Predicting goal achievement during stroke rehabilitation for Medicare beneficiaries

Abstract

Purpose: Few studies have investigated the ability of treatment teams to predict functional improvement and whether an association between predicted goals and discharge function in patients with stroke exists. This study investigated goal prediction during stroke rehabilitation delivered in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) and the factors associated with goal prediction. Methods: A serial, cross-sectional design analyzing the Medicare IRF Patient Assessment Instrument dataset. The sample included 179?479 admissions for stroke aged over 65 years in 968 IRFs. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) controlled for facility cluster effects were used for analysis of time trends for length of stay (LOS), predicted Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, discharge FIM scores and predicted-discharge difference FIM scores (goal FIM scores minus discharge FIM scores). GEE models were employed to determine the correlation between predicted FIM and discharge FIM scores and factors associated with goal achievement. Results: Mean LOS, predicted FIM scores and discharge FIM scores decreased 1.8?d, 2.2 points and 3.6 points, respectively, while predicted-discharge difference FIM scores increased 1.3 points. Discharge goals were not met 78.9% of the time. After controlling for patient characteristics, each predicted FIM point was associated with 0.6 discharge FIM points (p?<?0.0001). Factors associated with not meeting or exceeding goals were: age (odds ratio; OR?=?0.997), African Americans (OR?=?0.905), number of comorbidities (OR?=?0.970), number of complications (OR?=?0.932) and right brain stroke (OR?=?0.869). Factors associated with meeting or exceeding goals were: LOS (OR?=?1.03), admission FIM score (OR?=?1.02) and females (OR?=?1.05). Conclusions: Trends for lower goals and lower discharge function occurred over time. A correlation existed between predicted FIM scores and discharge FIM scores. Patient factors were associated with goal achievement.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Using the Functional Independence Measure, rehabilitation teams set lower goals for stroke rehabilitation in inpatient rehabilitation facilities during first 5.5 years of the IRF-PAI dataset.

• Discharge FIM scores also trended lower and fell at faster rate than goal FIM scores.

• Teams’ goal FIM scores averaged nearly 12 points higher than discharge FIM scores, and over 75% of patients did not reach goals for the rehabilitation stay.

• Factors associated with meeting or exceeding goals were: length of stay, admission FIM scores and being a female. Factors associated with not meeting or exceeding goals were: age, number of comorbidities and complications, having a right-brain stroke and being African American.

     

Rehabilitation outcome of elderly patients with hip fracture and cognitive impairment

Purpose:?To assess the association between cognitive status and functional gain during a rehabilitation programme for elderly patients with hip fracture.

Method:?Prospective study in a hospital geriatric rehabilitation unit. Sixty-one consecutive patients were studied: 28 with cognitive impairment (age 87.6?±?7.2 years, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 11.25?±?5.9), 23 with possible cognitive impairment (age 83.9?±?6.8 years, MMSE 22.65?±?1.6) and 10 without cognitive impairment (age 77.6?±?7.4 years, MMSE 29.5?±?0.9). Cognitive status was assessed with the MMSE and admission and discharge functional status with the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Functional gain was calculated by absolute FIM gain (admission FIM minus discharge FIM), relative (to maximum potential) FIM gain with the Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score (MRFS) and analysis of covariance of the FIM (ANCOVA).

Results:?Patients without cognitive impairment had significantly higher admission FIM and discharge FIM. Cognitive status was not significantly associated with absolute functional gain. The adjusted (age, gender, sensory impairment, nutritional status, comorbidity and treatment) MRFS score of cognitively impaired patients was significantly lower (p?<?0.03). However, the functional gain related to baseline functional status (ANCOVA) was not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusions:?In spite of cognitive impairment, elderly patients with hip fracture can benefit from participation in rehabilitation programmes.     

The role of patient demographics and clinical presentation in predicting discharge placement after inpatient stroke rehabilitation: analysis of a large,US data base

Purpose: To determine whether functional ability at admission and demographics predict discharge placement after inpatient rehabilitation for older adults recovering from stroke. Method: In this retrospective study, we examined records of 31,910 adults 65 years of age and older who were admitted for inpatient rehabilitation post-stroke. Binary logistic regression was used with the outcome of placement and potential predictors of the admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score, age, sex and marital status. Results: The average admission FIM was 60.0 out of 126; the average FIM at discharge was 84.8. The mean age was 77.7?±?7.3 years, 57% were female and 52.5% were not married. More than three quarters of the patients were discharged to home. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) showed that patients with a FIM score below the mean of our sample (OR = 5.8, CI = 5.5–6.2), older than the mean age of our sample (OR = 1.6, CI = 1.5–1.7), and who were not married (OR = 1.9, CI = 1.8–2.0) (p-values <0.001) were more likely to be discharged to residential care. Sex was not predictive of placement. Conclusion: The admission FIM was an important predictor of discharge placement after rehabilitation in older adults. Age and marital status were also significant predictors of discharge placement. Sex was not a significant predictor.

