手术室麻醉苏醒护理对腹部手术患者全麻苏醒期躁动的作用

目的：探讨手术室麻醉苏醒护理对减少腹部手术患者全麻苏醒期躁动的作用。方法选取行全麻下腹部手术治疗的患者72例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组36例。对照组患者采取常规护理,观察组患者针对全麻术后苏醒期躁动的原因给予预防性和针对性的护理措施。比较两组患者苏醒期心率、血压指标及躁动程度。结果观察组患者苏醒期舒张压、收缩压及心率均显著低于对照组（均P＜0.05）,躁动发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论对腹部手术患者全麻苏醒期给予预防性和针对性的护理措施,可明显减少患者麻醉苏醒期躁动的发生率和程度,有利于患者病情恢复并减少术后意外事件。     

手术室麻醉苏醒护理对腹部手术患者全麻苏醒期躁动的影响

目的:探究腹部手术患者实行手术室麻醉苏醒护理对生命体征与全麻苏醒期躁动的影响。方法:选择2016年7月-2017年7月期间在我院进行腹部手术的30例患者作为对照组,选择2017年8月-2018年8月期间在我院进行腹部手术的30例患者作为观察组,对照组行常规护理,观察组行手术室麻醉苏醒护理,比较两组术前与苏醒期心率与血压、苏醒期躁动程度。结果:观察组术前与苏醒期心率与血压相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组苏醒期心率与血压均较术前高,且高于观察组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组苏醒期躁动程度低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:手术室麻醉苏醒护理应用于腹部手术患者可有效避免生命体征出现较大波动,减少躁动发生,促进机体康复。     

手术室麻醉苏醒护理在减少腹部手术患者全麻苏醒期躁动中的应用效果

目的：对手术室麻醉苏醒护理在减少腹部手术患者全麻苏醒期躁动的临床疗效进行分析和探讨。方法选择我院2012年12月至2014年3月收治的84例全麻下腹部手术治疗的患者作为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组各42例。将全麻苏醒期躁动的诱发因素作为根据,采用针对性和预防性的护理方法针对观察组患者进行护理;采用传统的护理方法针对对照组患者进行护理。对两组患者的躁动程度、血压指标以及苏醒期心率进行观察和比较。结果观察组在苏醒期心率、收缩压及舒张压3个指标上明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0．05）;观察组患者出现苏醒期躁动的有6例,发生率14．29％,对照组患者出现苏醒期躁动的有10例,发生率23．81％,两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0．05）。结论采用针对性和预防性的护理方式针对腹部手术患者全麻苏醒期进行护理,能够使麻醉苏醒期患者出现躁动的程度和发生率得到明显降低,对患者病情的康复十分有利,同时还可以使术后意外事件的发生率明显减少。     

腹部手术患者在手术室行麻醉苏醒时的护理方法探讨

取2013年4月~2014年10月在我院采取全麻下腹部手术治疗的80例患者,随机分为对照组和试验组各40例。对照组给予传统护理,试验组采用术后针对性护理的措施。比较两组患者苏醒期血压、心率指标与躁动程度及发生率。结果试验组患者苏醒期收缩压、舒张压及心率均明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组苏醒后不良事故发生率为12.5%,明显低于对照组(42.5%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组患者躁动发生率为15.00%,明显低于对照组(67.50%),差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腹部手术患者全麻苏醒期采用相应的麻醉苏醒护理,可显著降低全麻苏醒期的躁动,值得临床推广应用。     

手术室综合性护理在老年全麻腹部手术患者中的应用

目的:探讨手术室综合性护理在老年全麻腹部手术患者中的应用效果。方法:将90例全麻腹部手术患者随机分为观察组和对照组各45例,对照组实施常规手术室护理,观察组在对照组基础上对患者苏醒期躁动诱发因素进行分析,并实施综合性护理。结果:观察组血压、心率等指标明显优于对照组(P0.05),躁动发生率低于对照组(P0.05),患者意识恢复时间和苏醒评分达4分的时间明显短于对照组(P0.05),不良反应发生率明显低于对照组(P0.05)。结论:将综合性护理应用于手术室中,可有效预防老年全麻腹部术后患者苏醒延迟,稳定麻醉后血压和心率,减少躁动的发生,帮助患者安全度过全麻苏醒期,值得临床推广应用。     

麻醉前心理护理干预对全身麻醉苏醒期躁动的影响分析

目的研究分析全身麻醉前心理护理干预对苏醒期躁动的影响。方法将2015年10月~2016年10月期间在本院接受全身麻醉的手术患者中,选取符合本组纳入标准的100例患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为两组,对照组50例和观察组50例,对照组患者实施常规护理,观察组术前给予心理护理干预,比较两组患者在预后、心率、血压、躁动评分、满意度的变化。结果麻醉前及苏醒期观察组患者收缩压、舒张压、心率变化不明显,对照组患者发生明显变化,苏醒期观察组患者收缩压、舒张压、心率低于对照组(P0.05);观察组患者苏醒期躁动0级比例90.00%,高于对照组的68.00%,苏醒期躁动1级比例6.00%,低于对照组的20.00%(P0.05);观察组患者护理总满意率94.00%,高于对照组的80.00%,两组比较差异存在统计学意义(P0.05)。结论对全身麻醉手术患者实施麻醉前心理护理,有利于稳定患者苏醒期血压和心率,减少苏醒期躁动的发生,可在临床积极推广和应用。     

