Comparison of two heparin-coated extracorporeal circuits with reduced systemic anticoagulation in routine coronary artery bypass operations

OBJECTIVES: The use of heparin-coated circuits for cardiopulmonary bypass attenuates the postperfusion inflammatory response. Postoperative bleeding and the need for allogeneic blood transfusions are reduced, particularly in combination with lowered systemic anticoagulation. The two most commonly used heparin-coated systems are the Carmeda BioActive Surface (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) and the Duraflo II coating (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Bentley Laboratories Division, Irvine, Calif). The 2 surfaces are technically unequal, and previous experimental studies have demonstrated disparities in effects on the immune system and the blood cells. However, no larger comparative studies of relevant clinical end points have thus far been reported. METHODS: Over a 24-month period, all patients undergoing coronary artery bypass were prospectively randomized to one of the two heparin-coated circuits. Altogether, 1336 consecutive patients were included. The heparin dose was reduced in all cases, with an activated coagulation time of more than 250 seconds. Clinical data were consecutively collected and stored on a computer for comparative analyses. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in any demographic or operative parameters. The Duraflo II patients required less heparin to keep the target-activated clotting time, confirming the previous finding of some leakage of heparin from the surface to the circulation. Otherwise, there were no significant differences in time for ventilatory support (Duraflo II, 1.7 +/- 1.3 hours; Carmeda BioActive Surface, 1.6 +/- 1.0 hours; P =.37), amount of postoperative mediastinal drainage (Duraflo II, 665 +/- 257 mL; Carmeda BioActive Surface, 688 +/- 243 mL; P =.07), need for allogeneic blood-plasma transfusions (Duraflo II, 4.2% of the patients; Carmeda BioActive Surface, 4.4% of the patients; P =.93), or hemoglobin concentration at hospital discharge (Duraflo II, 120 +/- 13 g/L; Carmeda BioActive Surface, 119 +/- 13 g/L; P =.08). The effects on renal function and platelets were similar, as were the incidences of perioperative myocardial infarction (Duraflo II, 1.5%; Carmeda BioActive Surface, 1.5%; P =.96), stroke (Duraflo II, 1.3%; Carmeda BioActive Surface, 1.2%; P =.47), and hospital mortality (Duraflo II, 1 [0.14%] patient; Carmeda BioActive Surface, 3 [0.45%] patients; P =.31). CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in technology, complexity, and effects on biologic markers, no clinical differences were observed between the Carmeda BioActive Surface system and the Duraflo II coating after coronary artery bypass operations. The overall clinical results were favorable in both groups, confirming the safety and feasibility of routine use of heparin-coated circuits in combination with reduced systemic anticoagulation.     

Use of heparin-bonded circuits in cardiopulmonary bypass improves clinical outcome

OBJECTIVE: The use of heparin-coated surfaces in cardiopulmonary bypass has been shown to decrease the inflammatory response imposed by the contact between blood and artificial surfaces. One would expect this reaction to improve clinical outcome. However, this has been difficult to verify. This investigation is based on an aggregation of two randomized studies from our institution and highlights possible effects of heparin coating on a number of clinically oriented parameters. DESIGN: Departmental analysis of patients subjected to coronary artery bypass surgery using heparin-coated circuits. Cardiopulmonary bypass was employed using either the Carmeda or Duraflo heparin coatings compared with a control. The systemic heparin dose was reduced in the heparin-coated groups (ACT > 250 s) vs control group patients (ACT > 480 s). The effects of heparin coating related to clinical outcome were studied. RESULTS: The use of heparin-coated circuits reduced the mean length of stay in hospital from 7.8 +/- 2.5 to 7.3 +/- 1.8 days (p = 0.040) and postoperative ventilation time from 9.7 +/- 9.2 to 8.2 +/- 8.5 h (p = 0.018), blood loss 8 h post surgery from 676 +/- 385 to 540 +/- 245 ml (p = 0.001), individual perioperative change of haemoglobin loss (p = 0.001), leukocyte count (p = 0.000) and creatinine elevation (p = 0.000), proportion of patients exposed to allogenous blood transfusions 39.2 vs 23.9% (p = 0.001), postoperative coagulation disturbances 4.4 vs 0.4% (p = 0.006), postoperative deviations from the normal postoperative course 47.2 vs 36.7% (p = 0.035), neurological deviations 9.4 vs 3.9% (p = 0.021) and atrial fibrillation 26.4 vs 18.0% (p = 0.041). No effects were found with respect to perioperative platelet count, postoperative fever reaction and 5-year survival. CONCLUSION: Based on several indicators, the use of heparin coating in cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with improved clinical results.     

