A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Approach to Predict the Cumulative Cortisol Suppression of Inhaled Corticosteroids

The suppression of endogenous cortisol release is one of the major systemic side effects of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma. The circadian rhythm of the endogenous cortisol release and the resulting plasma concentrations as well as the release suppression during corticosteroid therapy could previously be described with an integrated PK/PD model. Based on this model, a PK/PD approach was developed to quantify and predict the cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) as a surrogate marker for the systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. The presented method was applied to predict CCS after single doses and during short-term multiple dosing of the inhaled corticosteroids flunisolide (FLU), fluticasone propionate (FP), and triamcinolone acetonide (TCA), and after oral methylprednisolone as systemic reference therapy. Drug-specific PK and PD parameters were obtained from previous single-dose studies and extrapolated to the multiple-dose situation. For single dosing, a similar CCS within the range of 16–21% was predicted for FP 250 g, FLU 500 g, and TCA 1000 g. For multiple dosing, a respective CCS of 28–33% was calculated for FLU 500 g bid, FP 250 g, bid, and TCA 1000 g bid. Higher cortisol suppression compared to these single and multiple dosing regimens of the inhaled corticosteroids was predicted after oral doses of only 1 mg and 2 mg methylprednisolone, respectively. The predictive power of the approach was evaluated by comparing the PK/PD-based simulations with data reported previously in clinical studies. The predicted CCS values were in good correlation with the clinically observed results. Hence, the presented PK/PD approach allows valid predictions of CCS for single and short-term multiple dosing of inhaled corticosteroids and facilitates comparisons between different dosing regimens and steroids.     

An interactive algorithm for the assessment of cumulative cortisol suppression during inhaled corticosteroid therapy

The objective of the study was to develop an algorithm based on a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling approach to quantify and predict cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) as a surrogate marker for the systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Two Excel spreadsheets, one for single dose and another for steady-state multiple doses of inhaled steroids, were developed for predicting CCS. Four of the commonly used inhaled steroids were chosen for the purposes of simulation: fluticasone propionate (EP), budesonide (BUD), flunisolide (FLU), and triamcinolone acetonide (TAA). Drug-specific PK and PD parameters were obtained from previous single- and multiple-dose studies. In cases in which multiple-dose data were not available, the single-dose data were extrapolated. The algorithm was designed to calculate CCS based on 5 input parameters: name of drug, dose, dosing interval, time(s) of dosing, and type of inhaler device. In addition, a generalized algorithm was set up to calculate CCS based on clearance, volume of distribution, absorption rate, protein binding, pulmonary deposition, oral bioavailability, and unbound EC₅₀ of the corticosteroid of interest. The spreadsheet allowed predictions of CCS for single doses as well as steady-state conditions. A simple method has been developed that facilitates comparisons between various drugs and dosing regimens and has the potential to significantly reduce the number of comparative clinical trials to be performed for evaluating the short-term systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroids).     

Optimized therapeutic ratio of inhaled corticosteroids using retrometabolism

During recent years, the treatment of pulmonary diseases could be significantly improved due to the introduction of modern retrometabolism-based corticosteroids with improved therapeutic ratio. It is the goal of all inhaled corticosteroids to produce long lasting therapeutic effects at the pulmonary target site and to minimize systemic side effects by rapid clearance of the absorbed drug and low oral bioavailability. The development of PK/PD models allows predictions of drug effects based on the administered dose. For example, the cumulative suppression of endogenous cortisol release (CCS) as one of the major systemic side effects of inhaled corticosteroid therapy can be described with an integrated Emax based PK/PD model. In order to assess the predictive power of this model, a study was conducted to compare the PK/PD-based predictions with CCS data obtained from actual clinical trials for flunisolide, fluticasone propionate, budesonide and triamcinolone acetonide. CCS was predicted for different single doses from different inhaler devices for each drug and a good correlation was observed. Thus, the presented PK/PD model proved to be a valid tool for predicting CCS of inhaled corticosteroids. By fully understanding the underlying mechanisms it will be possible to further improve their therapeutic index.     

