Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of flavopiridol in children with refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities, maximum-tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol (NSC 649890) when administered as a 1-hour infusion over 3 consecutive days to children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Flavopiridol was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion daily for 3 consecutive days every 21 days, or when hematologic toxicity or any grade 2 or greater nonhematologic toxicity resolved. The starting dose was 37.5 mg/m2/d. Dose escalation was in cohorts of three patients in a standard fashion until dose-limiting toxicity and the maximum-tolerated dose were determined. Flavopiridol levels were measured on days 1, 2, and 3. RESULTS: Twenty-five children received flavopiridol at doses of 37.5 to 80 mg/m2/day over 3 consecutive days. The maximum-tolerated dose was 62.5 mg/m2/d. The primary dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhea. No antitumor effect was observed in this population. Mean peak plasma concentrations of 3.71 and 9.11 micromol/L were achieved at the end of the 1-hour infusion, following dose escalation from 37.5 mg/m2 to 80 mg/m2, respectively. The median flavopiridol plasma clearance was 8.0 L/h/m2 (range, 2.6 to 17.1 L/h/m2). CONCLUSION: The maximum-tolerated dose of flavopiridol in children, and the recommended phase II dose for pediatric studies, was 62.5 mg/m2/day when administered as a 1-hour infusion for 3 consecutive days. Dose-limiting toxicities of neutropenia and diarrhea were similar to those in adult studies.     

Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of oral gefitinib and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors

Purpose

This phase I study endeavored to estimate the maximum tolerated dose and describe the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of oral irinotecan with gefitinib in children with refractory solid tumors.

Methods

Oral irinotecan was administered on days 1–5 and 8–12 with oral gefitinib (fixed dose, 150 mg/m²/day) on days 1–12 of a 21-day course. The escalation with overdose control method guided irinotecan dose escalation (7 dose levels, range 5–40 mg/m²/day).

Results

Sixteen of 19 patients were evaluable, with serial pharmacokinetic studies in ten patients. Diagnoses included osteosarcoma (N = 5), neuroblastoma (N = 3), sarcoma (N = 3), and others (N = 5). Patients received a median of two courses (range 1–20), with at least two patients treated on dose levels 2–7. Three patients had five DLTs; the most common being metabolic (hypokalemia, N = 2 and hypophosphatemia, N = 1) at dose levels two (10 mg/m²) and four (20 mg/m²). One patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea (40 mg/m²). Irinotecan bioavailability was 2.5-fold higher when co-administered with gefitinib, while the conversion rate of irinotecan to SN-38 lactone was unaffected. The study closed due to poor accrual before evaluation of the next recommended irinotecan dose level (35 mg/m²). Of 11 patients receiving at least two courses of therapy, three had stable disease lasting two to four courses and one patient maintained a complete response through 18 courses.

Conclusions

The combination of oral gefitinib and irinotecan has acceptable toxicity and anti-tumor activity in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. Pharmacokinetic analysis confirms that co-administration of gefitinib increases irinotecan bioavailability leading to an increased SN-38 lactone systemic exposure.     

A Phase I trial of bryostatin-1 in children with refractory solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group study.

