Phase II study of sequential administration of docetaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a sequential administration of four cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) followed by four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC; 60/600 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks), with subsequent consolidation with docetaxel or AC, as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients received 443 cycles of chemotherapy (median, 11 cycles/patient; range, 1 to 13 cycles). A total of 267 cycles of docetaxel (60.3%) and 176 of AC (39.7%) were given. Consolidation therapy was given to 33 patients (29 with docetaxel). RESULTS: Grade 4 neutropenia was the most frequent toxicity (83% of patients). This was not cumulative and was rarely complicated by febrile neutropenia or severe infection. The nonhematologic safety profile was favorable: there were no grade 4 adverse events, and grade 3 episodes were infrequent. Docetaxel-specific toxicities were generally not severe. With a median cumulative doxorubicin dose of 397 mg/m(2) (range, 150 to 543 mg/m(2)), two incidences of unrelated congestive heart failure after further treatment with anthracyclines and two of asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction decrease were observed. Among the 42 assessable patients, five (12%) had complete and 25 (60%) had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 71% (95% confidence interval, 55% to 84%). Median duration of response was 53 weeks (range, 12 to 72 weeks), and median time to progression was 46 weeks (range, 3 of 72 weeks). With a median follow-up of 40.4 months, median survival was 32 months (range, 2 to 55 months). CONCLUSION: This docetaxel-based sequential schedule is safe and effective in first-line therapy for MBC, without incurring cumulative toxicity, and provides a feasible chemotherapeutic option in this clinical setting.     

Phase II study of concurrent administration of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent administration of doxorubicin and docetaxel, without prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: This multi-institutional study enrolled 40 women; 37 were assessable for efficacy and all 40 patients were evaluated for toxicity. Treatment consisted of 50 mg/m(2) doxorubicin and 60 mg/m(2) docetaxel on day 1 every 3-4 weeks. RESULTS: Patients received a total of 251 cycles of chemotherapy (median, 5 cycles; range, 1-13 cycles). Of the 37 patients assessable for efficacy, 2 had a complete response and 24 had partial responses, which accounted for a 70% objective response rate (95% confidence interval, 53-84%). The median time to treatment failure was 30.1 weeks (range, 3.3-80.7 weeks). Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 88% of patients and was the most frequent haematological toxicity. Febrile neutropenia was seen in 40% of patients, but no severe infections were observed. Non-haematological toxicity was generally tolerable. There were 2 grade 4 adverse events, which included 1 bleeding duodenal ulcer and 1 hypersensitivity reaction, but grade 3 episodes were infrequent. None of the patients developed congestive heart failure or asymptomatic decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction to less than 50%. Fluid retention syndrome 相似文献   

A phase II study of sequential docetaxel followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

This phase II study assessed the activity and toxicity profile of the sequential administration of 3 cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) followed by 3 cycles of AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide; 60/600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) as first-line chemotherapy in 30 patients with metastatic breast cancer. The response rate was 60% after docetaxel and 73% after AC. This reflected an increase in the rate of complete response (from 7% after docetaxel to 17% after AC). The median duration of response was 10.5 months, and the median time to progression was 12.6 months. The median survival time had not been reached after a median follow-up of 23.2 months. The sequential treatment was generally well tolerated, with grade 3/4 neutropenia found in 20% and 14% of patients treated with docetaxel and AC, respectively. No cumulative myelosuppression was detected. The incidence of grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities was low. The sequential administration of docetaxel followed by AC showed a high antitumor activity and a good safety profile. The hematologic toxicity found is markedly lower than that found using concomitant chemotherapy with the same drugs. Our results support the design of phase III trials that directly compare a sequential schedule with a concomitant schedule of docetaxel plus AC (or with doxorubicin only), focusing on the toxicity profile.     

Phase I study of docetaxel in combination with cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

This phase I was study conducted to establish the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, and recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Twenty-six patients were treated with cyclophosphamide (600 mg m(-2), intravenous bolus) followed by docetaxel (60, 75 or 85 mg m(-2), 1-h intravenous infusion) every 3 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose was docetaxel 85 mg m(-2) with cyclophosphamide 600 mg m(-2), the dose-limiting toxicity being febrile neutropenia. Grade 4 neutropenia was experienced by all patients, but was generally brief. Otherwise, the combination was well tolerated with few acute and no chronic non-haematological toxicities of grade 3/4. Activity was observed at all dose levels and disease sites, and the overall response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval 22-61%). The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were not modified by cyclophosphamide coadministration. These findings establish a recommended dose of docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) in combination with cyclophosphamide 600 mg m(-2) every three weeks for phase II evaluation.     

Combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) and doxorubicin have previously demonstrated a significant antitumor activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Furthermore, a lack of cross resistance and overlapping toxicities between the two agents have been reported. In a prospective study, docetaxel (80 mg/m2, 1-hr iv infusion) and doxorubicin (60 mg/m2, 1-hr iv infusion) were administered as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients to evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of the combination. Forty-three patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 47 years (range, 30-69). The docetaxel-doxorubicin combination was applied with 3-week intervals until progression. Complete response was achieved in 9 (21.4%) of 42 assessable patients and partial response in 24 (57.2%) patients, for an overall response rate of 78.6%. Median response duration was 8 months (3-18 months). Nausea and vomiting (76%), alopecia (64%), neutropenia (35.7%) and mucositis (33%) were the major side effects of the combination. There was one case of cardiac toxicity. In conclusion, the docetaxel-doxorubicin protocol can be considered as an active regimen for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer with acceptable toxicity and a fairly high response rate.     

Phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) and docetaxel as first-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the activity and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD; Caelyx) and docetaxel combination as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with a median age of 63 years were treated with PLD 30 mg/m(2) (day 1) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (day 2) every 3 weeks for six cycles. Recombinant human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (rhG-CSF) could be used in patients with grade > or =3 neutropenia after the first cycle. RESULTS: Forty-two of 44 patients were assessable for response. The response rate (RR) was 64.3% (95% confidence interval 49.8% to 78.8%). Six patients (14.3%) achieved complete response (complete disappearance of all measurable and assessable disease lasting at least 4 weeks, no new lesions, no disease-related symptoms), partial response was observed in 21 patients (50%) > or =50% decrease of measureable disease lasting at least 4 weeks, no progression of assessable disease, no new lesions, no disease-related symptoms), eight patients had stable disease and seven patients progressive disease. Median disease-free and overall survival were not reached, but were in excess of 17 months (range 6-17 months). Twenty of the patients had received previous adjuvant chemotherapy (10 with epirubicin-containing regimen with a median cumulative dose of 400 mg/m(2)). Grade > or =3 neutropenia occurred in 18.4% and neutropenic fever in 9% of patients. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia was observed in four patients. Dose reduction was necessary in seven patients. Two patients discontinued treatment: one due to prolonged grade 3-4 neutropenia and one due to neurotoxicity. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PLD and docetaxel achieved high RRs with acceptable toxicity as first-line treatment in MBC.     

A randomized phase II study of alternating and sequential regimens of docetaxel and doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of alternating and sequential regimens of docetaxel and doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with MBC requiring first-line chemotherapy for progressive disease (n = 106) were randomized and received 3-weekly monotherapy with docetaxel (T, 100 mg/m2, 1-h i.v. infusion) and doxorubicin (A, 75 mg/m2, 20-30-min i.v. infusion) either on a cycle-by-cycle alternating basis (ATATATAT, n = 51) or sequentially each for four cycles (TTTTAAAA, n = 55). RESULTS: For both regimens, the median number of cycles administered was the maximum of eight. The alternating and sequential groups achieved similar objective tumor response rates (60% and 67%, respectively) and similar median duration of response (47 and 44 weeks, respectively). With a median follow-up of 31 months, median survival times were estimated at 20 and 26 months in the alternating and sequential groups, respectively. No unexpected toxicities were reported. Compared with alternating therapy, patients receiving sequential therapy were more likely to complete the planned eight chemotherapy cycles (69% versus 63%), and had a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia (2% versus 14%). CONCLUSIONS: Alternating and sequential docetaxel-doxorubicin regimens are viable alternatives to simultaneous combination therapy in MBC, with sequential therapy achieving slightly higher response rates and improved tolerability compared with alternating therapy.     

