Role of Vigabatrin and Lamotrigine in Treatment of Childhood Epileptic Syndromes

Summary: Purpose: Vigabatrin (VGB) and lamotrigine (LTG) are two new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with different mechanisms of action for treatment of refractory epilepsies. Previous reports have indicated efficacy of both drugs in a number of epileptic syndromes.
Methods: We compared these new AEDs drugs to determine their respective efficacy against different types of epileptic syndrome and to develop a rational approach to their use. We reviewed the charts of 105 children, with partial and generalized epilepsies.
Results: VGB was to be significantly more effective in children with partial epilepsies, and LTG was more effective in those with generalized epilepsies.
Conclusions: VGB and LTG have different therapeutic profiles. Combination treatment with the two drugs may represent rational polytherapy for patients with epilepsy resistant to treatment with either drug alone or as add-on to other AED treatment.     

The Long-Term Use of Gabapentin, Lamotrigine, and Vigabatrin in Patients with Chronic Epilepsy

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term retention of gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), and vigabatrin (VGB) by patients with chronic epilepsy and the reasons for treatment discontinuation. To assess the likelihood of seizure freedom, seizure-related injury/hospital admission and mortality after these drugs were commenced. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-records survey in five tertiary referral epilepsy centres in the U.K. The retention times on treatment (from initiation to discontinuation) for the different antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were compared by using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression. Incidences of seizure freedom and seizure-related injury/hospital admissions and standardised mortality ratios were calculated. RESULTS: There were 1,375 patients with chronic epilepsy included; 361 were taking GBP, 1,050 LTG, and 713 VGB. The retention of GBP, LTG, or VGB was <40% at 6 years. Fewer than 4% of patients become seizure free while taking one of the drugs. There was no reduction in mortality or seizure-related injury/admission. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of these new AEDs on chronic epilepsy can be described only as modest. This view may be revised, however, as more experience is gained with new drugs in previously untreated patients.     

An Overview of the Efficacy and Tolerability of New Antiepileptic Drugs

Summary: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of recently developed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), a systematic review of placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the AEDs as add-on therapy in refractory partial epilepsy was conducted. Two or more RCTs meeting our inclusion criteria were found for gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), vigabatrin (VGB), and zonisamide (ZNS). The outcome selected for estimation of efficacy was the proportion of patients experiencing a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. Tolerability was estimated on the basis of rates of patient withdrawal from study for any reason. Efficacy and tolerability odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each measure were generated for each trial included in the analysis, and overall efficacy and tolerability ORs were calculated for each AED across all trials and drug dosages evaluated. Because 95% CIs for both efficacy and tolerability overlapped for the six drugs, conclusive evidence of between-drug differences in effectiveness or safety were not obtained from the analysis. However, the data suggest that the drug with the highest OR for efficacy (TPM) may be approximately twice as effective as the AED with the lowest OR for efficacy (GBP), and that the treatment that appears to most frequently cause withdrawal (ZNS) may be about four times more likely to do so that the AED with the lowest withdrawal rate (LTG). RCTs comparing newer AEDs with the older standard drugs and with each other are needed to further evaluate their relative utility.     

The effect of lamotrigine on the EEGs of children and adolescents with epilepsy

Lamotrigine (LTG) is one of the newer-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with broad-spectrum efficacy against a variety of seizures and epileptic syndromes. We retrospectively evaluated the effects of LTG as add-on therapy on EEGs of children and adolescents. The EEGs of 53 patients (mean age: 12.5 years) with primarily pharmacoresistant epilepsy were reviewed prior to and after LTG add-on therapy. Multiple seizure types were seen in 25, generalized seizures in 15, and complex partial seizures in 13 of the patients. Preceding LTG therapy, the baseline EEG was abnormal because of slow background in 60.3% and localized spikes in 35.8%, generalized spikes in 28.3%, or both in 24.5%. The EEG analysis during the 2-year follow-up period showed improvement in the background in 21.9%, interictal activity in 37.8%, and ictal pattern in 41.1% of the EEG recordings. Overall, LTG resulted in improvement in electrographic features which paralleled the clinical improvement.     

