Initiation of two distinct forms of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia during programmed ventricular stimulation in man

Of 42 patients with supraventricular tachycardia related to dual atrioventricular (A-V) nodal pathway conduction, 8 had sustained tachycardia induced during programmed ventricular stimulation. The characteristics of the tachycardia in three patients suggested that the A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia used a slow pathway for anterograde conduction and a fast pathway for retrograde conduction (slow-fast form). In these patients, the retrograde effective refractory period was longer in the slow than in the fast pathway. Ventriculoatrial (V-A) conduction curves (V₁-V₂, A₁-A₂) were smooth. Ventricular premature beats, being conducted retrograde over the fast pathway, could activate the slow pathway in an anterograde direction, initiating the slow-fast form of A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia. In the remaining five patients, the tachycardia used a fast pathway for anterograde conduction and a slow pathway for retrograde conduction (fast-slow form). In these patients, the retrograde effective refractory period was longer in the fast than in the slow pathway. V-A conduction curves (V₁-V₂, A₁-A₂) could be either smooth or discontinuous if there was a sudden increase in V-A conduction time. Ventricular premature beats, conducted retrograde over the slow pathway, could activate the fast pathway in an anterograde direction, establishing a tachycardia circuit in reverse of the slow-fast form. In both groups of patients, the ventricular pacing cycle length appeared to be a crucial factor in the ability to expose functional discordance between the two A-V nodal pathways during retrograde conduction.The fast-slow form of A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia, similar to the slow-fast form, could also be induced during atrial premature stimulation in two patients. In this situation, the slow pathway having an anterograde effective refractory period longer, than that of the fast pathway was a requisite condition; anterograde A-V nodal conduction curves (A₁-A₂, H₁-H₂) were smooth. Atrial premature beats, conducted anterograde over the fast pathway, could activate the slow pathway in a retrograde direction resulting In an atrial echo or sustained fast-slow form of A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia.     

Quintuple pathways participating in three distinct types of atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia in a patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

Electrophysiologic studies were performed in a patient with recurrent supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Sinus and paced atrial beats had QRS complexes characteristic of atrioventricular (A-V) conduction through a manifest left lateral accessory pathway (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, type A). Three distinct types of A-V reciprocating tachycardia and three different modes of retrograde atrial activation were demonstrated. Type 1 tachycardia involved the slow A-V nodal pathway and a second (left lateral or left paraseptal) accessory A-V pathway capable of retrograde conduction only. Type 2 tachycardia was of the slow-fast A-V nodal pathway type. Type 3 tachycardia involved a heretofore undescribed circuit in that retrograde conduction occurred through an accessory A-V pathway with long retrograde conduction times and anterograde conduction through both the manifest left lateral accessory A-V pathway and fast A-V nodal pathway. Premature ventricular beats delivered late in the cycle of this tachycardia advanced (but did not change) the retrograde atrial activity without affecting the timing of the corresponding anterograde H deflection. In summary, this patient had five (three accessory and two intranodal) pathways participating in three different types of A-V reciprocating tachycardia; the recurrence of these were prevented with oral amiodarone therapy.     

Electrophysiologic evidence for selective retrograde utilization of a specialized conducting system in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

