Oral doxifluridine plus leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer: randomized phase II trial with intravenous 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin

This phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of oral doxifluridine plus leucovorin as a randomized trial with those of intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients with metastatic CRC were randomized in either group A (oral doxifluridine 1,000 mg/m /d plus leucovorin 30 mg/d on days 1 to 7 and 15 to 21 of each cycle), or group B (intravenous 5-FU 400 mg/m /d plus leucovorin 20 mg/m /d on days 1-5 of each cycle), with the cycles repeated every 4 weeks. Between July 1998 and May 2000, 77 patients were enrolled (38 in group A and 39 in group B). Response rates were 23.7% (95% CI, 11-42%) in group A, and 15.4% (95% CI, 0-25%) in group B on an intent-to-treat analysis. The median response durations of the two groups were similar with 5.6 months in group A and 5.5 months in group B. Progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.4 months and 14.9 months in group A; 4.7 months and 19.5 months in group B. Toxicities in both groups were generally mild and reversible. This study shows that a combination of oral doxifluridine plus leucovorin can be active and safe as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic CRC.     

Outpatient weekly high-dose continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil plus oral leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. A phase II trial

BACKGROUND:: Background: In a previous phase I–II trial we showed thatmaximum tolerable dose (MTD) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) a weekly48-hour continuous infusion (CI) was 3.5 g/m². In a subsequentconfirmative phase II trial with 85 evaluable patients, a 38.5%response rate was obtained, and a median survival of 12 months.These data were comparable to those achieved by biochemicalmodulation of 5-FU with leucovorin. On this basis we attemptedto modulate high-dose 5-FU (3 g/m²) with oral leucovorin (LV)but the regimen too toxic and the dose had to be reduced. Anew phase II trial with 2 g/m²/week plus oral leucovorin wasplanned. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: From July 1992 to June 1994, 110 previously untreated patientswith advanced, measurable colorectal cancer were included ina multicenter study. The patients received, on an outpatientbasis, 5-FU 2 g/m² by continuous infusion for 48 hours oncea week until progression or the appearance of toxic effects.Oral leucovorin (60 mg every six hours) was also given duringthe 5-FU infusion. RESULTS:: Patients received a median dose intensity of 5-FU of 1.6 g/m²/week(range 0.9–2). Three complete responses and 36 partialresponses were observed. The overall response rate was 37.5%(95% CI, 28% to 46.8%), the median time to progression 7.4 monthsand median survival 14.5 months. W.H.O. grade 3 diarrhea occurredin 27 patients (24.5%); grade 3 mucositis was observed in 9(8.1%) patients and grade 4 in one. Grade 3 nausea and vomitingwas reported in 13 (11.7%) patients, while grade 3 hand-footsyndrome was detected in only 5 (4.5%). Grade 4 leukopenia occurredin one patient and grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia in two. CONCLUSION:: Oral leucovorin modulation of weekly 48-hour continuous infusionof 5-FU at 2 g/m² is an active regimen, with diarrhea and mucositisas the main limiting toxic effects. Its antitumor activity doesnot seem superior to that obtained with a weekly 48-hour continuousinfusion of 5-FU alone at a dose of 3.5 g/m². advanced colorectal cancer, biochemical modulation, continuous infusion, fluorouracil, phase II trial     

Phase II trial of Uracil/Tegafur plus leucovorin and celecoxib combined with radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Background and purpose

To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of a short intensive Uracil/Tegafur (UFT) based chemoradiotherapy scheme combined with celecoxib in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Material and methods

The Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam and the Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam enrolled 83 eligible patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer in a prospective multicentre phase II study. Median age was 62 years, median tumour size 40 mm and the majority of the patients (85%) had pancreatic head cancers. Treatment consisted of 20 × 2.5 Gy radiotherapy combined with UFT 300 mg/m² per day, leucovorin (folinic acid) 30 mg and celecoxib 800 mg for 28 days concomitant with radiotherapy. Four patients were lost to follow-up.

Results

Full treatment compliance was achieved in 55% of patients, 80% received at least 3 weeks of treatment. No partial or complete response was observed. Median survival was 10.6 months and median time to progression 6.9 months. Toxicity was substantial with 28% grades III and IV gastro-intestinal toxicity and two early toxic deaths.

Conclusions

Based on the lack of response, the substantial toxicity of mainly gastro-intestinal origin and the reported mediocre overall and progression free survival, we cannot advise our short intensive chemoradiotherapy schedule combined with celecoxib as the standard treatment.     

