Head injury mortality in a geriatric population: differentiating an "edge" age group with better potential for benefit than older poor-prognosis patients

A comparison of outcomes between different modes of head-injury treatment in the elderly has important bearing on questions of cost-effectiveness and medical ethics. Here, we have examined rates of mortality in elderly head-trauma victims to determine whether it is valid to differentiate an "edge" age group of younger elderly patients, 65-74 years of age, from older elderly patients, considering possible benefit from intensive treatment and surgical intervention. We collected data from 1926 cases of head trauma and separated them into three age groups: 14-64 years, 65-74 years, and 75 years or older. We then compared these groups with respect to cause of injury, severity of injury, and whether or not treatment included either admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or surgical intervention. We found that road traffic accidents were the major cause of head injury in the younger age group, whereas in the elderly falls predominated. Mortality was higher in the elderly in all the head injury severity subgroups. Young subjects with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of less than or equal to 8 tended to benefit from ICU treatment whereas patients 75 and over did not, regardless of their severity of injury. For these patients who were in the 65-74 age group, the data suggested that some benefit was likely. Patients 75 and older were significantly less likely to survive surgical intervention than younger patients. We conclude that it is valid to treat patients in the age group 65-74 years as a separate group from those patients 75 and older. Patients in this younger subset of the elderly may benefit from ICU treatment or surgical intervention. However, the patients in our older subset of elderly patients clearly did not, and they had a significantly higher risk of surgical mortality.     

Mortality rates in geriatric patients with spinal cord injuries

OBJECT: The authors undertook this study to evaluate the incidence of spinal cord injury (SCI) in geriatric patients (> or = 70 years of age) and examine the impact of patient age, extent of neurological injury, and spinal level of injury on the mortality rate associated with traumatic SCI. METHODS: A prospectively maintained SCI database (3481 patients) at a single institution was retrospectively studied for the period from 1978 through 2005. Parameters analyzed included patient age, admission American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score, level of SCI, mechanism of injury, and mortality data. The data pertaining to the 412 patients 70 years of age and older were compared with those pertaining to the younger cohort using a chi-square analysis. RESULTS: Since 1980, the number of SCI-related hospital admissions per year have increased fivefold in geriatric patients and the percentage of geriatric patients within the SCI population has increased from 4.2 to 15.4%. In comparison with younger patients, geriatric patients were found to be less likely to have severe neurological deficits (greater percentage of ASIA Grades C and D injuries), but the mortality rates were higher in the older age group both for the period of hospitalization (27.7% compared with 3.2%, p < 0.001) and during 1-year follow-up. The mortality rates in this older population directly correlate with the severity of neurological injury (1-year mortality rate, ASIA Grade A 66%, Grade D 23%, p < 0.001). The mortality rate in elderly patients with SCI has not changed significantly over the last two decades, and the 1-year mortality rate was greater than 40% in all periods analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal cord injuries in older patients are becoming more prevalent. The mortality rate in this patient group is much greater than in younger patients and should be taken into account when aggressive interventions are considered and in counseling families regarding prognosis.     

A case control study for major trauma in geriatric patients

This study analyzed age as a univariate factor in survival in a national group of 46,613 major trauma patients and compared 180 elderly major trauma patients (greater than or equal to 65 years) to a similarly injured group of 3,918 younger patients (less than 65 years). In the national group, mortality rose sharply between age 45 (10%) and 55 (15%) and doubled at age 75 years (20%). This age-dependent survival decrement occurred at all Injury Severity Score values, for all mechanisms of injury, and for all body regions. In the comparison study, mortality in the elderly group was nearly double that of mortality in the younger group (27% vs. 14%). The older patients had a markedly higher complication death rate, especially for pulmonary (14/100 vs. 6.1/1100) and infectious complications (4.6/100 vs. 0.7/100). The median length of stay was twice as long for the older patients (14 days vs. 7 days). Cost data showed that the DRG prospective payment system grossly underestimated the cost of care for these patients (mean loss of $2,177.14 per patient). To minimize mortality and morbidity, triaging elderly trauma victims to trauma centers at a much lower threshold than similarly injured younger patients is recommended. The current DRG system should be altered to account for age-dependent morbidity. Further study is needed to determine whether more rigorous infection prophylaxis, immunomodulation, and pulmonary therapy will augment survival in elderly patients.     