In 12 patients with atrioventricular (A-V) nodal reentrant tachycardia, the existence and utilization of retrograde ventriculoatrial bypass tracts in the reentrant process were excluded, and the characteristics of the anterograde and retrograde limbs of the reentrant circuits were studied using His bundle electrograms, incremental atrial and ventricular pacing and atrial and ventricular extrastimulus techniques before and after the administration of 0.01 mg/kg of intravenous ouabain. Similar studies were also performed in five control patients without tachycardia. Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia could be induced in all 12 patients during atrial pacing-induced A-V nodal Wenckebach periods or premature atrial stimulation, or both. On the basis of conduction time in the retrograde limb during tachycardia and during retrograde studies, two groups were identified. Group I (seven patients) had (1) short (39 ± 10 msec) and constant conduction time in the retrogarde limb measured from the anterograde His bundle deflection to the retrograde atrial echo response (H-Ae interval), (2) no change in ventriculoatrial conduction time up to maximal ventricular pacing rates, (3) H₂-A₂ intervals during retrograde refractory period studies that were identical to the H-Ae intervals and that did not increase with decreasing V₁-V₂ intervals, and (4) increased conduction time of the anterograde limb (Ae-H intervals) after the administration of ouabain without any effect on retrograde limb conduction (H-Ae and H₂-A₂ intervals) and refractoriness. Group II (five patients) had (1) long and variable H-Ae intervals (60 to 180 msec), (2) a progressive increase in ventriculoatrial intervals during incremental ventricular pacing, (3) an increase in H₂-A₂ intervals in response to decreasing V₁-V₂ intervals, and (4) increased anterograde (Ae-H interval) and retrograde limb (H-Ae and H₂-A₂ intervals) conduction and refractoriness after the administration of ouabain. Changes in the H₂-A₂ interval corresponded to the changes in four of the five control patients. These findings suggest that (1) in group I the anterograde limb was the A-V node, whereas the retrograde limb was an A-V nodal bypass tract or an insulated intranodal tract physiologically unlike the A-V node; and (2) in group II the A-V node comprised both the anterograde and retrograde limbs of the reentrant circuit.     

The Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: Pharmacologic effects of procaine amide

The effect of procaine amide, 10 mg. per kilogram via intravenous infusion, was studied in 13 patients with the WPW syndrome. The delta wave was eliminated by procaine amide in 10 and modified in three patients. This effect lasted between 30 minutes and 8 1/2 hours and was unrelated to the total dose administered. Anterograde A-V conduction was assessed by atrial pacing with increasing rates. More rapid atrial pacing rates with 1:1 A-V conduction were observed in patients who maintained rather than lost their delta wave during pacing. Ventriculoatrial conduction was assessed with ventricular pacing at increasing rates; ventricular conduction time was fixed regardless on the pacing rate. Procaine amide significantly prolonged V-A conduction time in six and blocked V-A conduction in one patient. In addition, A-V and V-A refractory periods were measured by the extrastimulus technique. Two types of responses were observed: (1) Type I or (2) line of identity. A-V nodal refractoriness was observed to be within the normal range. Procaine amide converted anterograde line of identity responses to Type I responses in all patients who had their delta waves eliminated. In this patient group, bypass refractoriness was shorter than A-V nodal refractoriness. Procaine amide was not observed to alter significantly normal A-V conduction as assessed by atrial pacing or A-V refractory period measurements. Furthermore, a significant disparity between the effects of procaine amide on anterograde and retrograde bypass refractoriness was observed. Tachycardias could be induced in nine of the 13 patients with a mean rate of 167.2 +/- 7.9 beats per minute; delta waves were abent during all episodes of tachycardia. Procaine amide prevented tachycardia induction in six of the none patients. Procaine amide therefore demonstrates electrophysiologic effects which would be beneficial for prevention or treatment of reciprocating tachycardias in the WPW syndrome. Moreover, procaine amide would be an ideal agent for the prevention of rapid ventricular rates in patients with the WPW syndrome and atrial fibrillation.     

Effect of catheter position on the initiation of atrial echoes with atrial pacing and premature stimulation in patients with accessory pathways

Eleven patients with an accessory pathway and reciprocating tachycardia were studied using both fixed rate atrial pacing and the atrial extrastimulus technique. Six of the patients had an accessory pathway that conducted in both the anterograde and retrograde direction; but the effective refractory period of their accessory pathway in the anterograde direction was relatively long and was greater than the longest coupling intervals that initiated atrial echoes. Five patients had an accessory pathway that conducted only in the retrograde direction.The extrastimulus technique could be used with stimulation sites near to and remote from the accessory pathway in 10 of the 11 patients. Atrial echoes were initiated by a single atrial extrastimulus at both sites in 7 of the 10 patients, and in each patient the upper limit of the echo zone was longer with stimulation at the site near the accessory pathway. In the other three patients atrial echoes were initiated only during stimulation at the site near the acessory pathway because either atrial refractoriness or atrioventricular nodal refractoriness was encountered before the echo zone was entered during stimulation at the site remote from the accessory pathway.Differences in the longest cycle length that initiated an atrial echo during fixed rate atrial pacing were similarly demonstrated in three patients. In these three patients, pacing at the site near the accessory pathway initiated echoes at a longer cycle length than pacing at the site remote from the accessory pathway. In three other patients the electrophysiologic characteristics of atrioventricular conduction prevented a demonstration of these differences. Catheter position is an important variable in the initiation of atrial echoes in patients with accessory pathways.     

