The mirror antisaccade task: direction–amplitude interaction and spatial accuracy characteristics

In this study we examined the performance of human subjects in three oculomotor tasks: a visually guided saccade task (VST), a simple antisaccade task (SAT) and a mirror antisaccade task (MAT). The stimulus presentation was identical for all three tasks, and the differentiation of the tasks was based on the instruction given to the subjects. Subjects were instructed to either look at a visually presented target location (visually triggered saccade task), or to look at the opposite direction of the visually presented target (simple antisaccade task) or finally to look at the mirror location opposite to the location of the visually presented target (mirror antisaccade task). The loading of the simple antisaccade task with the addition of the amplitude requirement did not affect the percentage of directional errors but slowed down the onset of antisaccade execution by 19 ms. The amplitude of the directionally correct antisaccade in the mirror antisaccade task showed a significant distortion of the true mirror target location. This dysmetria followed the same qualitative pattern to that observed for the visually guided saccades, i.e., a near-target hypermetria together with a far-target hypometria, but both these features were exaggerated in the mirror antisaccade task. This distorted amplitude modulation of mirror antisaccade amplitude was completely lost in corrected antisaccades that followed a directional error.     

Adaptation of reactive and voluntary saccades: different patterns of adaptation revealed in the antisaccade task

Sensorimotor adaptation restores and maintains the accuracy of goal-directed movements. It remains unclear whether these adaptive mechanisms modify actions by controlling peripheral premotor stages that send commands to the effectors and/or earlier processing stages involved in registration of target location. Here, we studied the effect of adaptation of saccadic eye movements, a well-established model of sensorimotor adaptation, in an antisaccade task. This task introduces a clear spatial dissociation between the actual target direction and the requested saccade direction because the correct movement direction is in the opposite direction from the target location. We used this requirement of a vector inversion to assess the level(s) of saccadic adaptation for two different types of adapted saccades. In two different experiments, we tested the transfer to antisaccades of the adaptation in one direction of reactive saccades to jumping targets and of scanning voluntary saccades within a target array. In the first experiment, we found that adaptation of reactive saccades transferred only to antisaccades in the adapted direction. In contrast, in the second experiment, adaptation of scanning voluntary saccades transferred to antisaccades in both the adapted and non-adapted directions. We conclude that adaptation of reactive saccades acts only downstream of the vector inversion required in the antisaccade task, whereas adaptation of voluntary saccades has a distributed influence, acting both upstream and downstream of vector inversion.     

Visual versus motor vector inversions in the antisaccade task: a behavioral investigation with saccadic adaptation

In the antisaccade task, subjects must execute an eye movement away from a visual target. Correctly executing an antisaccade requires inhibiting a prosaccade toward the visual target and programming a movement to the opposite side. This movement could be based on the inversion of the visual vector, corresponding to the distance between the fixation point and the visual target, or the motor vector of the unwanted prosaccade. We dissociated the two vectors by means of saccadic adaptation. Adaptation can be observed when systematic targeting errors are caused by the displacement of the visual target during the saccade. Adaptation progressively modifies saccade amplitude (defined by the motor vector) such that it becomes appropriate to the postsaccadic stimulus position and thus different from the visual vector of the target. If antisaccade preparation depended on visual vector inversion, rightward prosaccade adaptation should not transfer to leftward antisaccades (which are based on the same visual vector) but should transfer to rightward antisaccades (which are based on a visual vector inside the adaptation field). If antisaccade preparation depended on motor vector inversion, rightward prosaccade adaptation should transfer to leftward antisaccades (which are based on the same, adapted motor vector) but should not transfer to rightward antisaccades (which are based on a nonadapted motor vector). The results are in line with the first hypothesis, showing that vector inversion precedes saccadic adaptation and suggesting that antisaccade preparation depends on the inversion of the visual target vector.     

Abnormalities of internally generated saccades in obsessive-compulsive disorder

BACKGROUND: We aimed to utilize tests of saccadic function to investigate whether cognitive abnormalities in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) arise from a dysfunction of inhibitory processes or whether they reflect a more general difficulty in guiding behaviour on the basis of an internal representation of task goal. METHODS: Twelve patients with OCD and 12 matched controls performed a visually-guided saccade task, a volitional prosaccade task and an antisaccade task. The latency and gain of saccades was compared between groups for the three saccade tasks. The number of antisaccade errors was also calculated and compared between groups. RESULTS: There was no difference for antisaccade error rates between the groups. The latency of visually guided saccades did not differ between groups, however the latency of both volitional prosaccades and antisaccades was significantly slower in the patients with OCD than in controls. The difference in latency between volitional prosacades and antisaccades, however, was equal between groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that patients with OCD have an abnormality in guiding behaviour on the basis of an internal representation of the task goal, rather than a problem with inhibiting reflexive behaviour.     

