Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound velocity criteria for the diagnosis of in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) are not well established. In the present study, we test whether ultrasound velocity measurements correlate with increasing degrees of in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing CAS and develop customized velocity criteria to identify residual stenosis > or =20%, in-stent restenosis > or =50%, and high-grade in-stent restenosis > or =80%. METHODS: Carotid angiograms performed at the completion of CAS were compared with duplex ultrasound (DUS) imaging performed immediately after the procedure. Patients were followed up with annual DUS imaging and underwent both ultrasound scans and computed tomography angiography (CTA) at their most recent follow-up visit. Patients with suspected high-grade in-stent restenosis on DUS imaging underwent diagnostic carotid angiograms. DUS findings were therefore available for comparison with luminal stenosis measured by carotid angiograms or CTA in all these patients. The DUS protocol included peak-systolic (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) measurements in the native common carotid artery (CCA), proximal stent, mid stent, distal stent, and distal internal carotid artery (ICA). RESULTS: Of 255 CAS procedures that were reviewed, 39 had contralateral ICA stenosis and were excluded from the study. During a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 1 to 10 years), 23 patients died and 64 were lost. Available for analysis were 189 pairs of ultrasound and procedural carotid angiogram measurements; 99 pairs of ultrasound and CTA measurements during routine follow-up; and 29 pairs of ultrasound and carotid angiograms measurements during follow-up for suspected high-grade in-stent restenosis > or =80% (n = 310 pairs of observations, ultrasound vs carotid angiograms/CTA). The accuracy of CTA vs carotid angiograms was confirmed (r(2) = 0.88) in a subset of 19 patients. Post-CAS PSV (r(2) = .85) and ICA/CCA ratios (r(2) = 0.76) correlated most with the degree of stenosis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated the following optimal threshold criteria: residual stenosis > or =20% (PSV >or =150 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio > or =2.15), in-stent restenosis > or =50% (PSV > or =220 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio > or =2.7), and in-stent restenosis > or =80% (PSV 340 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio > or =4.15). CONCLUSIONS: Progressively increasing PSV and ICA/CCA ratios correlate with evolving restenosis within the stented carotid artery. Ultrasound velocity criteria developed for native arteries overestimate the degree of in-stent restenosis encountered. These changes persist during long-term follow-up and across all grades of in-stent restenosis after CAS. The proposed new velocity criteria accurately define residual stenosis >or =20%, in-stent restenosis >or =50%, and high-grade in-stent restenosis > or =80% in the stented carotid artery.     

Carotid duplex velocity criteria revisited for the diagnosis of carotid in-stent restenosis

Carotid percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting has become an accepted treatment modality for carotid artery stenosis in high-risk patients. There has been an ongoing debate regarding which duplex ultrasound (DUS) criteria to use to determine the rate of in-stent restenosis. This prospective study revisits DUS criteria for determining the rate of in-stent restenosis. In analyzing a subset of 12 patients (pilot study) who had both completion carotid angiography and DUS within 30 days, 10 patients with normal post-stenting carotid angiography (< 30% residual stenosis) had peak systolic velocities (PSVs) of the stented internal carotid artery (ICA) of < or = 155 cm/s and two patients with > or = 30% residual stenosis had internal carotid artery (ICA) PSVs of > 155 cm/s. Eighty-three patients who underwent carotid stenting as part of clinical trials were analyzed. All patients underwent post-stenting carotid DUS that was done at 1 month and every 6 months thereafter. PSVs and end-diastolic velocities of the ICA and common carotid artery were recorded. Patients with PSVs of the ICA of > 140 cm/s underwent carotid computed tomographic (CT) angiography. The perioperative stroke rate was 1.2%. When the old DUS velocity criteria for nonstented carotid arteries were applied, 54% of patients had > or = 30% restenosis (PSV of > 120 cm/s), but when our new proposed DUS velocity criteria for stented arteries were applied (PSV of > 155 cm/s), 33% had > or = 30% restenosis at a mean follow-up of 18 months (p = .007). The mean PSVs for patients with normal stented carotid arteries based on CT angiography, were 122 cm/s versus 243 cm/s for > or = 30% restenosis and 113 cm/s versus 230 cm/s for > or = 30% restenosis based on our new criteria. The mean PSVs of in-stent restenosis of 30 to < 50%, 50 to < 70%, and 70 to 99%, based on CT angiography, were 205 cm/s, 264 cm/s, and 435 cm/s, respectively. Receiver operating curve analysis demonstrated that an ICA PSV of > 155 cm/s was optimal for detecting > or = 30% in-stent restenosis, with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 90%, a positive predictive value of 74%, and a negative predictive value of 100%. The currently used carotid DUS velocity criteria overestimated the incidence of in-stent restenosis. We propose new velocity criteria for the ICA PSV of > 155 cm/s to define > or = 30% in-stent restenosis.     