Single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of therapeutically clinically equivalent doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide, given as Diskus or Turbohaler dry-powder inhalers to healthy subjects.

Direct comparisons of the pharmacokinetic (PK) and systemic pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of inhaled corticosteroids after single and multiple dosing in the same subjects are scarce. The objective of this study was to compare thePK/PDproperties of clinically equivalent, single, and multiple doses of dry-powder formulations of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP 200 and 500 microg via Diskus) and budesonide (BUD, 400 and 1,000 microg via Turbohaler). Fourteen healthy subjects completed a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, five-way crossover study consisting of a single dose administered at 8 a.m. on day 1 followed by 4 days of twice-daily dosing at 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. on days 2 to 5. Serum concentrations of FP and BUD were measured using validated liquid chromatography/ mass spectrometry assays. The 24-hour cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) in serum was monitored as the pharmacodynamic surrogate marker. Peak serum concentrations following single and multiple dosing were observed 10 to 30 minutes after inhalation for BUD and 30 to 90 minutes afterinhalation of FP with no influence of dose ordosingregimen. After a single dose of 1000 microg BUD and 500 microg FP the median estimates of terminal half-life and mean residence time were 3.5 and 3.9 hours for BUD and 10.1 and 12.0 hours for FP, respectively. Using previously reported intravenous data, the mean absorption times (MAT) were calculated to be around 2 hours and 7 hours for BUD and FP respectively. On average, the area under the curve (A UC) at steady state (day 5) was up to 30% higher for BUD compared to that over a 12-hour period following the first dose on day 1, whereas A UC estimates were 50% to 80% higherforFP at steady state, indicating accumulation. However, the steady-state Cmax values were seven to eight times and AUC values three to four times higher for BUD than for FP. Comparison of active treatment data with placebo showed that CCS after a single dose was not pronounced for any of the doses/drugs studied. On day 5, both doses of BUD caused statistically significant suppression (CCS of 19% for the 400 microg dose and 36% for the 1,000 microg dose). For FP only the high dose had a statistically significant effect on serum cortisol (CCS of 14% for the 200 microg dose and 27% for the 500 microg dose). Compared to BUD, FP has slower pulmonary absorption and slower elimination kinetics. However, following inhalation of therapeutically equipotent, multiple twice-daily doses in healthy subjects, the systemic effects of FP delivered via Diskus on AUC24 serum cortisol were relatively low and similar to those of BUD delivered via Turbohaler.     

An assessment of the systemic activity of single doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate in healthy volunteers.

1. The systemic effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP), administered via Diskhaler, on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis were assessed primarily by measuring plasma cortisol at frequent intervals for 20 h after drug administration. 2. FP showed a dose-related suppression of plasma cortisol measured as area under the plasma cortisol vs time curve (AUC 0-20). The cortisol suppression (expressed as % fall from placebo) was 8, 19, and 28% for single doses of 250 micrograms FP, 500 micrograms FP and 1000 micrograms FP, respectively. A single dose of budesonide, 800 micrograms (via Turbuhaler), resulted in a 16% cortisol suppression. The cortisol suppression for all three single doses of FP, and for the single dose of budesonide, was statistically significantly different from placebo. 3. Repeated dosing of FP (1000 micrograms twice daily for 3.5 days) resulted in a more marked plasma cortisol suppression; a fall of 65% from placebo (AUC FP 1000 mg twice daily vs AUC placebo, P < 0.001). 4. In a well-controlled study in healthy volunteers, inhaled FP, in therapeutic doses, was shown to exhibit systemic effects which appear to be more pronounced after repeated dosing.     

