Outcome of ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy for varicose veins: medium-term results assessed by ultrasound surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate medium-term success after a technique for ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy for superficial chronic venous disease. DESIGN: A prospective study in a single unit with ultrasound surveillance after treatment. MATERIALS: Results after 1189 treatment sessions for 807 venous saphenous veins and related tributaries or non-saphenous tributaries in 489 patients. METHODS: Univariate life table analysis determined primary and secondary success rates. Multivariate Cox regression analysis detected covariates that affected outcome. RESULTS: Primary and secondary success rates at 36 months for all veins were 52.4% (95%CI 46-58%) and 76.8% (95%CI 71-82%). Cox regression analysis for primary success for all veins showed significantly worse results for saphenous veins compared to tributaries (HR 3.72 - 95%CI 1.9 to 7.3). Cox regression for all saphenous veins showed independently worse results for patients less than 40 years age (HR 2.16 - 95%CI 1.27-3.66), small compared to great saphenous veins (HR 1.58 - 95%CI 1.11-2.24), veins greater than 6mm diameter compared to smaller veins (HR 2.22 - 95%CI 1.40-3.50), liquid compared to foam sclerotherapy (HR 2.20 - 95%CI 1.28-3.78), lower volumes of sclerosant compared to volumes greater than 12 ml (HR 0.51 - 95%CI 0.33-0.81) and highly diluted compared to concentrated sclerosant (HR 2.05 - 95%CI 1.21-3.46) with worse results using highly diluted or undiluted 3% sclerosant compared to a 1.5% concentration. There were no significant differences for primary success for saphenous veins for date of procedure, sex, side, primary or recurrent varicose veins, or commercial type of sclerosant. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy gives satisfactory results if it is accepted that treatment may need to be repeated to achieve secondary success. Results provide a basis for further research to explore factors that might affect outcome. Younger patients with larger diameter saphenous veins may warrant alternative forms of treatment, particularly for small saphenous reflux.     

Endovenous saphenous ablation corrects the hemodynamic abnormality in patients with CEAP clinical class 3-6 CVI due to superficial reflux

This investigation was designed to determine whether minimally invasive radiofrequency or laser ablation of the saphenous vein corrects the hemodynamic impact and clinical symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) in CEAP clinical class 3-6 patients with superficial venous reflux. Patients with CEAP clinical class 3-6 CVI were evaluated with duplex ultrasound and air plethysmography (APG) to determine anatomic and hemodynamic venous abnormalities. Patients with an abnormal (>2 mL/second) venous filling index (VFI) and superficial venous reflux were included in this study. Saphenous ablation was performed utilizing radiofrequency (RF) or endovenous laser treatment (EVLT). Patients were reexamined within 3 months of ablation with duplex to determine anatomic success of the procedure, and with repeat APG to determine the degree of hemodynamic improvement. Venous clinical severity scores (VCSS) were determined before and after saphenous ablation. Eighty-nine limbs in 80 patients were treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (n = 58), or EVLT (n = 31). The average age of patients was 55 years and 66% were women. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics between the groups treated with RFA or EVLT. Postoperatively, 86% of limbs demonstrated near total closure of the saphenous vein to within 5 cm of the saphenofemoral junction. Eight percent remained open for 5-10 cm from the junction, and 6% demonstrated minimal or no saphenous ablation. The VFI improved significantly after ablation in both the RF and EVLT groups. Postablation, 78% of the 89 limbs were normal, with a VFI <2 mL/second, and 17% were moderately abnormal, between 2 and 4 mL/second. VCSS scores (11.5 +/-4.5 preablation) decreased significantly after ablation to 4.4 +/-2.3. Minimally invasive saphenous ablation, using either RFA or EVLT, corrects or significantly improved the hemodynamic abnormality and clinical symptoms associated with superficial venous reflux in more than 90% of cases. These techniques are useful for treatment of patients with more severe clinical classes of superficial CVI.     

