Inequalities in the provision of NHS primary care dental services in Scotland in 2004.

OBJECTIVE: To assess inequalities in the provision of National Health Service (NHS) primary care dental services between Health Boards and the four provider groups (General Dental Service [GDS] non-specialist, GDS salaried, specialist working in primary care, Community Dental Service [CDS]) in Scotland. METHODS: A postal questionnaire survey of all dentists (N=2852) registered with the General Dental Council at an address in Scotland was undertaken. The following were assessed: the proportion of primary care dentists not accepting new children/adults for NHS care or using a waiting list, the proportion of dentists working in wheelchair-accessible surgeries, furthest distance travelled by patients to primary care surgery in an average week, waiting time for routine NHS treatment, and the proportion of dentists offering weekend or evening appointments to NHS patients. Data were analysed by Health Board and the four provider groups. RESULTS: A total of 2134 (74.8%) completed questionnaires were returned. One thousand, five hundred and seventy-seven dentists (73.9%) of the respondents were providing NHS primary care dental services for at least part of each week. There was a wide variation in the provision of NHS primary care dental services between Health Boards. Borders, Dumfries and Galloway, and Grampian performed poorly on most indicators, whereas Lanarkshire, Greater Glasgow, and Argyll and Clyde generally performed well. The CDS scored well on most indicators of service provision. There were problems with the provision of specialist dental services in primary care, and GDS services provided by Health Boards. CONCLUSIONS: Because the problem issues differed between Health Boards and the four provider groups, it is likely that both local and national solutions are required to improve the provision of services. Further research on service demand is required to confirm the apparent inequalities in provision suggested by the study.     

Service mix in general dental practices employing and not employing dental hygienists

Abstract Service mix studies conducted in Australia have indicated a low provision of periodontal services. The service mix in Australian general dental practices employing dental hygienists has not been studied. This study compares the service mix between 18 practices employing hygienists and 29 practices not employing hygienists in Adelaide. Practices employing hygienists tended to be larger group practices, with younger dentists seeing a younger set of patients. Practices employing dental hygienists provided a mean of 97.9 services to 57.2 patients over 2 days, significantly higher than the mean of 68.8 procedures to 39.1 patients in practices not employing dental hygienists. Comparing the % of procedures provided in treatment categories as a ratio of total procedures, practices employing dental hygienists provided significantly more periodontal procedures and less oral surgery, prosthetic and restorative procedures. Periodontally-related services accounted for an average of 37.7% of procedures in practices employing dental hygienists compared with 18.9% in practices not employing dental hygienists (p(0.05). Periodontal and preventive treatment of 50.7%) of patients in practices employing hygienists was delegated to a hygienist, and the level of delegation of periodontally-related procedures was 77.2%. Over 90% of procedures performed by hygienists were periodontally-related, with the removal of subgingival calculus accounting for 57.7% of all procedures provided by dental hygienists. In conclusion, practices employing hygienists had a more periodontally-orientated service mix, with hygienists acting to complement the services of dentists in the provision of periodontal services, rather than as a substitute for the dentist.     

Dissertations 25 years after date 24. Barriers to effective periodontal care

In the thesis 'Barriers to effective periodontal care, published in 1984, an investigation was described on professional periodontal care lagging behind the development of periodontology. The objectives of the investigation were to assess whether dentists were treating periodontal disease as a behavioural problem using effective communication techniques, and whether serious periodontal disease had such low frequency that dentists had not the opportunity to become experienced in recognizing the disease. It was concluded that serious periodontal disease had a low frequency and was not influenced by communication on periodontal care. After 25 years, these conclusions are still valid: the percentage of risk patients is still 5-10% and the correlation between seriousness of periodontal disease and periodontal care provided is still limited. Not all dentists do have affinity to periodontal care, but they do have affinity to practical aspects, such as removing dental calculus deposits. A classification of obvious recognizable diseases and treatments would make periodontal care more manageable for dentists.     