Efficacy of oral tegafur modulation by uracil and leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. A phase II study

A phase II study was performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of UFT (tegafur-uracil in the molar ratio 1: 4) modulated with leucovorin (LV) in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC). 79 patients with measurable advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) and no prior chemotherapy were included. 75 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. The regimen consisted of LV 500 mg/m² administered intravenously on day 1, followed by oral UFT 390 mg/m² on days 1–14. Patients received oral LV 15 mg every 12 h on days 2–14. Treatment was repeated every 28 days for a minimum of four courses per patient. Three hundred and ninety-eight cycles of chemotherapy were delivered (median five per patient). 7 patients (9%) had a complete response, and 22 a partial response for an overall response rate of 39%. Mild gastrointestinal toxicity was dose limiting: grade 3–4 diarrhoea appeared in 9% of patients. Other grade 3–4 toxicities were nausea/vomiting and mucositis in 4% of patients, gastric pain and leucopenia in 3%. Oral UFT modulated by oral LV is active in advanced CRC and can be administered on an outpatient basis with no significant toxicity requiring hospitalisation. Given its excellent tolerance profile and low toxicity, the regimen should be thoroughly studied and compared with 5-fluorouracil modulated by LV.     

Efficacy of tegafur/uracil plus oral leucovorin therapy for advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of tegafur/uracil (UFT) and oral Leucovorin(UZEL) in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. Eight patients were treated with UFT/UZEL therapy as a first-line chemotherapy. UFT(300 mg/m(2)/day) and UZEL (75 mg/body/day) were administered orally for 28 consecutive days followed by a 7-day rest period, and this schedule was repeated every 5 weeks. The mean of treatment courses given to the patients was 7.6. Tumor response was evaluated in 7 patients who had assessable lesions, and the response rate was 86% (6 PR and 1 NC). Adverse reactions of grade 3 were observed in 2 patients (25%), but toxicity did not cause a discontinuance of treatment in any case. The UFT/UZEL therapy was considered to be a promising regimen for advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer from a standpoint of effect, safety and QOL of patients.     

A phase II trial of weekly high dose continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil plus oral leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Background. In a previous Phase II trial, the authors showed that a weekly continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at a dose of 3.5 g/m² for 48 hours is an active treatment for advanced colorectal cancer. The overall response rate was 38.5%, and the median survival was 12 months. These data were comparable to those achieved by biochemical modulation of 5-FU with leucovorin. To study the modulation of this weekly, high dose, continuous infusion 5-FU with oral leucovorin, a new Phase II trial was planned. Methods. From December 1991 to July 1992, 43 previously untreated patients with measurable advanced colorectal cancer were included in a multicenter study. They received on an outpatient basis 5-FU at a weekly dose of 3 g/m² by continuous infusion for 48 hours until progression or toxicity. Oral leucovorin (60 mg every 6 hours) also was given during the infusion of 5-FU. Results. Patients received a median dose intensity of 5-FU of 2.2 g/m²/week (range, 0.76-3 g/m²/week). One complete response and 11 partial responses were observed. The overall response rate was 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16–45%). Median time to progression was 7 months, and the median survival was 15 months. World Health Organization Grades 3 and 4 diarrhea were observed in 19 (45%) and 6 (14%) patients, respectively. Grade 3 mucositis also was observed in 10 (24%) patients, and Grade 4 mucositis was observed in 1. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting were reported in seven (17%) patients. Grade 3 hand–foot syndrome was detected in only two (2.5%) patients. No leukopenia or thrombocytopenia was observed. Conclusions. Oral leucovorin modulation of a weekly 48-hour infusion of 5-FU at a dose of 3 g/m² of leucovorin is a toxic regimen, always requiring dose reduction, with diarrhea and mucositis as the main limiting toxicities. Its antitumor activity does not seem superior to that observed with a weekly 48-hour infusion of 5-FU alone at a dose of 3.5 g/m². Cancer 1995; 76:559–63.     

