Are localized low back pain and generalized back pain similar entities? Results of a longitudinal community based study

Purpose. To compare subjects with localized low back pain (LBP) and with generalized back pain (BP) with regard to baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes.

Methods. A community-based longitudinal study. All inhabitants aged 22 - 70 of a single town were asked to complete self-administered questionnaires regarding back and neck pain and lifestyle characteristics. Those reporting LBP during the previous month were followed up after one year. Data were stratified by sites of pain with respect to 'localized LBP' and to 'LBP with additional sites of BP'. Among LBP measures were the Roland and Morris Disability scale and Pain symptoms indices.

Results. Nearly 30% of the total population (602) experienced LBP during the previous month, of whom more than half (336) reported 'localized LBP' and the rest LBP + neck and or upper back pain (Generalized BP). Both subgroups differed from those free of BP, however, those reported 'Generalized BP' comprised more females, were less educated, smoked more, were less engaged in sporting activities and reported higher level of LBP measures than those reported 'localized LBP'. After one year, both subgroups were similar with regard to lifestyle but remained different with regard to some of the LBP measures.

Conclusions. Subjects with 'localized LBP' presented healthier lifestyle than subjects with 'Generalized BP'. The latter experienced higher degree of pain measures. It seems that 'Generalized BP' is not a different entity than 'localized LBP' but rather a more severe one.     

Graded back pain revisited – Do latent variable models change our understanding of severe back pain in the general population?

Back pain severity has extensively been targeted in clinical and epidemiologic studies. However, despite the importance of a valid pain severity grading its adequate conceptualization in the general population has received comparatively little attention. The potentially misleading influence of measurement error remains unclear. Latent variable models allow for a versatile assessment of disease severity and will be applied to propose a model-based grading of back pain. This cross-sectional postal survey was carried out in Germany between 2003 and 2004 to address back pain severity in the general adult population. 8756 subjects, aged 18–75 years, provided data on measures of pain intensity and disability. Latent class analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to assess and compare categorical and dimensional representations of back pain severity. The results show that beyond differences in their location on a severity continuum, the subjects did not report markedly different pain intensity/disability profiles. Our analyses disconfirmed the presence of a sizeable high pain intensity, low disability subgroup. A comparison of the different latent variable models yielded a usable classification into five severity subtypes. This classification showed statistically significant and clinically important associations to health-related variables. Our results confirm the high burden of back pain in the general population but suggest a different categorization of those with severe back pain. This entails consequences on how to best target this important health problem from a public health perspective.     

Introduction of family rehabilitation training of low back pain

Background：Lowbackpainisacommonandfrequentdisease，oftenwithsevereischialgianeuralgia．Besidesnormalambulatorytreatmentssuchastractionoflumbarvertebra，computermiddlefre－quentandmassage，trainingoflumbodorsalmyodynamiaoffamilyauxiliarytreatmentisveryessential．Placingasupplementaryinstru－mentmadebyourselvesbelowlowback，lyingseveralhours，makinglumbarvertebralslideforwardandresumethenormalbiomechanicsrelationsoflumbarvertebrabystrentheningphysiologicallordo－sis．Improvethepathologicchangeo…     

How effective is the acute low back pain screening questionnaire for predicting 1-year follow-up in patients with low back pain?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate potential associations between the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire (ALBPSQ), a biopsychosocial screening instrument for identifying patients at risk of chronicity, and relevant variables at 1-year follow-up in a cohort of patients with low back pain. STUDY DESIGN: A 1-year prospective study was conducted in which patients who had previously received treatment in the Northern Ireland National Health Service (n = 118) were requested to complete a follow-up questionnaire package of pain and functional disability measures and a patient-centered questionnaire of seven variables considered relevant from the patient's perspective. PATIENTS: Ninety patients (76% response rate) returned the completed questionnaire package. RESULTS: The ALBPSQ total score and cutoff score of 112 were significantly positively associated with the pain and functional disability questionnaire scores at follow-up but did not significantly discriminate for difference scores on these measures. Although six of the seven patient-centered variables were significantly associated with the screening questionnaire total score, the cutoff score was strongly predictive of only one variable (work loss) and failed to demonstrate high levels of sensitivity for other variables (i.e., medication use, additional treatment, poor exercise participation). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study demonstrate that scores on the ALBPSQ were positively correlated with patients' levels of pain and functional disability at 1-year follow-up and correctly classified all patients reporting some degree of work loss but had minimal predictive strength for the other patient-centered variables evaluated.     

