Pharmacological profile of histaprodifens at four recombinant histamine H1 receptor species isoforms

There are differences in the pharmacological properties of phenylhistamines and histaprodifens between guinea pig histamine H(1) receptor (gpH(1)R) and human histamine H(1) receptor (hH(1)R). The aim of this study was to analyze species differences in more detail, focusing on histaprodifen derivatives and including the bovine histamine H(1) receptor (bH(1)R) and rat histamine H(1) receptor (rH(1)R). H(1)R species isoforms were coexpressed with the regulator of G protein signaling RGS4 in Sf9 insect cells. We performed [(3)H]mepyramine binding assays and steady-state GTPase assays. For a novel class of histaprodifens, the chiral histaprodifens, unique species differences between hH(1)R, bH(1)R, rH(1)R, and gpH(1)R were observed. The chiral histaprodifens 8R and 8S were both partial agonists at gpH(1)R, but only 8R was a partial agonist at the other H(1)R species isoforms. An additional phenyl group in chiral histaprodifens 10R and 10S, respectively, resulted in a switch from agonism at gpH(1)Rto antagonism at hH(1)R, bH(1)R, and rH(1)R. In general, histaprodifens showed the order of potency hH(1)R < bH(1)R < rH(1)R < gpH(1)R. An active-state model of gpH(1)R was generated with molecular dynamics simulations. Dimeric histaprodifen was docked into the binding pocket of gpH(1)R. Hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions were detected between dimeric histaprodifen and Asp-116, Ser-120, Lys-187, Glu-190, and Tyr-432. We conclude the following: 1) chiral histaprodifens interact differentially with H(1)R species isoforms; 2) gpH(1)R and rH(1)R, on one hand, and hH(1)R and bH(1)R, on the other hand, resemble each other structurally and pharmacologically; and 3) histaprodifens interact with H(1)R at multiple sites.     

Multiple differences in agonist and antagonist pharmacology between human and guinea pig histamine H1-receptor

Species isoforms of histamine H2-, H3-, and H4-receptors differ in their pharmacological properties. The study aim was to dissect differences between the human H1R (hH1R) and guinea pig H1R (ghH1R). We coexpressed hH1R and gpH1R with regulators of G-protein signaling in Sf9 insect cells and analyzed the GTPase activity of Gq-proteins. Small H1R agonists showed similar effects at hH1R and gpH1R, whereas bulkier 2-phenylhistamines and histaprodifens were up to approximately 10-fold more potent at gpH1R than at hH1R. Most 2-phenylhistamines and histaprodifens were more efficacious at gpH1R than at hH1R. Several first-generation H1R antagonists were approximately 2-fold, and arpromidine-type H1R antagonists up to approximately 10-fold more potent at gpH1R than at hH1R. [3H]Mepyramine competition binding studies confirmed the potency differences of the GTPase studies. Phe-153-->Leu-153 or Ile-433-->Val-433 exchange in hH1R (hH1R-->gpH1R) resulted in poor receptor expression, low [3H]mepyramine affinity, and functional inactivity. The Phe-153-->Leu-153/Ile-433-->Val-433 double mutant expressed excellently but only partially changed the pharmacological properties of hH1R. Small H1R agonists and 2-phenylhistamines interacted differentially with human and guinea pig H2R in terms of potency and efficacy, respectively. Our data show the following: 1) there are differences in agonist- and antagonist-pharmacology of hH1R and gpH1R encompassing diverse classes of bulky ligands. These differences may be explained by higher conformational flexibility of gpH1R relative to hH1R; 2) Phe-153 and Ile-433 are critical for proper folding and expression of hH1R; and 3) H2R species isoforms distinguish between H1R agonists.     

Differential efficacies of somatostatin receptor agonists for G-protein activation and desensitization of somatostatin receptor subtype 4-mediated responses