Phase II trial of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety profile, including the risk for cardiac toxicity, of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (TLC D-99), fluorouracil (5-FU), and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one women were registered in this phase II study. All patients had measurable disease and no previous chemotherapy for MBC. Treatment consisted of TLC D-99 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 on day 1 and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Serial cardiac monitoring, including endomyocardial biopsies, was performed. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 73% (95% confidence interval, 57% to 86%). The median duration of response was 11.2 months, the median time to treatment failure was 8.1 months, and the median overall survival duration was 19.4 months. The median number of cycles per patient was 10. The median cumulative dose of TLC D-99 was 528 mg/m2. Ten patients required hospitalization for febrile neutropenia. Nausea/vomiting, stomatitis, and fatigue higher than grade 2 occurred in 12%, 15%, and 41% of patients, respectively. Twenty-one patients reached a cumulative doxorubicin dose greater than 500 mg/m2. Three patients (7%) were withdrawn from the study due to protocol-defined cardiac toxicity, two because of a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction to < or = 40%, and one because her endomyocardial biopsy result was grade 1.5. One patient had congestive heart failure that was probably nonanthracycline related. CONCLUSION: This chemotherapy regimen, including TLC D-99, was highly active against MBC and associated with low cardiac toxicity despite high cumulative doses of doxorubicin.     

Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

Background and purpose:Anthracycline-containing regimens arewidely used in advanced breast cancer. However, there is a need for new,non-anthracycline regimens that are active in patients for whom anthracyclinesare contraindicated. The aim of this study was to determine the maximumtolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and recommendeddoses of docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients withmetastatic breast cancer. The pharmacokinetics of both drugs was alsoevaluated. Patients and methods:Thirty-four women with first-line metastaticbreast cancer were treated with docetaxel, 60–100 mg/m² (day1), and vinorelbine, 20–22.5 mg/m² (days 1 and 5), repeatedevery three weeks and administered on an outpatient basis. Results:Two MTDs were determined: MTD1 was defined at the doselevel using docetaxel 75 mg/m², and vinorelbine 22.5mg/m²; DLT being a grade 3 stomatitis that was more related to thedose of vinorelbine than that of docetaxel. Therefore, the study continuedwith a fixed dose of vinorelbine, 20 mg/m², and docetaxel85–100 mg/m². MTD2 was defined at the dose level combiningdocetaxel, 100 mg/m², and vinorelbine, 20 mg/m²; DLTswere grade 3 stomatitis and severe asthenia. Fluid retention was observed in41% of patients but was never severe or a reason for patientdiscontinuation. In comparison with historical experience, Daflon 500® didnot seem to increase the efficacy of the three-day corticosteroidpremedication by further reducing the incidence or severity of fluidretention. No significant neurotoxicity was observed and no patientdiscontinued the study due to this site effect. Activity was observed at alldose levels and at all metastatic sites, with an overall response rate of71% (95% CI: 52.0%–85.8%). The median timeto progression was 31.4 weeks (95% CI: 12–48 weeks) and mediansurvival was 15.6 months (95% CI: 2.6–26.6 months). Thepharmacokinetics of docetaxel and vinorelbine were not modified between day1 and day 3 when the two drugs were combined with the day 1 administrationschedule used in this study. Conclusion:The recommended doses for phase II studies aredocetaxel, 75 mg/m² (day 1), plus vinorelbine, 20 mg/m²(days 1 and 5), repeated every three weeks. At these doses, the combinationwas found to be active and well tolerated.     

Vinorelbine and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a combination of vinorelbine (VNR) and docetaxel (DOC) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 40 women with untreated metastatic breast cancer with visceral (85%) and bone (70%) metastases. Of the 40 patients, 24 (60%) had previously received adjuvant chemotherapy, which had included anthracyclines in 12 patients (30%). Treatment consisted of VNR 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 5, and DOC 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 3 weeks. Depending on the neutrophil nadir (grade 3 or 4 neutropenia by WHO criteria) recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micro g/kg on days 2-4 and 6-13 was given for all subsequent treatment cycles. RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% (95% confidence interval, CI 15-65). Six patients (15%) achieved a complete response (CR) and ten patients (25%) achieved a partial response (PR). Stable disease (SD) was observed in six patients (15%), and 18 patients (45%) had progressive disease (PD). The median duration of response was 8 months and the median predictive time to progression (TTP) was 6 months. The main toxicity was neutropenia grade 3 and 4 in 28 patients (70%). Febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization occurred in 12 patients (30%). Grade 3 or 4 anemia was seen in two patients (5%) and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in one patient (2.5%). Severe nonhematologic toxicity, except alopecia, was uncommon and included stomatitis in two patients (5%), vomiting in two (5%) and diarrhea in one (2.5%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of VNR and DOC at the doses used in this study showed moderate activity as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Neutropenia was considerable despite G-CSF administration.     

