Correlation between factor VIII genotype and inhibitor development in hemophilia A

The development of neutralizing antibodies, or inhibitors, against infused factor VIII represents a significant complication of treatment for hemophilia A. Although it is likely that both genetic and environmental factors influence whether patients form inhibitors, correlations between types of factor VIII mutations and inhibitor development are becoming apparent. Approximately 20% of all patients with severe hemophilia A generate inhibitors. Of these inhibitor patients, 90% have inversions, large deletions or nonsense mutations of the factor VIII gene that would be predicted to eliminate production of factor VIII antigen. In contrast to patients with severe disease, inhibitor formation in patients with mild/moderate hemophilia A is rare. Inhibitor patients with mild/moderate disease typically have missense mutations that may cause local conformational changes within immunogenic domains of factor VIII and lead to production of dysfunctional antigen. Taken together, hemophilia A patients are predisposed to inhibitor development with mutations causing infused factor VIII to be perceived as either 1) a completely novel antigen or 2) an immunologically altered antigen.     

Antibodies to factor VIII in hemophilia A patients

Inhibitor development represents the main complication in the treatment of haemophilia A. The risk of inhibitor formation is in part genetically determined by the type of the underlying factor VIII gene lesion but environmental factors may also play an important role. Due to the lack of efficiency of factor VIII in these patients other therapeutic agents must be used for the treatment of bleedings, however, none is as effective as factor VIII in a non-inhibitor patient. Therefore, the eridication of the inhibitor through immune tolerance therapy is the treatment of choice. Centralized national and international immune tolerance registries have collected the results and show cost effectiveness of this treatment.     

Properties of anti-factor VIII inhibitor antibodies in hemophilia A patients

Blood coagulation factor VIII functions in the intrinsic pathway of blood coagulation as a cofactor by enhancing the assembly of its complex with factors IX and X on the surface of activated platelets. This requires factor VIII interaction with these two proteins, von Willebrand factor (vWF), and phospholipids on the platelet surface. Once factor VIII and factor IX are activated by proteolytic cleavage, the complex is able to activate factor X to factor Xa by proteolysis. In hemophilia A patients with severe factor VIII deficiency, about 30% respond to factor VIII infusion therapy immunologically to produce antibodies that inactivate the infused factor VIII and others that are noninhibitory. An assay that measures only the inhibitor antibodies demonstrated that the factor VIII A2, A3, and C2 domains are the most immunogenic, and domains A1 and B are poorly immunogenic or not immunogenic. The specific antibody responses to A2, A3, and C2 vary considerably among individuals, and epitopes for inhibitor antibodies have been determined for all three. The anti-C2 inhibitors prevent factor VIII binding to phospholipids and vWF, and anti-A3 inhibitors prevent binding to factor IX (IXa). An inhibitor binding site for factor X has been localized to the A1 domain acidic region, leading to inhibition of factor VIII/factor X binding by antibodies. This inhibitor mechanism is rare. Because a second binding site for factor IX was localized to the factor VIII A2 domain, it is likely but not proven that prevention of factor IX binding to factor VIII is the inhibitor mechanism for this epitope.     

A multicenter study of recombinant factor VIII (recombinate): safety, efficacy, and inhibitor risk in previously untreated patients with hemophilia A. The Recombinate Study Group

In July 1990, the Recombinate Study Group initiated a prospective, open- labeled investigation of recombinant factor VIII (r-FVIII) to assess its safety and efficacy and to characterize the natural history of inhibitor development in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with hemophilia A. All study subjects have severe FVIII deficiency (baseline FVIII level < or = 2% of normal) and no history of blood product exposure before study entry. Following the first r-FVIII infusion, plasma was screened for inhibitors once every 3 months, and plasma recovery of r-FVIII at 30 minutes and 24 hours postinfusion was assayed at least once every 6 months. As of May 1993, 73 of 79 patients originally enrolled in the trial continue to participate. The median number of r-FVIII exposure-days for the 71 subjects who have received at least one r-FVIII infusion is 11. A total of 1,785 infusions have been administered to treat 810 bleeding events. Ninety-two percent of bleeding events responded as anticipated to one or two infusions. Two, nonrecurring, acute adverse reactions occurred coincident with r-FVIII infusion, one of which was unrelated and the other, possibly related to the infusion. Seventeen (23.9%) subjects have developed inhibitors: five with peak titers more than 10 Bethesda units (BU) and 12 with peak titers < or = 10 BU (range, 0.5 to 10). Survival analysis showed that the probability of remaining inhibitor-free in this group of patients with severe hemophilia A is 88.4% after 8, 73.6% after 10, and 61.6% after 25 r-FVIII exposure-days. Inhibitors disappeared in five (29.4%) subjects on retesting 2 to 16 months after the last positive inhibitor assay. r-FVIII is safe and effective in the treatment of hemophilia A- related bleeding. To date, the inhibitor risk associated with its use is comparable to that in patients treated with plasma-derived concentrates. The majority of inhibitors identified are low in titer and do not preclude continued on-demand therapy with r-FVIII.     