Bryostatin-1, a macrocyclic lactone, appears to elicit a wide range of biological responses including modulation of protein kinase C (PKC). PKC, one of the major elements in the signal transduction pathway, is involved in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, gene expression, and tumor promotion. Because of the potential for a unique mechanism of interaction with tumorgenesis, a Phase I trial of bryostatin-1 was performed in children with solid tumors to: (a) establish the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD); (b) establish the pharmacokinetic profile in children; and (c) document any evidence of antitumor activity. A 1-h infusion of bryostatin-1 in a PET formulation (60% polyethylene glycol 400, 30% ethanol, and 10% Tween 80) was administered weekly for 3 weeks to 22 children (age range, 2-21 years) with malignant solid tumors refractory to conventional therapy. Doses ranged from 20 to 57 microg/m2/ dose. Pharmacokinetics were performed in at least three patients per dose level. The first course was used to determine the DLT and MTD. Twenty-two patients on five dose levels were evaluable for toxicities. At the 57 microg/m2/dose level dose-limiting myalgia (grade 3) was observed in three patients; two of those patients also experienced photophobia or eye pain, and one experienced headache. Symptoms occurred in all patients within 24-72 h after the second dose of bryostatin-1 with resolution within 1 week of onset. Other observed toxicities (grades 1 and 2) included elevation in liver transaminases, thrombocytopenia, fever, and flu-like symptoms. The bryostatin-1 infusion was typically well tolerated. Although stable disease was noted in several patients, no complete or partial responses were observed. The recommended Phase II dose of bryostatin-1 administered as a 1-h infusion weekly for 3 of every 4 weeks to children with solid tumors is 44 microg/m2/dose. Myalgia, photophobia, or eye pain, as well as headache, were found to be dose limiting.     

Phase I study of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group study (ADVL0015).

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacodynamics of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (formerly PS-341) in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An intravenous bolus of bortezomib was administered twice weekly for 2 consecutive weeks at either 1.2 or 1.6 mg/m2/dose followed by a 1-week rest. The pharmacodynamics of bortezomib were evaluated by measurement of whole blood 20S proteasome activity. RESULTS: Fifteen patients, 11 assessable, were enrolled between November 2001 and February 2003. Dose-limiting thrombocytopenia, which prevented administration of a complete course (four doses in 2 weeks) of therapy, occurred in two of five assessable children enrolled at the 1.6 mg/m2 dose level. There were no other DLTs. Inhibition of 20S proteasome activity seemed to be dose dependent. The average inhibition 1 hour after drug administration on day 1 was 67.2% +/- 7.6% at the 1.2 mg/m2/dose and 76.5% +/- 3.3% at the 1.6 mg/m2/dose. There were no objective antitumor responses. CONCLUSION: Bortezomib is well tolerated in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors. The recommended phase II dose of bortezomib for children with solid tumors is 1.2 mg/m2/dose, administered as an intravenous bolus twice weekly for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week break.     

Phase I trial of indicine-N-oxide in children with leukemia and solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group study

Summary Binary combinations of cisplatin and the 5-HT₃ antagonist, BRL 43694, have been used to treat both conventional mice bearing either L1210 leukaemia or ADJ/PC6 plasmacytoma and nude mice xenografted with a human ovarian carcinoma (HX/110). In no case was there evidence for antagonism by the antiemetic of the antitumour properties of cisplatin.     

A phase I study of 17-allylaminogeldanamycin in relapsed/refractory pediatric patients with solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To determine the recommended phase 2 dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetic profile, and pharmacodynamics of the heat shock protein (Hsp) 90 inhibitor, 17-allylaminogeldanamycin (17-AAG). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 17-AAG was administered as a 60-min infusion, on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle at dose levels of 150, 200, 270, and 360 mg/m(2)/dose. Pharmacokinetic studies and evaluations for Hsp72 and Akt levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were done during the first course of therapy. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (7 males), median 7 years of age (range, 1-19 years), were enrolled using a standard dose escalation scheme. No DLTs were observed. Although there were no objective responses, three patients remain on therapy at 6+, 7+, and 9+ months with stable disease. One patient with hepatoblastoma had a reduction in alpha-fetoprotein and stable disease over three cycles. At 270 mg/m(2)/dose, the C(max) and areas under the plasma concentration-time curves of 17-AAG were 5,303 +/- 1,591 ng/mL and 13,656 +/- 4,757 ng/mL h, respectively, similar to the exposure in adults. The mean terminal half-life for 17-AAG was 3.24 +/- 0.80 h. Induction of Hsp72, a surrogate marker for inhibition of Hsp90, was detected at the 270 mg/m(2) dose level. CONCLUSIONS: Drug exposures consistent with those required for anticancer activity in preclinical models were achieved without DLT. Evidence for drug-induced modulation of Hsp90 systemically was also detected. The recommended phase II dose of 17-AAG is 360 mg/m(2)/d. Non-DMSO-containing formulations may improve acceptance of this drug by children and their families.     

