Pain, coping, emotional state and physical function in patients with chronic radicular neck pain. A comparison between patients treated with surgery, physiotherapy or neck collar--a blinded, prospective randomized study

Purpose: To describe and explore the relationships between pain, emotional state and coping strategies in patients with chronic radicular neck pain before and after surgery or conservative treatments. Methods: We randomize 81 conseutive patients with cervical radicular pain and nerve root compression, verified by MRI, to either surgical decompression with fusion or physiotherapy or neck collar. Emotional state was both measured with Mood Adjective Check List, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and with a Coping Strategies Questionnaire. Pain was measured with VAS and function with Disability Index Rating. Measurements were made before treatment, and follow ups after 3 and 12 months post treatment. Results: We found generally a low emotional state with anxiety, depression and sleep-disturbances not only connected to pain. Pain improved faster in the surgery group but after one year no differences were seen. Surgery and physiotherapy improved function with heavy work compared to collar after 3 months. Many patients used active coping before treatment, but after treatment more passive coping strategies were found. Conclusion: We recommend a multidisciplinary rehabilitation with cognitive behavioural therapy and psychological interventions.     

A prospective study of patients with chronic back pain randomised to group exercise, physiotherapy or osteopathy

Objective

To investigate the difference in outcome between patients treated with group exercise, physiotherapy or osteopathy.

Design

Prospective study of patients referred at random to one of three treatments, with follow-up 6 weeks after discharge and after 12 months.

Setting

National Health Service physiotherapy department at St Albans City Hospital, part of the West Hertfordshire Musculoskeletal Therapy Service.

Participants

Two hundred and thirty-nine patients aged 18-65 years recruited from referrals to the physiotherapy department with chronic low back pain.

Interventions

Eligible patients were randomised to group exercises led by a physiotherapist, one-to-one predominantly manipulative physiotherapy, or osteopathy.

Main outcomes

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol-5D, shuttle walking test and patients’ subjective responses to pain and treatment.

Results

All three treatments indicated comparable reductions in mean (95% confidence intervals) ODI at 6-week follow-up: group exercise, −4.5 (−0.9 to −8.0); physiotherapy, −4.1 (−1.4 to −6.9); and osteopathy, −5.0 (−1.6 to −8.4). Attendance rates were significantly lower among the group exercise patients. One-to-one therapies provided evidence of greater patient satisfaction.

Conclusion

The study supports the use of a variety of approaches for the treatment of chronic low back pain. Particular attention needs to be given to the problems of attracting enough participants for group sessions, as these can be difficult to schedule in ways that are convenient for different participants.     

Adding Temporomandibular joint treatments to routine physiotherapy for patients with non-specific chronic neck pain: A randomized clinical study

IntroductionNeck Pain can be related to the disorders of other adjacent areas such as the Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ). This study aimed to investigate whether there is value in adding TMJ treatments to routine physiotherapy in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain compared with a control group.MethodsA randomized, single-blind, clinical study desined including two groups of patients. Group A (20 people) received routine physiotherapy for neck pain and group B (20 people) received TMJ manual therapy plus exercise therapy in addition to routine physiotherapy for neck pain. The Treatment program included six sessions for two days a week over a period of 21 days. Assessments were performed during the first session, in the last session and one month after treatment as a follow-up. Outcome measures included neck range of motion (ROM), neck disability index (NDI) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Before starting the study, the reliability of methods for measuring neck ROM was evaluated.ResultsParticipants were 21 women and 19 men. Initially, a pilot study was carried out on the 40 volunteers to assess the reliability of the measurement methods, and the results were acceptable. With both the control group and the intervention group, the indexes showed significant improvement (p < 0.001), although the intervention group showed more improvement (p < 0.001).ConclusionThis result means adding treatments of TMJ to routine neck physiotherapy can magnify the effect of the intervention, a significant change still in evidence at follow up. Moreover, given the clinically important differences, our results for VAS and NDI were acceptable.     