Assaying the circulating factor VIII activity in hemophilia A patients treated with recombinant factor VIII products

Large discrepancies between factor VIII assay methods have been reported from pharmacokinetic studies of recombinant factor VIII concentrates. In the assay of postinfusion patient plasma samples, traditional activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-based one-stage clotting methods usually give results that are 20 to 50% lower than those obtained by chromogenic substrate assays. Investigations into the cause of these discrepancies have shown that the choice of phospholipid in the one-stage assay is crucial. The use of platelets or liposomes resembling platelet factor 3 instead of traditional aPTT reagents results in an increase in the apparent one-stage activity and a fairly good correlation with the chromogenic results. These and other functional test results, antigen measurements as well as clinical data, support the view that the chromogenic assay most accurately reflects the therapeutic effect. In addition to the differences among assay methods, there is also a discrepancy between the World Health Organization (WHO) standards for concentrates and plasma. The use of product-specific standards, prepared by diluting the factor VIII concentrate into hemophilic plasma, when assaying postinfusion plasma samples seems to be a feasible approach to overcome the problems encountered in pharmacokinetic studies.     

How we treat a hemophilia A patient with a factor VIII inhibitor

The most significant complication of treatment in patients with hemophilia A is the development of alloantibodies that inhibit factor VIII activity. In the presence of inhibitory antibodies, replacement of the missing clotting factor by infusion of factor VIII becomes less effective. Once replacement therapy is ineffective, acute management of bleeding requires agents that bypass factor VIII activity. Long-term management consists of eradicating the inhibitor through immune tolerance. Despite success in the treatment of acute bleeding and inhibitor eradication, there remains an inability to predict or prevent inhibitor formation. Ideally, prediction and ultimately prevention will come with an improved understanding of how patient-specific and treatment-related factors work together to influence anti-factor VIII antibody production.     

Noncoagulation inhibitory factor VIII antibodies after induction of tolerance to factor VIII in hemophilia A patients

We recently described tolerance induction with factor VIII/IX, cyclophosphamide, and high-dose intravenous IgG in hemophilia A or B patients with coagulation inhibitory antibodies. Circulating noninhibitory antibodies complexed with factor IX have been demonstrated in tolerant hemophilia B patients. Similar findings are now described in six tolerant hemophilia A patients. Complexes between factor VIII and the 'tolerant' antibody were demonstrated by subjecting plasma to gel filtration chromatography, void fractions containing factor VIII/vWF complexes being collected and adsorbed to protein A. Using 125I-labeled F(ab')2 fragments against IgG subclass and factor VIII antigen, complexes between an IgG4 antibody and factor VIII were found to adsorb to protein A. After infusion of factor VIII to tolerant patients, all factor VIII circulated in complex with IgG4 antibody. In three of the patients, the 'tolerant' antibodies inhibited an ELISA specific for factor VIII light chain but, unlike the pretolerant antibodies, did not bind radiolabeled factor VIII heavy chain. Although after induction of tolerance the patients still have circulating IgG4 antibodies against factor VIII, the antibodies differ in specificity, lack coagulation inhibitory activity, and do not enhance the rate of elimination of factor VIII.     

