Water-deprivation prevents morphine-, but not LiCl-induced, suppression of sucrose intake.

Intake of a saccharin-conditioned stimulus (CS) can be suppressed following pairing with an aversive agent such as lithium chloride (LiCl) or x-rays (referred to as a conditioned taste aversion or CTA), a highly rewarding sucrose solution (referred to as an anticipatory contrast effect), or a drug of abuse such as morphine or cocaine. Although the suppressive effects of LiCl and sucrose are clear examples of aversive and appetitive conditioning, respectively, it is not certain which properties (aversive or appetitive) mediate the suppressive effects of drugs of abuse. It is known, however, that the suppressive effects of a rewarding sucrose US are attenuated when using a caloric sucrose CS in food deprived rats, while LiCl induced CTAs are much less effected. Standard CTA testing typically is conducted in water-deprived rather than food-deprived rats and, although LiCl is known to suppress intake of a sucrose CS in water-deprived rats, the suppressive effects of drugs of abuse have not been evaluated under these conditions. The present experiment, then, compared the suppressive effects of a standard dose of morphine (15 mg/kg) and a matched dose of LiCl (0.009 M) on intake of a sucrose CS in water-deprived and free-feeding rats. The results showed that both drugs suppressed intake in free-feeding subjects, but only the aversive agent, LiCl, reduced CS intake in the water-deprived rats. This finding dissociates the suppressive effects of morphine and LiCl and, in so doing, aligns the suppressive effects of morphine with those of an appetitive sucrose US.     

The suppressive effects of sucrose and cocaine, but not lithium chloride, are greater in Lewis than in Fischer rats: evidence for the reward comparison hypothesis

Rats suppress intake of a saccharin conditioned stimulus (CS) when it is paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US), an appetitive US, or a drug of abuse such as morphine or cocaine. It is unclear, however, whether the reduction in intake induced by these drugs is mediated by their aversive or their rewarding properties. The present set of experiments addressed this question by comparing the suppressive effects of a known aversive US (LiCl), a known reinforcing US (sucrose), and a drug of abuse (cocaine) in two strains of rats (i.e., Lewis and Fischer 344 rats) that differ in their preference for rewarding stimuli. The results show that, although both strains readily acquired a LiCl-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA), the suppressive effects of sucrose and cocaine were robust in the drug-preferring Lewis rats and absent in the Fischer rats. These data argue against a CTA account and in favor of the reward comparison hypothesis.     

Gustatory insular cortex lesions disrupt drug-induced, but not lithium chloride-induced, suppression of conditioned stimulus intake

Rats suppress intake of a normally preferred 0.15% saccharin conditioned stimulus (CS) when it is paired with an aversive agent like lithium chloride (LiCl) or a preferred substance such as sucrose or a drug of abuse. The reward comparison hypothesis suggests that rats avoid intake of a saccharin cue following pairings with a drug of abuse because the rats are anticipating the availability of the rewarding properties of the drug. The present study used bilateral ibotenic acid lesions to examine the role of the gustatory cortex in the suppression of CS intake induced by cocaine, morphine, and LiCl. The results show that bilateral lesions of the insular gustatory cortex (1) fully prevent the suppressive effects of both a 15 and a 30 mg/kg dose of morphine, (2) attenuate the suppressive effect of a 10 mg/kg dose of cocaine, but (3) are overridden by a 20 mg/kg dose of the drug. Finally, these same cortical lesions had no impact on LiCl-induced conditioned taste aversion. The current data show that the insular taste cortex plays an integral role in drug-induced avoidance of a gustatory CS.     