Prevalence of varicose veins and venous anatomy in patients without truncal saphenous reflux.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and distribution of primary venous reflux in the lower limbs in patients without truncal saphenous reflux. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand and seven hundred and twelve patients with suspected venous disease were examined by duplex ultrasonography. Seven hundred and thirty-five patients had primary varicose veins with competent saphenous trunks. Limbs with truncal saphenous reflux, deep vein reflux or obstruction, previous injection sclerotherapy or vein surgery, arterial disease and inflammation of non-venous origin were excluded from further consideration. The CEAP classification system was used for clinical staging. Systematic duplex ultrasound examination was undertaken to assess the distribution of incompetent saphenous tributaries. RESULTS: The prevalence of primary reflux with competent saphenous trunks was 43%. Reflux of GSV calf tributaries was the most common. The majority of the limbs (96%) belonged to chronic venous disease classes C1 and C2 of the CEAP classification. CONCLUSIONS: Superficial venous reflux causing varicose veins in the presence competent saphenous trunks is very prevalent in this series in contrast to other studies, presumably reflecting differing patient populations. Our data clearly show that varicose veins may occur in any vein and do not depend on truncal saphenous incompetence. Careful duplex ultrasound evaluation allows the pattern of venous reflux to be established in this group of patient ensuring appropriate management of varices.     

腔内激光联合手术治疗下肢静脉曲张的实验和临床研究

目的评价改进腔内激光(EVLT)联合手术治疗下肢静脉曲张的疗效。方法下肢静脉曲张90例116条下肢。按病因和病情采用3种手术治疗(1)A组临床表现明显的原发性下肢深静脉瓣膜功能不全24条下肢,作股浅静脉瓣膜包窄 大隐静脉高位结扎 EVLT 内镜下小腿内侧交通静脉离断术SEPS;(2)B组轻度原发性深静脉瓣膜功能不全26条下肢,作大隐静脉高位结扎 EVLT SEPS;(3)C组单纯性大隐静脉曲张66条下肢,作大隐静脉高位结扎 EVLT。结果平均随访20个月,3组患者均无复发,临床症状和体征消退或好转,溃疡均愈合。彩超检查示大隐静脉全程闭合,无血流信号,深静脉回流通畅。结论EVLT具有微创、安全、操作简单和疗效良好的优点,针对病因和病情联合不同手术治疗下肢静脉病变效果满意。     

Endovenous laser treatment combined with a surgical strategy for treatment of venous insufficiency in lower extremity: a report of 208 cases

BACKGROUND: We assessed the safety and efficacy of endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) of the saphenous vein combined with a surgical strategy for treatment of deep venous insufficiency in the lower extremity. METHODS: Two hundred thirty venous insufficiencies of the lower limbs in 208 consecutive patients (93 men and 115 women; mean age, 54.15 years) were treated with EVLT combined with surgical strategies. All patients were symptomatic. There were 84 limbs (36.5%) in C(2), 25 (10.9%) in C(3), 109 (47.7%) in C(4), 1 (0.4%) in C(5), and 9 (3.9%) in C(6) (CEAP), and Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome was present in 2 limbs. A total of 119 (51.7%) had perforator vein incompetence. Four therapeutic methods were included in this series according to symptoms, CEAP classification, and venous reflux. Simple EVLT was performed for 15 patients with only great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence or Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome in 19 lower limbs. EVLT combined with high ligation of the GSV and open ligation of perforators was performed for 5 patients with GSV and perforator incompetence in 5 lower limbs. EVLT was combined with high ligation of the GSV for 76 patients with GSV incompetence in 94 lower limbs. EVLT was combined with external banding of the first femoral venous valve and high ligation of the GSV for 112 patients with primary deep venous insufficiency in 112 lower limbs. All patients were followed up on an outpatient basis for physical examinations and postoperative complaints, and duplex ultrasonography was performed 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after operation. RESULTS: All patients tolerated the procedure well and returned to normal daily activities immediately, achieving a 100% immediate clinical success rate. Spot skin burn injuries occurred in 2 patients (1.0%). Paresthesia in the gaiter area was noted in 15 patients (7.2%). No postprocedural symptomatic deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism occurred. Three patients had local recurrent varicose veins in the calf (1.4%) during a 2- to 27-month follow-up (mean, 6.12 months). Postoperative clinical classes were significantly improved between 2 weeks and 24 months (P = .0001 at 2 weeks and 3 to 18 months; P = .0055 at 24 months compared with before operation), especially in preoperative C(2) to C(3) stage patients, who achieved complete amelioration. CONCLUSIONS: EVLT is a novel minimally invasive treatment with advantages of safety, effectiveness, and simplicity, and it leaves no scars. Its indications can be expanded by combining EVLT with surgical strategies.     

