Subtalar distraction arthrodesis using a ramp cage

Subtalar distraction bone block arthrodesis has been described to treat late complications of displaced calcaneal fractures. A "ramp cage" can be used to restore the talocalcaneal relationship by providing stable correction in the coronal and sagittal dimensions.     

Medial approach for subtalar distraction bone block arthrodesis

Subtalar distraction bone block arthrodesis is a useful technique commonly employed in the management of calcaneal and talar fracture malunion. Traditionally it is performed via a posterolateral or extensile lateral approach, however such approaches have been associated with wound complications, particularly secondary to the added stress caused by the subtalar distraction crucial to this technique. Medial approaches to the subtalar joint have been used in other procedures but have not been reported in subtalar distraction bone block arthrodesis. A novel case and technique illustrating the medial approach for subtalar distraction bone block arthrodesis is discussed.Level of clinical evidenceLevel 4.     

Subtalar distraction arthrodesis using interpositional frozen structural allograft

BACKGROUND: Subtalar bone-block distraction arthrodesis using structural autograft carries the risk of donor site morbidity. Recent reports suggest that structural allograft may be an attractive alternative to structural autograft in subtalar arthrodesis. This prospective study analyzes subtalar distraction arthrodesis using interpositional structural allograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2000 and 2006, 22 patients (24 feet; mean age, 45.6 years) underwent subtalar arthrodesis with interpositional fresh-frozen femoral head structural allograft. Indications included subtalar arthrosis, loss of heel height, and anterior ankle impingement. Clinical outcome was assessed using the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system. Time to union was determined by previously reported clinical findings and radiographic evidence for bridging trabeculation between host bone and structural allograft. RESULTS: Mean followup was 35.8 months for 20 patients (21 feet) available for followup evaluation. Union was achieved in 19 of 21 patients (90%) at a mean of 15.5 (range, 11 to 19) weeks. Mean AOFAS hindfoot score improved from 21 to 71 points (p < 0.05). Radiographic analysis suggested significant (p < 0.05) improvement in all measurements. Complications included nonunion (2), varus malalignment (1), persistent subfibular impingement (1), sural neuralgia (1), and prominent hardware (2). Both patients with nonunions had avascular bone at the arthrodesis site and used tobacco products. CONCLUSION: This study supports recent publications that subtalar arthrodesis using interpositional structural allograft can have a favorable outcome. Our clinical and radiographic results suggest that restoration of hindfoot function and dimensions with structural allograft are comparable to results reported for the same procedure using structural autograft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prospective case series.     

Subtalar arthrodesis

A satisfactory outcome after isolated subtalar joint arthrodesis is dependent on proper patient selection, understanding the pathology and indications, and choosing the appropriate operative technique. Performing a thorough history and physical examination will assist in this process. Ancillary tests, including radiographs and advanced imaging, should be obtained to reinforce the surgeon's suspicions and to aid in the proper surgical planning for the patient. Also, a proper postoperative protocol should be used to allow for adequate healing, and,thus, optimize functional outcome.     

Subtalar distraction arthrodesis for calcaneal malunion - comparison of structural freeze-dried versus autologous iliac bone graft

BackgroundThis study aims to analyze the outcomes of subtalar distraction arthrodesis (SDA) for calcaneal malunion using structural freeze-dried iliac allograft (FDIA) compared to using autologous iliac bone (AIB).MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 57 consecutive cases (51 patients) of calcaneal malunion between March 2006 and December 2017. All patients were followed for an average of 22.8 months. All cases were treated by SDA using structural FDIA (17 cases, group 1), or AIB (40 cases, group 2). The outcome measures included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and radiographic measurements.ResultsThe mean postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months of AOFAS scores and VAS pain score were significantly better in group 2 than those in group 1 (p < 0.05, for all). There were 3 cases (17.6%) of nonunion in the group 1, whereas the group 2 had 2 cases (5.0%), which did not shown significant difference between two groups (p = 0.492). Although the mean pre-, postoperative, and final follow-up radiologic parameters in both groups were similar, (p > 0.05, for all) the difference of talocalcaneal height, talocalcaneal angle, and talar declination angle from postoperative to final follow-up were significantly bigger in the group 1. (p < 0.05, for all).ConclusionAlthough union rate was not significantly different between the two groups, we obtained more favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes in the autologous iliac bone group. Using FDIA without any orthobiological agent for SDA, there were significant more loss of radiological parameters due to inferior incorporation and biomechanical properties. When considering the SDA for calcaneal malunion, routine use of FDIA without any orthobiological agents as an interpositional graft for SDA is not recommended.     

