Structural organization of parallel information processing within the tectofugal visual system of the pigeon

Visual information processing within the ascending tectofugal pathway to the forebrain undergoes essential rearrangements between the mesencephalic tectum opticum and the diencephalic nucleus rotundus of birds. The outer tectal layers constitute a two-dimensional map of the visual surrounding, whereas nucleus rotundus is characterized by functional domains in which different visual features such as movement, color, or luminance are processed in parallel. Morphologic correlates of this reorganization were investigated by means of focal injections of the neuronal tracer choleratoxin subunit B into different regions of the nuclei rotundus and triangularis of the pigeon. Dependent on the thalamic injection site, variations in the retrograde labeling pattern of ascending tectal efferents were observed. All rotundal projecting neurons were located within the deep tectal layer 13. Five different cell populations were distinguished that could be differentiated according to their dendritic ramifications within different retinorecipient laminae and their axons projecting to different subcomponents of the nucleus rotundus. Because retinorecipient tectal layers differ in their input from distinct classes of retinal ganglion cells, each tectorotundal cell type probably processes different aspects of the visual surrounding. Therefore, the differential input/output connections of the five tectorotundal cell groups might constitute the structural basis for spatially segregated parallel information processing of different stimulus aspects within the tectofugal visual system. Because two of five rotundal projecting cell groups additionally exhibited quantitative shifts along the dorsoventral extension of the tectum, data also indicate visual field-dependent alterations in information processing for particular visual features.     

Nucleus isthmi, pars semilunaris as a key component of the tectofugal visual system in pigeons.

The avian isthmic nuclei are constituted by a group of structures reciprocally connected with the tectum opticum and considered to play a role in the modulation of intratectal processes. Although the two larger isthmic nuclei, the n. isthmi pars parvocellularis (Ipc) and the n. isthmi pars magnocellularis (Imc), have been studied in detail previously, the third and smallest of this group, the n. isthmi pars semilunaris (SLu), has been largely neglected. The present study demonstrates this isthmic component to be characterized by a unique connectivity and immunohistochemical pattern: 1) SLu receives tectal afferents and projects back onto the outer retinorecipient tectal layers; 2) it projects bilaterally onto the nucleus rotundus and thus modulates the ascending tectofugal system; 3) in addition, previous studies have demonstrated SLu projections onto the lateral spiriform nucleus (SpL), which mediates basal ganglia output onto the tectum. In that SpL projects onto the deep layers of the tectum, SLu indirectly modulates descending tectal output patterns. Taken together, the role of SLu goes far beyond a local modulation of intratectal processes. Instead, this isthmic structure is likely to play a key role in the topographically organized modulation of the ascending and, at least indirectly, also the descending projections of the optic tectum.     

Visual-field-specific heterogeneity within the tecto-rotundal projection of the pigeon.

The organization of the tecto-rotundal projection of the pigeon was investigated by means of anterograde and retrograde tracing techniques. Besides the known organization in tecto-rotundal connectivity, this study additionally demonstrates major variations in the ascending projections of different tectal subfields. We show that the ventral tectum opticum (TO) has significantly more projections onto the nucleus rotundus (Rt) than dorsal tectal areas. This difference coincides with differential innervation densities of afferent fibres within rotundal subregions. While ventral tectal efferents project onto the ventral and central Rt, dorsal tectal efferents mainly arborize within limited areas between the central Rt and its dorsal cap, the nucleus triangularis. Thus, the ventral TO, representing the lower and frontal field of view, exhibits a quantitatively and spatially enhanced projection onto the Rt, as compared with the dorsal TO. The data presented here demonstrate a visual field-dependent projection pattern of ascending tectal outputs onto different rotundal domains. The data are consistent with behavioural studies, demonstrating tectofugal lesions to suppress visual stimulus analysis mainly within the frontal field of view.     