Cyclophosphamide plus topotecan in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group phase II study.

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate of the combination of cyclophosphamide and topotecan in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory malignant solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 91 pediatric patients, 83 of whom were fully assessable for response and toxicity, received cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2/dose) followed by topotecan (0.75 mg/m2/dose), each given as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days. All patients received filgrastim (5 mcg/kg) daily until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was > or = 1,500 microL after the time of the expected ANC nadir. RESULTS: A total of 307 treatment courses were given to the 83 fully assessable patients. Responses (complete response plus partial response) were seen in rhabdomyosarcoma (10 of 15 patients), Ewing's sarcoma (six of 17 patients), and neuroblastoma (six of 13 patients). Partial responses were seen in two of 18 patients with osteosarcoma and in one patient with a Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor. Twenty-three patients had either minor responses (n = 6) or stable disease (n = 17); the median number of courses administered to patients with partial or complete response was six (range, two to 13 courses), and the median administered to those with stable disease was three (range, one to 11 courses). The toxicity of the combination was limited principally to the hematopoietic system. Of 307 courses, 163 (53%) were associated with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 84 (27%) with grade 3 or 4 anemia, and 136 (44%) with grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. Despite the severe myelosuppression, only 34 (11%) of 307 courses were associated with grade 3 or 4 infection. Nonhematopoietic toxicity of grades > or = 3 was rare and consisted of nausea and vomiting (two courses), perirectal mucositis (one course), transaminase elevation (one course), and hematuria (two courses). CONCLUSION: The combination of cyclophosphamide and topotecan is active in rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma, and Ewing's sarcoma. Stabilization of disease was seen in osteosarcoma, although objective responses were rare in this disease. The therapy can be given with acceptable hematopoietic toxicity with the use of filgrastim support.     

Phase I trial of docetaxel with filgrastim support in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors: a collaborative Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute and Children's Cancer Group trial.

Neutropenia is the dose-limiting toxicity of docetaxel in children. This Phase I trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities, and the incidence and severity of other toxicities of docetaxel with filgrastim (G-CSF) support in children with refractory solid tumors. Docetaxel was administered as an i.v. infusion for 1 h every 21 days with a starting dose of 150 mg/m2 and an escalation to 185 mg/m2 and 235 mg/m2 in subsequent patient cohorts. G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day) was administered s.c., starting 48 h after docetaxel and continuing until the post-nadir neutrophil count reached 10,000/microl. Seventeen patients received 27 courses of docetaxel with G-CSF support. Generalized erythematous desquamating skin rash and myalgias were dose-limiting at 235 mg/m2. Localized and generalized rashes were seen at all of the three dose levels. Neutropenia (median nadir, 95/1microl) occurred at all of the dose levels but was brief in duration and not dose-limiting. Thrombocytopenia was minimal (median platelet count nadir, 139,000/microl), and the severity of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia did not seem to be related to the docetaxel dose. Other docetaxel-related toxicities included hemorrhage (associated with mucositis), sepsis, hypersensitivity reaction, transient elevation of liver enzymes, stomatitis, back pain, asthenia, and neuropathy. One minor response was observed in a patient with colon cancer. The maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel with G-CSF support in children is 185 mg/m2, which is 50% higher than the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel alone in children and 85 % higher than the recommended adult dose.     

Phase I trial of tirapazamine and cyclophosphamide in children with refractory solid tumors: a pediatric oncology group study.

