Retained gastric band port and tube 5 years after gastric band removal and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a case report

Background

While LAGB has become uncommon in the bariatric surgery practice, band removal with or without revision surgery is still common. Retained postoperative foreign body, of which surgical sponges are the most common, is a rare condition. We report a rare case of retained gastric band port and the attached tube.

Case presentation

A 31-year-old Caucasian female presented to the outpatient clinic, 5?years after her last surgery, complaining of a left upper quadrant abdominal mass over the last 2?years. She had a history of 2 weight loss operations. She had no significant family history nor smoking. CT of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a retained foreign body. On exploration, the port with 10?cm of the connected tube was found and removed through a small incision without laparotomy. The patient made an uneventful recovery.

Conclusion

A bariatric surgeon should be involved in the evaluation of any patient who complains of abdominal pain and/or palpable mass if she/he has a previous weight loss procedure because the bariatric surgeon is fully aware of the possible complications of the bariatric surgeries.

     

Lymphadenectomy in gastric carcinoma?

Lymphadenectomy in gastric carcinoma is still discussed. Based on non-randomised and randomised studies D2-lymphadenectomy is indicated only in R0-resections. D2-lymph-node dissection requires great experience with this technique as well as for the management of possible postoperative complications. Survival advantages can be expected in patients with a limited nodal involvement, a favorable lymph node ratio between resected and involved nodes and in stage II disease. Therefore, survival improvement can be expected in 15-20 % of all R0-resections. Despite these limited prognostic advantages D2-lymphadenectomy should be performed in all R0-procedures since only the pathologic data of the resected specimen supply reliable prognostic parameter. If in the future sentinel lymphadenectomy allows selection criteria for a balanced indication for D2-lymphadenectomy in gastric carcinoma, needs to be awaited.     

Adjustable gastric banding as revisional bariatric procedure after failed gastric bypass—intermediate results

BackgroundAlthough gastric bypass is the most common bariatric procedure in the United States, it is has been associated with a failure rate of 15% (range 5–40%). The addition of an adjustable gastric band to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has been reported to be a useful revision strategy in a small series of patients with inadequate weight loss after proximal gastric bypass.MethodsWe report on 22 patients who presented with inadequate weight loss or significant weight regain after proximal gastric bypass. All patients underwent revision with the placement of an adjustable silicone gastric band around the proximal gastric pouch. The bands were adjusted at 6 weeks postoperatively and beyond, as needed. Complications and weight loss at the most recent follow-up visit were evaluated.ResultsThe mean age and body mass index at revision was 41.27 years (range 25–58) and 44.8 ± 6.34 kg/m², respectively. Patients had experienced a loss of 19%, 27%, 47.3%, 42.3%, 43%, and 47% of their excess weight at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after the revisional procedure, respectively. Three major complications occurred requiring reoperation. No band erosions have been documented.ConclusionThe results from this larger series of patients have also indicated that the addition of the adjustable silicone gastric band causes significant weight loss in patients with poor weight loss outcomes after gastric bypass. That no anastomosis or change in absorption is required makes this an attractive revisional strategy. As with all revisional procedures, the complication rates appear to be increased compared with a similar primary operation.     

Intragastric penetration of a gastric band -- a severe complication after gastric banding?

In morbid obese patients the adjustable laparoscopic gastric banding is an effective procedure with a widespread acceptance. Pouch dilatation, band slipping, port-penetration and port infection are the most known complications. We report on three patients with a penetration of an adjustable gastric band. The main symptom of penetration was the increase of weight. The reasons for penetration are a lesion of the serosa intraoperatively or a overfilling of the band. In our patients the treatment was in two cases the explantation of the band. In one case the patient showed no signs of peritonitis and didn't want the explantation of the band. Our recommendation in case of penetration is the removal of the band, because every penetration can be the source of a lethal outcome.     

Conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: Sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass?