Morphology,axonal projection pattern,and response types of tectal neurons in plethodontid salamanders. II: Intracellular recording and labeling experiments

In the plethodontid salamanders Plethodon jordani and P. glutinosus, the morphology and axonal projections of 140 tectal neurons and their responses to electrical optic nerve stimulation were determined by intracellular recording and biocytin labeling. Six types of neurons are distinguished morphologically. TO1 neurons have wide dendritic trees that arborize mainly in tectal layers 1 and 3; they project bilaterally to the tegmentum and contralaterally to the medulla oblongata. TO2 neurons have very wide dendritic trees that arborize mainly in layers 2 and 3; axons project bilaterally or unilaterally to the pretectum and thalamus and ipsilaterally to the medulla oblongata. TO3 neurons have very wide and flat dendritic trees confined to layers 3–5; some have the same axonal projection as TO2 neurons, whereas others have descending axons that reach only the level of the cerebellum. TO4 neurons have narrower dendritic trees that arborize in layers 2 and 3; they project to the ipsilateral pretectum, thalamus, and medulla oblongata. TO5 neurons have dendritic trees that arborize in layers 1 and 2 or 1–3 and project bilaterally or unilaterally to the pretectum and thalamus. TO-IN are interneurons, with a number of subtypes with respect to variations in dendritic arborization pattern. TO1–TO5 neurons generally have short latencies of 2–16 ms (average = 8.4 ms) at electrical optic nerve stimulation; first responses are always excitatory, often followed by inhibition. They are likely to be mono- or oligosynaptically driven by retinal afferents. TO-IN interneurons have long latencies of 20–80 ms (average = 38.6 ms) and appear to receive no direct retinal input. With their specific dendritic arborization, consequent dominant retinal input, specific axonal projections, the different types of tectal projection neurons constitute separate ascending and descending visual pathways. Hypotheses are presented regarding the nature of the information processed by these pathways. J. Comp. Neurol. 404:489–504, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Caudal topographic nucleus isthmi and the rostral nontopographic nucleus isthmi in the turtle, Pseudemys scripta

Isthmotectal projections in turtles were examined by making serial section reconstructions of axonal and dendritic arborizations that were anterogradely or retrogradely filled with HRP. Two prominent tectal-recipient isthmic nuclei--the caudal magnocellular nucleus isthmi (Imc) and the rostral magnocellular nucleus isthmi (Imr)--exhibited strikingly different patterns of organization. Imc cells have flattened, bipolar dendritic fields that cover a few percent of the area of the cell plate constituting the nucleus and they project topographically to the ipsilateral tectum without local axon branches. The topography was examined explicitly at the single-cell level by using cases with two injections at widely separated tectal loci. Each Imc axon terminates as a compact swarm of several thousand boutons placed mainly in the upper central gray and superficial gray layers. One Imc terminal spans less that 1% of the tectal surface. Imr cells, by contrast, have large, sparsely branched dendritic fields overlapped by local axon collaterals while distally, their axons nontopographically innervate not only the deeper layers of the ipsilateral tectum but also ipsilateral Imc. Imr receives a nontopographic tectal input that contrasts with the topographic tectal input to Imc. Previous work on nucleus isthmi emphasized the role of the contralateral isthmotectal projection (which originates from a third isthmic nucleus in turtles) in mediating binocular interactions in the tectum. The present results on the two different but overlapping ipsilateral tecto-isthmo-tectal circuits set up by Imc and Imr are discussed in the light of physiological evidence for selective attention effects and local-global interactions in the tectum.     

