A phase I trial of Capecitabine+Gemcitabine with radical radiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Standard chemoradiotherapy with infusional 5FU for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has limited efficacy in this disease. The combination of Capecitabine (Cap) and Gemcitabine (Gem) are synergistic and are potent radiosensitisers. The aim of this phase I trial was thus to determine the highest administered dose of the Cap plus Gem combination with radical radiotherapy (RT) for LAPC. Patients had LAPC, adequate organ function, ECOG PS 0–1. During RT, Gem was escalated from 20–50 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ (twice per week), and Cap 800–2000 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ (b.i.d, days 1–5 of each week). Radiotherapy 50.4 Gy/28 fractions/5.5 weeks, using 3D-conformal techniques. Three patients were entered to each dose level (DL). Dose-limiting toxicity(s) (DLTs) were based on treatment-related toxicities. Twenty patients were accrued. Dose level (DL) 1: Cap/Gem; 800/20 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ (3 patients), DL2: 1000/20 (12 patients), DL3: 1300/30 (5 patients). Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in DL3; grade 3 dehydration (1 patient) and grade 3 diarrhoea and dehydration (1 patient). Dose level 2 was the recommend phase 2 dose. Disease control rate was 75%: PR=15%, SD=60%. Median overall survival was 11.2 months. The addition of Cap and Gem to radical RT was feasible and active and achieved at relatively low doses.     

Gemcitabine concurrent with radiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine (GEM) concurrent with radiation is clinically not well defined. We herein report four cases of chemo-radiotherapy against locally advanced pancreatic cancer using low-dose GEM concurrent with extra-beam radiation. A total of eight cases entered the study. Three were resected and five were non-resected cases. Intraoperative radiation was carried out in every case using an 8 or 10 centimeter cone with a radiation dose of 25 Gy. Postoperative radiation was 2 Gy per day on weekdays for 5 weeks. Four cases were concurrent with low-dose GEM (40 mg/m2) twice a week, whereas the other four were radiation only. With the use of GEM concurrent with radiation, tumor markers decreased more than 80 percent regardless of the tumor resection. CT scan confirmed a necrotic change and the decrease of the tumor size. In conclusion, low dose GEM concurrent with radiation therapy may be a promising therapeutic choice for the local control of advanced pancreatic cancers.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

We conducted a phase II trial to investigate the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiation in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty patients with inoperable NSCLC were enrolled onto a multicenter phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Patients received six weekly cycles of paclitaxel 45 mg/m(2) over 1 h; carboplatin at (area under the curve) AUC 2; and radiation therapy of 60 Gy. Radiation was administered to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (40 Gy over 4 weeks) followed by a boost to the primary tumor (20 Gy in 2 weeks). After the initial phase of concurrent chemoradiation, patients received an additional four cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) over 3 h and carboplatin at AUC 6 every 3 weeks. The overall objective response rate of 30 assessable patients was 76.7%. At the median follow-up time of 13.1 months, the median survival time was 14.5 months (95% CI, 10.59-18.48). The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (95% CI, 7.72-13.28). The major toxicity was hematologic. The incidence of grade 3 esophagitis was 10%. In conclusion, this chemoradiation regimen is well tolerated and shows significant clinical results for locally advanced NSCLC. Locoregional failure rate remains an important issue with this newer chemotherapeutic regimen. A novel chemotherapy and radiation therapy is clearly needed.     

Gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II trial

The 5-year survival for pancreatic cancer is usually less than 5%, and no treatment has demonstrated consistent effect on patient survival and disease-related symptoms. Early studies with gemcitabine suggested a modest antitumor activity with significant improvement in disease-related symptoms. This phase II study reports the activity of gemcitabine on 33 consecutive patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. Twenty-three patients had metastatic and 10 locally advanced unresectable disease. Twenty-six patients had not received any previous treatment and seven had received first-line chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil. Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was administered intravenously in 30 minutes in the first cycle once weekly for up to 7 weeks followed by 1 week rest; then in subsequent cycles, once weekly for 3 of every 4-week cycle. Four patients obtained partial response (12%). Fifteen patients (45%) had stable disease with a median duration of 32 weeks (range: 16-75 weeks), and 14 patients experienced progressive disease. Median duration of response was 34.5 weeks (range: 19-50 weeks). Median survival was 33 weeks (range: 2-91 weeks). All 4 responding patients and 14 of 15 (93%) patients with stable disease had improvement in performance status and decrease in daily analgesic requirement. Toxicity was mild and mainly consisted of moderate and rapidly reversible myelosuppression. We conclude that gemcitabine chemotherapy was very well tolerated and determined a significant clinical improvement with modest antitumoral activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Phase II trial of primary radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES: Primary chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) may improve local control, curative resection rate and long-term survival. We performed a phase II study to evaluate toxicity and activity of primary radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy with gemcitabine (GEM) twice weekly in patients (pts) with LAPC. METHODS: From 6/1999 to 6/2003, 23 LAPC pts received GEM 100 mg/m2 twice weekly in the first 15 pts and 50 mg/m2 in the last 8 pts, concurrently with radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/day for a total dose of 45 Gy). RESULTS: The treatment was completed in 19/23 pts. Toxicities: G3-4 hematological toxicity occurred in 35 and 4% respectively; G3 nausea and vomiting and gastrointestinal toxicity in 30%. Clinical benefit was found in 10/18 pts (55%). Overall response: partial response rate 4/18 (22%); stable disease 13/18 (72%); progressive disease 1/18 (6%). Six pts underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy (5/6 pts pT3, 1/6 pts microscopic cancer foci, 1/6 N+, 5/6 negative retroperitoneal margin). MEDIAN SURVIVAL: 14 months for the entire group, 12 months for unresected pts, 20 months for resected pts. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment with GEM twice weekly at 50 mg/m2 associated with radiotherapy (45 Gy) is feasible and permits to obtain clinical benefit in a good percentage of pts. Objective response, median survival, and local and systemic control are similar to other studies and need further improvement.     

吉西他滨联合同步放疗治疗局部晚期胰腺癌疗效观察

 目的 评价立体定向放射治疗联合吉西他滨与吉西他滨单药治疗局部晚期胰腺癌的疗效.方法 治疗组56例胰腺癌行立体定向放疗联合吉西他滨单药化疗。对照组50例仅行吉西他滨单药化疗。立体定向放疗,总剂量4 000～4 500 cGy, 10次分割。同步化疗方案为吉西他滨500 mg/m² 第1、8天。对照组给予输注吉西他滨1 000 mg/m², 第1、8、15天结果治疗结束2个月后CT复查,治疗组及对照组有效率分别为82%、16%,疼痛缓解率分别为 67%、17%。疾病进展时间治疗组为14个月,优于对照组7.5个月,差异有统计学意义（χ²= 7.31,P=0.032）。中位生存期治疗组和对照组分别为15.8个月及13.2个月,差异无统计学意义（χ²= 3.28,P=0.082）。结论立体定向放射治疗联合吉西他滨治疗局部晚期胰腺癌较单纯化疗组有效率、疼痛缓解率高;能延长疾病进展时间,但未能改善总生存期。     

Phase I trial of gemcitabine combined with radiation for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Gemcitabine has modest activity in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer and is a potent radiosensitizer. We conducted a Phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose of weekly gemcitabine delivered concurrently with radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head and to assess the treatment-related toxic effects associated with such a regimen. Eighteen patients with pathologically proven, locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head were enrolled in this study. Patients received seven weekly doses of gemcitabine with 3000 cGy of external beam radiation therapy delivered during the first 2 weeks of therapy. Six patients received gemcitabine at 350 mg/m(2)/week, nine at 400 mg/m(2)/week, and three at 500 mg/m(2)/week. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity was observed in over half the patients treated. Nonhematological toxicities were significant and included fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and dehydration. Forty-four % of the patients required admission to the hospital for management of nausea/vomiting and dehydration. The risk of hospitalization appeared to be dose-related; all of the three patients treated at 500 mg/m(2)/week required hospital admission during treatment. Seventeen patients were evaluated for response, and eight patients (47%) had evidence of a local anticancer effect. Four of these eight patients (24%) had a partial response to therapy. The median survival for the entire group was 6 months. The 1-year survival rate for patients with an objective response to therapy was 66%. The clinical responses observed in this group of patients suggest gemcitabine is a clinically relevant radiosensitizer in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, the toxic effects are significant, suggesting that until dose and scheduling issues are explored further, concomitant administration of gemcitabine and radiation therapy should still be considered investigational.     

