Peripartum hysterectomy in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence and associated risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy in singleton pregnancies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all women with singleton pregnancies admitted for delivery in 2002 taken from the National Healthcare Insurance database. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for maternal and hospital characteristics using logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 287 peripartum hysterectomies in 214 237 singleton pregnancies (0.13%). Cesarean delivery, vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), and repeat cesarean delivery had higher hysterectomy rates than vaginal delivery, with adjusted ORs of 12.13 (95% CI 8.30-17.74), 5.12 (95% CI 1.19-21.92), and 3.84 (95% CI 2.52-5.86), respectively. Pregnancies complicated with placenta previa, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and premature labor were associated with significantly increased risks for peripartum hysterectomy (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy included cesarean delivery, VBAC, repeat cesarean, placenta previa, GDM, and premature labor. VBAC and repeat cesarean had a similar risk.     

Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors

BACKGROUND: Induction of labor has been associated with an increased risk of emergency cesarean delivery. Knowledge of factors that influence the risk of cesarean delivery in women with induced labor is limited. METHODS: We performed a case-control study, nested within a population-based cohort of women with induced labor at term during 1991-1996 in Uppsala County, Sweden. Cases were women delivered with emergency cesarean delivery, and controls were women vaginally delivered (n = 193, respectively). Using logistic regression, analyses were performed. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used as a measure of relative risk. RESULTS: Women with a previous cesarean delivery had high risks of cesarean delivery (adjusted OR = 10.10, 95% CI = 3.30-30.92). The risk of cesarean delivery was also increased among nulliparous (adjusted OR = 4.92, 95% CI = 2.81-8.61), short (adjusted OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.06-4.59), and obese women (adjusted OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.07-3.84). A cervix dilatation less than 1.5 cm doubled the risk of cesarean delivery (adjusted OR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.09-4.66). Mother's age, epidural analgesia, oxytocin augmentation, gestational age, and birthweight were not significantly associated with risks of cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Women with a previous cesarean delivery, nulliparous, short, and obese women with induced labor are at high risk of a cesarean delivery. When there is a need to deliver a woman with a previous cesarean section or a nulliparous woman with other risk factors for cesarean delivery, it may be prudent to consider an elective cesarean section.     

Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk of cesarean delivery associated with elective induction of labor in nulliparous women at term. METHODS: We performed a cohort study on a major urban obstetric service that serves predominantly private obstetric practices. All term, nulliparous women with vertex, singleton gestations who labored during an 8-month period (n = 1561) were divided into three groups: spontaneous labor, elective induction, and medical induction. The risk of cesarean delivery in the induction groups was determined using stepwise logistic regression to control for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Women experiencing spontaneous labor had a 7.8% cesarean delivery rate, whereas women undergoing elective labor induction had a 17.5% cesarean delivery rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12, 3.18) and women undergoing medically indicated labor induction had a 17.7% cesarean delivery rate (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.13, 2.54). Other variables that remained significant risk factors for cesarean delivery in the model included: epidural placement at less than 4 cm dilatation (OR 4.66; 95% CI 2.25, 9.66), epidural placement after 4 cm dilatation (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.06, 4.48), chorioamnionitis (OR 4.61; 95% CI 2.89, 7.35), birth weight greater than 4000 g (OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.69, 3.97), maternal body mass index greater than 26 kg/m2 (OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.61, 3.47), Asian race (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.04, 5.34), and magnesium sulfate use (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.04, 4.55). CONCLUSION: Elective induction of labor is associated with a significantly increased risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women. Avoiding labor induction in settings of unproved benefit may aid efforts to reduce the primary cesarean delivery rate.     

Induction of labor in twin gestation: lessons from a population based study

Introduction: The route of delivery and the role of induction of labor in twin gestations are controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of induction of labor in twin gestations.

Methods: This retrospective population based cohort study included 4605 twin gestations divided into following groups: 1) spontaneous parturition (n?=?2937, 63.78%); 2) induction of labor (n?=?653, 14.2%) and 3) elective cesarean delivery (n?=?1015, 22.04%).

Results: The rate of vaginal delivery in the labor induction group was 81% (529/653). In comparison to the other study groups, induction of labor in twins was independently associated with a 77% reduction in the risk of cesarean delivery (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.18–0.31) and a 78% reduction in the risk of postpartum death for the second twin (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05–0.94). The rate of nulliparity, term delivery and labor dystocia was higher in the induction of labor group (p?<?0.001 in all comparisons).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that induction of labor in twin gestation is successful and is independently associated with substantial reduction in the risk of cesarean delivery and postpartum death of the second twin.     