Both the histamine H1-receptor (H1R) and H2-receptor (H2R) exhibit pronounced species selectivity in their pharmacological properties; i.e., bulky agonists possess higher potencies and efficacies at guinea pig (gp) than at the corresponding human (h) receptor isoforms. In this study, we examined the effects of NG-acylated imidazolylpropylguanidines substituted with a single phenyl or cyclohexyl substituent on H1R and H2R species isoforms expressed in Sf9 insect cells. N1-(3-Cyclohexylbutanoyl)-N2-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl]guanidine (UR-AK57) turned out to be the most potent hH2R agonist identified so far (EC50 of 23 nM in the GTPase assay at the hH2R-Gsalpha fusion protein expressed in Sf9 insect cells). UR-AK57 was almost a full-hH2R agonist and only slightly less potent and efficacious than at gpH2R-Gsalpha. Several NG-acylated imidazolylpropylguanidines showed similar potency at hH2R and gpH2R. Most unexpectedly, UR-AK57 exhibited moderately strong partial hH1R agonism with a potency similar to that of histamine, whereas at gpH1R, UR-AK57 was only a very weak partial agonist. Structure/activity relationship studies revealed that both the alkanoyl chain connecting the aromatic or alicyclic substituent with the guanidine moiety and the nature of the carbocycle (cyclohexyl versus phenyl ring) critically determine the pharmacological properties of this class of compounds. Collectively, our data show that gpH1R and gpH R do not necessarily exhibit preference for bulky agonists (2) compared with hH1R and hH2R, respectively, and that UR-AK57 is a promising starting point for the development of both potent and efficacious hH1R and hH2R agonists.     

Probing ligand-specific histamine H1- and H2-receptor conformations with NG-acylated Imidazolylpropylguanidines

Impromidine (IMP) and arpromidine (ARP)-derived guanidines are more potent and efficacious guinea pig (gp) histamine H(2)-receptor (gpH(2)R) than human (h) H(2)R agonists and histamine H(1)-receptor (H(1)R) antagonists with preference for hH(1)R relative to gpH(1)R. We examined N(G)-acylated imidazolylpropylguanidines (AIPGs), which are less basic than guanidines, at hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, rat H(2)R (rH(2)R), hH(1)R, and gpH(1)R expressed in Sf9 cells as probes for ligand-specific receptor conformations. AIPGs were similarly potent H(2)R agonists as the corresponding guanidines IMP and ARP, respectively. Exchange of pyridyl in ARP against phenyl increased AIPG potency 10-fold, yielding the most potent agonists at the hH(2)R-G(salpha) fusion protein and gpH(2)R-G(salpha) identified so far. Some AIPGs were similarly potent and efficacious at hH(2)R-G(salpha) and gpH(2)R-G(salpha). AIPGs stabilized the ternary complex in hH(2)R-G(salpha) and gpH(2)R-G(salpha) differently than the corresponding guanidines. Guanidines, AIPGs, and small H(2)R agonists exhibited distinct agonist properties at hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, and rH(2)R measuring adenylyl cyclase activity. In contrast to ARP and IMP, AIPGs were partial H(1)R agonists exhibiting higher efficacies at hH(1)R than at gpH(1)R. This is remarkable because, so far, all bulky H(1)R agonists exhibited higher efficacies at gpH(1)R than at hH(1)R. Collectively, our data suggest that AIPGs stabilize different active conformations in hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, and rH(2)R than guanidines and that, in contrast to guanidines, AIPGs are capable of stabilizing a partially active state of hH(1)R.     

Constitutive activity and ligand selectivity of human, guinea pig, rat, and canine histamine H2 receptors

Previous studies revealed pharmacological differences between human and guinea pig histamine H(2) receptors (H(2)Rs) with respect to the interaction with guanidine-type agonists. Because H(2)R species variants are structurally very similar, comparative studies are suited to relate different properties of H(2)R species isoforms to few molecular determinants. Therefore, we systematically compared H(2)Rs of human (h), guinea pig (gp), rat (r), and canine (c). Fusion proteins of hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, rH(2)R, and cH(2)R, respectively, and the short splice variant of G(salpha), G(salphaS), were expressed in Sf9 insect cells. In the membrane steady-state GTPase activity assay, cH(2)R-G(salphaS) but neither gpH(2)R-G(salphaS) nor rH(2)R-G(salphaS) showed the hallmarks of increased constitutive activity compared with hH(2)R-G(salphaS), i.e., increased efficacies of partial agonists, increased potencies of agonists with the extent of potency increase being correlated with the corresponding efficacies at hH(2)R-G(salphaS), increased inverse agonist efficacies, and decreased potencies of antagonists. Furthermore, in membranes expressing nonfused H(2)Rs without or together with mammalian G(salphaS) or H(2)R-G(salpha) fusion proteins, the highest basal and GTP-dependent increases in adenylyl cyclase activity were observed for cH(2)R. An example of ligand selectivity is given by metiamide, acting as an inverse agonist at hH(2)R-G(salphaS), gpH(2)R-G(salphaS), and rH(2)R-G(salphaS) in the GTPase assay in contrast to being a weak partial agonist with decreased potency at cH(2)R-G(salphaS). In conclusion, the cH(2)R exhibits increased constitutive activity compared with hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, and rH(2)R, and there is evidence for ligand-specific conformations in H(2)R species isoforms.     