Implications for Rehabilitation

• Functional ability, age and marital status are significant predictors of discharge placement after stroke rehabilitation.

• Those who have lower admission Functional Independence Measure scores, are older, and are not married are more likely to be discharged to residential care than their counterparts who return home.

• Sex is not a significant predictor of discharge placement after stroke rehabilitation.

• To anticipate discharge placement after inpatient rehabilitation, the clinician should consider the age and marital support system of the patient, as well as the functional presentation at admission.

     

Validation of the Middlesex Elderly Assessment of Mental State (MEAMS) as a cognitive screening test in patients with acquired brain injury in Turkey

Purpose. Assessment of cognitive impairment with a valid cognitive screening tool is essential in neurorehabilitation. The aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Turkish-adapted version of the Middlesex Elderly Assessment of Mental State (MEAMS) among acquired brain injury patients in Turkey.

Methods. Some 155 patients with acquired brain injury admitted for rehabilitation were assessed by the adapted version of MEAMS at admission and discharge. Reliability was tested by internal consistency, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and person separation index; internal construct validity by Rasch analysis; external construct validity by associations with physical and cognitive disability (FIM); and responsiveness by Effect Size.

Results. Reliability was found to be good with Cronbach's α of 0.82 at both admission and discharge; and likewise an ICC of 0.80. Person separation index was 0.813. Internal construct validity was good by fit of the data to the Rasch model (mean item fit ?0.178; SD 1.019). Items were substantially free of differential item functioning. External construct validity was confirmed by expected associations with physical and cognitive disability. Effect size was 0.42 compared with 0.22 for cognitive FIM.

Conclusion. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of MEAMS as a cognitive impairment screening tool in acquired brain injury has been demonstrated.     

Functional independence measure scores predict level of long-term care required by patients after stroke: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Purpose: To examine whether Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores on admission can predict the future care levels of patients after acute stroke. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we enrolled post-acute stroke patients and assessed stroke subtypes, self-care abilities using FIM scores, and discharge destination. Patients’ care levels were assessed according to the Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) system (0–5: slight impairment to bedridden), the national insurance plan for care in Japan, at discharge. We divided patients into two groups according to LTCI care levels (0–2 versus 3–5) to compare their clinical characteristics using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The trial was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000012653). Results: Of the 1261 patients (47% female, mean age 75 years), 492 (39%) fulfilled LTCI care levels 0–2. FIM scores on admission were significantly correlated with LTCI care levels (p?<?0.001). On multivariate analysis, age and FIM scores on admission were found to be independent predictors of LTCI care levels 0–2. Conclusions: FIM scores on admission after stroke can independently predict later care requirements. Early prediction of LTCI care levels may contribute to the early supported discharge and improve the efficiency of healthcare planning.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• There is a clear relationship between Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores and the care levels certified by the Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) system, a national healthcare and insurance system in Japan.

• FIM scores on admission can predict future LTCI care levels required for patients after acute stroke.

• Early prediction of LTCI care levels may contribute to early supported discharge, improve the efficiency of stroke management and assist healthcare planning.

     

Functional outcome of ischemic stroke: A comparative study of diabetic and non-diabetic patients

Background and purpose. Diabetes is associated with more ischemic strokes and diabetic patients have up to a three-fold increased risk for suffering a stroke, compared with non-diabetics. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether diabetes mellitus may also affect the functional outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke, undergoing post-acute care rehabilitation.

Methods. A retrospective charts analysis of consecutive older patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted for rehabilitation at a tertiary hospital with post-acute care geriatric rehabilitation wards. Functional outcome of diabetics and non-diabetics was assessed by the Functional Independence Measurement scale (FIM?) at admission and discharge. Data were analysed by t-tests, Pearson correlation, and Chi-square test, as well as by linear regression analysis.