射频消融术与大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术治疗下肢静脉曲张的疗效比较

背景与目的 大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术（HSL）是治疗下肢静脉曲张的经典术式,但存在创伤较大、恢复时间较长、切口瘢痕不美观等缺点。随着医疗技术的进步,以腔内热消融治疗为代表的微创治疗技术蓬勃发展。本研究旨在对比射频消融术（RFA）与传统HSL治疗下肢静脉曲张的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2021年5月—2022年6月期间因原发性下肢静脉曲张于首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院血管外科行手术治疗的272例患者（298条肢体）的临床与随访资料,其中96例（100条肢体）行RFA治疗（RFA组）,176例（198条肢体）行HSL治疗（HSL组）。比较两组患者的术前临床特征、手术情况、并发症情况、临床表现-病因学-解剖学-病理生理学（CEAP）分级、静脉临床严重程度评分（VCSS）和慢性静脉功能不全问卷-14问版（CIVIQ-14）评分的变化情况。结果 两组技术成功率均为100%,术后3 d复查超声提示大隐静脉主干缺如/闭合率为100%。共完成随访265例（290条肢体）,平均随访时间（13.2±3.8）个月,随访期间超声提示大隐静脉主干缺如/闭合率为100%。两组患者的基本临床特征无明显差异（均P>0.05）;与HSL组比较,RFA组术中出血量（21.3 mL vs. 46.8 mL）、术后第1天疼痛评分（3.1 vs. 3.3）、总并发症发生率（25.5% vs. 38.0%）及皮肤感觉异常发生率（5.1% vs. 24.0%）均明显降低（均P<0.05）,RFA组的深静脉血栓形成发生率升高（5.1% vs. 0,P<0.05）;术后所有患者CEAP分级均较术前降级,RFA组81.7%的患肢降级为C0~C1级,HSL组83.9%的患肢降级为C0~C1级;所有患者的VCSS和CIVIQ-14评分均较术前有所改善,且HSL组的VCSS评分改善程度大于RFA组（均P<0.05）。结论 RFA短期疗效与HSL相当,相对于HSL而言,创伤更小、疼痛感更轻、并发症发生率更低,是一种下肢静脉曲张的有效治疗方案。     

Duplex ultrasonography scanning for chronic venous disease: Patterns of venous reflux

Purpose: Patterns of flow in superficial and deep veins and outward flow in medial calf perforators were studied by duplex ultrasonography scanning in 1653 lower limbs in 1114 consecutive patients. This study compares results in 776 limbs with primary uncomplicated varicose veins with those in 166 limbs with the complications of lipodermatosclerosis or past venous ulceration.Methods: Duplex scanning determined whether superficial and deep veins were occluded or showed reflux and whether outward flow occurred in medial calf perforators with calf muscle contraction.Results: Two proximal deep veins were occluded. When limbs with primary uncomplicated varicose veins, lipodermatosclerosis, or past ulceration were compared, superficial reflux alone was seen in 55%, 39%, and 38%, deep reflux alone was seen in 2%, 7%, and 8%, and combined superficial and deep reflux was seen in 18%, 34%, and 48%, respectively. Superficial reflux affected the long saphenous system alone in 58%, 57%, and 40%, the short saphenous system alone in 18%, 18%, and 26%, and both the long and short saphenous systems in 24%, 25%, and 34%, respectively. Limbs with ulceration more frequently showed superficial reflux (p < 0.05), and all limbs with complications more frequently showed short saphenous reflux (p < 0.05) and deep reflux (p < 0.01) specifically in the posterior tibial veins (p < 0.01). Outward flow was seen in medial calf perforators in 57%, 67%, and 66%, respectively; it occurred more frequently in all limbs with complications (p < 0.05). Isolated outward flow in perforators without superficial or deep reflux was seen in 10%, 10%, and 2%, respectively.Conclusions: Most limbs with complications had superficial reflux either alone or combined with deep reflux, and few had deep reflux alone. Reflux was more frequent in posterior tibial veins for limbs with complications compared with those with uncomplicated primary varicose veins. Outward flow in perforators was common in limbs with complications and with uncomplicated primary varicose veins, but isolated outward flow in perforators was uncommon. Treatment directed to the superficial veins alone may be sufficient for most patients with complications. (J VASC SURG 1995;21:605-12.)     