Lamotrigine

Summary: Lamotrigine (LTG) is a novel antiepileptic drug (AED) with a spectrum of activity in animal models of epilepsy similar to that of phenytoin and carbam-azepine. In some models it appears to have a broader spectrum and better tolerability than these agents, however. One mechanism of action of LTG is the marked inhibition of release of the excitatory neurotransmitters glutamate and aspartate under conditions of sustained repetitive firing. LTG appears to do this by blocking voltage-sensitive sodium channels and has no direct effect on JV-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. In clinical trials as add-on therapy in medically refractory partial seizure patients, LTG has consistently produced a 50% reduction in seizure frequency in 25–34% of subjects. LTG is well tolerated, even in the add-on situation. In part, this appears to be related to positive behavioral effects. Desirable pharmacologic properties of LTG include low protein binding (55%), an absence of enzyme induction, and linear pharmacokinetics. The most significant adverse effect is rash, leading to a withdrawal rate of 2% of patient exposures in clinical trials.     

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Lamotrigine in Treatment-Resistant Generalised Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose : Lamotrigine (LTG) is recognised as effective add-on therapy for focal epilepsies, but this is the first double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in treatmentresistant generalised epilepsy.
Methods: The study consisted of 2 × 8-week treatment periods followed by a 4-week washout period. Patients received doses of either 75 or 150 mg daily, depending on their concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Long-term continuation was offered at the end of the study with open-label LTG.
Results: Five centres in Australia recruited 26 patients who were having absence, myoclonic, or generalized tonic-clonic seizures or a combination of these. Twenty-two patients completed the study. There was a significant reduction in frequency of both tonic-clonic and absence seizure types with LTG. A 250% decrease in seizures was observed for tonic-clonic seizures in 50% of cases and for absence seizures in 33% of evaluable cases. Rash was the only adverse effect causing discontinuation. Twenty-three of 26 opted for open-label LTG, with 20 still receiving LTG for a mean of 26 months. In these 20, 80% had 250% seizure reduction and five (25%) were seizure free.
Conclusions: This study shows that LTG is effective add-on therapy in patients with refractory generalised epilepsies. Statistically significant reduction in seizures in both absence and tonic-clonic seizure types was seen even with low doses of LTG.     

The New Antiepileptic Drugs and Women: Efficacy, Reproductive Health, Pregnancy, and Fetal Outcome

Summary: As new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) become available, physicians will define their appropriate use in particular patient populations. For women, the issues in clude gender-specific efficacy and tolerability, including the impact of the AED on reproductive health. Women with epilepsy who are treated with established AEDs ap pear to be at risk for compromised bone health, for dis turbances in fertility, menstrual cyclicity, ovulatory func tion, and sexuality and, with some AEDs, for failure of hormonal contraception. Finally, pregnancy outcome may be adversely affected by the established AEDs, all of which are human teratogens. Felbamate (FBM), gabap-entin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OCBZ), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), and vigabatrin (VGB) were reviewed. The preclinical development pro cess had not addressed all the issues of concern to women. Although gender-specific efficacy is routinely evaluated, impact on reproductive health is not. FBM, GBP, LTG, TGB, TPM, and VGB have similar efficacy in women and men. It is not known whether the new AEDs will affect bone health, fertility, the menstrual cycle, and sexuality. FBM, GBP, LTG, TGB, and probably VGB do not interfere with hormonal contraception. Whether these new AEDs are good choices for the pregnant woman with epilepsy awaits further experience in human pregnancy. However, animal reproductive toxicology studies appear promising. The limited number of human pregnancy ex posures do not, thus far, signal a significant number or particular type of adverse outcomes. However, only with improved postmarketing surveillance can essential infor mation about teratogenic effects be acquired in an accept ably short time.     