Identifying risk factors for peripartum cesarean hysterectomy. A population-based study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of, and obstetric risk factors for, emergency peripartum hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A population-based study comparing all singleton deliveries between the years 1988 and 1999 that were complicated with peripartum hysterectomy to deliveries without this complication. Statistical analysis was performed with multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Emergency peripartum hysterectomy complicated 0.048% (n = 56) of deliveries in the study (n = 117,685). Independent risk factors for emergency peripartum hysterectomy from a backward, stepwise, multivariable logistic regression model were: uterine rupture (OR = 521.4, 95% CI 197.1-1379.7), placenta previa (OR = 8.2, 95% CI 2.2-31.0), postpartum hemorrhage (OR = 33.3, 95% CI 12.6-88.1), cervical tears (OR = 18.0, 95% CI 6.2-52.4), placenta accreta (OR = 13.2, 95% CI 3.5-50.0), second-trimester bleeding (OR = 9.5, 95% CI 2.3-40.1), previous cesarean section (OR = 6.9, 95% CI 3.7-12.8) and grand multiparity (> 5 deliveries) (OR = 3.4, 95% CI 1.8-6.3). Newborns delivered after peripartum hysterectomy had lower Apgar scores (< 7) at 1 and 5 minutes than did others (OR = 11.5, 95% CI 6.2-20.9 and OR = 27.4, 95% CI 11.2-67.4, respectively). In addition, higher rates of perinatal mortality were noted in the uterine hysterectomy vs. the comparison group (OR = 15.9, 95% CI 7.5-32.6). Affected women were more likely than the controls to receive packed-cell transfusions (OR = 457.7, 95% CI 199.2-1105.8) and had lower hemoglobin levels at discharge from the hospital (9.9 +/- 1.3 vs. 12.8 +/- 5.7, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Cesarean deliveries in patients with suspected placenta accreta, specifically those performed due to placenta previa in women with a previous uterine scar, should involve specially trained obstetricians. In addition, detailed informed consent about the possibility of emergency peripartum hysterectomy and its associated morbidity should be obtained.     

Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the national incidence of peripartum hysterectomy and quantify the risk associated with cesarean deliveries and other factors. METHODS: A population-based, matched case-control study using the United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System, including 318 women in the United Kingdom who underwent peripartum hysterectomy between February 2005 and February 2006 and 614 matched control women. RESULTS: The incidence of peripartum hysterectomy was 4.1 cases per 10,000 births (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-4.5). Maternal mortality was 0.6% (95% CI 0-1.5%). Previous cesarean delivery (odds ratio [OR] 3.52, 95% CI 2.35-5.26), maternal age over 35 years (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.66-3.58), parity of three or greater (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.26-4.18), previous manual placental removal (OR 12.5, 95% CI 1.17-133.0), previous myomectomy (OR 14.0, 95% CI 1.31-149.3), and twin pregnancy (OR 6.30, 95% CI 1.73-23.0) were all risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy. The risk associated with previous cesarean delivery was higher with increasing numbers of previous cesarean deliveries (OR 2.14 with one previous delivery [95% CI 1.37-3.33], 18.6 with two or more [95% CI 7.67-45.4]). Women undergoing a first cesarean delivery in the current pregnancy were also at increased risk (OR 7.13, 95% CI 3.71-13.7). CONCLUSION: Peripartum hysterectomy is strongly associated with previous cesarean delivery, and the risk rises with increasing number of previous cesarean deliveries, maternal age over 35 years, and parity greater than 3. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.     

Spontaneous versus induced labor after a previous cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in spontaneous versus induced labor after one previous cesarean delivery. METHODS: Women with one previous cesarean delivery who had spontaneous labor between January 1992 and January 2000 were compared with those whose labor was induced. RESULTS: Three thousand seven hundred forty-six patients had a trial of labor (2943 spontaneous, 803 induced). Those induced had more frequent early postpartum hemorrhage (7.3% versus 5.0%; odds ratio [OR] 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18, 2.32), cesarean delivery (37.5% versus 24.2%; OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.51, 2.25), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (13.3% versus 9.4%; OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.25, 2.29). There was a trend toward higher uterine rupture rates in those with induced versus spontaneous labor (0.7% versus 0.3%, P =.128) and for patients undergoing dinoprostone (prostaglandin E(2)) induction versus other methods (1.1% versus 0.6%, P =.62), although neither difference achieved statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Induced labor is associated with an increased rate of early postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean delivery, and neonatal ICU admission. The higher rate of uterine rupture in those who had labor induced was not statistically significant.     