Neurological and general outcome in low-risk coronary artery bypass patients using heparin coated circuits.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical significance of heparin coating in cardiopulmonary bypass has previously been investigated. However, few studies have addressed the possible influence on brain function and memory disturbances. METHODS: Three hundred low-risk patients exposed to coronary bypass surgery were randomised into three groups according to type of heparin coating: Carmeda Bioactive Surface, Baxter Duraflo II and a control group. Outcome was determined from a number of clinically oriented parameters, including a detailed registry of postoperative deviations from the normal postoperative course. Brain damage was assessed through S100 release and memory tests, including a questionnaire follow-up. RESULTS: Clinical outcome was similar for all groups. Blood loss (Duraflo only), transfusion requirements and postoperative creatinine elevation were reduced in the heparin-coated groups. A lower incidence of atrial fibrillation was noted in the Duraflo group. Heparin coating did not uniformly attenuate the release of S100 or the degree of memory impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with heparin coating and a reduced dose of heparin seems to be safe. Clinical outcome and neurological injury seem not to be associated with type of heparin coating used for CPB. However, blood loss and transfusion requirements may be reduced.     

Use of Heparin-bonded Circuits in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Improves Clinical Outcome

Objective : The use of heparin-coated surfaces in cardiopulmonary bypass has been shown to decrease the inflammatory response imposed by the contact between blood and artificial surfaces. One would expect this reaction to improve clinical outcome. However, this has been difficult to verify. This investigation is based on an aggregation of two randomized studies from our institution and highlights possible effects of heparin coating on a number of clinically oriented parameters. Design : Departmental analysis of patients subjected to coronary artery bypass surgery using heparin-coated circuits. Cardiopulmonary bypass was employed using either the Carmeda or Duraflo heparin coatings compared with a control. The systemic heparin dose was reduced in the heparin-coated groups (ACT > 250 s) vs control group patients (ACT > 480 s). The effects of heparin coating related to clinical outcome were studied. Results : The use of heparin-coated circuits reduced the mean length of stay in hospital from 7.8 &#45 2.5 to 7.3 &#45 1.8 days ( p = 0.040) and postoperative ventilation time from 9.7 &#45 9.2 to 8.2 &#45 8.5 h ( p = 0.018), blood loss 8 h post surgery from 676 &#45 385 to 540 &#45 245 ml ( p = 0.001), individual perioperative change of haemoglobin loss ( p = 0.001), leukocyte count ( p = 0.000) and creatinine elevation ( p = 0.000), proportion of patients exposed to allogenous blood transfusions 39.2 vs 23.9% ( p = 0.001), postoperative coagulation disturbances 4.4 vs 0.4% ( p = 0.006), postoperative deviations from the normal postoperative course 47.2 vs 36.7% ( p = 0.035), neurological deviations 9.4 vs 3.9% ( p = 0.021) and atrial fibrillation 26.4 vs 18.0% ( p = 0.041). No effects were found with respect to perioperative platelet count, postoperative fever reaction and 5-year survival. Conclusion : Based on several indicators, the use of heparin coating in cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with improved clinical results.     

Effects of infusion of cardiotomy suction blood during extracorporeal circulation for coronary artery bypass surgery.

The effects of infusion of cardiotomy suction blood during extracorporeal circulation were evaluated in 15 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery without the use of a left ventricular vent. In Group I all cardiotomy suction blood was discarded. In Groups II and III cardiotomy suction blood was reinfused without and with Dacron wool filtration, respectively. Marked hematologic changes were noted in the pericardial samples which also were reflected in oxygenator samples obtained at the end of bypass. Although postoperative bleeding was significantly greater in patients from Group II as compared to Group I, no differences were seen in total intraoperative and postoperative transfusion requirements. No patient required reoperation for bleeding. Recirculation of larger volumes of cardiotomy suction blood potentially could contribute to bleeding problems in the immediate postoperative period.     