Less attention is more in the preparation of antisaccades, but not prosaccades

To make a saccadic eye movement to a target we must first attend to it. It is therefore not surprising that diverting attention increases saccade latency, but is latency increased in all cases? We show that attending to a peripheral discrimination task has a paradoxical effect. If the stimulus to be attended appears shortly (100 to 300 ms) before an eye movement is made in a direction opposite to that of a presented stimulus (an antisaccade), its latency is reduced to well below baseline performance. In contrast, latencies for saccades toward the stimulus (prosaccades) are increased under similar conditions. This paradoxical effect may arise from competition between the processes mediating prosaccades and antisaccades. When the discrimination task is presented at the critical moment, it interferes with a reflexive prosaccade, allowing faster antisaccades. The results suggest that the suppression of sensorimotor reflexes can facilitate volitional motor acts.     

The effects of illusory line motion on incongruent saccades: implications for saccadic eye movements and visual attention

A complex neural problem must be solved before a voluntary eye movement is triggered away from a stimulus (antisaccade). The location code activated by a stimulus must be internally translated into an appropriate signal to direct the eyes into the opposite visual field, while the reflexive tendency to look directly at the stimulus must be suppressed. No doubt these extra processes contribute to the ubiquitous slowing of antisaccades. However, there is no consensus on the cognitive mechanisms that contribute to the antisaccade programme. Visual attention is closely associated with the generation of saccadic eye movements and it has been shown that attention will track an illusion of line motion. A series of experiments combined this illusion with a saccadic eye movement that was congruent (i.e. directed towards), or incongruent with (i.e. direct away from), a peripheral target. Experiment 1 showed that congruent saccades had faster reaction times than incongruent saccades. In contrast, Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that, with illusory line motion, incongruent saccades now had faster reaction times than congruent saccades. These findings demonstrate that an illusory phenomenon can accelerate the processing of an incongruent relative to a congruent saccade.     

An early transient 40 Hz activity discriminates a following pro-saccade from a no-move and anti-saccade choice

We studied the oscillatory activity of the scalp-recorded EEG in healthy humans performing a task that required a particular eye-movement response choice according to the shape of a visual target. We observed a significant stimulus-aligned activity at the 40 Hz frequency band 100 ms after the appearance of the target only when that target was the end point for the subsequent eye movement (pro-saccade). This activity was most prominent over the central-parietal area of the right hemisphere. When the target indicated a movement to the opposite direction (anti-saccade) or indicated that no movement was required (no-move), this 40 Hz activity was nearly absent. This difference in activity between the pro-saccade and the other two tasks was evident in the single subject ERPs for four of the six subjects studied. In contrast, the movement-aligned 40 Hz activity for the pro-saccade and anti-saccade was almost identical. We speculate that this early stimulus-aligned 40 Hz activity might reflect a fast transformation of a visual stimulus to a motor response (eye movement) that can be performed for the pro-saccade task where stimulus-response compatibility is strong compared to the anti-saccade and no-move tasks. The movement-aligned 40 Hz activity might be related to the motor response preparation per se. We conclude that this task specific transient oscillatory activity could be used as a probe in the study of the temporal dynamics of visuomotor transformations.     

Event-related potentials associated with correct and incorrect responses in a cued antisaccade task