Isolated traumatic brain injury: age is an independent predictor of mortality and early outcome

BACKGROUND: Geriatric trauma patients have a worse outcome than the young with comparable injuries. The contribution of traumatic brain injury (TBI) to this increased mortality is unknown and has been confounded by the presence of other injuries. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of age in the mortality and early outcome from isolated TBI. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all adult patients with isolated TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale score > or = 3) admitted during a 5-year period to two Level I trauma centers. Mortality, Glasgow Outcome Scale score at discharge, therapy, and complications were compared for elderly (age > or = 65 years) and younger patients. RESULTS: Of 694 patients, 22% were defined as elderly. The mortality for the elderly group was twice that of their younger counterparts (30% vs. 14%, p < 0.001), even for those with mild to moderate TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 9-15). Thirteen percent of elderly survivors had a poor functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 2 or 3) at hospital discharge versus 5% in the young group (p < 0.01). Independent factors associated with a high mortality were age and Glasgow Coma Scale score. CONCLUSION: The mortality from TBI is higher in the geriatric population at all levels of head injury. In addition, functional outcome at hospital discharge is worse. Although some of this increased mortality may be explained by complications or type of head injury, age itself is an independent predictor for mortality in TBI.     

Acute mortality and complications of cervical spine injuries in the elderly at a single tertiary care center

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review of all traumatic cervical spine injuries at a single tertiary care center. OBJECTIVE: To determine the acute survival of patients aged 65 and over with a variety of cervical spine injuries, regardless of operative or conservative treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Elderly patients with cervical spine injuries have historically suffered from high mortality rates. More recent literature has demonstrated improved outcomes among operatively treated elderly, but has suggested that the nonoperative treatment of cervical injuries in this population may itself contribute to increased mortality rates. METHODS: One thousand seventy-three consecutive patients were identified and initial hospitalization records reviewed. Ninety-four patients were excluded for incomplete data. The remaining 979 patients were divided by age into young and elderly groups. Sex distribution, mechanism, injury type, comorbidities, and mortality and complication rates were compared. Elderly patients were further divided into operative and nonoperative groups and acute outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The overall acute mortality rate for all patients with cervical spine injuries was 5.92%. Eighty-six percent of all patients 65 and over survived, as did 96.1% of younger patients. Seventy-three percent of elderly patients with complete injuries survived, as did 80% of those with incomplete injuries, and 95.6% of intact elderly. Acute mortality rates were statistically comparable in both the operatively and nonoperatively treated groups of elderly. CONCLUSIONS: In this large comprehensive series of elderly patients with cervical spine injuries, statistically comparable survival rates were achieved in both operatively treated and nonoperatively treated patient populations. This finding challenges the conclusion that the nonoperative treatment of the elderly necessarily results in increased acute mortality.     

Epidemiological and outcome characteristics of major burns in Tokyo

The Tokyo Burn Unit Association (TBUA) was established in 1983 funded by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government, and is organized by 13 burn units in Tokyo. TBUA covers more than 90% of severe burn patients occurring in Tokyo, and all of the cases are registered according to the burn injury registration format. The purpose of this study is to analyze the registered data and to elucidate epidemiological and outcome characteristics of major burn injuries in Tokyo. The total of 6988 hospitalized patients had data for epidemiological analysis, and 6401 patients had complete data for outcome analysis as well, and were included in this study. The characteristic profiles for the analysis included age, sex, cause of burns, inhalation injury, %BSA, burn index (BI), length of burn unit stay, and outcome, and were analyzed by age groups. The mean age of the patients was 40.4 years, and 63% of them were male. It was noteworthy that 25% of the total patients were elderly patients over 60 years of age. Flame was the most common cause making up 45.6% followed by scalding (32.0%). The overall mortality rate was 15.4%. Inhalation injury was accompanied in 27.3% of burn patients. The mortality rate was 34.6% with inhalation injury, and 8.2% without inhalation injury. Causes of death showed that multiple organ failure made up 36.9% of total mortality, followed by sepsis 25.2 and shock 19.0%. The burn size (%BSA and BI) and inhalation injury were the factors for high mortality rate in all age groups whereas age was a predictor for high mortality in the patients older than 16 years of age. Gender was not a factor for high mortality in any age group. The mortality rate showed mildly decreasing tendency since 1995 for which implementation of skin bank was thought to be responsible.     

