Short communication: A printed image quality test phantom for mammography

This communication describes a novel design for a mammographic image quality test phantom, the final design of which was produced as a radiographer weekly quality assurance phantom for breast screening and symptomatic mammography. The phantom is based on low contrast test features which are built up by superimposing sheets of Mylar overhead projector transparency, on which the test features are printed using a standard LaserJet printer. The required radiation contrast at mammographic energies is produced by the approximately 50% by weight component of iron oxide (Fe(3)O(4)) present in the toner. An easily replicated design of mammographic image quality phantom based on LaserJet printed test features is described. Approximately 40 of these phantoms were constructed, and these have been used successfully for 5 years in both breast screening and symptomatic mammography. The phantom design offers a performance similar to much more expensive mammographic contrast-detail phantoms, but suffers from the disadvantage that high contrast resolution bar patterns cannot be produced using the standard printing process.     

Effects of a defective filter on magnification image quality in mammography.

A defective molybdenum filter in a dedicated mammographic unit was found to have a detrimental effect on image quality. The authors present a simple method for testing of molybdenum filters and suggest that it be incorporated into the acceptance testing routine for new mammographic units and that it be used in annual quality control checks.     

Image quality and dose in film-screen magnification mammography

Extended exposure times in magnification mammography are a result of the reduced X-ray tube currents required for a small focal spot. The consequences of this are the potential for reduced image quality through motion blur during exposure as well as the onset of film reciprocity law failure. Previous investigators have suggested increasing the X-ray tube potential as a practical mechanism for reducing exposure times in magnification mammography and have demonstrated negligible image quality degradation at least up to 32 kVp. This paper describes a film-screen magnification mammography study that expands upon this previous work to investigate the magnitude of the reduction of breast mean glandular dose and exposure time and the changes in subjective image quality (visibility of low contrast details in an RMI 152 phantom) with increases in tube potential between 28 kVp and 35 kVp. Measures of changes in the radiographic contrast and in the scatter-to-primary ratio (SPR) in magnification geometry as a function of tube potential were also obtained. Evidence for reciprocity law failure was also assessed. For a constant film optical density, increasing the X-ray tube potential from 28 kVp to 35 kVp reduced the mean glandular dose from 3.9 mGy to 2.7 mGy and reduced the exposure time from 3.2 s to 1.0 s. Over this range, the detection rate of fibrils and microcalcification-mimicking specks did not vary with tube potential at the 0.05 level of significance. It was found that only the low contrast mass detail detection rate at 35 kVp was significantly less than that at 28 kVp. The measured radiographic contrast decreased with tube potential and the SPR increased with tube potential. However, both changes were weak, and linear regressions determined that the 95% confidence intervals of the slopes relating both contrast and SPR with tube potential encompassed zero. It is concluded that magnification mammography performed at 34 kVp yields significant reductions in exposure time and mean glandular dose, with a detail detection capability similar to that at 28 kVp.     

Application of phase contrast imaging to mammography

Phase contrast images were obtained experimentally by using a customized mammography unit with a nominal focal spot size of 100 microm and variable source-to-image distances of up to 1.5 m. The purpose of this study was to examine the applicability and potential usefulness of phase contrast imaging for mammography. A mammography phantom (ACR156 RMI phantom) was imaged, and its visibility was examined. The optical density of the phantom images was adjusted to approximately 1.3 for both the contact and phase contrast images. Forty-one observers (18 medical doctors and 23 radiological technologists) participated in visual evaluation of the images. Results showed that, in comparison with the images of contact mammography, the phantom images of phase contrast imaging demonstrated statistically significantly superior visibility for fibers, clustered micro-calcifications, and masses. Therefore, phase contrast imaging obtained by using the customized mammography unit would be useful for improving diagnostic accuracy in mammography.     

Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study

This study evaluated how tube potential-filter combinations [with a molybdenum (Mo) anode and either an Mo or a rhodium (Rh) filter] influence image quality and radiation dose to breasts of different thicknesses in film-screen mammography using a new mammography phantom (CDMAM Phantom Type 3.4). A 28-kVp/Mo tube potential-filter combination is recommended for a breast (phantom) thickness of 40 mm or less, 28 kVp/Rh for a breast (phantom) thickness of 60 mm or less, and 30 kVp/Rh for a breast (phantom) thickness greater than 60 mm.     