Duplex scan surveillance after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a rational definition of stent stenosis

OBJECTIVE: A duplex ultrasound (DUS) surveillance algorithm used after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was applied to patients after carotid stenting and angioplasty (CAS) to determine the incidence of high-grade stent stenosis, its relationship to clinical symptoms, and the outcome of reintervention. METHODS: In 111 patients who underwent 114 CAS procedures for symptomatic (n = 62) or asymptomatic (n = 52) atherosclerotic or recurrent stenosis after CEA involving the internal carotid artery (ICA), DUS surveillance was performed 300 cm/s, diastolic velocity >125 cm/s, internal carotid artery stent/proximal common carotid artery ratio >4) involving the stented arterial segment prompted diagnostic angiography and repair when >75% diameter-reduction stenosis was confirmed. Criteria for >50% CAS stenosis was a PSV >150 cm/s with a PSV stent ratio >2. RESULTS: All 114 carotid stents were patent on initial DUS imaging, including 90 (79%) with PSV <150 cm/s (94 +/- 24 cm/s), 23 (20%) with PSV >150 cm/s (183 +/- 34 cm/s), and one with high-grade, residual stenosis (PSV = 355). During subsequent surveillance, 81 CAS sites (71%) exhibited no change in stenosis severity, nine sites demonstrated stenosis regression to <50% diameter reduction, and five sites developed velocity spectra of a high-grade stenosis. Angiography confirmed >75% diameter reduction in all six CASs with DUS-detected high-grade stenosis, all patients were asymptomatic, and treatment consisted of endovascular (n = 5) or surgical (n = 1) repair. During the mean 33-month follow-up period, three patients experienced ipsilateral, reversible neurologic events at 30, 45, and 120 days after CAS; none was associated with severe stent stenosis. No stent occlusions occurred, and no patient with >50% CAS stenosis on initial or subsequent testing developed a permanent ipsilateral permanent neurologic deficit or stroke-related death. CONCLUSION: DUS surveillance after CAS identified a 5% procedural failure rate due to the development of high-grade in-stent stenosis. Both progression and regression of stent stenosis severity was observed on serial testing, but 70% of CAS sites demonstrated velocity spectra consistent with <50% diameter reduction. The surveillance algorithm used, including reintervention for asymptomatic high-grade CAS stenosis, was associated with stent patency and the absence of disabling stroke.     

Ultrasound criteria for severe in-stent restenosis following carotid artery stenting

PURPOSE: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a known complication following carotid artery stenting (CAS). However, ultrasound criteria determining ISR are not well established. We evaluated alternative ultrasound velocity criteria for >70% ISR in our institution. METHODS: Clinical records of 256 patients undergoing 282 consecutive CAS procedures over a 42-month period were reviewed. Follow-up ultrasounds were available for analysis in 237 patients. Selective angiograms and repeat interventions were performed for >70% ISR. Ultrasound criteria including peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), and internal carotid to common carotid artery ratios (ICA/CCA) were examined. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for PSV (200, 250, 300, 350, and 400 cm/s), EDV (70, 80, 90, 100 cm/s), and CCA/ICA (3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5). RESULTS: Twenty-two carotid angiograms were performed and 18 lesions had confirmations of >70% ISR in 11 patients including prior CEA in five patients and neck irradiation in two patients. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) was analyzed for PSV, EDV, and CCA/ICA ratio. For 70% or greater angiographic ISR, PSV > 300 cm/s correlated to a 94% sensitivity, 50% specificity, 90% positive predictive value (PPV), and 67% negative predictive value (NPV); EDV > 90 cm/s correlated to an 89% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% PPV, and 67% NPV; and ICA/CCA > 4 had a 94.4% sensitivity, 75% specificity, 94% PPV, and 75% NPV. A significant color flow disturbance was detected in one patient who did not meet the aforementioned ultrasound velocity criteria. Further statistical analysis showed that an EDV of 90 cm/s provided the best discriminant value. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that PSV > 300 cm/s, EDV > 90 cm/s, and ICA/CCA > 4 correlated well with >70% ISR. Although still rudimentary, these velocity criteria combined with color flow patterns can reliably predict severe ISR in our vascular laboratory. However, due to the relatively infrequent cases of severe ISR following CAS, a multicentered study is warranted to establish standard post-CAS ultrasound surveillance criteria for severe ISR.     