An assessment of the systemic effects of single and repeated doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate and inhaled budesonide in healthy volunteers

The systemic effects of single and multiple doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide were examined in 24 healthy male volunteers (age range 18–29 years). The study was of an open, placebo-controlled, randomized, three-way crossover design. On each study day, multiple blood samples were taken over a 20 h period after drug administration (after a single dose and after the last of seven doses) and area under the curve (AUC_0–20) for plasma cortisol and white blood cell (WBC) counts was calculated. Results: The present study shows that multiple dosing with FP 1.0 mg b.i.d. for 3.5 days (seven doses) resulted in a marked cortisol suppression from placebo which, at 55%, was more than double that seen with a single dose (25% suppression). Multiple dosing with budesonide 0.8 mg b.i.d. resulted in a 34% suppression in plasma cortisol compared with a suppression of 26% with a single dose. The increase in systemic activity of FP after multiple dosing is confirmed by both the number of subjects with 0800 hours plasma cortisol values below normal limits and by the changes in WBC and differential counts. Conclusion: The results of the present study confirm previous findings with regard to the more marked systemic effect of FP following multiple dosing as compared with a single dose. This increase in systemic effect from single dosing to multiple dosing is significantly greater for FP than for budesonide.     

A new solution-based intranasal triamcinolone acetonide formulation in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: how does the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile for cortisol suppression compare with an aqueous suspension-based formulation?

The present study was undertaken to describe the pharmacokinetics of a new solution-based intranasal triamcinolone acetonideformulation (Tri-Nasal) in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and to use a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) simulation approach to compare the potential effects on plasma cortisol with that of an aqueous suspension-based nasal triamcinolone acetonide formulation (Nasacort AQ). Data from an open-label, randomized, three-way crossover study in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis receiving three doses (100, 200, and 400 microg) of a nasal solution-based triamcinolone acetonide formulation (Tri-Nasal) over 7 days were used to describe the pharmacokinetics of this formulation. Available literature data for a suspension-based aqueous triamcinolone acetonide formulation (Nasacort AQ) were used to describe its pharmacokinetic profile after similar single doses of 110, 220, and 440 microg. A PK/PD simulation approach was used to predict the anticipated cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) of these two formulations. These simulations suggested a cortisol suppression of 8% to 16% for the single and steady-state doses of the solution-based product. Similar CCS estimates were predicted for equivalent doses of the aqueous suspension-based triamcinolone acetonide formulation with no difference between both formulations. Post hoc power analysis suggested that the predicted cortisol suppression is not likely to be significant for either preparation, including the clinically recommended doses of 200 and 220 microg of the solution-based and suspension-based formulations, respectively. In summary, based on the results of this PK/PD simulation, the plasma levels observed afternasal administration of the solution or the aqueous suspension are unlikely to induce a clinically relevant cortisol suppression, especially for the recommended dosing regimens of 200 and 220 microg/day.     

Pharmacokinetics and systemic effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate in healthy subjects

Aims The present study was undertaken to see whether the difference in plasma cortisol suppression between single and repeated dosing of fluticasone propionate (FP) can be explained by systemic accumulation.
Methods Twelve healthy subjects (six women) were given, in a crossover fashion, a single dose inhalation (1000  &;mgr;g) of FP via Diskhaler and repeated inhalations (1000  &;mgr;g twice daily) every 12  h during 7 days. There was a washout period of 2 weeks between the treatments. An intravenous dose of 20  μg FP was given as a reference. Plasma concentrations of FP for each treatment were determined by liquid chromatography plus tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma cortisol after the inhaled doses was determined using an immunoassay and was compared with baseline values.
Results The average plasma concentration of FP was about 1.7 times higher after multiple inhalations than after a single dose. Systemic availability, mainly attributable to pulmonary deposition, was 15.6 [13.6–18.0]% of the nominal dose. Daytime plasma cortisol suppression vs baseline was 47 [20–65]% and 95 [93–97]% for the single and repeated doses, respectively.
Conclusions To conclude, a slow elimination of FP leads to accumulation during repeated dosing. This accumulation may explain the marked decrease in plasma cortisol seen during treatment with fluticasone propionate within the clinical dose range.     

