Extrapulmonary effects of maintenance corticosteroid therapy with alternate-day prednisone and inhaled beclomethasone in children with chronic asthma

Extrapulmonary effects of alternate-day prednisone and inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate therapy were examined in 24 and 32 children with asthma, respectively. Early morning serum cortisol values were significantly lower among patients receiving alternate-day prednisone than among patients receiving inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate and control subjects at 24 hours but not at 48 hours after an alternate-day prednisone dose. Urinary-free cortisol output during the second 24 hours of the alternate-day prednisone regimen were similar to values among patients receiving inhaled beclomethasone and were significantly lower than among control subjects for both groups. Mean heights among patients before being placed on maintenance corticosteroids were at the thirty-fifth percentile and were similar for both regimens. This was significantly lower than initial measurements for control subjects who, on average, were near the fiftieth percentile for both children with asthma not requiring maintenance corticosteroids and normal healthy Iowa children. Mean heights for both corticosteroid-treated groups remained at the thirty-fifth percentile after more than a 2-year average duration of follow-up. Heights of children with chronic asthma not requiring maintenance corticosteroids were initially significantly higher (fifty-first percentile) than the patients who subsequently required maintenance corticosteroids and increased significantly to the sixty-first percentile during a mean 2.7-year follow-up. Heights of healthy Iowa children remained near the fiftieth percentile during a mean 7-year follow-up. Disproportionate weight gain, although it was not consistently present, was significantly more likely with the alternate-day prednisone. Other extrapulmonary effects of the corticosteroid regimens appeared not to be of clinical importance during the time period of the study.     

Obtaining concomitant control of allergic rhinitis and asthma with a nasally inhaled corticosteroid

Allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma coexist frequently and a dual treatment is recommended by prescribing topical nasal plus oral inhaled corticosteroids. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a nasally inhaled corticosteroid aiming at concomitant control of AR and asthma. A controlled trial was conducted among 60 patients with AR and asthma, aged 6-18 years, who were randomized into two groups. During 8 weeks, the experimental group (30 patients) received exclusively fluticasone propionate hydrofluoroalkane (FP-HFA) inhaled through the nose (mouth closed) using a large volume spacer attached to a face mask. The comparison group (30 patients) received a nasal spray of isotonic saline plus oral inhalation of FP-HFA through a mouthpiece attached to the same spacer. Clinical scores for AR and asthma, nasal inspiratory peak flow (NIPF), and spirometry were assessed by blinded observers. There was a significant improvement in AR scores and NIPF in the experimental group (P or= 0.20). Prebronchodilator FEV(1) (% predicted value) improved by 10% in both groups, comparing values at inclusion with those obtained at the end of follow up. Our results suggest that nasally inhaled FP-HFA through a spacer may control AR and asthma in children and adolescents. This approach is likely to result in higher compliance, lower costs, and fewer side effects.     

Effects of short- and long-acting beta-agonists on asthma exacerbations: a prospective cohort

BackgroundIn asthma, short- and long-acting β-agonists (SABAs and LABAs) should be used together with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and regular use is inappropriate.ObjectiveTo assess the relationship between patterns of use of therapy and asthma exacerbations (AEx).MethodsPatients with asthma (6-40 years) were enrolled in France and the United Kingdom. Prescribing data, computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs), and text messages assessed medication use and AEx over a maximum period of 24 months. Generalized linear mixed models provided AEx risks associated with therapy.ResultsAmong the 908 patients (median age: 20.0 years, 46.6% women, 24.5% children) answering a total of 4248 CATIs over 486 (±235) days, regular (ie, daily) use was more frequent for single LABAs and fixed dose combinations (FDCs) than for single ICS (75.6%, 70.1%, and 65.4% of investigated periods of use, respectively). Regular (ie, daily or almost daily) SABA use was observed for 21.1% of periods of use. Altogether, 265 patients (29.2%) experienced 1 or more AEx. The ORs for AEx risk related to regular vs no use of FDCs, single ICS, and single LABAs were 0.98 (95% CI = [0.73-1.33]), 0.90 (95% CI = [0.61-1.33]), and 1.29 (95% CI = [0.76-2.17]), respectively, after adjustment for cotherapy, sociodemographic, and disease characteristics. The OR was 2.09 (95% CI = [1.36-3.21]) in regular SABA users.ConclusionInhaled corticosteroids and FDCs were often used intermittently, whereas SABAs and LABAs could be used regularly, and exacerbations were frequent. Compared with non-users, the risk of exacerbation increased moderately under regular use of single LABAs, whereas it doubled, significantly, in regular SABA users, likely in relationship with poor overall asthma control.     