Chronic morphine treatment exaggerates the suppressive effects of sucrose and cocaine, but not lithium chloride, on saccharin intake in Sprague-Dawley rats

Three experiments examined the effect of chronic morphine treatment on cocaine-, sucrose-, and lithium chloride (LiCl)-induced suppression of saccharin intake in Sprague-Dawley rats. All rats were either water- or food-deprived and then implanted subcutaneously with 1 morphine (75 mg) or vehicle pellet for 5 days. They were then given brief access to 0.15% saccharin and soon thereafter injected with either cocaine (10 mg/kg s.c.), LiCl (0.009 M, 1.33 ml/100 g body weight i.p.), or saline, or, in Experiment 2, given a 2nd access period to either a preferred 1.0 M sucrose solution or the same 0.15% saccharin solution. There was 1 taste-drug or taste-taste pairing per day for a number of days. The results showed that a history of chronic morphine treatment exaggerated the suppressive effects of a rewarding sucrose solution and cocaine but not those of the aversive agent, LiCl. These data provide further support for the reward comparison hypothesis.     

A comparison between taste avoidance and conditioned disgust reactions induced by ethanol and lithium chloride in preweanling rats

Adult rats display taste avoidance and disgust reactions when stimulated with gustatory stimuli previously paired with aversive agents such as lithium chloride (LiCl). By the second postnatal week of life, preweanling rats also display specific behaviors in response to a tastant conditioned stimulus (CS) that predicts LiCl‐induced malaise. The present study compared conditioned disgust reactions induced by LiCl or ethanol (EtOH) in preweanling rats. In Experiment 1 we determined doses of ethanol and LiCl that exert similar levels of conditioned taste avoidance. After having equated drug dosage in terms of conditioned taste avoidance, 13‐day‐old rats were given a single pairing of a novel taste (saccharin) and either LiCl or ethanol (2.5 g/kg; Experiment 2). Saccharin intake and emission of disgust reactions were assessed 24 and 48 hr after training. Pups given paired presentations of saccharin and the aversive agents (ethanol or LiCl) consumed less saccharin during the first testing day than controls. These pups also showed more aversive behavioral reactions to the gustatory CS than controls. Specifically, increased amounts of grooming, general activity, head shaking, and wall climbing as well as reduced mouthing were observed in response to the CS. Conditioned aversive reactions but not taste avoidance were still evident on the second testing day. In conclusion, a taste CS paired with postabsorptive effects of EtOH and LiCl elicited a similar pattern of conditioned rejection reactions in preweanling rats. These results suggest that similar mechanisms may be underlying CTAs induced by LiCl and a relatively high EtOH dose. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 52: 545–557, 2010.     

Bilateral lesions of the thalamic trigeminal orosensory area dissociate natural from drug reward in contrast paradigms

Substance abuse and addiction are associated with an apparent devaluation of, and inattention to, natural rewards. This consequence of addiction can be modeled using a reward comparison paradigm where rats avoid intake of a palatable taste cue that comes to predict access to a drug of abuse. Evidence suggests rats avoid intake following such pairings, at least in part, because the taste cue pales in comparison to the highly rewarding drug expected in the near future. In accordance, lesions of the gustatory thalamus or cortex eliminate avoidance of a taste cue when paired with either a drug of abuse or a rewarding sucrose solution, but not when paired with the aversive agent, LiCl. The present study used bilateral ibotenic acid lesions to evaluate the role of a neighboring thalamic structure, the trigeminal orosensory area (TOA), in avoidance of a gustatory cue when paired with sucrose (experiment 1), morphine (experiment 2), cocaine (experiment 3), or LiCl (experiment 4). The results show that the TOA lesion disrupts, but does not eliminate avoidance of a taste cue that predicts access to a preferred sucrose solution and leaves intact the development of a LiCl-induced conditioned taste aversion. The lesion does, however, eliminate the suppression of intake of a taste cue when paired with experimenter-administered morphine or cocaine using our standard parameters. As such, this is the first manipulation found to dissociate avoidance of a taste cue when mediated by a sweet or by a drug of abuse.     

Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: II. Aversive and rewarding unconditioned stimuli

Drugs of abuse are known to reduce intake of a taste conditioned stimulus (conditional stimulus, CS), a behavioral response sometimes seen as paradoxical because the same drugs also serve as rewards in other behavioral procedures. In the present study we compared patterns of intake and palatability (assessed using microstructural analysis of licking) for a standard saccharin CS paired with the following: lithium chloride, morphine, amphetamine, or sucrose. We found that morphine and amphetamine, like lithium-induced illness, each suppressed CS intake and caused a reduction in saccharin palatability. Sucrose, a rewarding stimulus, did not reduce the palatability of the saccharin CS. We interpret these finds as evidence that drugs of abuse induce conditioned taste aversions.     