Mutations of Cys-17 and Ala-271 in the human histamine H2 receptor determine the species selectivity of guanidine-type agonists and increase constitutive activity

In a steady-state GTPase activity assay, N-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl)]guanidines and N(G)-acylated derivatives are more potent and efficacious at fusion proteins of guinea pig (gpH(2)R-G(salphaS)) than human (hH(2)R-G(salphaS)) histamine H(2) receptor, coupled to the short splice variant of G(salpha), G(salphaS). Whereas Ala-271 (hH(2)R) and Asp-271 (gpH(2)R) in transmembrane domain 7 were identified to determine the potency differences of guanidine-type agonists, the molecular basis for the efficacy differences remains to be elucidated. A homology model of the gpH(2)R suggested that an H-bond between Tyr-17 and Asp-271 stabilizes an active receptor conformation of the gpH(2)R. In the present study, we generated a mutant hH(2)R-G(salphaS) with Cys-17--> Tyr-17/Ala-271--> Asp-271 exchanges (hH(2)R-->gpH(2)R) that exhibited an enhanced level of constitutive GTPase activity and adenylyl cyclase activity compared with wild-type hH(2)R-G(salphaS) and gpH(2)R-G(salphaS). Potencies and efficacies of guanidines and N(G)-acylguanidines were increased at this mutant receptor compared with hH(2)R-G(salphaS), but they were still lower than at gpH(2)R-G(salphaS), suggesting that aside from Tyr-17 and Asp-271 additional amino acids contribute to the distinct pharmacological profiles of both species isoforms. Another hH(2)R-G(salphaS) mutant with a Cys-17--> Tyr-17 exchange showed inefficient coupling to G(salphaS) as revealed by reduced agonist-stimulated GTPase and basal adenylyl cyclase activities. Collectively, our present pharmacological study confirms the existence of an H-bond between Tyr-17 and Asp-271 favoring the stabilization of an active receptor conformation. Distinct potencies and efficacies of agonists and inverse agonists further support the concept of ligand-specific conformations in wild-type and mutant H(2)R-G(salphaS) fusion proteins.     

Evaluation of histamine H1-, H2-, and H3-receptor ligands at the human histamine H4 receptor: identification of 4-methylhistamine as the first potent and selective H4 receptor agonist

The histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R) is involved in the chemotaxis of leukocytes and mast cells to sites of inflammation and is suggested to be a potential drug target for asthma and allergy. So far, selective H(4)R agonists have not been identified. In the present study, we therefore evaluated the human H(4)R (hH(4)R) for its interaction with various known histaminergic ligands. Almost all of the tested H(1)R and H(2)R antagonists, including several important therapeutics, displaced less than 30% of specific [(3)H]histamine binding to the hH(4)R at concentrations up to 10 microM. Most of the tested H(2)R agonists and imidazole-based H(3)R ligands show micromolar-to-nanomolar range hH(4)R affinity, and these ligands exert different intrinsic hH(4)R activities, ranging from full agonists to inverse agonists. Interestingly, we identified 4-methylhistamine as a high-affinity H(4)R ligand (K(i) = 50 nM) that has a >100-fold selectivity for the hH(4)R over the other histamine receptor subtypes. Moreover, 4-methylhistamine potently activated the hH(4)R (pEC(50) = 7.4 +/- 0.1; alpha = 1), and this response was competitively antagonized by the selective H(4)R antagonist JNJ 7777120 [1-[(5-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)-carbonyl]-4-methylpiperazine] (pA(2) = 7.8). The identification of 4-methylhistamine as a potent H(4)R agonist is of major importance for future studies to unravel the physiological roles of the H(4)R.     

An 80-amino acid deletion in the third intracellular loop of a naturally occurring human histamine H3 isoform confers pharmacological differences and constitutive activity

In this article, we pharmacologically characterized two naturally occurring human histamine H3 receptor (hH3R) isoforms, hH3R(445) and hH3R(365). These abundantly expressed splice variants differ by a deletion of 80 amino acids in the intracellular loop 3. In this report, we show that the hH3R(365) is differentially expressed compared with the hH3R(445) and has a higher affinity and potency for H3R agonists and conversely a lower potency and affinity for H3R inverse agonists. Furthermore, we show a higher constitutive signaling of the hH3R(365) compared with the hH3R(445) in both guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio) triphosphate binding and cAMP assays, likely explaining the observed differences in hH3R pharmacology of the two isoforms. Because H3R ligands are beneficial in animal models of obesity, epilepsy, and cognitive diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and currently entered clinical trails, these differences in H3R pharmacology of these two isoforms are of great importance for a detailed understanding of the action of H3R ligands.     