Utility of the Lethargic (lh/lh) Mouse Model of Absence Seizures in Predicting the Effects of Lamotrigine,Vigabatrin, Tiagabine,Gabapentin, and Topiramate Against Human Absence Seizures

Summary: Purpose: Traditional methods of preclinical screening have predicted the effects of a putative antiepi-leptic drug (AED) against human absence seizures by testing its efficacy against clonic seizures in the high-dose pen-tylenetetrazole (PTZ) model. This high-dose PTZ model correctly predicted the efficacy of ethosuximide (ESM), benzodiazepines, and valproate (VPA) and the lack of efficacy of phenytoin (PHT) and carbamazepine (CBZ). However, the high-dose PTZ model erred in predictions for (a) phenobarbital (PB) (PTZ: efficacy; human: noneffi-cacy); (b) lamotrigine (LTG) (PTZ nonefficacy; human: efficacy); (c) vigabatrin (VGB) (PTZ: nonefficacy; human: proabsence effect); and (d) tiagabine (TGB) (PTZ efficacy; human: possibleproabsence). It also appears to have erred in predictions for gabapentin (GBP) (PTZ efficacy) and topiramate (TPM) (PTZ: efficacy). Because the lh/lh genetic model of absence seizures correctly predicted effects of ESM, clonazepam, VPA, PHT, CBZ, and PB against human absence seizures, we performed this study to test the predictive utility of the lWZh model for LTG, VGB, TGB, GBP, and TPM. Methods: Bipolar recording electrodes were implanted bilaterally into frontal neocortex of 8–week-old male lWZh mice. With the exception of VGB, vehicle or drugs were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) on alternating days, and an EEG was used to record effects on seizure frequency. With VGB, vehicle was administered i.p. on day 1, and gradually increasing doses of VGB were administered on successive days. Drug and vehicle effects were compared in corresponding lfi-min epochs of the 150–min period after administration. Results: LTG (4.8–144 μmol/kg) significantly (p < 0.04) reduced seizure frequency (by 6.5%) compared with vehicle. In contrast, VGB (0.35–11 mmol/kg) and TGB (0.27–27 μmol/kg) significantly increased seizure frequency (300– 700%) and seizure duration (1,700–1,800%; p ≤ 0.001). GBP (18μmol/kg to 1.8 mmol/kg) and TPM (8.9–29.5 pmol/kg) had no significant effect on seizure frequency. Conclusions: In contrast to the high-dose PTZ model, the lh/lh model correctly predicted the antiabsence effect of LTG, the possible proabsence effects of VGB and TGB, and the lack of effect of GBP and TPM. The lWlh model appears to be superior to the high-dose PTZ model in predicting efficacy of putative AEDs against human absence seizures.     

Antiepileptic Drug Mechanisms of Action

Summary: Established antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) decrease membrane excitability by interacting with neurotransmitter receptors or ion channels. AEDs developed before 1980 appear to act on sodium channels, γ-ami-nobutyric acid type A (GABA_A) receptors, or calcium channels. Benzodiazepines and barbiturates enhance GABA_A receptor-mediated inhibition. Phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), and possibly valproate (VPA) decrease high-frequency repetitive firing of action potentials by enhancing sodium-channel inactivation. Ethosuximide (ESM) and VPA reduce a low threshold (T-type) calcium-channel current. The mechanisms of action of the new AEDs are not fully established. Gabapentin (GBP) binds to a high-affinity site on neuronal membranes in a restricted regional distribution of the central nervous system. This binding site may be related to a possible active transport process of GBP into neurons; however, this has not been proven, and the mechanism of action of GBP remains uncertain. Lamotrigine (LTG) decreases sustained high-frequency repetitive firing of voltage-dependent sodium action potentials that may result in a preferential decreased release of presynaptic glutamate. The mechanism of action of oxcarbazepine (OCBZ) is not known; however, its similarity in structure and clinical efficacy to CBZ suggests that its mechanism of action may involve inhibition of sustained high-frequency repetitive firing of voltage-dependent sodium action potentials. Vigabatrin (VGB) irreversibly inhibits GABA transaminase, the enzyme that degrades GABA, thereby producing greater available pools of presynaptic GABA for release in central synapses. Increased activity of GABA at postsynaptic receptors may underlie the clinical efficacy of VGB.     