Carotid artery stenting: is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria?

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound (US) velocity criteria have not been well-established for patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). A potential source of error in using US after CAS is that reduced compliance in the stented artery may result in elevated velocity relative to the native artery. We measured arterial compliance in the stented artery, and developed customized velocity criteria for use early after CAS. METHODS: US was performed before and within 3 days after CAS, and after 1 month in a subset of 26 patients. Post-procedural peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) of the internal carotid artery (ICA), PSV/EDV ratio, and internal carotid artery to common carotid artery ratio (ICA/CCA) were recorded. These were compared with degree of in-stent residual stenosis determined at carotid angiography performed at the completion of CAS. Peterson's elastic modulus (Ep) and compliance (Cp) of the ICA were determined in a subgroup of 20 patients at the distal end of the stent and in the same region in the native ICA before stenting. RESULTS: Ninety CAS procedures were analyzed. Mean (+/-SD) angiographic residual stenosis after CAS was 5.4 +/- 9.1%, whereas corresponding PSV by US was 120.4 +/- 32.4 cm/s; EDV, 41.4 +/- 18.6 cm/s; PSV/EDV ratio, 3.3 +/- 1.2; and ICA/CCA ratio, 1.6 +/- 0.5. PSV was unchanged at 1 month. Post-CAS PSV and ICA/CCA ratio correlated most with degree of stenosis (P <.0001 for both). Only six patients demonstrated in-stent residual stenosis 20% or greater, but the standard US threshold of PSV 130 cm/s or greater (validated for >20% ICA stenosis in our laboratory) categorized 38 of 90 patients as having stenosis 20% or greater. Receiver operator curve analysis demonstrated that a combined threshold of PSV 150 cm/s or greater and ICA/CCA ratio 2.16 or greater were optimal for detecting residual stenosis of 20% or greater, with sensitivity 100%, specificity 98%, positive predictive value 75%, and negative predictive value 100%. After placement of a stent, the ICA demonstrated significantly increased Ep (1.2 vs 4.4 x 10(3) mm Hg; P =.004) and decreased Cp (9.8 vs 3.2 %mm Hg x 10(-2); P =.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Currently accepted US velocity criteria validated in our laboratory for nonstented ICAs falsely classified several stented ICAs with normal diameter on carotid angiograms as having residual in-stent stenosis 20% or greater. We propose a new criterion that defines PSV less than 150 cm/s, with ICA/CCA ratio less than 2.16, as the best correlate to a normal lumen (0%-19% stenosis) in the recently stented ICA. This was associated with increased stiffness of the stented ICA (increased Ep, decreased Cp). These preliminary results suggest that placement of a stent in the carotid artery alters its biomechanical properties, which may cause an increase in US velocity measurements in the absence of a technical error or residual stenotic disease.     

Reappraisal of velocity criteria for carotid bulb/internal carotid artery stenosis utilizing high-resolution B-mode ultrasound validated with computed tomography angiography

OBJECTIVE: Reliability of the most commonly used duplex ultrasound (DUS) velocity thresholds for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis has been questioned since these thresholds were developed using less precise methods to grade stenosis severity based on angiography. In this study, maximum percent diameter carotid bulb ICA stenosis (European Carotid Surgery Trial [ECST] method) was objectively measured using high resolution B-mode DUS validated with computed tomography angiography (CTA) and used to determine optimum velocity thresholds for > or =50% and > or =80% bulb internal carotid artery stenosis (ICA). METHODS: B-mode DUS and CTA images of 74 bulb ICA stenoses were compared to validate accuracy of the DUS measurements. In 337 mild, moderate, and severe bulb ICA stenoses (n = 232 patients), the minimal residual lumen and the maximum outer bulb/proximal ICA diameter were determined on longitudinal and transverse images. This in contrast to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) method using normal distal ICA lumen diameter as the denominator. Severe calcified carotid segments and patients with contralateral occlusion were excluded. In each study, the highest peak systolic (PSV) and end-diastolic (EDV) velocities as well as ICA/common carotid artery (CCA) ratio were recorded. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the optimum threshold for each hemodynamic parameter was determined to predict > or =50% (n = 281) and > or =80% (n = 62) bulb ICA stenosis. RESULTS: Patients mean age was 74 +/- 8 years; 49% females. Clinical risk factors for atherosclerosis included coronary artery disease (40%), diabetes mellitus (32%), hypertension (70%), smoking (34%), and hypercholesterolemia (49%). Thirty-three percent of carotid lesions (n = 110) presented with ischemic cerebrovascular symptoms and 67% (n = 227) were asymptomatic. There was an excellent agreement between B-mode DUS and CTA (r = 0.9, P = .002). The inter/intraobserver agreement (kappa) for B-mode imaging measurements were 0.8 and 0.9, respectively, and for CTA measurements 0.8 and 0.9, respectively. When both PSV of > or =155 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio of > or =2 were combined for the detection of > or =50% bulb ICA stenosis, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 97% and an accuracy of 82% were obtained. For a > or =80% bulb ICA stenosis, an EDV of > or =140 cm/s, a PSV of > or =370 cm/s and an ICA/CCA ratio of > or =6 had acceptable probability values. CONCLUSION: Compared with established velocity thresholds commonly applied in practice, a substantially higher PSV (155 vs 125 cm/s) was more accurate for detecting > or =50% bulb/ICA stenosis. In combination, a PSV of > or =155 cm/s and an ICA/CCA ratio of > or =2 have excellent predictive value for this stenosis category. For > or =80% bulb ICA stenosis (NASCET 60% stenosis), an EDV of 140 cm/s, a PSV of > or =370 cm/s, and an ICA/CCA ratio of > or =6 are equally reliable and do not indicate any major change from the established criteria. Current DUS > or =50% bulb ICA stenosis criteria appear to overestimate carotid bifurcation disease and may predispose patients with asymptomatic carotid disease to untoward costly diagnostic imaging and intervention.     