Differential anti-inflammatory effects of large and small particle size inhaled corticosteroids in asthma

BACKGROUND: Extra-fine particle formulations of hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclometasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) exhibit clinical effects comparable with conventional particle formulations of chlorofluorocarbon beclometasone dipropionate (CFC-BDP) at half the dose. There is little data comparing their effects on inflammation. We have evaluated the effects of HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP on pulmonary and systemic markers of asthmatic inflammation. METHODS: A double-blind randomized crossover trial was undertaken comparing the anti-inflammatory effects of HFA-BDP (100 and 400 microg/day) and CFC-BDP (200 and 800 microg/day). Treatment with montelukast was evaluated as add-on to the higher dose of BDP. RESULTS: Compared with baseline after withdrawal of usual asthma therapy, 100 microg of HFA-BDP significantly attenuated serum eosinophilic cationic protein levels (0.61-fold change, 95% CI 0.49-0.77; a 39% reduction, P < 0.001), but 200 microg of CFC-BDP did not (0.87-fold change, 95% CI 0.63-1.23; P = 1). A dose of 800 microg of CFC-BDP and 400 microg of HFA-BDP led to reductions in exhaled nitric oxide (0.57-fold change, 95% CI 0.44-0.73; a 43% reduction, P < 0.001 and 0.65-fold change, 95% CI 0.47-0.91; a 35% reduction, P = 0.008, respectively); and peripheral eosinophils (-74 cells/microl, 95% CI -146 to -2; P = 0.020 and -77 cells/microl, 95% CI -140 to -14; P = 0.012, respectively). Montelukast further reduced exhaled nitric oxide (0.81-fold change, 95% CI 0.66-0.98; P = 0.028) with 400 microg HFA-BDP and eosinophils (-44 cells/microl, 95% CI -80 to -8; P = 0.012) with 800 microg CFC-BDP, but not vice versa. CONCLUSION: Chlorofluorocarbon beclometasone dipropionate and HFA-BDP have differential effects on pulmonary and systemic inflammation, which dictate the additive effects of montelukast.     

Extrapulmonary effects of maintenance therapy with theophylline and inhaled albuterol in patients with chronic asthma

The extrapulmonary effects of slow-release theophylline and an inhaled beta 2-agonist (albuterol) were examined separately and in combination among 18 adults and adolescents with asthma during a 3-month randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Although neither global impressions nor daily diaries revealed differences in adverse effects, a structured questionnaire completed at the end of each regimen suggested a small but statistically significant increase in nausea and depressive and caffeine-like symptoms during the theophylline-containing regimens. Theophylline was also associated with improved verbal learning but decreased motor steadiness. Metabolic effects associated with theophylline included lower serum bicarbonate, greater urinary calcium excretion, and higher serum calcium, uric acid, and creatinine. Albuterol was associated with lower neutrophil counts and lower serum theophylline concentrations. There were no drug-induced effects on cardiac rhythm.     

Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination provides more effective asthma control than low-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus montelukast

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a disease of chronic inflammation and bronchoconstriction. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) provide important anti-inflammatory treatment but may not provide optimal control of asthma when taken alone. Two therapeutic alternatives for enhanced asthma control are to substitute the combination of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol (FP/Salm Combo) through the Diskus inhaler or to add montelukast to existing ICS therapy. OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy and safety of FP/Salm Combo through the Diskus inhaler versus montelukast added to FP (FP + montelukast) in patients whose symptoms were suboptimally controlled with ICS therapy. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, 12-week study in 447 patients with asthma who were symptomatic at baseline while receiving low-dose FP. Patients were treated for 12 weeks with one of the following: (1) combination of FP 100 microg plus salmeterol 50 microg twice daily through the Diskus inhaler, or (2) FP 100 microg twice daily through the Diskus inhaler plus oral montelukast 10 mg once daily. RESULTS: FP/Salm Combo treatment provided better overall asthma control than FP + montelukast with significantly greater improvements in morning peak expiratory flow (+24.9 L/min vs +13.0 L/min, P <.001), evening peak expiratory flow (+18.9 L/min vs +9.6 L/min, P <.001), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (+0.34 L vs +0.20 L, P <.001), as well as a change in the percentage of days with no albuterol use (+26.3% vs +19.1%, P =.032) and the shortness of breath symptom score (-0.56 vs -0.40, P =.017). The groups had comparable improvements in chest tightness, wheeze, and overall symptom scores. Asthma exacerbation rates were significantly lower (P =.031) in the FP/Salm Combo group (4 patients, 2%) than in the FP + montelukast group (13 patients, 6%). Adverse event profiles were comparable. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic patients on low-dose ICS therapy had significantly greater improvement in asthma control when switched to the FP/Salm Combo than when montelukast was added to ICS therapy.     