改良小L形入路距下关节撑开植骨融合治疗陈旧性跟骨骨折距下关节炎

目的：观察改良跟腱旁后外侧小“L”入路距下关节撑开植骨融合治疗陈旧性跟骨骨折距下关节炎的疗效。方法：2009年3月至2012年9月,应用改良小“L”入路距下关节撑开植骨融合术治疗22例跟骨骨折伴距下关节炎患者,男13例,女9例;年龄22～49岁,平均35．3岁。病程11～32个月,平均21个月。根据Stephens-Sanders分型,Ⅱ型16例,Ⅲ型6例。通过改良AOFAS踝与后足评分标准对手术前后患足功能进行评估,比较改善程度。结果：1例出现皮缘坏死,无感染、螺钉断裂、植骨吸收及距骨坏死等情况发生。术后21例获随访,时间18～46个月,平均29个月。术后4个月融合处均获骨性愈合。末次随访时改良AOFAS评分由术前32-65分（平均50．8分）提高至末次随访66～92分（平均82．6分）,与术前比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）。结论：改良小“L”入路距下关节撑开植骨融合术是治疗陈旧性跟骨骨折并发距下关节炎的一种有效方法,临床操作简单,并发症少,可矫正跟骨骨折畸形愈合的主要病理改变,恢复足部外形并改善后足功能。     

Subtalar joint arthrodesis

Isolated subtalar joint arthrodesis has gained popularity more recently. Research has shown that it preserves rearfoot motion, does not increase the risk of arthritis in adjacent joints, and is not an especially complex operative procedure. It decreases the chance of midtarsal joint nonunion and malunion postoperatively. This article takes an in-depth approach to isolated talocalcaneal fusions. Anatomy and biomechanics of the subtalar joint are reviewed. Clinical presentation and radiologic evaluation are discussed. Conservative treatment, operative technique, and postoperative management are included.     

Subtalar arthrodesis in children

We present a clinical and radiological retrospective study of 30 patients (51 feet) with valgus deformity of the feet who had three different types of subtalar extraarticular and intraarticular arthrodesis. Children with cerebral palsy, myelomeningocele, and agenesis of the corpus callosum associated with progressive polyneuropathy were studied. The results were considered excellent and satisfactory in 73% of the feet. The combined Grice-Green-Batchelor procedure gave the best results, with 84% excellent and satisfactory results, with bony union in 96% of the feet. Weight-bearing films of the ankles in the anteroposterior plane are essential to determine the true extent of the deformity before operation.     

Subtalar arthrodesis with calcaneal osteotomy

The amount of postraumatic deformities of the calcaneus after fracture is classified in 5 types (Type I-V). The bony situation includes in the simple group A malunions, in group B the more demanding nonunions and in Group C the worst cases with additional aseptic or septic necrosis of parts of the calcaneus. For type I with posttraumatic arthritis of the subtalar joint and without malalignement, an in situ-arthrodesis is suitable. Type II, with an additional varus- or valgus hind foot deformity, but especially in type III with additional loss of height and dorsal tilting of the talus a bone block distraction arthrodesis is required. Type IV includes, additionally to the pathology of type I to type III, a lateral translation of the calcaneus. This indirectly causes a severe hind foot valgus and an abutment of the posterior facet towards the lateral malleolus. This type needs osteotomy of the calcaneus through the old fracture surfaces, performed using a bilateral approach. Type V is very rare but the most difficult one for reconstructive surgery because the talus is additionally tilted out of the ankle joint. Therefore, in addition to the bilateral approach and calcaneal osteotomy, an anteromedian approach to the ankle joint is necessary. The surgical procedure in group A (malunion) is more or less the same like in group B (nonunion). Group C (aseptic / septic osteonecrosis) needs a preliminary radical necrectomy in a two stage reconstructive procedure.     

