The impact of cancer treatment on quality of life outcomes for patients with localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of localized prostate cancer treatment on general, cancer specific and symptom domains of quality of life for up to 5 years after diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 842 men from the Health Professionals Followup Study, diagnosed between 1993 and 1998, were included in cross-sectional analyses of quality of life associated with prostate cancer treatment. A subset of 146 men diagnosed after 1995 were followed prospectively. Quality of life was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Health Status Survey, Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System Short Form and University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index by mailed questionnaires. Primary treatment modality was taken from medical records and patient self-report. RESULTS: Significant treatment differences were observed in all quality of life measures, with the largest occurring in sexual, urinary and bowel symptoms. Bowel function was significantly worse in patients who received external radiation and brachytherapy compared with prostatectomy (p <0.05). Although they had better or equivalent urinary and sexual function (p <0.05), patients treated with external radiation, hormones or watchful waiting had lower generic quality of life scores in multiple domains compared with those who underwent prostatectomy. Patients who had brachytherapy had similar generic quality of life outcomes compared with prostatectomy in all domains. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that important differences in quality of life go beyond known physical symptoms associated with various prostate cancer treatment options, many of which involve making a trade-off. It is important for patients with prostate cancer and health care providers to consider these differences while making treatment decisions.     

The addition of chemotherapy in the definitive management of high risk prostate cancer

In attempt to improve long-term disease control outcomes for high-risk prostate cancer, numerous clinical trials have tested the addition of chemotherapy (CTX)—either adjuvant or neoadjuvant—to definitive local therapy, either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT).Neoadjuvant trials generally confirm safety, feasibility, and pre-RP PSA reduction, but rates of pathologic complete response are rare, and no indications for neoadjuvant CTX have been firmly established. Adjuvant regimens have included CTX alone or in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).Here we provide a review of the relevant literature, and also quantify utilization of CTX in the definitive management of localized high-risk prostate cancer by querying the National Cancer Data Base. Between 2004 and 2013, 177 patients (of 29,659 total) treated with definitive RT, and 995 (of 367,570 total) treated with RP had CTX incorporated into their treatment regimens. Low numbers of RT?+?CTX patients precluded further analysis of this population, but we investigated the impact of CTX on overall survival (OS) for patients treated with RP +/? CTX. Disease-free survival or biochemical-recurrence-free survival are not available through the National Cancer Data Base. Propensity-score matching was conducted as patients treated with CTX were a higher-risk group. For nonmatched groups, OS at 5-years was 89.6% for the CTX group vs. 95.6%, for the no-CTX group (P < 0.01). The difference in OS between CTX and no-CTX groups did not persist after propensity-score matching, with 5-year OS 89.6% vs. 90.9%, respectively (Hazard ratio 0.99; P?=?0.88).In summary, CTX was not shown to improve OS in this retrospective study. Multimodal regimens—such as RP followed by ADT, RT, and CTX; or RT in conjunction with ADT followed by CTX—have shown promise, but long-term follow-up of randomized data is required.