Duplex criteria for determining ≥50% and ≥80% internal carotid artery stenosis following carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty

The purpose of this study was to determine optimal velocities for detecting ≥50% and ≥80% restenosis prior to considering carotid intervention/carotid artery stenting (CAS) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with patching in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Two hundred CEA patients with 195 pairs of imaging (duplex ultrasound versus computed tomography angiography [CTA]/carotid arteriography) were analyzed. Peak systolic velocities (PSVs), end diastolic velocity (EDV) and internal carotid artery/common carotid artery (ICA/CCA) ratios were correlated to angiography. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves determined optimal velocity criteria in detecting ≥50% and ≥80% restenosis. The mean PSVs for ≥50% and ≥80% restenosis were 248 and 404 c/s, respectively (P < 0.001). A PSV of ≥213 c/s was optimal for ≥50% restenosis with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy (OA) of 99%, 100%, 100%, 98% and 99%, respectively. An ICA PSV of 274 c/s was optimal for ≥80% restenosis with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and OA of 100%, 91%, 99%, 100% and 99%, respectively. ROC analysis showed that PSVs were significantly better than EDVs and ICA/CCA ratios in detecting ≥50% restenosis. Standard duplex velocity criteria should be revised after CEA using patching. Specific carotid duplex velocities can be used to detect ≥50% and ≥80% restenosis after CEA with patch closure prior to carotid intervention/CAS.     

Is a single preoperative duplex scan sufficient for planning bilateral carotid endarterectomy?

PURPOSE: Duplex scanning is often the sole imaging study before carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Patients with bilateral severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis may be considered for bilateral CEA. High-grade ICA stenosis, however, may artifactually elevate velocity measurements used to quantify stenosis in the contralateral ICA. It is unknown whether ipsilateral CEA will influence duplex determination of the presence of a contralateral 60% to 99% ICA stenosis. This study was performed to determine whether a single preoperative duplex scan is sufficient to plan bilateral CEA. METHODS: Preoperative and early postoperative carotid duplex scans in patients with bilateral ICA stenosis who underwent unilateral CEA were reviewed. Changes in duplex scans that determined stenosis in the ICA contralateral to the CEA were analyzed. Previously validated criteria used to determine 60% to 99% ICA stenosis were a peak systolic velocity (PSV) of 260 cm/sec or more combined with an end diastolic velocity (EDV) of 70 cm/sec or more. RESULTS: Over an 8-year period, 460 patients underwent CEA; 107 patients (23.3%) had an asymptomatic 50% to 99% contralateral ICA stenosis by standard criteria (PSV, >125 cm/sec) and an early postoperative duplex scan examination. Of these 107 patients, 38 patients (35.5%) had duplex scan criteria for 60% to 99% contralateral ICA stenosis. In these 38 patients, there was a mean postoperative PSV decrease of 47.7 cm/sec (10.1%) and a mean EDV decrease of 36.0 cm/sec (19.3%) in the ICA contralateral to the CEA. Eight of 38 (21.1%) preoperative contralateral 60% to 99% ICA lesions were reclassified as less than 60% on postoperative duplex scanning. Six of 69 (8.7%) preoperative lesions of less than 60% were reclassified as 60% to 99% on postoperative duplex scan. These six preoperative examinations were all close to the criteria for 60% to 99% stenosis (mean PSV, 232.5 cm/sec; mean EDV, 62.5 cm/sec). CONCLUSION: One-fifth of patients with apparent 60% to 99% contralateral ICA lesions before the operation have less than 60% stenosis when restudied with duplex scan after unilateral CEA. Lesions below but near the cutoff for 60% to 99% may be reclassified as 60% to 99% on the postoperative duplex scan. These findings mandate that when duplex scanning is used as the sole imaging modality before CEA, patients with severe bilateral carotid stenosis must have an additional carotid duplex examination before operation on the second side.     