BackgroundIn the literature, late complications and treatment failures in laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) have been reported. When the patient presents with failure of LAGB, surgeons have the option to convert it to a different procedure. The aim of our study is to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of converting LAGB to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB).MethodsBetween March 2008 and October 2012, a total of 54 patients underwent conversion of LAGB at our institution. Of these patients, 41 (75.9%) were converted to LRYGB, and 13 (24.1%) patients were converted to LSG. A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed, noting the outcomes and complications of the procedure.ResultsMean body mass index at the time of conversion was 41.8±6.5 kg/m² in LRYGB and 39.0±6.6 kg/m² in LSG. Mean percentage of excess weight loss was 57.4%±17.0% and 62.4%±19.6% in LRYGB, and it was 47.7%±4.2% and 65.6%±34.5% in LSG at 12 months (P>.34) and 24 months (P>.79) after conversion. Of LRYGB patients, 7 (17.5%) were readmitted as a result of abdominal pain, dehydration, and nausea/vomiting, and 4 (10.0%) patients required reoperation. One LSG patient (8.3%) was readmitted for new-onset severe reflux and underwent hiatal hernia repair. She was converted to LRYGB 32 months after the LSG procedure. Readmission rate (P>.61) and reoperation rate (P>.63) did not show statistical difference between the 2 procedures.ConclusionConverting LAGB to LSG and LRYGB both seem feasible and resulted in substantial further weight loss.     

Does laparoscopic gastric banding create hiatal hernias?

BackgroundWe hypothesized that laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) placement might result in the development of a hiatal hernia (HH) over time. The objective of our study was to determine whether HHs develop after LAGB in the setting of a university hospital.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all outcomes for consecutive LAGB patients in our institutional, longitudinal prospective bariatric surgical database to identify those patients without evidence of a HH at LAGB placement, who subsequently underwent delayed HH repair.ResultsFrom 2005 to 2009, 695 gastric bands were implanted. Twelve patients (1.72%) were identified who had no radiographic or intraoperative evidence of a HH at LAGB placement and who subsequently underwent HH repair at re-exploration. Patients presented 18 ± 10 months after band placement. Of these patients, 75% presented with gastroesophageal reflux disease or food intolerance (50% with gastroesophageal reflux disease alone). Also, 2 presented with acute pain due to band slippage and 1 with chronic pain and vomiting. In 50% of the patients, revision procedures detected the HH at operation despite negative preoperative studies.ConclusionIn our series, a significant HH developed in 1.7% of LAGB patients who had no clinically identifiable HH at LAGB placement. Persistent dysphagia after band deflation requires careful inspection of the hiatus during surgical revision, even in the absence of radiologic depiction of HH, and might represent an underlying etiology of LAGB dysfunction. This complication, along with esophageal dilation and annular pouch dilation, might represent a constellation of conditions with a common etiology. From the results of our small series, we raise the question of the existence of chronic backpressure created by LAGB restriction and accounting for these complications.     

Non-curative gastric resection for patients with stage 4 gastric cancer—a single center experience and current review of literature

Purpose

The majority of patients with gastric cancer present with an advanced stage and, therefore, may not be eligible for curative treatment. The role of non-curative gastric resection in situations other than emergency treatment for life threatening tumor-related complications is still under discussion.

Methods

Data from 290 consecutive patients with advanced gastric cancer who were treated in our hospital were analyzed. A total of 48 patients underwent primary non-curative gastric resection.

Results

The overall survival in the non-curatively resected group was 15?months and 6?months for non-resected patients, respectively (p?Conclusions Primary non-curative gastric resection can reduce the incidence of severe tumor-related complications and can prolong overall survival in selected subgroups. In particular, younger patients with no more than two tumor locations should be considered for this procedure.     

Is lymphadenectomy needed for all submucosal gastric cancers?

OBJECTIVE: To find out if it is feasible to extend the indication for local resection of submucosal gastric cancer without increasing the risk of lymph node metastases. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital, Japan. SUBJECTS: 104 patients with gastric cancer confined to the submucosal layer who underwent conventional gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy. INTERVENTIONS: The risk of nodal metastases was analysed retrospectively depending on the depth of submucosal invasion, size of the tumour, and other clinicopathological findings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The degree of submucosal invasion, size of the tumour, and incidence of lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: 15/104 patients (14%) had lymph node metastases. No patient in whom submucosal invasion was less than 500 microm or tumour was less than 15 mm in diameter developed lymph node metastases. Fewer patients had lymphatic permeation (37/89) and venous involvement (21/89) in the group without lymph node metastases. CONCLUSION: These data seem to support the hypothesis that early, minimally invasive, gastric cancer measuring < 15 mm in diameter could be treated by endoscopic mucosal or local resection, and gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy might be unnecessary.     