Stiripentol: efficacy and tolerability in children with epilepsy

PURPOSE: Stiripentol (STP) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) that inhibits cytochrome P450, resulting in increased plasma concentrations of concomitant AEDs. The efficacy and tolerability of STP as an add-on therapy in children were assessed. METHODS: Two hundred twelve patients with refractory epilepsy, aged from 1 month to 20.5 years, received STP either in a single-blind, placebo-controlled trial (108 patients) or in a further open trial (104 other patients selected by epilepsy syndrome for possible efficacy based on the results of the previous trial). RESULTS: Among the 97 patients who could be analyzed for efficacy in the placebo-controlled study, the median seizure frequency was lower at 3 months with STP than with the placebo (p<0.0001); 49% responded to the drug, including 10% who became seizure free. Patients with partial epilepsy had the highest response rate (57%). Results were confirmed in the open study where 68% of the 91 patients receiving STP responded at 3 months. These patients were mainly those with partial epilepsy (73%) who were receiving carbamazepine (CBZ) (75%) as comedication (p<0.001). Ten of the 20 children with severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy also responded with clobazam (CLB) as comedication. Efficacy was sustained long term in 74% of the 94 patients still receiving STP at a mean 30-month follow-up. Adverse events were reported in 48% of the 212 patients, mainly anorexia and loss of weight, but these events required STP discontinuation in only nine cases. Side effects were minimized in the open trial by optimizing the dose of comedication. CONCLUSIONS: STP seems to be a promising add-on drug, particularly when combined with CBZ in patients with partial childhood epilepsy refractory to vigabatrin (VGB) and with CLB in patients with severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy.     

The New Antiepileptic Drugs: A Systematic Review of Their Efficacy and Tolerability

: Purpose: Gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), vigabatrin (VGB), and zonisamide (ZNS) are all in use as “add-on” treatment for patients with refractory epilepsy. There have been no comparative randomized controlled trials allowing an evidence-based choice between these drugs. We report a series of meta-analyses of randomized placebo-controlled add-on trials in which these drugs have been tested in patients with partial epilepsy. This work provides an estimate of each drug's efficacy and tolerability compared with placebo. These estimates are compared across drugs to give broad estimates of comparative efficacy and tolerability. Methods: Trial reports were found by searching Medline, by searching through journals by hand, and by contacting the pharmaceutical industry. The outcomes chosen were the proportion of patients who (a) have a 350% reduction in seizure frequency (50% responders); (b) withdrew from the study (any reason); or (c) reported the following side effects: ataxia, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, or somnolence. Overall odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIS; 50% responders) or 99% CIS; side effects) were calculated. Results: Twenty-nine trials were included, representing 4,091 randomized patients. The ORs for 50% response (95% CI) were GBP, 2.29 (1.53–3.43); LTG, 2.32 (1.47–3.68); TGB, 3.03 (2.01–4.58); TPM, 4.07 (2.87–5.78); VGB, 3.67 (2.44–5.51); and ZNS, 2.7 (1.36–4.47). ORs for discontinuation were GBP, 1.36 (0.75–2.49); LTG, 1.19 (0.79–1.79); TGB, 1.81 (1.21–2.70); TPM, 2.56 (1.64–4.00); VGB, 2.58 (126–5.27); and ZNS, 4.23 (1.71–10.49). Conclusions: We have clear evidence that each of these drugs is better than placebo at preventing seizures. When results are compared across drugs, the confidence intervals overlap, and we have no conclusive evidence of differences in efficacy or tolerability. Despite this, the agent that appears most effective may be twice as effective as the agent that appears least effective, and the agent that appears most likely to cause discontinuation may be 4 times more likely to do so than the treatment that appears least likely to do so. Comparative randomized studies are needed further to evaluate these drugs.     

Expanding Antiepileptic Drug Options: Clinical Efficacy of New Therapeutic Agents

Summary: Results of double-blind, placebo-controlled, add-on trials of topiramate (TPM), lamotrigine (LTG), and vigabatrin (VGB) in refractory partial epilepsy were reviewed. In three European multicenter studies of TPM, the clinical efficacy of 400–, 600–, and 800-mg/day target dosages was demonstrated. In a similarly designed United States trial, LTG was significantly superior to placebo at a 500-mg/day dosage but not at a 300-mg/day dosage. A meta-analysis of a number of smaller trials of VGB suggests that a ≥50% reduction in seizures is observed in approximately 45% of patients with refractory partial epilepsy. All of these newer antiepileptic drugs have shown efficacy in well-controlled trials and should contribute significantly to our ability to manage partial epilepsy.     

