Endodontic infection control routines among general dental practitioners in Sweden and Norway: a questionnaire survey

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate endodontic infection prevention and control routines among general dental practitioners in Sweden and Norway.

Materials and methods: A questionnaire was sent by email to 1384 general dental practitioners employed in Sweden and Norway. The participants were asked questions concerning different aspects of infection prevention and control during endodontic treatment; use of rubber dam, sealing of rubber dam, antibacterial solutions, and use of hand disinfectant and gloves.

Results: The response rate was 61.4% (n: 819). 96.9% reported routinely using rubber dam during endodontic treatment. 88.3% reported always, or sometimes, sealing the area between rubber dam and tooth. Most disinfected the endodontic operative field, but the antibacterial solutions used varied. 11.9% did not use gloves at all during treatment, and 10.5% did not use hand disinfectant during treatment.

Conclusions: Most of the general dental practitioners took measures to establish and maintain aseptics during endodontic treatment, which infers an awareness of the importance of endodontic infection prevention and control. But the results were self-reported and there may be a gap between claimed and actual behaviour. Further studies using observation methodologies are needed to assess how infection control routines are performed in everyday clinical practice.     

To Drill or Not to Drill: Management of Endodontic Emergencies and In-Process Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic

IntroductionDental professionals are at high risk of contracting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection because of their scope of practice with aerosol-generating procedures. Recommendation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to suspend elective dental procedures and avoid aerosol-generating procedures posed significant challenges in the management of patients presenting with endodontic emergencies and uncertainty of outcomes for endodontic procedures initiated, but not completed, before shutdown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success of palliative care on endodontic emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic and to evaluate the stability of teeth with long-term Ca(OH)₂ placement because of delays in treatment completion.MethodsPatients presenting for endodontic emergencies during COVID-19 Shelter-in-Place orders received palliative care, including pharmacologic therapy and/or non–aerosol-generating procedural interventions. Part I of the study evaluated the effectiveness of palliative care, and need for aerosol-generating procedures or extractions was quantified. Part II of the study evaluated survivability and rate of adverse events for teeth that received partial or full root canal debridement and placement of calcium hydroxide before shutdown.ResultsPart I: Twenty-one patients presented with endodontic emergencies in 25 teeth during statewide shutdown. At a follow-up rate of 96%, 83% of endodontic emergencies required no further treatment or intervention after palliative care. Part II: Thirty-one teeth had received partial or full root canal debridement before statewide shutdown. Mean time to complete treatment was 13 weeks. At a recall rate of 100%, 77% of teeth did not experience any adverse events due to delays in treatment completion. The most common adverse event was a fractured provisional restoration (13%), followed by painful and/or infectious flare-up (6.4%), which were managed appropriately and therefore seemed successful. Only 1 tooth was fractured and nonrestorable (3%), leading to a failed outcome of tooth extraction. The remaining 4 outcome failures (13%) were due to patient unwillingness to undergo school-mandated COVID testing or patient unwillingness to continue treatment because of perceived risk of COVID infection.ConclusionsPalliative care for management of endodontic emergencies is a successful option when aerosol-generating procedures are restricted. This treatment approach may be considered in an effort to reduce risk of transmission of COVID-19 infection during subsequent shutdowns. Prolonged Ca(OH)₂ medicament because of COVID-19 related delays in treatment completion appeared to have minimal effect on survival of teeth.     

Methods Helping Dentists to Detect Dental Fear

ObjectivesDental fear is common and yet often remains unrecognised. COVID-19 has challenged health care since 2020. This study aimed to evaluate patients’ self-reported dental fear and detection of dental fear by the dentists. Another aim was to validate a colour code instrument for estimating dental fear. The influence of COVID-19 on fear and attendance was assessed.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in the primary urgent dental care of Oulu, Finland, in spring 2020 and 2021 after the first (T1) and third waves (T2) of the pandemic. Data were obtained for analyses using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS), Facial Image Scale (FIS), and a new “traffic light” colour code for dental fear (CCF). The influence of COVID-19 on dental fear and attendance was assessed with structured and open-ended questions. The questionnaires were completed by 273 anonymous participants.ResultsOf the participants, 167 (61.2%) visited dental care during T1 and 106 (38.8%) during T2. Their mean age was 45.1 years. An MDAS score of 19 or above, indicating severe fear, was reported by 10.6% of the participants. Of those with severe dental fear, 87% chose the red colour in the CCF “traffic light” system. The association between dentists’ and participants’ estimation of dental fear was weak (P < .001) and agreement with the red code was nonexistent (Cohen's kappa value = −0.035). MDAS scores of the younger participants were higher than those of the older ones after the first wave (T1) (P = .021). COVID-19 had the strongest influence on dental attendance and dental fear of those having the most severe self-reported dental fear as measured by the MDAS.ConclusionsColour-coded traffic lights seem valid for screening severe dental fear and are easy and quick to use. They could be useful tools especially since recognising dental fear seems difficult for dentists. The COVID-19 pandemic has complicated dental care for the most fearful individuals.     