The factor of magnification in mammography

The last generation of mammographic equipment allows mammography to be performed with direct magnification techniques, thanks to such technical features as microfocus, high focus-film distance, high-power generators. The authors compared the diagnostic yield of two different equipment sets, with 1.4x and 2x magnification respectively, and verified the utility of magnification radiography. A significant reduction was obtained in questionable diagnoses (42 to 18) in a group of 63 patients, with no evidence of substantial differences in the diagnostic yield of the images obtained with different magnification ratios. An objective analysis of the system resolution power privileges 2x magnification ratio, which however implies an increase in the average dose to the breast. The use of faster recording systems reduces the dose by 50%, though maintaining good image quality.     

A phantom for the measurement of contrast detail performance in film-screen mammography.

A National Breast Cancer Screening Programme, based on X-ray mammography, has been introduced in the UK. The success of this screening programme is dependent on the production of high quality radiographs. There are various methods of assessing imaging performance in mammography, but contrast detail detectability measurements have an advantage in that the observation of radiographs is taken into consideration. The design and construction of a contrast detail phantom for the assessment of image quality in mammography is described. This phantom can be used to assess the imaging performance of mammographic film-screen combinations. The results of some measurements to verify the accuracy of the contrast predictions are presented together with some initial results of an investigation into the contrast detail performance of film-screen combinations used in mammography.     

Dynamic MR mammography: three-dimensional real-time visualization of contrast enhancement in virtual reality

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: In view of the increasing use of breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to supplement x-ray mammography. the authors developed a method for fast and efficient analysis of dynamic MR images of the female breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MR image data sets were acquired with a saturation-recovery turbo fast low-angle shot sequence to detect the kinetics of the contrast agent concentration in the whole breast at a high temporal and spatial resolution. A morphologic three-dimensional fast low-angle shot data set was also acquired. The dynamic image data sets were analyzed with tracer kinetic modeling to describe the physiologic processes underlying the contrast enhancement in mathematical terms and enable the estimation of functional tissue-specific parameters, which reflect the status of microcirculation. To display morphologic and functional tissue information simultaneously, the authors developed a multidimensional real-time visualization system (with three-dimensional texture mapping), which enables a practical and intuitive human computer interface in virtual reality. RESULTS: The spatially differentiated representation of the computed functional tissue parameters superimposed on the anatomic information offers several possibilities: (a) more discernible contrast enhancement, (b) inspection of the data volume in three-dimensional space by means of rotation and transparency variation, (c) location of lesions in space and thus faster and more natural recognition of topologic coherencies, and (d) fast and efficient overview in compressed form. CONCLUSION: A feasibility study demonstrated that multidimensional visualization of contrast enhancement in virtual reality is a practicable idea. Detection and location of multiple breast lesions may be an important application.     

Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the potential of dynamic contrast enhancement after the intravenous administration of an iodine-based contrast medium in full-field digital mammography. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A protocol for image acquisition was established for contrast-enhanced mammography and the mammography unit (Senographe 2000D, GE Healthcare, Buc, France) changed as required. The effect of the protocol parameters on imaging was investigated. Subsequently, 21 patients with 25 suspicious lesions of the breast (10 benign, 1 borderline, and 14 malignant) underwent mammography with administration of an iodine-based contrast medium (Ultravist 370, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany), after approval of ethical committee as well as permission of German federal office for Radiation protection, and informed consent from each patient was obtained. Three sequential digital mammographic images of the respective breast were acquired after administration of the contrast medium at a dose of 1 mL/kg body weight and a flow of 4 mL/s. The postcontrast images were acquired 60, 120, and 180 seconds after administration. Subsequently, the precontrast image was logarithmically subtracted from the postcontrast images. Enhancement of the lesions was measured in absolute terms as well as relative to the enhancement of the glandular tissue. The subtracted images were evaluated for lesion depiction and dynamic contrast enhancement. Lesion-enhancement kinetics were compared with the histologic findings. RESULTS: All malignant lesions were identified on the contrast-enhanced images of digital mammography. Three of the tumors (2 malignant, 1 benign) were detected only by contrast-enhanced mammography and not by standard mammography. Dynamic enhancement curves of benign and malignant tumors in contrast-enhanced mammography look similar to the curves known from gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Nevertheless differentiation between malignant and benign tumors based on the enhancement patterns cannot be directly taken over from magnetic resonance imaging, as suggested by our initial results. The results are somewhat better when tumor enhancement relative to surrounding glandular tissue is used instead of absolute enhancement. CONCLUSION: The results of this preliminary study suggest that contrast-enhanced digital mammography is a potentially useful tool for the detection and the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.     