Dose equivalency evaluation of major corticosteroids: pharmacokinetics and cell trafficking and cortisol dynamics

The integrity of current corticosteroid dose equivalency tables, as assessed by mechanistic models for cell trafficking and cortisol dynamics, was investigated in this study. Single, presumably equivalent, doses of intravenous hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, and oral prednisolone were given to 5 white men, according to total body weight, in a 5-way crossover, placebo-controlled study. Pharmacodynamic (PD) response-time profiles for T helper cells, T suppressor cells, neutrophils, and adrenal suppression were evaluated by extended indirect response models. For adrenal suppression, prednisolone appears to be less potent than methylprednisolone or dexamethasone. A good correlation was found between the estimated in vivo EC50 values and relative receptor affinity (equilibrium dissociation constants normalized to dexamethasone). Area under the effect curves of all PD responses was calculated using a linear-trapezoidal method. Although T helper cell trafficking and adrenal suppression achieved significant differences by repeated-measures ANOVA (p = 0.014 and 0.022), post hoc analysis using the Bonferroni method revealed no difference between treatments. Although limited by the use of single doses and a relatively small sample size, this study applies mechanistic models for several biomarkers showing that currently used dosing tables reflect reasonable dose equivalency relationships for four corticosteroids.     

Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Systemic Corticosteroid Inhibition of Whole Blood Lymphocytes: Modeling Interoccasion Pharmacodynamic Variability

Purpose To develop a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model that characterizes the effects of major systemic corticosteroids on lymphocyte trafficking and responsiveness. Materials and Methods Single, presumably equivalent, doses of intravenous hydrocortisone (HC), dexamethasone (DEX), methylprednisolone (MPL), and oral prednisolone (PNL) were administered to five healthy male subjects in a five - way crossover, placebo - controlled study. Measurements included plasma drug and cortisol concentrations, total lymphocyte counts, and whole blood lymphocyte proliferation (WBLP). Population data analysis was performed using a Monte Carlo-Parametric Expectation Maximization algorithm. Results The final indirect, multi-component, mechanism-based model well captured the circadian rhythm exhibited in cortisol production and suppression, lymphocyte trafficking, and WBLP temporal profiles. In contrast to PK parameters, variability of drug concentrations producing 50% maximal immunosuppression (IC₅₀) were larger between subjects (73–118%). The individual log-transformed reciprocal posterior Bayesian estimates of IC₅₀ for ex vivo WBLP were highly correlated with those determined in vitro for the four drugs (r ²  = 0.928). Conclusions The immunosuppressive dynamics of the four corticosteroids was well described by the population PK/PD model with the incorporation of inter-occasion variability for several model components. This study provides improvements in modeling systemic corticosteroid effects and demonstrates greater variability of system and dynamic parameters compared to pharmacokinetics. Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Assessment of the Impact of Dosing Time on the Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Prednisolone

Prednisolone is widely used for the treatment of inflammation and auto-immune diseases. It exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics (PK); and its induced systemic effects (pharmacodynamics (PD)) are commonly evaluated with two biomarkers, cortisol and blood lymphocytes in plasma. Circadian patterns are observed in both biomarkers. Furthermore, the disease itself may show a circadian pattern. For example, in rheumatoid arthritis patients, better therapeutic outcomes have been reported when prednisolone was administered in the very early morning. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of dosing time on the PK/PD of prednisolone with a simulation approach using an interactive algorithm. A series of simulations were performed with either intravenous or oral administration of prednisolone or prednisone. The results showed that the initial or maximum concentration and trough concentration of total prednisolone were lower when the drug was administered in the early morning around 6 AM: . Oscillation patterns were observed in cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) and alteration of total lymphocyte trafficking in blood. When the drug was given in the morning within the therapeutic dose range, or around 6 PM: for a small dose amount (<1 mg), the minimum CCS and maximum effect on lymphocytes were observed. These results indicated that the PK/PD of prednisolone are time- and dose-dependent, and suggested that it is necessary to consider the application of chronotherapy to achieve better clinical outcomes with fewer side effects of prednisolone, and a PK/PD simulation approach could provide a valuable tool to evaluate and predict time-dependency in the system.     