Effectiveness of standard cervical physiotherapy plus diaphragm manual therapy on pain in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundLiterature concerning the effect of diaphragm treatment to reduce neck pain symptoms is scarce. Aim of this trial was to investigate the effects of diaphragm manual therapy associated with standard physiotherapy treatment on pain in patients with Chronic Neck Pain (CNP).MethodsIn a private practice clinic, subjects with CNP were randomly assigned to receive three 30-min treatment sessions of standard cervical physiotherapy and Diaphragm Manual Therapy (DMT) or Sham Diaphragm Technique (SDT). Participants and assessors were blinded to the assignment. Primary outcome was pain, secondary outcomes were cervical active range of motion, pain pressure threshold, disability and quality of life measured at baseline, before and after each session, at 3 and 6-months. Adverse events were monitored. A non-parametric multivariate approach (combined permutation test) was applied to assess the effect of the treatment on all the outcomes. An intention to treat analysis was performed.ResultsForty patients were randomly allocated to DMT and SDT groups. Combined permutation test showed a significant higher improvement in DMT group compared to SDT group (p-value = 0.0002). The between-group comparisons on single outcomes showed a statistically significant improvement only for pain pressure threshold on upper trapezius (adjusted p-value = 0.029). No adverse events related to the intervention were registered.ConclusionsIn patients with CNP, addition of diaphragm manual techniques to standard cervical treatment seems to give a better global outcome, but this improvement is of unclear clinical relevance; the primary outcome seems not to have a role. Further studies are needed to confirm and clarify these results.Trial registrationRelease Date: July 18, 2017 Registered in ClinicalTrial.gov database ID: NCT03223285A.     

Correlation among physical impairments, pain, disability, and patient satisfaction in patients with chronic neck pain

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlations among pain, physical impairments, disability, and patient satisfaction in patients with chronic neck pain. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study with 6-month follow-up. SETTING: Institutional practice. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects (N=218) with chronic neck pain. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were treated with different physiotherapy modalities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were obtained for self-reported disability, verbal numeric pain scale, patient satisfaction, and 2 measures of physical impairments during the initial visit, at 6 weeks, and finally at 6 months. RESULTS: The correlation among 4 sets of measurements varied. Moderate correlation was noted between disability and patient satisfaction ( r range, .50-.65), and between disability and pain ( r range, .55-.63). A fair relationship was found between pain and patient satisfaction ( r range, .43-.48), but only weak relationships were found between physical impairments and pain ( r range, -.08 to -.25). The correlations tended to increase in the follow-up assessments. CONCLUSIONS: No strong correlations were found among disability, patient satisfaction, pain, and physical impairments although the correlations tended to increase in the follow-up assessments. The findings support the suggestion that clinicians should address as many relevant aspects of a presenting clinical entity as possible in the management of chronic neck pain.     

The association between cognitive factors,pain and disability in patients with idiopathic chronic neck pain

Purpose.?The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between known cognitive factors and levels of pain and disability in patients with idiopathic chronic neck pain.

Method.?Ninety-four patients referred for physiotherapy because of chronic neck pain completed measures of pain, disability, catastrophising, pain-related fear, pain vigilance and awareness and self-efficacy beliefs. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were then performed to establish whether the cognitive factors were significant determinants of levels of pain and disability.

Results.?The cognitive measures were significantly related to levels of pain and disability, explaining 23% of the variance in pain intensity and 30% of the variance in disability. Specifically, greater catastrophising (β?=?0.37, p?<?0.05) and lower pain vigilance and awareness (β?=???0.32, p?<?0.05) were associated with greater pain intensity. Moreover, greater catastrophising (β?=?0.26, p?<?0.05) and lower functional self-efficacy beliefs (β?=???0.34, p?<?0.001) were significantly associated with greater levels of disability.

Conclusions.?Cognitive factors were strongly related to levels of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain. In view of this, targeting the modification of these cognitive factors should be an integral part of therapy when treating patients with idiopathic chronic neck pain.     

The processes underpinning reductions in disability among people with chronic neck pain. A preliminary comparison between two distinct types of physiotherapy intervention

Purpose: To establish whether different processes underpin changes in disability in people with neck pain who underwent two types of active physiotherapy intervention.