Retrograde block during dual pathway atrioventricular nodal reentrant paroxysmal tachycardia

There are limited reported data regarding the occurrence of retrograde block during dual pathway atrioventricular (A-V) nodal reentrant paroxysmal tachycardia. This study describes two patients with this phenomenon. The first patient had 2:1 and type 1 retrograde ventriculoatrial block during the common variety of A-V nodal reentrance (slow pathway for anterograde and fast pathway for retrograde conduction). Fractionated atrial electrograms suggested that the site of block was within the atria. The second patient had type 1 retrograde block (between the A-V node and the low septal right atrium) during the unusual variety of A-V nodal reentrance (stow pathway for retrograde and fast pathway for anterograde conduction). The abolition of retrograde block by atropine suggested that the site of block was within A-V nodal tissue. Both cases demonstrate that intact retrograde conduction is not necessary for the continuation of A-V nodal reentrant paroxysymal tachycardia. Case 2 supports the hypothesis that the atria are not a requisite part of the A-V nodal reentrant pathway.     

Supraventricular tachycardia in lown-ganong-levine syndrome: Atrionodal versus intranodal reentry

The mechanism of the abbreviated atrioventricular (A-V) nodal conduction time and paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia in the LownGanong-Levine syndrome was evaluated in six patients. In each the A-H interval increased in response to rapid atrial pacing and atrial extrastimuli; typical dual A-V nodal pathways were demonstrated. In five patients studied at two cycle lengths prolongation of conduction and refractoriness of the “fast” pathway was noted at the shorter basic cycle length. Propranolol prolonged conduction and refractoriness of the “fast” pathway in three patients and in one produced Wenckebach conduction during atrial pacing which did not occur prior to its administration. In three patients the atrium did not appear necessary to sustain Supraventricular tachycardia. These findings suggest that preferential rapidly conducting A-V nodal fibers and intranodal reentry are the responsible mechanisms in those patients with Lown-Ganong-Levine syndrome and reciprocating tachycardia.     

Analysis of anterograde and retrograde fast pathway properties in patients with dual atrioventricular nodal pathways: Observations regarding the pathophysiology of the Lown-Ganong-Levine syndrome

Anterograde and retrograde fast pathway properties were analyzed in 160 patients with anterograde dual atrioventricular (A-V) nodal pathways, with or without A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia. A-H intervals (reflecting anterograde fast pathway conduction) ranged from 46 to 234 ms (mean ± standard deviation 91 ± 30). The longest atrial paced cycle lengths at which block occurred in the anterograde fast pathway ranged from 231 to 857 ms (435 ± 112). Regression analysis of these cycle lengths versus A-H intervals revealed a correlation coefficient (r) value of 0.41 (p < 0.01). Retrograde fast pathway conduction was present (at a ventricular paced cycle length slightly shorter than sinus rhythm) in 84 of 125 patients: 15 of 16 with an A-H interval of less than 60 ms, 44 of 58 with an interval of 60 to 90 ms, 20 of 41 with an interval of 91 to 130 ms and 5 of 10 with an A-H Interval of more than 130 ms (p < 0.01). Retrograde fast pathway conduction was intact at a cycle length of 375 ms in 41 of 124 patients: 11 of 16 with an A-H interval of less than 60 ms, 22 of 57 with an interval of 60 to 90 ms, 7 of 41 with an interval of 91 to 130 ms and 1 of 10 with an A-H interval of more than 130 ms (p <0.01). Sustained A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia could be induced in 51 of 160 patients, being induced in 7 of 17 with an A-H interval of less than 60 ms, 27 of 72 with an interval of 60 to 90 ms, 15 of 59 with an interval of 91 to 130 and 2 of 10 with an interval greater than 130 ms (p < 0.05).In conclusion, in patients with dual A-V nodal pathways, there are relations between the A-H interval and the ability of the fast pathway to sustain sequential anterograde conduction, and between the A-H interval and the ability of the fast pathway to sustain sequential retrograde conduction. Among patients with dual pathways, patients with a shorter A-H interval are more likely to have A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia, because these patients are more likely to have excellent retrograde fast pathway sequential conduction (a requirement for the occurrence of reentrant tachycardia).     