Results. A total number of 527 patients were admitted, of whom 39% were diabetics. Compared with non-diabetics, diabetic stroke patients were slightly younger (p = 0.0001) but had similar admission FIM scores. FIM gain parameters (total FIM gain, motor FIM gain, daily total and motor FIM gains) upon discharge were similar in both groups. A linear regression analysis showed that higher MMSE scores (β = 0.08; p = 0.01) and higher admission total FIM scores (β = 0.87; p < 0.001) predicted higher total FIM scores upon discharge. Diabetes mellitus was not interrelated, whatsoever, with better total FIM scores upon discharge (β = ?0.03; p = 0.27).

Conclusions. The findings suggest that there is no difference in the functional outcome of diabetic and non-diabetic patients, presenting for rehabilitation after acute ischemic stroke. Diabetes should not be considered as adversely affecting rehabilitation of such patients.     

Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative responsiveness of 2 commonly used upper-extremity motor scales, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), in evaluating recovery of upper-extremity function after an acute stroke in patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: An acute stroke rehabilitation unit. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred four consecutive admissions (43 men, 61 women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 72+/-13y) to a rehabilitation unit 16+/-9 days after acute stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The following assessments were completed within 72 hours of admission and 24 hours before discharge: ARAT, upper-extremity motor domain of the FMA, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, FIM instrument total score, and FIM activities of daily living (FIM-ADL) subscore. RESULTS: The Spearman rank correlation statistic indicated that the 2 upper-limb motor scales (ARAT, FMA) correlated highly with one another, both on admission (rho = .77, P < .001) and on discharge (rho = .87, P < .001). The mean change in score from admission to discharge was 10+/-15 for the ARAT and 10+/-13 for the FMA motor score. The responsiveness to change as measured by the standard response mean was .68 for the ARAT and .74 for the FMA motor score. The Spearman rank correlation of each upper-limb motor scale with the FIM-ADL at the time of admission was as follows: ARAT, rho equal to .32 (P < .001) and FMA motor score, rho equal to .54 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Both the FMA motor score and the ARAT were equally sensitive to change during inpatient acute rehabilitation and could be routinely used to measure recovery of upper-extremity motor function.     

Measuring rehabilitation outcome in post-acute hip fractured patients

Abstract

Purpose: To present our experience in measuring rehabilitation achievements of post-acute hip fractured patients with the FIM instrument; assess its appropriateness as to the patients’ various disability levels and describe our experience with other measuring tools in patients less sensitive to changes in the FIM instrument. Methods: A retrospective study performed in a post-acute geriatric rehabilitation center. Three hundred and eighty-seven hip fractured patients admitted from January 2010 to May 2012 were included in this study. Patients were evaluated by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the Timed Get Up and Go (TUG) test and “bed to chair” transfer FIM parameter. The study population was divided into three disability groups according to their admission disability level: high (admission FIM score <40), moderate (FIM 40–79) and low (FIM?≥?80). The Mann–Whitney U, ANOVA and Chi square tests analyzed the data. Results: The FIM instrument was found most sensitive in identifying functional change in patients with moderate disability. Low disability patients received more physio- and occupational-therapy treatment time, yet achieved a lower mean FIM score change compared to moderately disabled patients. The smallest real difference (SRD?=?13) for the FIM score was achieved by 60% of patients with moderate disability. When assessed by the TUG test, most patients (94%) improved their score. The SRD% of 31% was achieved by 71.7% of the patients. Nineteen patients (35.9%) achieved a discharge score of <20?s. The high disability group achieved the lowest mean FIM score change. On admission, 52/64 (81%) patients required considerable help in transferring from bed to chair (FIM 1–2), however, upon discharge, the majority (69.2%) improved to the level of a one man transfer (FIM?≥?3). Forty-one (64.1%) patients were discharged home. Conclusion: Post-acute hip fracture patients exhibit variable functional ability. Assessing rehabilitation achievements with a disability measure is limited; therefore, it is advisable to use an instrument most suitable to the patients’ disability level.

• Implication for Rehabilitation

• Post-acute hip fracture patients exhibit variable functional ability.

• Assessing rehabilitation achievements with a disability measure is limited.

• It is advisable to use an instrument most suitable to the patients’ disability level.

     

The work of rehabilitation

Purpose.?To describe three years of activity of a rehabilitation unit and to make comparisons between clients who receive different levels of active rehabilitation.

Method.?A retrospective study set in an inpatient rehabilitation facility located in Dunedin, New Zealand, examining 874 inpatient admissions over three financial years (2000?–?2002). Outcome measures include Functional Independence Scores (FIM) at admission and discharge, length of stay, weekly gains in FIM scores, and changes in FIM sub-scores.