手术室麻醉苏醒期护理对腹部手术患者全身麻醉苏醒期躁动及血压、心率的影响

目的研究手术室麻醉苏醒期护理对腹部手术患者全身麻醉苏醒期躁动(EA)及血压、心率等指标的影响。方法选取该院2016年1月至2017年1月收治的106例腹部手术患者进行分析,将行常规护理者作为对照组(53例),行手术室麻醉苏醒护理者作为研究组(53例),比较2组EA评分、EA发生率、心率、血压变化及不良事件发生率。结果研究组EA发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);研究组苏醒期心率、舒张压、收缩压等指标均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);研究组总不良事件率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹部手术患者行手术室麻醉苏醒期护理可降低EA发生率,值得推广。     

手术室护理干预对全麻留置导尿管患者苏醒期躁动的影响

目的观察手术室护理干预对全麻留置导尿管患者苏醒期躁动的影响。方法选取2016年3月～2017年5月在我院行全麻并给予留置导尿管患者78例为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各39例。对照组实施常规护理。观察组实施手术室护理干预。比较两组苏醒期躁动和躁动分级、苏醒期末及术后12h尿路刺激发生率及分级情况。结果观察组苏醒期躁动发生率及躁动分级低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组苏醒期末尿路刺激发生率及分级低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组术后12h尿路刺激发生率及分级低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论手术室护理干预可有效减少全麻留置导尿管患者苏醒期躁动及尿路刺激发生率,提高患者术后舒适度,有利于促进患者术后康复。     

优质护理对全麻手术患者麻醉苏醒期躁动及满意度的影响

目的探讨优质护理对全麻手术患者麻醉苏醒期躁动及满意度的影响。方法选取2015年1月至2016年1月于我院进行腹部全麻手术患者120例为研究对象,随机将其等分为对照组和观察组,对照组采用常规护理,观察组患者采用优质护理,比较两组患者麻醉苏醒期躁动发生率及护理满意度。结果观察组患者的护理满意度明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05);观察组患者的躁动发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。结论对全麻手术患者行优质护理可以有效降低麻醉苏醒期躁动发生率,提高护理满意度,改善护患关系,值得临床推广应用。     

术前体验式护理联合麻醉苏醒护理对HoLEP全麻苏醒期躁动患者的影响

目的：探讨术前体验式护理联合麻醉苏醒护理对经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术(HoLEP)患者全麻苏醒期躁动患者的影响。方法：选取2021年4月1日～2022年4月30日确诊为良性前列腺增生(BPH)需行HoLEP治疗的96例患者随机分为对照组和实验组各48例,对照组采用传统常规护理方法,实验组实施术前体验式护理联合麻醉苏醒护理。比较两组全麻苏醒期心率和血压、躁动情况及心理状态。结果：实验组全麻苏醒期心率、血压优于对照组(P<0.01);实验组全麻苏醒期躁动发生率低于对照组(P<0.05);护理后,实验组焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分均低于对照组(P<0.01)。结论：术前体验式护理联合麻醉苏醒护理应用于HoLEP患者,能够降低患者全麻苏醒期躁动发生率,有效缓解交感神经兴奋引起的应激反应,改善患者焦虑、抑郁情绪。     

Relatedness and waking suggestibility

Volunteering pairs of Ss took 9 waking tests (WT) of hypnotic susceptibility as one part of a larger study. Pairs included siblings, friends, and strangers. Concordance correlations from 20 sibling pairs were positive for 7 of the 9 WT, 2 significantly so. For 19 pairs of strangers, correlations were insignificant, 5 positive, 4 negative. These data reopen nature-nurture questions about the origins of individual differences in hypnotic aptitude. Concordance data from 27 female friend pairs and 10 male friend pairs are confusing and are not interpreted here. For 20 pairs of cross-sex friends, however, 7 of 9 correlations were negative, 1 significant, and 2 approaching significance. 6 of 9 concordance correlations from 16 spouse pairs were also negative, but none was significant.     

A comparison of hypnotic and waking recall

This paper presents data from a programmatic series of studies that varied the range of conditions affecting potential increase of recall, memory distortions, and distortions of confidence during and following hypnosis. All the studies used a paradigm that exposed Ss to misleading information some time before memory was tested and applied procedures in the hypnotic setting to analyze memory performance in both recognition and free recall. Results from the program failed to demonstrate any increment in accurate memory due to hypnosis, and the accuracy of memory reports in hypnosis was at times significantly reduced. Further, hypnotic recall was distinctively distorted when false information was introduced after, rather than before hypnosis. Results were discussed in relation to the role hypnotic as opposed to contextual variables may play in explaining Ss' memory test performances, and some legal implications are drawn from the data.     