Clotting factor concentrate switching and inhibitor development in hemophilia A

The development of alloantibodies or inhibitors is the most serious complication a patient with severe hemophilia can experience from treatment with clotting factor concentrates. Although common in previously untreated patients, inhibitor development is rare in multiply exposed, well-tolerized patients. There has been a nonevidence-based reluctance to change concentrate because of a perceived greater inhibitor risk after the switch, even though most patients are now likely to be using a concentrate on which they did not begin. Inhibitors in previously treated patients are observed in approximately 2 per 1000 patient/years, which makes it difficult to study and compare rates among different products. Because the baseline inhibitor risk in previously treated patients may vary over time, it is important to compare the risk in patients switching to a new product with that in a parallel control group of nonswitching patients or within a case-controlled study. The study designs imposed by regulators are suboptimal in detecting immunogenicity signals. The issue of immunogenicity of new products is likely to gain more relevance in the near future, with a call for effective postmarketing surveillance studies for all of the new engineered factor VIII concentrates with prolonged half-lives that are likely to enter clinical practice.     

The use of recombinant factor VIII products in previously treated patients with hemophilia A: pharmacokinetics,efficacy, safety,and inhibitor development

Studies in previously treated patients (PTPs) have been conducted for the three recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) concentrates currently licensed. Kogenate, has shown a recovery of 2.7% per IU/kg and a half-life of 15.8 hours. A prospective 5-year study in 58 patients showed that 82% of bleeds resolved with one treatment; the average dose was 25 IU/kg. For Recombinate, the recovery was 2.4% per IU/kg and the half-life was 14.7 hours. In 69 patients, the average dose used to treat a bleed was 27.5 IU/kg, and 91% of responses were categorized as good or excellent. B-domain depleted rFVIII, Refacto, has shown a recovery of 2.7% per IU/kg and a half-life of 14 hours. In 113 PTPs, the average dose used was 29.5 IU/kg, and 71% of bleeds responded to one treatment. All three recombinant products have been shown to be safe and effective in very similar dosing regimens. In view of the good recoveries, it is probable that smaller doses, such as 20 IU/kg, could be recommended to treat a bleed effectively with one dose, given that dosing regimens were previously established using intermediate products. Clearly, this would have considerable financial advantages.     

Antibodies to factor VIII. V. Patterns of immune response to factor VIII in hemophilia A.

The natural history of factor VIII antibodies was studied in 20 severe, multitransfused hemophiliacs. Two patterns of humoral immune reactivity were observed. In one group of ten, who developed antibodies after an average of 22 cumulative exposure days to factor VIII, the antibody titers increased after each antigenic stimulation or persisted for years in the absence of transfusion. These patients were designated as high-responding hemophiliacs. In the second group of ten patients, the factor VIII neutralizing activity appeared after a longer exposure period (48 days). Antibody titers remained low, and there was no significant difference in individual titers before and 8--20 days following transfusion. Antibody affinity did not increase after renewed antigenic challenge. This pattern characterized low-responding hemophiliacs. The latter group of patients benefited from repeated placement therapy required by the clinical situation.     

Mutation analysis of factor VIII in Korean patients with severe hemophilia A

Hemophilia A is an X-linked recessive disorder caused by mutations of the factor VIII gene. The mutation spectrum has been reported in various populations, but not in Koreans. Mutation analysis of the factor VIII gene was performed in 22 unrelated Korean patients with severe hemophilia A. We extracted genomic DNA from their blood, and assessed intron inversions, deletions, and point mutations by direct DNA sequencing. A multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification gene dosage assay was also performed to identify exon deletions. Disease-causing mutations were identified in all patients, of which four cases were previously unreported. Seven intron 22 inversions, nine point mutations (6 nonsense mutations and 3 missense mutations), and four small rearrangements were identified. One multi-exon deletion and one 5′-donor splicing site mutation were also observed. Four novel mutations (one small deletion, one multiple exon deletion, one missense, and one splice site mutation) were detected, and point mutations were predominant (40.9%), followed by intron 22 inversions (31.8%). Further studies are required in order to establish a solid conclusion regarding the prevalence of various mutations in the Korean population.     

Antifactor VIII antibody inhibiting allogeneic but not autologous factor VIII in patients with mild hemophilia A