Trauma in the elderly: intensive care unit resource use and outcome

BACKGROUND: As the population ages, the elderly will constitute a prominent proportion of trauma patients. The elderly suffer more severe consequences from traumatic injuries compared with the young, presumably resulting in increased resource use. In this study, we sought to examine ICU resource use in trauma on the basis of age and injury severity. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of trauma registry data prospectively collected on 26,237 blunt trauma patients admitted to all trauma centers (n = 26) in one state over 24 months (January 1996-December 1997). Age-dependent and injury severity-dependent differences in mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Elderly (age > or = 65 years, n = 7,117) patients had significantly higher mortality rates than younger (age < 65 years) trauma patients after stratification by Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score, and other preexisting comorbidities. Age > 65 years was associated with a two- to threefold increased mortality risk in mild (ISS < 15, 3.2% vs. 0.4%; < 0.001), moderate (ISS 15-29, 19.7% vs. 5.4%; < 0.001), and severe traumatic injury (ISS > or = 30, 47.8% vs. 21.7%; < 0.001) compared with patients aged < 65 years. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that elderly patients had a nearly twofold increased mortality risk (odds ratio, 1.87; confidence interval, 1.60-2.18; < 0.001). Elderly patients also had significantly longer hospital LOS after stratifying for severity of injury by ISS (1.9 fewer days in the age 18-45 group, 0.89 fewer days in the age 46-64 group compared with the age > or = 65 group). Mortality rates were higher for men than for women only in the ISS < 15 (4.4% vs. 2.6%, < 0.001) and ISS 15 to 29 (21.7% vs. 17.6%, = 0.031) groups. ICU LOS was significantly decreased in elderly patients with ISS > or = 30. CONCLUSION: Age is confirmed as an independent predictor of outcome (mortality) in trauma after stratification for injury severity in this largest study of elderly trauma patients to date. Elderly patients with severe injury (ISS > 30) have decreased ICU resource use secondary to associated increased mortality rates.     

Trauma in nonagenarians and centenarians: review of 137 consecutive patients

The purpose of this study was to examine the hospital course and outcomes of elderly trauma patients. We accomplished a retrospective review of all consecutive trauma patients admitted to a level II trauma center from January 2000 to April 2002. Gender, Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), operative procedure, morbidity, and mortality of patients > or = 90 years of age were compared with younger patients. Of 2645 trauma admissions, 137 patients (5%) were > or = 90 years (range, 90 to 108 years; mean, 93.1 years); 5 patients were > or = 100 years. One hundred eleven (81%) patients were female; 26 (19%) male. Average ISS for patients > or = 90 was 8.75 and was 7.78 for younger patients. One hundred sixteen elderly patients (85%) had ISS < 15. Falls were the most common mechanism of injury (93%), usually ground-level falls (64%). Two hundred ninety-two injuries included 133 fractures and 102 soft tissue injuries. Thirty-four elderly patients (25%) and 733 younger patients (29%) required surgery. Complications developed in 8 per cent of older and 6 per cent of younger patients. Hospital LOS averaged 4.36 days for older and 3.51 days for younger patients. Six older (4.4%) and 63 younger (2.5%) patients died. ISS scores and LOS were slightly higher in elderly patients, but morbidity and mortality were comparable in both groups.     

Mortality in Severely Injured Elderly Trauma Patients—When Does Age Become a Risk Factor?

Age is a well-known risk factor in trauma patients. The aim of the present study was to define the age-dependent cut-off for increasing mortality in multiple injured patients. Pre-existing medical conditions in older age and impaired age-dependent physiologic reserve contributing to a worse outcome in multiple injured elderly patients are discussed as reasons for increased mortality. A retrospective clinical study of a statewide trauma data set from 1993 through 2000 included 5375 patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > or = 16 who were stratified by age. The ISS and Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) quantified the injury severity. Outcome measures were mortality, shock, multiple organ failure, and severe head injury. Mortality in this series increased beginning at age 56 years, and that increase was independent of the ISS. The mortality rate increased from 7.3% (patients 46-55 years of age) to 13.0% (patients ages 56-65 years) in patients with ISS 16-24; from 23.8% to 32.1% in those with ISS 25-50; and from 62.2% to 82.1% in those with ISS 51-75 (P < or = 0.05). Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) was the most frequent cause of death, with a significant peak in patients older than 75 years. The incidence of lethal multiple organ failure increased significantly beginning at age 56 years (P < or = 0.05), but it showed no further increase in patients aged 76 years or older. In contrast, the incidence of lethal shock showed a significant increase from age 76 years (P < or = 0.05), but not at age 56 years. However, from age 56 years, mortality increased significantly in patients who sustained multiple trauma-an increase that was independent of trauma severity.     