Safety of inhaled corticosteroid therapy in young children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Physicians have had some reluctance to use inhaled corticosteroids in very young children with asthma because of the possible risks of adverse systemic effects. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of fluticasone propionate on growth and adrenocortical function in young children with asthma. METHODS: We performed an open, prospective study for 24 weeks of 20 children with asthma, 2.5 to 5.0 years of age, who had received fluticasone by a large volume spacer at dosages ranging from 190.50 to 565.40 microg/m2 daily. Growth was evaluated by height standard deviation scores measured by a stadiometer. Adrenocortical function was evaluated twice in each child, before and after the study, by determining fasting serum cortisol concentrations at 8 AM and also at 30 and 60 minutes after adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation. Posttreatment values of height standard deviation scores and fasting morning serum cortisol concentrations were compared with those of 18 age-matched children, who constituted the control group. RESULTS: The evaluation of mean +/- SEM (and range) of height standard deviation scores revealed a significant decrease from 0.44 +/- 0.27 (-1.46 to 2.22) to 0.28 +/- 0.26 (-1.51 to 2.07; P = 0.01) at week 18 and to 0.25 +/- 0.24 (-1.90 to 2.13; P = 0.04) at the week 24 in fluticasone-treated children. At the end of the treatment, however, height standard deviation scores of these children did not differ significantly (P = 0.35) from those of the control group. Delayed growth with medium-duration treatment was not associated with alterations in serum cortisol measurements, either at baseline or after stimulation. The mean fasting morning serum cortisol concentrations did not differ significantly between the fluticasone-treated patients and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Some concern prevails about the safety of medium- or long-term treatment with regularly inhaled corticosteroids in young children with asthma. The prepubertal growth may be delayed, but the effect on ultimate height remains uncertain in such children. Growth should be regularly monitored in children who begin inhaled corticosteroid therapy for mild persistent asthma at an age <5 years old.     

Analysis of induced sputum to examine the effects of inhaled corticosteroid on airway inflammation in children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of induced sputum can be performed safely in children with asthma and is useful for both cellular and biochemical markers of inflammation. Glucocorticosteroid inhalation has become the first line therapy for chronic asthma by suppressing airway inflammation, which produces the decrease of bronchial hyperreactivity and reduces the number of eosinophil in bronchial submucosa. OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics of the inflammatory cells and their markers in sputum and to examine the pharmacokinetic effects of glucocorticoid within 3 hours after inhalation therapy on FEV1 and sputum inflammatory indices in children with clinically defined chronic asthma. METHODS: Thirty subjects with asthma included 14 current symptomatic asthmatics and 14 normal controls inhaled 4.5% hypertonic saline for 10 minutes by nebulizer. The expectorated sputum were collected from all asthmatics before and 3 hours after corticosteroid inhalation for children with asthma and were reduced by dithiotreitol. Total cell counts and differentials were determined. ECP was measured by CAP system. Interleukin-5, GM-CSF and albumin were measured by double sandwich ELISA. RESULTS: The mean eosinophil percentage and ECP in induced sputum of asthmatics were significantly higher than that of controls. The induced sputum samples obtained after glucocorticoid inhalation showed a significant reduction in mean eosinophil percentage, but FEV1, IL-5, GM-CSF, albumin, and ECP values were not significantly decreased. CONCLUSION: The present results in induced sputum may be interpreted to reflect direct steroid action on airways and lack of effect on bone marrow effectors at 3 hours after glucocorticoid inhalation.     

The safety of inhaled beta-agonist bronchodilators during pregnancy

To assess the safety of inhaled beta-agonist bronchodilators during pregnancy, perinatal outcomes in 259 prospectively managed women with asthma using these medications during pregnancy were compared to perinatal outcomes in 101 concurrently followed pregnant subjects with asthma not using inhaled bronchodilators and to perinatal outcomes in 295 concurrently followed pregnant control subjects without asthma. No significant differences between women with asthma using inhaled bronchodilators and subjects not receiving inhaled bronchodilators were found in the following parameters: perinatal mortality, congenital malformations, preterm births, low birth weight infants, mean birth weight, small for gestational age or low ponderal index infants, Apgar scores, labor/delivery complications, or postpartum bleeding. Increased incidences of maternal chronic and pregnancy-induced hypertension and transient tachypnea of the neonate were observed in the pregnancies of subjects with asthma using regular inhaled bronchodilators compared to control subjects, but a logistic regression analysis within the sample of subjects with asthma did not significantly associate the use of inhaled bronchodilators with these outcomes. In the light of the known substantial perinatal risks of severe, uncontrolled asthma and the relatively sparse evidence of human gestational safety for alternative asthma medications, these data support the use of inhaled beta-agonist bronchodilators as part of the management of asthma during pregnancy.