Dentists’ knowledge,attitudes, and professional behavior toward the COVID-19 pandemic: A multisite survey of dentists’ perspectives

BackgroundCOVID-19 continues to affect the dental community worldwide. The authors conducted a cross-sectional electronic study using a multisite survey to examine dentists’ knowledge, attitudes, and professional behavior toward COVID-19 and the affect on their livelihood.MethodsA questionnaire was circulated via e-mail and social media platforms to dentists in North America, Europe, Eastern Mediterranean, and Western Pacific regions. It covered demographic characteristics and questions about the COVID-19 outbreak related to dentists’ levels of comfort for preventive and safety measures, provision of treatment, affect on work, and financial implications. Responses were tabulated and analyzed by means of χ² or Fisher exact test. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare means. P < .05 was considered significant.ResultsA total of 1,251 dentists responded. General dentists represented 63.9% of the respondents and 62.5% worked in private practice. The global score for level of comfort with the preventive measures and provisions of treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic was low (14 of 30), and differences between regions were significant (P < .01); dentists working in private practice and general dental practitioners were less comfortable (P < .01).Conclusions and Practical ImplicationsThe respondents reported a lack of preparedness to confront a highly infectious respiratory disease. A new level of protective armamentarium in the dental operatory and updated operational guidance and policies are required, necessitating educators and regulators to ensure the delivery of knowledge and skills to oral health care providers. Dentists need to address the sustainability of their practices and have a robust business plan.     

Work experience influences treatment approaches in endodontics: a questionnaire survey among dentists in Western Norway

Objectives: To collect information on endodontic treatment procedures among dentists in the public dental service (PDS) in Western Norway and relate this information to their work experience.

Materials and methods: A survey comprised of 35 questions related to personal information, frequency of endodontic treatment, endodontic procedures and treatment principles was distributed electronically to 187 dentists in PDS in two counties of Western Norway.

Results: The response rate was 74%, and 130 dentists participated. Among them, 57.0% had completed their education less than 13 years ago, and almost all were below 39 years old (95%). The majority (81.0%) had graduated in Norway. Stepwise caries excavation in primary and permanent teeth and direct pulp capping in primary teeth were more frequently performed by dentists with less than 13 years from graduation. Routine use of rubber dam was high among the responders (87%). However, use of rubber dam and master-cone radiograph uptakes were more frequent among the younger dentists. The majority used rotary instrumentation systems, and almost all participants followed the current guidelines for use of antibiotics in endodontics.

Conclusions: In general, dentists in PDS follow the current endodontic treatment guidelines. However, it seems that the more recently graduated dentists perform more endodontic procedures and tend to adhere more to the taught principles regarding rubber dam use and radiograph uptakes.     

Current Trends in Endodontic Treatment by General Dental Practitioners: Report of a United States National Survey

Introduction

In the United States almost 70% of root canal treatment (RCT) is performed by general dentists (GPs), yet little is known about their treatment protocols.

Methods

A paper survey was mailed to 2000 United States GPs with questions about the types of endodontic cases treated, routine treatment protocols, use of newer technologies, and endodontic continuing education (CE).

Results

Completed surveys were returned by 479 respondents (24%). GPs who perform RCT (84%) reported providing anterior (99%), bicuspid (95%), and molar (62%) RCT and retreatment (18%). Rubber dam was used always (60%), usually (16%), sometimes (13%), and never (11%). Newer technologies used by GPs included digital radiography (72%), magnification (80%), electronic apex locator (70%), and nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation (74%). Compared with GPs with >20 years of experience, those in practice for ≤10 years were more likely to use rubber dam (P < .05), nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation (P < .001), apex locators (P < .001), and magnification (P < .01); in contradistinction, GPs in practice >20 years were more likely to perform retreatments (P < .05). Women were less likely to perform retreatment or molar RCT (both P < .05). GPs with >5 hours of CE were more likely to use rotary instrumentation (P < .001), irrigant activation devices (P < .01), and apex locators (P < .001) and perform molar RCT (P < .001) and retreatment (P < .05), but no more likely to use rubber dam.