In an antisaccade task, subjects are instructed to inhibit a reflexive saccade towards a peripheral stimulus flash and to generate a saccade in the opposite direction. It has been shown recently that normal subjects will generate a high number of incorrect prosaccades in an antisaccade task if the fixation point is extinguished 200 ms before the stimulus appears and if a valid cue for the subsequent antisaccade is given during this gap period. In the present study we recorded cerebral event-related potentials from 19 scalp electrodes from normal subjects prior to correct and incorrect responses in a cued antisaccade task to investigate the neural processes associated with correct antisaccades and incorrect prosaccades in this task. Correct antisaccades and incorrect prosaccades were associated with a negative potential with a maximal amplitude around stimulus onset over the dorsomedial frontal cortex. This potential was higher prior to correct antisaccades than prior to incorrect prosaccades. The execution of a correct antisaccade was preceded by a shift of a negative potential from the parietal hemisphere contralateral to the visual stimulus towards the parietal hemisphere ipsilateral to the stimulus. These results support the view that the supplementary eye fields participate in the inhibition of incorrect saccades in a cued antisaccade task and show that the parietal cortex participates in generating a neural representation of the visual stimulus in the hemifield ipsilateral to the stimulus before generating a motor response. Received: 20 December 1996 / Accepted: 18 June 1997     

Electrophysiological recordings in humans reveal reduced location-specific attentional-shift activity prior to recentering saccades

Being able to effectively explore the visual world is of fundamental importance, and it has been suggested that the straight-ahead gaze position within the egocentric reference frame ("primary position") might play a special role in this context. In the present study we employed human electroencephalography (EEG) to examine neural activity related to the spatial guidance of saccadic eye movements. Moreover, we sought to investigate whether such activity would be modulated by the spatial relation of saccade direction to the primary gaze position (recentering saccades). Participants executed endogenously cued saccades between five equidistant locations along the horizontal meridian. This design allowed for the comparison of isoamplitude saccades from the same starting position that were oriented either toward the primary position (centripetal) or further away from it (centrifugal). By back-averaging time-locked to the saccade onset on each trial, we identified a parietally distributed, negative-polarity EEG deflection contralateral to the direction of the upcoming saccade. Importantly, this contralateral presaccadic negativity, which appeared to reflect the location-specific attentional guidance of the eye movement, was attenuated for recentering saccades relative to isoamplitude centrifugal saccades. This differential electrophysiological signature was paralleled by faster saccadic reaction times and was substantially more apparent when time-locking the data to the onset of the saccade rather than to the onset of the cue, suggesting a tight temporal association with saccade initiation. The diminished level of this presaccadic component for recentering saccades may reflect the preferential coding of the straight-ahead gaze position, in which both the eye-centered and head-centered reference frames are perfectly aligned and from which the visual world can be effectively explored.     

Effects of direction on saccadic performance in relation to lateral preferences

A sample of 676 healthy young males performed visually guided saccades and antisaccades and completed the Porac-Coren questionnaire measuring lateral preferences. There was no difference in mean latency between rightward versus leftward saccades or for saccades executed in the left versus right hemispace. There was also no right/left asymmetry for individuals with left or right dominance as assessed by the lateral preferences questionnaire. The same results were observed for the latency of antisaccades and for the error rate in the antisaccade task. Finally, we did not confirm any substantial subpopulation of individuals with idiosyncratic left/right latency asymmetries that persisted both in the saccade and antisaccade task. These results suggest that neither latency nor antisaccade error rate are good indicators of lateral preferences in these tasks. Other oculomotor tasks might be more sensitive to hemifield differences, or cerebral hemispheric asymmetry is not present at the level of cortical organization of saccades and antisaccades.     

Saccadic instabilities and voluntary saccadic behaviour

Primary gaze fixation is never perfectly stable but can be interrupted by involuntary, conjugate saccadic intrusions (SI). SI have a high prevalence in the normal population and are characterised by a horizontal fast eye movement away from the desired eye position, followed, after a variable duration, by a return saccade or drift. Amplitudes are usually below 1° and they often exhibit a directional bias. The aim of the present study was to investigate the aetiology of SI in relation to saccadic behaviour. It was hypothesised that if SI resulted from deficits in the saccadic system (i.e. reduced inhibitory mechanisms), changes in voluntary saccade behaviour may be apparent and related to SI frequency. To examine this, synchrony (no gap), gap, overlap and antisaccade tasks were conducted on ten normal subjects. No significant correlations were found between SI frequency and voluntary saccade latencies, the percentage of express saccades, or the percentage of antisaccade errors. In addition, no significant correlations were found between SI directional biases and saccade latency directional biases, express saccade biases or antisaccade error biases. These results suggest that an underlying alteration to saccadic behaviour is unlikely to be involved in SI production, and that the SI command signal may arise from the influence of attention on an intact saccadic system. Specifically, descending corticofugal signals relating to attention level and orientation may alter the balance between fixation and saccade generation, so determining SI characteristics.     

