Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees

Purpose: Upper limb amputations cause severe functional disability and lower the patient's self body image, with severe psychological implications. Many parameters are involved in the successful rehabilitation of upper limb amputations. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are any parameters that might predict the successful prosthetic rehabilitation of upper limb amputees.

Method: The records of 45 patients who had undergone an upper limb amputation were traced. The patients were evaluated according to four parameters: (1) Modified upper extremities amputees' questionnaire; (2) Pain level according to Visual Analog Scale (VAS), range from 1 (lowest) up to 10 (highest); (3) Pain type - phantom or pain in the stump; (4) Functional assessment of prosthetic usage.

Results: Thirty (71.43%) of the patients reported difficulties with prosthesis usage. Twenty-three patients (54.76%) were satisfied with their prosthesis - 19 had cosmetic prosthesis and four had body-powered prosthesis.

Conclusion: No significant affect of the amputation level except for trans-wrist amputation with 100% prosthesis use. No significant difference was found between prosthesis type and the correlation to stump problems.

The above-elbow amputees, with dominant hand amputation, who used functional prosthesis (body-powered), achieved the best functional outcome and result.     

A comparison of upper limb amputees and patients with upper limb injuries using the Disability of the Arm,Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

Purpose:?To use the Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scale to measure the disability of patients with upper limb amputation(s) and to compare these to other upper limb injuries.

Method:?All 274 patients over the age of 18 years presenting to Prince Henry Hospital in Sydney over a 4-year time frame were given the DASH assessment tool and asked to complete it under supervision of the Occupational Therapist.

Results:?Patients with brachial plexus injuries, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and bilateral upper limb amputations demonstrated significantly higher levels of disability to patients with unilateral upper limb amputations. Partial hand amputees reported a higher level of disability than major unilateral upper limb amputees. For the 48 patients who completed pre- and post-treatment assessments, there was a significant improvement in their health status.

Conclusions:?Further research is required to understand the factors that affect a patient's perceptions of their disability. Perhaps the definitive nature of an amputation and the immediate involvement of highly skilled health professionals serve to assist patients to accept their injury and therefore minimizes the level of disability.     

A study of the physical rehabilitation and psychological state of patients who sustained limb loss as a result of terrorist activity in Northern Ireland 1969 – 2003

Objective.?To benchmark the psychological state and physical rehabilitation of patients who have sustained limb loss as a result of terrorist activity in Northern Ireland and to determine their satisfaction with the period of primary prosthetic rehabilitation and the artificial limb.

Method.?All patients who sustained limb loss as a result of the Troubles and were referred to our rehabilitation centre were sent a questionnaire. The main outcome measures were the SIGAM mobility grades, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ12) and three screening questions for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

Results.?Out of a 66% response rate, 52 (69%) patients felt that the period of primary prosthetic rehabilitation was adequate; 32 (54%) lower limb amputees graded themselves SIGAM C or D; 45 (60%) patients stated that they were still having significant stump pain. Significant stump pain was associated with poorer mobility. Nine (56%) upper limb amputees used their prosthetic limb in a functional way; 33 (44%) patients showed “psychiatric caseness” on the GHQ 12 and 50 (67%) had symptoms of PTSD.

Conclusions.?Most patients felt that the period of physical rehabilitation had been adequate; those who did not were more likely to be having ongoing psychological problems. A high percentage of patients continue to have psychological problems and stump pain.     

Residual limb osteomyelitis: A case series from a national prosthetic centre

Purpose. To examine the impact of residual limb osteomyelitis (RLO) on the rehabilitation of lower limb amputees.

Method. Retrospective review of the casenotes of patients with RLO. Information sought included details of amputation, clinical features of investigations for and management of RLO and its effect on rehabilitation.

Results. There were seven transfemoral and three transtibial amputees. Indications for amputation were vascular disease in nine cases, trauma in one. In each case, delayed wound healing or residual limb pain prompted radiological, hematological and microbiological investigations. Average time between amputation and diagnosis was 187 days. One patient died before treatment commenced. Two transtibial amputees were treated with intravenous antibiotics while rehabilitating using pylons. The remaining seven transfemoral amputees required surgical intervention and intravenous antibiotics. Five achieved independent ambulation following modification to or replacement of the originally cast prosthesis, averaging 408 days between amputation and commencement of rehabilitation. Two patients have not engaged in rehabilitation.