Maternal body mass index, delivery route, and induction of labor in a midwifery caseload

The purpose of this study was to identify the association between prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), weight gain in pregnancy, and newborn birth weight on route of delivery and induction of labor in patients receiving nurse-midwifery care. This retrospective cohort study examined the outcomes of 1500 consecutively delivered women who were cared for by two midwifery practices and delivered between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2000. Cesarean delivery was significantly associated with the obese BMI (P < .001), nulliparity (P < .02), and newborn birth weight (P =.006). Prenatal weight gain did not have a significant correlation with cesarean birth (P = .24). In multivariable modeling, obese BMI, high newborn birth weight, nulliparity, and induction of labor increased the risk of cesarean birth. There was also a significant association between higher BMI and risk of induction of labor (P < .001). In a secondary analysis, obese BMI was associated with increased risk of induction in cases with ruptured membranes (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.4-3.4) and postdates pregnancy (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.1-3.4).     

Peripartum cesarean hysterectomy: critical analysis of risk factors and trends over the years

Objective.?To investigate time trends and risk factors for peripartum cesarean hysterectomy.

Methods.?A population-based study comparing all deliveries that were complicated with peripartum hysterectomy to deliveries without this complication was conducted. Deliveries occurred during the years 1988–2007 at a tertiary medical center. A multiple logistic regression model was constructed to find independent risk factors associated with peripartum hysterectomy.

Results.?Emergency peripartum cesarean hysterectomy complicated 0.06% (n?=?125) of all deliveries in the study period (n?=?211,815). The incidence of peripartum hysterectomy increased over time (1988–1994, 0.04%; 1995–2000, 0.05%; 2001–2007, 0.095%). Independent risk factors for emergency peripratum hysterectomy from a backward, stepwise, multivariable logistic regression model were: uterine rupture (OR?=?487; 95% CI 257.8–919.8, p?<?0.001), placenta previa (OR?=?66.4; 95% CI 39.8–111, p?<?0.001), postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) (OR?=?40.8; 95% CI 22.4–74.6, p?<?0.001), cervical tears (OR?=?22.3; 95% CI 10.4–48.1, p?<?0.001), second trimester bleeding (OR?=?6; 95% CI 1.8–20, p?=?0.003), previous cesarean delivery (OR?=?5.4; 95% CI 3.5–8.4, p?<?0.001), placenta accreta (OR?=?4.7; 95% CI 1.9–11.7, p?=?0.001), and grand multiparity (above five deliveries, OR?=?4.1; 95% CI 2.5–6.6, p?<?0.001). Newborns of these women had lower Apgar scores (<7) at 1 and 5?min (32.7% vs.4.4%; p?<?0.001, and 10.5% vs. 0.6%; p?<?0.001, respectively), and higher rates of perinatal mortality (18.4% vs. 1.4%; p?<?0.001) as compared to the comparison group.

Conclusion.?Significant risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy are uterine rupture, placenta previa, PPH, cervical tears, previous cesarean delivery, placenta accreta, and grand multiparity. Since the incidence rates are increasing over time, careful surveillance is warranted. Cesarean deliveries in patients with placenta previa-accreta, specifically those performed in women with a previous cesarean delivery, should involve specially trained obstetricians, following informed consent regarding the possibility of peripartum hysterectomy.     

Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk and risk factors for cesarean delivery associated with medical and elective induction of labor in nulliparous women. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in nulliparous women at term with vertex singleton gestations who had labor induced at 2 obstetrical centers. Medical and elective indications and Bishop scores were recorded before labor induction. Obstetric and neonatal data were analyzed and compared with the results in women with a spontaneous onset of labor. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariable regression modeling. RESULTS: A total of 1,389 women were included in the study. The cesarean delivery rate was 12.0% in women with a spontaneous onset of labor (n = 765), 23.4% in women undergoing labor induction for medical reasons (n = 435) (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-3.06), and 23.8% in women whose labor was electively induced (n = 189) (unadjusted OR 2.29; 95% CI 1.53-3.41). However, after adjusting for the Bishop score at admission, no significant differences in cesarean delivery rates were found among the 3 groups. A Bishop score of 5 or less was a predominant risk factor for a cesarean delivery in all 3 groups (adjusted OR 2.32; 95% CI 1.66-3.25). Other variables with significantly increased risk for cesarean delivery included maternal age of 30 years or older, body mass index of 31 or higher, use of epidural analgesia during the first stage of labor, and birth weight of 3,500 g or higher. In both induction groups, more newborns required neonatal care, more mothers needed a blood transfusion, and the maternal hospital stay was longer. CONCLUSION: Compared with spontaneous onset of labor, medical and elective induction of labor in nulliparous women at term with a single fetus in cephalic presentation is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery, predominantly related to an unfavorable Bishop score at admission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.     

Pelvic floor morbidity up to one year after difficult instrumental delivery and cesarean section in the second stage of labor: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess symptoms of pelvic floor morbidity at 6 weeks and at 1 year after difficult instrumental vaginal delivery or cesarean section during the second stage of labor. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of 393 women with term, singleton, cephalic pregnancies who required operative delivery in surgery at full dilatation between February 1999 and February 2000. Postal questionnaires were used for follow-up at 6 weeks and at 1 year. RESULTS: Instrumental delivery was associated with a greater risk of urinary incontinence at 6 weeks and at 1-year postdelivery, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 7.8 (95% CI, 2.6-23.6) and OR 3.1 (95% CI, 1.3-7.6), respectively. Although instrumental delivery was associated with an increased risk of moderate-to-severe dyspareunia at 6 weeks, adjusted OR 3.35 (95% CI, 1.36-8.25), this difference was not significant at 1 year. Cesarean section after attempted instrumental delivery was associated with an increased risk of moderate-to-severe pain during intercourse at 1 year compared with immediate cesarean section, (18% vs 9%) P=.01. CONCLUSION: Although cesarean section at full dilatation does not completely protect women from pelvic floor morbidity, those that followed instrumental delivery had a significantly greater prevalence of urinary symptoms and dyspareunia. Urinary symptoms persist up to 1 year after delivery.     

Mode of Delivery after Epidural Analgesia in a Cohort of Low‐Risk Nulliparas

Abstract: Background: Although epidural analgesia is widespread and very effective for alleviating labor pain, its use is still controversial, as the literature is inconsistent about the risk of adverse birth outcome after administration of epidural analgesia. The aim of this study was to explore associations between epidural analgesia and mode of delivery. Methods: Data were obtained from a prospective cohort from nine Danish labor wards and comprised 2,721 term nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor and a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation. Information about epidural analgesia, mode of delivery, and birth complications was obtained by the staff attending labor. Additional information was provided from self‐administered questionnaires in gestational week 37. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the association between epidural analgesia and birth outcomes. Results are presented as crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR [95% CI]). Results: Of the total cohort, 21.6 percent required epidural analgesia, 8.7 percent had emergency cesarean section, and 14.9 percent had vacuum extraction. Women with epidural analgesia had a higher risk of emergency cesarean section (adjusted OR: 5.8; 95% CI: 4.1–8.1), and vacuum extraction (adjusted OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.3–2.2). In a subgroup of the cohort with a very low overall risk of cesarean section, 3.4 percent had emergency cesarean section and an increased risk of emergency cesarean section was also found in this group (adjusted OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.5–8.2). Conclusions: In nulliparous women of a very low‐risk population, use of epidural analgesia for labor pain was associated with higher risks of emergency cesarean section and vacuum extraction. (BIRTH 38:4 December 2011)     