Upper Extremity Hemodynamic Changes after Radial Artery Harvest for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

t -test. There were no significant changes between preoperative and postoperative pressures in the brachial, radial, and ulnar arteries, and thumb, index, long, ring, or little fingers. Pressure changes in the thumb and index finger approached but did not achieve a statistical difference. Peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), and resistive index (RI) in the distal ulnar artery changed significantly between preoperative and postoperative measurements. PSV changed from 0.50 ± 0.05 m/sec to 0.67 ± 0.04 m/sec (p= 0.02); EDV changed from 0.03 ± 0.03 m/sec to −0.10 ± 0.05 m/sec (p= 0.05); and RI changed from 0.97 ± 0.05 to 1.13 ± 0.05 (p= 0.02). Palmar arch evaluations revealed significant changes at rest and with ulnar compression between preoperative and postoperative measurements: (1) at rest EDV changed from 0.03 ± 0.02 m/sec to −0.05 ± 0.02 m/sec (p < 0.01); (2) at rest RI changed from 0.96 ± 0.05 to 1.12 ± 0.05 (p= 0.01); (3) with ulnar compression the PSV changed from 0.23 ± 0.05 m/sec to 0.005 ± 0.01 m/sec (p < 0.01); and (4) with ulnar compression the RI changed from 0.82 ± 0.11 to 0.27 ± 0.12 (p < 0.01). Eight patients had a variety of complaints at the follow-up visit, the majority being numbness and tingling. No patients reported symptoms of claudication or rest pain at the follow-up visit. The data suggest that while statistically significant changes in velocity and arterial resistance do occur, patients seem to tolerate radial artery harvesting without clinical consequences. The ideal method of preoperative evaluation remains to be determined.     

血流彩色编码成像技术评估颈动脉植入支架前后血流动力学变化

目的探讨彩色血流编码DSA(CC-DSA)评估颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)前后血流动力学变化的可行性。方法回顾性分析接受CAS治疗的颈内动脉起始段重度狭窄患者16例。将CAS前后颈动脉造影图像经CC-DSA后处理得到相应的彩色血流编码图像,分别于颈总动脉、颈内动脉C1段、大脑中动脉M1段及横窦处设置感兴趣点(POI),分别检测达峰时间(TTP)及相对达峰时间(rTTP)。同时收集CAS前后颈动脉狭窄段及颈内动脉C1段远端(管腔正常处)收缩期峰值流速(PSV)及舒张末期流速(EDV)。结果 CAS治疗后颈内动脉C1段及大脑中动脉M1段TTP及rTTP均较术前降低(P均0.05),CAS治疗前后颈总动脉、横窦TTP及横窦rTTP差异均无统计学意义(P均0.05)。CAS治疗后颈动脉狭窄段PSV及EDV均较术前降低,颈内动脉C1段远端PSV较术前升高(P均0.05)。CAS治疗前后颈内动脉C1段TTP变化值与其远端(管腔正常处)超声参数PSV、EDV变化值均呈正相关(r_s=0.500、0.522,P=0.049、0.038)。结论 CC-DSA可量化评估颈内动脉狭窄患者CAS治疗后血流动力学变化。     