The anti-orienting phenomenon revisited: effects of gaze cues on antisaccade performance

When the eye gaze of a face is congruent with the direction of an upcoming target, saccadic eye movements of the observer towards that target are generated more quickly, in comparison with eye gaze incongruent with the direction of the target. This work examined the conflict in an antisaccade task, when eye gaze points towards the target, but the saccadic eye movement should be triggered in the opposite direction. In a gaze cueing paradigm, a central face provided an attentional gaze cue towards the target or away from the target. Participants (N = 38) generated pro- and antisaccades to peripheral targets that were congruent or incongruent with the previous gaze cue. Paradoxically, facilitatory effects of a gaze cue towards the target were observed for both the pro- and antisaccade tasks. The results are consistent with the idea that eye gaze cues are processed in the task set that is compatible with the saccade programme. Thus, in an antisaccade paradigm, participants may anti-orient with respect to the gaze cue, resulting in faster saccades on trials when the gaze cue is towards the target. The results resemble a previous observation by Fischer and Weber (Exp Brain Res 109:507–512, 1996) using low-level peripheral cues. The current study extends this finding to include central socially communicative cues.     

Early- and late-responding cells to saccadic eye movements in the cortical area V6A of macaque monkey

The cortical area V6A, located in the dorsal part of the anterior bank of the parieto-occipital sulcus, contains retino- and craniocentric visual neurones together with neurones sensitive to gaze direction and/or saccadic eye movements, somatosensory stimulation and arm movements. The aim of this work was to study the dynamic characteristics of V6A saccade-related activity. Extracellular recordings were carried out in six macaque monkeys performing a visually guided saccade task with the head restrained. The task was performed in the dark, in both the dark and light, and sometimes in the light only. The discharge of certain neurones during saccades is due to their responsiveness to visual stimuli. We used a statistical method to distinguish responses due to visual stimulation from those responsible for saccadic control. Out of 597 V6A neurones tested, 66 (11%) showed responses correlated with saccades; 26 of 66 responded also to visual stimulation and 31 of 66 did not; the remaining 9 were not visually tested. We calculated the response latency to saccade onset and its inter-trial variance in 24 of 66 neurones. Saccade neurones could respond before, during or after the saccade. Neurones responding before saccade-onset or during saccades had much higher latency variance than neurones responding after saccades. The early-responding cells had a mean latency (±SD) of –64±62 ms, while the late-responding cells a mean latency of +89±20 ms. The responses to saccadic eye movements were directionally sensitive and varied with the amplitude of the saccade. Responses of late-responding cells disappeared in complete darkness. We suggest that the activity of early-responding cells represents the intended saccadic eye movement or the shift of attention towards another part of the visual space, whereas that of late-responding cells is a visual response due to retinal stimulation during saccades. Electronic Publication     

Switch performance in peripherally and centrally triggered saccades

A common hypothesis is that the switch cost measured when switching between prosaccades and antisaccades mainly reflects the inhibition of the saccadic system after the execution of an antisaccade, which requires the inhibition of a gaze response. The present study further tested this hypothesis by comparing switch performance between peripherally triggered saccades and centrally triggered saccades with the latter type of saccades not requiring inhibition of a gaze response. For peripherally triggered saccades, a switch cost was present for prosaccades but not for antisaccades. For centrally triggered saccades, a switch cost was present both for prosaccades and for antisaccades. The difference between both saccade tasks further supports the hypothesis that the switch performance observed for peripherally triggered saccades is related to the inhibition of a gaze response that is required when executing a peripherally triggered antisaccade and the persisting inhibition in the saccadic system this entails. Furthermore, the switch costs observed for centrally triggered saccades indicate that more general processes besides the persisting inhibition in the saccadic system, such as reconfiguration and interference control, also contribute to the switch performance in saccades.     