Risk of maternal postpartum readmission associated with mode of delivery

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cesarean and operative vaginal deliveries are associated with an increased risk of maternal rehospitalization compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery. METHODS: A population-based cohort study was conducted by using the Canadian Institute for Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database between 1997/1998 and 2000/2001, which included 900,108 women aged 15-44 years with singleton live births (after excluding several selected obstetric conditions). RESULTS: A total of 16,404 women (1.8%) were rehospitalized within 60 days after initial discharge. Compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery (rate 1.5%), cesarean delivery was associated with a significantly increased risk of postpartum readmission (rate 2.7%, odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-1.9); ie, there was 1 excess postpartum readmission per 75 cesarean deliveries. Diagnoses associated with significantly increased risks of readmission after cesarean delivery (compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery) included pelvic injury/wounds (rate 0.86% versus 0.06%, OR 13.4, 95% CI 12.0-15.0), obstetric complications (rate 0.23% versus 0.08%, OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.6-3.5), venous disorders and thromboembolism (rate 0.07% versus 0.03%, OR 2.7, 95% CI 2.1-3.4), and major puerperal infection (rate 0.45% versus 0.27%, OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.6-1.9). Women delivered by forceps or vacuum were also at an increased risk of readmission (rates 2.2% and 1.8% versus 1.5%; OR forceps: 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.5; OR vacuum: 1.2, 95% CI 1.2-1.3, respectively). Higher readmission rates after operative vaginal delivery were due to pelvic injury/wounds, genitourinary conditions, obstetric complications, postpartum hemorrhage, and major puerperal infection. CONCLUSION: Compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, and operative vaginal delivery increase the risk of maternal postpartum readmission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.     

Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of pre-induction cervical length, parity, gestational age at induction, maternal age and body mass index (BMI) on the possibility of successful delivery in women undergoing induction of labor. METHODS: In 822 singleton pregnancies, induction of labor was carried out at 35 to 42(+6) weeks of gestation. The cervical length was measured by transvaginal sonography before induction. The effect of cervical length, parity, gestational age, maternal age and BMI on the interval between induction and vaginal delivery within 24 hours was investigated using Cox's proportional hazard model. The likelihood of vaginal delivery within 24 hours and risk for cesarean section overall and for failure to progress was investigated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Successful vaginal delivery within 24 hours of induction occurred in 530 (64.5%) of the 822 women. Cesarean sections were performed in 161 (19.6%) cases, 70 for fetal distress and 91 for failure to progress. Cox's proportional hazard model indicated that significant prediction of the induction-to-delivery interval was provided by the pre-induction cervical length (HR=0.89, 95% CI 0.88-0.90, p<0.0001), parity (HR=2.39, 95% CI 1.98-2.88, p<0.0001), gestational age (HR=1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.2, p=or<0.0001) and birth weight percentile (HR=0.995, 95% CI 0.99-0.995, p=0.001), but not by maternal age or BMI. Logistic regression analysis indicated that significant prediction of the likelihood of vaginal delivery within 24 hours was provided by pre-induction cervical length (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.84-0.88, p<0.0001), parity (OR=3.59, 95% CI 2.47-5.22, p<0.0001) and gestational age (OR=1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.32, p=or<0.0001) but not by BMI or maternal age. The risk of cesarean section overall was significantly associated with all the variables under consideration, i.e., pre-induction cervical length (OR=1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.11, p<0.0001), parity (OR=0.25, 95% CI 0.17-0.38, p<0.0001), BMI (OR=1.85, 95% CI 1.24-2.74, p=0.0024), gestational age (OR=0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.98, p=0.0215) and maternal age (OR=1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p=0.0192). The risk of cesarean section for failure to progress was also significantly associated with pre-induction cervical length (OR=1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.14, p<0.0001), parity (OR=0.26, 95% CI 0.15-0.43, p<0.0001), gestational age (OR=0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.96, p=0.0097) and BMI (OR=2.07, 95% CI 1.27-3.37, p=0.0036). CONCLUSION: In women undergoing induction of labor, pre-induction cervical length, parity, gestational age at induction, maternal age and BMI have a significant effect on the interval between induction and delivery within 24 hours, likelihood of vaginal delivery within 24 hours and the risk of cesarean section.     