Multiple reentrant tachycardias due to retrograde conduction of dual atrioventricular bundles with atrioventricular nodal-like properties.

A patient is presented who had two paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias, one slow and incessant and the other fast. Both paroxysmal tachycardias appeared to be atrioventricular (A-V) reentrant, with anterograde conduction by way of a normal A-V pathway. Two pathways conducting in retrograde manner were demonstrated, characterized by different conduction times (fast and slow), identical abnormal atrial activation sequence and A-V nodal-like properties (retrograde Wenckebach periodicity with rapid ventricular pacing, and depression with ouabain and propranolol). Thus, there appeared to be two anomalous A-V bundles with nodal-like properties conducting in retrograde fashion. Whether the paroxysmal tachycardia was fast or slow depended on which of these pathways was utilized. Spontaneous cure of incessant paroxysmal tachycardia was observed and coincided with unexplained total loss of ability for ventriculoatrial conduction.     

Comparison of the electrophysiologic effects of intravenous and oral verapamil in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

The electrophysiologic effects of intravenous verapamil (a bolus dose of 0.15 mg/kg body weight followed by infusion of 0.005 mg/kg per min) were compared with those of oral verapamil (80 mg every 6 hours for 48 hours) in eight patients who had paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia. The mechanism of tachycardia was atrioventricular (A-V) nodal reentry in four patients and A-V reentry utilizing an accessory pathway for retrograde conduction in the remaining four. The electrophysiologic effects of oral and intravenous verapamil were similar. Both preparations significantly prolonged anterograde effective and functional refractory periods of the A-V node (p < 0.001). Both significantly increased the shortest pacing cycle length maintaining 1:1 anterograde conduction over the A-V node (p < 0.001). Retrograde conduction over the A-V node was greatly prolonged with verapamil in one patient but was unaffected in the others. There was no significant effect on sinoatrial conduction time, sinus nodal recovery time or atrial or ventricular refractoriness. Both preparations prevented induction of tachycardia in six patients none of whom had recurrence of sustained tachycardia while receiving long-term oral therapy (5 to 10 months). Neither preparation had a significant effect in two patients and this predicted failure of long-term oral therapy in one of these patients.The results of acute drug testing with intravenous verapamil can be extrapolated to predict the electrophysiologic results and response to long-term therapy with oral verapamil.     

Retrograde dual atrioventricular nodal pathways

Thirty-one (3.5 percent) of 887 studied patients had retrograde dual atrioventricular (A-V) nodal pathways, as manifested by discontinuous retrograde A-V nodal conduction curves (29 patients) or by two sets of ventriculoatrial (V-A) conduction intervals at the same paced cycle length (2 patients). All patients had A-V nodal reentrant ventricular echoes of the unusual variety induced with ventricular stimulation (25 patients had single, 2 patients had double and 4 patients had more than three ventricular echoes). The weak link of the reentrant circuit was always the retrograde slow pathway. Eleven of the 31 patients also had anterograde dual A-V nodal pathways (bidirectional dual pathways). Eight patients (26 percent) had spontaneous as well as inducible A-V nodal reentrant paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (of the unusual type in three and the usual type in five). In addition, three patients (10 percent) had only inducible supraventricular tachycardia (two of the unusual and one of the usual type).Retrograde dual A-V nodal pathways are uncommon. They are associated with the finding of at least single A-V nodal reentrant ventricular echoes (all patients), anterograde dual pathways (one third of patients) and A-V nodal reentrant paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia of the usual or unusual variety (one third of patients).     