Axon terminals from the nucleus isthmi pars parvocellularis control the ascending retinotectofugal output through direct synaptic contact with tectal ganglion cell dendrites

The optic tectum in birds and its homologue the superior colliculus in mammals both send major bilateral, nontopographic projections to the nucleus rotundus and caudal pulvinar, respectively. These projections originate from widefield tectal ganglion cells (TGCs) located in layer 13 in the avian tectum and in the lower superficial layers in the mammalian colliculus. The TGCs characteristically have monostratified arrays of brush‐like dendritic terminations and respond mostly to bidimensional motion or looming features. In birds, this TGC‐mediated tectofugal output is controlled by feedback signals from the nucleus isthmi pars parvocellularis (Ipc). The Ipc neurons display topographically organized axons that densely ramify in restricted columnar terminal fields overlapping various neural elements that could mediate this tectofugal control, including the retinal terminals and the TGC dendrites themselves. Whether the Ipc axons make synaptic contact with these or other tectal neural elements remains undetermined. We double labeled Ipc axons and their presumptive postsynaptic targets in the tectum of chickens (Gallus gallus) with neural tracers and performed an ultrastructural analysis. We found that the Ipc terminal boutons form glomerulus‐like structures in the superficial and intermediate tectal layers, establishing asymmetric synapses with several dendritic profiles. In these glomeruli, at least two of the postsynaptic dendrites originated from TGCs. We also found synaptic contacts between retinal terminals and TGC dendrites. These findings suggest that, in birds, Ipc axons control the ascending tectal outflow of retinal signals through direct synaptic contacts with the TGCs. J. Comp. Neurol. 524:362–379, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Projections of the retinorecipient pretectal nuclei in the pigeon (Columba livia)

We have used anterograde autoradiographic and retrograde HRP techniques to investigate the efferent connections of the retinorecipient pretectal nuclei in the pigeon. In the accompanying paper we identified these nuclei in the pigeon as the nucleus lentiformis mesencephali--pars lateralis and pars medialis, the tectal gray, the area pretectalis, and pretectalis diffusus. Although there are reports of a few of the projections of these nuclei, they had not previously been the subject of a detailed study. We found that different cell types in the lentiformis mesencephali, pars medialis and the lentiformis mesencephali, pars lateralis have descending projections to different targets. These targets include the inferior olive, the cerebellum, the lateral pontine nucleus, the nucleus papillioformis, the nucleus of the basal optic root, the nucleus mesencephalicus profundus, pars ventralis, the nucleus principalis precommissuralis, and the stratum cellulare externum. We found that a few cells in the lentiformis mesencephali project to the medial pontine nucleus, but that a much heavier projection arises from the nucleus laminaris precommissuralis, which is medial to the nucleus lentiformis mesencephali, pars medialis. The tectal gray has predominantly ascending projections to the diencephalon. The nuclei that it projects to are the nucleus intercalatus thalami, the nucleus of the ventral supraoptic decussation, the nucleus posteroventralis, the ventral lateral geniculate nucleus, the nucleus dorsolateralis medialis, and the nucleus dorsolateralis anterior. The tectal gray also projects topographically to layers 4 and 8-13 of the optic tectum. Area pretectalis has both ascending and descending projections. It has ipsilateral ascending projections to the nucleus dorsolateralis anterior, pars magnocellularis, the nucleus lateralis anterior, and the nucleus ventrolateralis thalami. It has ipsilateral descending projections to the central gray, the nucleus of the basal optic root, pars dorsalis, the lateral pontine nucleus, and the deep layers of the optic tectum. It has contralateral projections to the area pretectalis, the nucleus Campi Foreli, the interstitial nucleus of Cajal, the nucleus of Darkschewitsch, the cerebellum, and the Edinger-Westphal nucleus. The efferent projections of pretectalis diffusus are limited. It projects contralaterally to the pretectalis diffusus, and ipsilaterally to the nucleus of the ventral supraoptic decussation, the lateral pons, and the cerebellum.4     

Parallel organization of the avian sensorimotor arcopallium: Tectofugal visual pathway in the pigeon (Columba livia)