Gemcitabine combined with coinstantaneous radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with coinstantaneous gemcitabine, and gemcitabine alone for advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods 56 advanced pancreatic cancer patients were assigned into observation group, which accepted stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with coinstantaneous gemcitabine 500 mg/m², d1,d8. Other 50 patients were assigned into the control group which only accepted gemcitabine 1 000 mg/m², d1,d8,d15. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was delivered with a total dose of 4 000 4 500 cGy in 10 fractions. Results CT examinations were carried out 2 months after treatment. The response rate of the observation group and control group was 82% and 16% respectively, and the pain relief rate was 67% and 17% respectively. The time to progression of the observation group was 14 months, and was better than that of the control group（7.5 months,χ²= 7.31，P=0.032）.The median survival time of the observation group and control group was 15.8 months and 13.2 months, and the difference had no statistical significance(χ²= 3.28，P=0.082). Concolusion Stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine has a better overall response rate and a pain relief rate. It can prolong the time to progression, but can′t improve the overall survival.     

Gemcitabine in the chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis

Aims

Whether gemcitabine based chemoradiotherapy (GEM-based CRT) is superior to 5-fluorouracil based chemoradiotherapy (5-FU-based CRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) remains uncertain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of GEM-based CRT compared with 5-FU-based CRT.

Methods

Electronic database including Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled trials register, PubMed (update to December 2010) and manual bibliography searches were carried out. A meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or other comparative studies comparing GEM-based CRT and 5-FU-based CRT were performed.

Results

Three RCTs and one retrospective comparative study including 229 patients were assessed. Meta-analysis showed survival advantage of GEM-based CRT compared with 5-FU-based CRT for 12-month (12-mo) survival rates (SRs) (RR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.05-2.26, p = 0.03). Moreover, there were also trends of benefit for SR after 6-months (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.98-1.30, p = 0.09) and 24-months (24-mo: RR 2.41, 95% CI 0.90-6.48, p = 0.08), though the trends did not reach statistical significance. More frequent severe acute hematologic toxicities were found in the GEM-based CRT group.

Conclusions

The meta-analysis found that GEM-based CRT was better than 5-FU-based CRT in the treatment of LAPC, especially for 12-mo SRs. However, the acute toxicity should be carefully regarded.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer

Purpose

Paclitaxel–cisplatin (TC) combination is effective and well tolerated in patients with unresectable gastric cancer. We investigated the efficacy and safety of TC for locally advanced gastric cancers in a neoadjuvant setting.

Methods

Patients received 2–4 courses of paclitaxel (80 mg/m²) and cisplatin (25 mg/m²) on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 4-weekly schedule, followed by radical gastrectomy. Primary endpoint was the pathological response rate: percentage of tumors in which one-third or more parts were affected.

Results

All 52 patients enrolled were eligible. Thirty-six (69.7 %) patients completed two or more courses of chemotherapy. Forty-three patients (82.7 %) underwent surgery, 33 (63.5 %) had R0 resection, and there was no treatment-related death. The pathological response was 34.6 % (95 % CI 22.0–49.1) for all registered patients; the null hypothesis of tumor response ≤10 % was rejected (p < 0.0001). The 3-year overall survival was 41.5 % (95 % CI 27.4–55.0).

Conclusions

The neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TC was safe and effective for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, and further study is needed to confirm the effectiveness of this regimen.     

Paclitaxel and concurrent radiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Purpose: To determine the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel and concurrent radiation for pancreatic cancer.

Methods and Materials: Forty-four patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer were studied. Patients received paclitaxel, 50 mg/m² by 3 h i.v. (IV) infusion, weekly, on Days 1, 8, 15, 22 and 29. Radiation was administered concurrently to a total dose of 50.4 Gy, in 1.80 Gy fractions, for 28 treatments.

Results: Nausea and vomiting were the most common toxicities, Grade 3 in five patients (12%). Two patients (5%) had Grade 4 hypersensitivity reactions to their first dose of paclitaxel. Of 42 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 26%. The median survival was 8 months, and the 1-year survival was 30%.

Conclusion: Concurrent paclitaxel and radiation demonstrate local-regional activity in pancreatic cancer. Future investigations combining paclitaxel with other local-regional and systemic treatments are warranted.     