Subtalar repositional arthrodesis for adult acquired flatfoot

Arthrodesis of the subtalar joint is well recognized treatment option for moderate or severe flatfoot associated with adult acquired flatfoot secondary to posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. The success of the subtalar arthrodesis is dependent on restoration of normal bony relationships in the hindfoot and midfoot. For this reason, a distinction is made between a repositional arthrodesis and the traditional in situ type of arthrodesis. An in vitro study of the adult acquired flatfoot identifies an anteroposterior subluxation of the subtalar articulation that can be corrected durably and reliably through a repositional talocalcaneal arthrodesis. Intraoperative reduction techniques are useful in obtaining reduction of the peritalar subluxation. There are certain clinical features that help identify patients with flatfoot deformities who are good candidates for subtalar fusion. As the pathoanatomy of the flatfoot deformity is better elucidated, treatment techniques are modified to better address the key elements of the deformity. A repositional subtalar arthrodesis was shown to produce excellent correction in a moderate to severe in vitro flatfoot example in the authors' clinical series.     

Subtalar joint arthrodesis using a single lag screw

BACKGROUND: This study tested the hypotheses that fusing the subtalar joint with a single lag screw from the posteroinferior calcaneus to the anterior talar neck is an effective technique and that factors affecting the time to fusion can be identified. METHODS: Between October, 1995, and July, 2002, the senior author (RAM) performed 101 isolated subtalar arthrodeses using a technique of single lag-screw fixation from posteroinferior to anterosuperior across the posterior facet of the subtalar joint combined with the application of an autograft taken from the floor of the sinus tarsi and anterior process. The average patient age was 52 (range 17 to 82) years. There were 52 women (53 arthrodeses) and 48 men (48 arthrodeses). Eight of 101 (8%) arthrodeses were revisions. The indications included posttraumatic arthritis (45), posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (18), failed prior ankle joint fusion (14), idiopathic disorders (12), hindfoot coalition (7), rheumatoid arthritis (3), and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (2). Fifteen of 101 patients (15%) smoked an average of 0.9 +/- 0.5 pack of cigarettes per day. RESULTS: Two of 101 joints did not fuse, resulting in an overall fusion rate of 98%. The average time to fusion was 12.3 +/- 3.4 weeks. The presence of a prior ankle fusion significantly prolonged the time to fusion of the subtalar joint (11.9 +/- 2.3 vs. 14.9 +/- 7.0, p = .003). Other factors, including smoking, revision surgery, patient age, and patient sex, did not affect time to fusion. The fixation screw was removed in 13 of 101 (13%) joints at an average of 8.8 +/- 0.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Using a single 7.0-mm lag screw across the posterior facet of the subtalar joint results in fusion of the subtalar joint in 98% of patients. A prior ankle arthrodesis delays the time to fusion of the subtalar joint by 3 weeks. This is a simple and reliable technique for achieving fusion of the subtalar joint.     