Long-term safety and efficacy of gabapentin (neurontin) as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures

In an international, multicenter, open-label study, the long-term efficacy and safety of gabapentin (GBP, Neurontin) as add-on therapy were investigated in 203 patients with partial seizures refractory to standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). All patients enrolled in this study had experienced improved seizure control with GBP in one of four previous, short-term studies. Patients received mean GBP dosages of 1,283 to 2,220 mg/day for periods of ⩽1,894 days (mean, 385 days). For purposes of efficacy analyses, data were divided into 12-week treatment periods. During long-term treatment, the efficacy of GBP was shown to be maintained by several primary efficacy measures. In all of the 12-week treatment periods, the percentage of change in seizure frequency from baseline was equal to or less than −24%, responder rate was >35%, and response ratio ranged between −0.2 and −0.338. Results for secondary efficacy measures also indicated that efficacy was maintained. The favorable safety profile of GBP also was maintained during long-term treatment. Our results suggest that GBP is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated add-on treatment for long-term use in patients with partial seizures refractory to standard AEDs.     

Long-term retention rates of lamotrigine, gabapentin, and topiramate in chronic epilepsy

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the long-term retention rates of lamotrigine (LTG), gabapentin (GBP), and topiramate (TPM) therapy for patients at a tertiary referral clinic for chronic, refractory epilepsy. METHODS: We analyzed 424 consecutive patients with chronic, refractory partial and/or generalized epilepsy who were started on LTG, 158 patients who were started on GBP, and 393 patients who were started on TPM. The percentages of patients who continued therapy with LTG, GBP, and TPM were estimated with the use of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Factors that influence retention were analyzed with the use of Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that at 3 years, 30% continued therapy on TPM compared with 29% on LTG and fewer than 10% on GBP. Adverse events resulted in therapy withdrawal in 40% of patients on TPM compared with GBP (37%) and LTG (22%). Perceived lack of efficacy led to treatment withdrawal in 39% of patients on GBP compared with 34% on LTG and 19% on TPM. Cox regression estimated that a fourth or fewer of patients with chronic partial epilepsy are likely to continue therapy with a new antiepileptic drug beyond 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of these new antiepileptic drugs on the long-term course of chronic partial epilepsy is likely to be small, as approximately three of four patients will discontinue therapy. More patients appear to continue on TPM compared with LTG or GBP, with a possible reason being better perceived efficacy of TPM, despite having the highest incidence of adverse events.     

Efficacy of Clobazam as Add-On Therapy in Patients with Refractory Partial Epilepsy

PURPOSE: Clobazam (CLB) has an important antiepileptic effect and is less expensive than the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), but still has not been considered as first-line drug in the treatment of epilepsy. We evaluated the efficacy of CLB as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. METHODS: This was an open, retrospective study, conducted at the epilepsy clinic of our university hospital. All patients had chronic epilepsy and were being evaluated for epilepsy surgery. CLB was introduced as add-on therapy (starting with 10 mg/ day) in patients with previous failure of at least two AEDs. Information was obtained from clinical notes and follow-up visits. RESULTS: We evaluated 97 patients, 37 men and 60 women. Ages ranged from 15 to 70 years (mean, 35.8 years). Etiology of epilepsy was hippocampal atrophy in 67 (69%), cortical dysgenesis in nine (9.3%), and other etiologies in nine (9.3%). In 12 (12.3%) patients, the etiology of epilepsy was not identified despite clinical and neurologic investigation. Patients used CLB for a period ranging from 1 month to 7 years and 9 months (mean, 16.7 months) with doses ranging from 10 to 60 mg/day (mean, 29.7 mg/day). Seven (7.2%) patients were seizure free, 48 (49.4%) had > or =50% of improvement in seizure control, 39 (40.2%) had <50% of improvement in seizure control, and in three (3.1%), no data were available. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that CLB may have efficacy equivalent to that of the new AEDs when used as add-on therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy. CLB should be considered an economic alternative in the treatment of patients with refractory epilepsy.     