Hyperfractionated radiotherapy and paclitaxel for locally advanced/unresectable pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: To determine prospectively the maximal tolerated dose and potential antitumor activity of weekly paclitaxel with concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced and/or unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We embarked on Phase I-II study of hyperfractionated radiotherapy using a concomitant in-field boost to a total dose of 63.80 Gy in 6 weeks at 1.1 Gy/fraction. Paclitaxel was administered weekly on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36 as a 3-h infusion. Paclitaxel doses were escalated from 20 mg/m(2)/wk to 70 mg/m(2)/wk. Twenty patients were studied, 14 women and 6 men (mean age 64 years). Some patients presented with one or more symptoms. Obstructive jaundice was the main presenting symptom in 10 patients and epigastric pain in 14. All patients had unresectable histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (15 head, 4 body, and 1 tail). Reasons for unresectability were involvement of the portal vein, and/or superior mesenteric artery (n = 14), paraaortic nodes (n = 8), and medically inoperable (n = 1). Fourteen patients underwent a biliary bypass procedure before treatment (four endoscopic stenting, five choledochojejunostomy, and five cholecystojejunostomy). The follow-up period ranged from 14 to 66 months (median 44). RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicity was observed at 70 mg/m(2)/wk. Grade IV Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late GI toxicity was seen in 1 patient in the form of duodenal stricture and hemorrhage. Grade II gastrointestinal adverse effects occurred in 13 patients and Grade 3 in 1 patient. No neurologic morbidity was encountered. Eight patients required cytokine support for Grade 2 and 3 neutropenia. The treatment course was delivered within the planned time in 80% of the patients. Complete relief of pain occurred in 10 of 14 patients. The CA 19-9 level was either stable or decreasing in 12 of 15 patients. Of 17 assessable patients, stable disease was seen in 10, regression in 2, a partial response in 3, and a complete response in 2. CONCLUSION: The use of hyperfractionated radiotherapy to a dose of 63.80 Gy with concomitant weekly paclitaxel is tolerated. The maximal tolerated dose of paclitaxel for this study was 60 mg/m(2)/wk. The preliminary objective responses denote activity of the regimen. We recommend testing this regimen in larger scale studies.     

Phase I dose escalation study of capecitabine and erlotinib concurrent with radiation in locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Purpose

Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The median survival of locally advanced nonoperable disease is approximately 9 months. 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy has been the standard treatment. However, the survival benefit of this approach is modest. To improve the efficacy of 5-FU-based chemoradiation therapy, we evaluated the safety and feasibility of the combination of capecitabine and erlotinib with radiotherapy in this group of patients.

Experimental design

A traditional “3 + 3” dose escalation design was adopted in the study. A total of four dose levels were designed. For safety purpose, a minus I dose level (?I) was also planned. The ?I level consisted of capecitabine 600 mg/m² and erlotinib 50 mg daily, and the remaining four dose levels were as follows: level I: capecitabine 600 mg/m² bid (twice daily); level II: 700 mg/m² bid; level III: 825 mg/m² bid; and level IV: 925 mg/m² bid. Erlotinib was administered at 100 mg daily at all dose levels. Erlotinib and capceitabine were given continuously Monday through Friday concurrent with radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions).

Results

A total of 18 patients were consented. Fifteen patients were enrolled and completed therapy. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. The most frequent side effects were lymphopenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, electrolyte imbalances, and skin rashes. The majority of the toxicities were grade 1 and 2. No objective response was observed. The median progression-free survival was 0.59 years (95 % CI 0.31–1.1), and the median overall survival was 1.1 years (95 % CI 0.62–1.59).

Conclusions

The combination of capecitabine and erlotinib with radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer is well tolerated and feasible at the dose level of capecitabine 925 mg/m² bid and erlotinib 100 mg daily.     