Differential actions of antiparkinson agents at multiple classes of monoaminergic receptor. I. A multivariate analysis of the binding profiles of 14 drugs at 21 native and cloned human receptor subtypes

Because little comparative information is available concerning receptor profiles of antiparkinson drugs, affinities of 14 agents were determined at diverse receptors implicated in the etiology and/or treatment of Parkinson's disease: human (h)D(1), hD(2S), hD(2L), hD(3), hD(4), and hD(5) receptors; human 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1A), h5-HT(1B), h5-HT(1D), h5-HT(2A), h5-HT(2B), and h5-HT(2C) receptors; halpha(1A)-, halpha(1B)-, halpha(1D)-, halpha(2A)-, halpha(2B)-, halpha(2C)-, rat alpha(2D)-, hbeta(1)-, and hbeta(2)-adrenoceptors (ARs); and native histamine(1) receptors. A correlation matrix (294 pK(i) values) demonstrated substantial "covariance". Correspondingly, principal components analysis revealed that axis 1, which accounted for 76% variance, was associated with the majority of receptor types: drugs displaying overall high versus modest affinities migrated at opposite extremities. Axis 2 (7% of variance) differentiated drugs with high affinity for hD(4) and H(1) receptors versus halpha(1)-AR subtypes. Five percent of variance was attributable to axis 3, which distinguished drugs with marked affinity for hbeta(1)- and hbeta(2)-ARs versus hD(5) and 5-HT(2A) receptors. Hierarchical (cluster) analysis of global homology generated a dendrogram differentiating two major groups possessing low versus high affinity, respectively, for multiple serotonergic and hD(5) receptors. Within the first group, quinpirole, quinerolane, ropinirole, and pramipexole interacted principally with hD(2), hD(3), and hD(4) receptors, whereas piribedil and talipexole recognized dopaminergic receptors and halpha(2)-ARs. Within the second group, lisuride and terguride manifested high affinities for all sites, with roxindole/bromocriptine, cabergoline/pergolide, and 6,7-dihydroxy-N,N-dimethyl-2-ammotetralin (TL99)/apomorphine comprising three additional subclusters of closely related ligands. In conclusion, an innovative multivariate analysis revealed marked heterogeneity in binding profiles of antiparkinson agents. Actions at sites other than hD(2) receptors likely participate in their (contrasting) functional profiles.     

Pharmacological control of the human gastric histamine H2 receptor by famotidine: comparison with H1, H2 and H3 receptor agonists and antagonists

Histamine 0.1 microM-0.1 mM increased adenylate cyclase activity five- to ten-fold in human fundic membranes, with a potency Ka = 3 microM. The histamine dose-response curve was mimicked by the H3 receptor agonist (R) alpha-MeHA, but at 100 times lower potency, Ka = 0.3 mM. Histamine-induced adenylate cyclase activation was abolished by H2, H1 and H3 receptor antagonists, according to the following order of potency IC50: famotidine (0.3 microM) greater than triprolidine (0.1 mM) thioperamide (2 mM), respectively. Famotidine has no action on membrane components activating the adenylate cyclase system, including the Gs subunit of the enzyme stimulated by forskolin and cell surface receptors sensitive to isoproterenol (beta 2-type), PGE2 and VIP. The Schild plot was linear for famotidine (P less than 0.01) with a regression coefficient r = 0.678. The slope of the regression line was 0.64 and differs from unity. Accordingly, famotidine showed a slow onset of inhibition and dissociation from the H2 receptor in human cancerous HGT-1 cells. The results demonstrate that famotidine is a potent and selective H2 receptor antagonist with uncompetitive actions in human gastric mucosa. Consequently, famotidine might be a suitable drug with long-lasting actions in the treatment of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. The results also confirm and extend the previous observations that (R) alpha-MeHA and thioperamide are two selective ligands at histamine H3 receptor sites. In the human gastric mucosa, these drugs are respectively 330 and 6700 times less potent than histamine and famotidine on the adenylate cyclase system. The possible involvement of histamine H3 receptors in the regulation of gastric secretion is proposed.     