Complementary and alternative medicine treatments for low back pain

Complementary and alternative medicine, often referred to as integrated medicine, is often used for the treatment of low back pain. This article presents 6 therapies (ie, behavioral treatment, acupuncture, manipulation, prolotherapy, neuroreflexotherapy, and herbal treatments), which are discussed in terms of the specifics of the modality, as well as the empirical evidence related to their effectiveness.     

Exercise and chronic low back pain: what works?

The aim of this review was to investigate current evidence for the type and quality of exercise being offered to chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients, within randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and to assess how treatment outcomes are being measured. A two-fold methodological approach was adopted: a methodological assessment identified RCTs of 'medium' or 'high' methodological quality. Exercise quality was subsequently assessed according to the predominant exercise used. Outcome measures were analysed based on current recommendations. Fifty-four relevant RCTs were identified, of which 51 were scored for methodological quality. Sixteen RCTs involving 1730 patients qualified for inclusion in this review based upon their methodological quality, and chronicity of symptoms; exercise had a positive effect in all 16 trials. Twelve out of 16 programmes incorporated strengthening exercise, of which 10 maintained their positive results at follow-up. Supervision and adequate compliance were common aspects of trials. A wide variety of outcome measures were used. Outcome measures did not adequately represent the guidelines for impairment, activity and participation, and impairment measures were over-represented at the expense of others. Despite the variety offered, exercise has a positive effect on CLBP patients, and results are largely maintained at follow-up. Strengthening is a common component of exercise programmes, however, the role of exercise co-interventions must not be overlooked. More high quality trials are needed to accurately assess the role of supervision and follow-up, together with the use of more appropriate outcome measures.     

Can standing back extension exercise improve or prevent low back pain in Japanese care workers?

BackgroundWe suggested a standing back extension exercise ‘One Stretch’ based on the McKenzie method, to examine the ability to improve or prevent low back pain (LBP) in Japanese care workers.MethodsWe conducted a single-center, non-randomized, controlled study in Japan. Care workers in an intervention group received an exercise manual and a 30-minute seminar on LBP and were encouraged with a group approach, while care workers in a control group were given only the manual. All care workers answered questionnaires at the baseline and end of a 1-year study period. The subjective improvement of LBP and compliance with the exercise were evaluated.ResultsIn all, 64 workers in the intervention group and 72 in the control group participated in this study. More care workers in the intervention group exercised regularly and improved or prevented LBP than in the control group (P = 0·003 and P<0·0001, respectively). In the intervention group, none had a first medical consultation or were absent from disability for LBP by the end of the study period.ConclusionThe exercise ‘One Stretch’ would be effective to improve or prevent LBP in care workers. Our group approach would lead to better compliance with the exercise.     

Does anterior trunk pain predict a different course of recovery in chronic low back pain?

Patient characteristics associated with the course and severity of low back pain (LBP) and disability have been the focus of extensive research, however, known characteristics do not explain much of the variance in outcomes. The relationship between anterior trunk pain (ATP) and LBP has not been explored, though mechanisms for visceral referred pain have been described. Study objectives were: (1) determine prevalence of ATP in chronic LBP patients, (2) determine whether ATP is associated with increased pain and disability in these patients, and (3) evaluate whether ATP predicts the course of pain and disability in these patients. In this study, spinal outpatient department patients mapped the distribution of their pain and patients describing pain in their chest, abdomen or groin were classified with ATP. Generalized estimating equations were performed to investigate the relationship between ATP and LBP outcomes. A total of 2974 patients were included and 19.6% of patients reported ATP. At all time points, there were significant differences in absolute pain intensity and disability in those with ATP compared with those without. The presence of ATP did not affect the clinical course of LBP outcomes.     

Are the changes in postural control associated with low back pain caused by pain interference?

