < .001). The mean EQ-5D scores at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after TAE were 0.63 ± 0.17, 0.73 ± 0.16, 0.80 ± 0.17, and 0.84 ± 0.17, respectively (for all, P < .001). There was no significant difference in the clinical success rate between the AC and sRCT groups.ConclusionsTAE for nighttime shoulder pain caused by AC and sRCTs was feasible with sufficient safety and efficacy.     

Risk Factors Associated with Clinical Failure of Uterine Artery Embolization for Postpartum Hemorrhage

PurposeTo identify risk factors for clinical failure of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), with particular attention to the uterine artery diameter.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included 47 patients who underwent UAE for PPH between January 1, 2010, and January 31, 2021. Technical success was defined as the completion of embolization of the arteries thought to be the cause of the bleeding. Clinical success was defined as no recurrent bleeding or need for additional therapeutic interventions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the risk factors associated with clinical failure of UAE.ResultsOf the 47 patients, 6 had recurrent bleeding. Of the 6 patients, 4 underwent hysterectomy, and 2 underwent repeat embolization. The clinical success rate was 87.2% (41/47), with no major adverse events such as uterine infarction or death. In univariate analysis, there were slight differences in multiparity (P = .115) and placental abruption (P = .128) and a significant difference in the findings of a narrow uterine artery on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (P = .005). In multivariate analysis, only a narrow uterine artery on DSA was a significant factor (odds ratio, 18.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.5–134.8; P = .004).ConclusionsA narrow uterine artery on DSA was a risk factor for clinically unsuccessful UAE for PPH. It may be prudent to conclude the procedure only after it is ensured that vasospasm has been relieved.     

Clinical Outcomes of Transarterial Embolization for Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy Refractory to Conservative Treatment: A Pilot Study

PurposeTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of transarterial embolization (TAE) for chronic Achilles tendinopathy (AT) refractory to conservative treatment.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included 20 patients (12 men and 8 women; mean age, 30.3 years) who received TAE using imipenem/cilastatin sodium for refractory chronic AT from May 2019 to April 2021. Nine patients had bilateral involvement. A total of 29 procedures were performed (8 for nonathletes and 21 for athletes). If feasible, embolization was performed superselectively of the arterial branch demonstrating hypervascularity, early venous drainage, and/or supplying the pain site noted using a radiopaque marker. The visual analog scale (VAS, 0–10) score was used to assess pain symptoms at baseline and during the follow-up period (1 day; 1 week; 1, 3, and 6 months; and open period). Clinical success was defined as a decrease of >50% in the VAS score at 6 months when compared with baseline.ResultsIn 25 (86.2%) of 29 procedures, clinical success was achieved. Significant decreases in the VAS scores were noted at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months (6.86 at the baseline vs 3.48, 3.41, 3.10, 2.55, and 1.62, respectively; all P < .01). For patients available for the 12- and 24-month follow-ups (n = 19 and 6, respectively), the mean VAS scores significantly decreased (6.84 vs 2.00 and 7.33 vs 1.17, respectively; all P < .01). No serious adverse events were observed during follow-up.ConclusionsTAE may alleviate pain for patients with chronic AT refractory to the conservative treatment with a low risk of adverse events.     

Safety and Efficacy of Peripheral Embolization with EASYX Liquid Embolic Agent: A Multicenter Prospective Study