Short-term dose-response relationships for the relative systemic effects of oral prednisolone and inhaled fluticasone in asthmatic adults

AIMS: To determine the systemic dose-response relationships with oral prednisolone and inhaled fluticasone propionate administered in a putative 11:1 mg equivalent basis, in terms of effects on adrenal, bone and haematological markers. METHODS: Twelve asthmatic patients mean (s.e.) age, 28.8 [3.3] years, FEV1 94.7 [3.6]% predicted, FEF(25-75) 65.5 [6.1]% predicted were studied in a double-blind, double dummy randomised crossover design comparing placebo, inhaled fluticasone propionate via volumatic spacer given twice a day (ex actuator dose 0.44 mg day-1, 0.88 mg day-1, 1.76 mg day-1 ) and oral prednisolone given once daily (5 mg day-1, 10 mg day-1, 20 mg day-1 ). All treatments were for 4 days at each dose level with a 7-day washout at crossover. Measurements were made at 08.00 h after the last dose of each dose level for plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin and blood eosinophil count. RESULTS: There were significant dose-related effects for suppression of all three endpoints with both prednisolone and fluticasone propionate. Parallel slope analysis revealed a calculated dose ratio for relative potency of 8. 5:1 mg (95% CI 5.7-11.2) comparing Pred with FP for morning cortisol. The magnitude of suppression with FP was less for osteocalcin and eosinophils than for cortisol. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic tissues exhibit different dose-response relationships for the effects of inhaled and oral corticosteroids with suppression of cortisol being greater than osteocalcin or eosinophils. For cortisol suppression we observed an 8.5:1 mg relative potency ratio comparing prednisolone with fluticasone propionate. Patients taking high dose inhaled fluticasone propionate should therefore be screened for evidence of impaired adrenal reserve.     

Dose–response for adrenal suppression with hydrofluoroalkane formulations of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate

AIMS: With the recent introduction of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) inhalers it is important to know the relative systemic safety profiles of inhaled corticosteroids. We therefore decided to compare systemic bioavailability of HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) vs HFA-fluticasone propionate (FP). METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers were randomised in placebo-controlled single blind cross-over fashion to receive 3 weeks with HFA-FP or HFA-BDP, given as 1 week cumulative doubling doses (nominal ex-valve) of 500, 1000 and 2000 microg day(-1), with a 1 week placebo run-in and wash-out. Overnight (22.00 h to 08.00 h) and early morning (08.00 h) urinary cortisol/creatinine excretion and 08.00 h serum cortisol were measured after each placebo and dosing period. All data were log-transformed to normalize their distribution. RESULTS: Urine and serum cortisol were suppressed by 2000 microg FP and BDP vs placebo and by 1000 microg BDP vs placebo for urinary cortisol/creatinine (P < 0.05). Overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine ratio (the primary endpoint) was suppressed more by 1000 microg BDP vs 1000 microg FP (P < 0.05), amounting to a geometric mean fold difference (95% CI) of 1.64 (1.04-2.56). There were also more individual low values less than 3 nmol mmol(-1) with BDP than FP at 1000 microg: n = 8/16 vs n = 2/16 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There was dose-related suppression of corrected urinary cortisol/creatinine with the HFA formulations of BDP and FP. Suppression of overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine ratio was significantly greater with HFA-BDP than HFA-FP at 1000 microg. This suggests that the greater glucocorticoid potency of HFA-FP may be offset by the greater lung bioavailability of HFA-BDP.     

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ciclesonide

Ciclesonide is a novel glucocorticoid that is converted into ciclesonide--active principle (CIC-AP) in the lung. The study objectives were to identify a structural model for population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of CIC-AP using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, assess the influence of select covariates on PK and/or pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, and investigate the effects of CIC-AP on endogenous cortisol. Pooled concentration data from nine phase I studies (dose: 400-3600 micrograms) involving healthy and asthmatic patients were included in the PK analysis. There were 151 subjects (3300 observations) for the CIC-AP population PK analysis. Various models examined inter- and intrasubject variability for the PK parameters. Population estimates of the PK parameters of clearance and volume of distribution were 396 L/h (64.8% co-efficient of variation [CV]) and 1190 L (41.2% CV), respectively. Pharmacodynamic population estimates included maximum cortisol release rate, 3140 ng/h (5.4% CV). The EC50 of CIC-AP was 0.88 ng/mL. Ciclesonide is a safe corticosteroid that causes negligible cortisol suppression. The disposition and effect of CIC-AP can be described using mixed-effect modeling. The estimated EC50 is similar to mean Cmax from an 800-micrograms dose, further suggesting CIC-AP has little effect on cortisol suppression.     