Randomised phase 2 trial of SIR-Spheres plus fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy versus fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy alone in advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with SIR-Spheres(R) is a new technique for selectively targeting high doses of radiation to tumours within the liver. The primary objectives of this randomised trial were to compare the response rate, time to progressive disease (PD), and toxicity of a regimen of systemic fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy versus the same chemotherapy plus a single administration of SIR-Spheres in patients with advanced colorectal liver metastases. The trial was designed to presage a larger trial that would have survival as the primary outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal liver metastases, with or without extrahepatic metastases, were randomised into the study. RESULTS: Using RECIST criteria, the response rate for 11 patients receiving the combination treatment was significantly greater than for 10 patients receiving chemotherapy alone (First Integrated Response; 10 PR, 1 SD vs. 0 PR, 6 SD, 4 PD, P < 0.001 and Best Confirmed Response; 8 PR, 3 SD vs. 0 PR, 6 SD, 4 PD P < 0.001). The time to PD was greater for patients receiving the combination treatment (18.6 months vs. 3.6 months, P < 0.0005). Median survival was significantly longer for patients receiving the combination treatment (29.4 months vs. 12.8 months, P = 0.02). One patient in the combination arm died from chemotherapy induced neutropenic sepsis after the fourth chemotherapy cycle. There were more Grade 3 and 4 toxicity events in patients receiving the combination treatment. There was no difference in quality-of-life over a 3 month period between the two treatments when rated by patients (P = 0.96) or physicians (P = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: This small phase 2 randomised trial demonstrated that the addition of a single administration of SIR-Spheres to a regimen of systemic fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy significantly increased both treatment related response, time to PD, and survival with acceptable toxicity. The combination of SIR-Spheres plus systemic chemotherapy is now the subject of ongoing trials to further define patient benefit.     

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of bolus plus infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin compared with fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin as third-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The addition of oxaliplatin to fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) improves the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This multicenter study evaluated FU/LV with or without oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic CRC after disease progression on sequential fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fourteen patients were randomly assigned to receive LV 200 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) and FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, followed by FU 600 mg/m2 IV over 22 hours on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks (LV5FU2); or LV and FU as described, plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours on day 1 of the schedule (FOLFOX4). The primary end point was overall response. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in the two treatment arms. Objective response (complete + partial) rates for LV5FU2 versus FOLFOX4 were 2% v 13% (P = .0027), respectively. Median time to disease progression was 2.4 v 4.8 months (P < .0001), and median survival was 11.4 v 9.9 months (P = .20) for LV5FU2 and FOLFOX4, respectively. Among the 72 patients who crossed over from LV5FU2 to FOLFOX4, 6% responded. Symptomatic improvement was significantly better for patients in the FOLFOX4 arm (32% v 18% for LV5FU2, P = .05). Grade 3/4 toxicities for LV5FU2 and FOLFOX4 were neutropenia (13% and 42%, respectively), diarrhea (6% and 16%, respectively), and overall neuropathy (0% and 6%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with metastatic CRC, the FOLFOX4 regimen was superior to LV5FU2 with a higher response rate and time to disease progression. FOLFOX4 is an effective regimen even after disease progression on two previous chemotherapy regimens with fluoropyrimidines and irinotecan.     

Gemcitabine plus epirubicin in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II multicenter trial

The aim of this phase II multicenter trial was to evaluate the activity of a novel combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and epirubicin (EPI) in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. Clinical benefit and response rate were the main efficacy end-points. From December 1997 to October 1999, 30 consecutive patients with measurable advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously in 30 min at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 followed by i.v. injection of epirubicin 25 mg/m(2); treatment was repeated every 28 days. With regard to clinical benefit response, 8/21 patients (38%) experienced significant palliation of tumor-related symptoms; the median symptom control time was 25 weeks. No complete responses were recorded while 6 patients achieved a partial remission, for an overall response rate of 20%; 10 patients (30%) had a stable disease and 14 (46%) had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 14 weeks. Median survival was 26 weeks, with 6 patients (20%) having long-term survival at 46 weeks. In general, chemotherapy was well tolerated; 9 patients (30%) suffered from WHO grade 3-4 haematological toxicity and 5 patients (16.6%) suffered from grade 3 non-haematological toxicity. In conclusion, the GEM plus EPI regimen represent a feasible approach for improvement of clinical benefit in advanced pancreatic cancer patients, but confirmatory investigations are required.     