The sensory–motor division of the avian arcopallium receives parallel inputs from primary and high-order pallial areas of sensory and vocal control pathways, and sends a prominent descending projection to ascending and premotor, subpallial stages of these pathways. While this organization is well established for the auditory and trigeminal systems, the arcopallial subdivision related to the tectofugal visual system and its descending projection to the optic tectum (TeO) has been less investigated. In this study, we charted the arcopallial area displaying tectofugal visual responses and by injecting neural tracers, we traced its connectional anatomy. We found visual motion-sensitive responses in a central region of the dorsal (AD) and intermediate (AI) arcopallium, in between previously described auditory and trigeminal zones. Blocking the ascending tectofugal sensory output, canceled these visual responses in the arcopallium, verifying their tectofugal origin. Injecting PHA-L into the visual, but not into the auditory AI, revealed a massive projection to tectal layer 13 and other tectal related areas, sparing auditory, and trigeminal ones. Conversely, CTB injections restricted to TeO retrogradely labeled neurons confined to the visual AI. These results show that the AI zone receiving tectofugal inputs sends top-down modulations specifically directed to tectal targets, just like the auditory and trigeminal AI zones project back to their respective subpallial sensory and premotor areas, as found by previous studies. Therefore, the arcopallium seems to be organized in a parallel fashion, such that in spite of expected cross-modal integration, the different sensory–motor loops run through separate subdivisions of this structure.     

Tectal efferents in the banded water snake,Natrix sipedon

Visual information reaches the dorsal thalamus by two distinct routes in most reptiles. Retinal efferents terminate directly in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (DLGN). Retinal information is also channeled indirectly through the tectum to nucleus rotundus. Retinal projections to DLGN and tectum are also well esablished in snakes, but the status of the tecto-rotundal link of the indirect visual pathway is uncertain. Thus, tectal efferents were studied with Fink-Heimer methods in banded water snakes (Natrix sipedon). The tectum gives rise to crossed and uncrossed projections to the brainstem reticular formation. Commissural connections are effected with the contralateral tectum via the tectal and osterior commissures. tectum projects densely to the ipsilateral basal optic nucleus. Bilateral ascending projections reach the pretectal area, nucleus lentiformis mesencephali, lateral habenular nuclei, and posterodorsal nuclei. Ascending projections reach the ventral lateral geniculate and suprapeduncular nuclei. there is a diffuse projection to the central part of the caudal thalamus and a dense, bilaternal projection to the DLGN. These results indicate that the relation of the tectum to the dorsal thalamus is different in snakes than in other reptiles. Nucleus rotundus is either absent or poorly differentiated and there is a strong convergence of the direct and indirect visual pathways at DLGN.     

Responses of the optic tectum to telencephalic stimulation in catfish

In order to test physiologically for cerebrotectal connections in a fish, averaged evoked potentials and unit responses were recorded from the optic tectum following electrical stimulation applied to the telencephalon in the siluroid teleost Ictalurus nebulosus. A single shock applied to the area dorsalis centralis (Dc) of the telencephalon, and only to this area, elicits a sequence of deflections in the ipsilateral optic tectum: an initial negative peak at about 8 ms, (= N8), a larger N25 and a slow P50-N95. The configurations, depth profiles, latencies and susceptibility to repetitive stimulation, together with the known tectal anatomy, suggest that the first wave is due to the afferent fibers from the telencephalon and that N25 is due to deep tectal neurons. Telencephalic input exerts a conditioning effect on the field potentials and unit responses evoked by direct optic nerve shock. Such a shock elicits, in the contralateral tectum, small negative, optic tract axon peaks followed by a large N6, believed to be postsynaptic, and a still later P12. As a first approximation it is argued that the telencephalic input and the retinal input are activating different sets of neuronal elements in the optic tectum, since the configuration and depth profile of the telencephalic and optic nerve shock-elicited potentials are different. A conditioning Dc stimulus has a long-lasting effect on the form of the optic nerve field potential, maximally when the pallial shock precedes the optic by about 90 ms. The effect, observed by subtracting the conditioned from the unconditioned tectal response to optic nerve shock, is a difference wave with N11 and P20. The unit activity from deep tectal laminae is either activated or accelerated following Dc stimulation, while superficially located neurons are not affected. In another group of tectal units, the optic nerve shock-induced response is depressed by a preceding pallial dorsalis centralis stimulus. The evidence is compatible with the assumption of direct projections from Dc to the deep layers of the tectum, but the timing could also permit indirect pathways. In any case, the influence is not simple or identical for different tectal cell classes.     