A Phase I study of docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide in solid tumors followed by a Phase II study as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: In Phase I, the purpose was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (DC) with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of patients with solid tumors. For Phase II, the purpose was to determine the safety and efficacy of this combination as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In Phase I (45 patients), docetaxel was escalated from 60 mg/m(2) to 85 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide from 600 mg/m(2) to 800 mg/m(2). Pharmacokinetic evaluation of docetaxel was performed in 19 patients with MBC. In Phase II (34 patients), patients received cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)) followed by docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)), i.v. RESULTS: In Phase I, the dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia-related events. The maximum tolerated dose for DC was 75 mg/m(2)/700 mg/m(2) in solid tumor patients treated previously and 75 mg/m(2)/800 mg/m(2) for patients not treated previously for MBC. Dose escalation of docetaxel >75 mg/m(2) was not tolerated, despite prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment. In Phase II, 71% of patients received prior anthracycline therapy. Neutropenic fever requiring i.v. antibiotics occurred in 6 patients (19%). One patient had grade 3 neuropathy. There was no cardiotoxicity. The overall Phase II intent-to-treat objective response rate was 65% (complete responses, 12%). The median overall survival was 22 months, and the median time to progression was 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: DC combination therapy is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity and is appropriate regardless of prior anthracycline therapy. In view of the high activity and lack of cardiotoxicity, this combination warrants additional investigation in early stage breast cancer and in combination with trastuzumab.     

Phase III trial of liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide compared with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the efficacy and tolerability of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet) and epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: One hundred and sixty anthracycline-na?ve metastatic breast cancer patients were randomised to receive Myocet (M; 75 mg/m(2)) or epirubicin (E; 75 mg/m(2)) in combination with cyclophosphamide (C; 600 mg/m(2)), every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. OUTCOME MEASURES: Response (overall response = complete + partial response rates), time to disease progression, overall survival and cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction). RESULTS: Overall response rates were 46% and 39% for MC and EC treatment, respectively (P=0.42). MC was superior to EC with respect to median time to treatment failure (5.7 versus 4.4 months; P=0.01) and median time to disease progression (7.7 versus 5.6 months; P=0.02). Median survival times were 18.3 and 16.0 months for MC and EC, respectively (P=0.504). Unsurprisingly, given an equimolar comparison, neutropenia and stomatitis/mucositis were significantly more common in patients who received MC. However, there was less injection site toxicity with MC. Both treatments showed a low incidence of cardiotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Myocet appears to be an acceptable alternative to epirubicin as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer because it combines the dose-effect reliability of doxorubicin with the level of safety provided by epirubicin.     

A randomized phase II study of combination, alternating and sequential regimens of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of doxorubicin and docetaxel (DOC) administered either as a combination, an alternating or a sequential regimen in women with metastatic breast cancer. Secondary objectives included overall response, time to progression, survival and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with breast cancer (n=123) were randomized to receive doxorubicin and DOC either in combination (60 mg/m2 of each drug), or by alternated or sequential schedule (100 mg/m2 DOC and 75 mg/m2 doxorubicin) every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles as first chemotherapy for stage IV disease. A second randomization allocated patients from each arm to receive prophylactic oral ciprofloxacin or no therapy to prevent febrile neutropenia. RESULTS: Patients received a median of eight cycles. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response was 63%, 52% and 61% in the combination, alternating and sequential schedules, respectively. Corresponding rates of complete response were 15%, 14% and 11%. Grade 4 neutropenia was common in all arms (81%) and, together with febrile neutropenia, was significantly more frequent with the combination. Prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin did not reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia or infection. Other frequent non-hematological adverse events included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis and asthenia. Congestive heart failure only occurred in the combination arm (10%). CONCLUSION: All three schedules are feasible and endowed of good therapeutic activity. In view of the more pronounced toxicity and the risk of cardiac events because of the higher exposure to doxorubicin, the combination should be least favored when treating women with metastatic breast cancer. Prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin was ineffective and is not recommended.     