Biocompatibility of heparin-coated extracorporeal bypass circuits: new heparin bonded bioline system

Biocompatibility of a new type of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass equipment, the Bioline, was evaluated in coronary artery bypass surgery cases. The heparin-coated (H) group (n = 15; Quadrox Bioline oxygenator/reservior and Carmeda BioMedicus BP-80 centrifugal pump) was compared with the nonheparin-coated (N) group (n = 12; uncoated, otherwise similar oxygenator, centrifugal pump, tubing, and filter set). Both groups used full systemic heparinization. The peak values of neutrophil elastase, C3a, IL-6, and IL-8 at 2 h after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and C3a levels at the end of CPB and at 2 h after CPB were significantly reduced in the H group compared with those of the N group. However, no statistically significant intergroup differences were observed in thrombin-antithrombin complex, D-dimer, beta-thromboglobulin, or platelet factor-4. No significant differences were observed in hemostasis time, postoperative 12 h blood loss, required amount of blood transfusion, or intubation time. In conclusion, the Bioline demonstrated partially improved biocompatibility, in terms of leukocyte and complement activation, and proinflammatory cytokine production. However, it did not improve platelet activation, coagulation, or fibrinolysis cascade under full systemic heparinization. As a result, the clinical beneficial impact seemed to be the minimum.     

Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits reduce blood cell trauma. Experiments in the pig

Blood cell trauma and postoperative bleeding remain important problems in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared heparin-coated with non-coated circuits in the pig. Twenty animals were perfused for 2 h at normothermia using membrane oxygenators (Bentley Bos 50). Two groups were studied. In the non-coated group (NC, n = 11) the CPB circuits used were without a heparin coating. This group had systemic heparinization of 400 IU/kg to maintain an ACT (activated clotting time) of over 400 s during CPB. In the coated group (C, n = 9), all surfaces exposed to blood in the CPB circuits were heparin-coated. This group had the heparin dose reduced to 25% (100 IU/kg) without further administration regardless of ACT. During CPB, group C displayed shorter ACT (per definition), higher platelet count, platelet adhesion and lower fibrinolysis and haemolysis (P less than 0.05) as compared to group NC. No thromboembolic events were detected during CPB. Three animals in group NC and 4 animals in group C were weaned from CPB and protaminized. Four hours postoperatively, the leucocyte consumption was two-fold greater and blood loss about four-fold greater in group NC as compared with group C (P less than 0.05). Perfusion with heparin-coated surfaces reduces blood cell trauma. The decreased postoperative blood loss observed in group C is probably explained by the reduced dosages of heparin and protamine.     

Experimental Studies on Three Types of Heparin-Coated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits

Abstract: In cardiovascular operations, we have usually used heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits with low systemic heparinization. Three types of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits are available in Japan: 2 of the 3 have covalent heparin bonding, and the other has ionic heparin bonding. We studied these circuits in ex vivo experiments to explore which were the best in terms of biocompatibility. In this study we compared the Carmeda system (Medtronic) and the Capiox system (Terumo) with covalent heparin bonding, and the Duraflo-II (Baxter) with ionic heparin bonding, evaluating them in ex vivo experiments. They were primed with fresh human blood, and we studied and compared the platelet counts, fibrinogen, D-dimmer, beta-thioguanine (TG), thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), and C3a and C4a of each of them. Additional research will be presented in the future.     

Nonthrombogenic aortic and vena caval bypass using heparin-coated tubes

In twenty-five acute canine experiments polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubes, both uncoated and coated with tridodecylmethylammonium chloride/heparin (TDMAC/heparin) complex, were tested in thoracic aortic bypass lasting five hours and in inferior vena caval bypass lasting thirty minutes. In aortic bypass, heparin-coated tubes were almost totally nonthrombogenic in contrast to uncoated tubes which had definite thrombus formation. Smoothly tapered tubes were significantly less thrombogenic than were hybrid tubes with junctions. Tube design, especially junction-free construction, was more important than heparin coating in preventing thrombus formation. In vena caval bypass heparin-coated tubes were totally nonthrombogenic in contrast to uncoated tubes which did show thrombus formation and thrombo-embolism. The smoothly tapered TDMAC/heparin-coated shunt tubes were successfully employed in four patients during thoracic aortic aneurysmal resection.     

Coagulofibrinolysis during heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass with reduced heparinization.