Triplet combination with irinotecan plus oxaliplatin plus continuous-infusion fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) plus fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (de Gramont regimen) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with MCC who had not received prior therapy for metastatic disease were enrolled. Their median age was 60 years; performance status (World Health Organization) was 0 in 12, 1 in 14, and 2 in five patients; 19 patients (61%) had prior surgery, and 14 (45%) had adjuvant chemotherapy. CPT-11 was administered on day 1 at 150 mg/m(2) as a 90-minute intravenous (IV) infusion; L-OHP was administered on day 2 at 65 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour IV infusion; and on days 2 and 3, LV 200 mg/m(2) preceded 5-FU administration of 400 mg/m(2)/d initial IV bolus dose followed by 600 mg/m(2)/d 22-hour IV continuous infusion. The regimen was repeated every 2 weeks. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for toxicity and 30 for response to treatment. Complete response was achieved in two patients (6.5%) and partial response in 16 (51.6%) (overall response rate, 58.1%; 95% confidence interval, 40.7% to 75.4%); eight patients (25.8%) had stable disease, and five (16.1%) had disease progression. The median duration of response was 9 months, and the median time to disease progression was 13 months. Neutropenia grade 3 to 4 occurred in 14 patients (45%) and febrile neutropenia in two (6%). Diarrhea grade 3 to 4 was observed in 10 patients (32%), neurotoxicity grade 3 to 4 in three (9%), and asthenia grade 3 in two (10%). No treatment-related death has occurred. CONCLUSION: The triplet combination of 5-FU/LV + CPT-11 + L-OHP is a highly active regimen with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in MCC.     

5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid with or without ifosfamide in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II randomized trial

AIM: This phase II trial evaluated the biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus folinic acid (FA) with or without ifosfamide (IFO) in chemotherapy-naive patients with colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients were randomized to receive: FA (25 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3), followed by 5-FU (750 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3), arm A; or FA (25 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3), followed by 5-FU (750 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3) plus IFO (2,000 mg/m2 in 1000 mL 5% dextrose in a 2-hr infusion, days 1 to 3), arm B. Mesna was added during and after IFO to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis. Treatment was repeated every 21 days in both arms. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were assessable for response: in arm A, 5 patients achieved a partial response (overall response, 25%), and in arm B, 2 patients achieved a complete and 1 a partial response (overall response, 12%). Time to failure was 3.5 months (range, 1-38) in patients treated with 5-FU plus FA, and 3 months (range, 1-21) in patients treated with the IFO combination. The median survival time was 13.5 months (range, 1-49 months) in arm A and 16 months (range, 1-43 months) in arm B. Diarrhea, stomatitis and vomiting were the most common nonhematologic toxicities in both arms. The most notable hematologic toxicity was leukopenia; 15% and 20% of patients experienced grade 4 in arm A and arm B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IFO does not increase the activity of the 5-FU plus FA combination in advanced colorectal cancer.     

Oxaliplatin plus high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in pretreated advanced breast cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-h infusion on day 1, LV 200 mg/m(2)/day as a 2-h infusion followed by bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2)/day and a 22-h infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)/day for 2 consecutive days. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for response every two cycles. RESULTS: The median age was 51 years (range 34-75). Twenty patients (40%) had received three or more chemotherapeutic regimens, 64% had three or four metastatic sites and 78% had visceral metastases. All patients had prior exposure to anthracyclines and taxanes. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, one patient (2%) achieved a complete response and 16 (32%) a partial response, for a 34% overall response rate. Twenty-one patients (42%) had stable disease and 12 (24%) progressive disease. The median time to tumor progression was 5.3 months (range 0.5-12.8) and the median overall survival was 12.3 months (range 0.5-19.2). Toxicity was mild to moderate. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 32% and 18%, respectively. Febrile neutropenia was experienced by three patients (6%), who were successfully treated. Grade 3/4 neurotoxicity was reported in 14% of the patients and gradually declined after treatment discontinuation. Cycle delays were reported in 28% of patients and dose reductions in 26%. Alopecia, nausea-vomiting, diarrhea and mucositis were not significant. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: The combination of oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV seems to be an active regimen in patients with MBC and prior exposure to anthracyclines and taxanes with a good safety profile. The incidence of severe toxicity was quite low and the compliance of patients to the treatment was satisfactory. The results obtained with this regimen could be considered encouraging in this heavily pretreated group of breast cancer patients with a high incidence of visceral metastases.     