Duplex ultrasound interpretation criteria for inferior mesenteric arteries

There is no specific duplex ultrasound (DUS) criteria for the diagnosis of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) stenosis. This study will define the optimal duplex velocity values with the best overall accuracy (OA) in detecting ≥50% stenosis of the IMAs. Eighty-five IMAs with both DUS and mesenteric arteriography were analyzed. Eighty-five IMAs were examined: 45 were normal, 12 with <50% stenosis, eight with ≥50-69% stenosis and 15 with ≥70% stenosis (including occlusion) based on angiography. The mean peak systolic velocities (PSVs) for a normal IMA, <50% and ≥50% stenosis was 105, 215 and 392 cm/second, respectively (P < 0.0001). The most accurate PSV in detecting ≥50% stenosis was ≥250 cm/second with a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 96% and an OA of 95%. The most accurate end-diastolic velocity (EDV) in detecting ≥50% stenosis was ≥80% or ≥90 cm/second, with an OA of 86%, a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 100%. The most accurate ratio in detecting ≥50% stenosis was ≥4 or ≥4.5 with an OA of 93%.Receiver operator curves analysis showed that the PSV was not better than EDV and PSV ratio in detecting ≥50% stenosis (P = 0.1661 and 0.4568, respectively). In conclusion, specific IMA PSVs, EDVs and IMA/aortic systolic ratios can be used in detecting significant IMA stenosis with reasonable accuracy.     

脑保护装置下支架置入术治疗重度颈动脉狭窄

目的探讨脑保护装置下行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)治疗重度颈动脉狭窄的近期疗效和安全性。方法回顾性分析2013年10月—2014年12月收治的48例接受CAS治疗的重度颈动脉狭窄患者临床资料,术后随访观察支架内再狭窄、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、脑卒中及死亡事件的发生率。结果48例患者均CAS成功,术前平均狭窄率为(85.27±11.52)%,术后残余狭窄率为(18.12±3.36)%,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。术后随访无新发TIA、脑梗死及死亡患者,但3例患者出现支架内重度再狭窄。结论支架置入术治疗重度颈动脉狭窄是安全、有效的,但远期疗效有待观察。     

Interposition grafts for difficult carotid artery reconstruction: a 17-year experience

Carotid interposition grafts (CIP) for carotid artery revascularization can be a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) for complex carotid disease. This is a retrospective review of the UCLA 17-year experience with CIP for carotid reconstruction. Carotid operations performed between 1988 and 2005 revealed 41 CIP procedures in 39 patients using polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, n = 31) or reversed greater saphenous vein (Vein) (n = 10). Perioperative data and long-term follow-up for each conduit were statistically compared. There were no significant differences in demographics, risk factors, operative indications, complications, or 30-day perioperative deaths. There was one postoperative stroke in each group, for an overall stroke rate of 4.9% (PTFE 3.2%, Vein 10%). There was one asymptomatic occlusion and there were two high-grade restenoses in the PTFE group compared with one asymptomatic occlusion and one high-grade restenosis in the Vein group. Overall primary patency was 90% and the assisted primary patency was 97% for the PTFE group (mean follow-up 50 months), whereas primary patency was 80% (mean follow-up 30 months) in the Vein group. CIP is a safe and effective technique with excellent long-term follow-up for complex carotid reconstruction when CEA or CAS may be contraindicated.     

Durability of carotid endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic stenoses

PURPOSE: Although many studies have well established that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is beneficial in selected patients with severe carotid disease, only a few large studies have focused on the durability of the surgical procedure. Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS) has recently been proposed as a potential alternative to CEA. We analyzed the incidence of late occlusion and recurrent stenosis after CEA. METHODS: Over 13 years 1000 patients underwent 1150 CEA procedures to treat symptomatic and asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis. CEA procedures involving either traditional CEA with patching (n = 302) or eversion CEA (n = 848) were all performed by the same surgeon, with patients under deep general anesthesia and cerebral protection involving continuous electroencephalographic monitoring for selective shunting. All patients underwent postoperative duplex ultrasound scanning and clinical follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. New neurologic events, late occlusions, and recurrent stenoses 50% or greater were recorded. Complete follow-up (mean, 6.2 years; range, 6-156 months) was obtained in 95% of patients (949 of 1000), for an overall average of 95% of procedures (1092 of 1150). Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier life table method. RESULTS: Perioperative (30-day) mortality rate was 0.3% (3 of 1000), and stroke rate was 0.9% (11 of 1150), with a combined mortality and stroke rate of 1.2%. The incidence of late occlusion and recurrent stenosis 70% or greater was 0.6% and 0.5%, respectively, with a combined occlusion and restenosis rate of 1.1%. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the rate of freedom from occlusion, restenosis 70% or greater, and combined occlusion and restenosis 70% or greater at 12 years was 99,4%, 99.5%, and 98.8%, respectively. Occlusion and restenosis developed asymptomatically. CONCLUSIONS: CEA is a low-risk procedure for treating severe symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid disease, with excellent long-term durability. Proponents of CAS should bear this in mind before considering CAS as a routine alternative to CEA.     