Conclusion. RLO delays rehabilitation and has significant financial implications, incurred by prolonged hospitalisation, radiological investigations and prosthetic modifications. RLO should be considered in any case of delayed wound healing or residual limb pain in amputees, as earlier diagnosis may reduce the time to commencement of rehabilitation and subsequent independent ambulation.     

Amputation rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration. From surgery to community reintegration

Purpose:?The purpose of this review is to summarize the literature related to the advances that have taken place in the management and rehabilitation care of limb amputation.

Results:?Prostheses for the lower and upper limb amputee have changed greatly over the past several years, with advances in components, socket fabrication and fitting techniques, suspension systems and sources of power and electronic controls. Higher levels of limb amputation can now be fitted with functional prostheses, which allow more patients to achieve independent life styles. This is of particular importance for the multi-limb amputee. The rehabilitation of more traditional lower limb levels of amputation have also greatly benefited from the technological advances including energy storing feet, electronic control hydraulic knees, ankle rotators and shock absorbers to mention a few. For the upper limb amputee, myoelectric and proportional controlled terminal devices and elbow joints are now used routinely in some rehabilitation facilities. Experimental prosthetic fitting techniques and devices such as the use of osseo-implantation for suspension of the prosthesis, tension control hands or electromagnetic fluids for knee movement control will also be briefly discussed in this paper.

Conclusion:?It is possible to conclude from this review that many advances have occurred that have greatly impacted the functional outcomes of patients with limb amputation.     

Management of the multiple limb amputee

Issue : Multiple limb amputations involving at least one upper extremity are very uncommon. The amputation of both an upper and lower limb is even more uncommon. Due to the rarity of these amputations therapists are uncertain regarding the most appropriate treatment methods. While the majority of the protocols used for single limb amputations are appropriate for these multiple limb amputees, there are differences. Loss of multiple limbs creates a problem of overheating for the individual. Loss of an arm and leg results in difficulty donning the prostheses and difficulty using crutches and parallel bars during mobilization. Method : A review is given of 16 multiple limb amputees seen in our rehabilitation centre in the last 15 years. Return to work was seen in one third and was not related to the number of the amputations. A higher proportion of these multiple limb amputations occur through alcoholism or attempted suicide behaviour than occurs with either single upper limb amputations or lower limb amputations. This existing behaviour can create a management problem for the rehabilitation team during rehabilitation. Conclusion : Guidelines as to appropriate prosthetic and preprosthetic care are provided to assist the practitioner who has the acute and long term care of these patients. All multiple limb amputees should be referred to a specialized rehabilitation centre to discuss prosthetic options and long term rehabilitation requirements. This paper does not discuss bilateral lower limb amputations when not combined with an upper limb amputation.     

Evaluation of rehabilitated bilateral lower limb amputees – an Indian study

Objective: This study assessed activities of daily living (ADL) and ambulation of rehabilitated bilateral lower limb amputees with relation to their level of amputation in an Indian setting. Subjects and Methods: This retrospective study of 25 subjects comprised 12 bilateral Trans-femoral (TF) amputees, 8 bilateral Trans-tibial (TT) amputees and 5 a combination of ipsilateral Trans-femoral and contralateral Trans-tibial amputation. All subjects were contacted by post/telephone, were physically examined and assessed at the Orthopaedic clinic at a mean follow-up of 6.6 years. Physical rehabilitation was evaluated using ADL score and by grading the level of ambulation. Results: ADL scores showed no significant difference according to level of amputation (p > 0.05), but the scores of prosthetic users were significantly higher than non-prosthetic users (p?=?0.002). Only 11/25 amputees became prosthetic ambulators and most (50%, 6/12) were TF amputees. All prosthetically rehabilitated subjects were mobilising with their prostheses at follow-up and graded as unlimited or limited community ambulators. Conclusion: Though it is well documented that the potential for successful rehabilitation is best for bilateral TT amputees, given the subjects’ economic constraints, higher prosthesis rehabilitation among bilateral TF amputees indicates that successful rehabilitation is possible in most subjects irrespective of the level of amputation.

Implications for Rehabilitation

• Rehabilitation of a bilateral lower limb amputee requires a team effort and constitutes a very difficult challenge for the subject.