Phase I trial of twice-weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiation in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities, and potential antitumor activity of twice-weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were studied at the Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The initial dose of gemcitabine was 20 mg/m(2) by 30-minute intravenous infusion each Monday and Thursday for 5 weeks concurrent with 50.4 Gy of radiation to the pancreas. Gemcitabine doses were escalated in 20-mg/m(2) increments in successive cohorts of three to six additional patients until dose-limiting toxicity was observed. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicities at 60 mg/m(2) given twice-weekly were nausea/vomiting, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Twice-weekly gemcitabine at a 40-mg/m(2) dose was well tolerated. Of the eight patients eligible for a minimum follow-up of 12 months, three remain alive, one of whom has no evidence of disease progression. CONCLUSION: A dose of twice-weekly gemcitabine at 40 mg/m(2) produced mild thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, nausea, and vomiting when delivered with concurrent radiation to the upper abdomen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. These data suggest this regimen is well tolerated and may possess significant activity. These data and other observations have resulted in a phase II Cancer and Leukemia Group B study to ascertain the efficacy of this treatment regimen in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Phase I trial of gefitinib with concurrent radiotherapy and fixed 2-h gemcitabine infusion, in locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: Pancreatic cancers are resistant to radiotherapy (RT) and current chemotherapy agents. Epidermal growth factor receptor is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer, and in vitro studies have shown that epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors can overcome radio- and chemoresistance. The aim of the study was to determine whether the addition of gefitinib to RT and gemcitabine for patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC) was feasible and safe. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen patients with pathologically proven LAPC, based on major vascular invasion based on helical computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound, were entered into the study. The targeted irradiated volume included the tumor and 2-cm margin. Prophylactic irradiation of regional nodes was not allowed. Patients with >500 cm(3) of planning tumor volume were excluded. An initial cohort of 6 patients was treated with RT (45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks) plus concomitant gefitinib (250 mg/day). Successive cohorts of patients received 100, 150, and 200 mg/m(2)/day of gemcitabine in a 2-h infusion over Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 with gefitinib (250 mg/day) and RT. Gefitinib was continued after RT until progression. A pharmacodynamic study of angiogenic markers was also performed to evaluate a possible antiangiogenic effect. RESULTS: There were no dose-limiting toxicities. Common toxicities were mild neutropenia, asthenia, diarrhea, cutaneous rash and nausea/vomiting. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) progression-free survival was 3.7 (95% CI = 1.9-5.5) months, and the median overall survival was 7.5 (95% CI = 5.2-9.9) months. No significant reduction of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-8 was observed after treatment. CONCLUSION: Our results support that the combination of gefitinib, RT, and gemcitabine has an acceptable toxicity but with modest activity in LAPC.     

Gemcitabine plus epirubicin in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II multicenter trial

The aim of this phase II multicenter trial was to evaluate the activity of a novel combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and epirubicin (EPI) in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. Clinical benefit and response rate were the main efficacy end-points. From December 1997 to October 1999, 30 consecutive patients with measurable advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously in 30 min at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 followed by i.v. injection of epirubicin 25 mg/m(2); treatment was repeated every 28 days. With regard to clinical benefit response, 8/21 patients (38%) experienced significant palliation of tumor-related symptoms; the median symptom control time was 25 weeks. No complete responses were recorded while 6 patients achieved a partial remission, for an overall response rate of 20%; 10 patients (30%) had a stable disease and 14 (46%) had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 14 weeks. Median survival was 26 weeks, with 6 patients (20%) having long-term survival at 46 weeks. In general, chemotherapy was well tolerated; 9 patients (30%) suffered from WHO grade 3-4 haematological toxicity and 5 patients (16.6%) suffered from grade 3 non-haematological toxicity. In conclusion, the GEM plus EPI regimen represent a feasible approach for improvement of clinical benefit in advanced pancreatic cancer patients, but confirmatory investigations are required.     

Phase II trial of combined regional hyperthermia and gemcitabine for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer

Purpose: Despite advances in cancer therapy, treating pancreatic cancer remains one of the major challenges in the field of medical oncology. We conducted this phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regional hyperthermia combined with gemcitabine for the treatment of unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods: Eligibility criteria included histologically proven, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously at a dose of 1000?mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Regional hyperthermia was performed once weekly, 1 day preceding or following gemcitabine administration. The primary end point was the 1-year survival rate. Secondary objectives were determination of tumour response and safety.

Results: We enrolled 18 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer between November 2008 and May 2010. The major grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia and anaemia; however, there were no episodes of infection. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (ORR + stable disease) were 11.1% and 61.1%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 8 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 33.3%. Median OS of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer was 17.7 months.