Initiation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in patients with discontinuous anterograde atrioventricular nodal conduction curves with and without documented supraventricular tachycardia: Observations on the role of a discontinuous retrograde conduction curve

To evaluate factors playing a role in initiation of atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia utilizing anterogradely a slow and retrogradely a fast conducting AV nodal pathway, 38 patients having no accessory pathways and showing discontinuous anterograde AV nodal conduction curves during atrial stimulation were studied. Twenty-two patients (group A) underwent an electrophysiologic investigation because of recurrent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) that had been electrocardiographically documented before the study. Sixteen patients (group B) underwent the study because of a history of palpitations (15 patients) or recurrent ventricular tachycardia (one patient); in none of them had SVT ever been electrocardiographically documented before the investigation. Twenty-one of the 22 patients of group A demonstrated continuous retrograde conduction curves during ventricular stimulation. In 20 tachycardia was initiated by either a single atrial premature beat (18 patients) or by two atrial premature beats. Fifteen of the 16 patients of group B had discontinuous retrograde conduction curves during ventricular stimulation, with a long refractory period of their retrograde fast pathway. Tachycardia was initiated by multiple atrial premature beats in one patient. Thirteen out of the remaining 15 patients received atropine. Thereafter tachycardia could be initiated in three patients by a single atrial premature beat, by two atrial premature beats in one patient, and by incremental atrial pacing in another patient. In the remaining eight patients tachycardia could not be initiated. Our observations indicate that the pattern of ventriculoatrial conduction found during ventricular stimulation is a marker for ease of initiation of AV nodal tachycardia in patients with discontinuous anterograde AV nodal conduction curves.     

The fast-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children

An unusual form of atrioventricular (A-V) nodal reentry is described as the underlying mechanism for incessant tachycardia in two children. During tachycardia a fast pathway was utilized for anterograde conduction and a slow pathway for retrograde conduction. This is the reverse of the usual form of A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia, in which the slow pathway is utilized for anterograde conduction and the fast pathway for retrograde conduction. One patient had a smooth ventriculoatrial (V-A) conduction curve demonstrating exclusive utilization of the slow pathway for retrograde conduction. The other had a discontinuous V-A conduction curve demonstrating failure of retrograde fast pathway conduction with resultant slow pathway conduction. In both cases the retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway was longer than that of the slow pathway, resulting in the establishment of this unusual reentry circuit. Both patients had a superior P axis with a P-R interval shorter than the R-P interval during tachycardia, features described in a significant number of children with incessant tachycardia. This unusual form of reentrant tachycardia can be suggested by its electrocardiographic pattern and is another mechanism for reentrant tachycardia not previously documented in children.     

Induction of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia after atropine. Report of five cases.

After intravenous administration of 0.5 mg of atropine sustained atrioventricular (A-V) nodal reentrant tachycardia could be produced in five patients who had no prior historical or electrocardiographic evidence of supraventricular tachycardia. During the control period single atrial echo beats could be demonstrated in four of the five patients, but no instance of sustained tachycardia occurred. Atropine, known to enhance A-V nodal conduction, allowed achievement of longer A-H intervals (Case 1) and provided the necessary balance of conduction and refractoriness within the A-V nodal reentrant pathways (Cases 1 to 5) to sustain A-V nodal reentry in these patients.     