PURPOSE: To determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetic profile of tirapazamine (Sanofi Synthelabo Research, Malvern, PA) combined with cyclophosphamide in children with recurrent solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received a 2-hour infusion of tirapazamine, followed by 1,500 mg/m(2) cyclophosphamide, and mesna once every 3 weeks. Dose escalation of tirapazamine began at 250 mg/m(2) and was increased by 30% in subsequent cohorts. If DLT was hematologic, less-heavily pretreated patients were to be enrolled until their DLTs were encountered, and MTDs defined. Pharmacokinetic profiles were also characterized. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled onto the study. Pharmacokinetic data were calculated for 22 patients. Prolonged neutropenia was the DLT at 420 mg/m(2) in heavily pretreated patients. Grade 3, reversible ototoxicity was the DLT in less-heavily pretreated patients at 420 mg/m(2). Two (one with neuroblastoma and one with rhabdomyosarcoma) had partial responses. One child with neuroblastoma had prolonged stable disease (10 cycles) at a dose of 250 mg/m(2). This patient had disease detectable in the bone marrow only and all evidence of bone marrow involvement resolved for 17 cycles of therapy. Four other patients had stable disease. An apparent dose-proportional increase in tirapazamine maximal concentration and area under the curve(last) was observed. Tirapazamine clearance, volume of distribution at steady-state, and terminal half-life did not appear to be dose-dependent. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of tirapazamine given with 1,500 mg/m(2) of cyclophosphamide once every 3 weeks is 325 mg/m(2). Neutropenia and ototoxicity were dose-limiting. Based on early evidence of antitumor activity, additional studies appear warranted.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) and gemcitabine in patients with refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Preclinical data shows improvements in response for the combination of imatinib mesylate (IM, Gleevec) and gemcitabine (GEM) therapy compared with GEM alone. Our goals were to determine the maximum tolerated dose of GEM and IM in combination, the pharmacokinetics of GEM in the absence and in the presence of IM, and IM pharmacokinetics in this combination. Patients and Methods: Patients with refractory malignancy, intact intestinal absorption, measurable/evaluable disease, adequate organ function, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS 0-2, and signed informed consent were eligible. Initially, treatment consisted of 600 mg/m2 of GEM (10 mg/m2/min) on days 1, 8, and 15, and 300 mg of IM daily every 28 days. Due to excessive toxicity, the schedule was altered to IM on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12, and GEM on days 3 and 10 every 21 days. Two final cohorts received IM on days 1 to 5, 8 to 12, and 15 to 19. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were treated. IM and GEM given daily at 500 to 600 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 produced frequent dose-limiting toxicities. With the modified scheduling, GEM given at 1,500 mg/m2/150 min was deliverable, along with 400 mg of IM, without dose-limiting toxicities. Three partial (laryngeal, renal, and mesothelioma) and two minor (renal and pancreatic) responses were noted at GEM doses of 450 to 1,500 mg/m2. Stable disease >24 weeks was seen in 17 patients. CA19-9 in 7 of 10 patients with pancreatic cancer was reduced by approximately 90%. IM did not significantly alter GEM pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSION: The addition of intermittently dosed IM to GEM at low to full dose was associated with broad antitumor activity and little increase in toxicity.     

Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of lapatinib in combination with sorafenib in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors

BackgroundThe epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and ERBB2 (HER2) pathways and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-dependent angiogenesis have a pivotal role in cancer pathogenesis and progression. Robust experimental evidence has shown that these pathways are functionally linked and implicated in acquired resistance to targeted therapies making them attractive candidates for joined targeting. We undertook this phase I trial to assess the safety, the recommended dose for phase II trials (RPTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and the preliminary antitumour activity of the combination of lapatinib and sorafenib in patients with advanced refractory solid tumours.MethodsFour cohorts of at least three patients each received lapatinib once daily and sorafenib twice daily together on a continuous schedule. Doses of lapatinib and sorafenib were escalated based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first treatment cycle following a traditional 3 + 3 design until the RPTD was reached. Additional patients were treated at the RPTD to characterise PK profiles of this combination and to investigate the potential interaction between lapatinib and sorafenib. Serum samples were collected at baseline and then prospectively every two cycles to assess changes in PD parameters. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00984425.FindingsThirty patients with advanced refractory solid tumours were enroled. DLTs were grade three fatigue and grade 3 atypical skin rash observed at dose levels 3 and 4, respectively. The higher dose level explored (lapatinib 1250 mg/day and sorafenib 400 mg twice daily) represented the RPTD of the combination. The most common drug-related adverse events were fatigue (68%), hypocalcemia (61%), diarrhoea (57%), lymphopaenia (54%), anorexia (50%), rash (50%), and hypophosphatemia (46%). PK analysis revealed no significant effect of sorafenib on the PK profile of lapatinib. Of the 27 assessable patients for clinical activity, one achieved a confirmed complete response, four (15%) had a partial response, and 12 (44%) achieved disease stabilisation. The disease control rate overall was 63%.InterpretationCombination treatment with lapatinib and sorafenib was feasible with promising clinical activity and without significant PK interactions. Long term tolerability seems to be challenging.     