Materials and methods: This study was a sub-analysis of a randomized controlled trial assessing whether the addition of Interactive Behavioral Modification Therapy (a cognitively informed physiotherapy treatment) to a Progressive Neck Exercise Program improved outcome in patients with chronic neck pain. Regression analyses were performed to determine the extent to which demographics, changes in pain, and changes in certain cognitive factors were related to changes in disability.

Results: In the progressive neck exercise group, changes in levels of pain intensity were the only factor significantly related to change in disability, explaining 33% of the variance. In the interactive behavioral modification therapy group, changes in pain intensity, and catastrophizing together explained 54% of the variance in change in disability. Only changes in catastrophizing displayed a significant β value in the final model.

Conclusions: Different processes appear to underpin changes in disability in patients undergoing cognitively informed physiotherapy to those undergoing a primarily exercise-based approach.

• Implications for rehabilitation

• Certain cognitive factors are known to be related to levels of disability in patients with chronic neck pain

• Specifically targeting these factors results in more patients making a clinically meaningful reduction in disability

• Different processes appear to underpin reductions in disability when people with neck pain are treated with cognitively informed physiotherapy to when treated with exercise alone, which may account for why more patients improve when treated in this manner.

• Reductions in catastrophizing appear to be particularly important and efforts should be made to assess and treat catastrophic thoughts in people with chronic neck pain.

     

Nurse practitioners can effectively deliver pain coping skills training to osteoarthritis patients with chronic pain: A randomized,controlled trial

A multisite, randomized, controlled clinical effectiveness trial was conducted for osteoarthritis patients with chronic pain of the knee or hip. Adult health nurse practitioners provided a 10-session intervention, pain coping skills training (PCST), in patients’ doctors’ offices (N = 129 patients); the control group received usual care (N = 127 patients). Primary outcomes assessed at baseline, posttreatment, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up were: pain intensity, physical functioning, psychological distress, self-efficacy, catastrophizing, use of coping strategies, and quality of life. Secondary measures included fatigue, social functioning, health satisfaction, and use of pain medication. Methods favoring external validity, consistent with pragmatic, effectiveness research, were utilized. Primary ITT and secondary per-protocol analyses were conducted. Attrition was within the expected range: 11% at posttreatment and 29% at 12-month follow-up; rates did not differ between groups. Omnibus ITT analyses across all assessment points indicated significant improvement for the PCST group compared with the control group for pain intensity, physical functioning, psychological distress, use of pain coping strategies, and self-efficacy, as well as fatigue, satisfaction with health, and reduced use of pain medication. Treatment effects were robust to covariates (demographics and clinical sites). Trends in the outcomes across the assessments were examined. All outcomes, except for self-efficacy, were maintained through the 12-month follow-up; effects for self-efficacy degraded over time. Per-protocol analyses did not yield greater effect sizes. Comparisons of PCST patients who were more vs less treatment adherent suggested greater effectiveness for patients with high adherence. Results support the effectiveness of nurse practitioner delivery of PCST for chronic osteoarthritis pain.     