Dental Care for Pregnant Women

BackgroundThe authors conducted a study to examine factors associated with general dentists' provision of care for pregnant women and the extent to which they provide comprehensive dental care.MethodsThe authors mailed an 86-item questionnaire to 1,000 practicing general dentists in North Carolina. Survey domains included provider knowledge about pregnancy and dental health, dental treatment practices, barriers to providing care, outcome expectancy, and personal and practice demographics. The primary dependent variables the authors analyzed were whether dentists provided any treatment to pregnant women and, among those who did, the extent to which they provided comprehensive services. The authors performed multivariate regression analyses to determine factors associated with dentists' provision of care to pregnant women (P < .05).ResultsA total of 513 surveys were returned (a response rate of 51.3 percent), of which 495 surveys had complete responses. The authors included the completed surveys in their analyses. The mean age of the respondents was 46 years. The results of multivariate analysis showed that respondents who perceived a lack of demand for services among pregnant women and provided preconception counseling were less likely to provide any treatment for pregnant patients than were those who perceived a demand for services and who did not provide preconception counseling, respectively. Dentists who were male, had a low knowledge score, provided preconception counseling and treated largely white populations of patients were less likely than female dentists, those who had moderate or high knowledge scores, and those who treated a population of minority patients to provide comprehensive care for pregnant women.ConclusionsMost general dentists in private practice provide care for pregnant women, but the authors found notable gaps in dental provider knowledge and comprehensive dental services available for pregnant women.Clinical ImplicationsAlthough many general dentists provide some dental care to pregnant women, more should be done to ensure that this care is comprehensive.     

Variations in self-reported provision of services by general dentists in private practice

BackgroundVariations in dentists&;apos; provision of services have been documented, but information about contributing factors is limited.MethodsThe authors used responses to a 2003 survey of general dentists in private practice in California (46 percent response rate; 3,098 dentists included in the final sample) to assess variations in service provision and its correlates. They used logistic regressions to assess the correlation of various characteristics with the self-reported percentage of time spent providing services.ResultsThe results show variations in services provided by general dentists in private practice. Multiple factors, including the dentist&;apos;s sex, region of practice, employment of hygienists, patients&;apos; race and population income in the area of practice were significantly and independently associated with provision of services.ConclusionsThe survey results reflect practice variations that existed before the latest economic downturn, which resulted in a loss of jobs and medical and dental insurance. The data serve as the baseline for future studies of changes in dental practice and for assessing the impact of the 2010 health care reform legislation on dental practice.Practice ImplicationsImprovements in oral health care, the recent economic decline and health care reform may lead to changes in dental practice and in the dental workforce.     

Undergraduate student experience in dental service delivery in rural South Australia: an analysis of costs and benefits

BACKGROUND: Rural experience for dental students can provide valuable clinical education, change attitudes to rural practice, and make a valuable contribution to clinical service provision. The aim of this paper is to assess the costs and benefits of service delivery by students through rural training programmes. METHODS: Groups of two students worked in the public dental clinics in adjacent rural centres where there had been long-term difficulties in recruiting staff. The costs and benefits of the programme were assessed by the impact on waiting lists, the total cost per patient of a course of care and by the marginal cost of adding service provision by students to existing arrangements. RESULTS: The total costs of emergency and complete treatment provided by students were greater than the costs of treatment provided by public-sector dentists but less than the costs of private providers treating public patients. However, the value of services were greater when care was provided by students or private providers and the marginal cost of students providing services was 50-70 per cent of the cost of care provided by public dentists. CONCLUSION: This assessment suggests that the service benefits achieved compliment the primary objective of influencing the attitude of students to rural practice.     

Evaluation of a continuing education intervention "Periodontics in General Practice"

Abstract Evidence exists that some dentists may be failing to perform adequate periodontal diagnostic and preventive care for their patients. Continuing education (CE) is an avenue that is frequently employed as a strategy to alter the style of practice. This paper presents an evaluation of a year-long continuing education intervention “Periodontics in General Practice”, conducted among randomly selected private general dental practices in Adelaide. South Australia. The CE intervention featured a 1-day seminar, bi-monthly newsletters, individualised 3-monthly comparative feedback, and technical assistance. The study employed a longitudinal quasi-experimental design, which allowed for evaluation of the effectiveness of the intervention among practices employing hygienists (n: = 12) and not employing dental hygienists (n: = 12), taking into account the covariates of baseline level of provision of periodontal services, the practice's level of participation in the intervention and attendance at other CE courses in periodontics over the year. A comparison group of practice (n: = 12) did not participate in the intervention over the year. Patient record audits, conducted at baseline and at 12 months, provided data for the evaluation of the effect of the intervention on the recording of periodontal diagnostic, preventive and treatment items. Practices participating in the intervention showed increases in the percentage of records containing at least one periodontal diagnostic notation, and those practices employing hygienists showed an increase in the percentage of records with at least one preventive notation and one treatment item. Using ANCOVA to account for covariation, the main effect of the study group was significant in explaining changes in the provision of preventive periodontal services. The results indicate that an extended continuing education intervention can have significant effect on the provision of periodontal services, and that the magnitude of the effect differs between practices employing and not employing hygienists.     