Real-time digital contrast enhancement and magnification in the assessment of acute elbow injuries

The elbow is a common site of injury and missed fractures may lead to disability and litigation. An assessment was made of a commercially available desk-top digital contrast enhancement and magnification unit (DETECT system) in a series of 320 patients with an acute elbow injury. Five radiologists of varying experience independently viewed elbow radiographs on a conventional light-box, and subsequently using the digitizer, indicating the presence or absence of a fracture. The overall results demonstrated no difference in performance when using the unit, though small improvements in the confidence with which a definite diagnosis was made were observed. Assessment of soft tissues with the digitizer was less reliable.     

Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection

The objective of this study is to compare image quality and lesion detection for full field digital mammography (FFDM) and film-screen mammography (FSM). In 200 women we performed digital mammography of one breast and film-screen mammography of the other breast. Imaging parameters were set automatically. Image quality, visualization of calcifications and masses were rated by three readers independently. Mean glandular dose was calculated for both systems. We found no significant difference in mean glandular dose. Image quality was rated by reader A/B/C as excellent for FFDM in 153/155/167 cases and for FSM in 139/116/114 cases (p<0.03/0.001/0.001). Microcalcifications were detected by FFDM in 103/89/98 and by FSM in 76/76/76 cases (p<0.01/0.06/0.01). Detection of masses did not differ significantly. FFDM provided significantly better visibility of skin and nipple-areola region (p<0.01). FFDM demonstrated improved image quality compared with film-screen mammography. Microcalcification detection was also significantly better with the digital mammography system for two of the three readers.     

两种数字乳腺X射线摄影系统的比较

目的探讨比较全视野数字乳腺X射线摄影系统(FFDM)与计算机乳腺X射线摄影系统(CRM)在影像质量与辐射剂量方面的差异。方法用FFDM对ALVIM乳腺摄影体模TRM进行自动曝光控制(AEC)摄影,再用CRM专用成像板(IP)在同一摄影机上用相同条件对体模摄影。固定AEC摄影时的kV值,选用曝光量数值14、16、18、22和24 mAs,在FFDM机上对模体摄影,记录上述摄影条件和入射皮肤剂量(ESD)及平均腺体剂量(AGD)。由5位影像科资深医师分别在相同条件下对所得影像进行软阅读,按照5分值判断法评判,然后绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)曲线,计算出每种信号的判断概率值(P_det),对所得数据进行统计学分析。结果在辐射剂量均为1.36 mGy时,FFDM对模体内钙化点和肿块灶P_det值比CRM高,尤其是微小钙化点和小肿块灶,微小钙化点最大差值为0.215,小肿块灶最大差值为0.245。在相同的P_det值下,FFDM的辐射剂量比CRM低,ESD的值降低了26%,腺体平均剂量降低了41%。在使用FFDM摄影时,当mAs值超过AEC值时,P_det值没有明显改变。结论在相同曝光条件下,FFDM对乳腺钙化点和肿块灶的检出率高于CRM;在获得相似图像质量时,FFDM的辐射剂量明显低于CRM。     

Trends in image quality in high magnification digital specimen cabinet radiography

Advances in microfocus X-ray tube design together with the availability of high resolution charge coupled device (CCD) detectors have led to the introduction of high magnification digital specimen cabinets for the examination of tissue samples. This paper explores the effect that the high magnification geometry permitted by such units has upon image quality in terms of phase contrast edge enhancement, spatial resolution and the appearance of test phantom images. Phase contrast effects and spatial resolution were studied using a previously established method (using edge profiles) and by computing the system spatial frequency response at various geometries. It was demonstrated that the magnitude of the phase contrast enhancement effect reaches a stable maximum at a magnification of x 4. It has also been shown that a continual increase in both the spatial resolution together with an improved signal to noise ratio occurs up to the maximum permissible magnification geometry, with effects of focal spot blur being negligible. In practice, the limited size of the digital detector and the difficulty of object alignment can constrain the use of the very high magnification option.     