The short-term effects of balneotherapy on pain,disability and fatigue in patients with chronic low back pain treated with physical therapy: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare whether there are positive effects of balneotherapy(BT) on pain, quality of life and disability of individuals receiving physical therapy(PT) for chronic low back pain and to examine the effect of body mass index(BMI) on treatment.Materials and methodThis prospective, controlled, single blind study was conducted. Patients were randomized into two groups through a simple randomization in a 1:1 ratio. The clinician and biostatistics expert were blinded. PT group was applied PT, BT + PT group was applied PT + BT. All patients were included in the study for 3 weeks (total of 15 sessions, 5 days per week). All patients applied hot pack, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and ultrasound. Patients in the BT + PT group applied BT in thermo mineralized water pool (20 min at 38−40 °C). Assessments were made using Pain-Visual Analog Scale(VAS), EQ-5D-3 L Scale(EQ5), EQ-VAS, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue(FACIT-F), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire(RMDQ) and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale(QBPDS) at the beginning (W0) and end (W3) of treatment. While performing statistical analysis, patients were divided into 3 categories of BMI1(18.5–24.9 kg/m²), BMI2 (25.0–29.9 kg/m²) and BMI3(≥30.0 kg/m²).Results270 patients were randomized. 129 patients in PT group and 133 patients in PT + BT group completed the study. In the BT + PT group, there were increases in the EQ5 and EQ-VAS variables and decreases in all other variables compared to the PT group which were found to be statistically significant (for QBPDS p < 0.05, the others p < 0.01). The differences in all variables W0 and W3 were at least half reductions and increases which were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.01). In terms of BMI, there were significant differences for all groups, especially BMI3 had higher means for all variables apart from EQ5 and EQ-VAS than the other two categories. BMI1 was the BMI category with highest means for EQ5 and EQ-VAS. The Group × Time interaction was found to be statistically significant for Pain-VAS, EQ5, EQ-VAS, FACIT-F, QBPDS and RMDQ(p < 0.01). For Pain-VAS, the effect of the Group × Time × BMI interaction was found to be statistically significant(p < 0.05).ConclusionBT plus PT was more effective than PT. BT may have positive contributions to reducing pain, functionality of patients, quality of life, fatigue and disability status.     

Assessment of the effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation measures in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

Chronic low-back pain is a frequent symptom causing considerable socioeconomic costs in many countries. Outpatient treatment of low-back pain often remains unsatisfactory. In our prospective study, one hundred patients on the five months waiting list were allocated randomly to attending the hospital either four months or six months later, the latter serving as a control group for those undergoing treatment. Health status was assessed using a multidimensional questionnaire, which had proven a reliable, valid and sensitive instrument in former studies. After four to six weeks of multidisciplinary inpatient treatment, a significant decrease in pain, anxiety and depression was found, whereas no improvement was observed in the control group. Multidisciplinary inpatient treatment therefore at least has short-term positive effects on patients' health status.     

A prospective, randomized comparison of the metabolic effects of pioglitazone or rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes who were previously treated with troglitazone

OBJECTIVE: To characterize potential differences in glycemic control, plasma lipid level, and weight in a cohort of patients previously treated with troglitazone (TROG) who were switched to either pioglitazone or rosiglitazone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: After a 2-week washout from TROG, 186 patients were randomly assigned to receive either pioglitazone (PIO) or rosiglitazone (ROSI). Weight, HbA(1c), and fasting lipid profile were documented before discontinuing TROG and at 4 months after starting either pioglitazone or rosiglitazone. Secondarily, the effect of concurrent medications on study outcomes was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients completed follow-up: 67 individuals in the PIO group (32 women, 35 men) and 60 individuals in the ROSI group (33 women, 27 men). There were no significant differences in gender mix, age, weight, fasting lipid profile, or HbA(1c) between the ROSI and PIO groups. After 4 months of randomized treatment, no change in HbA(1c) from baseline between or within groups was noted. Both groups experienced an equal and significant increase in weight from baseline of approximately 2.0 kg. Thiazolidinedione and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy had significant and independent effects on lipid profile (P < 0.005). Significant improvements in lipid profile were noted in the PIO group (P < 0.01), whereas none were detected with conversion to ROSI. Specifically, the PIO group experienced an average decrease in total cholesterol of approximately 20 mg/dl. CONCLUSIONS: Differing effects on lipid profile were apparent after random conversion from TROG to either PIO or ROSI, despite similar weight increase and glycemic control. The clinical significance of these differences remains to be determined, and further comparative research is warranted.     