Differential Effect of Adenosine on Anterograde and Retrograde Fast Pathway Conduction in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Adenosine and Retrograde Fast Pathway Conduction . Introduction : Several studies have shown that the fast pathway is more responsive to adenosine than the slow pathway in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Little information is available regarding the effect of adenosine on anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction.
Methods and Results : The effects of adenosine on anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction were evaluated in 116 patients (mean age 47 ± 16 years) with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Each patient received 12 mg of adenosine during ventricular pacing at a cycle length 20 msec longer than the fast pathway VA block cycle length and during sinus rhythm or atrial pacing at 20 msec longer than the fast pathway AV block cycle length. Anterograde block occurred in 98% of patients compared with retrograde fast pathway block in 62% of patients ( P < 0.001). Unresponsiveness of the retrograde fast pathway to adenosine was associated with a shorter AV block cycle length (374 ± 78 vs 333 ± 74 msec, P < 0.01), a shorter VA block cycle length (383 ± 121 vs 307 ± 49 msec, P < 0.001), and a shorter VA interval during tachycardia (53 ± 23 vs 41 ± 17 msec, P < 0.01).
Conclusion : Although anterograde fast pathway conduction is almost always blocked by 12 mg of adenosine, retrograde fast pathway conduction is not blocked by adenosine in 38% of patients with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. This indicates that the anterograde and retrograde fast pathways may be anatomically and/or functionally distinct. Unresponsiveness of VA conduction to adenosine is not a reliable indicator of an accessory pathway.     

Demonstration of dual atrioventricular nodal pathways utilizing a ventricular extrastimulus in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

In patients with atrioventricular (A-V) nodal re-entrant paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), atrial extrastimulus technique frequently reveals discontinuous A1-A2, H1-H2 curves suggestive of dual A-V nodal pathways. To further test the hypothesis that these curves in fact reflect dual A-V nodal pathways, a ventricular extrastimulus (VS) was coupled either to A2 at a fixed A1-A2 interval which reliably produced an A-V nodal re-entrant atrial echo (E) with a constant A2-E interval in two patients, or to QRS complex (V) during sustained PSVT with a constant E-E interval in one patient. Three response zones were defined: at longer A2-VS or V-VS coupling interval, VS manifested no effect on the timing of E (Zone 1). At closer A2-VS or V-VS coupling interval, VS conducted to the atrium, shortening the apparent A2-E or E-E interval (Zone 2). At shortest A2-VS or V-VS coupling interval, VS was blocked retrogradely, and no E was induced (Zone 3). The ability of VS to preempt control of the atria (Zone 2 response) strongly suggests the presence of dual A-V nodal pathways in these PSVT patients. If only a single pathway were present, VS would of necessity collide with the antegrade impulse and could not reach the atria. The Zone 3 response occurs because of retrograde refractoriness of the fast pathway. Failure of the echo during Zone 3 probably reflects concealed conduction to the fast pathway, or possibly interference in the slow pathway.     

Clinical and electrophysiologic observations in patients with concealed accessory atrioventricular bypass tracts

In 12 of 46 consecutive patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia or atrial flutter-fibrillation, without electrocardiographic evidence of ventricular preexcitation, electrophysiologic studies suggested the presence of accessory atrioventricular (A-V) pathways capable only of retrograde conduction (concealed Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome). The ages of these patients ranged from 29 days to 71 years (mean 39.2 years). Most patients were clinically symptomatic with palpitations, dizziness, weakness or congestive heart failure. One patient had “cardiac dysrhythmia” described by an obstetrician during intrauterine life. Eleven patients manifested A-V reciprocating tachycardia involving the normal pathway for anterograde conduction and the accessory pathway for retrograde conduction. The remaining patient manifested recurrent paroxysms of atrial flutter-fibrillation as a result of rapid ventriculoatrial activation through the accessory pathway during the atrial vulnerable phase.

The electrophysiologic observations were analyzed with regard to clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics in these patients. The presence of concealed accessory pathways should be suspected in patients presenting with (1) an “incessant” form of tachycardia, (2) spontaneous onset of A-V reciprocal rhythms or reciprocating tachycardias after acceleration of the sinus rate without antecedent atrial extrasystoles or P-R interval prolongation, (3) slowing of the tachycardia rate consequent to the development of functional bundle branch block, (4) retrograde P waves (negative in leads II, III and aVF) discernible after the QRS complexes, with the R-P interval being shorter than the P-R interval during both A-V reciprocal rhythm and reciprocating tachycardia, and (5) oc-currence of atrial flutter-fibrillation in association with A-V reciprocal rhythms.

It is suggested that medical treatment in patients having concealed accessory pathways should be aimed at increasing the refractoriness of either the A-V node or the accessory pathway for reciprocating tachycardia, while increasing the refractoriness of the atrium and the accessory pathway in cases with atrial flutter-fibrillation. Pacemaker therapy and surgical intervention may be indicated in selected patients refractory to antiarrhythmic agents.     