• Low prosthesis ownership is largely due to subjects’ inability to afford a pair of prostheses in a developing country like India.

• Activities of daily living improve significantly with use of prostheses.

• Though it is well documented that the potential for successful rehabilitation is best for a bilateral TT amputee, higher prosthesis rehabilitation among bilateral TF subjects in this study indicates that successful rehabilitation is possible in most subjects irrespective of the level of amputation.

     

Management of the multiple limb amputee

Issue : Multiple limb amputations involving at least one upper extremity are very uncommon. The amputation of both an upper and lower limb is even more uncommon. Due to the rarity of these amputations therapists are uncertain regarding the most appropriate treatment methods. While the majority of the protocols used for single limb amputations are appropriate for these multiple limb amputees, there are differences. Loss of multiple limbs creates a problem of overheating for the individual. Loss of an arm and leg results in difficulty donning the prostheses and difficulty using crutches and parallel bars during mobilization.

Method : A review is given of 16 multiple limb amputees seen in our rehabilitation centre in the last 15 years. Return to work was seen in one third and was not related to the number of the amputations. A higher proportion of these multiple limb amputations occur through alcoholism or attempted suicide behaviour than occurs with either single upper limb amputations or lower limb amputations. This existing behaviour can create a management problem for the rehabilitation team during rehabilitation.

Conclusion : Guidelines as to appropriate prosthetic and preprosthetic care are provided to assist the practitioner who has the acute and long term care of these patients. All multiple limb amputees should be referred to a specialized rehabilitation centre to discuss prosthetic options and long term rehabilitation requirements. This paper does not discuss bilateral lower limb amputations when not combined with an upper limb amputation.     

Expectations of rehabilitation following lower limb amputation: a qualitative study

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the expectations of patients about to undergo prosthetic rehabilitation following a lower limb amputation. Method: Design: Qualitative study using semi structured interviews. Setting: Interviews were conducted at two district general hospitals. Participants: Eight patients who had undergone a major lower limb amputation due to vascular insufficiency were interviewed within two weeks of their amputation. All patients had been referred for prosthetic rehabilitation. Results: Five key themes emerged from the interviews: uncertainty, expectations in relation to the rehabilitation service, personal challenges, the prosthesis and returning to normality. These findings illustrate how participants faced uncertainty both pre- and postoperatively and often looked towards established amputees for the provision of accurate information. Conclusions: As no previous research has specifically explored patients’ expectations following an amputation, this study adds valuable insight into the patient experience. Patient expectations following lower limb amputation appeared to be vague and uninformed which may lead to uncertainty and passivity. It was found that patients did not know what to expect in relation to the rehabilitation process. They expected to return to a normal life following an amputation and this expectation appeared to be an important coping mechanism. Patient information and discussions should form an important part of the rehabilitation process before as well as during prosthetic rehabilitation, to help shape realistic expectations. This will allow patients to take a more active, informed role in the process. Psychoeducation interventions (talking) appears to be as important as “walking” within prosthetic rehabilitation services.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Patients’ expectations following lower limb amputation need to be informed by the rehabilitation team and established amputees from an early stage as part of the short- and long-term process of adjustment following amputation.

• Patient expectations of a return to normality appear to be an important part of coping following lower limb amputation, exploration of a new normal, both physically and psychosocially should be addressed as part of the rehabilitation process.

     

Acquired limb loss in patients with traumatic brain injury

The outcome associated with long-term prosthetic use was evaluated in 12 patients who had a dual disability of severe traumatic brain injury and an extremity amputation. The incidence and nature of complications after limb loss was also reviewed. The 12 patients sustained 15 extremity amputations. Lower extremity amputations were the most common disability. Fifty percent of the patients had at least one postoperative complication after amputation. All patients (100%) had at least one complication documented on rehabilitation admission. No patient was using a prosthesis at the time of rehabilitation admission. At discharge six patients were able to use a prosthesis. Only one patient was considered independent. Patient follow-up averaged 28.6 months. At long-term follow-up six patients were using a prosthesis. Four were considered independent. One-third of the total group was considered able to use the prosthesis independently in the community. Of the lower extremity amputated population, only 40% became ambulatory. This is considerably less than can be expected to become ambulatory if there was no amputation. All three upper extremity amputees did not use a prosthesis. All efforts should be directed at salvaging a limb threatened by amputation after survival of traumatic brain injury. Early transfer to a facility specializing in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation may decrease complications, reduce total hospitalization and improve overall functional ability.     