Inhibition of 3H-leukotriene D4 binding to guinea pig lung receptors by the novel leukotriene antagonist ICI 198,615

The specific binding of [3H]5(S)hydroxy-6(R)-S-cysteinylglycyl -7(E),9(E),11(Z),14(Z)-eicosatetraenoic acid ([3H]LTD4) to receptors on guinea pig lung parenchymal membranes and its inhibition by ICI 198,615, a representative example of a new class of leukotriene antagonists, was characterized by a receptor-ligand binding assay. [3H]LTD4 bound specifically and rapidly (Kon = 0.29 +/- 0.6 nM-1.min-1) reaching equilibrium within 15 min. The rate of binding was greatly inhibited in the presence of ICI 198,615. Excess LTD4 or ICI 198,615 slowly (t1/2 = 20 min) dissociated about 70% of the receptor-bound [3H]LTD4, whereas in combination with GTP analogs, both induced a rapid (t1/2 less than 5 min) and full dissociation. Equilibrium saturation analysis of [3H]LTD4 binding demonstrated a saturable (Bmax = 1014 +/- 174 fmol/mg) and high affinity (Kd = 0.43 +/- 0.09 nM) binding site. A high degree of stereoselectivity was demonstrated with inhibition of binding by the stereoisomers of LTD4: S,R much greater than R,R greater than R,S much greater than S,S. The rank order for inhibition of binding by peptide leukotriene was: LTD4 greater than 5(S)-hydroxy-6(R)-S-cysteinyl-7(E),9(E),11(Z),14(Z)-eicosatetraenoic acid much greater than 5(S)hydroxy-6(R)-S-glutathionyl-7(E),9(E),11(Z),14(Z)-eicosatetraenoic acid (potency ratios were: 1:4:590). In competition assays, ICI 198,615 competitively inhibited binding of [3H]LTD4 (Ki = 0.27 +/- 0.16 nM) and was 2300-fold and 3100-fold more potent than LY171883 or FPL55712. These data, together with results obtained previously in functional receptor assays, illustrate that this new class of leukotriene antagonists are the most potent and selective competitive antagonists of LTD4 receptors yet described.     

Characteristics of the dextran-coated charcoal assay for estradiol receptor in breast cancer preparations.

The measurement of E2 receptor (E2R) in human breast cancer cytosol is significantly influenced by conditions usually employed in the dextran-coated charcoal assay. The incubation time and temperature have an influence on the rate of binding and stability of the receptor. Since lower temperatures preserve the integrity of the receptor, a 2 hr incubation at 4 degrees was selected as the standard incubation procedure. These conditions allow for the detection of at least 80% of the E2R. With supernatants from high-speed centrifugation of HBT biopsies or the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7, reducing agents increased the apparent E2R binding in the order: DTT greater than G-SH greater than MTG. The maximum enhancement of specific E2R binding by a given thiol agent was dependent on its concentration in the incubation medium. The optimum DTT level (7.5 mM) for MCF-7 cell homogenization and cytosol equilibration with tritiated E2 increased E2R to two times control (no DTT). For the HBT 150,000 g supernatant, 1 mM DTT was required to optimize the E2R quantitation. The duration of the dextran-coated charcoal extraction of the cytosol-[3H]E2 incubation had no effect on the level of E2R up to 21 hr. Minimum levels of nonspecific binding of [3H]E2 could be obtained after 4 hr extraction. Maximum depletion of specific [3H]E2 binding could be obtained by adding between 200- and 1000-fold molar excess of unlabeled E2. Greater amounts of unlabeled steroid displaced the radioactive E2 from the dextran-coated charcoal, thereby artifactually increasing the apparent nonspecific binding. This phenomenon may be overcome by utilizing more dextran-coated charcoal in the extraction. However, there was a 9% loss of specifically bound [3H]E2 per milligram of dextran-coated charcoal (1:10 dextran to charcoal by weight) when the cytosol protein was below 90 microgram per incubation. Supplementation with 200 microgram or more albumin per incubation prevented this loss. The dextran:charcoal ratio also prevented E2R loss in the order: 1:1 greater than 1:10 greater than 1:100. One milligram of dextran-coated charcoal (1:10) has the capacity to adsorb 0.3 to 0.4 microgram of free E2. Other unlabeled competitors are capable of displacing [3H]E2 on the receptor. Although DES was as effective as E2, U11,100A and estrone were inefficient competitors. It appeared that the levels of these two estrogen analogues required to maximally displace [3H]E2 on receptor also eluted labeled E2 from the dextran-coated charcoal. DES, however, was unable to displace significant quantities of the [3H] E2 from dextran-coated charcoal even at a molar excess of 50,000:1.     