Subtalar versus triple arthrodesis after intra-articular calcaneal fractures

Depending upon initial treatment, between 2 and 30% of patients with a displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture require a secondary arthrodesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of subtalar versus triple arthrodesis on functional outcome. A total of 33 patients with 37 secondary arthrodeses (17 subtalar and 20 triple) with a median follow-up of 116 months were asked to complete questionnaires regarding disease-specific functional outcome (Maryland Foot Score, MFS), quality of life (SF-36) and overall satisfaction with the treatment (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS). Patient groups were comparable considering median age at fracture, initial treatment (conservative or operative), time to arthrodesis, median follow-up, and post-arthrodesis radiographic angles. The MFS score was similar after subtalar versus triple arthrodesis (59 vs. 56 points; P = 0.79). No statistically significant difference was found for the SF-36 (84 vs. 83 points; P = 0.67) and the VAS (5 vs. 6; P = 0.21). Smoking was statistically significantly associated with a non-union (χ² = 6.60, P = 0.017). The current study suggests that there is no significant difference in functional outcome between an in situ subtalar or triple arthrodesis as a salvage technique for symptomatic arthrosis after an intra-articular calcaneal fracture. Smoking is a risk factor for non-union.     

Subtalar arthrodesis for flexible hindfoot deformities in children

Flexible hindfoot valgus deformities in 16 patients (20 feet) with poliomyelitis and 10 patients (16 feet) with cerebral palsy were surgically treated by a modified Dennyson-Fulford operation using a fibular dowel and a screw. The correction achieved was assessed clinically and radiologically after a mean follow-up of 3.6 years. Overall good results were achieved in 86%. There were no cases of under- or over-correction, pseudarthrosis or screw failure. The procedure is suitable even for spastic planovalgus deformities. Complications related to screw position can be avoided by following the recommendations given here. Use of fluoroscopy and cannulated screws facilitate quick and easy completion of the procedure. Received: 9 August 1996     

Subtalar arthrodesis for complications of intra-articular calcaneal fractures

Eighty six subtalar arthrodeses performed between 1985 and 1996 for complications associated with intra-articular calcaneal fractures were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into three Groups: (I) 59 patients with calcaneal malunions (II) 13 patients with failed open reduction and internal fixation, and (III) eight patients undergoing open reductions and primary fusion for highly comminuted fractures. In each scenario, internal fixation was achieved with cancellous lag screws. Bone graft material consisted of either autogenous iliac crest graft, local graft obtained from the lateral wall exostectomy of the malunion, or freeze-dried cancellous allograft. Fusions in Groups II and III were performed in situ. Fusions in Group I were performed either in situ or utilizing a variety of reconstructive procedures depending upon the type of malunion encountered. Eighty three of the 86 fusion attempts were successful following the initial operations for a union rate of 96%. Fusion rates were similar regardless of the graft material used. Complications included four varus malunions, four cases of osteomyelitis, and two cases of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. A statistically significant shorter hospital stay was found for patients not undergoing iliac crest bone graft procedures. Eighty patients with at least two year follow up achieved a mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score of 75.0. Scores were similar for all three groups and for the various types of reconstructive procedures used. No correlation was found between postoperative talar declination angle and the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score. Worker's compensation patients tended to have a poorer clinical outcome.     

Results of calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis

BackgroundOne powerful method of reconstructing an adult acquired flatfoot deformity is a calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis. We performed a retrospective review of a small series of patients who underwent a calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis with a femoral head allograft.Materials and methodsSixteen feet (14 patients) were identified with an average follow up of 23 months (8–39 months) and an average age of 43 years (16–60 years). A calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis was performed with a femoral head allograft, secured with a 3 hole 1/3 tubular plate with 7 of the grafts being supplemented with platelet rich plasma (PRP). Patients were kept non-weight bearing for 6 weeks with an additional 6 weeks in a walking cast or boot. Plain radiographs and if necessary a CT or MRI were used to evaluate for union.ResultsSeven of the 16 feet developed a nonunion. Five of 9 patients without PRP developed a nonunion vs 2 of 7 patients where PRP was used.ConclusionDue to the unacceptably high complication rate with this procedure, the authors have abandoned this procedure. If an allograft is to be used for a calcaneocuboid arthrodesis, the authors strongly recommend using rigid locking fixation with a longer period of protected immobilization.