Phase I study of the combination of topotecan and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors

Purpose: We have shown in xenograft studies that the antitumor activities of topotecan and irinotecan are highly schedule- and dose-dependent, with a high frequency of response at low, protracted dose schedules. Preclinical and clinical data suggest that topotecan and irinotecan have different antitumor activities and mechanisms of resistance, and non-overlapping toxicities, providing a rationale for their combination. Combining both agents may increase the amount of camptothecin delivered to the tumor, without additive toxicity. Methods: We conducted a phase I study in children with refractory solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan when administered with a targeted systemic exposure (TSE) of topotecan and to define the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of this combination. Irinotecan was administered IV over 60 min followed by topotecan over 30 min daily for 5 days for two consecutive weeks. We initially fixed the topotecan-TSE to 80±10 ng*h/ml and investigated the ability to escalate irinotecan (starting dose 16 mg/m²/d). Topotecan and irinotecan pharmacokinetics were determined. Results: Eleven patients (median age 10 years) were enrolled. Owing to DLT, irinotecan was de-escalated to 12 (level −1; n=3) and 9 (level −2; n=3) mg/m²/day, and topotecan-TSE was reduced to 60±10 ng*h/ml (level −3; n=2). DLTs were neutropenia (n=8), typhlitis (n=5), and skin rash (n=1). MTD could not be reached. Median (range) irinotecan and topotecan lactone systemic clearances were 50.3 (16.6–76.2) l/h/m² and 27.6 (14.7–55.9) l/h/m², respectively. The pharmacokinetics profile of each agent was similar to that seen in previous single agent studies. One patient with neuroblastoma and one with rhabdomyosarcoma had a partial and a complete response, respectively. Conclusion: Despite promising antitumor activity, the combination of topotecan and irinotecan given on a protracted schedule does not warrant further development in children due to unacceptable toxicity. Contract grant sponsor: National Institutes of Health; Contract grant numbers P30 CA 21765 and CA 23099; Contract grant sponsor: American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC).     

Phase I dosage finding and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous topotecan and oral erlotinib in adults with refractory solid tumors

Purpose

Topotecan is widely used for refractory solid tumors but multi-drug resistance may occur due to tumor expression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. Since erlotinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor, also inhibits several ABC transporters, we performed a phase I study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous topotecan given in combination with erlotinib.

Methods

Patients received 150 mg of oral erlotinib daily and a 30 min intravenous infusion of topotecan on days 1–5 of a 21-day cycle. Dosage escalation of topotecan occurred with a starting dosage of 0.75 mg/m². The pharmacokinetics of topotecan was evaluated on day 1 of cycle 1 without erlotinib and on day 1 of cycle 2 or 3 with erlotinib.

Results

Twenty-nine patients were enrolled. The maximum tolerated dosage was determined to be 1.0 mg/m². Dose-limiting toxicities included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The average duration of treatment was 97 days. Two partial responses were observed. Topotecan clearance and exposure were similar with and without erlotinib.

Conclusions

The combination of topotecan and erlotinib is tolerable at clinically effective doses. Erlotinib does not affect the disposition of topotecan to a clinically significant extent.     