Two novel and selective nonimidazole histamine H3 receptor antagonists A-304121 and A-317920: I. In vitro pharmacological effects

Histamine H3 receptor (H3R) antagonists enhance neurotransmitter release and are being developed for the treatment of a variety of neurological and cognitive disorders. Many potent histamine H3R antagonists contain an imidazole moiety that limits receptor selectivity and the tolerability of this class of compounds. Here we present the in vitro pharmacological data for two novel piperazine amide ligands, A-304121 [4-(3-((2R)-2-aminopropanoyl-1-piperazinyl)propoxy)phenyl)cyclopropylmethanone] and A-317920 [N-((1R)-2-(4-(3-(4-(cyclopropylcarbonyl)phenoxy)propyl)-1-piperazinyl)-1-methyl-2-oxo-ethyl-)-2-furamide], and compare them with the imidazole H3R antagonists ciproxifan, clobenpropit, and thioperamide. Both A-304121 and A-317920 bind potently to recombinant full-length rat H3R(pKi values = 8.6 and 9.2, respectively) but have lower potencies for binding the full-length human H3R (pKi values = 6.1 and 7.0, respectively). A-304121 and A-317920 are potent antagonists at rat H3R in reversing R-alpha-methylhistamine [(R)-alpha-MeHA] inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation (pKb values = 8.0 and 9.1) but weak antagonists at human H3Rs in cyclase (pKb values = 6.0 and 6.3) and calcium mobilization (pKb values = 6.0 and 7.3) assays in cells co-expressing Galphaqi5-protein. Both compounds potently antagonize native H3Rs by blocking histamine inhibition of potassium-evoked [3H]histamine release from rat brain cortical synaptosomes (pKb values = 8.6 and 9.3) and (R)-alpha-MeHA reversal of electric field-stimulated guinea pig ileum contractions (pA2 values = 7.1 and 8.3). A-304121 and A-317920 are also more efficacious inverse agonists in reversing basal guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) binding at the human H3R (pEC50 values = 5.7 and 7.0) than are the imidazole antagonists. These novel and selective piperazine amides represent useful leads for the development of H3R antagonist therapeutic agents.     

Pharmacological properties of ABT-239 [4-(2-{2-[(2R)-2-Methylpyrrolidinyl]ethyl}-benzofuran-5-yl)benzonitrile]: I. Potent and selective histamine H3 receptor antagonist with drug-like properties

Histamine H3 receptor antagonists are being developed to treat a variety of neurological and cognitive disorders that may be ameliorated by enhancement of central neurotransmitter release. Here, we present the in vitro pharmacological and in vivo pharmacokinetic profiles for the nonimidazole, benzofuran ligand ABT-239 [4-(2-{2-[(2R)-2-methylpyrrolidinyl]ethyl}-benzofuran-5-yl)benzonitrile] and compare it with several previously described imidazole and nonimidazole H3 receptor antagonists. ABT-239 binds to recombinant human and rat H3 receptors with high affinity, with pK(i) values of 9.4 and 8.9, respectively, and is over 1000-fold selective versus human H1, H2, and H4 histamine receptors. ABT-239 is a potent H3 receptor antagonist at recombinant human and rat receptors, reversing agonist-induced changes in cAMP formation (pK(b) = 7.9 and 7.6, respectively), guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio) triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding (pK(b) = 9.0 and 8.3, respectively), and calcium mobilization (human pK(b) = 7.9). ABT-239 also competitively reversed histamine-mediated inhibition of [3H]histamine release from rat brain cortical synaptosomes (pK(b) = 7.7) and agonist-induced inhibition of contractile responses in electric field stimulated guinea pig ileal segments (pA2 = 8.7). Additionally, ABT-239 is a potent inverse agonist, inhibiting constitutive [35S]GTPgammaS binding at both rat and human H3 receptors with respective pEC50 values of 8.9 and 8.2. ABT-239 demonstrates good pharmacokinetic characteristics in rat, dog, and monkey with t1/2 values ranging from 4 to 29 h, corresponding with clearance values and metabolic turnover in liver microsomes from these species, and good oral bioavailability ranging from 52 to 89%. Thus, ABT-239 is a selective, nonimidazole H3 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist with similar high potency in both human and rat and favorable drug-like properties.     

