Basal ganglia neural activity during operant feeding behavior in the monkey: relation to sensory integration and motor execution

The activity of single neurons in the caudate nucleus (CD), globus pallidus (GP), substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), and ventral tegmental area (VTA) was recorded during an operant feeding task in the monkey. The task had three phases: recognition of the food or nonfood stimulus (1st phase), bar pressing to obtain access to the stimulus (2nd phase), and ingestion (3rd phase). Data were collected from 351 neurons in CD, 344 in GP, 261 in SNr, and 275 in VTA. Neurons in the dorsolateral part of the CD, GP, and SNr responded primarily to motor events of feeding, i.e., extension/flexion of the arm, bar pressing, chewing, grasping or gazing. Neurons in the ventromedial part of the CD and rostroventral part of the GP exhibited differential responses to the presentation of food and nonfood during the recognition and bar pressing phases of the task. Neurons in the VTA increased their firing early in the bar pressing phase and then decreased their firing during ingestion. The data suggest that the dorsolateral part of the basal ganglia is involved mainly in motor function, while the ventromedial part may reflect the connection between motivation and motor output.     

Functional role of the limbic system and basal ganglia in motivated behaviors

It has been suggested that the cortico- and limbic-striatal systems are important in various motor functions such as motivated behaviors. In this paper we review our previous studies to investigate neuronal mechanisms of feeding behaviors. We recorded neuronal activity from the amygdala, caudate nucleus, globus pallidus, and substantia nigra during feeding behavior in monkeys, and compared neuronal responses recorded from these brain areas. First, of 710 amygdalar neurons tested, 129 (18.2%) responded to single sensory stimulation (48 to vision, 32 to audition, 49 to ingestion), 142 (20%) to multimodal stimulation, and 20 to only one item with affective significance. Eight food related amygdalar neurons were tested in reversal by salting food or introducing saline, and all responses were modulated by reversal. These results suggest that the amygdala might be important in ongoing recognition of the affective significance of complex stimuli (food-nonfood discrimination).

Second, activity was recorded from 351 neurons in the head of the caudate nucleus of monkeys during an operant feeding task. The 16% of these neurons responded in the discrimination phase. Some of these neurons responded specifically to food. The magnitude of these food-specific neurons depend on the rewarding nature of the food (reward value), and was inversely related to the latency of the onset of bar press. Of the caudate neurons, 10% responded in the bar press phase. Activity of most neurons which responded in the bar press phase was not correlated to individual bar presses. Cooling of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex abolished sustained responses during bar pressing, but did not abolish the feeding behavior. However, bar press speed tended to be delayed by prefrontal cooling.

Third, activity of 358 neurons was recorded from the monkey globus pallidus, and 204 neurons responded during the feeding task. In the globus pallidus, few neurons responded to food in the discrimination phase. On the other hand, activity of most responsive neurons changed during bar press and/or ingestion phases. Activity of about half of these responsive neurons was directly related to specific feeding motor acts such as arm extension, flexion, bar pressing, grasping, chewing, etc. Some of these neurons showed motor-related responses with gradual and preparatory responses. These motor-related neurons were located mainly in the caudodorsal part of the globus pallidus. On the other hand, about one third, especially in the rostroventral part of the globus pallidus, showed dissociating responses in that they responded during bar pressing for food or during ingestion in an operant task, but not during bar pressing for nonfood or during forcible ingestion. The response magnitude of the neurons during arm extension and bar pressing depended on the nature of the food.

Fourth, activity of 261 neurons was recorded from the substantia nigra pars reticulata. Most of responding neurons (more than two-thirds of the recorded neurons) responded during the bar press and/or ingestion phases. Activity of the one-third of neurons was related to specific motor execution such as arm extension, flexion and bar pressing, but not to motor preparation. These neurons were located mainly in the rostral part of the nucleus. More than one-third of the recorded neurons responded during feed and/or drinking acts and intra- and perioral sensory stimuli, and were located mainly in the caudomedial part of the nucleus.