Eye movement disorders after frontal eye field lesions in humans

Eye movements were recorded electro-oculographically in three patients with a small ischemic lesion affecting the left frontal eye field (FEF) and in 12 control subjects. Reflexive visually guided saccades (gap and overlap tasks), antisaccades, predictive saccades, memory-guided saccades, smooth pursuit and optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) were studied in the three patients. Staircase saccades and double step saccades were also studied in one of the three patients. For both leftward and rightward saccades, latency in the overlap task (but not in the gap task) and that of correct antisaccades and of memory-guided saccades was significantly increased, compared with the results of controls. There was a significant decrease in the amplitude gain of all rightward saccades programmed using retinotopic coordinates (gap and overlap tasks, predictive and memory-guided saccades), whereas the amplitude gain of corresponding leftward saccades was preserved. Such an asymmetry between leftward and rightward saccades was significant. In the staircase paradigm as well as for the first saccade in the double step paradigm (with the use of retinotopic coordinates in both cases), the amplitude gain of rightward saccades was also significantly lower than that of leftward saccades. Moreover, in the double step paradigm, the amplitude gain of the first rightward saccade was significantly lower than that of the second rightward saccade (programmed using extraretinal signals), which was preserved. The percentage of errors in the antisaccade task did not differ significantly from that of normal subjects. In the predictive saccade paradigm, the percentage of predictive rightward saccades was significantly decreased. The left smooth pursuit gain for all tested velocities, the right smooth pursuit gain for higher velocities, and the left OKN gain were significantly decreased. The results show, for the first time in humans, that the FEF plays an important role in (1) the disengagement from central fixation, (2) the control of contralateral saccades programmed using retinotopic coordinates, (3) saccade prediction and (4) the control of smooth pursuit and OKN, mainly ipsilaterally. In contrast, the left FEF did not appear to be crucial for the control of the only type of saccades programmed using extraretinal signals studied here.     

Event-related fMRI responses in the human frontal eye fields in a randomized pro- and antisaccade task

We examined whether the frontal eye fields (FEF) are involved in the suppression of reflexive saccades. Simultaneous recording of horizontal eye movements and functional magnetic resonance imaging enabled us to perform a randomized pro- and antisaccade task and to sort blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) time series on the basis of task performance. Saccadic reaction time distributions were comparable across tasks indicating a similar effort in preprocessing of the saccades. Furthermore, we found similar BOLD activation in FEF during both correctly performed pro- and antisaccades. Frontal eye field activation started prior to target presentation and saccade generation. While we observed only few erroneous antisaccades, these were associated with a decrease in BOLD activity prior to target presentation, and increased BOLD activity after target presentation relative to correctly performed antisaccades. These findings are consistent with a role of the FEF in the suppression of reflexive saccades. The increase in activity after target presentation for antisaccade errors can only be indirectly linked to such a role but may also reflect activity related to the generation of a correction saccade. Frontal eye field BOLD activity may further represent general arousal, preparatory set, short-term memory, or salience-map related activity.     

Reaction times of vertical prosaccades and antisaccades in gap and overlap tasks

Horizontal saccadic reaction times (SRTs) have been extensively studied over the past 3 decades, concentrating on such topics as the gap effect, express saccades, training effects, and the role of fixation and attention. This study investigates some of these topics with regard to vertical saccades. The reaction times of vertical saccades of 13 subjects were measured using the gap and the overlap paradigms in the prosaccade task (saccade to the stimulus) and the antisaccade task (saccade in the direction opposite to the stimulus). In the gap paradigm, the initial fixation point (FP) was extinguished 200 ms before stimulus onset, while, in the overlap paradigm, the FP remained on during stimulus presentation. With the prosaccade overlap task, it was found that most subjects (10/13) — whether they were previously trained making horizontal saccades or naive — had significantly faster upward saccades compared with their downward saccades. One subject was faster in the downward direction and two were symmetrical. The introduction of the gap reduced the reaction times of the prosaccades, and express saccades were obtained in some naive and most trained subjects. This gap effect was larger for saccades made to the downward target. The strength of the updown asymmetry was more pronounced in the overlap as compared to the gap paradigm. With the antisaccade task, up-down asymmetries were much reduced. Express antisaccades were absent even with the gap paradigm, but reaction times were reduced as compared to the antisaccade overlap paradigm. There was a slight tendency for a larger gap effect of downward saccades. All subjects produced a certain number of erratic prosaccades in the antitaks, more with the gap than with the overlap paradigm. There was a significantly larger gap effect for the erratic prosaccades made to the downward, as compared to the upward, target, due to increased downward SRTs in the overlap paradigm. Three subjects trained in both the horizontal and the vertical direction showed faster SRTs and more express saccades in the horizontal directions as compared to the vertical. It is concluded that different parts of the visual field are differently organized with both directional and nondirectional components in saccade preparation.     