N-substituted pyrrole derivatives as novel human immunodeficiency virus type 1 entry inhibitors that interfere with the gp41 six-helix bundle formation and block virus fusion

A recently approved peptidic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) fusion inhibitor, T-20 (Fuzeon; Trimeris Inc.), has shown significant promise in clinical application for treating HIV-1-infected individuals who have failed to respond to the currently available antiretroviral drugs. However, T-20 must be injected twice daily and is too expensive. Therefore, it is essential to develop orally available small molecule HIV-1 fusion inhibitors. By screening a chemical library consisting of "drug-like" compounds, we identified two N-substituted pyrroles, designated NB-2 and NB-64, that inhibited HIV-1 replication at a low micromolar range. The absence of the COOH group in NB-2 and NB-64 resulted in a loss of anti-HIV-1 activity, suggesting that this acid group plays an important role in mediating the antiviral activity. NB-2 and NB-64 inhibited HIV-1 fusion and entry by interfering with the gp41 six-helix bundle formation and disrupting the alpha-helical conformation. They blocked a d-peptide binding to the hydrophobic pocket on surface of the gp41 internal trimeric coiled-coil domain. Computer-aided molecular docking analysis has shown that they fit inside the hydrophobic pocket and that their COOH group interacts with a positively charged residue (K574) around the pocket to form a salt bridge. These results suggest that NB-2 and NB-64 may bind to the gp41 hydrophobic pocket through hydrophobic and ionic interactions and block the formation of the fusion-active gp41 core, thereby inhibiting HIV-1-mediated membrane fusion and virus entry. Therefore, NB-2 and NB-64 can be used as lead compounds toward designing and developing more potent small molecule HIV-1 fusion inhibitors targeting gp41.     

Preliminary mapping of a putative inhibitor-binding pocket for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase inhibitors

Molecular modeling studies have identified a putative human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) integrase (IN) inhibitor-binding pocket for l-chicoric acid (l-CA) and other inhibitors of IN (C. A. Sotriffer, H. Ni, and A. McCammon, J. Med. Chem. 43:4109-4117, 2000). By using site-directed mutagenesis of several amino acid residues identified by modeling studies, a common inhibitor-binding pocket on IN was confirmed for l-CA and the diketo acid L-731,988. Specifically, the single mutations E92K, Q148A, K156A, K156R, G140S, and G149S, as well as the double mutations C65S-K156N and H67D-G140A were evaluated for their effects on enzymatic activity and inhibitor susceptibility. Each recombinant IN was attenuated for 3'-end processing and strand transfer activities. Most proteins were also attenuated for disintegration; the IN that contained K156R and C65S-K156N, however, displayed disintegration activity similar to that of IN from HIV(NL4-3). All mutant IN proteins demonstrated decreased susceptibility to l-CA, while all mutant proteins except E92K and K156R demonstrated resistance to L-731,988. These data validate the computer modeling data and demonstrate that l-CA and L-731,988 share an overlapping inhibitor-binding pocket that involves amino acids Q148, C65, and H67. The resistance studies confirm that L-731,988 fills one-half of the inhibitor-binding pocket and binds to Q148 but excludes E92, while l-CA fills the entire binding groove and thus interacts with E92. These results provide "wet laboratory" evidence that molecular models of the HIV IN inhibitor-binding pocket can be used for drug discovery.     

Insights into the molecular mechanism underlying CD4-dependency and neutralization sensitivity of HIV-1: a comparative molecular dynamics study on gp120s from isolates with different phenotypes