Gender differences in career and practice patterns of PGD-trained dentists

This study compares differences by gender in the practice patterns and professional activities of general dentists, specialists, and dentists with Advanced Education in General Dentistry (AEGD) or General Practice Residency (GPR) training. The UCLA School of Dentistry surveyed a random sample of 6,725 dentists graduating from dental school in 1989, 1993, and 1997 as part of an evaluation of the impact of federal funding on postgraduate general dentist (PGD) programs. The survey asked about current practice, services referred and provided, and professional activities. Of the 2,029 dentists (30 percent) who responded, 49 percent were general dentists with no specialty training; 7 percent had AEGD training; 20 percent had GPR training; and 24 percent had specialty training. General dentists were more likely to be in private practice (p < 0.05). AEGDs, specialists, and females were more likely to report faculty positions as a secondary occupation. General dentists were more likely to be practice owners than AEGD- or GPR-trained dentists. The mean number of patients seen was highest for specialists. Females reported fewer patients than males, and this difference was significant for GPR-trained dentists. With respect to services, GPR-trained dentists reported significantly more biopsy procedures, conscious sedation, periodontal surgery, and implants than general dentists. AEGD-trained dentists reported more conscious sedation than general dentists. GPR dentists were more likely to volunteer time than general dentists without specialty training. PGD training appears to result in different types of employment and specific practice patterns that strengthen primary care dentistry. We further conclude that there are gender differences in the types of practice, patients seen, and services provided. These findings occur in addition to training differences.     

Dental service provision in Victorian residential aged care facilities

BACKGROUND: The Australian population is ageing, and a growing proportion of elderly Australians are now living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). These residents are at high risk of developing dental diseases, have more teeth present now than at any time in the past 50 years and often have difficulty maintaining adequate oral hygiene. Traditionally, dental service provision has been problematic and sporadic for these residents. METHODS: A postal survey of a random sample of Victorian general dentists and Directors of Nursing (DONs) of Victorian RACFs was undertaken in 2006 to ascertain the participation of dentists in the provision of dental care and to identify factors impacting on the organization and provision of dental care for residents. RESULTS: The response rate for dentists was 57.3 per cent, and for DONs 64.4 per cent. Half of the dentists reported that they had provided care to residents of aged care facilities in the past 12 months, and they spent an average of one hour per month providing care. Overall, dentists were concerned with their level of undergraduate education and training in various aspects of dentistry for residents of aged care facilities. DONs reported significant difficulty obtaining adequate dental care for their residents. Common problems identified by both dentists and DONs included a preference for dentists to treat residents in their own practice, dentists not willing to go to RACFs and a lack of portable dental equipment for dentists to use. CONCLUSIONS: There were low levels of interest and participation from Victorian dentists in providing dental care for residents of aged care facilities. Dentists had a strong preference for treating patients at their own practice, and there were a number of significant barriers that appeared to impact on the provision of dental care in RACFs.     

Periodontal Care and Treatment Provision by General Dentists in France

AimIn many countries, periodontal surgery is mainly provided by periodontists. This specialty is not recognised in France, where periodontal care and treatment are principally the responsibility of general dentists (GDs). The objective of this study was to investigate the periodontal care provided and factors associated with the treatment of periodontal diseases, including periodontal surgery, by GDs in France.MethodsA national cross-sectional survey of GDs practicing in the French metropolitan area was conducted in 2019. A self-administered questionnaire was sent by mail to the GDs selected by stratified simple random sampling. It included questions on respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics and their periodontal practice. A multivariate logistic regression model was employed to identify the factors associated with the practice of periodontal surgery by GDs.ResultsThree hundred eighty-five GDs responded (response rate, 23.4%). Their mean age was 45.2 years; 51.2% were male and 83.6% were in private practice. They reported performing selective periodontal examinations such as pocket probing on average for 34.2% of their patients, but only 5.5% of them performed them systematically. Several variables were significantly associated with the provision of periodontal surgical procedures such as the gender of the GDs, full mouth periodontal probing, implantology practice, insufficient fees, or uncertainty about treatment procedure. This survey confirmed the referral of patients for periodontal surgery by a minority of practitioners. It also highlighted insufficient screening and diagnostic procedures for periodontal diseases by GDs.ConclusionsThere is a need to improve French GDs’ periodontal skills and knowledge and to address other barriers that currently limit their ability to deliver comprehensive periodontal care.     

Sedation in Wales: a questionnaire

AIM: To identify the current provision of sedation in primary dental care in Wales. DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey. SETTING: Wales 2003. SUBJECTS AND MATERIALS: Questionnaires were sent to all dentists appearing on the Dentists Register with addresses in Wales (n = 1374). The questionnaires sought details on personal status, use of and training in conscious sedation techniques. RESULTS: In total 951 (69%) questionnaires were returned, 720 (90%) respondents worked in a primary dental care setting. Only 87 (12.1%) primary care dentists offered some form of sedation. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of conscious sedation services in primary dental care in Wales is poor.     