PurposeTo evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of EASYX, a new nonadhesive precipitating liquid embolic agent based on a polyvinyl alcohol ether polymer labeled with iodine molecules, for peripheral embolization.Materials and MethodsThis open-label prospective multicenter study was conducted on 50 consecutive patients treated with embolization using EASYX in 3 academic hospitals from April 2018 to July 2019. Indications for embolization were symptomatic varicocele (n = 15), type II endoleak (n = 8), acute hemorrhage (n = 16), portal vein embolization (PVE; n = 9), or angiomyolipoma (AML; n = 2). Patient characteristics, technical and clinical success rates, pain at injection, and satisfaction of the interventional radiologists were assessed. Follow-up imaging was performed using ultrasound for varicoceles (at 1 month) and computed tomography (CT) for the other indications (at 3 or 6 months).ResultsThe immediate technical success rate was 98%. The clinical success rates were 100% for acute hemorrhage and type II endoleaks, 89% for PVE, 86% for varicoceles, and 50% for AMLs. Patients who underwent PVE showed significant hypertrophy of the future liver remnant at follow-up (P < .001), and 55.6% of patients proceeded to hepatectomy. The absence of artifacts on imaging allowed improved monitoring of the aneurysmal sac in patients with type II endoleaks. The satisfaction rate of the interventional radiologists was >90% for 5 of 7 items.ConclusionsEASYX as a novel copolymer liquid embolic agent was safe and efficient for peripheral embolization. The absence of tantalum allowed reduced CT artifacts on imaging follow-up, which was especially useful in patients with type II endoleaks.     

Comparative Outcome Analysis of N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Embolization of the False Lumen Versus Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Aortic Dissection

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) embolization for the treatment of aortic dissection.Materials and MethodsIn this single-center retrospective study conducted from February 2003 to June 2019, NBCA embolization of an aortic false lumen was attempted in 12 patients (median age, 59 y; range, 41–68 y) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed in 53 patients (median age, 59 y; range, 37–70 y) for aortic dissection with one or more indications of persisting pain, malperfusion, rupture or impending rupture, maximal aortic diameter ≥ 55 mm, and/or rapid aortic enlargement. The main exclusion criterion for embolization was the presence of fast blood flow in the aortic false lumen on aortography. The efficacy of NBCA embolization and TEVAR was compared by evaluating technical and clinical outcomes, repeat intervention–free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsTechnical success was achieved in 11 of the 12 patients treated with NBCA embolization (91.7%), and clinical success was achieved in 9 of these 11 (81.8%). No significant difference was found between embolization and TEVAR in clinical success rates (embolization, 81.8%; TEVAR, 84.9%; P = .409) or procedure-related complications (embolization, 1 patient [8.3%]; TEVAR, 4 patients [7.5%]; P = .701). In addition, embolization showed comparable 5-y RFS (embolization, 82.5% ± 9.3; TEVAR, 85.5% ± 4.8; P = .641) and 5-y OS (embolization, 100%; TEVAR, 95.4% ± 3.2; P = .744) rates to TEVAR.ConclusionsNBCA embolization of the false lumen in aortic dissection seems to be a safe and effective treatment modality for the closure of false lumen in selected patients.     

Safety and Effectiveness of Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol Copolymer Embolization of Peripheral High-Flow Arteriovenous Malformations: Results of a Prospective Study

PurposeTo prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) copolymer–based embolic agent in the treatment of symptomatic peripheral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).Materials and MethodsThis prospective single-center study evaluated EVOH embolization with 3 different formulations of EVOH (Squid Peri 12 cP, 18 cP, and 34 cP; BALT Germany GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany) in patients with symptomatic AVMs. Between April 2018 and October 2019, 36 embolization procedures in 21 patients (3 males and 18 females; mean age, 34.7 years) were performed (inclusion criteria: symptomatic peripheral AVM, ≥14 years of age, and elective embolization). Symptoms, technical aspects (transarterial, transvenous, or percutaneous approach; plug or balloon occlusion), clinical and technical success (defined as the improvement of symptoms and complete angiographic eradication of the AVM nidus), adverse events, and short-term outcomes were assessed.ResultsThe mean volume of the embolic agent used per session was 3.4 mL of EVOH 34 cP (standard deviation [SD], ± 5.4), 6.2 mL ± 8.1 of EVOH 18 cP, and 4.6 mL ± 10.1 of EVOH 12 cP. Angiographic success was achieved in 18 patients (85.7%). The mean follow-up was 190 days (range, 90–538 days; median, 182 days). In the follow-up assessment, findings of magnetic resonance imaging showed that 19 patients (90.5%) had a persistent state of devascularization compared with postinterventional angiography. Amelioration or complete elimination of pain was achieved in 90.0% of the patients. One patient experienced a major adverse event; minor adverse events developed in 2 patients.ConclusionsIn this study, EVOH appeared to be a safe and effective embolic agent in peripheral AVMs and had a low rate of adverse events in a limited number of patients.     