A comparison of hypnotic and waking learning of the international morse code

Two patients undergoing surgery for pedicle attachments of the right ankle above the left knee because of gunshot wounds were taught hypnotic techniques to use during the post-operative period of attachment to alleviate pain and discomfort. Training sessions for one and one-half weeks consisted of developing a systematic procedure involving 5 phases: (1) progressive relaxation, (2) arm levitation, (3) deepening, (4) self-relaxation, and (5) waking. Results indicated that, following the initial post-operative period of 5 to 6 days, where some pain medication was given, the patients were able to maintain themselves thereafter without requiring medication for pain for 16 and 19 days, respectively. Knee pain, which is almost invariably experienced, was not encountered by these patients and no post-operative complications were evidenced. Motivation and morale were excellent and both patients were cooperative and able to help care for themselves.     

Development of behaviors in preterm infants: relation to sleeping and waking

BACKGROUND: Although nurse clinicians and researchers use infant behaviors to indicate the responses of preterm infant to stimulation, little is known about how the biological factors of development, sleeping and waking states, infant characteristics, and infant illness severity affect preterm infant behaviors. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the development of eight infant behaviors over the preterm period and determined the relation of these behaviors to sleeping and waking and to infant characteristics and illness severity. METHODS: Seventy-one preterm infants were observed once per week from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. from the time they were no longer critical until term or discharge. The occurrence of four sleep-wake states and eight behaviors were recorded every 10 seconds during the observations. RESULTS: Negative facial expressions increased over the preterm period; sighs, startle/jerks, jitters, and the likelihood of having hiccups decreased. Infant characteristics had only minor effects: boys had more negative facial expressions, and longer mechanical ventilation was associated with more sighs and jitters. All behaviors showed state-related differences in frequency. In addition, only startle/jerks and jitters showed the same developmental patterns within each state. CONCLUSIONS: Significant development of infant behaviors occurs over the preterm period but involves changes not only in the absolute percentage of each behavior but also in the percentages within each sleeping and waking state. Thus, preterm infant behaviors cannot be used clinically for assessment without consideration of the state in which they occur.     

Functional EEG topography in sleep and waking: state-dependent and state-independent features

Power spectra in the non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) electroencephalogram (EEG) have been shown to exhibit frequency-specific topographic features that may point to functional differences in brain regions. Here, we extend the analysis to rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) and waking (W) to determine the extent to which EEG topography is determined by state under two different levels of sleep pressure. Multichannel EEG recordings were obtained from young men during a baseline night, a 40-h waking period, and a recovery night. Sleep deprivation enhanced EEG power in the low-frequency range (1-8 Hz) in all three vigilance states. In NREMS, the effect was largest in the delta band, in W, in the theta band, while in REMS, there was a peak in both the delta and the theta band. The response of REMS to prolonged waking and its pattern of EEG topography was intermediate between NREMS and W. Cluster analysis revealed a major topographic segregation into three frequency bands (1-8 Hz, 9-15 Hz, 16-24 Hz), which was largely independent of state and sleep pressure. To assess individual topographic traits within each state, the differences between pairs of power maps were compared within (i.e., for baseline and recovery) and between individuals (i.e., separately for baseline and recovery). A high degree of intraindividual correspondence of the power maps was observed. The frequency-specific clustering of power maps suggests that distinct generators underlie EEG frequency bands. Although EEG power is modulated by state and sleep pressure, basic topographic features appear to be state-independent.     

不同催眠感受性个体在清醒及催眠状态下的脑电图差异

目的:观察在清醒及催眠状态下,不同催眠感受性个体的脑电图特征和差异。方法:2003-06/2004-01对成都市6所高校169名正常汉族大学生(四川大学、成都中医药大学、四川师范学院、四川教育学院、成都体育学院、西南民族学院)用斯坦福团体催眠感受性量表C式(SGHSS:C)进行施测,其中总分0～3分为低催眠感受性组,总分4～6分为中催眠感受性组,总分7～11分为高催眠感受性组。判断受试者是否进入催眠状态标准为:①进入催眠状态:脑电图测试时,受试者在催眠诱导后的语言抑制、眼皮僵直、催眠后遗忘、左手上浮4个项目的总分为1～4分。②未进入催眠状态:受试者得分为0分。比较进入催眠状态高催眠感受性个体和低感受性个体的脑电图。结果:参加实验169名学生,斯坦福团体催眠感受性量表C式有高、低催眠感受性的学生56名,最后进入催眠状态的50名学生进入结果分析。高催眠感受性29名,低催眠感受性21名。高、低催眠感受性个体在清醒和催眠状态下的脑电图差异涉及到两侧大脑半球的所有脑电节律。高感受性个体在清醒和催眠状态下左侧慢波更多(P=0.030～0.050),双侧β波更多(P=0.018～0.054);高、低感受性组在催眠后均出现慢波增加、快波减少、脑电活动的振幅下降(P<0.05),但高感受性组的频率指数改变所涉及的节律更多,分布更广。结论:高、低催眠感受性个体在清醒和催眠状态下的脑电图差异涉及到两侧大脑半球的所有脑电节律,并呈现一定的脑电节律的组合。