Results.?Assessment and rehabilitation patients made significant FIM gains in comparison to assessment only and social relief (respite care) patients. Assessment and rehabilitation patients showed greater gains in the Physical dimensions of the FIM in comparison to the Cognitive although this is probably a function of different scaling. Floor and ceiling effects were not present in the FIM.

Conclusions.?The interdisciplinary rehabilitation program brings about real functional and cognitive gains in a range of patients as measured with the FIM. This adds to the considerable body of research which documents FIM gains and further provides evidence that physical and cognitive gains differ.     

Racial disparities in stroke functional outcomes upon discharge from inpatient rehabilitation facilities

Purpose.?Analyse racial disparities in clinical outcomes after stroke in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF).

Methods.?Analyses based on data from a multi-center prospective observational cohort study on inpatient stroke rehabilitation in six IRFs from across the United States. Multivariate models examined racial disparities in functional outcomes upon discharge, taking into account patient characteristics and detailed information on processes of care.

Results.?In the moderate stroke group (N?=?397), functional scores on admission were not significantly different between African-Americans and whites. In the severe stroke group (N?=?335), whites showed significantly lower functional scores at admission [Functional Independence Measurement, (FIM)], mean scores, 44 versus 49 for African-Americans, p?<?0.001). Multivariate analyses predicting discharge motor FIM score found no significant differences between African-American and white stroke patients (p?=?0.2194 and p?=?0.3547 in the moderate and severe stroke group, respectively).

Conclusion.?Controlling for patient characteristics, therapy intensity and processes of care results in non-significant differences between African-Americans and whites in motor FIM scores upon discharge. The absence of significant differences in recovery while patients were on the rehabilitation unit suggests that racial disparities in long-term functional recovery after stroke are likely to have originated before or after the inpatient rehabilitation stay.     

The impact of patient's weight on post-stroke rehabilitation

Purpose To evaluate the influence of patient’s weight on rehabilitation outcomes in first-event stroke patients. Design Retrospective, observational comparative study. 102 first-time stroke male and female patients admitted to the 52-bed neurology rehabilitation department in a rehabilitation hospital were included in the study. Body mass index (BMI), Functional Independence Measure (FIM) on admission and at discharge, as well as the delta-FIM (FIM on admission – FIM at discharge) were evaluated. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare the FIM and the NIHSS scores between BMI groups (normal, overweight, moderate and severe obesity). Results A statistically significant negative correlation (rho?=??0.20, p?=?0.049) was found between FIM change and BMI, that remained significant after adjustments for age, sex and hospitalisation days. No difference was found between groups in FIM or NIHSS change between BMI groups. Conclusions In sub-acute post-stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation in rehabilitation hospital, BMI was negatively associated with the improvement of functional parameters. Patients’ BMI should be taken into consideration when predicting rehabilitation outcome for stroke patients. Further investigations are needed to identify the functional parameters affected by the patients’ BMI.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• In sub-acute post-stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation in rehabilitation hospital, BMI was negatively associated with the improvement of functional parameters.

• Patients’ BMI should be taken into consideration when predicting rehabilitation outcome for stroke patients.

• New rehabilitation strategies should be designed to improve the functional outcomes of rehabilitation of obese patients.

     

New rehabilitation models for neurologic inpatients in Brazil

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the effects of a rehabilitation program in a neurological inpatient unit in terms of independence for activities of daily living and return to work. Method: Retrospective study with 148 adults with stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI), spinal cord injury, and Guillain–Barré syndrome admitted as rehabilitation inpatients within a 1-year period for hospitalization at the Instituto de Reabilitação Lucy Montoro, Brazil. According to their diagnostic groups, subjects undergone semi-standardized models of intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation for 4–6 weeks. Primary outcome measures: Functional Independence Measure (FIM?), Modified Rankin scale (Rankin), and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS Subjects were evaluated at admission, discharge, and 6 months after discharge. Results: Improvement in motor FIM?, Rankin and GOS was observed in all groups. Cognitive FIM? increase was less evident in TBI patients. After 6 months, 37.6% of patients were unemployed, 34% underwent outpatient rehabilitation, and 65.2% maintained gains. Conclusions: This is the first report on the effects from an inpatients rehabilitation model in Brazil. After a short intensive rehabilitation, there were motor and cognitive gains in all groups. Heterogeneity in functional gains suggests more individualized programs may be indicated. Controlled studies are required with larger samples to compare inpatient and outpatient programs.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The proposed brief model of rehabilitation for stroke, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, and Guillain–Barre syndrome inpatients shows promising results in terms of functional improvement.