The dental equipment needs and problems associated with the provision of dental services in remote areas

Dental services, facilities and equipment are inseparable and interdependent. The provision of all three is influenced by socio-economic factors. Prominent among these is the powerful competition for scarce resources to meet other health needs. In planning health programmes the perception of dentists, the community and health administrators will differ. In this competitive situation the planning of dental services, and hence the choice of equipment needed, must be based upon knowledge of the oral health status of the community to be served. The community's level of interest and likely cooperation is of great importance. Unsuitable services must not be imposed but at the same time the dental profession's educational role should be maintained. Establishing a balance between treatment needs and preventive programmes will influence the provision of equipment just as much as it will determine the choice of personnel. Standards of care should not be judged on the basis of elaborate facilities and exotic equipment. The choice of equipment must be related to the level of service to be provided at its site of use. Planners must consult with the dentists concerned if the provision of inappropriate equipment is to be avoided.     

Patterns of oral care in dental school and general dental practice

This study compared patterns of oral care provided by predoctoral dental students for patients seeking treatment at the University of Washington (UW) with patterns reported for general dental offices by the Washington Dental Service (WDS). Dental care included about 5 million services provided to 880,317 patients by 2,803 WDS general dentists and about 45,600 dental services provided to 9,488 patients by 155 UW dental students during 1999. There was high fidelity between databases and randomly surveyed patient records for treatment provided in both UW (95 percent) and WDS (97 percent) populations. While patient age patterns were generally similar, UW students completed more procedures for young children and for adults older than seventy-four years but completed fewer procedures for age groups of from thirteen to eighteen and from forty-five to fifty-four than general dental offices. The relative mix of all services completed by UW and WDS providers was similar (ANOVA, P=0.82). Within categories of service, the percentage of total services completed by students compared to those submitted by community dentists to WDS was about the same for examinations, radiographs, fluoride and sealants, amalgams, composites, single crowns, and endodontics. The percentage of total procedures completed showed a greater emphasis by UW students on inlays/onlays, dentures, extractions, and periodontal maintenance, and lesser experience with implants, orthodontics, sedation, and emergency procedures than general dental offices. We conclude that the relative distribution of clinical services provided by UW dental students is comparable to those procedures reported to WDS by dental offices in the adjacent community.     

Service provision trends among Australian private general dental practitioners: 1983/84 to 1998/99

AIM: To investigate time trends in service provision. DESIGN: Four cross-sectional surveys across a 15-year period. SETTING: Australian private general practice. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of dentists. METHODS: Dentists were surveyed by mailed questionnaire in 1983, 1988, 1993 and 1998 (response rates 71%-75%). Data were weighted to provide representative estimates for the age by sex distribution of private general practitioners in 1983, 1988, 1993 and 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Services per visit, annual services per dentist, annual services per patient. RESULTS: Total services per visit increased over the study period from 1.78 to 2.14 (Poisson regression; p < 0.05). However the annual number of services provided per dentist did not vary significantly, reflecting a trend among dentists to supply fewer patient visits per year. The annual number of services provided per patient increased over the period from 3.47 to 5.22 (OLS regression; p < 0.05), reflecting both the increased service rate per visit and increased numbers of visits by patients. Dentists provided less restorative, prosthodontic and extraction services per year, but more endodontic and crown and bridge services. The pattern of annual care received per patient also included more endodontic and crown and bridge services but differed from the dentist pattern through increased service rates over the study period in areas such as restorative, diagnostic and preventive. CONCLUSIONS: While dentists are providing a similar number of services annually, the content of their workload has changed to include less emphasis on removal and replacement of teeth and more effort on maintenance and retention of natural dentitions.     

Barriers to dental care in an elderly population resident in an inner city area

A sample of 765 elderly people living in London was interviewed and examined. Barriers to dental care stemmed from: elderly people's beliefs that dentures should last a life-time and dental visits are unnecessary for edentulous persons: mobility difficulties; fear; problems with access to NHS care and with access to satisfactory care. The attitudes of general dental practitioners, community dentists and final year dental students towards elderly people were favourable. Sixty per cent of surgeries were on the ground floor, and 46 per cent of premises were unsuitable for wheelchair access. Carers wanted improvement in domiciliary services. The provision of domiciliary care was significantly related to training. There was a paucity of experience in this field amongst dental students. Community dentists recognized a need for retraining before providing care for handicapped elderly people.     