Based upon these responses and known anatomical evidence, various information including that from the amygdala and prefrontal cortex is integrated in the basal ganglia, and converted to coordinated motivated behaviors such as feeding behavior.

     

Caudate unit activity during operant feeding behavior in monkeys and modulation by cooling prefrontal cortex

Activity was recorded from 351 neurons in the head of the caudate nucleus (CD) of monkeys during an operant feeding task consisting of: (1) food or non-food presentation (P); (2) bar pressing (B); and (3) food acquisition and ingestion (I). Of 45 neurons which responded in the P phase and were tested systematically, 27 responded to visual presentation of both food and non-food (non-specific response), and 18 responded to food presentation only (food specific response). The magnitude of food specific responses depended on the nature of the food and was inversely related to the latency of the onset of bar pressing. Thirty-five neurons responded in the B phase: 28 changed firing rate continuously with no correlation to individual bar presses, while the activity of the other 7 was related to each bar press. In the I phase, 62 neurons responded to separate events: the activity of more than half (39 neurons) was often related to chewing movement or gustatory stimuli, and that of one third (23 neurons) changed during individual arm movements. The neurons which responded in the P phase were found to be distributed widely in the head of the CD except for its central zone, while the neurons which responded in the I phase were in the medial part. Cooling of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex abolished the continuous responses seen in the B phase, but did not abolish the feeding behavior. The data suggest that in the head of the CD there are several groups of neurons that have different functions and different distributions: food specific, sensory integration responses, non-motor responses driven by the frontal cortex, motor responses coupled to various movements, and sensory responses which apparently originate in the intra-oral cavity. These functions may arise sequentially, or in correspondence with integration of the sensory and motor systems to produce coordinated behavior.     

Single neuron activity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of monkey during operant behavior sustained by food reward

The activity of 190 neurons was recorded from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of monkeys during an operant task that consisted of 3 phases: visual discrimination of food and non-food, bar pressing to gain access to the food and ingestion. In area 8, a fairly large proportion of the 49 recorded neurons responded in both the visual discrimination (37%) and motor initiation (35%) phases. Some functional heterogeneity seems evident within area 8 since visual discrimination responses were rostral, visuokinesis was central and motor initiation was in the caudal bank of the arcuate sulcus. Neurons in area 9 responded primarily (37%) during the bar pressing phase and less during the visual discrimination phase. Neurons in area 10 responded variously during most phases of the task--food discrimination, bar pressing, and ingestion. Neurons in the periprincipal sulcal area usually responded in the visual discrimination phase, but some which did not respond to food presented in front of the subject responded to meaningful visual or auditory cues that were related to food reward. The data suggest that neurons in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex have multiple functions related to all phases of complex, learned feeding behavior. Functional roles of the prefrontal cortex and the lateral hypothalamus in development of feeding behavior are discussed.     

Neuronal activity in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) during motivated bar press feeding in the monkey

Neuronal activity of 58 dopaminergic (DA) and 200 non-dopaminergic (non-DA) neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) of female monkeys was recorded, and correlation to bar press feeding, sensory stimulation and change in motivation was investigated. DA neurons, judged by duration of action potentials (more than 2.5 ms) and responsiveness to apomorphine, had lower firing rates (0-8 impulses/s); non-DA neurons had intermediate firing rates (10-30 impulses/s). Two-thirds of the DA and non-DA neurons responded in bar press feeding; the former with mostly tonic and the latter with phasic responses. Fifteen neurons (5%) responded phasically to arm extension toward the bar, 124 (excitation 88, inhibition 36, 45%) during bar press (BP), and 91 (excitation 32, inhibition 59, 33%) during ingestion reward (RW). Most BP responses (84/124, 68%) continued tonically throughout the BP period with no correlation to each BP movement. In 14 neurons (14/124, 11%), firing showed a specific variation: transient early BP responses shifted to tonic steady ones in palatable food trials, and the shifts correlated well with BP speed. In 20 other neurons, firing increased during BP hip lifting, and at specific vocalization to ask for food; it decreased during food ingestion, drinking and inguino-crural stimulation. Apomorphine administration decreased firing for the first 5-15 min, then increased it with frequent lip smacking, nausea, involuntary movement and vocalization. Thus VTA neurons showed mostly steady tonic responses but some specific phasic responses. They responded not only to motor events but also in close relation to changes of motivational aspects. Neuronal responses were excitation during procurement of reward and inhibition during or after perception of reward. This modulation in firing, might be important in the initiation and execution of movement and/or motivated behavior.     