Pharmacokinetics and systemic effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

AIMS: We have previously shown that the systemic exposure to inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is reduced in asthmatics compared with healthy subjects. We have now compared its pharmacokinetics in patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, n = 10) and matched healthy subjects (n = 13). METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, cross-over study design was used. Plasma FP and serum cortisol were measured for 12 h after subjects received hydrofluoroalkane FP 1000 microg day-1 inhaled (via an MDI and spacer) for 7 days and following a single 1000- microg intravenous dose. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics differed in the two groups. After inhalation, geometric least square means were significantly lower in the COPD group for the plasma AUC (1961 vs 2996 pg ml-1 h-1 for COPD and controls, respectively; P = 0.03) and the Cmax (235 vs 421 pg ml-1 for COPD and controls, respectively; P = 0.03). Suppression of serum cortisol concentration over 12 h was greater in healthy controls. Weighted mean serum cortisol concentration (nmol l-1) in healthy subjects and COPD was 93 and 170, respectively (P = 0.03). The intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters for FP were comparable in the two groups, resulting in similar suppression of serum cortisol. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the altered pharmacokinetics of inhaled fluticasone propionate in COPD caused less hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal suppression than in healthy controls. This is further evidence that the systemic effects of inhaled corticosteroids should be assessed in patients and not healthy subjects.     

A comparison of methods for assessing hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity in asthma patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids

Suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is an accepted indicator of potential side effects from inhaled corticosteroids. Although cortisol monitoring is frequently used to detect changes in HPA axis activity, the optimal method for identifying the subset of asthma patients on inhaled steroids who experience severe cortisol suppression of potential clinical significance has not been established. The objective of this study was to compare several methods for assessing HPA axis activity in asthma patients taking inhaled corticosteroids. After screening, 153 patients with mild to moderate asthma were randomly assigned to receive inhaled fluticasone propionate (110, 220, 330, or 440 microg bid), flunisolide (500 microg or 1000 microg bid), or one of two control regimens (prednisone or placebo) for 21 days. Salivary (8 a.m.) and urinary (24-h) cortisol determinations were compared against 22-hour area under the serum cortisol concentration-time curve (AUC0-22 h) measured at baseline and on day 21. Comparisons were also made against 8 a.m. serum cortisol. A significant positive correlation was found between AUC0-22 h of serum cortisol and 8 a.m. serum cortisol level (r = 0.5140; p = 0.0001). The AUC0-22 h of serum cortisol was weakly correlated with 24-hour urinary cortisol levels, both corrected (r = 0.4388; p = 0.0001) and uncorrected (r = 0.3511; p = 0.0001) for creatinine excretion. The 8 a.m. salivary cortisol level correlated positively with the 8 a.m. serum cortisol level (r = 0.5460; p = 0.0001). Salivary cortisol was both sensitive and specific for the detection of a 50% decline in AUC0-22 h of serum cortisol. Cortisol reductions of this magnitude have been observed following repeated use of inhaled steroids. Because it is noninvasive, salivary cortisol measurement offers distinct advantages as a screening method for detecting pronounced HPA axis suppression in asthma patients receiving corticosteroid therapy.     

A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Approach to Predict Total Prednisolone Concentrations in Human Plasma