超声多普勒血流速度诊断肾动脉支架植入术后支架内再狭窄

目的 分析超声多普勒血流速度诊断支架植入术治疗重度粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄（ARAS）术后支架内再狭窄的价值。方法 回顾性分析85例（94条肾动脉）肾动脉支架植入术后重度ARAS患者，根据术后12个月超声造影（CEUS）所示支架内径狭窄比判定狭窄程度，以<30%为无再狭窄，30%~50%为轻度再狭窄，51%~70%为中度再狭窄，>70%为重度再狭窄；对比其支架内收缩期峰值血流速度（PSV）及肾动脉PSV与腹主动脉PSV比值（RAR）。采用受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析PSV、RAR对支架内再狭窄的诊断价值。结果 94条植入支架后肾动脉中，术后12个月2条支架闭塞。92条未闭塞动脉中，58条无再狭窄，15条轻度再狭窄，11条中度再狭窄，8条重度再狭窄。不同程度再狭窄肾动脉支架内PSV及RAR差异均有统计学意义（P均<0.01），且PSV、RAR随狭窄程度增高而逐渐加大（P均<0.05）。以PSV>162.50 cm/s作为判断支架内径狭窄比>30%的阈值，其敏感度、特异度均为100%；以RAR>2.28作为阈值，敏感度为100%，特异度为96.60%。对于支架内径狭窄比>50%，以PSV>219.55 cm/s作为诊断阈值，其敏感度为100%，特异度为98.60%；以RAR>3.17作为阈值，敏感度为100%，特异度为94.50%。以PSV>310.53 cm/s作为支架内径狭窄比>70%的诊断阈值，敏感度为100%，特异度为100%；以RAR>4.33作为阈值，敏感度为100%，特异度为100%。结论 超声多普勒血流速度对于诊断肾动脉支架植入术治疗重度ARAS术后支架内再狭窄的效能较高。     

Color-flow duplex scanning of carotid arteries: New velocity criteria based on receiver operator characteristic analysis for threshold stenoses used in the symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid trials

Purpose: Duplex scanning has become the standard for noninvasive evaluation of carotid arteries. However, current ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (16% to 49%, 50% to 79%, 80% to 99%) may not be applicable to the categories (30% to 49%, 50% to 69%, 70% to 99%) used in ongoing symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials. This study was undertaken to determine new velocity criteria consistent with these categories.Methods: From January 1, 1989 through October 30, 1992, 5871 color-flow duplex scans were obtained in our laboratories. After inadequate arteriograms and patients with a contralateral ICA occlusion were excluded, 770 peak systolic velocity (PSV) and 229 end-diastolic velocity (EDV) measurements were available for comparison with arteriography. ICA PSV and EDV were subjected to receiver operator characteristic curve analysis to determine optimum criteria for identifying stenoses of 30%, 50%, and 70%.Results: For 70% to 99% carotid artery stenosis, PSV greater than 130 plus EDV greater than 100 provided the best sensitivity (81%), specificity (98%), positive predictive value (89%), negative predictive value (96%), and overall accuracy (95%). For 50% to 69% stenosis, a PSV greater than 130 and EDV of 100 or less cm/sec proved to be the best combination: sensitivity (92%), specificity (97%), positive predictive value (93%), negative predictive value (99%), and accuracy (97%). Stenoses in the 30% to 49% range were less accurately identified.Conclusion: These redefined criteria may prove useful for analyzing duplex ultrasound velocity data in reference to the classification of ICA stenosis used in recent clinical trials of the safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy. (J VASC SURG 1994;19:818-28.)     

Duplex ultrasonography in the diagnosis of celiac and mesenteric artery occlusive disease