腔内激光治疗下肢静脉曲张106例报告

目的 探讨腔内激光治疗（endovenous laser treatment, EVLT）下肢静脉曲张疗效. 方法 2004年3月～2006年3月对106例118条下肢静脉曲张,单纯采用EVLT 72例78条患肢、EVLT联合大隐静脉高位结扎术19例21条患肢、EVLT联合点式切口剥脱严重曲张浅静脉15例19条患肢. 结果 7条患肢小腿皮肤轻度灼伤,10条患肢有明显血栓性浅静脉炎样表现,26条肢体沿大隐静脉行程皮下小片淤斑,5条患肢出现大腿内侧大片皮下淤斑.74例80条患肢随访3～12个月,平均6个月,1例隐神经损伤,1例术后1个月复发,余73例症状均消失,多普勒超声检查大隐静脉主干闭塞,无血管再通,深静脉无血栓形成. 结论 EVLT治疗下肢静脉曲张损伤小,术后恢复快,近期疗效满意.     

Patterns of Saphenous Venous Reflux in Women Presenting with Lower Extremity Telangiectasias

BACKGROUND: Telangiectasias have been treated with sclerotherapy without concomitant assessment or treatment of saphenous veins. OBJECTIVE: To clarify if ultrasound (US) mapping of saphenous veins is justifiable, this investigation determined prevalence of specific patterns of saphenous vein reflux in women with telangiectasias. METHODS: US mapping of the great and small saphenous veins (GSV, SSV) was performed in 1,740 extremities of 910 consecutive patients, mostly women (86%). A subgroup of 269 limbs of women with telangiectasias (CEAP C1 class) was included in this study. Patterns of GSV and SSV reflux were classified as perijunctional, proximal, distal, segmental, multisegmental, and diffuse. RESULTS: Reflux was detected in 125 extremities (46%): 5% had reflux in both the GSV and the SSV, 39% had GSV reflux, and 2% had SSV reflux. The most common pattern of GSV reflux was segmental (73%, 87/119). Prevalence of reflux was significantly greater in GSV versus SSV (p < .001). GSV segmental plus distal reflux (40%, 108/269) was significantly more prevalent than saphenofemoral junction or near junction reflux (4%, 11/269; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: US mapping of the GSV in women with telangiectasias is justifiable, even in asymptomatic extremities. Further research will determine if segmental reflux should be treated to avoid evolution to severe valvular insufficiency.     

Duplex Ultrasound Outcomes Following Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy of Symptomatic Primary Great Saphenous Varicose Veins

ObjectivesTo describe duplex ultrasound (DUS) outcomes 12 months following ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) of primary great saphenous varicose veins (GSVV).MethodsA consecutive series of UK National Health Service patients underwent serial DUS examinations following UGFS with 3% sodium tetradecyl sulphate for symptomatic primary GSVV.Results344 treated legs (CEAP C_2/3 237, C₄ 72, C₅ 14, C₆ 21) belonging to 278 patients (103 male) of median age 57 (range 21–89) years were enrolled between November 2004 and May 2007. The median volume of foam used was 10 (range 2–16) ml. Above-knee (AK) and below-knee (BK) GSV reflux was present in 333 (96.8%) and 308 (89.5%) legs respectively prior to treatment. AK and BK-GSV reflux was completely eradicated by a single session of UGFS in 323 (97.0%) and 294 (95.5%) legs respectively; and by two sessions of UGFS in 329 (98.8%) and 304 (98.7%) legs respectively. In those legs where GSV reflux had been eradicated, recanalisation occurred in 18/286 (6.3%) AK and 23/259 (8.9%) BK-GSV segments after 12 months follow-up.ConclusionsA single session of UGFS can eradicate reflux in the AK and BK-GSV in over 95% of patients with symptomatic primary GSVV. Recanalisation at 12 months is superior to that reported after surgery and similar to that observed following other minimally invasive techniques.     