BACKGROUND: Voluntary limb movements are associated with involuntary and automatic postural adjustments of the trunk muscles. These postural adjustments occur prior to movement and prevent unwanted perturbation of the trunk. In low back pain, postural adjustments of the trunk muscles are altered such that the deep trunk muscles are consistently delayed and the superficial trunk muscles are sometimes augmented. This alteration of postural adjustments may reflect disruption of normal postural control imparted by reduced central nervous system resources available during pain, so-called "pain interference," or reflect adoption of an alternate postural adjustment strategy. METHODS: We aimed to clarify this by recording electromyographic activity of the upper (obliquus externus) and lower (transversus abdominis/obliquus internus) abdominal muscles during voluntary arm movements that were coupled with painful cutaneous stimulation at the low back. If the effect of pain on postural adjustments is caused by pain interference, it should be greatest at the onset of the stimulus, should habituate with repeated exposure, and be absent immediately when the threat of pain is removed. Sixteen patients performed 30 forward movements of the right arm in response to a visual cue (control). Seventy trials were then conducted in which arm movement was coupled with pain ("pain trials") and then a further 70 trials were conducted without the pain stimulus ("no pain trials"). RESULTS: There was a gradual and increasing delay of transversus abdominis/obliquus internus electromyograph and augmentation of obliquus externus during the pain trials, both of which gradually returned to control values during the no pain trials. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that altered postural adjustments of the trunk muscles during pain are not caused by pain interference but are likely to reflect development and adoption of an alternate postural adjustment strategy, which may serve to limit the amplitude and velocity of trunk excursion caused by arm movement.     

Health care providers communicate less well with patients with chronic low back pain – A study of encounters at a back pain clinic in Denmark

We aimed to study the quality of communication between health care providers and patients with low back pain with emphasis on information giving in a back pain clinic, including if characteristics of patients could be associated with communication quality. We videotaped 79 encounters in which 21 providers informed patients about the results of magnetic resonance imaging of the back. Background information about the patients was collected by questionnaires and interview after the encounter. Videotapes were analysed with the Four Habits Coding Scheme (4HCS) in which higher scores mean better communication. There were strong negative correlations between 4HCS scores and the duration of back pain, and patient age. The results were significant for all professional subgroups (doctors, physiotherapists, chiropractors). Communication quality in encounters with back pain patients is worse, the longer the patient has suffered pain. Poor communication quality also seems to be associated with patients being older.     

Reduction in pain intensity after treatment for chronic back pain. When is it clinically meaningful?

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate how much change in pain intensity is necessary to discriminate between good, bad or no treatment outcome from the patient's point of view after therapy for chronic back pain. METHODS: A total of 153 patients with chronic back pain were admitted to a 3 week multimodal treatment program including functional restoration and cognitive behavioral support (outpatient). Pain intensity was measured at the beginning of treatment and 6 months after discharge using a visual analogue scale (VAS). At this time, patients had to evaluate their back pain compared to the beginning of treatment as of better, equal or worse (global self-assessment). RESULTS: Six months after therapy, 48% of the patients assessed their back pain as better, 28% reported no change and 14% stated that their pain was worse. Mean pain reduction among the patients who assessed themselves as better was 25 points, while those who stated that their pain was worse had an average of 9 points more (VAS). CONCLUSION: Patients' global self-assessment is a valid parameter to determine the outcome after treatment of chronic back pain. A clinically meaningful pain reduction can be assumed if there is at least a 25/100 point reduction (VAS), while a worsening of pain is already found to be important when there is a rise of 9/100 points.     

How common is back pain in women with gastrointestinal problems?

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationship between back pain and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in a large scale population study with consideration of possible confounding factors. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of survey data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health was conducted using multinomial logistic regression to model 4 frequencies of back pain in relation to number of GI symptoms (including constipation, hemorrhoids, and other bowel problems). A total of 38,050 women from 3 age cohorts were included in analysis. RESULTS: After adjustment for confounding factors, the number of GI symptoms was significantly associated with back pain among all age cohorts. Odds ratios for experiencing back pain "rarely," "sometimes," and "often" increased with the number of GI symptoms. Young, mid-age, and older women who experience 2 or 3 GI symptoms had adjusted odds ratios of 3.3 (2.5 to 4.4), 3.0 (2.5 to 3.7) and 2.8 (2.3 to 3.4), respectively, for "often" having back pain. DISCUSSION: This study has identified a strong association between back pain and GI symptoms in women. Possible factors that may account for this relationship include referred pain through viscerosomatic convergence, altered pain perception, increased spinal loading when straining during defecation, or reduced support of the abdominal contents and spine secondary to changes in function of the abdominal muscles.