Phase II trial of uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: A University of Chicago phase II consortium study

Background/objectives: Uracil and tegafur in a 4 : 1 molar concentration ratio (UFT; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT) has broad anti-tumor activity for cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract. However, there are no published data regarding the efficacy of leucovorin-modulated UFT in patients with pancreatic cancer. The objective of this trial was to determine the activity and evaluate the toxicity of UFT plus oral calcium leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Patients and methods: Fourteen patients with advanced measurable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were enrolled onto the trial. Patients received 300 mg/m²/d UFT plus 90 mg/d leucovorin administered orally in divided doses every eight hours for 28 days repeated every 35 days. Objective tumor response was evaluated after two courses of therapy.Results: Fourteen patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. No objective responses were seen. The median (range) time to progression and survival were 14 (1.6–37), and 15 (1.9–62) weeks, respectively. Toxicity was mild with severe (grade 3 or 4) hyperbilirubinemia, pain, diarrhea, transaminitis, venous thrombus, weakness, renal failure, confusion, and edema/ascites seen in three (21%), one (7%), two (14%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), and two (14%) patients, respectively.Conclusion: In the 14 patients evaluable, UFT 300 mg/m²/d plus oral leucovorin 90 mg/d administered for 28 days did not demonstrate anti-tumor activity against advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma; however, this oral regimen was well tolerated and devoid of neutropenia, significant oral mucositis or diarrhea.     

Modulation of irinotecan with cyclosporine: a phase II trial in advanced colorectal cancer

Introduction: Despite the extensive clinical experience with irinotecan, significant concerns remain regarding its toxicity. In a phase I trial, we modulated irinotecan pharmacokinetics by inhibiting biliary excretion of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, using cyclosporine. The modulation appeared to decrease the gastrointestinal toxicity of irinotecan and suggested that irinotecan activity might also be retained. Hence, we conducted this phase II trial in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) to further evaluate the toxicity and activity of irinotecan modulated with cyclosporine. Patients and Methods: Sixteen patients with 5-fluorouracil refractory CRC were treated. Cyclosporine (5 mg/kg) was administered as a 6-h infusion and irinotecan (60 mg/m²/day, 90-min infusion) was started 3 h after initiation of the Cyclosporine. Both agents were given weekly for 4 weeks, every 6 weeks. Responses were assessed every 12 weeks, and toxicity was monitored weekly. Results: Sixteen patients were evaluable for toxicity and 11 for response. There was 1 partial response (6%). Five patients had SD lasting a median of 12 weeks. Grade 3/4 diarrhea was observed in only 13% of the patients. Conclusion: Pharmacokinetic modulation of irinotecan using parenteral cyclosporine appears to decrease the incidence of diarrhea in CRC patients. Given the modest activity of irinotecan monotherapy, a larger study would be required to assess if the modulation improves the toxicity without compromising this activity. The available clinical data suggest that pharmacokinetic modulation of irinotecan should be evaluated further to define its optimal clinical utility.Two of the co-authors: Edem Agamah (owns shares of Pfizer) and Mark J. Ratain [Co-inventor on several patents (pending/issued) related to the modulation or irinotecan and/or its Pharmacogenetics] would like to declare their potential conflicts of interest.     

Irinotecan plus raltitrexed as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II study

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with raltitrexed as first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). A total of 91 previously untreated patients with advanced CRC and measurable disease were enrolled in this phase II study. The median age was 62 years (range 31-77); male/female 54/37; ECOG performance status was 0 in 50 patients (55%), one in 39 (43%) and two in two (2%). Treatment consisted of CPT-11 350 mg x m(-2) in a 30-min intravenous infusion on day 1, followed after 30 min by a 15-min infusion of raltitrexed 3 mg x m(-2). Measurements of efficacy included the following: response rate, time to disease progression and overall survival. Of the 83 evaluable patients valuable to objective response, there were five complete responses (6%) and 23 partial responses (28%), for an overall response rate of 34% (95% CI: 25.9-46.5%). In all, 36 patients (43%) had stable disease, whereas 19 (23%) had a progression. The median time to progression was 11.1 months and the median overall survival was 15.6 months. A total of 487 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered with a median of five per patient. Grade 3-4 WHO toxicities were as follows: diarrhoea in 13 patients (15%), nausea/vomiting in four (4%), transaminase increase in six (7%), stomatitis in two (2%), febrile neutropenia in three (3%), anaemia in five (6%) and asthenia in three (3%). The combination CPT-11-raltitrexed is an effective, well-tolerated and convenient regimen as front-line treatment of advanced CRC.     