Conclusions

Recent GP graduates (≤10 years) were more likely to adopt new technologies and use rubber dam than those who practiced for >20 years. More experienced GPs were more likely to take on complicated cases than those with fewer years of practice. There was no association between hours of CE and compliance with rubber dam usage.     

Was the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Associated with an Increased Rate of Cracked Teeth?

IntroductionThere is lack of data on whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was associated with changes in the etiology of pathosis in endodontic patients. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of cracks and other etiologic factors during the period of March 16th to May 31st in 2020 (COVID-19 initial outbreak) and 2021 (COVID-19 ongoing pandemic) compared with figures from the same period in 2019 (pre-COVID era) in 2 endodontists’ practices.MethodsThe etiologies of patients’ chief complaints were determined from records of 2440 teeth (740 in 2019, 651 in 2020, and 1049 in 2021). Changes in the proportion of etiologic factors among all 3 periods were analyzed. The association between the rate of cracked teeth and patients’ age and sex was determined using a logistic regression model.ResultsThe rates of all etiologies collectively during the studied periods showed a significant change (P < .0001). The rate of cracks significantly increased in 2020 (11.8%) (P = .0001) and 2021 (8%) (P = .0018) compared with 2019 (4.3%). The rate of persistent infections decreased in 2020 (22.3%) (P = .0013) and then increased in 2021 (27.5%) (P = .0153) compared with 2019 (30%). Cracked teeth were associated with the age group of 40–60 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.882; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.063–3.330) in 2020 and with age ranges of 40–60 years (OR = 2.051; 95% CI, 1.120–3.759) and >60 years (OR = 2.038; 95% CI, 1.050–3.956) and male sex (OR = 1.599; 95% CI, 1.019–2.510) in 2021.ConclusionsThe rate of cracked teeth increased during the initial outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and 1 year later. This study provided evidence on the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in the rate and presentation of endodontic etiologic factors.     

Reopening Dental Offices for Routine Care Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Report From Palestine

ObjectivesThis study reports on the readiness of Palestinian dentists to reopen their practices for routine care during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.MethodsA cross-sectional study targeted dentists in the West Bank area of Palestine using an online survey during the first 2 weeks of May 2020. Questions mainly asked about dentists’ perception of the risks of COVID-19, readiness to reopen their clinics for routine care, and the level of confidence in dealing with patients suspected of having COVID-19.ResultsA total of 488 dentists completed the survey. Almost 60% believed that they were not ready to reopen their practices. Almost 13% had “no confidence” in dealing with patients with COVID-19, while 64% had “little to moderate” confidence. Confidence was correlated negatively with increased fear of becoming infected (ρ = -0.317, P < .0001) and positively with years of practice (ρ = 1.7, P < .0001). Dentists who received updated training on infection control or on COVID-19 reported higher levels of confidence (χ² = 53.8, P < .0001, χ² = 26.8, P < .0001, respectively). Although 88% preferred not to treat patients with COVID-19, 40% were willing to provide care to them. Almost 75% reported that they were already facing financial hardships and could not survive financially until the end of the current month.ConclusionsEthical and financial reasons were the main drivers for dentists in this sample to reopen their practices for routine care. Data from this study highlights the fragility of private dental practice in emergency situations. Ethical, health, and financial challenges that emerged during COVID-19 require dentists to adapt and be better prepared to face future crises.     

Is Bilateral Mental Incisive Nerve Block Better than Unilateral Mental Incisive Nerve Block during the Endodontic Management of Mandibular Incisors with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis? A Prospective Single-blind Randomized Clinical Trial

IntroductionThe purpose of this clinical trial was to comparatively evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of unilateral and bilateral mental incisive nerve block (MINB) during the endodontic treatment of inflamed mandibular incisors.MethodsThe study was designed as a crossover single-blind study. A total of 76 patients requiring endodontic intervention in at least 2 mandibular incisors participated in this trial. The patients randomly received unilateral or bilateral MINB of 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine at 2 separate appointments. To blind the procedure, a saline injection was given on the contralateral side in the unilateral injections. The endodontic procedure was initiated in the incisors on the side of the first anesthetic injection. Patients with a negative response to electric testing received endodontic access opening under rubber dam. Patients were asked to report pain, if any, during the endodontic procedure by using a Heft-Parker visual analog scale. The anesthetic success was defined as no or mild pain on Heft-Parker visual analog scale (score, 0–54). The statistical analysis was performed with McNemar tests at P values <.05.ResultsThe success rates of unilateral MINB and bilateral MINB were 38% and 64%, respectively, for the central incisors and 44% and 69%, respectively, for the lateral incisors. The difference was statistically significant (P < .05).ConclusionsThe bilateral MINB was more successful during the endodontic management of mandibular incisors with inflamed pulps. However, both the techniques failed to give 100% success rates.     