Estrogen-induced suppression of intake is not mediated by taste aversion in female rats

Estrogen treatment can suppress the intake of a previously presented gustatory conditioned stimulus (CS). This finding has been interpreted as an estrogen-induced conditioned taste aversion. However, a distinction must be made between taste aversion and taste avoidance. In particular, tastes are only considered aversive if they elicit a stereotypic behavioral response, otherwise the reduction in intake is classified as an avoidance. Although aversive orofacial responses have been reported in male rats after taste-estrogen pairings, they have not been examined in ovariectomized female rats. The goal of the present investigation, then, was to use similar procedures to determine whether conditioned aversion also mediates the estrogen-induced reduction of intake in female rats. Animals were introduced to a novel 0.1% saccharin solution and immediately thereafter were given a subcutaneous injection of vehicle or estradiol benzoate (10 microg). Responses were assessed using a two-bottle preference test, a one-bottle acceptance test, and a taste reactivity (TR) test. The results confirmed previous reports of a reduced preference for saccharin after saccharin-estradiol pairing using the two-bottle test. The reduction in intake during the one-bottle test, however, was not accompanied by stereotypic aversive responses, such as gaping. Surprisingly, a similar reduction in intake also occurred when using a backward conditioning procedure in which estrogen was injected before, rather than after, CS access. Thus, the present results show that the suppressive effects of estrogen reflect an avoidance, rather than aversion and, moreover, that the reduced intake may be due to an unconditioned, rather than a conditioned, response.     

Haloperidol attenuates rewarding and aversively conditioned suppression of saccharin solution intake: reevaluation of the anhedonia hypothesis of dopamine blocking

The dopamine (DA) antagonist, haloperidol, affected the conditioned suppression of a saccharin solution intake (the conditioned stimulus, CS) induced by amphetamine (AMPH) and lithium chloride (LiCl) unconditioned stimuli (USs). Four experiments showed that (a) haloperidol by itself did not reduce saccharin solution intake. (b) When haloperidol was injected between the CS and the US, the conditioned suppression was attenuated; however, (c) this did not occur when haloperidol was injected after the US, indicating that haloperidol affected the perception of the US. (d) This attenuation was found with both rewarding AMPH and aversive LiCl treatments, indicating that the valence of the US was unimportant. Thus, the so-called "anhedonia response" might be due to weakening of US impact. A general salient-stimulus hypothesis was proposed, with the anhedonia hypothesis of DA blocking as its subset.     

Intake inhibition by NPY: role of appetitive ingestive behavior and aversion

Intraventricular infusion of neuropeptide Y (NPY) decreases the amount female rats ingest during intraoral infusion (consummatory behavior) of a 1-M solution of sucrose at a rate of 0.5 ml/min and simultaneously increases the number of times the rats visit a bottle filled with sucrose (appetitive behavior). In this study, we investigated if the suppression of consummatory behavior was dependent upon the increase of appetitive behavior. The shift from consummatory to appetitive ingestive behavior was attenuated by adding 3-mM quinine HCl (QHCl) to the sucrose solution in the bottle. However, the intraoral intake of the sucrose solution was still decreased in NPY-treated rats. NPY did not modify taste reactivity as measured by aversive responses during continuous intraoral infusion of sucrose or ingestive and aversive responses to brief intraoral infusion of sucrose (0, 0.3 or 1 M) or QHCl (0, 0.3 or 3 mM). NPY stimulated visits to a bottle and intake from the bottle and inhibited sexual behavior in male rats but had no effect on the sexual behavior in the absence of a bottle. The visits and the intake were suppressed, but sexual behavior was not activated by adding QHCl (3 mM) to the solution in the bottle. Obstructing appetitive ingestive behavior, therefore, does not indiscriminately facilitate consummatory behavior. Male rats showed aversive or ingestive behavior and sexual behavior simultaneously during intraoral infusion of QHCl or condensed milk. It is suggested that NPY decreases intraoral intake and increases appetitive ingestive behavior via partially separable mechanisms that are independent of taste aversion.     