Single-visit endovenous laser treatment and tributary procedures for symptomatic great saphenous varicose veins

Introduction

Endovenous ablation of saphenous varicose veins has decreased morbidity and recovery time compared with open surgery. This study assessed the outcome and mid-term patient satisfaction of single-visit endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) alone, EVLT combined with phlebectomies and endovenous chemical ablation.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients (n=91) in 2008–2009 who underwent single-visit day-case EVLT using local anaesthesia under a single surgeon. Postoperative venous ultrasonography at 2 and 14 months was reviewed. A telephone questionnaire was carried out to assess recurrence of symptoms and quality of life at 42 months.

Results

Overall, 124 limbs underwent day-case EVLT under local anaesthesia using an 810nm diode laser at a continuous setting of 14W. Forty-eight of these underwent EVLT alone while fifty underwent EVLT with phlebectomies and twenty-six underwent EVLT with endovenous chemical ablation. Ninety-one per cent of limbs underwent two-month postoperative imaging. All had satisfactory great saphenous vein (GSV) ablation (anterior thigh vein patency: n=1). The majority (84%) of limbs underwent 14-month imaging with a 98% GSV ablation rate. Three per cent had anterior thigh vein and saphenofemoral junction incompetence. Recurrence of GSV patency and reflux was <1%. The response rate to the questionnaire was 60%: 95% of respondents confirmed improvement following treatment, 62% remained symptom free at 42 months while 65% of patients with a return of symptoms deemed them mild. The questionnaire was scored out of 56 for symptoms and quality of life. Those with symptoms scored significantly higher.

Conclusions

At 42 months, the majority of limbs remained asymptomatic. The short-term GSV ablation rates were excellent. Overall mid-term review of patients has shown a well received single-visit service with concomitant phlebectomy or endovenous ablation, and good ablation and patient satisfaction rates.     

腔内激光联合手术治疗下肢静脉曲张的评价

目的 评价腔内激光(EVLT)联合手术治疗下肢静脉曲张的疗效.方法 下肢静脉曲张172例,198条下肢.按不同病因分为3组,采用EVLT 相应手术方法治疗:①A组:原发性下肢深静脉瓣膜功能不全45条患肢,行股浅静脉瓣膜包窄 EVLT 内镜下小腿内侧功能不全交通静脉离断术(SEPS);②B组:轻度原发性深静脉瓣膜功能不全55条下肢,行EVLT SEPS;③C组:单纯性大隐静脉曲张,98条下肢,行EVLT.结果 随访2～44个月,平均32个月,5例有曲张静脉复发,再次行EVLT后未再复发;其余167例症状消退或明显好转,溃疡均愈合,彩超示大隐静脉全程闭合,深静脉通畅.结论 EVLT具有微创、安全、易于操作的特点,联合手术治疗下肢静脉曲张的效果满意.     

射频消融治疗大隐静脉曲张的近期有效性及安全性

目的观察射频消融(RFA)治疗大隐静脉曲张的近期有效性及安全性。方法回顾性分析接受超声引导下RFA治疗的17例大隐静脉曲张患者(26条患肢)术前1周、术后即刻及术后1、3、6个月临床资料。结果 26条患肢中,术后即刻及术后1、3、6个月大隐静脉闭塞率均为100%(26/26)。术后3、6个月患肢活动能力较术前1周好转(P均0.05),术后6个月疼痛程度较术前1周缓解(P0.05)。术后1、3、6个月患肢临床-病因-解剖-病理生理(CEAP)临床分级及修订版静脉临床严重程度评分(rVCSS)与术前1周比较分级均降低(P均0.01)。术后6个月内7条患肢发生皮下条索僵硬静脉,1条隐股点不适,3条皮下出血。结论 RFA治疗大隐静脉曲张近期疗效好,且并发症少。     

The effect of ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of incompetent perforator veins on venous clinical severity and disability scores