Multicentre phase II study of leucovorin plus pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

The optimal administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) for colorectal cancer (CRC) has yet to be fully defined although evidence of the combination has already been established. In a multicentre phase II study, pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy (PMC), which is based on the concept that continuous intravenous 5-FU infusion can be enhanced by low-dose oral uracil/tegafur, was combined with LV and administered. Thirty-seven patients were enrolled. The objective response rate was 31.4% and the tumour stabilization rate was 85.7%. The most common toxic effects were neutropenia and hand-foot skin reactions although no life-threatening grade 3-4 toxicities were noted. Grade 3 toxicities such as neutropenia, nausea, diarrhoea and oesophagitis occurred in one patient each. We identified the usefulness of a new type of infusional 5-FU combined with LV for the treatment of CRC. The combination of PMC and LV is active with an acceptable rate of toxicity as a first-line treatment of advanced CRC.     

Gemcitabine plus celecoxib (GECO) in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II trial

Introduction: Single agent gemcitabine (GEM) is the standard treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Celecoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor. Recent studies in human pancreatic tumor cell lines suggest an involvement of COX-2 in tumor-dependent angiogenesis and provide the rational for inhibition of the COX pathway as an effective therapeutic approach. The aim of this study is to evaluate the toxicity and activity of gemcitabine plus celecoxib. Patients and methods: Forty-two consecutive patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma entered the trial. Twenty-six patients (pts) were metastatic, 16 pts had locally advanced disease. The schedule consisted of GEM 1,000 mg/m² (as a 30 min iv infusion) on days 1, 8 every 3 weeks and celecoxib 400 mg bid. Results: Four pts (9%) achieved a partial response and 26 (62%) had stable disease, gaining a total disease control in 30 pts (71% [95% CI, 58–84%]). Overall clinical benefit response was experienced by 23 pts (54.7% [95%CI, 38.6–70.1%]). Neither grade 4 neutropenia nor grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia was observed. Grade 3 neutropenia was detected in 19% of pts. Grade 3 non-hematological toxicity was as follows: hepatic toxicity 7%, nausea 2.3%. Three pts (7%) and 5 pts (12%) had respectively a minimum creatinine increase and edema. Median survival was 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.5–10.6 months). Conclusion: GEM in combination with celecoxib showed low toxicity, good clinical benefit rate and good disease control. Further clinical investigation is warranted.     

Activity and toxicity of oxaliplatin and bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in pretreated colorectal cancer patients: a phase II study

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a combination of oxaliplatin with bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients pretreated for advanced disease with various schedules including continuous fluorouracil infusion. Thirty consecutive patients with pretreated advanced CRC received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 by 2-h infusion dl, leucovorin 100 mg/m2 by 1-h infusion followed by fluorouracil 425 mg/m2 i.v. bolus from day 1 to 3 every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. The best overall response rate in an intent-to-treat analysis was 13% (2 complete responses and 2 partial responses) (95% CI, 1.2-25.5%) and 37% of patients obtained stable disease with a tumor growth control rate of 50% (95% CI, 32.1-67.9%). The median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% CI, 1.4-6.5 months) and median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.9-14.1 months). The independent prognostic factors for improved overall survival were a good performance status and a response/stabilization of disease to chemotherapy. Severe neutropenia was quite common (43.3% of patients and 14.4% of cycles), although complicated by fever only in one case (3.3% of patients). There was one toxic death. In conclusion, the study combination showed an interesting rate of tumor growth control in a cohort of patients previously treated for advanced disease with various schedules including continuous fluorouracil infusion.     

Uracil-tegafur/leucovorin and mitomycin C salvage therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II study

Abstract

We investigated the efficacy and safety of oral Uracil/tegafur (UFT) with leucovorin and mitomycin C (MMC) as third-line treatment for patients with extensively pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This was a multicenter, prospective phase II study. Patients received MMC 7 mg/m² on day 1 and UFT 300 mg/m² with leucovorin 90 mg, both divided into three daily doses, on days 1–28 every 5 weeks. All patients had failed prior treatment with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine, bevacizumab, and cetuximab. The primary endpoint was tumor control rate evaluated after 2 cycles. Twenty-one patients were included: median age was 66 years (41·1–87·8 years). Tumor control rate was observed in 26·7% of the 15 patients evaluable for response. Median overall survival was 6·4 months. Grade 3 adverse events were asthenia, anorexia, and vomiting. In patients with mCRC who have progressed after as many as two prior therapies, the combination of UFT/leucovorin and MMC is safe and may produce a short stabilization of disease in approximately 25% of patients.