Visual responses related to food discrimination in monkey lateral hypothalamus during operant feeding behavior

Single neuron activity was recorded from monkey lateral hypothalamic area (LHA) to relate neuronal events to food discrimination and initiation of procurement movement in operant bar press feeding behavior. Of 429 neurons tested, 68 (16%) responded during visual phase. Of these, 30 (7%) responded selectively to the sight of food or non-food associated with a juice reward, but not to the sight of meaningless non-food or food associated with aversive saline. Neuronal activity related to discrimination was readily influenced by extinction, reversal or satiation. The strength of visual responses was correlated with latency of bar press initiation and speed of bar pressing, but was not related directly to bar press movement. These suggest that the LHA is deeply involved in discrimination of reinforcement or non-reinforcement, and might be associated with higher functions to regulate internal states such as physiological need to get food during operant feeding behavior.     

Behavioral significance of monkey hypothalamic glucose-sensitive neurons

Feeding-related neuronal activity of lateral hypothalamic glucose-sensitive and glucose-insensitive neurons was investigated in behaving monkeys. The behavioral paradigm was a high fixed ratio of bar pressing for food reward signaled by light and tone cues. Twenty-seven percent of the neurons tested were glucose-sensitive. The population of neurons which changed in firing rate during the feeding task was higher among glucose-sensitive cells than among glucose-insensitive cells. The activity of many glucose-sensitive neurons decreased during the bar pressing and reward periods. A small population of glucose-sensitive neurons responded to cue stimuli. The results suggest that glucose-sensitive neurons are mainly involved in the drive and/or reward mechanism of feeding behavior, and that these cells may have specific roles in neural control of hunger-motivated food acquisition.     

Neuronal responses in monkey lateral hypothalamus during operant feeding behavior

Single neuron activity was recorded from monkey lateral hypothalamus to investigate neuronal events correlated with operant bar press feeding behavior. The behavioral paradigm was divided into three phase: visual (discrimination), bar press (procurement), and ingestion (consummatory). Of 669 neurons tested, 158 (24%) responded in one or more phases. During the visual phase, 106 neurons (16%) responded. Of 80 neurons that responded in the visual phase and were tested systematically, 33 (41%, 33/80) responded selectively to the sight of food or nonfood objects associated with a juice reward, but not to the sight of nonfood or objects associated with aversive saline. Neuronal activity related to discrimination was modulated by satiation and learning (i.e., acquisition and extinction). During the bar press phase, 51 neurons (7.6%) responded. These responded tonically during the early or late stage of the bar press period, but did not depend on individual bar pressing motions. During ingestion, 90 neurons (13%) responded. The ingestion response was modulated by palatability of food and satiation. Data suggest that the LHA is deeply involved in operant feeding behavior; discrimination of food, drive to get food, and perception of reward, all of which are affected by learning and internal states such as hunger and satiety.     