Neuronal differentiation patterns in the optic tectum of the lizard Gallotia galloti

This study examines in detail the sequences of morphological differentiation and deduces mode of migration into specific layers of all types of neurons present in the optic tectum of the lizard Gallotia galloti. It complements previous similar work on tectal histogenesis in the chick. It was found that the neuronal population diversity in the lizard tectum can be reduced by developmental analysis to three neuroblast classes, called Types I, II and III. These classes correspond closely to those present in the developing avian tectum. Neurons belonging to each developmental class were characterized by their initial polarity, mode of translocation into the mantle layer and pattern of sprouting of primary axonal and dendritic processes. Each class produced along time a subset of the cell types distinguished in the mature tectum. Some aspects of sauropsidian tectal histogenesis are also common of other vertebrates, suggesting that fundamental mechanisms of tectal neuronal differentiation are conserved in tetrapods. Analysis of evolutive differences of tectal structure points to changes affecting the layering and perhaps the population size of specific cell types. Whereas tectal cell-type homology can be easily fundamented on embryological evidence and seems to be consistent with hodological and, to some extent, functional homology, the periventricular, central and superficial strata of the tectum are heterogeneous in cellular composition in different species and therefore represent analogous, rather than homologous entities.     

Observations on the projections and intrinsic organization of the pigeon optic tectum: an autoradiographic study based on anterograde and retrograde, axonal and dendritic flow.

Three aspects of the labelling pattern seen after the injection of 13 different radioactive amino acids into the pigeon optic tectum have been described: The efferent projections of the optic tectum; the specific labelling of two pathways; and the dendritic organisation of tectal layer III neurons based on the retrograde and anterograde movement of label within these dendrites. Discrete injections of tritiated amino acid that involved all or only the superficial tectal layers suggested that layer III gave rise to the massive non-topographically organised and bilateral projections (fibers crossing within the decussato supraoptica ventrlis) upon the nuclei rotundus, subpraetectalis and interstitio-praetecto-subpraetectalis and to the ipsilaterally directed pathways terminating within the nuclei praetectalis, triangularis, subrotundus, dorsolateralis anterior thalami, posteroventralis and ventrolateralis thalami. Layer III neurons may also be the source of efferents to the posterior dorsolateral thalamus (the layer III pathway), the pontine grey and, bilaterally to the reticular formation and of the layer IV or tectal commisural pathway terminating within the contralateral tectal cortex. In contrast projections originating from layer II were generally topographically organised and terminated either within certain of the isthmic nuclei (n. isthmi pars parvocellularis, n. isthmo-opticus and n. semilunaris) or ran within layer I (layer I pathways) to end in the pretectum (griseum tectale) and ventral thalamus (n. ventrolateralis thalami, n. geniculatus, pars ventralis). A small projection from layer II upon the ipsilateral nucleus rotundus may also be present. Triated serine and tyrosine were found to be particularly effective in labeling perikarya as well as axons and terminals. The layer I pathway could be selectively labelled after tectal injections of 3H-GABA while the cell bodies of Ipc neurons were labelled in a retrograde fashion after tectal injections of 3H-glycine, serine or alanine. Intrinsic tectal labelling was found by correlation with Golgi material to reflect both anterograde and retrograde transport of label within dendrites of layer III cells. Anterograde movement of label indicated that the terminal portions of layer III cell dendrites ended in an orderly radial arrangement within sublayers IIb and IId, while the retrograde movement of label resulted in the labelin of layer III perikarya outside the injection field.     