Short-Term Effects of Genicular Artery Embolization on Symptoms and Bone Marrow Abnormalities in Patients with Refractory Knee Osteoarthritis

PurposeTo evaluate the short-term outcomes of genicular artery embolization (GAE) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) with and without bone marrow lesion (BML) and/or subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee (SIFK).Materials and MethodsThis single-institution prospective observational pilot study analyzed 24 knees in 22 patients with mild to moderate knee OA, including 8 knees without BML, 13 knees with BML, and 3 knees with both BML and SIFK. The area and volume of BMLs on magnetic resonance images were measured before and after GAE. Baseline and postoperative pain and physical function were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).ResultsGAE significantly reduced the BML area and volume 3 months after embolization in the knees with BML (both P < .0005). GAE significantly decreased the VAS scores at 3 and 6 months after embolization in patients without BML (both P = .04) and those with BML (both P = .01). GAE also lowered the WOMAC scores 3 months after embolization in patients without and with BML (P = .02 and P = .0002, respectively). However, GAE did not significantly alter the BML area and volume (both P = .25), VAS scores (P = 1.00), and WOMAC scores (P = .08) in patients with BML and SIFK at 3 months after GAE.ConclusionsThis observational pilot study suggested that GAE effectively reduces the BML area and volume and improves pain and physical function in patients with knee OA accompanied by BML but is inefficacious in those with both BML and SIFK.     

Outcome of Rectal Arterial Embolization for Rectal Bleeding in 34 Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study over 20 Years

PurposeTo report the efficacy of rectal artery embolization (RAE) for the treatment of rectal bleeding and the prognostic factors related to recurrent bleeding.Materials and MethodsA total of 34 patients in a single center who underwent RAE for treatment of rectal bleeding between September 1998 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Procedure details including angiographic findings and embolic materials used, technical success rate, bleeding control rate during hospital stay, major adverse event rate, and prognostic factors associated with recurrent bleeding were evaluated.ResultsTechnical success rate was 97.1% (33 of 34). Bleeding control during hospital stay was achieved in 64.7% of patients (n = 22). The most common bleeding focus was in the superior rectal artery. Recurrent bleeding occurred in 11 patients. Incomplete initial angiography with only an inferior mesenteric or internal iliac angiogram had been performed in 90.9% of patients with recurrent bleeding (10 of 11) and 52.2% of patients with bleeding control (12 of 23; P = .053). The use of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate was related to a significantly lower incidence of recurrent bleeding (P = .014), whereas coagulopathy (P = .001) and transfusion of > 10 U of packed red blood cells (PRBCs; P = .003) were related to higher recurrent bleeding rates. One patient had a puncture site–related complication, and no bowel infarction was noted during follow-up.ConclusionsRAE was feasible and safe. The use of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, presence of coagulopathy, and transfusion of > 10 U of PRBCs were significant factors related to recurrent bleeding. Bilateral inferior mesenteric artery and internal iliac artery angiography is highly recommended in the initial RAE session to achieve a high rate of bleeding control.     