Internal and external information processing by lateral hypothalamic glucose-sensitive and insensitive neurons during bar press feeding in the monkey

Single neuron activities in the lateral hypothalamic area (LHA) were recorded during bar press feeding task in the monkey. First registered neurons were sorted into 2 groups, glucose-sensitive (GS) and glucose-insensitive (GIS) neurons, depending on their glucose sensitivity. Then firing variations to feeding, electrophoretically applied catecholamines and opiate, and to odor and taste stimuli were investigated. GS neurons responded to dopamine, noradrenaline and morphine more often than GIS neurons. In feeding task GS neurons responded during bar press (BP) and reward (RW) periods with long-lasting inhibition of firing and at cue tone (CT) with transient inhibition, while GIS neurons responded during BP and RW periods mainly with excitation and at cue light (CL) with excitation. A majority of GS neurons responded to both odor and taste stimuli more often than GIS neurons. Data suggest that these two kinds of neurons in the LHA may be involved in different functional aspects of feeding: GS neurons, mainly in internal information processing and reward mechanism, and GIS neurons, in external information processing and motor aspects.     

Topographic distribution of modality-specific amygdalar neurons in alert monkey

Neuronal activity in the amygdala (AM) was recorded from alert monkeys during performance of tasks that led to presentation of rewarding or aversive stimuli. The tasks had 3 phases: (1) discrimination (visual, auditory), (2) operant response (bar pressing), and (3) ingestion (reward) or avoidance (aversion). Neuronal activity was analyzed and compared during each of these phases. Of 585 AM neurons tested, 312 (53.3%) responded to at least one stimulus in one or more of 5 major groups: vision related, audition related, ingestion related, multimodal, and selective. Forty neurons (6.8%) in the anterior dorsolateral capsule of the basolateral nuclei responded exclusively to visual stimuli (vision related). Twenty-six neurons (4.4%) further posterior in the basolateral group responded only to auditory stimuli (audition related). During ingestion an additional 41 neurons (7.0%) increased their activity (ingestion related). These were in the corticomedial group and at the boundaries between the nuclei of the basolateral group. Of these, 27 responded only in the ingestion phase, 11 during ingestion and at the sight of food, and 3 during ingestion and to certain sounds. Throughout the AM other neurons (n = 117, 20.0%) responded to visual, auditory, and somesthetic stimuli and, when tested, to involuntary ingestion of liquid (multimodal). Of these, 40 responded transiently (phasic; 36 excited, 4 inhibited). The remaining 77 maintained their altered activity into the subsequent phases of the task (tonic; 69 excited, 8 inhibited). In each of these 4 categories, most cells were activated primarily by novel or unfamiliar stimuli, and their responses habituated during repeated stimulation. A small number of cells in the basolateral and the basomedial nuclei (n = 14, 2.4%) were highly selective in that they responded specifically to one biologically significant object or sound more than to any other stimuli (selective). Some of these neurons responded to both sight and ingestion of a specific food. In summary, most AM neurons responded vigorously to novel stimuli, and some of the neurons had multimodal responsiveness. These results suggest the AM is related to processing of new environmental stimuli and to those cross-modal association.     

Complementary distribution of glutamatergic cerebellar and GABAergic basal ganglia afferents to the rat motor thalamic nuclei

Motor thalamic nuclei, ventral anterior (VA), ventral lateral (VL) and ventral medial (VM) nuclei, receive massive glutamatergic and GABAergic afferents from the cerebellum and basal ganglia, respectively. In the present study, these afferents were characterized with immunoreactivities for glutamic acid decarboxylase of 67 kDa (GAD67) and vesicular glutamate transporter (VGluT)2, and examined by combining immunocytochemistry with the anterograde axonal labeling and neuronal depletion methods in the rat brain. VGluT2 immunoreactivity was intense in the caudodorsal portion of the VA-VL, whereas GAD67 immunoreactivity was abundant in the VM and rostroventral portion of the VA-VL. The rostroventral VA-VL and VM contained two types of GAD67-immunopositive varicosities (large and small), but the caudodorsal VA-VL comprised small ones alone. VGluT2-immunopositive varicosities were much larger in the caudodorsal VA-VL than those in the rostroventral VA-VL and VM. When anterograde tracers were injected into the basal ganglia output nuclei, the vast majority of labeled axon varicosities were large and distributed in the rostroventral VA-VL and VM, showing immunoreactivity for GAD67, but not for VGluT2. Only the large GAD67-immunopositive varicosities were mostly abolished by kainic acid depletion of substantia nigra neurons. In contrast, large to giant axon varicosities derived from the deep cerebellar nuclei were distributed mostly in the caudodorsal VA-VL, displaying VGluT2 immunoreactivity. The VGluT2-positive varicosities disappeared from the core portion of the caudodorsal VA-VL by depletion of cerebellar nucleus neurons. Thus, complementary distributions of large VGluT2- and GAD67-positive terminals in the motor thalamic nuclei are considered to reflect glutamatergic cerebellar and GABAergic basal ganglia afferents, respectively.     