• Apparent improvements in cognitive and motor levels can be observed after 30?d of the intensive hospital-based program five times a week focusing on caregiver and patients training.

• After 6 months of discharge, more than one third of patients remained out of work, but appeared to have kept the benefits attained during hospitalization, and performed physical activities in the community as outpatients.

     

Does English proficiency impact on health outcomes for inpatients undergoing stroke rehabilitation?

Purpose: To determine whether English proficiency and/or the frequency of interpreter use impacts on health outcomes for inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Method: Study design: Retrospective case–control study. Participants: People admitted for inpatient stroke rehabilitation. A high English proficiency group comprised people with native or near native English proficiency (n?=?80), and a low English proficiency group comprised people who preferred a language other than English (n?=?80). Outcome measures: Length of stay (LOS), discharge destination and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Results: The low English proficiency group showed a greater improvement in FIM from admission to discharge (p?=?0.04). No significant differences were found between groups in LOS, discharge destination and number of encounters with allied health professionals. Increased interpreter usage improved FIM efficiency but did not significantly alter other outcomes. Conclusion: English proficiency does not appear to impact on health outcomes in inpatient rehabilitation with a primarily in-house professional interpreter service. However, there is a need for a larger powered study to confirm these findings.

• Implications for rehabilitation

• People with low English proficiency undergoing inpatient stroke rehabilitation in a setting with a primarily in-house professional interpreter service, achieved similar outcomes to those with high English proficiency irrespective of frequency of interpreter usage.

• A non-significant increase of 4 days length of stay was observed in the low English proficiency group compared to the high English proficiency group.

• For patients with low English proficiency, greater change in Functional Independence Measure efficiency scores was observed for those with higher levels of interpreter use relative to those with low interpreter use. Clinicians should optimise use of interpreters with patients with low English proficiency when possible.

     

Efficient screening of cognitive dysfunction in stroke patients: Comparison between the CAMCOG and the R-CAMCOG,Mini Mental State Examination and Functional Independence Measure-cognition score

Background. The CAMCOG is a valid screening instrument for cognitive dysfunction in stroke patients but too time-consuming to be used by physicians in acute or post-acute care settings. The aim of this study was to identify a shorter cognitive screening test or combination of tests that yields the same results as the CAMCOG.

Methods. A total of 169 stroke patients completed the CAMCOG and the abbreviated Rotterdam-CAMCOG (R-CAMCOG), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the cognitive part of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM cognition) after admission to clinical rehabilitation and 1 year after stroke. The CAMCOG score was used as criterion standard for validity.

Results. Spearman correlations with the CAMCOG were very strong for the R-CAMCOG (both 0.92), strong for the MMSE (0.66 and 0.69) and moderate to weak for the FIM cognition (0.35 and 0.27). Stepwise linear regression analyses showed that, at admission, the R-CAMCOG explained 83% of the variance in the CAMCOG. The MMSE and R-CAMCOG together explained 87%. At 1 year after stroke the correlations and explained variances were similar.

Conclusion. The recently constructed R-CAMCOG appears an efficient alternative for the CAMCOG as a screening tool for cognitive dysfunction of stroke patients.     

Development and validation of the Italian version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III

Purpose.?To provide a translation and cultural adaptation of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III scale for Italy (i-SCIM3) and to validate this version of the scale.

Method.?i-SCIM3 was developed involving a forward–backward translation and administered to patients with spinal cord lesions (SCL) admitted to two centers. Two raters for each center evaluated patients at admission and discharge. Psychometric testing included reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and test–retest reliability. The validity of i-SCIM3 was assessed by comparing it with the Italian version of Functional Independence Measure? (FIM?).

Results.?One hundred three adult patients with SCL (84 males) with a mean age of 50.33?±?15.35 years were recruited. Seventy-four patients were paraplegic and 29 patients were tetraplegic. The median time elapsed between the two evaluations was 77.5 days (interquartile range, 53–144 days). Internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test–retest reliability were satisfactory overall, showing values higher than 0.90. The validity of i-SCIM3 was confirmed by the close correlation with FIM results both at admission and discharge (r?=?0.91, p?<?0.01). The sensitivity to change of i-SCIM3 was similar to that of FIM.

Conclusion.?i-SCIM3 was found to be a consistent, reliable, and valid scale for use in the clinical setting. It is the first validated scale in Italian for patients with SCL.     