Delayed gastric emptying and typical scintigraphic gastric curves in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease: could pyloromyotomy improve this condition?

Background/Purposes

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a cofactor in the etiopathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Scintigraphy is the criterion standard to evaluate gastric emptying (GE). This study aims to define typical scintigraphic activity-time curves (ATCs) related to DGE and esophageal atresia (EA) and to demonstrate the effectiveness of pyloromyotomy (P) in improving GE.

Methods

Since 2002, 83 children underwent Nissen fundoplication. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group I, GORD-only patients; group II, patients with GORD owing to OA. Depending on preoperative scintigraphy, each group was subdivided into 2 subgroups. Before surgery and 1 year after, endoscopy and scintigraphy were performed. In the presence of DGE, P was associated with Nissen fundoplication. Gastric emptying differences at baseline and at follow-up were estimated by the Student t test. Pre- and post-ATCs were evaluated by the χ² test.

Results

During follow-up, GE completely normalized in subgroups with DGE. Scintigraphic ATC analysis documented an association between DGE and a typical rectilinear fitting, with a higher rate in OA patients. After P, the scintigraphic pattern changed in an exponential manner related to a faster GE.

Conclusions

Delayed gastric emptying is frequent in OA, and the scintigraphic ATCs are typical. Pyloromyotomy is a safe and effective technique to fully normalize GE.     

Ménétrier's disease and gastric cancer

Ménétrier's disease is an infrequent hypertrophic disease of the stomach associated with hypoproteinemia of unknown etiology. This disease is considered to be premalignant since 10-15% of affected individuals develop gastric cancer. We present a 66-year-old patient who had received a diagnosis of Ménétrier's disease 13 years previously and who was found to have advanced antral gastric cancer during follow-up. We provide an update on the optimal therapeutic approach, which has not been clearly defined to date.     

Does experience preclude leaks in laparoscopic gastric bypass?

Background Improved outcomes of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) have been demonstrated once pratice has moved beyond the learning curve. However, there is no evidence that experience has a favorable impact on the incidence of leaks. This study evaluated the incidence of staple-line leaks as experience accrued in a university-based bariatric surgery program. Methods Prospectively collected data on our first 200 patients undergoing LRYGB since July 1998 were analyzed. Linear staplers were used to divide the stomach and to create a side-to-side jejunojejunostomy. A side-to-side cardiojejunostomy was created using a 21-mm circular stapler. Patient characteristics, operative data, and outcomes were evaluated chronologically with comparison of outcomes between quartiles. Results Staple-line leaks developed in 9 (4.5%) of the first 200 patients undergoing LRYGB. Among the 200 patients were 190 women (95%). The median age of the patients was 48 years (ranges, 24–62 years), and their body mass index was 43 kg/m² (ranges, 32–59 kg/m²). As surgeons’ experience increased over time, there was a significant increase in the weight of patients and the percentage of patients with previous abdominal operations. There also was a significant decrease in conversion rates and operative times. Leaks occurred in six patients at the cardiojejunostomy (3%), in two patients jejunojejunostomy (1%), and in one patient at the excluded stomach (0.5%). Of the 50 leaks that occurred in each quartile, there were in the 3 in the 1st quartile, 1 in the 2nd quartile, 2 in the 3rd quartile, 3 in the 4th quartile. The differences were not significant. There was no correlation between the number of LRYGBs, and the occurrence of a leak (p = 0.59 confidence interval −0.13–0.22). Conclusions The incidence of staple-line leaks appears to be independent of the number of LRYGBs performed. These data suggest that surgeons’ experience may not eliminate anastomotic complications experienced by patients undergoing LRYGB. Presented in part at the 13th International Congress and Endo Expo, the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons Annual Meeting, New York, September 29 to October 2, 2004     

Can esophageal pH monitoring predict delayed gastric emptying?

Background/Purpose

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is frequent in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and may require additional investigation. The current study assesses whether relative esophageal exposure, postprandial (PP) versus fasting, diagnosed by pH monitoring could predict DGE.