Pelvic fracture in the elderly is associated with increased mortality

OBJECTIVE: The elderly population is currently the fastest growing sector in America. The purpose of this study was to examine the age-related outcome in patients after blunt pelvic injury. METHODS: All patients admitted with a pelvic fracture during a 5-year period were identified from the trauma registry. Data retrieval included: demographics, shock (BP < 90 mm Hg) on admission, injury severity score (ISS), abbreviated injury score (AIS) for head, chest, and abdomen, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and mortality. All pelvic fracture patterns were classified. Patient data were then stratified by age for comparison: young (< 55 years) and elderly (> or = 55 years). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, multiple logistic regression analysis, and chi-square test with significance set at P <.05. RESULTS: Three hundred five patients sustained a pelvic fracture (young [n = 248, 81.3%]; elderly [n = 57, 18.7%]). The only predictor of mortality was age. The 2 groups differed by gender (elderly = 54.4% females; young = 62.5% males) but not frequency of shock, ISS, or AIS for head, chest, and abdomen. Motor vehicle collision was the most common mechanism of injury (elderly = 68.4%; young = 73.8%). Lateral compression was the most common fracture pattern in both groups (elderly = 54.4%; young = 45.6%). There was no difference in transfusion (elderly = 2.5 +/- 0.7 vs young = 2.0 +/- 0.3; ns) but the elderly group was more frequently admitted to the ICU (elderly = 61.4% vs young = 46.8%; P =.065). Significantly more of the elderly group had a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (43.9% vs 10.1%, P <.001) and diabetes mellitus (10.5% vs 2.4%, P <.014). Mortality was significantly greater in the elderly group (12.3% vs 2.3%). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients sustaining a pelvic fracture were more likely to have a lateral compression fracture pattern, longer hospital LOS, and die despite aggressive resuscitation. This difference in outcome should help trauma surgeons recognize that the elderly patient sustaining a pelvic fracture is at increased risk of death.     

Trends and risk factors for mortality in elderly burns patients: A retrospective review

IntroductionThe elderly experience higher mortality rates and poorer outcomes compared to younger burn survivors with similar injuries.MethodsThis epidemiological study reviewed records of all admitted elderly burn patients collected from five burns facilities in Israel between 1997–2016. Collected data was limited to the population aged 20+, focused on the population aged 60+.ResultsMortality rates for elderly patients increased with TBSA and increases with age. Regression analyses demonstrated a decrease in mortality of 2.9% (p = 0.013) per 5 years, an overall decrease of 11.6% over the 20-year study period, with the decline more significant for older age groups. This decrease in mortality was much larger than that observed for all burns patients over this period. The most common cause of injury in the elderly population was fire, with mortality rate highest for this cause. There was no effect of gender on mortality rate. Mortality increased when smoke inhalation was present for TBSA<20%, with mortality unaffected by the presence of smoke inhalation for higher TBSA. The need for surgery correlates with high mortality rates.ConclusionThis study identified key factors that impact mortality and demonstrated a large decrease in mortality in the elderly patients over the study period.     