Peak velocities of visually and nonvisually guided saccades in smooth-pursuit and saccadic tasks

 Smooth pursuit typically includes corrective catch-up saccades, but may also include such intrusive saccades away from the target as anticipatory or large overshooting saccades. We sought to differentiate catch-up from anticipatory and overshooting saccades by their peak velocities, to see whether the higher velocities of visually rather than nonvisually guided saccades in saccadic tasks may be found also in saccades in pursuit. In experiment 1, 12 subjects showed catch-up, anticipatory, and overshooting saccades to comprise 70.4% of all saccades in pursuit of periodic, 30°/s constant-velocity targets. Catch-up saccades were faster than the others. Saccadic tasks were run as well, on 19 subjects, including the 12 whose pursuit data were analyzed, with target-onset, target-remaining (saccade to the remaining target when the other three extinguish), and antisaccade tasks. For 17 of the 19 subjects, antisaccade velocities were lower than for either target-onset or target-remaining tasks. Velocities for the target-remaining task were near those for target onset, indicating that target presence, not its onset, defines visually guided saccades. Error and reaction-time data suggest greater cognitive difficulty for target remaining than for target onset, so that the cognitive difficulty of typical nonvisually guided saccade tasks is not sufficient to produce their lowered velocity. To produce reliably, in each subject, catch-up and anticipatory saccades with comparable amplitude distributions, nine new subjects were asked in experiment 2 to make intentional catch-up and anticipatory saccades in pursuit, and were presented with embedded target jumps to elicit catch-up saccades, all with periodic target trajectories of 15°/s and 30°/s. Velocities of intentional anticipatory saccades were lower than velocities of intentional catch-up saccades, while velocities of intentional and embedded catch-up saccades were similar. Target-onset and remembered-target saccadic tasks were run, showing the expected higher velocity for the target-onset task in each subject. Both experiments demonstrate higher peak velocities for catch-up saccades than for anticipatory saccades, suggesting that cortical structures preferentially involved in nonvisually guided saccades may initiate the anticipatory and overshooting saccades in pursuit. Received: 1 December 1995 / Accepted: 25 February 1997     

Verbal instructions and top-down saccade control

Few studies have addressed the interaction between instruction content and saccadic eye movement control. To assess the impact of instructions on top-down control, we instructed 20 healthy volunteers to deliberately delay saccade triggering, to make inaccurate saccades or to redirect saccades—i.e. to glimpse towards and then immediately opposite to the target. Regular pro- and antisaccade tasks were used for comparison. Bottom-up visual input remained unchanged and was a gap paradigm for all instructions. In the inaccuracy and delay tasks, both latencies and accuracies were detrimentally impaired by either type of instruction and the variability of latency and accuracy was increased. The intersaccadic interval (ISI) required to correct erroneous antisaccades was shorter than the ISI for instructed direction changes in the redirection task. The word-by-word instruction content interferes with top-down saccade control. Top-down control is a time consuming process, which may override bottom-up processing only during a limited time period. It is questionable whether parallel processing is possible in top-down control, since the long ISI for instructed direction changes suggests sequential planning.     

EEG activity related to preparation and suppression of eye movements in three-dimensional space

Eight normal subjects made visually guided eye movements to four LED targets placed at two different distances (20 and 70 cm) and on either side (±10°) at 70 cm. Four types of eye movements were elicited: pure saccades, convergence, divergence, and combined (divergent saccades). EEG activity was recorded from 62 electrodes and was aligned to stimulus onset. A negativity peaked after 140 ms and was modulated according to the location of the stimulus in space and the type of movement prepared, mainly in central and posterior cortex. For saccade targets, we confirmed a stimulus-related negativity in the posterior and central cortical area, contralateral to target direction. For convergence and divergence targets, this negativity was bilaterally distributed; convergence targets activated a rather extended cortical network in the central and posterior area, while divergence targets activated a more confined posterior area, spreading ventrally from the occipital cortex. Cortical activity for combined targets was lateralised contralaterally to stimulus direction but its topography resembled more closely that after the divergence stimulus. When observers suppressed the relevant eye movement to the stimulus, EEG activity was enhanced on the right hemisphere, showing the more pronounced effect on the right occipital-temporal and central-parietal electrode sites.