Phase II study of gefitinib in combination with docetaxel as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer

We have evaluated the activity and safety of gefitinib, a small-molecule epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with docetaxel as first-line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In total, 41 patients with MBC were enrolled in a first-line combination therapy study with oral gefitinib (250 mg day(-1)) and intravenous docetaxel (75 mg m(-2), the first 14 patients; or 100 mg m(-2), the following 27 patients, on day 1 of a 3-week cycle). Out of 41 patients, 38 received at least one cycle of therapy. There were no differences in activity or tolerability between the two docetaxel doses. G3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (49%), diarrhoea (10%), acne-like rash (5%), and anaemia (2%). Complete plus partial responses (CR+PR) were observed in 22 out of 41 patients with a 54% response rate (95% confidence interval (CI) 45-75%). The 22 patients that achieved a response following six cycles of docetaxel plus gefitinib continued gefitinib monotherapy (median duration, 24 weeks; range, 2-108+ weeks). Two patients with PR following combination therapy achieved a CR during gefitinib monotherapy. Complete plus partial responses correlated with oestrogen receptor (ER) status, since they occurred in 19 out of 27 (70%) patients with ER-positive tumours as compared to three out of 14 (21%) patients with ER-negative tumours (P=0.01).     

Biweekly docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer

This study was designed to evaluate the antitumor activity and tolerance of biweekly docetaxel plus vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Forty-one patients with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy for MBC were treated with docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) plus vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 2 weeks for a maximum of 12 courses. Median age was 58 years (range, 23-75). Fourteen patients (34.1%) were premenopausal and 27 (65.9%) were postmenopausal. Most patients had received prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 27, 65.9%), radiation therapy (n = 22, 53.6%), and hormone therapy (n = 21, 51.2%). The most frequent sites of metastasis were bone (n = 18, 43.9%), pleuropulmonary (n = 16, 39%), and liver (n = 14, 34.1%). Twenty-seven patients (65.9%) had more than one site of metastasis. Three hundred and thirty-nine courses were given (median, 8 courses per patient; range, 1-12). Median relative dose intensity was 85% for both docetaxel and vinorelbine. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (14 patients, 34.1%), febrile neutropenia (n = 14, 34.1%), and stomatitis (n = 4, 9.8%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. All patients were assessed for response in an intent-to-treat analysis. Four patients (9.8%) had a complete response and 19 (46.3%) had a partial response (overall response rate, 56.1%; 95% CI, 42%-70%). Six patients (14.6%) had stable disease and 12 patients (29.3%) had progressive disease. With a median follow-up of 15.1 months or until death, median duration of response is 12.6 months. Median time to progression is 12.4 months. Median survival time is 19.6 months. This biweekly combination of docetaxel plus vinorelbine is feasible and active as first-line chemotherapy in patients with MBC. This regimen is safe and well tolerated.     

Sequential doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer: a GEICAM-9801 phase II study

Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy and the toxicity profile of the sequential administration of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and methods. Eighty-one patients received a total of 436 cycles of chemotherapy: 236 of doxorubicin (75 mg/m²) and 200 of docetaxel (100 mg/m² every 21 days). The first 35 patients received doxorubicin every 14 days with G-CSF support, and in the other 46 cases doxorubicin was administered every 21 days without G-CSF. Results. After entire treatment the overall response rate was 65% (18 complete responses). With a median follow-up of 19 months (range, 1–48 months), the median time to progression was 11.3 months and the median survival time was 31 months. As expected, febrile neutropenia was the most important toxicity and it appeared in 26 cycles (6%) and 19 patients (23%). In the patients that received doxorubicin every 14 days, the febrile neutropenia incidence was higher during docetaxel treatment, especially after its first administration. Conclusions. The dose and schedule of doxorubicin and docetaxel used in this trial seems to be active in first-line treatment of patients with MBC. The toxicity profile appears to be better than observed with concomitant schedules.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine, doxorubicin and paclitaxel (GAT) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a translational research experience

Background  

Patients with metastatic breast cancer are frequently treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, which are among the most active agents in this disease. Gemcitabine is an interesting candidate for a three-drug combination because of its different mechanism of action and non-overlapping toxicity with respect to the other two drugs. We aimed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of the GAT (gemcitabine, doxorubicin and paclitaxel) regimen, derived from experimental preclinical studies, as first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIB-IV breast cancer.     