Geriatric falls: injury severity is high and disproportionate to mechanism

OBJECTIVE: Falls are a well-known source of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Fall-related injury severity in this group, however, is less clear, particularly as it relates to type of fall. Our purpose is to explore the relationship between mechanism of fall and both pattern and severity of injury in geriatric patients as compared with a younger cohort. METHODS: Our trauma registry was queried for all patients evaluated by the trauma service over a 412-year period (1994-1998). Two cohorts were formed on the basis of age greater than 65 or less than or equal to 65 years and compared as to mechanism, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Abbreviated Injury Scale score, and mortality. RESULTS: Over the study period, 1,512 patients were evaluated, 333 greater than 65 years and 1,179 less than or equal to 65 years of age. Falls were the injury mechanism in 48% of the older group and 7% of the younger group (p < 0.05). Falls in the older group constituted 65% of patients with ISS >15, with 32% of all falls resulting in serious injury (ISS >15). In contrast, falls in the younger group constituted only 11% of ISS >15 patients, with falls causing serious injury only 15% of the time (both p < 0.05). Notably, same-level falls resulted in serious injury 30% of the time in the older group versus 4% in the younger group (p < 0.05), and were responsible for an ISS >15 30-fold more in the older group (31% vs. <1%; p < 0.05). Abbreviated Injury Scale evaluation revealed more frequent head/neck (47% vs. 22%), chest (23% vs. 9%), and pelvic/extremity (27% vs. 15%) injuries in the older group for all falls (all p < 0.05). The mean ISS for same-level falls in the older group was twice that for the younger group (9.28 vs. 4.64, p < 0.05), whereas there was no difference in mean ISS between multilevel and same-level falls within the older group itself (10.12 vs. 9.28, p > 0.05). The fall-related death rate was higher in the older group (7% vs. 4%), with falls seven times more likely to be the cause of death compared with the younger group (55% vs. 7.5%) (both p < 0.05). Same-level falls as a cause of death was 10 times more common in the elderly (25% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Falls among the elderly, including same-level falls, are a common source of both high injury severity and mortality, much more so than in younger patients. A different pattern of injury between older and younger fall patients also exists.     

Impact of nosocomial infections in trauma: does age make a difference?

BACKGROUND: The effect of age and infection on outcome after trauma is unknown. We evaluated the incidence and impact that nosocomial infection (NI) and age have on morbidity and mortality. Several risk factors were identified and analyzed for correlation with infection. METHODS: Prospective data were collected on patients admitted for > or = 3 days over a 2-year period. Each patient was followed by an infectious disease specialist throughout their hospitalization. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines were used to diagnose infection. RESULTS: Of the 3,254 patients admitted, 88% were < 65 and 12% were > or = 65 years of age. Injury Severity Score was not significantly different (older vs. younger). Five hundred one (17.4%) of the younger patients developed an NI with a significantly higher hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and mortality compared with the noninfected group. One hundred forty-seven (39%) of the older group developed an NI and also had significant increases in hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and mortality. Older infected patients had the highest hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and mortality. The greatest relative risk of mortality was demonstrated with the combination of increased age and NI. Once infected, however, younger patients with penetrating trauma had a greater relative risk of mortality in the group-specific comparison. Many risk factors were associated with infection. Only chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in elderly trauma patients was a significant independent risk factor for infection. CONCLUSION: NI significantly increases hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and mortality after injury. Age increases risk of infection matched for injury severity, with a significantly higher hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and mortality. Once infected, however, younger patients with penetrating trauma have the greatest risk of mortality. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in elderly trauma patients was found to be an independent predictor of infection.     

Thoracic aortic endografting is the treatment of choice for elderly patients with thoracic aortic disease

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of age on outcomes following thoracic aortic endografting. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Endograft therapy for thoracic aortic disease is rapidly evolving. This therapy is less invasive, and elderly patients with significant medical comorbidities are more frequently referred for endografting. We hypothesized that elderly patients over the age of 75 have worse outcomes after thoracic endografting than patients under the age of 75. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of the first 42 patients who underwent endografting for thoracic aortic pathology. Charts were reviewed for demographics, comorbid conditions, perioperative complications and death, endoleaks, and results at 3, 6, and 12 months. Preexisting medical conditions were also evaluated to determine if any patient characteristics were associated with adverse outcomes. Perioperative morbidity included cardiac, pulmonary, renal, hemorrhagic, and neurologic (stroke and spinal cord injury) complications. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were under the age of 75, and 18 patients were 75 or older. Baseline demographics and comorbidities were similar between the 2 groups. There were no differences in operative time, length of stay, perioperative mortality, or the incidence of significant complications between the 2 age groups. Gender, however, was associated with a statistically significant difference between the occurrence of complications, with more women experiencing complications than men (P = 0.026, relative risk = 2.36). One patient (age >75 years) in the entire cohort of 42 (2.4%) suffered a spinal cord injury. At 3 months, endoleaks were more common in the older age group (P = 0.059). CONCLUSION: Endograft therapy for thoracic aortic disease can be performed safely in elderly patients with no significant increase in perioperative morbidity or mortality compared with younger patients. Female gender is associated with a higher likelihood of perioperative complications, regardless of age. The overall incidence of spinal cord injury is very low. Endograft therapy, when anatomically possible, is the treatment of choice for thoracic aortic disease in elderly patients.     