Reward related neuronal activity in monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during feeding behavior

Extracellular single neuron activity was recorded in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DL) during bar pressing for food reward. Most of the reward-related neurons were located around the rostral end of the principal sulcus. Neuronal activity was diminished, abolished, or reversed when quinine adulterated food (aversive food) was given as a reinforcement. Cue-related neurons tended to be located more caudally in the DL. The activity of these neurons was not modulated by the nature of the reward as much as that of the reward-related neurons. The results suggest that DL neurons are not functionally homogeneous.     

Role of bar press-related neurons in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during task performance by monkey

Extracellular single neuron activity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DL) was recorded in the monkey, during bar pressing for reward. The bar press-related neurons which exhibited excitation or inhibition during the bar press period were found to be scattered diffusely in the DL. Activity changes that arose during the bar press period also appeared when the experimenter pressed the bar for the monkey. When delivery of food was delayed for a random time after cue tone on, bar press responses were still confined to the bar press period and did not extend beyond the cue tone. These results, together with the lesion studies, suggest that bar press-related neurons are involved in the animal's concentration during the bar press period.     

Catecholaminergic mechanisms of feeding-related lateral hypothalamic activity in the monkey

The functional role of the catecholaminergic mechanism in the lateral hypothalamus (LHA), in feeding behavior of the monkey was investigated by single neuron activity recording and electrophoretic application of dopamine (DA), noradrenaline (NA) and their antagonists. The feeding paradigm had 4 phases: cue light (CL) signaled start of bar press; bar press (BP, 20-30 times); short cue tone (CT) triggered by last bar press signaled presentation of food; and ingestion-reward (RW). Of 312 neurons tested, 189 (61%) responded in one or more phases of the feeding task. Two types of response were observed: CL- or CT-related transient, and BP- or RW-related long-lasting responses. These feeding-related responses depended on the nature of the food and on the hunger-satiety level. DA excited or inhibited different neurons, while NA mainly inhibited firing. DA-sensitive neurons responded more often in the feeding task than insensitive neurons due mainly to differences in responsiveness to CL on (chi 2 test, P less than 0.01), at motor initiation, and during BP (P less than 0.05). Spiperone blocked the former two responses. NA-sensitive neurons responded more often in the feeding task due to responsiveness during BP and RW (P less than 0.01). Sotalol blocked some BP-related responses, and phenoxybenzamine and sotalol blocked the CT-related responses. The data suggest that dopaminergic and noradrenergic inputs in the LHA are crucial in task initiation and reward processing, respectively. Integration of these catecholaminergic and other inputs in the LHA might be important in accomplishing motivated feeding.     

Context-dependent responses of primate nucleus basalis neurons in a go/no-go task