Using EFA and FIM rating scales could provide a more complete assessment of patients with acquired brain injury

Abstract

Purpose: In some hospitals, patients exhibit significant heterogeneity of function at admission and discharge. The current study aims to assess if concurrent usage of the Early Functional Assessment (EFA) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM®) is warranted and practical in rehabilitation centers with diverse patient groups and outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study examined a data set of all patients with concurrent EFA and FIM scores admitted to a single rehabilitation center (4076 scores from 1251 patients). The patients had acquired brain injury of multiple etiologies and a range of severities. Results: The EFA scale was more able to characterize the function of lower functioning patients according to the FIM while the FIM scale was more able to characterize the function of higher functioning patients according to the EFA. This was highlighted by 21% of assessments with the lowest FIM score (18) having corresponding EFA scores of 22–76 and 27% of assessments with the highest EFA score (>90) having corresponding FIM scores of 38–126. Conclusions: In rehabilitation centers with diverse patient groups and outcomes, the FIM and EFA scale could be used to characterize the heterogeneity of function in patients with acquired brain injury. The EFA/FIM scale could be used concurrently in certain patients providing a more complete view of patients throughout the rehabilitation process.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Rehabilitation scales can be administered on multiple occasions to track the progress of a patient throughout the rehabilitation process; however, a lot of popular scales (such as the FIM®) are limited containing ceiling and floor effects for higher and lower functioning patients, respectively.

• In rehabilitation centers with diverse patient groups and outcomes, the FIM and EFA scale could be used to characterize the heterogeneity of function in patients with acquired brain injury.

• Concurrent usage of the scales could be indicated for some patients and each scale could provide information that the other scale does not provide however the FIM and EFA scales should be administered solely for EFA scores >90 (FIM administered solely) and the lowest FIM scores (EFA administered solely).

     

Pain perception during the rehabilitation phase following traumatic hip fracture in the elderly is an important prognostic factor and treatment tool

Purpose.?To evaluate the role of pain perception on admission to geriatric rehabilitation on the functional recovery after rehabilitation treatment in elderly patients with hip fracture and on the length of stay.

Method.?One hundred and sixty-five community dwelling elderly 65-year-old and over (mean age of 78 years), following recent operated traumatic hip fracture without clinical evidence for another acute medical or surgical condition were assessed regarding age, sex, chronic medical conditions, pre-fracture functional status, type of fracture and of operation, pain perception, and cognitive status. Pain was measured using the Visual Analogue Score (VAS). Functional status was measured using the Functional Independence Measurement (FIM). Activities of Daily Living (ADL) were assessed using the Katz index.

Results.?The average VAS score on admission was 7.38 ± 1.20 and on discharge 3.67 ± 1.18. Pain on admission inversely correlated to family support, function prior to fracture and cognitive status on admission, and correlated positively with depressed mood. With every increase of one point in VAS on admission above 4 points, the FIM on discharge decreased by 8.77 and the length of stay increased by 4.76 days.

Conclusions.?Pain intensity may add a valuable dimension for the prognostic evaluation of the patients with hip fractures. Inadequate early patient assessment and associated treatment impact on the patients' functional outcome, prolonged duration of rehabilitation treatment, and therefore, in addition to socio-economic effect, increase the cost to the local health care setting.     

Is the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) Associated with Inpatients’ Functional Performance?

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Occupational therapists in acute care settings often complete the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) screening tool to assess inpatients’ cognitive state. The scores obtained are often informally linked to a patient's global function either on the ward and/or at the point of discharge. Therefore, what is the association between inpatients’ performance on the MMSE and their functional performance? Purpose: This study investigated the association between the MMSE and the functional performance of inpatients with suspected dementia. Method: A within-subjects quantitative research design was employed whereby a sample of 30 participants suspected of having dementia were recruited from three acute care hospital sites in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. The MMSE was used to assess participants’ cognitive abilities while the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) provided a functional assessment score. Spearman's rho correlations and linear regression analyses were computed. Results: Eleven MMSE items were found to significantly associated with the FIM total score (Adjusted R² = 0.405, p < 0.05) and the FIM cognition subscale score (Adjusted R² = 0.683, p < 0.01). However, the MMSE items were not associated with the FIM motor subscale score (Adjusted R² = .315, p > 0.05). Conclusion: The MMSE scores derived for inpatients with a suspected dementia were significantly associated with the inpatients’ total FIM and cognition subscale scores, however, therapists need to be cautious when inferring any generalizations to inpatients’ motor task performance.