Phase I study of topotecan administered as a 21-day continous infusion in children with recurrent solid tumors: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

The purpose of this study was to determine the toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics of a 21-day continuous infusion of topotecan in children with relapsed solid tumors. Fifteen patients received 40 courses of continuous ambulatory infusions of topotecan every 28 days or when there was resolution of hematological toxicity and any grade 2 or greater nonhematological toxicity. The starting dose was 0.4 mg/m2/day. Total topotecan levels were measured on days 1, 7, 14, and 21. Three of four patients who received a starting dose of 0.4 mg/m2/day experienced dose-limiting myelosuppression. At the reduced dose of 0.3 mg/ m2/day, only two of the seven patients experienced dose-limiting myelosuppression. Subsequently, four patients with more limited prior therapy were treated with 0.4 mg/m2/ day; three had dose-limiting myelosuppression. Two patients with a dose-limiting toxicity at 0.4 mg/m2/day tolerated additional courses at 0.3 mg/m2/day. An equal number of patients had grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Other adverse events were rare. Two patients with ependymoma, one with rhabdomyosarcoma, and one with retinoblastoma metastatic to the brain had objective responses. The steady state plasma concentration and clearance of topotecan (Css) was achieved by day 1. Css in six patients with complete data were 1.44 +/- 0.50 and 2.13 +/- 0.83 ng/ml at 0.3 and 0.4 mg/m2/day, respectively. Thus, a 21-day topotecan infusion was well-tolerated at 0.3 mg/m2/day. Myelo-suppression was the dose-limiting toxicity at 0.4 mg/m2/day. The steady state and clearance of topotecan in this study are similar to those reported in adult patients.     

Phase II investigation of docetaxel in pediatric patients with recurrent solid tumors: a report from the Children's Oncology Group

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel, which is an antitubulin agent, has demonstrable activity against murine and human tumors. The current study was designed to determine response rates to docetaxel in various strata of recurrent solid tumors of childhood and to assess toxicity in a group of patients who were assigned to receive it. METHODS: Docetaxel was given at a dose of 125 mg/m2 once every 21 days as a 1-hour intravenous infusion for a maximum of 12 courses. From January 1997 to November 2001, 109 male patients and 68 female patients (total, 177 patients) were enrolled, and 173 patients were eligible. The median patient age at entry was 13 years (range, 1-27 yrs). One hundred sixty patients were evaluable for response. RESULTS: There were no deaths attributable to study drug. Hematologic toxicity was common during therapy. Dermatologic, neurologic, pulmonary, and infectious side effects as well as edema were significant. One patient each had acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoid leukemia, and high-grade glioma reported as secondary malignancies. One patient with osteosarcoma and 1 patient with rhabdomyosarcoma achieved a complete response. Partial responses were observed in patients with Ewing sarcoma (3 patients), osteosarcoma (1 patient), squamous cell carcinoma (1 patient), and medulloblastoma (1 patient). Seventeen patients had stable disease. The 1-year and 5-year overall survival rates for the 160 evaluable patients were 24% (standard error = 4%) and 6% (standard error = 2%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel demonstrated activity in patients with recurrent Ewing sarcoma but was found to be ineffective for treating the other types of recurrent solid tumors that were studied.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and the dose at which at least 50% of the patients experienced a DLT during the first cycle, and to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with only one prior chemotherapy treatment (without taxanes or topoisomerase I inhibitors) for advanced disease were included in the study. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion after premedication with corticosteroids followed immediately by irinotecan as a 90-minute IV infusion, every 3 weeks. No hematologic growth factors were allowed. RESULTS: Forty patients were entered through the following seven dose levels (docetaxel/irinotecan): 40/140 mg/m(2), 50/175 mg/m(2), 60/210 mg/m(2), 60/250 mg/m(2), 60/275 mg/m(2), 60/300 mg/m(2), and 70/250 mg/m(2). Two hundred cycles were administered. Two MTDs were determined, 70/250 mg/m(2) and 60/300 mg/m(2); the DLTs were febrile neutropenia and diarrhea. Neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity, with 85% of patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities in patients included late diarrhea (7.5%), asthenia (15.0%), febrile neutropenia (22.5%), infection (7.5%), and nausea (5.0%). Pharmacokinetics of both docetaxel and irinotecan were not modified with the administration schedule of this study. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan is 60/275 mg/m(2), respectively. At this dose level, the safety profile is manageable. The activity of this combination should be evaluated in phase II studies in different tumor types.     