In previous studies involving monkeys performing behavioral tasks, neurons in the nucleus basalis frequently had significant changes in discharge rate when the animal made a movement in response to a sensory stimulus in order to obtain a reward. To determine whether such responses of basalis neurons are primarily sensory or motor in nature, the activity of single basalis neurons was recorded in monkeys performing a go/no-go (GNG) task which provided a dissociation between sensory and motor neuronal responses. In a sample of 425 basalis neurons, 326 (77%) had significant changes in firing in at least one phase of the GNG task. Most of the task-related neurons (70%) responded in the choice phase in which the animal either made an arm movement (go condition) or kept its arm motionless (no-go condition) in order to obtain a water reward. Of 253 neurons that responded in the choice phase, 88% had changes in firing in the no-go condition that were equal to or, in some cases, greater than the changes in firing in the go condition. Therefore, most responses of basalis neurons in the choice phase could not be specific for the arm movement because they occurred when there was no arm movement at all. The visual stimulus presented in the choice phase was also presented earlier on each trial in the cue phase. Although 70% of the task-related basalis neurons responded in the choice phase, only 5% had detectable changes in firing in the cue phase. Of 251 neurons responding in the cue or choice phase, 59% had significantly larger changes in firing in the choice phase than in the cue phase, whereas only one neuron had a larger response in the cue phase. Therefore, most responses of basalis neurons in the choice phase could not be specific for the visual stimulus because similar responses did not occur when the same stimulus was presented in the cue phase. These results indicate that the frequent responses of basalis neurons in the choice phase are neither purely sensory nor motor in nature, but are highly dependent on the context of the stimulus or movement. The neuronal responses in the choice phase may reflect either transient increases in arousal or decision-making processes.     

Responses of striatal neurons in the behaving monkey. 1. Head of the caudate nucleus

The activity of 394 neurons in the head of the caudate nucleus and the most anterior part of the putamen was analyzed in 3 behaving rhesus monkeys in order to analyze the functions of this part of the striatum. Of these neurons, 64.2% responded in the tests used in relation to, for example, environmental events, movements made by the monkey, the performance of a visual discrimination, or during feeding. However, only relatively small proportions of these neurons had responses which were unconditionally related to visual (9.6%), auditory (3.5%), or gustatory (0.5%) stimuli, or to movements (4.1%). Instead, the majority of the responsive neurons had activity in relation to stimuli or movements which was conditional, in that the responses occurred in only some test situations, and were often dependent on the performance of a task by the monkeys. Thus, it was found in the visual discrimination task that 14.5% of the neurons responded during a 0.5 sec tone/light cue period which signalled the start of each trial; 31.1% responded in the period in which the discriminative visual stimuli were shown, with 24.3% of these responding more to either the visual stimulus which signified food reward or to that which signified punishment; and 6.2% responded in relation to lick responses. Yet these neurons typically did not respond in relation to the cue stimuli, to the visual stimuli, or to movements, when these occurred independently of the task, or when performance of the task was prevented. Comparably, of the neurons tested during feeding, 25.8% responded when the food was seen by the monkey, 6.2% when he tasted it, and 22.4% during a cue given by the experimenter that a food or non-food object was about to be presented. However, only few of these neurons had responses to the same stimuli presented in different situations.It is concluded that many neurons in the head of the caudate nucleus and the most anterior part of the putamen respond in relation to events which are used as cues to prepare for the performance of tasks, including feeding, in which movements must be initiated. Other neurons respond in relation to the stimuli used and the movements made in these tasks. However, the majority of these neurons do not have unconditional sensory or motor responses. It is therefore suggested that the anterior neostriatum contains neuronal mechanisms which are important in the process by which environmental cues are used in the preparation of behavioral responses, and in the initiation of particular behavioral responses made in particular situations to particular environmental stimuli. Deficits in the initiation of movements following damage to striatal pathways may arise in part because of interference with these functions of the anterior neostriatum.     