Lamotrigine versus vigabatrin as an add-on therapy in refractory epilepsy: prospective study

Lamotrigine (LTG) and Vigabatrin (VGB) has been licensed widely as adjunctive therapy for partial and secondary generalized seizures. We compared the efficiency of Lamotrigine and Vigabatrin as adjuvant therapy for 33 patients (16 male and 17 female) with drug-resistant partial epileptic seizures (simple and complex) with secondary generalization receiving combination therapy (carbamazepine--CBZ and valproic acid--VPA). Patients were enrolled if they had experienced two partial seizures (simple or complex) and one secondary generalization/month, despite combination therapy. Neurologic evaluation including CT, MRI and EEG was performed every 3 months during observation. Blood specimens for CBZ and VPA plasma concentration were obtained prior to the first LTG or VGB dose and twice a year during the treatment. The assessment of LTG and VGB effectiveness was performed in 2-month intervals during 2-3 years for vigabatrin (mean daily dose 2.0 g) and 1-2 years for Lamotrigine (mean daily dose 0.3 g). The treatment (CBZ, VPA or both) with Vigabatrin or Lamotrigine as adjunctive therapy was effective in about a half of patients with refractory epilepsy. Findings suggest that the reduction in partial seizures (simple or complex) frequency with Vigabatrin is greater than that with Lamotrigine. On the other hand, Lamotrigine seems to be more effective in patients with partial epileptic seizures with secondary generalization.     

Gabapentin versus lamotrigine monotherapy: a double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy

PURPOSE: This randomised, double-blind study compared the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) gabapentin (GBP) and lamotrigine (LTG) as monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: Patients with partial seizures with and/or without secondary generalization or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures were randomized to either GBP or LTG. During 2- and 6-week titration periods, respectively, GBP dosage reached 1,800 mg/day, and LTG, 150 mg/day. In the subsequent 24-week maintenance phase, the dose could be adjusted based on seizure control or adverse events between 1,200 and 3,600 mg/day for GBP and 100 and 300 mg/day for LTG. The primary end point was time to exit, a composite of efficacy and tolerability. Evaluable patients were used for the primary efficacy analysis, whereas tolerability was examined on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients was randomized, and 291 (148 GBP, 143 LTG) were included in the evaluable population. Nineteen patients in each group had an exit event. The median time to exit was 69 days for GBP and 48 days for LTG. The hazard ratio was estimated as 1.043 (90% confidence intervals, 0.602-1.809). Overall, 106 (71.6% of the evaluable population) GBP-treated and 96 (67.1%) LTG-treated patients completed the study. Of those, 80 (75.5%) patients taking GBP and 73 (76.0%) taking LTG remained seizure free during the final 12 weeks of treatment. Only 14 (8.9%) GBP-treated patients and 15 (9.9%) LTG-treated patients withdrew because of study drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: GBP and LTG monotherapy were similarly effective and well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.     

Gabapentin in childhood epilepsy: a prospective evaluation of efficacy and safety

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin (GBP) in partial epilepsy in children. METHODS: We performed a prospective open label add-on study in 52 children and adolescents (age 1.8-17.5 years, mean 11.1 years) with refractory partial seizures. Gabapentin was added to one other baseline drug and the efficacy was rated according to seizure type and frequency. RESULTS: The GBP dose ranged from 26 to 78 mg/kg per day (mean 52 mg/kg per day) and was well tolerated in most patients. The seizure frequency remained unchanged in 34 patients (65%). We saw a provocation of seizures in three children (6%). Initially 15 patients (29%) benefited from GBP: five (10%) with a seizure reduction of 50-74%, seven (13%) with a reduction of 75-99% and three (6%) became seizure free. All but three experienced a development of tolerance within the next weeks to months. CONCLUSIONS: Although gabapentin seems also to be safe in children, the efficacy in refractory partial seizures was disappointing.