Age, blood transfusion, and survival after trauma

Blood transfusion affects outcomes after trauma, but whether elderly patients are disproportionately affected remains unknown. To determine the possible interaction between age, packed cell transfusion volume (PCTV), and mortality after injury, we designed a 6-year retrospective review (January 1995 through December 2000) of patients > or = 16 years of age who received blood transfusion within the first 24 hours after injury. One thousand three hundred twelve patients > or = 16 years of age admitted to our trauma center received packed red blood cells in the initial 24 hours after admission. Of the 1312 patients, 1028 (78%) were < or = 55 years and 284 (22%) were > 55 years of age, and overall mortality was 21.2 per cent. Age, Injury Severity Score (ISS) Glasbow Coma Scale (GCS), and PCTV emerged as independent predictors of mortality. PCTV for elderly survivors (4.6 units) was significantly less than that of younger survivors (6.7 units). Furthermore, mean PCTV for all survivors decreased progressively with advancing age. No patient >75 years with a PCTV > 12 units survived. Age and PCTV act independently, yet synergistically to increase mortality following injury.     

Elderly trauma inpatients in New York state: 1994-1998

BACKGROUND: The aging of the population in the United States has led to an increase in geriatric trauma. This study aimed to examine the characteristics and outcomes of geriatric trauma patients in New York State. METHODS: Four groups of elderly trauma patients (ages 40-64, 65-74, 75-84, and 85+ years) were contrasted with younger adults ages 13 to 39 years with respect to mechanism of injury, discharge disposition, hospital length of stay, comorbidities, and type of hospital in which they were treated. Also, the independent association of each group with in-hospital mortality was investigated for patients with blunt injuries using logistic regression. RESULTS: There was a 17.6% increase between 1994 and 1998 in the number of traumatic injuries qualifying for the New York State Trauma Registry in the 75- to 84-year-old group and a 16.4% increase in the group ages 85 years or older, despite a decrease in traumatic injuries in other age groups. The majority of these injuries among the patients 75 years of age or older resulted from low falls (from the same level). The mortality rate rose substantially with age, from 5.1% to 5.9% to 9.4% to 12.3% to 15.8%, respectively, for the groups ages 13 to 39, 40 to 64, 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85 or more years. Also, fewer than 20% of the patients older than 75 years died within 1 day after admission to the hospital, as compared with 44% of the patients younger than 65 years. The groups ages 40 to 64, 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85 years or older were all independent (increasingly) significant predictors of mortality for all three mechanisms of injury investigated. The adjusted odds ratios for mortality relative to patients who were 13 to 39 years of age were 2.67, 8.41, 17.40, and 34.98, respectively, for the groups ages 40 to 64, 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85 years or older. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma is a serious and escalating problem for the elderly, and increasing age is a significant risk factor for patient mortality.     

Therapeutic plasma exchange for renal-related conditions in the elderly: ten years experience in one center

The elderly people, 65 years old and above, are growing in number. The structural and functional changes associated with aging place the elderly at risk when challenged by extracorporeal therapies, such as therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). We retrospectively analyzed data on all patients who underwent TPE for renal indications at our institution between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2010 and compared renal indications and mortality associated with the use of TPE in older versus younger patients. During this period, 621 patients underwent 4722 sessions of TPE. Of them, 191 patients were elderly (30.7%) and they underwent 1289 sessions (27.3%) of TPE. A total of 104 patients (16.7%) underwent 593 sessions of TPE because of renal-related indications: 26 patients in the elderly group and 78 in the younger. Side effects of dyspnea and hypotension were documented in only two patients, both in the elderly cohort. The main indication for TPE in the elderly was glomerulonephritis (GN) as compared with renal allograft rejection in the younger cohort, with a trend toward more death in the elderly (p = 0.07). The multivariable regression model which included age as a category, serum albumin, and initial serum creatinine were unable to predict mortality in this group of patients. In our experience, the main renal indications for TPE in elderly are different from those for younger patients, with GN being the most common renal indication in the elderly. The TPE used for renal indications in the elderly is relatively safe. Trends toward death in the elderly may be multifactorial and not necessarily related to TPE.     