Placenta previa: obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome

Objective: To determine the incidence, obstetric risk factors and perinatal outcome of placenta previa. Study design: All singleton deliveries at our institution between 1990 and 1998 complicated with placenta previa were compared with those without placenta previa. Results: Placenta previa complicated 0.38% ( n = 298) of all singleton deliveries ( n = 78 524). A back-step multiple logistic regression model found the following factors to be independently correlated with the occurrence of placenta previa: maternal age above 40 years (OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.0-4.9), infertility treatments (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.8-5.6), a previous Cesarean section (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.4), a history of habitual abortions (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.3-2.7) and Jewish ethnicity (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.8). Pregnancies complicated with placenta previa had significantly higher rates of second-trimester bleeding (OR 156.0, 95% CI 87.2-277.5), pathological presentations (OR 7.6, 95% CI 5.7-10.1), abruptio placentae (OR 13.1, 95% CI 8.2-20.7), congenital malformations (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.2), perinatal mortality (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-5.6), Cesarean delivery (OR 57.4, 95% CI 40.7-81.4), Apgar scores at 5 min lower than 7 (OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.3-8.3), placenta accreta (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.1-9.9) postpartum hemorrhage (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.2-10.5), postpartum anemia (OR 5.5, 95% CI 4.4-6.9) and delayed maternal and infant discharge from the hospital (OR 10.9, 95% CI 7.3-16.1) as compared to pregnancies without placenta previa. In a multivariable analysis investigating risk factors for perinatal mortality, the following were found to be independent significant factors: congenital malformations, placental abruption, pathological presentations and preterm delivery. In contrast, placenta previa and Cesarean section were found to be protective factors against the occurrence of perinatal mortality while controlling for confounders. Conclusion: Although an abnormal implantation per se was not an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality, placenta previa should be considered as a marker for possible obstetric complications. Hence, the detection of placenta previa should encourage a careful evaluation with timely delivery in order to reduce the associated maternal and perinatal complications.     

Placenta previa: obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence, obstetric risk factors and perinatal outcome of placenta previa. STUDY DESIGN: All singleton deliveries at our institution between 1990 and 1998 complicated with placenta previa were compared with those without placenta previa. RESULTS: Placenta previa complicated 0.38% (n = 298) of all singleton deliveries (n = 78 524). A back-step multiple logistic regression model found the following factors to be independently correlated with the occurrence of placenta previa: maternal age above 40 years (OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.0-4.9), infertility treatments (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.8-5.6), a previous Cesarean section (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.4), a history of habitual abortions (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.3-2.7) and Jewish ethnicity (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.8). Pregnancies complicated with placenta previa had significantly higher rates of second-trimester bleeding (OR 156.0, 95% CI 87.2-277.5), pathological presentations (OR 7.6, 95% CI 5.7-10.1), abruptio placentae (OR 13.1, 95% CI 8.2-20.7), congenital malformations (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.2), perinatal mortality (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-5.6), Cesarean delivery (OR 57.4, 95% CI 40.7-81.4), Apgar scores at 5 min lower than 7 (OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.3-8.3), placenta accreta (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.1-9.9) postpartum hemorrhage (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.2-10.5), postpartum anemia (OR 5.5, 95% CI 4.4-6.9) and delayed maternal and infant discharge from the hospital (OR 10.9, 95% CI 7.3-16.1) as compared to pregnancies without placenta previa. In a multivariable analysis investigating risk factors for perinatal mortality, the following were found to be independent significant factors: congenital malformations, placental abruption, pathological presentations and preterm delivery. In contrast, placenta previa and Cesarean section were found to be protective factors against the occurrence of perinatal mortality while controlling for confounders. CONCLUSION: Although an abnormal implantation per se was not an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality, placenta previa should be considered as a marker for possible obstetric complications. Hence, the detection of placenta previa should encourage a careful evaluation with timely delivery in order to reduce the associated maternal and perinatal complications.     

Complications in pregnancy, labor, and delivery with uterine leiomyomas: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which uterine leiomyomas are associated with characteristics of pregnancy, labor, and neonatal outcome recorded on birth certificates. METHODS: In a population-based series of women who delivered singleton live infants in Washington state from 1987-1993, we linked computerized birth certificates and hospital discharge records to investigate the relationship between uterine leiomyomas and complications in pregnancy and delivery. Subjects were 2065 women with uterine leiomyomas noted on computerized hospital discharge records. From the remaining records, a comparison group of women without uterine leiomyomas diagnoses were selected at random and frequency-matched by birth year to women with leiomyomas. We used unconditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of pregnancy or delivery complications in relation to uterine leiomyomas after multivariate adjustment. RESULTS: Women with leiomyomas were more likely than controls to be over age 35 at delivery, nulliparous, or black. We observed independent associations between uterine leiomyomas and abruptio placentae (OR 3. 87, 95% CI 1.63, 9.17), first trimester bleeding (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1. 05, 3.20), dysfunctional labor (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.26, 2.72), and breech presentation (OR 3.98, 95% CI 3.07, 5.16). The risk of cesarean was also higher among women with uterine leiomyomas (OR 6. 39, 95% CI 5.46, 7.50), but a portion of the excess risk might have been due to biased detection of leiomyomas at cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Leiomyomas appear to increase likelihood of complications during pregnancy, labor, and delivery.     