BACKGROUND: We examined the safety of reduced systemic heparinization during heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass by measuring coagulofibrinolitic indices, including fibrinopeptide A, which directly reflects fibrinogenesis. METHODS: Twenty-four patients who had elective cardiac operations were perfused using a circuit coated with covalently bonded heparin. Twelve patients received 300 U/kg of heparin and the remaining 12 patients received 150 U/kg. Blood was obtained for the measurement of thrombin-antithrombin III complexes, fibrinopeptide A, plasmin-alpha 2 plasmin inhibitor complexes, and D-dimer preoperatively; after heparin administration; 10, 60, and 90 minutes after the start of bypass; after protamine administration; and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours after the end of bypass. RESULTS: Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables including postoperative bleeding were not significantly different between the two groups. Further, there were no complications in either group. No significant differences between the two groups were noted for any hematologic index at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced systemic heparinization combined with a heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit is biochemically and clinically safe but does not reduce postoperative bleeding.     

Decreased blood loss after cardiopulmonary bypass using heparin-coated circuit and 50% reduction of heparin dose.

In a randomized, double-blind study of patients undergoing elective coronary artery grafting, the effect of heparin-coated circuit combined with 50% reduction of systemic heparin bolus was investigated. Ten patients comprised group HC (heparin-coated) and ten group C (controls). The mean total doses of heparin were 172 IU/kg in group HC and 416 IU/kg in group C and the respective protamine doses were 0.96 and 3.96 mg/kg (both p < 0.001). Activated clotting times during cardiopulmonary bypass were significantly shorter in group HC, and both intra- and postoperative bleeding was significantly less than in group C (7.7 vs. 11.7 ml/kg, p = 0.036, and 6.9 vs. 9.7 ml/kg, p = 0.004). Hemoglobin loss via the drains was 22.5 g in group HC and 43.7 g in group C (p < 0.005). Hemolysis at the end of bypass was significantly greater in group C. Apart from one perioperative myocardial infarction in group HC the postoperative course was uneventful. Use of a heparin-coated circuit is concluded to permit complication-free reduction of heparin and protamine doses and to decrease both intra- and postoperative bleeding, which may favorably influence the outcome of coronary artery grafting.     

Safety of heparin-coated circuits in primates during deep hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the biologic impact of heparin-coated circuits without systemic heparinization during deep hypothermia. Baboons (n=6) were placed on a heparin-coated pediatric closed-circuit cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) system and cooled to 18 degrees C. A control group (n=7) underwent similar protocol with a non heparin-coated circuit and received systemic heparin. Either low flow at 0.5 L/min/m 2 (n=8; 4 in each group) or circulatory arrest (n=5; 2 in experimental group and 3 in control group) was used during deep hypothermia. Samples for complete blood count (CBC), hepatic and renal function tests, activated clotting time (ACT) and thrombelastogram (TEG) were obtained before, during, and after bypass. Cerebral blood flow was measured using Xenon-133 and autopsies were performed to assess end-organ damage. The ACT returned to baseline in both groups, and renal and hepatic function were within normal limits. There was no significant difference between the TEG values between the groups post bypass. Fibrin split products were absent and fibrinogen levels were normal in both groups following bypass. Cerebral blood flows were equivalent in both groups before and after bypass, although in the heparin-coated group cerebral blood flows were significantly higher during CPB. There were no brain histologic changes in the heparin-coated group and one focal cortical infarct in the control group. This study suggests that hypothermia induced a state of anticoagulation that did not result in thrombus formation or end organ dysfunction during CPB with a heparin-coated circuit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Formation of C5a during cardiopulmonary bypass: inhibition by precoating with heparin

A novel enzyme immunoassay based on direct detection of C5a by a monoclonal antibody (C17/5) specific for a neoepitope exposed in C5a/C5adesArg was used to measure in vivo and in vitro C5a formation during cardiopulmonary bypass. In vivo, we observed a significant threefold to fourfold increase in patient plasma C5a/C5adesArg levels from baseline values (5.6; 1.6 to 12.9 ng/mL) (median and range) up to 42 hours postoperatively (17.5; 6.5 to 46.0 ng/mL) when two different uncoated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits were used. Coating of the extracorporeal circuit with end-point-attached heparin completely abolished C5a formation in vitro during circulation of blood through the circuit for 120 minutes. The C5a concentration (median and range) was 3.2 (2.6 to 15.9) ng/mL at the start and 3.1 (2.7 to 15.0) ng/mL at the end of the experiment. In the uncoated setups the corresponding C5a concentrations were 10.1 (6.2 to 17.5) and 19.7 (13.1 to 24.3) ng/mL. Finally, heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits were examined in vivo. C5a levels did not increase significantly during the cardiopulmonary bypass period in the heparin-coated group in contrast to the uncoated group, but the postoperative increase in C5a levels was similar in the two groups. We conclude that heparin coating improves biocompatibility by completely abolishing C5a formation in vitro. The discrepancy between the in vitro and the in vivo findings is probably related to the complicated biological turnover of C5a.     

Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass equipment. II. Mechanisms for reduced complement activation in vivo

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to study mechanisms for reduced complement activation by heparin coating of cardiopulmonary bypass equipment in clinical heart surgery. METHODS: Adults undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to cardiopulmonary bypass with Duraflo II heparin-coated (n = 15) or uncoated (n = 14) sets (Duraflo coating surface; Baxter International, Inc, Deerfield, Ill). Blood samples were analyzed with the use of enzyme immunoassays for C1rs-C1 inhibitor complexes and the activation products Bb, C4bc, C3bc, C5a-desArg, and the terminal complement complex. Data were compared by repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: C1 was activated during bypass, and increases in C1rs-C1 inhibitor complexes were larger with heparin coating (P =.03). C4bc increased after administration of protamine, without intergroup differences (P =.69). Bb (P =.22) and C5a-desArg (P =.13) tended to increase less with heparin coating. Formation of C3bc (P =.03) and the terminal complement complex (P <.01) was significantly reduced with heparin coating. C5a-desArg increased 2-fold during bypass, whereas the terminal complement complex increased 10- to 20-fold. Maximal terminal complement complex concentrations were significantly correlated to maximal Bb and C3bc (R = 0.6, P <.001), but not to C1rs-C1 inhibitor complexes or C4bc (R < 0.05, P >.8). CONCLUSIONS: C1 activation during bypass was increased by heparin coating, but further classical pathway activation was held in check until administration of protamine. Heparin coating significantly inhibited C3bc and terminal complement complex formation. Terminal complement complex concentrations were related to alternative pathway activation and may be useful for evaluation of differences in bypass circuitry. Increases and intergroup differences in terminal complement complex concentrations were much larger than those in C5a-desArg.     

Aprotinin reduces intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in membrane oxygenator cardiopulmonary bypass.

To determine whether aprotinin can provide a significant improvement of hemostasis in cardiopulmonary bypass using a membrane oxygenator, we tested this drug in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The subjects were 80 male patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery bypass grafting. Forty patients received aprotinin and 40 patients served as placebo controls. Aprotinin (4 x 10(6) KIU) was given as a continuous infusion, starting before operation and continuing until after cardiopulmonary bypass; additionally, 2 x 10(6) KIU aprotinin was added to the pump prime. Intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, respectively two thirds and one third of the total perioperative blood loss, were both significantly reduced in the aprotinin-treated group (p less than 0.01). The total average perioperative blood loss, corrected to a hemoglobin concentration of 7 mmol/L, was 550 mL in the aprotinin-treated patients versus 900 mL in the control patients. This reduction in blood loss, furthermore, significantly decreased the amount of postoperative blood transfusions (p less than 0.05) and increased the percentage of patients who did not receive postoperative donor blood from 42% to 68%. Aprotinin increased the activated clotting time significantly during cardiopulmonary bypass, which led to a reduction in heparin usage. The improved hemostasis during operation, despite the prolonged activated clotting time, might even abolish the need for heparin conversion with protamine at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, thus allowing retransfusion through cardiotomy suction to be continued, which saves the blood that is currently lost with vacuum suction.     