PURPOSE: Current techniques to treat venous ulcerations and patients with severe lipodermatosclerosis include the elimination of incompetent perforator veins by open surgical ligation and division or by subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery. An alternative and less invasive means to obliterate perforator veins is ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy (UGS). We hypothesize that UGS is a clinically effective means of eliminating perforator veins and results in improvement of the clinical state (scores) without the complications associated with other more invasive methods. METHODS: Between January 2000 and March 2004, UGS was used to treat chronic venous insufficiency in 80 limbs of 68 patients. This was a clinical series of patients who had perforator incompetence and no previous surgery for venous disease < or = 2 years of their UGS procedure. Most had perforator disease without coexisting axial reflux of the saphenous or deep venous systems. Color flow duplex scanning was used to identify incompetent perforator veins in the calf, and duplex guidance was used to inject each perforator with the liquid sclerosant sodium morrhuate (5%). Patients were restudied by duplex scanning up to 5 years after treatment. Clinical results were determined by Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Venous Disability Score (VDS) before and after treatment. RESULTS: Of the 80 limbs treated with UGS, 98% of incompetent perforators were successfully obliterated at the time of treatment, and 75% of limbs showed persistent occlusion of perforators and remained clinically improved with a mean follow-up of 20.1 months. According to the CEAP classification, there were 46.2% with limb ulceration or C6, 1.2% C5, 28.7% C4, 17.5% C3, and 6.2% C2 with pain isolated to the site of the perforator(s). Of those who returned for follow-up, the VCSSs changed from a median of 8 before treatment (95% confidence interval [CI], 3 to 15) to a median of 2 after treatment (95% CI, 0 to 7) (P < .01). Likewise, VDSs dropped from a median of 4 before treatment (95% CI, 1 to 3) to 1 after treatment (95% CI, 0 to 2) (P < .01). There were no cases of deep vein thrombosis involving the deep vein adjacent to the perforator injected. One patient had skin complications with skin necrosis. Perforator recurrence was found more frequently in those with ulcerations than those without. CONCLUSION: UGS is an effective and durable method of eliminating incompetent perforator veins and results in significant reduction of symptoms and signs as determined by venous clinical scores. As an alternative to open interruption or subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery, UGS may lead to fewer skin and wound healing complications. Perforator recurrence occurs particularly in those with ulcerations, and therefore, surveillance duplex scanning after UGS and repeat injections may be needed.     

Patterns of saphenous reflux in women with primary varicose veins

OBJECTIVE: Varicose veins have been linked to great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux and in particular, with reflux at the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ). Early stages of disease, however, may be associated with limited, localized reflux in segments of the GSV and/or small saphenous vein (SSV). Ultrasound mapping of saphenous veins was performed to determine patterns of GSV and SSV reflux in women with simple, primary varicose veins. METHODS: Ultrasound mapping was performed prospectively in 590 extremities of 326 women with varicose veins (CEAP C 2 class) but without edema, skin changes, or ulcers (C 3 to C 6 ). Average age was 42 +/- 13 (SD) years (range, 8 to 87). Patterns of GSV and SSV reflux, obtained in the upright position, were classified as I: perijunctional, originating from the SFJ or saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ) tributaries into the GSV or SSV; II: proximal, from the SFJ or SPJ to a tributary or perforating vein above the level of the malleoli; III: distal, from a tributary or perforating vein to the paramalleolar GSV or SSV; IV: segmental, from a tributary or perforating vein to another tributary or perforating vein above the malleoli; V; multisegmental, if two or more distinct refluxing segments were detected; and VI: diffused, involving the entire GSV or SSV from the SFJ or SPJ to the malleoli. RESULTS: Reflux was detected in 472 extremities (80%): 100 (17%) had reflux in both the GSV and SSV, 353 (60%) had GSV reflux only, and 19 (3%) had SSV reflux only, for a total prevalence of 77% at the GSV and 20% at the SSV. The most common pattern of GSV reflux was segmental (types IV and V) in 342 (58%) of 590; either one segment in 213 (36%) or more than one segment with competent SFJ in 99 (17%), or incompetent SFJ in 30 (5%), followed by distal GSV reflux (type III) in 65 (11%), proximal GSV reflux (type II) in 32 (5%), diffused throughout the entire GSV (type VI) in 10 (2%), and perijunctional (type I) in 4 (<1%). GSV refluxing segments were noted in the SFJ in 72 (12%) and in the thigh in 220 (37%), and leg (or both) in 345 (58%). CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of reflux justifies ultrasound mapping of the saphenous veins in women with primary varicose veins. Correction of SFJ reflux, however, may be needed in 相似文献   

Prospective randomised comparative study of visual foam sclerotherapy alone or in combination with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for treatment of superficial venous insufficiency: preliminary report