The envelope (Env) of HIV-1 plays critical roles in viral infection and immune evasion. Although structures of prefusion Env have been determined and phenotypes relevant to the CD4 dependency and the neutralization sensitivity for various HIV-1 isolates have been identified, the detailed structural dynamics and energetics underlying these two phenotypes have remained elusive. In this study, two unliganded structural models of gp120, one from the CD4-dependent, neutralization-resistant isolate H061.14 and the other from the CD4-independent, neutralization-sensitive R2 strain, were constructed, and subsequently were subjected to multiple-replica molecular dynamics (MD) simulations followed by free energy landscape (FEL) construction. Comparative analyses of MD trajectories reveal that during simulations R2-gp120 demonstrated larger structural fluctuations/deviations and higher global conformational flexibility than H061.14-gp120. Close comparison of local conformational flexibility shows that some of the structural regions involving direct interactions with gp41 and adjacent gp120 subunits in the context of the closed trimeric Env exhibit significantly higher flexibility in R2-gp120 than in H061.14-gp120, thus likely increasing the probability for R2-Env to open the trimer crown and prime gp41 fusogenic properties without induction by CD4. Collective motions derived from principal component analysis (PCA) reveal that R2-gp120 is prone to spontaneous transition to the neutralization-sensitive CD4-bound state while H061.14-gp120 tends to maintain the neutralization-resistant unliganded state. Finally, comparison between FELs reveals that R2-gp120 has larger conformational entropy, richer conformational diversity, and lower thermostability than H061.14-gp120, thus explaining why R2-gp120 is more structurally unstable and conformationally flexible, and has a higher propensity to transition to the CD4-bound state than H061.14-gp120. The present results reveal that the differences in dynamics and energetics between R2-gp120 and H061.14-gp120 impart Env trimers with distinct capacities to sample different states (i.e., R2-Env samples more readily the open state while H061.14-Env is more inclined to maintain the closed state), thus shedding light on the molecular mechanism underlying the HIV-1 phenotype associated with CD4 dependency/neutralization sensitivity.

The envelope (Env) of HIV-1 plays critical roles in viral infection and immune evasion.     

Inhibition of histamine-mediated signaling confers significant protection against severe malaria in mouse models of disease

From the inoculation of Plasmodium sporozoites via Anopheles mosquito bites to the development of blood-stage parasites, a hallmark of the host response is an inflammatory reaction characterized by elevated histamine levels in the serum and tissues. Given the proinflammatory and immunosuppressive activities associated with histamine, we postulated that this vasoactive amine participates in malaria pathogenesis. Combined genetic and pharmacologic approaches demonstrated that histamine binding to H1R and H2R but not H3R and H4R increases the susceptibility of mice to infection with Plasmodium. To further understand the role of histamine in malaria pathogenesis, we used histidine decarboxylase-deficient (HDC(-/-)) mice, which are free of histamine. HDC(-/-) mice were highly resistant to severe malaria whether infected by mosquito bites or via injection of infected erythrocytes. HDC(-/-) mice displayed resistance to two lethal strains: Plasmodium berghei (Pb) ANKA, which triggers cerebral malaria (CM), and Pb NK65, which causes death without neurological symptoms. The resistance of HDC(-/-) mice to CM was associated with preserved blood-brain barrier integrity, the absence of infected erythrocyte aggregation in the brain vessels, and a lack of sequestration of CD4 and CD8 T cells. We demonstrate that histamine-mediated signaling contributes to malaria pathogenesis. Understanding the basis for these biological effects of histamine during infection may lead to novel therapeutic strategies to alleviate the severity of malaria.     

Block of human heart hH1 sodium channels by amitriptyline

Amitriptyline is a tricyclic antidepressant used to treat major depression and various neuropathic pain syndromes. This drug also causes cardiac toxicity in patients with overdose. We characterized the tonic and use-dependent amitriptyline block of human cardiac (hH1) Na(+) channels expressed in human embryonic kidney cells under voltage-clamp conditions. Our results show that, near the therapeutic plasma concentration of 1 microM, amitriptyline is an effective use-dependent blocker of hH1 Na(+) channels during repetitive pulses (approximately 55% block at 5 Hz). The tonic block for resting and for inactivated hH1 channels by amitriptyline (0.1-100 microM) yielded IC(50) values (50% inhibitory concentration) of 24.8 +/- 2.0 (n = 9) and 0.58 +/- 0.03 microM (n = 7), respectively. Substitution of phenylalanine with lysine at the hH1-F1760 position, a putative binding site for local anesthetics, eliminates the use-dependent block by amitriptyline at 1 microM. The time constants of recovery from the inactivated-state amitriptyline block in hH1 wild-type and hH1-F1760K mutant channels are 8.0 +/- 0. 5 (n = 6) and 0.45 +/- 0.07 s (n = 6), respectively. A substitution at either hH1-F1760K or hH1-Y1767K significantly increases the IC(50) values for resting and inactivated states of amitriptyline, but the increase is much more pronounced with the hH1-F1760K mutation. Because these two residues were proposed to form a part of the local anesthetic binding site, we conclude that amitriptyline and local anesthetics interact with a common binding site. Furthermore, at therapeutic concentrations, the ability of amitriptyline to act as a potent use-dependent blocker of Na(+) channels may, in part, explain its analgesic actions.