Duplex ultrasound criteria for the diagnosis of celiac and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusive disease have not been well defined. We performed a blinded retrospective comparison of mesenteric duplex data with arteriography in 24 consecutive patients who underwent both studies. Arteriography revealed that eight superior mesenteric arteries were normal; five were minimally stenotic; eight had stenoses greater than or equal to 50%, and three were occluded. Nine celiac arteries were normal or minimally stenotic; 12 had stenoses greater than or equal to 50%, and three were occluded. Duplex scans were obtained after an overnight fast. In normal superior mesenteric arteries, peak systolic velocity (PSV) was 134 +/- 18 cm/sec and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) was 24 +/- 4 cm/sec. Superior mesenteric artery PSV in patients with minimal or no stenosis (171 +/- 22 cm/sec) was less than PSV in patients with severe (greater than 50%) stenosis (299 +/- 40 cm/sec, p = 0.006), and less than PSV in patients with patent superior mesenteric arteries who underwent revascularization (366 +/- 86 cm/sec, p = 0.017). Similarly, EDV was elevated in superior mesenteric arteries with severe stenosis (78 +/- 11 cm/sec, p = 0.001) and in patients who underwent revascularization (111 +/- 19 cm/sec, p less than 0.001) compared to those with less than 50% stenosis (30 +/- 6 cm/sec, p = 0.001). An EDV greater than 45 cm/sec was the best indicator of severe stenosis (sensitivity, 1.0; specificity, 0.92). Peak systolic velocity greater than 300 cm/sec was less sensitive (0.63), but highly specific (1.0) for severe superior mesenteric artery stenosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal protection: experience in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND: Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) with cerebral embolic protection is a safe alternative to carotid endarterectomy in high-risk patients. Among the various systems proposed for cerebral protection, transcervical CAS avoids crossing the lesion without protection and eliminates the complications associated with transfemoral access. This study analyzes our experience and the results obtained with a transcervical stenting technique for carotid revascularization. METHODS: From January 2005 to June 2006, 62 CAS were performed in our center in high-risk patients with >70% stenosis (38.7% had a previous neurologic event and 61.3% were asymptomatic). The indications for CAS were severe heart disease (45.1%), severe pulmonary disease (6.4%), paralysis of the contralateral laryngeal nerve (6.4%), recurrent stenosis (3.2%), and high carotid lesion (1.6%). Twenty-one patients were >80 years old. A complete neurologic examination was performed by a stroke neurologist in all patients before and after stenting. The protection system used was carotid flow reversal by transcervical access. Transcranial Doppler monitoring was done during the procedure in 35 patients. We analyzed technical success, the presence of high-intensity transient signals during the procedure, neurologic morbidity and mortality at 30 days and 6 months, and stent patency at 6 months (range, 1 to 18 months). Technical success was 96.8%. Perioperative high-intensity transient signals were observed in two patients (5.7%). In the immediate postoperative period, one patient had a transient ischemic attack of the anterior cerebral artery and another had a stroke, with contralateral hemiplegia. At 48 hours after discharge, a third patient returned to the hospital with a severe cerebral hemorrhage that required surgical drainage; hence, neurologic morbidity was 4.9%. There were no deaths at 6 months. Among the total, 98.4% of the stents remained patent, two showed restenosis of 50% to 70%, and one restenosis of >70%. No patients presented a neurologic event during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Transcervical carotid artery stenting with flow reversal cerebral protection is a relatively simple, safe technique that avoids instrumentation of the aortic arch and crossing the target lesion without protection. It is less expensive than techniques requiring a filter device and provides excellent outcome with an acceptable incidence of complications.     

Surgical management of acute complications and critical restenosis following carotid artery stenting

Carotid artery angioplasty with stenting (CAS) is being increasingly used in the treatment of extracranial carotid artery stenosis. As in other catheter-based approaches to the treatment of arterial disease, surgical intervention may be required because of either acute complications or correct critical restenosis. We have reviewed our experience managing early complications and critical in-stent restenoses after CAS in a tertiary care university hospital and a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. During the last 5 years, 22 carotid arteries (21 patients) underwent CAS. One patient developed thrombosis and rupture of the carotid artery during stenting. Two other patients (3 arteries) developed critical restenosis within 12 months. Subsequent surgical reconstructions included an internal carotid artery (ICA)–to–external carotid artery (ECA) transposition and a common carotid artery (CCA)–to–ICA bypass with reversed saphenous vein (RSV). The patient who underwent CCA–to–ICA bypass later required subclavian–to–ICA bypass because of rapidly progressive intimal hyperplasia and subsequent occlusion of the CCA. The other patient has not had surgical repair because of his deteriorating condition and significant co-morbidities. During the same time period, two additional patients were referred from outside institutions specifically for surgical intervention after carotid stenting. One had delayed rupture of the carotid artery 1 day after stenting and underwent urgent surgical repair. Another patient had early, critical restenosis within the stent and underwent placement of a CCA–to–ICA interposition graft using RSV. Acute treatment failures after CAS can be successfully managed using standard surgical techniques. Patients who develop critical in-stent restenosis requiring surgical repair may need more challenging surgical reconstructions to maintain cerebral perfusion.     

Clinical significance of reversal of flow in the vertebral artery identified on cerebrovascular duplex ultrasound

Background

Reversal of flow in the vertebral artery (RFVA) is an uncommon finding on cerebrovascular duplex ultrasound examination. The clinical significance of RFVA and the natural history of patients presenting with it are poorly understood. Our objective was to better characterize the symptoms and outcomes of patients presenting with RFVA.