Oral, vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different administration routes of misoprostol for induction of labor. METHOD: PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE searches were carried out using the keywords oral, vaginal, sublingual, buccal, misoprostol, labor induction, identifying randomized case-controlled trials comparing different routes for giving misoprostol to induce labor, published in English between 1994 and 2004. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (3549 participants) were included. Compared to vaginal administration, oral misoprostol was associated with higher failure rates for achieving vaginal delivery within 24 h (odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-2.10), higher rates of uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate (FHR) changes (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.12-4.34) and lower cesarean section rates (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.97). A lower dose of oral misoprostol (50 microg) compared to the 25-50 microg administered vaginally was associated with a higher rate of vaginal delivery not being achieved within 24 h (OR 3.60, 95% CI 2.10-6.18), more need for oxytocin augmentation (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.65-2.92), less uterine hyperstimulation both without FHR changes (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.80) and with FHR changes (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.67) and fewer cesarean sections (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.91). Compared to vaginal administration, buccal misoprostol resulted in a higher rate of failure to achieve vaginal delivery after 24 h, more frequent uterine hyperstimulation and lower rates of cesarean section, but these differences were not significant. When 50 mug of misoprostol used sublingually was compared to oral administration, the sublingual misoprostol was associated with less failure to achieve vaginal delivery after 24 h, less oxytocin augmentation and reduced cesarean section, but none of the differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal misoprostol appears more effective than the equivalent dosage administered orally. However, the vaginal route appears to be associated with a higher risk of uterine hyperstimulation. Sublingual misoprostol seems an effective route of administration, but a lack of data necessitates more clinical trials to establish the effectiveness and safety of the buccal/sublingual route.     

Elective cesarean delivery, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal respiratory distress

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship among gestational age at elective cesarean delivery, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and whether the presence of pre-cesarean delivery labor or ruptured membranes affected the incidence of neonatal respiratory distress. METHODS: A chart review was performed of all elective caesarean deliveries (documented planned in advance) during 1 year, 2004-2005, in the Calgary Health Region; resulting in liveborn infants at or after 36 weeks of gestation and birth weight equal to or greater than 2,500 g. The primary outcomes are relative risk of NICU admission or respiratory distress. RESULTS: A total of 1,193 paired maternal and infant charts were reviewed. Admission rate to the NICU was 156 of 1,195 (13.1%). The most common admitting diagnosis was respiratory distress, 126 of 156 (80%). Male gender was a significant risk factor for admission to the NICU or respiratory distress (odds ratio [OR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-2.60, and OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.33-2.95, respectively). Elective cesarean delivery beyond 270 days of gestational age (38(4/7) weeks) significantly reduced the risk for NICU admission or respiratory distress (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.89, and OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.74, respectively). The presence of spontaneous contractions or rupture of membranes before elective cesarean delivery did not reduce the risk of NICU admission or respiratory distress (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.69-1.62, and OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.60-1.55, respectively). CONCLUSION: Admission to NICU and development of respiratory distress were associated with gestational age at time of elective cesarean delivery and male gender. Awaiting the onset of labor or ruptured membranes did not appear to reduce the risk of NICU admission or neonatal respiratory distress.     

Maternal and neonatal outcome after failed ventouse delivery: comparison of forceps versus cesarean section.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the immediate maternal and neonatal morbidity in women delivered by forceps or cesarean section after failed ventouse delivery. METHODS: Case notes of 400 consecutive successful ventouse deliveries compared with 342 failed ventouse deliveries, where delivery was subsequently achieved with either forceps (N = 247) or cesarean section (N = 95), which took place between October 1999 and May 2003, were reviewed. RESULTS: Failed ventouse delivery was associated with an increased chance for fetal malposition (OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.6 - 5.3) and postpartum hemorrhage (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8 - 6.8). Compared to forceps after failed ventouse, cesarean section was associated with a higher prevalence of postpartum hemorrhage (OR 7.8, 95% CI 3.6 - 16.9) and fewer third degree perineal tears (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between cesarean section and forceps delivery after failed ventouse for neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Failure of ventouse delivery is 3 - 4 times more likely with a fetal malposition and is associated with an increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage. While cesarean section increases the postpartum hemorrhage rate, forceps delivery is associated with increased likelihood of third degree perineal tears. The neonatal morbidity was comparable regardless of whether forceps or cesarean was used after failed ventouse.