Percutaneous MR Imaging-Guided Laser Ablation and Cryoablation for the Treatment of Pediatric and Adult Symptomatic Peripheral Soft Tissue Vascular Anomalies

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided laser ablation and cryoablation for the treatment of symptomatic soft tissue vascular anomalies (VAs) of the trunk and extremities.Materials and MethodsAn institutional review board-approved retrospective review was undertaken of all pediatric and adult patients who underwent MR imaging-guided and monitored laser ablation and/or cryoablation for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral soft tissue VA. Preablation and postablation MR imaging was independently reviewed. Pain scores on the visual analog scale (0 to 10) and self-reported subjective symptomatic improvement were assessed. Change in VA size and pain scores were compared using a paired t test.ResultsThirty patients (24 females; age, 10–75 years) with 34 VAs were treated for moderate to severe pain (n = 27) or swelling/mass effect (n = 3) with 60 total ablation sessions. The baseline maximum VA diameter was 9.5 cm ± 8.6. At baseline, all VAs (100%) demonstrated variable T2-weighted signal hyperintensity and enhancement. The baseline pain score was 6.4 ± 1.6. Clinical follow-up was available for 23 patients. At a mean follow-up time of 12.2 months ± 10.1, 19 of 20 (95%) patients treated for pain and 2 of 3 (67%) patients treated for swelling/mass effect reported partial or complete symptomatic relief. There was a significant decrease in the postablation pain scores (−5.7 ± 1.0, P < .001) and maximum VA size (−2.3 cm ± 2.7, P = .004), with >50% reduction in VA T2 signal (59%) and enhancement (73%). Nine of 30 (30%) patients experienced minor complications.ConclusionsMR imaging-guided and monitored percutaneous laser ablation and cryoablation appear to be safe and effective for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral soft tissue VAs.     

Results from a United States Investigational Device Study of Adhesive Capsulitis Embolization in the Treatment of Shoulder Pain: The Adhesive Capsulitis Embolization Study

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of arterial embolization to relieve shoulder pain secondary to adhesive capsulitis (AC).Materials and MethodsIn total, 20 patients (18 females, 2 males; mean age, 51 years) with AC resistant to >30 days of conservative treatment were enrolled in a multicenter prospective study. Adhesive capsulitis embolization was performed with 75-μm or 200-μm spherical particles. Subjects were assessed before and after the procedure with magnetic resonance imaging, visual analog scale (VAS; 0–100 mm) scores, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE; 0–100) scores, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES; 0–100) scores. Adverse events were recorded at all follow-up time points.ResultsHypervascularity was identified and embolization was technically successful in all patients, with 83 arteries embolized in 20 patients. Baseline VAS, SANE, and ASES scores before the procedure were 89.2 mm, 27.2, and 30.9, respectively. The 1-month (n = 19), 3-month (n = 18), and 6-month (n = 12) follow-ups demonstrated significant improvements. At the 1-month follow-up, VAS score decreased by 31.8 (P = 1.2E?11), SANE score increased by 22.1 (P = 1.8E?8), and ASES score increased by 14.2 (P = 4.3E?5). At the 6-month follow-up, VAS score decreased by 62.1 (P = 7.0E?11), SANE score increased by 55.4 (P = 4.1E?10), and ASES score increased by 44.5 (P = 1.8E?6). Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the study ended early; 6 patients did not complete the 6-month follow-up. No major adverse events were noted.ConclusionsInterim findings suggest that arterial embolization is safe and effective for patients with AC refractory to conservative treatment.     

Multicenter Randomized Sham Controlled Study of Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Pain Secondary to Osteoarthritis

PurposeTo assess the safety and efficacy of genicular artery embolization (GAE) compared with a sham procedure in the treatment of knee pain secondary to mild to moderate osteoarthritis (OA).Materials and MethodsA multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate knee OA symptom reduction after GAE versus sham procedure. Subjects (n = 21) with mild to moderate OA and intractable knee pain were randomized 2:1 to either GAE or a sham procedure. Subjects who were randomized to the sham procedure and did not report clinical improvement in both the total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were unblinded and able to crossover to treatment at 1 month. Longitudinal data were collected for 12 months, and subjects were excluded if they required additional analgesics at follow-up. Reductions in the VAS and total WOMAC scores were compared using mixed-effects linear regression models.ResultsAll subjects in the sham group failed to show significant improvements at 1 month and crossed over to the treatment arm. There was a statistically significantly greater pain reduction in the treatment group than in the sham group at 1 month (VAS, 50.1 mm; standard error [SE], 10.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 29.0, 72.3; P<.01). Disability improvement was also significantly greater in the treatment group (WOMAC, 24.7 points; SE, 10.4; 95% CI, 3.5, 45.9; P=.02). Only minor adverse events were reported. Five subjects were excluded after increased analgesic use. Sensitivity analysis with all excluded patients confirmed significant improvements at 1 and 12 months.ConclusionIn patients with mild to moderate knee OA, GAE results in symptomatic improvement greater than the sham procedure with clinically significant reduction in pain and disability.     