Cognitive functioning in persons with lower limb amputations: a review

Purpose: To review the literature on cognitive functioning in persons with lower limb amputations. Method: A search of the MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases was carried out. Results: Thirty papers were found that met the inclusion criteria. The studies were characterised by heterogeneity of design, methodological quality, sample characteristics, assessment of cognitive functioning, and outcomes examined. The research published to date suggests that cognitive impairment is more prevalent among persons with lower limb amputations than in the general population, and is linked with a number of important outcomes in this patient group, including mobility, prosthesis use, and maintenance of independence following amputation. Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of assessing the cognitive abilities of persons with lower limb amputations. An understanding of the cognitive profile of these patients could assist rehabilitation teams in determining their suitability for prosthetic or wheelchair rehabilitation, ascertaining appropriate and realistic goals for rehabilitation, and tailoring rehabilitation programmes to patients’ strengths so that maximal mobility and independence is achieved.

Implications for Rehabilitation

• Cognitive impairment appears to be more prevalent among persons with lower limb amputations than in the general population.

• Cognitive impairment is negatively associated with mobility, prosthesis use, and maintenance of independence following amputation.

• Cognitive screening prior to rehabilitation could assist in determining patients’ suitability for prosthetic or wheelchair use, ascertaining appropriate goals, and tailoring rehabilitation to patients’ strengths so as to optimise their mobility and independence.

     

The potential for non-invasive brain stimulation to improve function after amputation

Purpose: Lower limb amputee rehabilitation has traditionally focussed on restoration of gait and balance through use of prosthetic limbs and mobility aids. Despite these efforts, some amputees continue to experience difficulties with mastering prosthetic mobility. Emerging techniques in rehabilitation, such as non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), may be an appropriate tool to enhance prosthetic rehabilitation outcomes by promoting “normal” brain reorganisation and function. The purpose of this review is to highlight the potential of NIBS to improve functional outcomes for lower limb amputees. Methods: To demonstrate the rationale for applying NIBS to amputees, this study will first review literature regarding human motor control of gait, followed by neurophysiological reorganisation of the motor system after amputation and the relationship between brain reorganisation and gait function. We will conclude by reviewing literature demonstrating application of NIBS to lower limb muscle representations and evidence supportive of subsequent functional improvements. Results: Imaging, brain stimulation and behavioural evidence indicate that the cortex contributes to locomotion in humans. Following amputation both hemispheres reorganise with evidence suggesting brain reorganisation is related to functional outcomes in amputees. Previous studies indicate that brain stimulation techniques can be used to selectively promote neuroplasticity of lower limb cortical representations with improvements in function.

Conclusions: We suggest NIBS has the potential to transform lower limb amputee rehabilitation and should be further investigated.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Despite extensive rehabilitation some amputees continue to experience difficulty with prosthetic mobility

• Brain reorganisation following amputation has been related to functional outcomes and may be an appropriate target for novel interventions

• Non-invasive brain stimulation is a promising tool which has potential to improve functional outcomes for lower limb amputees

     

Adult acquired major upper limb amputation in Norway: prevalence,demographic features and amputation specific features. A population-based survey

Purpose.?To estimate the prevalence of adult acquired major upper limb amputation in Norway. To describe this amputee population regarding demographic features and amputation specific features. To compare our data to data collected internationally.

Method.?Population-based cross-sectional study on adult upper limb amputees with acquired limb loss through or proximal to the radio-carpal joint. Patients were found in the databases of the two companies in Norway that make upper limb prostheses and in the medical records of three of the largest Norwegian hospitals. Data were collected by postal questionnaires.

Results.?We estimated a population prevalence of 11.6 per 100,000 adults (n == 416). Our survey was not 100%% comprehensive and the estimate is conservative. The amputees were predominantly men with traumatic, unilateral, distal amputations at a young age. There were significant gender- and amputation level differences in cause. Most amputees had used prostheses. About four in ten were in paid employment.

Conclusions.?Our findings are mainly consistent with earlier studies from other countries. Implications of our findings related to the planning of future health care for these patients are outlined, including suggestion of regional multidisciplinary rehabilitation emphasising occupational rehabilitation and focus on preventive measures. Potential areas of follow-up are suggested.     