Connections of eye-saccade-related areas within mesencephalic reticular formation with the optic tectum in goldfish

Physiological studies demonstrate that separate sites within the mesencephalic reticular formation (MRF) can evoke eye saccades with different preferred directions. Furthermore, anatomical research suggests that a tectoreticulotectal circuit organized in accordance with the tectal eye movement map is present. However, whether the reticulotectal projection shifts with the gaze map present in the MRF is unknown. We explored this question in goldfish, by injecting biotin dextran amine within MRF sites that evoked upward, downward, oblique, and horizontal eye saccades. Then, we analyzed the labeling in the optic tectum. The main findings can be summarized as follows. 1) The MRF and the optic tectum were connected by separate axons of the tectobulbar tract. 2) The MRF was reciprocally connected mainly with the ipsilateral tectal lobe, but also with the contralateral one. 3) The MRF received projections chiefly from neurons located within intermediate and deep tectal layers. In addition, the MRF projections terminated primarily within the intermediate tectal layer. 4) The distribution of labeled neurons in the tectum shifted with the different MRF sites in a manner consistent with the tectal motor map. The area containing these cells was targeted by a high-density reticulotectal projection. In addition to this high-density topographic projection, there was a low-density one spread throughout the tectum. 5) Occasionally, boutons were observed adjacent to tectal labeled neurons. We conclude that the organization of the reticulotectal circuit is consistent with the functional topography of the MRF and that the MRF participates in a tectoreticulotectal feedback circuit.     

Ascending pathways from the monkey superior colliculus: An autoradiographic analysis

The autoradiographic tracing method has been used to analyze the distribution of ascending tectofugal pathways in the rhesus monkey. Our findings show that axons which arise from deep collicular neurons terminate within several dorsal thalamic nuclei which in turn project upon the frontal eye fields (area 8) and the inferior parietal lobule (area 7). Both of these cortical areas are functionally quite similar to the deep colliculus, and we suggest that ascending channels from the deep tectum must account, at least in part, for these functional similarities. The present autoradiographs reveal projections to several nuclear zones previously not identified as deep collicular targets in the monkey. Such targets include the visceral cell columns of the oculomotor complex, the rostral interstitial nucleus of the medial longitudinal fasciculus, and the magnocellular division of the ventral anterior nucleus. Deep tectal input also has been shown to terminate quite extensively within the paralamellar region of the mediodorsal nucleus and in the parafascicular nucleus; very little input to the central lateral and centromedian nuclei was observed. Radioisotope injections restricted to the superficial layers reveal dense projections to the parabigeminal nucleus, the pretectum, the inferior and lateral pulvinar nuclei, and to the ventral and dorsal lateral geniculate nuclei. Transported protein within the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus occupied the “S” layers and the interlaminar zones.     

Cytoarchitecture of the tectum mesencephali in salamanders: a Golgi and HRP study.

The tectum mesencephali of salamanders shows a morphology that has long been considered primitive when compared with that of frogs. The alternative hypothesis is that the salamander brain is secondarily simplified. In order to test these two hypotheses, the cytoarchitecture of the tectum and the projections of tectal neurons were studied in 11 species of salamanders. Application of the Golgi method reveals three major morphological types. Type 1 has a very wide dendritic arborization mostly confined to the deep fiber layers, and somata are always located within the most superficial part of the periventricular gray matter. Type 2 possesses a wide to medium-size dendritic arborization. In subtype 2a the somata are located in the uppermost part of the gray, and dendrites always reach the uppermost layer of retinal afferents; in subtype 2b the somata are found in deeper parts of the gray, and dendrites arborize in the deeper layers of retinal afferents; and in subtype 2c the somata are also located in deeper parts, but the wide dendritic arborization is confined to deep fiber layers. Type 3 shows the narrowest dendritic arbors that always reach the upper two tectal fiber layers. The somata are found at any depth of the gray matter. HRP experiments reveal a correlation between morphological differences and the projections of tectal neurons. Type 1- and type 2c-like cells constitute the uncrossed tecto-bulbo-spinal tract, whereas type 1- and type 2a-like cells and migrated large spindle-shaped cells (Salamandra) constitute the crossed tecto-bulbo-spinal tract. Type 3-like neurons project to thalamic, pretectal, and isthmic termination sites. The HRP experiments also demonstrate the existence of two classes of mesencephalic trigeminal cells. A comparison shows that salamanders and frogs possess very similar functional and morphological types of tectal cells. However, tectal cells of salamanders show a "juvenile" morphology, and the number of migrated cells is about 10 times higher in frogs compared to salamanders. Both phenomena are seen as the result of secondary simplification of brain structures in the context of paedomorphosis.     