Cryoneurolysis in Patients with Dorsal Neuropathic Pain Secondary to Tumor Invasion

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryoneurolysis (CNL) in patients with refractory thoracic neuropathic pain related to tumor invasion.Materials and MethodsBetween January 2013 and May 2017, this single-center and retrospective study reviewed 27 computed tomography-guided CNLs performed on 26 patients for refractory thoracic neuropathic pain related to tumor invasion. Patients with cognitive impairment were excluded. Pain levels were recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS) before the procedure, on days 1, 7, 14, 28 and at each subsequent follow-up appointment. CNL was clinically successful if the postprocedural VAS decreased by 3 points or more. To determine the duration of clinical success, the end of pain relief was defined as either an increased VAS of 2 or more points, the introduction of a new analgesic treatment, a death with controlled pain, or for lost to follow-up patients, the latest follow-up appointment date with controlled pain.ResultsTechnical success rate was 96.7% and clinical success rate was 100%. Mean preprocedural pain score was 6.4 ± 1.7 and decreased to 2.4 ± 2.4 at day 1; 1.8 ± 1.7 at day 7 (P < .001); 3.3 ± 2.5 at day 14; 3.4 ± 2.6 at day 28 (P < .05). The median duration of pain relief was 45 days (range 14–70). Two minor complications occurred.ConclusionsCryoneurolysis is a safe procedure that significantly decreased pain scores in patients with thoracic neuropathic pain related to tumor invasion, with a median duration of clinical success of 45 days.     

Association between Baseline Osteoarthritic Features on MR Imaging and Clinical Outcome after Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Osteoarthritis

PurposeTo explore the association between baseline osteoarthritis (OA)-related magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features and pain reduction after genicular artery embolization (GAE) in patients with mild-to-moderate symptomatic knee OA resistant to conservative therapy.Materials and MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of patients with mild-to-moderate symptomatic knee OA treated with GAE using imipenem-cilastatin sodium. The clinical outcome was scored at baseline and 6 months after treatment using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). MR images were scored using the MR imaging osteoarthritis knee score. Linear regression was used to evaluate associations of before-treatment MR imaging scores with WOMAC_pain and WOMAC_total reduction after 6 months.ResultsFifty-four patients (22.2% male; median age, 69.4 years; median WOMAC_pain at baseline, 12) were evaluated. Of all OA features scored, a higher cartilage full-thickness defect score showed the strongest association with less reduction of both WOMAC_pain (B,?0.63 [95% confidence interval (CI), ?0.91 to ?0.34]; P < .001) and WOMAC_total scores (B, ?1.77 [95% CI, ?2.87 to ?0.67]; P < .001) following treatment. The presence of grade 2–3 effusion synovitis (B, ?2.99 [95% CI, ?5.39 to ?0.60]) bone marrow lesions (B, ?0.52 [95% CI, ?0.86 to ?0.19]), osteophytes (B, ?0.21 [95% CI, ?0.36 to ?0.06]), and cartilage defect surface area score (B, ?0.25 [95% CI ?0.42 to ?0.08]) all showed a significant association with less WOMAC_pain reduction (all P < .05).ConclusionsIn patients with mild-to-moderate symptomatic knee OA treated with GAE, the presence and severity of full-thickness cartilage defects, effusion synovitis, bone marrow lesions, osteophytes, and cartilage surface area scores at baseline are associated with less favorable clinical outcomes at 6 months.