Phase 2 study of temozolomide in children and adolescents with recurrent central nervous system tumors: a report from the Children's Oncology Group

BACKGROUND: Effective chemotherapy is lacking for most types of central nervous system (CNS) tumors in children. Temozolomide, an agent with activity against adult brain tumors, was investigated in children and adolescents with recurrent CNS tumors. METHODS: Temozolomide was administered orally as monthly 5-day courses at doses of 200 mg/m(2)/d (patients with no prior craniospinal irradiation [CSI]) or 180 mg/m(2)/d (prior CSI). Patients with a complete (CR) or partial (PR) response or stable disease (SD) could continue temozolomide for up to 12 cycles. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 122 patients, including 113 with CNS tumors. Median age was 11 years (range, 1-23 years). Among 104 evaluable patients with CNS tumors, 5 PRs and 1 CR were observed. PRs occurred in 1 of 23 evaluable patients with high-grade astrocytoma, 1 of 21 with low-grade astrocytoma, and 3 of 25 with medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET). The CR occurred in an additional patient with medulloblastoma/PNET. No responses were observed in patients with ependymoma, brain-stem glioma, or other CNS tumors. Notably, 41% of patients with low-grade astrocytoma had SD through 12 courses. The most frequent toxicities were grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (19%) and thrombocytopenia (25%); nonhematologic toxicity was infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Although overall objective responses were limited, further exploration of temozolomide may be warranted in children with medulloblastoma and other PNETs, or in patients with low-grade astrocytoma, perhaps in a setting of less pretreatment than the patients in the current study, or in the context of multiagent therapy.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 7-hydroxystaurosporine and carboplatin in advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Based on preclinical data showing synergy between 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) and platinum agents, a phase I trial of carboplatin with UCN-01 administered as a 3 h infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors was done. The primary goals of this trial were to evaluate the tolerability of this combination and the pharmacokinetics of UCN-01 when administered over 3 h and to compare the tolerability and pharmacokinetics with previously described schedules. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, good performance status, normal organ function, and no potentially curative therapy were eligible for the trial. Carboplatin was escalated from an area under the curve (AUC) of 3 to an AUC of 5. UCN-01 was escalated from 50 to 90 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with advanced solid tumors (20 with prior platinum treatment) received a total of 60 cycles of therapy. Full doses of both agents (carboplatin AUC 5, UCN-01 90 mg/m(2) in cycle 1, 45 mg/m(2) in subsequent cycles) could be administered. The major toxicity noted was hypotension, which could be abrogated with the use of saline prehydration and posthydration. No responses were seen; however, seven patients were able to receive more than two courses of therapy. Of note, two of three patients with refractory, progressive small cell lung cancer were able to receive six cycles of therapy without evidence of progression. One patient experienced resolution of paraneoplastic syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone. The pharmacokinetic variables C(max) and t(1/2) of the 3 h infusion were essentially identical to those previously observed when UCN-01 was administered over 72 h. The average t(1/2) for cycle 1 was 506 +/- 301 h, and the mean C(max) for all dose levels was >30 micromol/L. The mean AUC over the dosing interval for each dose level ranged from approximately 6,000 to 9,000 micromol/L h. Thus, the AUC of UCN-01 after the 3 h infusion was lower than was observed after a 72 h infusion. CONCLUSION: The regimen of carboplatin and UCN-01 (administered as a 3 h infusion) was well tolerated. Further development of this combination, particularly in small cell lung cancer, is warranted.