Prednisolone and prednisone are two widely used corticosteroids for various inflammatory and immune diseases. Prednisolone is the active form of prednisone in vivo. Total prednisolone in plasma exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics mainly due to its nonlinear protein binding. Other factors such as reversible metabolism (or interconversion between prednisolone and prednisone), competitive protein binding from endogenous cortisol, cortisol circadian rhythm, and prednisolone mediated cortisol suppression complicate prednisolone pharmacokinetics. This study was aimed to develop a new approach to describe the nonlinear pharmacokinetics of total prednisolone and predict total prednisolone concentrations in plasma. Based on literature datasets, a linear two-compartment pharmacokinetic model was developed to adequately describe the reversible metabolism between free prednisone and prednisolone. Cortisol and prednisolone protein binding were described via the sum of a Langmuir and linear type binding. The endogenous cortisol circadian rhythm and cortisol suppression during prednisone or prednisolone exposure were described with a previously reported linear release rate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. By combining the pharmacokinetic models for free prednisone and prednisolone, the linear release rate model for cortisol suppression, and competitive protein binding between cortisol and prednisolone, we were able to predict total prednisolone concentrations in plasma. The predicted total prednisolone concentrations in plasma were in good agreement with the literature reported data. Thus, this PK/PD approach shows that the combination of nonlinear protein binding, cortisol circadian rhythm, and cortisol suppression could account for the nonlinearity of total prednisolone. In addition, it also allows a valid prediction of total prednisolone in plasma after either prednisone or prednisolone administration.     

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of urinary cortisol suppression after inhalation of fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate

AIM: Fluticasone propionate (FP) and mometasone furoate (MF) are inhaled corticosteroids that possess a high ratio of topical to systemic activity. The systemic bioavailability of MF has been claimed to be minimal (1%). FP has been shown to exhibit the same degree of systemic effects, but its systemic availability is between 13 and 17%. We hypothesize that FP and MF have comparable systemic availabilities that can explain their potential to cause systemic effects. METHODS: Steady-state FP and MF trough plasma samples were determined from a clinical study by Fardon et al. in patients with persistent asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 s = 91%). The percent plasma protein binding of FP and MF was measured using ultracentrifugation. Free FP plasma concentrations were normalized for their differences in receptor binding affinity compared with MF and linked to overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine with an inhibitory E(max). RESULTS: A plot of steady-state FP and MF total trough plasma concentrations vs. dose showed that both drugs exhibit dose linearity. MF has comparable bioavailability to FP based on the steady-state concentrations observed for the different doses. The free plasma concentration producing 50% of urinary cortisol suppression (IC(50)) for MF was not statistically different from the free, normalized IC(50) for FP. CONCLUSION: FP and MF have similar pulmonary deposition and the same potential to cause systemic side-effects due to their similar IC(50) values. The observed urinary cortisol suppression of FP and MF is in agreement with their systemic availability, their differences in plasma protein binding and receptor binding affinity.     

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of fluticasone propionate after inhaled administration

Objective: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic and systemic pharmacodynamic properties of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP). Methods: Single doses of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 3.0 mg FP were administered to groups of six healthy subjects. Serum concentration profiles of FP were monitored over 24 h by means of high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS–MS). Systemic pharmacodynamic effects were evaluated by measuring endogenous serum cortisol and circulating white blood cells, and analyzed with previously developed integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models. Results: FP showed a dose-independent terminal half-life with a mean (SD) of 6.0 (0.7) h. Maximum serum concentrations occurred 1.0 (0.5) h after administration, ranging from 90 pg · ml⁻¹ for the 0.25 mg dose to 400 pg · ml⁻¹ for the 3.0 mg dose. This, together with an estimated mean absorption time of nearly 5 h and a known oral bioavailability of less than 1%, indicates prolonged residence at and slow absorption from the lungs. In the investigated dose range, the cumulative systemic effect was dose-dependent for both markers of pharmacodynamic activity. For doses of 0.25, 0.50, 1.0 and 3.0 mg FP, the PK/PD-based cumulative systemic-effect parameters were 159, 186, 257 and 372% · h for lymphocyte suppression, 107, 186, 202 and 348% · h for granulocyte induction and 23.6%, 33.8%, 51.0% and 73.6% for cortisol reduction, respectively. The time courses of lymphocytes, granulocytes and endogenous cortisol could be sufficiently characterized with the applied PK/PD models. The measured in vivo EC₅₀ values, 30 pg · ml⁻¹ and 7.3 pg · ml⁻¹ for white blood cells and cortisol, respectively, were in good agreement with predictions based on the in vitro relative receptor affinity of FP. Conclusion: After inhalation, FP follows linear pharmacokinetics and exhibits dose-dependent systemic pharmacodynamic effects that can be described by PK/PD modeling. Received: 27 January 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 5 August 1997