Two unrelated patients with the same Arg2150His mutation in the factor VIII (FVIII) C1 domain, a residual FVIII activity of 0.09 IU/mL, and inhibitor titres of 300 and 6 Bethesda Units, respectively, were studied. Further analysis of patient LE, with the highest inhibitor titer, showed that (1) plasma or polyclonal IgG antibodies prepared from LE plasma inhibited the activity of allogeneic (wild-type) but not of self FVIII; (2) the presence of von Willebrand factor (vWF) increased by over 10-fold the inhibitory activity on wild-type FVIII; (3) the kinetics of FVIII inhibition followed a type II pattern, but in contrast to previously described type II inhibitors, LE IgG was potentiated by the presence of vWF instead of being in competition with it; (4) polyclonal LE IgG recognized the FVIII light chain in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the recombinant A3-C1 domains in an immunoprecipitation assay, indicating that at least part of LE antibodies reacted with the FVIII domain encompassing the mutation site; and (5) LE IgG inhibited FVIII activity by decreasing the rate of FVIIIa release from vWF, but LE IgG recognized an epitope distinct from ESH8, a murine monoclonal antibody exhibiting the same property. We conclude that the present inhibitors are unique in that they clearly distinguish wild-type from self, mutated FVIII. The inhibition of wild-type FVIII by LE antibody is enhanced by vWF and is associated with an antibody-dependent reduced rate of FVIIIa release from vWF.     

Mutations of factor VIII cleavage sites in hemophilia A

Hemophilia A is caused by a defect in coagulation factor VIII, a protein that undergoes extensive proteolysis during its activation and inactivation. To determine whether some cases of hemophilia are caused by mutations in important cleavage sites, we screened patient DNA samples for mutations in these sites by a two-step process. Regions of interest were amplified from genomic DNA by repeated rounds of primer- directed DNA synthesis. The amplified DNAs were then screened for mutations by discriminant hybridization using oligonucleotide probes. Two cleavage site mutations were found in a survey of 215 patients. A nonsense mutation in the activated protein C cleavage site at amino acid 336 was discovered in a patient with severe hemophilia. In another severely affected patient, a mis-sense mutation results in a substitution of cysteine for arginine in the thrombin activation site at amino acid 1689. This defect is associated with no detectable factor VIII activity, but with normal levels of factor VIII antigen. The severe hemophilia in this patient was sporadic; analysis of the mother suggested that the mutation originated in her gametes or during her embryogenesis. The results demonstrate that this approach can be used to identify factor VIII gene mutations in regions of the molecule known to be important for function.     

High-dose factor VIII inhibits factor VIII-specific memory B cells in hemophilia A with factor VIII inhibitors

Hemophilia A in its severe form is a life-threatening hemorrhagic disease that is caused by mutations in the factor VIII (FVIII) gene (symbol F8). About 25% of patients who receive replacement therapy develop neutralizing antibodies that inhibit the function of substituted FVIII. Long-term application of high doses of FVIII has evolved as an effective therapy to eradicate the antibodies and to induce long-lasting immune tolerance. Little is known, however, about the immunologic mechanisms that cause the down-modulation of anti-FVIII antibodies by high doses of FVIII. We report that high doses of FVIII inhibit the restimulation of FVIII-specific memory B cells and their differentiation into antibody-secreting plasma cells in vitro and in vivo in a murine model of hemophilia A. The inhibition of memory B-cell responses is irreversible and not mediated by FVIII-specific T cells. Furthermore, it seems to involve the activation of caspases. We conclude that the inhibition of FVIII-specific memory B cells might be an early event in the down-modulation of anti-FVIII antibodies in patients with hemophilia A who receive high doses of FVIII.     

Transient factor VIII inhibitor in a hemophilia patient after staphylococcal septic shock syndrome

We report a transient type I factor VIII inhibitor that arose in a 30-year-old hemophilia patient just after staphylococcal septicemia. This situation usually occurs early in the course of substitution therapy with factor VIII concentrate in hemophilia patients. Although disseminated intravascular coagulation and acute respiratory distress syndrome developed after septic shock, the patient recovered following intravenous administration of antibiotics (meropenem and gentamycin), an antithrombin preparation, high-dose methylprednisolone, and recombinant factor VIII concentrate (rFVIII). During this therapy, however, activated partial thromboplastin time gradually lengthened. On the seventh day of hospitalization, intracranial hemorrhage occurred with right hemiplegia, even though the substitution therapy had continued at the same dosage (30 U/kg per day) of rFVIII. At that point, 4 Bethesda units of the type I inhibitor against factor VIII were detected in the plasma. Increased amounts (46 U/kg per day) of rFVIII and prednisolone were administered, and hypothermic therapy was initiated. Following these treatments, the patient's general condition gradually improved, and within 25 days the inhibitor titer dropped to undetectable levels and did not recur during treatment. These clinical findings suggest that the staphylococcal septic shock may have acted as a trigger in the development of transient factor VIII inhibitor in this patient.