Phase II study of vinorelbine (alternating intravenous and oral) in combination with docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer

Purpose  Combination of intravenous (i.v.) vinorelbine and docetaxel was shown to be feasible and effective in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In an effort to improve patient convenience, we investigated in first-line treatment a regimen alternating i.v. and oral vinorelbine in combination with docetaxel. Patients and methods  Forty-nine patients (median age, 53 years) with MBC received a maximum of 6 cycles consisting of i.v. vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 plus docetaxel 60 mg/m2 given on day 1, and oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2 on day 15 every 3 weeks in an open-label, multicentre phase II study (recommended dose established in phase I study [1]). Results  Sixty-three percent of the patient had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and 78% presented visceral involvement. Twenty-four responses were documented and validated by an independent panel review, yielding response rates of 49% (95% CI: 34–64) in the 49 enrolled patients and 55.8% (95% CI: 40–71) in the 43 evaluable patients. Median duration of response was 9.4 months. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 5.5 and 33.2 months, respectively. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity but complications were uncommon, four patients having experienced febrile neutropenia and one having developed neutropenic infection. Other frequently reported adverse events included alopecia, fatigue, stomatitis, constipation, diarrhoea and nausea, which were rarely severe. Conclusions  This regimen alternating oral and i.v. vinorelbine in combination with docetaxel is effective and manageable. Vinorelbine i.v. per oral day 1 per day 15-docetaxel day 1 every 3 weeks represents a convenient option to combine docetaxel and vinorelbine for the palliative treatment of MBC.     

Use of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

We evaluated the feasibility and incidence of hematological toxicity in a series of 39 breast cancer patients treated at our institute with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by docetaxel, using prophylactic G-CSF (pegfilgrastim). We prescribed G-CSF as secondary prophylaxis during the AC regimen and as primary prophylaxis during treatment with docetaxel. For the AC treatment, we recorded 6 cases of grade III (15.3%) and one case of grade IV (2.5%) neutropenia; we found one case of Grade IV anemia. For the docetaxel regimen, we registered one case of Grade IV (2.5%) neutropenia and three cases of Grade III leukopoenia without neutropenia. No patients experienced cardiac symptoms or baseline LVEF rate decrease. All patients concluded the programmed chemotherapy. Our experience shows the safety of docetaxel in combination with anthracyclines and the efficacy of prophylaxis with G-CSF in breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Docetaxel and doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial.

PURPOSE: This randomized, multicenter, phase III study compared doxorubicin and docetaxel (AT) with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) as first-line chemotherapy (CT) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 429) were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (n = 214) or doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) (n = 215) on day 1, every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. RESULTS: Time to progression (TTP; primary end point) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were significantly longer with AT than AC (median TTP, 37.3 v 31.9 weeks; log-rank P =.014; median TTF, 25.6 v 23.7 weeks; log-rank P =.048). The overall response rate (ORR) was significantly greater for patients taking AT (59%, with 10% complete response [CR], 49% partial response [PR]) than for those taking AC (47%, with 7% CR, 39% PR) (P =.009). The ORR was also higher with AT in patients with visceral involvement (58% v 41%; liver, 62% v 42%; lung, 58% v 35%), three or more organs involved (59% v 40%), or prior adjuvant CT (53% v 41%). Overall survival (OS) was comparable in both arms. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was frequent in both groups, although febrile neutropenia and infections were more frequent for patients taking AT (respectively, 33% v 10%, P <.001; 8% v 2%, P =.01). Severe nonhematologic toxicity was infrequent in both groups, including grade 3/4 cardiac events (AT, 3%; AC, 4%). CONCLUSION: AT significantly improves TTP and ORR compared with AC in patients with MBC, but there is no difference in OS. AT represents a valid option for the treatment of MBC.