Image quality in mammography with special reference to anti-scatter grids and the magnification technique

Some of the parameters determining image quality in mammography are analyzed: the effects of primary photon spectra, focal spot size and screen-film systems on spatial resolution are discussed as are scattered radiation, development temperature and absorbed dose. The parameters limiting spatial resolution and contrast are evaluated for the standard and magnification techniques. Methods of reducing scattered radiation to improve contrast are evaluated. Scatter to primary ratios for different scatter reducing methods are compared, using the physical quantity energy imparted. For the standard technique the spatial resolution has been found to be limited by the fluorescent screen. With magnification technique the focal spot is the weakest link for the spatial resolution. The contrast is mainly set by the amount of scatter using the standard technique considering the use of a low tube potential (approximately 25 kVp). Using the magnification technique the amount of scatter is so small, that the tube potential is the limiting factor. We have found the optimized standard mammographic technique to be achieved under the following conditions: 25 kVp, 0.3 to 0.6 mm focal spot, film-focus distance 500 mm, anti-scatter grid, developing temperature 36 to 38 degrees C and 4 minutes total processing time with the screen-film system we have used. In magnification technique an air gap of at least 20 mm is desired. With an FFD of about 500 mm this will give a magnification ratio of 1.8 to 2.0 and a 0.1 mm X 0.1 mm focus spot is mandatory. With this technique, it is necessary to use a faster screen-film system than that used in standard mammography.     

Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography: image contrast and lesion characterization

PURPOSE: This study compared screen-film mammography (SFM) with full-field digital mammography (FFDM) of the same patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients underwent surgery or biopsy, including 17 with carcinoma. Patients underwent both SFM and FFDM after providing informed consent. The abnormal findings consisted of 10 masses and 15 areas of microcalcification. The optical density of the breast tissue surrounding any lesion or mass was measured. Three readers evaluated the visibility of the masses and calcifications (contrast, margin, and type) by consensus from hard copies of the images. When evaluating FFDM, SFM was used as the standard of comparison. RESULTS: FFDM showed greater contrast of mass than SFM. The contrast of mass on FFDM was judged visually superior or equivalent to that of SFM, and microcalcifications were the same in most cases. The margin of the mass was better defined by FFDM in two cases. Determination of the type of microcalcification was similar for SFM and FFDM. CONCLUSION: FFDM provided greater contrast than SFM. FFDM might be helpful for detecting masses and observing their margins. Although FFDM may be of some use for detecting calcification, it has no advantage when determining the type of calcification.     

Real-time digital contrast enhancement and magnification in the assessment of scaphoid and other wrist injuries

A study on the value of a commercially available desk-top digital magnifier-contrast enhancer (DETECT System) was made in a series of 550 patients presenting with an acute wrist injury. Four radiologists, of varying experience, independently reviewed the radiographs on a conventional lightbox and later with the digitizer. In the scaphoid series (350 cases), the performance of the two more experienced radiologists was marginally better with the digitizer, whereas the less experienced radiologists performed slightly worse. Overall the digitizer improved the confidence of the radiologists in diagnosing correctly the presence of a scaphoid fracture but, for the less experienced radiologists, this was at the expense of identifying normality. In the wrist series (200 cases), the use of the digitizer resulted in a minor increase in the true positive and decrease in the false negative observations, but this was offset by a concomitant minor increase in the false positive and decrease in the true negative categories. Evaluation of the soft-tissue planes around the wrist joint showed a limited value in the identification of a scaphoid fracture with an overall positive predictive value of 0.26. Correlation of soft-tissue changes and the presence or absence of a scaphoid fracture was slightly worse with the digitizer. Possible causes for the apparently poorer performance of the digitizer are discussed, as well as the relative merits and potential value of the unit.