Taste reactivity as a dependent measure of the rapid formation of conditioned taste aversion: a tool for the neural analysis of taste-visceral associations

Several explanations may account for deficits in the ability of animals to form taste aversions following neural manipulations. These encompass impairments in conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) processing, conditioned response (CR) measurement, and expression, memory, and taste-visceral integration. A behavioral procedure that aids in the distinction between some of these possibilities is presented. In Experiment 1, 10 rats received seven intraoral (IO) infusions of sucrose (30 s, 0.55 ml) spaced every 5 min starting immediately after the injection of 3.0 mEq/kg of lithium chloride (LiCl). Control rats (n = 12) were treated identically except that they were injected with sodium chloride (NaCl). Oromotor and somatic taste reactivity behaviors were videotaped and analyzed. Lithium-injected rats systematically decreased their ingestive taste reactivity behavior over time, whereas aversive behavior increased. Control rats maintained high and stable levels of ingestive responding and demonstrated virtually no aversive behavior over the 30-min period following sodium injection. Rats were tested several days later for the presence of a conditioned taste aversion (CTA). Rats previously injected with lithium during sucrose infusions demonstrated significantly more aversive behavior than the control group, which demonstrated none. There were no differences in the level of ingestive behavior displayed by the two groups on the CTA test. Experiment 3 revealed that when similarly treated rats were tested for a CTA while in a lithium-induced state, a difference in the ingestive behavior between the two groups was observed. In Experiment 2, naive rats were injected with either NaCl or LiCl but did not receive their first sucrose infusion until 20 min later. These rats also received sucrose infusions at 25 and 30 min postinjection. There were no differences in the taste reactivity behavior displayed by lithium- or sodium-injected rats during any of the sucrose infusions. Collectively, these findings indicate that rats dramatically change their oromotor responses to sucrose during the period following LiCl administration, provided that the infusions start immediately after injection. Furthermore, this time-related behavioral change is predominantly attributable to associative processes. This paradigm can be useful in distinguishing between neural manipulations that affect the establishment of taste-visceral associations from others that affect the animal's ability to retain such associations over the commonly employed 24-hr conditioning-test interval.     

Two novel paradigms for the simultaneous assessment of conditioned taste aversion and food intake effects of anorexic agents

The conditioned taste aversion (CTA) is routinely used to assess the aversive consequences of anorexic agents, including potential pharmacological therapies for obesity. In a typical CTA paradigm, rats briefly sampling a novel tastant (e.g., saccharin) are acutely administered with toxin (e.g., lithium chloride, LiCl). After as few as one taste-toxin pairing, rats will reliably avoid the novel tastant. This paradigm is frequently used for the assessment of possible aversive consequences of drugs that are candidates for pharmacological therapies. The degree to which the drug supports development of a CTA is interpreted as an index of its aversive properties. Difficulties with previous work include the inability to assess affects on food intake and CTA simultaneously, particularly during chronic drug administration. We report here two novel CTA paradigms for the assessment of appetitive and aversive consequences of anorexic agents, simultaneously. In the first experiment, animals receive an intraoral infusion of a novel and highly palatable tastant immediately prior to administration of increasing doses of LiCl. In the second experiment, rats were implanted intraperitoneally with osmotic minipumps that chronically delivered a low dose of LiCl for 7 days. LiCl did not affect short or long term food intake in either experiment. However, LiCl did support the development of a CTA in both paradigms. These results suggest that both the appetitive and aversive consequences of anorexic agents can be assessed simultaneously during either acute or chronic drug administration.     

Pharmacological manipulation of immune alterations induced by an aversive conditioned stimulus: evidence for a beta-adrenergic receptor-mediated Pavlovian conditioning process.