ObjectiveThe aim of the study is to compare ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS: injection of foam sclerosant under ultrasound guidance) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) combined with visual foam sclerotherapy (VFS: injection of foam sclerosant under visual control) for varicose tributary veins and VFS alone in the treatment of GSV reflux.Design and methodsA total of 133 limbs in 97 patients with GSV reflux were randomised to receive either VFS alone or VFS combined with UGFS. In both groups, 1% polidocanol foam was used. Assessments included duplex ultrasonography, evaluation of Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSS) and CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, and pathophysiologic) scores. Ultrasonographic inspection of the foam in the GSV was carried out during 5 min before compression was applied. The primary ‘end’ point of the study was obliteration of the GSV at 6 months.ResultsA total of 51 limbs in 48 patients were treated with UGFS + VFS and the remaining 52 limbs in 49 patients were treated with VFS alone. There were no significant inter-group differences in patient age, male: female ratio, height, weight, body mass index, CEAP clinical scores or VCSS. The GSV diameter was 6.0 ± 1.7 mm (median ± interquartile range) in the UGFS + VFS group and 5.7 ± 1.6 mm in the VFS group (p = 0.419). The mean injected volume of foam for varicose tributary veins was 4 ± 2 ml in the UGFS + VFS group and 6 ± 2 ml in the VFS group, a significantly higher amount of foam being used in the latter (p < 0.001). However, the mean total amount of foam was greater in limbs treated with UFGS + VFS than in those treated with VFS alone (p = 0.017). Ultrasonographic inspection revealed complete vasospasm of the GSV in 37 (72.5%) limbs in the UGFS + VFS group and 29 (55.8%) in the VFS group during sclerotherapy (p = 0.097). At 6-month follow-up, complete occlusion was found in 23 limbs (45.1%) treated with UGFS + VFS and in 22 limbs (42.3%) treated with VFS. The difference between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.775). Reflux was absent in 30 limbs (58.8%) treated with UGFS + VFS and in 37 (71.2%) treated with VFS (p = 0.190). There was no inter-group difference in post-treatment VCSS (p = 0.223).ConclusionsThese results show that UGFS + VFS and VFS are equally effective for the treatment of GSV reflux, despite the lower volume of foam used for VFS alone.     

Prevalence, anatomic patterns, valvular competence, and clinical significance of the Giacomini vein

OBJECTIVE: Coursing the posterior thigh as a tributary or trunk projection of the small saphenous vein (SSV), the Giacomini vein's clinical significance in chronic venous disease (CVD) remains undetermined. This cross-sectional controlled study examined the prevalence, anatomy, competency status, and clinical significance of the Giacomini vein across the clinical spectrum of CVD in relation to the SSV termination. METHODS: One hundred eighty-nine consecutive subjects (301 limbs) with suspected CVD (109 men, 80 women; age, 18-87 years [median, 61 years]) underwent examination, clinical class (CEAP) stratification, and duplex ultrasound determination of the sites and extent of reflux >0.5 sec) and Giacomini vein's anatomy. RESULTS: A Giacomini vein was found in 70.4% of limbs (212 of 301; 95% confidence interval, 65%-75.6%). Extent, pattern, and sites of reflux in all named superficial and deep veins were evenly distributed in limbs with and without a Giacomini vein; perforator vein incompetence in thigh and calf was also balanced (all, P > .2). Giacomini vein had no effect ( P > .2) on SSV termination anatomy, displaying a similar prevalence in classes C(0-6) . In 212 limbs, either as a tributary or trunk projection of the SSV, the Giacomini vein ascended subfascially (n = 210) to the lower (8%; n = 17), middle (47.6%; n = 101), or upper (44.3%; n = 94) thigh, and terminated at the deep system (45.3%; n = 96) and/or perforated the fascia (64.2%; n = 136), to join the superficial system. Giacomini vein morphology was not affected by the SSV termination anatomy and CEAP clinical class. Incompetence was detected less often (P < .001) in the Giacomini vein (4.7%; n = 10 of 212) than in the saphenous trunks cumulatively (53.3%; n = 113 of 212). Yet the odds ratio of Giacomini incompetence was 11.94 (7 of 33 over 3 of 169) in the presence of SSV reflux, and 11.67 (6 of 23 over 4 of 179) when both the great saphenous vein (proximal, proximal plus distal) and SSV were incompetent. CONCLUSION: Found in more than two thirds of limbs, the Giacomini vein has a complex anatomy that is linked vastly to the deep or superficial veins of the posteromedial thigh, but is unaffected by the anatomy of SSV termination and CEAP clinical class. Its presence proved insignificant to the extent, pattern, sites, and clinical severity of venous incompetence, yet the Giacomini vein was far less often susceptible to reflux than the saphenous trunks were. Routine Giacomini vein investigation is not justified in view of these findings. Investigation could be considered selectively in limbs with SSV incompetence, with or without great saphenous vein incompetence, supported by the high odds of concomitant Giacomini vein reflux.     