Iowa dentists’ involvement in care for patients who are homebound

This study investigated the frequency of Iowa dentists’ provision of in‐office and out‐of‐office dental care for people who are homebound, as well as comparing the practice and educational characteristics among dentists who did and did not provide care for patients who were homebound. The authors mailed a survey form to all licensed dentists on the Iowa State Health Professional license database (n = 1,168), excluding pediatric dentists and orthodontists. A second mailing was sent to all nonrespondents four months later, resulting in 638 returned forms for a 54.6% response rate. The questionnaire included two outcome responses associated with the treatment in the dentist's office or in the patient's home for patients who are homebound. About 40% of Iowa dentists reported providing care in the office to patients who are homebound, but care outside of the office was provided by fewer dentists (6%) who had more years of practice experience. These results suggest an increased sense of professional or community responsibility among these older Iowa dentists. Education efforts may increase homebound care and more involvement of younger dentists.     

Trends in service provision among Australian private general dental practitioners over a 20-year period

AIM: To-investigate time trends in service provision. DESIGN: Five cross-sectional surveys across a 20-year period. SETTING: Australian private general practice PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of dentists. METHODS: Mailed questionnaires were collected in 1983, 1988, 1993, 1998 and 2003 (response rates 71%-76%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Services per visit, annual services per dentist; annual services per patient. RESULTS: Total services per visit increased over the study period from 1.78 to 2.37 (Poisson regression; P<0.05). However the annual number of services provided per dentist did not vary significantly, reflecting a trend among dentists to supply fewer patient visits per year. The annual number of services provided per patient increased from 3.47 to 5.50 (OLS regression; P<0.05), reflecting both increased service rates per visit and increased numbers of visits by patients. Dentists provided less restorative, prosthodontic and extraction services per year, but more diagnostic, preventive, endodontic and crown and bridge services. The annual care received per patient also included more diagnostic, preventive, endodontic and crown and bridge services but differed from the dentist pattern through increased rates of restorative services over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The content of dentist workloads has changed to include less emphasis on removal and replacement of teeth and more effort on diagnosis and prevention aimed at retention of natural dentitions.     

Dentists' Attitudes and Practices Toward Provision of Orthodontic Treatment for Children with Visual and Hearing Impairments

The objective of this study was to determine differences in behavior and attitudes of dentists in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in providing orthodontic care for children who are sensory impaired. A self‐administered questionnaire was sent to all dentists working in Riyadh to assess the following domains: personal characteristics of the dentists and their practices, provision of dental care for children who are visually‐impaired (VI) and/or hearing‐impaired (HI), and their attitude toward providing orthodontic care for these children. Attitudes were measured on two scales and the overall score of these two scales represented each respondent's attitude. Thirty percent of the dentists provided dental care for children with VI and 45.3 percent did for children with HI. The provision of orthodontic care was significantly affected by the country in which the dentists had received their dental training, both for children with VI and HI (p<0.01), and by number of years they had been in practice for children with VI (p<0.05). Regression analysis showed that only the country of dental training significantly affected the dentist's attitude score. There were also significant variations in attitudes toward the provision of orthodontic treatment for children with sensory impairment (SI), influenced by dental training and experience. In practical terms, this means that improvement in attitudes needs to be initiated at the dental undergraduate level. Establishing global guidelines for the provision of orthodontic treatment for patients with sensory impairment is likely to assist both professionals and patients.     

Patients with special health care needs in general and pediatric dental practices in Ontario

The objective of this study was to determine the involvement of Ontario's general and pediatric dentists in providing care to patients with special health care needs (PSHCNs). A questionnaire was developed and sent to a randomly selected sample of general dentists and to all pediatric dentists in Ontario; response rates were 52% and 90%, respectively. Most general dentists and all pediatric dentists reported that they provided a full range of dental services to PSHCNs. Most (80%) general dentists treat PSHCNs of all ages, whereas 60% of pediatric dentists report only treating PSHCNs up to the age of 18 years. A majority of both groups report treating PSHCNs whose dental care is paid through various government-funded programs. Most general dentists received training in the treatment of PSHCNs in undergraduate dental school, and 40% reported taking continuing education courses in this area. Most pediatric dentists received this training during their advanced dental specialty training, and 29% reported taking continuing education courses in this area. The results of this survey appear to demonstrate that general and pediatric dentists in Ontario provide a full range of dental services to PSHCNs, treat patients with a variety of disabilities and of all ages and are interested in pursuing continuing education that focuses on the delivery of dental care to PSHCNs. However, the results may be inaccurate because of question design flaws and responder bias among the 52% of surveyed general dentists who returned their questionnaires.