Fall-related injuries in the elderly in Tehran

During 13 months of data gathering, all injury-related information concerning trauma patients was gathered according to International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10). The severity of the injury was calculated according to Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS-90) in six major university hospitals in Tehran. Twelve percent of 8000 hospitalised trauma patients were elderly (65 years or older) and 70% of them (675 patients) had suffered from fall-related injuries. Falling on the ground and falling on stairs were the most common kinds of injury (with 462 (68%) and 122 (18%) cases, respectively). In the home and on the street were the most common sites of fall occurrence (with 520 cases (77%) and 91 cases (13.5%), respectively).After adjustment for the gender, kind of fall and Injury Severity Score, it was shown that the elderly were more prone to death than their younger counterparts (odds ratio=5.8, 95% CI for odds ratio: 2.3-7.2), but there was no significant difference in mortality rate between elderly men and women. Further studies are needed to evaluate personal and environmental risk factors for falls in our population. Furthermore, significantly higher mortality rate in our elderly trauma victims necessitates prudent attention to elderly trauma care in our teaching hospitals.     

Comparison between treatment results for gastric cancer in younger and elderly patients

INTRODUCTION: While gastric cancer shows an increased incidence in elderly patients, the rate of younger patients affected by this disease represents up to 15 %. Younger patients are frequently diagnosed with advanced tumor stages with a poor prognosis although literature data on this issue are controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 643 patients with primary gastric carcinoma were operated in our institution between March 1986 and December 2000. No neoadjuvant treatment was administered in these patients. We analysed the data of these patients retrospectively. A comparison of the results between patients younger than 40 years (n = 38, median age 37 years) and older than 70 years (n = 182, median age 75 years) was performed. RESULTS: The radical (R0-) resectability rate was rather high for both, younger (78.9 %) and elderly (76.9 %) patients. Postoperative morbidity was higher in elderly than in younger patients (32.9 % vs. 23.2 %; p < 0.05), as well as the postoperative mortality (7.7 % vs. 2.6 %; p < 0.05). Both younger and elderly patients showed advanced (II to IV) tumor stages (76.3 % vs. 73.3 %, n. s.). There was a significant difference between the rate of diffuse carcinomas in young and elderly patients (63.2 % vs. 22.5 %). The 5-years survival rate following R0-resection was significantly higher for younger patients (54.2 % vs. 32.9 %; p = 0.01), differences occurred only after the second postoperative year. CONCLUSIONS: The resectability of gastric carcinoma is not related to the patients age. Due to comorbidity, postoperative morbidity may be increased in elderly patients. Although both younger and elderly patients show advanced tumor stages, diffuse carcinomas are more frequent in younger patients. The short-term prognosis is similar for both age groups, long-term results are better for younger patients. The different life expectancy should be considered when interpreting these results.     

Changing Demographic Trends in spine trauma: The presentation and outcome of Major Spine Trauma in the elderly

IntroductionMajor trauma has seen a demographic shift in recent years and it is expected that the elderly population will comprise a greater burden on the major trauma service in the near future. However, whether a similar trend exists in those undergoing operative intervention for spinal trauma remains to be elucidated.AimsTo compare the presentation and outcomes of patients ≥65 years of age sustaining spine trauma to those <65 years at a national tertiary referral spine centre.MethodsThe local Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) database was analysed to identify spinal patients referred to our institution, a national tertiary referral centre, between 01/2016 and 05/2019. Patients were divided into a young cohort (16–64 years old) and an elderly cohort (> 64 years old). No explicit distinction was made between major and minor spine trauma cases. Variables analysed included patient demographics, injury severity, mortality, interventions, mechanism of injury and length of hospital stay.ResultsA total of 669 patients were admitted of which 480 patients underwent operative intervention for spinal trauma. Within the elderly cohort, this represented 75.3% of cases. Among the younger population, road traffic collisions were the most common mechanism of injury (37.1%), while low falls (<2 m) (57.4%) were the most common mechanism among the older population. Patients ≥65 years old had significantly longer length of stay (21 days [1–194] v 14 days [1–183]) and suffered higher 30-day mortality rates (4.6% [0–12] v 0.97% [0–4]).ConclusionOrthopaedic spinal trauma in older people is associated with a significantly higher mortality rate as well as a longer duration of hospitalization. Even though severity of injury is similar for both young and old patients, the mechanism of injury for the older population is of typically much lower energy compared to the high energy trauma affecting younger patients.