Methods

Thirty patients with GERD underwent extended esophageal pH monitoring and were assigned as DGE or non-DGE according to scintigraphy. The PP to fasting ratio for reflux index, relative frequency of long episodes in PP, and distribution of the longest episode were used to assess the relative esophageal exposure. The effectiveness of these parameters to predict DGE was estimated; the cutoffs for continuous variables were chosen with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and the probabilities were calculated using a logistic regression model.

Results

The area under the ROC curve of PP to fasting ratio for reflux index was greater than that of relative frequency of long episodes in PP. There was a good equilibrium between sensitivity and specificity at a PP to fasting ratio of 1. A PP to fasting ratio greater than 1, ie, a reflux index in PP greater than in fasting, presented a sensitivity of 93% and a negative predictive value of 91%. The occurrence of the longest episode in PP had a specificity of 94% and a positive predictive value of 89%. A reflux index greater in PP plus a longest episode in PP presented a 94% probability of DGE; a reflux index greater in fasting plus a longest episode in fasting had a 95% probability of non-DGE. These combinations represented 60% of the series.

Conclusions

PP to fasting ratio for reflux index and distribution of the longest episode seem accurate to identify DGE; thus, additional investigation to assess gastric emptying may be avoided in the majority of patients.     

Conversion from one-anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: when and why—a single-center experience of all consecutive OAGB procedures

BackgroundOne-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a well-established treatment method in patients with morbid obesity. Its long-term impact on de novo reflux, anastomotic complications, and malnutrition needs further evaluation. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a technically feasible procedure in revisional bariatric surgery. This study presents our institutional data on conversion from OAGB to RYGB.ObjectiveTo determine the reasons for conversion, preoperative endoscopic findings, and feasibility of revisional bariatric surgery after OAGB.SettingUniversity hospital in AustriaMethodsRetrospective analysis of a prospectively fed database. All patients undergoing OAGB between January 2012 and December 2019 were included. Screening was carried out for all patients needing conversion to RYGB. Percent total weight loss, percent excess weight loss, time to conversion, postoperative complications, and reasons for conversion were assessed.ResultsEighty-two of 1,025 patients who underwent OAGB were converted laparoscopically to RYGB. Seven patients were converted early because of anastomotic/gastric tube leakage. Median time to late conversion was 29.1 ± 24.3 months, mean percent excess weight loss was 86.6% ± 33.1% and percent total weight loss was 35.1% ± 13.5%. Forty-two patients were converted because of reflux, 11 because of persistent marginal ulcers, 10 because of anastomotic stenosis, 9 because of malnutrition, and 3 because of weight regain. Seven patients showed Barrett’s metaplasia in biopsies at the gastroesophageal junction before conversion.ConclusionLaparoscopic conversion from OAGB to RYGB is technically feasible with a moderate rate of postoperative complications. Severe (bile) reflux is a serious long-term complication after OAGB, with 4.1% of patients needing conversion to RYGB. Endoscopy after OAGB in patients showing clinical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease is strongly advised to detect underlying pathologic changes.     

Evaluation of gastric tube with esophageal Thermister (Thermosump®)

The accuracy and the feasibility of esophageal temperature measured by a new gastric tube. Thermosump^®, which is incorporated with a esophageal thermister, was evaluated in anesthetized dogs (n = 6) and men (n = 59). In dogs, esophageal temperature measured by Thermosump^® was correlated well with the temperatures measured by the conventional esophageal thermister, and also by the pulmonary artery catheter (r = 0.98, 0.98, respectively). In anesthetized men, correlation between esophageal temperature by Thermosump^® and rectal, or bladder temperature was good during surgery of extremities (r = 0.81, 0.80, respectively). But during abdominal surgery, correlation between esophageal and bladder temperature was relatively poor (r = 0.50). Insertion of the tube, and suction of gastric fluid through the tube were easy without any complication. This newly developed gastric tube with a esophageal thermister was safe, and useful for measuring esophageal temperature.(Koyama K, Ochiai R, Takahashi J, et al.: Evaluation of gastric tube with esophageal thermister (Thermosump^®). J Anesth 6: 372–375, 1992)