Relationships between coping, coping resources and quality of life in patients with chronic illness: a pilot study

Scand J Caring Sci; 2011; 25; 476–483
Relationships between coping, coping resources and quality of life in patients with chronic illness: a pilot study Background: In Sweden there are approximately about 3500 end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) and 250 000 chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. Objectives: The original purpose of the study was to determine differences between two groups of patients with chronic illness (ESRD and CHF) regarding the following study variables: coping, sense of coherence (SOC), self‐efficacy and quality of life (QOL). Following this, the aim was to explore the relationships between demographic variables (sex, age, educational level and living area) and QOL as well as between coping, SOC, self‐efficacy and QOL for the combined sample of patients with ESRD and CHF. Methods: A comparative and correlative design was used with a sample of 100 patients (n = 41 ESRD, n = 59 CHF). The data were collected during 2004, using four standardized questionnaires and regression analyses were conducted. Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups. Positive correlations were identified between SOC, general self‐efficacy and QOL, whereas negative correlations emerge between emotion‐focused coping, SOC, general self‐efficacy and QOL. SOC, general self‐efficacy and emotion‐focused coping explained 40% of the variance in QOL. Those with low SOC and general self‐efficacy showed negative correlations between emotion‐focused coping and QOL, whereas no such correlations were shown for those with high values on SOC and general self‐efficacy. Conclusions: The present results on coping and QOL correspond with previous research regarding how other groups with chronic illness handled their daily life. Preliminary results indicate that how individuals tackle their present situation is more important than which chronic illness they have. Women used more emotion‐focused coping than men, which constitute an important finding for further research.     

Lumbar instrumented fusion compared with cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic back pain after previous surgery for disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled study

The effectiveness of lumbar fusion for chronic low back pain after surgery for disc herniation has not been evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of lumbar fusion with posterior transpedicular screws and cognitive intervention and exercises. Sixty patients aged 25-60 years with low back pain lasting longer than 1 year after previous surgery for disc herniation were randomly allocated to the two treatment groups. Experienced back surgeons performed transpedicular fusion. Cognitive intervention consisted of a lecture intended to give the patient an understanding that ordinary physical activity would not harm the disc and a recommendation to use the back and bend it. This was reinforced by three daily physical exercise sessions for 3 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Outcome data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Ninety-seven percent of the patients, including seven of eight patients who had either not attended treatment (n=5) or changed groups (n=2), completed 1-year follow-up. ODI was significantly improved from 47 to 38 after fusion and from 45 to 32 after cognitive intervention and exercises. The mean difference between treatments after adjustment for gender was -7.3 (95% CI -17.3 to 2.7, p=0.15). The success rate was 50% in the fusion group and 48% in the cognitive intervention/exercise group. For patients with chronic low back pain after previous surgery for disc herniation, lumbar fusion failed to show any benefit over cognitive intervention and exercises.     

Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by the general practitioner for patients with neck pain: long-term results from a pragmatic randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: The authors' goals were to compare the effectiveness of manual therapy (MT; mainly spinal mobilization), physical therapy (PT; mainly exercise therapy), and continued care by the general practitioner (GP; analgesics, counseling and education) over a period of 1 year. METHODS: One hundred eighty-three patients suffering for at least 2 weeks from nonspecific neck pain were randomized to receive a 6-week treatment strategy of MT once a week, PT twice a week, or GP care once every 2 weeks. The primary outcome measures were perceived recovery, severity of physical dysfunctioning, pain intensity, and functional disability. RESULTS: The differences between groups considered over 1 year were statistically significant (repeated measurements analyses P<0.001 to P=0.02) for all outcomes but borderline for the Neck Disability Index (P=0.06). Higher improvement scores were observed for MT for all outcomes, followed by PT and GP care. The success rate, based on perceived recovery after 13 weeks, was 72% for MT, which was significantly higher than the success rate for continued GP care (42%, P=0.001) but not significantly higher compared with PT treatment (59%, P=0.16). The difference between PT and GP approached statistical significance (P=0.06). After 1 year the success rates were 75%, 63%, and 56%, respectively, and no longer significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term results (at 7 weeks) have shown that MT speeded recovery compared with GP care and, to a lesser extent, also compared with PT. In the long-term, GP treatment and PT caught up with MT, and differences between the three treatment groups decreased and lost statistical significance at the 13-week and 52-week follow-up.