Neural correlates to both emotion and cognitive functions in the monkey amygdala

Recent lesion and non-invasive studies identify the medial temporal lobe, including the amygdala, not only with emotion but also with working memory in relation to the prefrontal cortex. In the present study, amygdalar neuronal activity was recorded from monkeys during performance of discrimination tasks that led to presentation of emotion-related (rewarding or aversive) stimuli. The task had three phases: (1) discrimination (visual, auditory), (2) operant response (bar pressing) and (3) ingestion (reward) or avoidance (aversion). These neurons were further analyzed by a short-term memory task, delayed pair comparison (DPC) using colored lamps. Of 585 amygdalar neurons, 107 responded primarily to single sensory stimulation (40 vision related, 26 audition related, 41 ingestion related), 117 to multimodal stimulation (multimodal) and 14 responded selectively to only one item (selective). Of 417 neurons tested by the DPC, 122 responded in one or more phases. Of these 122 neurons, 10.7% responded in the delay period. These delay-responsive neurons also responded to various objects with positive and negative affective significance. These results suggest that amygdalar neurons are not specifically related to working memory, as are those in the inferotemporal and prefrontal cortices, but are related to more general non-specific functions or processes such as arousal or attention during the cognitive tasks. A functional role of the amygdala in working memory is discussed in terms of recent non-invasive studies suggesting a functional coupling between the amygdala and prefrontal cortex.     

Amygdaloid neuronal responses to complex visual stimuli in an operant feeding situation in the monkey

In chronically prepared monkeys, 337 neurons were recorded from the anterolateral amygdala during an operant task that required visual discrimination. Twelve percent (39/337) of the neurons responded to one or more of food or non-food visual stimuli. A subset of these responsive neurons was selectively sensitive to the sight of non-food objects with aversive associations. Simultaneous presentation of a food stimulus with the aversive object inhibited the response of these neurons. These response characteristics could not be explained by simple sensory processing of the visual stimuli. It is suggested that the amygdala plays an important role in the elaboration of motivational behavior by using the complex or associative properties of visual stimuli.     

Neostriatal evoked inhibition and effects of dopamine on globus pallidal neurons in rat slice preparations

Spontaneous unit discharges were recorded extracellularly from globus pallidal (GP) neurons in rat slice preparations. The firing rates of GP neurons ranged from 2.0 to 24.0 spikes/s and their firing patterns were predominantly of two types: regular and irregular. Stimulation of the neostriatum evoked two distinct types of inhibition which were dependent on GP neuronal firing patterns, a brief inhibition (about 75 ms) followed by resetting rhythmic neuronal activities and a relatively long-term inhibition (about 100 ms). These inhibitions evoked by neostriatal stimulation were attenuated or completely blocked by bath application of either bicuculline or strychnine (2 X 10(-5)-10(-4) M) but not by naloxone. Bath application of dopamine (10(-4)-10(-3) M) produced slow increases in the firing rates by 30-65% in about a half of GP neurons tested. Iontophoretic application of dopamine (10-20 nA) attenuated inhibition in GP neurons by 40-55% induced by either iontophoretically applied GABA (5-30 nA) or neostriatal stimulation without affecting their spontaneous firings. These results suggest that dopamine may produce change in the firing patterns of GP neurons by either acting directly or attenuating GABAergic inhibitory transmission from the neostriatum.     

Cortically evoked responses of human pallidal neurons recorded during stereotactic neurosurgery

Responses of neurons in the globus pallidus (GP) to cortical stimulation were recorded for the first time in humans. We performed microelectrode recordings of GP neurons in 10 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and 1 cervical dystonia (CD) patient during surgeries to implant bilateral deep brain stimulation electrodes in the GP. To identify the motor territories in the external (GPe) and internal (GPi) segments of the GP, unitary responses evoked by stimulation of the primary motor cortex were observed by constructing peristimulus time histograms. Neurons in the motor territories of the GPe and GPi responded to cortical stimulation. Response patterns observed in the PD patients were combinations of an early excitation, an inhibition, and a late excitation. In addition, in the CD patient, a long‐lasting inhibition was prominent, suggesting increased activity along the cortico‐striato‐GPe/GPi pathways. The firing rates of GPe and GPi neurons in the CD patient were lower than those in the PD patients. Many GPe and GPi neurons of the PD and CD patients showed burst or oscillatory burst activity. Effective cathodal contacts tended to be located close to the responding neurons. Such unitary responses induced by cortical stimulation may be of use to target motor territories of the GP for stereotactic functional neurosurgery. Future findings utilizing this method may give us new insights into understanding the pathophysiology of movement disorders. © 2011 Movement Disorder Society