One to one atrioventricular conduction during atrial pacing at rates of 300/minute in absence of wolff-parkinson-white syndrome

One to one atrioventricular (A-V) or atrio-His bundle (A-H) conduction occurred during right atrial pacing at rates of 300/min in two patients with short P-R (and A-H) intervals, narrow QRS complexes and recurrent supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Patient 1 had episodes of reciprocating A-V tachycardia and of atrial fibrillation with very fast rates (270 to 290/min) that were slowed to 100 to 135/min after administration of intravenous verapamil. Enhanced A-V (A-H) conduction was exposed only during stimulation from the high right atrium, but not from the low lateral right atrium or coronary sinus. Patient 2 had episodes of atrial flutter with 1:1 A-V conduction and rates of 290/min. The H-V interval was short (25 ms) during sinus rhythm and atrial pacing presumably because conduction occurred through an atrio-“distal” His bundle (atriofascicular) tract. In contrast, the H-V interval was normal (40 ms) in echo beats or when the “proximal” His bundle was stimulated.In these two patients, having as “common denominators” short P-R (and A-H) intervals, narrow QRS complexes and recurrent supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, enhanced A-V (A-H) conduction was (1) possibly due to different electrogenetic mechanisms; (2) pacing-site dependent; (3) manifested, during atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, by extremely fast ventricular rates; and (4) unrelated to the rate of reciprocating A-V tachycardias because the latter was predominantly a function of anterograde conduction through the “slow” nodal pathway.     

Electrophysiologic demonstration of bilateral anomalous pathways in a patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (type B preexcitation).

Pre- and postoperative electrophysiologic studies are described that were suggestive of two (right- and left-sided) anomalous atrioventricular (A-V) connections in a patient with type B Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and intractable arrhythmias, who underwent epicardial mapping and successful surgical ablation of the right-sided anomalous pathway. The presence of the right-sided anomalous pathway capable of both antegrade and retrograde conduction was suggested by the following observations: (1) Type B preexcitation on the surface electro-cardiogram; (2) maximal preexcitation and minimal stimulus-delta with low lateral right atrial pacing; (3) epicardial mapping of the atria and ventricles; and (4) disappearance of ventricular preexcitation after surgical ablation of the right-sided anomalous pathway. The presence of an additional left-sided anomalous pathway capable of only retrograde conduction (concealed on the surface electrocardiogram) was sugg-sted by the following observations: (1) Left to right retrograde atrial activation sequence during reentrant tachycardia and ventricular pacing at rapid rates and with coupled ventricular pacing postoperatively; (2) spontaneous conversion of wide ORS tachycardia utilizing the anomalous pathway for antegrade conduction to narrow QRS tachycardia with significant slowing in rate; and (3) smooth antegrade A-V nodal conduction curves with echo zone postoperatively. The demonstration of bilateral anomalous pathway in patients with preexcitation has important electrophysiologic and surgical implications.     

Transient entrainment and interruption of atrioventricular node tachycardia

The possibility of transiently entraining and interrupting the common type of atrioventricular (AV) node tachycardia (anterograde slow, retrograde fast AV node pathway) was studied using atrial and ventricular pacing in 18 patients with paroxysmal AV node tachycardia. Transient entrainment occurred in all patients. During atrial pacing, localized block in the AV node for one beat followed by anterograde conduction over the fast pathway was observed in three patients. During ventricular pacing, localized block for one beat followed by retrograde conduction over the slow pathway was not observed in any patient. Neither atrial nor ventricular fusion beats were observed during entrainment. These observations indicate in a way not previously shown that reentry involving two functionally dissociated pathways in the AV node is the underlying mechanism of paroxysmal AV node tachycardia. The inability to demonstrate atrial or ventricular fusion beats during entrainment suggests a true intranodal location of the reentrant circuit. Finally, the ability to transiently entrain intranodal tachycardia demonstrates that this electrophysiologic phenomenon is not exclusively limited to macroreentrant circuits.