Innovative Treatments in Chronic Venous Insufficiency: Endovenous Laser Ablation of Perforating Veins: A Prospective Short-term Analysis of 58 Cases

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of endovenous laser ablation of incompetent perforating veins.Study designProspective cohort study.PatientsA total of 58 perforating veins in 33 limbs of 28 patients were treated between March 2008 and February 2009 in an outpatient clinic setting. The average age was 65 years (range 30–81 years); 64% female; CEAP clinical stage C4 (67%), C5 (17%) and C6 (16%) (Clinica, Etiology, Anatomy and Pathophysiology, CEAP).MethodsAll patients underwent a standardised clinical examination and duplex ultrasonography. Guided by duplex ultrasonography, the perforating veins were cannulated percutaneously and tumescent local anaesthesia was given. An 810-nm diode laser was used to deliver 14 W power. Mean total energy delivered was 187 (range 87–325) J. Three months post-treatment, all patients underwent a further duplex ultrasound examination, to determine the treatment outcome.ResultsOcclusion of the perforating veins was achieved after 3 months in 78% of the cases. In the CEAP C6 group, four of five ulcers had healed after 6 weeks. No serious complications, including deep venous thrombosis, were encountered.ConclusionsEndovenous laser therapy for treating incompetent perforating veins is a safe and technically feasible technique. The initial occlusion rate is acceptable.     

Valvular incompetence in superficial, deep and perforator veins of limbs with varicose veins

Venous valvular incompetence was investigated with Doppler technique in 296 limbs with untreated primary varicose veins. Partial or complete insufficiency of the long saphenous vein was found in 95%. Six patterns of incompetence of this vein could be distinguished. Insufficiency of the short saphenous vein was present in 15% of the limbs and perforator incompetence in 45%. Femoral and/or popliteal vein reflux was found in 20% of the limbs. In eight limbs (2.7%) with verified primary deep venous insufficiency there was a moderate or severe degree of femoral and popliteal venous reflux. Skin changes secondary to the venous disease were present in 18% of the limbs, mainly those with incompetence of perforator and long saphenous veins. Doppler investigation of varicose limbs give valuable information and can be recommended as a standard pre-treatment test.     

Primary varicose veins: topographic and hemodynamic correlations

This study was conducted to correlate the clinical presentations of uncomplicated primary varicose veins with the topographic and anatomic source of reflux (escape points). One-hundred sixty-three patients with primary varicose veins (144 females, 19 males; 96 unilateral, 67 bilateral) in 230 involved limbs were examined. The origin and extent of venous reflux was traced with Doppler ultrasound. Three distinct groups were recognized. Group I. Typical saphenous varicosities with junctional escapes occurred in 164 (71.3%). Sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ) incompetence in 147, and sapheno-popliteal junction (SPJ) incompetence in 17 limbs. Group II. Atypical saphenous varicosities with non-junctional escapes occurred in 51 (22.17%) limbs. In 5 limbs, no escape was detected. Twenty-two limbs had escapes localized in the main perforators: mid-thigh perforator 17, upper calf 2, distal ankle in 3. Twenty-four limbs had their escapes in the auxiliary perforators: abdomino-pelvic 17, and circumflex iliac/external epigastric, 7 limbs. Group III. Non saphenous (lateral venous system) varicosities occurred in 15 (6.52%) limbs. Based on physical examination alone, 55 limbs would possibly have undergone unnecessary ankle to groin stripping and 83 limbs an unnecessary SFJ ligation. Doppler US is an essential diagnostic tool that can accurately map the origin and extent of the venous reflux. The obtained hemodynamic information will permit more selective, multimodal therapy and avoid the indiscriminate, often unnecessary stripping of the entire saphenous system in all cases of primary varicose veins.