Reducing hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass: a combined approach

Interventions such as heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and reduced shed blood reinfusion have shown mixed results when applied individually for limiting hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared coagulation and fibrinolytic activation during conventional CPB (control) (CTRL) using noncoated circuits, no antifibrinolytics, and open cardiotomy with a combined strategy (HAC) that used heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and closed cardiotomy. Blood samples were drawn before, during, and after CPB for primary coronary bypass grafting surgery from 9 CTRL patients and 10 HAC patients. Thrombin-antithrombin complex and fibrinopeptide A levels (markers of thrombin and fibrin generation) were reduced in the HAC versus CTRL group after 30 min of CPB (P < 0.05). Average tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) levels were significantly lower in the HAC group by 30 min on CPB (P < 0.05), resulting in preservation of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 during CPB (P < 0.05). D-Dimer, a measure of intravascular fibrin formation and removal, was reduced in the HAC group during and after CPB (P < 0.005). Overall, the combined strategy was associated with a reduction in CPB-induced increases in markers of thrombin generation, fibrin formation, tPA release, and fibrin degradation and better preservation of PAI-1. IMPLICATIONS: A combined approach during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) that uses heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and limited reinfusion of shed pericardial blood is associated with reduced activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems that typically occurs during conventional CPB.     

The influence of heparin-coated and uncoated extracorporeal circuits on blood rheology during cardiac surgery

The effect of heparin-coated perfusion circuits on blood trauma during clinical cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was studied in order to find out if traumatic changes in the blood could be minimized. Twenty-four patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were randomized prospectively to CPB with heparin-coated circuits (HCC) or non-coated circuits (NCC). The trauma to blood was assessed by measuring damage to blood cells by estimating red and white cell rheology changes. These were measured as red cell filtration rate (RFR) and white cell filtration rate (WFR) using standard microfiltration methods. Furthermore, changes in plasma hemoglobin (P-Hb), whole blood and plasma viscosity were simultaneously assessed. The RFR was significantly reduced in both groups during CPB by 10% in the HCC and 32% in the NCC groups (p less than 0.01). When comparing the HCC and NCC groups, a significant difference was first seen after 30 minutes of bypass (p less than 0.05) and increased at the end of CPB (p less than 0.01). Similar results were seen regarding WFR (15% and 36%, p less than 0.01). After 30 minutes of bypass, a significant difference was seen between HCC and NCC groups (p less than 0.05). Furthermore, a significant increase in P-Hb levels were seen during CPB in both patient groups. At the end of CPB, there was a significant difference in P-Hb levels (HCC 305+/-90 mg/L; NCC 455+/-78 mg/L, p less than 0.01) when comparing the two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Clinical Experience of Assisted Circulation with a Centrifugal Pump at Tokyo Women's Medical College

Abstract: In postpericardiotomy patients, the use of pulsatile pumps is limited in a semielective fashion to patients whose postoperative marginal hemodynamics are expected preoperatively. Since 1989, 25 patients have under-gone assisted circulation with a centrifugal pump: 15 (60%) were weaned from the pump, and 7 (28%) survived. In 1988, we heparin-coated the Bio-Pump using the Carmeda technique and developed a totally heparin-coated left heart bypass system together with heparin-coated cannulas and tubing. Four postpericardiotomy patients underwent left heart bypass with this system without heparin for 2 to 9 days. No thrombus was detected in the system. Left heart bypass with a centrifugal pump has been used as a supportive method in surgical repair of thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. To over-come intraoperative hypothermia and hypoxia, we used a small membrane oxygenator with a heat exchanger in 11 patients, and postoperative recovery dramatically improved. We also developed a preassembled percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS) system with an automatic priming function using Terumo's straight path centrifugal pump and small membrane oxygenator in cooperation with the Terumo Corporation. This system was used in a patient with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. The setup and priming took only 5 min, and 2.5-3.5 L/min of flow was obtained.     

Use of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit with low-dose heparin reduces postoperative bleeding.

Postoperative bleeding was examined in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass with a heparin-coated circuit and low-dose heparin. Out of 150 patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass for longer than 90 minutes, 74 received a standard dose (300 IU/kg) of heparin with an uncoated circuit (group C) and 76 received a low-dose (150 IU/kg) of heparin with a heparin-coated circuit (group H). The coagulation and fibrinolytic systems were investigated in 24 patients. Re-opening of the chest due to bleeding was performed in 5 patients in group C (7%), but none of the patients in group H (p=0. 03). The median of blood loss in the first 12 hours after surgery was 292 ml in group C, and 216 ml in group H (p=0.006). There were no significant differences in the peak thrombin-antithrombin complex concentration between the two groups. The plasmin-alpha 2 plasmin inhibitor complex concentrations after protamine administration were 1.9 ng/ml (median) in group C and 1.1 ng/ml in group H (p=0.002). The use of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits with low-dose heparin suppressed the activation of fibrinolysis. This may explain the reduction in postoperative bleeding.