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the stump in below-knee amputees.

OBJECTIVE: To document the occurrence of reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the stump in two patients with below-knee amputation. DESIGN: A retrospective survey emphasising two clinical case reports. SETTING: Department of orthopaedic rehabilitation at a teaching rehabilitation hospital. PATIENTS: Lower limb amputees (n = 164) were accepted for prosthetic rehabilitation. Twenty-one amputees were regarded as rehabilitation failures; in two below-knee amputees intractable pain was the major problem. RESULTS: Clinical manifestations, radiological, and scintigraphic findings in the two amputees with intractable pain met the criteria for diagnosis of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the stump should be suspected in below-knee amputees whenever severe pain persists over a period of 3 to 4 months following amputation.     

Neurology (48)

Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study. (University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands) Pain 2000;87:33–41.
This study determined the prevalence and factors associated with phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees in The Netherlands. Additionally, the relationship between phantom pain, phantom sensations, and prosthesis use in upper limb amputees was investigated. One hundred twenty-four upper limb amputees participated in the study. Subjects were asked to fill out a self-developed questionnaire scoring the following items: date, side, level, and reason of amputation, duration of experienced pain before amputation, frequencies with which phantom sensations, phantom pain, and stump pain are experienced, amount of trouble and suffering experienced, respectively, related to these sensations, type of phantom sensations, medical treatment received for phantom pain and/or stump pain, and the effects of the treatment, self medication, and prosthesis use. The response rate was 80%. The prevalence of phantom pain was 51%, of phantom sensations 76%, and of stump pain 49%; 48% of the subjects experienced phantom pain a few times per day or more. Moderate to severe suffering from phantom pain was experienced by 64% of the respondents. A significant association was found between phantom pain and phantom sensations (relative risk 11.3) and between phantom pain and stump pain (relative risk 1.9). No other factors associated with phantom pain or phantom sensations could be determined. Only 4 patients received medical treatment for their phantom pain. Phantom pain is a common problem in upper limb amputees that causes considerable suffering for the subjects involved. Only a small number of subjects are treated for phantom pain. Conclude that further research is needed to determine factors associated with phantom pain.     

Return to work after lower limb amputation

Purpose. To review the literature on return to work after lower limb amputation.

Method. A comprehensive review of literature on return to work after lower limb amputation was carried out, searching MEDLINE and PubMED.

Results. Most authors found return-to-work rate to be about 66%. Between 22 and 67% of the subjects retained the same occupation, while the remainder had to change occupation. Post-amputation jobs were generally more complex with a requirement for a higher level of general educational development and were physically less demanding. The return to work depends on: general factors, such as age, gender and educational level; factors related to impairments and disabilities due to amputation (amputation level, multiple amputations, comorbidity, reason for amputation, persistent stump problems, the time from the injury to obtaining a permanent prosthesis, wearing comfort of the prosthesis, walking distance and restrictions in mobility); and factors related to work and policies (salary, higher job involvement, good support from the implementing body and the employer and social support network).

Conclusions. Subjects have problems returning to work after lower limb amputation. Many have to change their work and/or work only part-time. Vocational rehabilitation and counselling should become a part of rehabilitation programme for all subjects who are of working age after lower limb amputation. Better cooperation between professionals, such as rehabilitation team members, implementing bodies, company doctors and the employers, is necessary.     

Prosthetic use in patients with burns and associated limb amputations

A review of 11 patients who sustained burns that were complicated by limb amputation was completed to determine their eventual ability to use prosthesis. Amputations included six below-elbow, four above-elbow, three below-knee, and three above-knee amputations. Ten of the 11 patients (91%) had open wounds on the stump limbs and nine patients (82%) required skin grafting procedures on the amputated limbs. Delays in prosthetic fitting because of continued surgeries, open wounds, skin grafts on the stump limb, and breakdown of the stump were identified. However, eight of these patients (73%) were eventually able to wear prosthetic devices. Fisher's exact test was used to test the influence of the number and site of the amputations and skin grafting on the stump on successful prosthesis use. None of these tested items were found to be significant. The results demonstrate that most patients with burns who require limb amputation can achieve successful prosthesis use.