Morphology,axonal projection pattern,and response types of tectal neurons in plethodontid salamanders. I: Tracer study of projection neurons and their pathways

In three salamander species (Hydromantes italicus, H. genei, Plethodon jordani), the tectobulbospinal and tectothalamic pathways and their cells of origin were studied by means of anterograde and retrograde biocytin and tetramethylrhodamine tracing. In plethodontid salamanders, five types of tectal projection neurons were identified. TO1 neurons have widefield dendritic trees that arborize in the layers of retinal afferents and form a neuropil in the superficial layer; axons constitute the crossed tectospinal tract. Dendrites of TO2 cells have the largest dendritic trees that arborize in the intermediate and deep layers of retinal afferents; axons constitute a lateral uncrossed tectospinal tract. TO3 cells have widefield dendritic trees that arborize in the deep layer of retinal afferents and in the layer of tectal efferents; axons constitute a superficial uncrossed tectospinal tract. TO4 cells have slender primary dendrites and small-field dendritic trees that arborize in the intermediate layers of retinal afferents; axons constitute another lateral uncrossed tectospinal tract. TO2, TO3, and TO4 cells also have ascending axons that run to the ventral and dorsal thalamus. TO5 cells have slender primary dendrites and small-field dendritic trees that extend into the superficial layers of retinal afferents; their fine axons constitute the bulk of the pathways ascending to the ipsilateral and contralateral thalamus. These morphological types of projection neurons and their ascending and descending axonal pathways closely resemble those found in frogs, reptiles, and birds. Their role in visual and visuomotor functions is discussed. J. Comp. Neurol. 404:473–488, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

The development of the nucleus isthmi in Xenopus laevis. I. Cell genesis and the formation of connections with the tectum

The nucleus isthmi (NI) of the amphibian relays visual input from one tectum to the other tectum and thus brings a visual map from the eye to the ipsilateral tectum. This isthmotectal visual map develops slowly; it is first detected electrophysiologically at stages 60-62, the age at which the eyes begin their dorsalward migration and the region of binocular overlap beings to increase in extent. During this critical period of life, normal binocular visual input is required for establishment of normal topographic isthmotectal projections. In this study, we have used anatomical methods to trace cell birth, cell death, and formation of connections by the nucleus isthmi during the critical period. Tritiated thymidine labelling demonstrates that cells in the nucleus isthmi are generated throughout most of tadpole life (stages 29-62). Most cells conform to an orderly ventrodorsal gradient starting from stage 29 and extending to stages 56; later cells are inserted at apparently random locations in the nucleus. We have re-examined the hypothesis of Tay and Straznicky ('80) that the order of cell genesis in the NI and tectum could help establish proper isthmotectal connections, and we find that a timing mechanisms does not explain the two-dimensional topography of the isthmotectal map but that timing may aid in proper mediolateral positioning of isthmotectal axons at the points where they first enter the tectum. Horseradish peroxidase labelling was used to investigate whether anatomical projections from tectum to NI and from NI to tectum are present prior to the onset of eye migration. The results show that there are tectoisthmotectal projections by stage 52. Moreover, isthmotectal axons grow into as yet monocular tectal regions prior to the onset of eye migration. At stage 60, when binocular overlap begins, isthmotectal axons are visible throughout the tectum but are densely branched only at the rostral tectal margin, the location where they are predicted to occur on the basis of electrophysiological maps.