Conclusions: Regional hyperthermia combined with gemcitabine is well tolerated and active in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Phase I trial of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine is the most promising new agent currently being tested in pancreatic cancer. The present study was conducted to confirm the tolerability of a weekly schedule of gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 in Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The primary end-point was to evaluate the frequency of dose-limiting toxicity. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 was administered over 30 min weekly in two schedules: gemcitabine x3 every 4 weeks (Schedule 1) and gemcitabine x7 followed by a week of rest and then gemcitabine x3 every 4 weeks thereafter (Schedule 2). At least three patients entered each schedule and three additional patients were treated in the presence of dose-limiting toxicity. RESULTS: Eleven chemo-naive patients with a good Karnofsky performance status of > or =80 points and distant metastasis were entered into this trial. In Schedule 1, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the three patients. In Schedule 2, the evaluation of dose-limiting toxicity was complete in six of the eight enrolled patients and two patients showed dose-limiting toxicity in this Schedule; one patient experienced both grade 4 leukocytopenia and grade 4 neutropenia, and both grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 GOT/GPT increased in another patient. Two patients (18%) showed a partial response and a clinical benefit response was also achieved in two (29%) of the seven evaluable patients. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly x7 followed by a week of rest and weekly x3 every 4 weeks thereafter may be tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Phase I dose escalating trial of hyperfractionated pre-operative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer

Purpose: To determine the acute toxicity, post-operative complications, pathologic response and extent of downstaging to high dose pre-operative radiation using a hyperfractionated radiation boost and concurrent chemotherapy in a prospective Phase I trial.Materials & Methods: To be eligible for this study, patients had to have adenocarcinoma of the rectum less than 12 cm from the anal verge with either Stage T4 or T3 but greater than 4 cm or greater than 40% of the bowel circumference. All patients received 45 Gy pelvic radiation (1.8 Gy per fraction). Subsequent radiation was given to the region of the gross tumor with a 2 cm margin. This “boost” treatment was given at 1.2 Gy twice daily to a total dose of 54.6 Gy for Level I, 57 Gy for Level II, and 61.8 Gy for Level III. 5-FU was given at 1g/m² over 24 hours for a four day infusion during the first and sixth weeks of radiation, with the second course concurrent with the hyperfractionated radiation. Surgical resection was carried out 4–6 weeks following completion of chemoradiation (in curative cases) and additional adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 5-FU and Leucovorin was given for an additional 4 monthly cycles Days 1 through 5 beginning four weeks post surgery.Results: Twenty-seven patients, age 40–82 (median 61), completed the initial course of chemoradiation and are included in the analysis of toxicity. The median follow-up is 27 months (range 8–68). Eleven patients were treated to a dose of 54.6 Gy, nine patients to 57 Gy, and seven patients to 61.8 Gy. Twenty-one patients had T3 tumors, and six patients T4 tumors. Grade III acute toxicity from chemoradiation included proctitis (5 patients), dermatitis (9), diarrhea (five), leukopenia (1), cardiac (1). Grade IV toxicities included one patient with diarrhea (on dose Level I) and one patient (on dose Level III) with cardiac toxicity (unrelated to radiation). Surgical resection consisted of abdominal perineal resection in 16 and low anterior resection in 7. Four patients did not undergo a curative resection; three initially presented with metastases and one developed metastasis during the pre-operative regimen. Post-operative complications included pelvic or perineal abscess in two (on dose Levels I & II), and delayed wound healing in two (one of whom, on dose Level III, developed perineal wound dehiscence requiring surgical reconstruction). Of the 23 patients who had a curative resection, four manifested pathologic complete responses (17.4%). Thirteen of 23 patients (57%) had evidence of pathologic downstaging and only 1/23 patients (on dose Level I) had a positive resection margin. Of these 23 patients (with a minimum follow-up of 8 months), the patient with positive margins was the only one who developed a local failure (Fisher’s Exact p = .04). The 3-year actuarial OS, DFS and LC rates are 82%, 72% and 96%, respectively. Twelve of 13 patients (92% at 3 years) ≥ 61 years vs. 5/10 patients (45% at 3 years) < 61 years remained disease-free (log-rank p = 0.017).Conclusion: This regimen of high dose pre-operative chemoradiation employing a hyperfractionated radiation boost is feasible and tolerable and results in significant downstaging in locally advanced rectal cancer. The vast majority of patients (96%) achieved negative margins, which appears to be a prerequisite for local control (p = 0.04). Older age (≥61 years) was a significant predictor for improved DFS. This regimen (at dose Level III, 61.8 Gy) is currently being tested in a Phase II setting.