The effect of propranolol, a beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist, on the suppression of splenic mitogenic responsiveness induced by an aversive conditioned stimulus (CS) was evaluated in rats. Experiment 1 demonstrated that propranolol administration before presentation of the CS completely blocked the suppressive effect. In contrast, Experiment 2 showed that administration of propranolol during the training of the aversive CS had no effect on the suppressive effect of the CS in a subsequent test. These findings indicate that the release of catecholamines is responsible for the conditioned immune alteration of splenic lymphocytes. Taken further, these findings suggest that the learning of the conditioned immunomodulatory response to an aversive CS is a Pavlovian conditioning process that is not dependent on the performance of the conditioned response during training.     

Appetitive-aversive interactions in Pavlovian fear conditioning

The existence of value coding and salience coding neurons in the mammalian brain, including in habenula and ventral tegmental area, has sparked considerable interest in the interactions that occur between Pavlovian appetitive and aversive conditioning. Here we studied these appetitive-aversive interactions at the behavioral level by assessing the learning that occurs when a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus (conditional stimulus, CS) serves as a CS for shock in Pavlovian fear conditioning. A Pavlovian appetitive CS was retarded in the rate at which it could be transformed into a fear CS (counterconditioning), but the presence of the appetitive CS augmented fear learning to a concurrently presented neutral CS (superconditioning). Retardation of fear learning was not alleviated by manipulations designed to restore the associability of the appetitive CS before fear conditioning but was alleviated by manipulations designed to increase the aversive quality of the shock unconditioned stimulus (US). These findings are consistent with opponent interactions between the appetitive and aversive motivational systems and provide a behavioral approach for assessing the neural correlates of these appetitive-aversive interactions.     

A similar pattern of neuronal Fos activation in 10 brain regions following exposure to reward- or aversion-associated contextual cues in mice

Relapse triggered by drug-paired cues is a major obstacle for successful treatment of drug abuse. Patterns of brain activation induced by drug-paired cues have been identified in human and animal models, but lack of specificity poses a serious problem for craving or relapse interpretations. The goal of this study was to compare brain responses to contextual cues paired with a rewarding versus an aversive stimulus in a mouse model to test the hypothesis that different patterns of brain activation can be detected. Mice were trained to associate a common environmental context with an intraperitoneal injection of saline, lithium chloride or cocaine. After measuring each animal for conditioned place preference or aversion, mice were re-exposed to the context (CS+ or CS−) in absence of the reinforcer to analyze patterns of Fos expression in 10 brain regions chosen from previous literature. Levels of Fos in the cingulate cortex, paraventricular thalamic nucleus, paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, and dentate gyrus differed in CS+ versus CS− groups, but the direction of the differences was the same for both lithium chloride (LiCl) and cocaine reinforcers. In the cingulate cortex, Fos was positively correlated with degree of place preference for cocaine or aversion to LiCl whereas in the periaqueductal gray the relationship was positive for LiCl and negative for cocaine. Results confirm Fos responses to reward- or aversion-paired cues are similar but specificity is detectable. Future studies are needed to comprehensively establish neuroanatomical specificity in conditioned responses to drugs as compared to other reinforcers.     

Effects of number of pre-exposures on sucrose taste aversion in weanling rats

Weanling rats, 20 days old, received 0, 1, 2, 4, or 8 pre-exposures to 12% sucrose prior to a single pairing of sucrose with an intraperitoneal injection of lithium chloride (LiCl; 3.0 mEq of a .15Msolution) or distilled water (20 mg/kg). Testing for sucrose taste aversion with a 2-bottle-choice procedure on 9 test trials reliably showed that increasing numbers of pre-exposures to sucrose directly attenuated taste aversion effects in the LiCl-injected groups but did not appreciably affect intake performance in the distilled water-injected groups. Comparisons between the injection conditions yielded reliable evidence for sucrose taste aversion at each pre-exposure level. These results show that flavor stimulus pre-exposures reliably attenuate subsequent taste aversion in weanling rats as had previously been reported for adult rats.     

Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: II. Sucrose and corn oil conditioned aversions

In this study conditioned aversions were produced in sham feeding rats to limit postingestive feedback from the oral stimulus. All control rats learned an aversion to either 100% corn oil or 0.3 M sucrose when ingestion of these stimuli was followed by an injection of lithium chloride (LiCl). Rats with lesions of the ventroposteromedial thalamus also learned to avoid either corn oil or sucrose. After 3 trials, rats with damage to the parabrachial nuclei (PBN) learned to avoid 100% corn oil, but failed to do so when the stimulus was 0.3 M sucrose. These results support our hypothesis that the PBN is necessary to appropriately respond to a taste, but not an oil cue as a function of experience (i.e., pairings with LiCl). The results also are consistent with our results from operant tasks demonstrating that the trigeminal thalamus, the ventroposteromedial nucleus, is not required for responding to the rewarding properties of sucrose, oil, or for modifying the response to these stimuli as a function of experience.     

Pavlovian aversive and appetitive odor conditioning in humans: subjective, peripheral, and electrocortical changes

The effects of presynaptic guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate (GTPγS) on GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) were studied in cultured hippocampal neurons using whole-cell recordings. Inclusion of GTPγS (0.5–1 mM) in the presynaptic electrode reduced both the amplitude and paired-pulse depression of IPSCs, indicating that the probability of GABA-release had been reduced. Presynaptic GTPγS increased the depression of IPSCs by the GABA_B-receptor-agonist baclofen (10 μM), and the effect of baclofen was poorly reversible after washing. Stimulation of the GABAergic neuron at 80 Hz for 1 s was accompanied by tetanic depression of the IPSCs by 52±6% and was followed by post-tetanic potentiation (PTP), reaching a peak value of 71±21% and lasting about 100 s. IPSCs evoked after tetanic stimulation were depressed and PTP was absent when tetanic stimulation was applied within 3 min after starting injection of GTPγS into the presynaptic neuron. At longer times, basal release underlying a single IPSC was depressed. This affected the ratios recorded in response to tetanic stimulations such that tetanic depression was abolished, while PTP increased to 117±34%. In conclusion, GTPγS reduces the probability of GABA-release in both a use- and time-dependent manner, most likely through an inhibitory action on presynaptic Ca²⁺-influx through voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels or an interaction with small GTP-binding proteins in the nerve terminals. Electronic Publication     

Conditioned food aversion elicited by the temperature of drinking water as a conditioned stimulus in rats

It is known that taste can act as a conditioned stimulus (CS) for conditioned food aversion. In the present study, in order to examine whether or not the temperature of drinking water can be a CS, we conducted behavioral experiments in Wistar rats. The following results were obtained: (1) The rats subjected to aversive conditioning to 5 or 40 degrees C distilled water could learn to avoid these CSs, but they did not avoid any taste stimuli. (2) The rats subjected to aversive conditioning to 5 or 40 degrees C 0.1 M sucrose developed a generalized avoidance to sucrose at any temperature. (3) When rats familiarized to 25 degrees C 5 mM saccharin-Na (Sacc) were subjected to aversive conditioning to 5 or 40 degrees C Sacc, they avoided the respective CS, but they did not generalize it to any other stimuli even if having the same temperature as the CS. (4) The rats which had undergone transection of the taste nerves (chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerves) could acquire the conditioned response to the temperature of the CS. These results suggest that rats can be conditioned to temperature aversion and that the taste nerves are not needed in the formation of this conditioning.     

Taste avoidance, but not aversion, learning in rats lacking gustatory cortex.

Control rats rapidly learned to avoid drinking either a sucrose solution (Experiment 1) or a NaCl solution (Experiment 2) when the taste was paired with illness. These rats also produced aversive reactivity to each of these solutions in a taste reactivity test. Rats that lacked gustatory cortex (GC) learned to avoid drinking sucrose and NaCl, albeit at a slower rate than control rats. GC rats failed to display aversive reactivity to these tastes. The GC rats did show normal aversive reactivity to a strong quinine HCl solution during additional tests. It is suggested that the avoidance developed by GC rats did not entail a palatability shift of the conditional stimulus as it did in control rats. This altered learning strategy may account for the consistent learning deficits found in GC rats trained to avoid tastes.