The Effect of Rubber Dam Usage on the Survival Rate of Teeth Receiving Initial Root Canal Treatment: A Nationwide Population-based Study

Introduction

It is well-known that the usage of rubber dams during root canal treatment (RCT) improves infection control and treatment efficacy and protects patients. However, the effect of rubber dam usage on endodontic outcomes remain uncertain. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether rubber dam usage affects the survival rate of initial RCT using a nationwide population-based database.

Methods

A total of 517,234 teeth that received initial RCT between 2005 and 2011 met the inclusion criteria and were followed until the end of 2011. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effects of rubber dam usage on the risk of tooth extraction after initial RCT.

Results

Of the 517,234 teeth, 29,219 were extracted, yielding a survival rate of 94.4%. The survival probability of initial RCT using rubber dams after 3.43 years (the mean observed time) was 90.3%, which was significantly greater than the 88.8% observed without the use of rubber dams (P < .0001). After adjusting for age, sex, tooth type, hospital level, tooth scaling frequency per year after RCT, and systemic diseases, including diabetes and hypertension, the tooth extraction hazard ratio for the RCT with rubber dams was significantly lower than that observed for RCT without rubber dams (hazard ratio = 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.84).

Conclusions

The use of a rubber dam during RCT could provide a significantly higher survival rate after initial RCT. This result supports that rubber dam usage improves the outcomes of endodontic treatments.     

Characteristics of Endodontic Emergencies during Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak in Wuhan

IntroductionIn late 2019, an outbreak of a new coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was detected in Wuhan, China. A great percentage of patients with this disease developed symptoms of dry cough, malaise, and a high fever. During this time, several patients requiring assessment and treatment of endodontic emergencies were directed to the School and Hospital of Stomatology at Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. We examined the characteristics of these patients.MethodsA total of 96 patients with a mean age of 42.24 ± 18.32 years visited the general and emergency department of the School and Hospital of Stomatology at Wuhan University because of endodontic emergencies during the peak period of February 22 to March 2, 2020. Patient information was collected and organized by date of visit, sex, age, and systemic disease history. Body temperature was measured and acquired for each patient, a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemiologic investigation questionnaire was given to each patient, an endodontic diagnosis was determined for the offending tooth, and a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) was used to record pain levels.ResultsOf the total patient visits during this period, 50.26% of visits were for endodontic treatment. No patients had a fever (>37.2°C). One patient with a confirmed COVID-19 history was admitted after recovery. Three admitted patients had been exposed to confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients. Twelve admitted patients (12.5%) with a mean age of 62.42 ± 13.77 years had a history of systemic diseases. The most common age group for endodontic emergencies was 45–64 years (30.21%), and patients of this group showed a significantly higher mean VNRS score compared with that of the 6- to 19-year age group and the 20- to 34-year age group (P < .05). The majority of endodontic emergency diagnoses were diseases of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (53.10%). Patients who were diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, symptomatic apical periodontitis, and acute apical abscess showed a significantly higher mean VNRS score than that of other groups (P < .05).ConclusionsEndodontic emergencies, with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis being the most common, consist of a much higher proportion of dental emergencies in a COVID-19 high-risk area than normally. Vital pulp therapy can advantageously reduce treatment time, resulting in a reduced risk of infection for vital pulp cases. Rubber dams, personal protective equipment, and patient screening are of great importance during the COVID-19 outbreak in protecting clinicians.     

Attitudes of final year dental students to the use of rubber dam

Aim  To investigate the attitudes of final year dental students in Wales and Ireland to the use of rubber dam.
Methods  A pre-piloted questionnaire was distributed to final year dental students in Cardiff and Cork Dental Schools in January 2008. Information sought included attitudes to, and the current and anticipated use of, rubber dam for a variety of operative and endodontic treatments.
Results  Of 93 questionnaires distributed, 87 were completed and returned (response rate = 94%; Cardiff: 89%, n  = 51; Cork: 100%, n  = 36). Rubber dam was routinely used by 98% of respondents ( n  = 85) on adult patients, but only 32% of respondents ( n  = 28) had used rubber dam on child patients ( P  < 0.05). Rubber dam was never used by 75% of respondents ( n  = 65) when placing posterior amalgam restorations, and by 21% of respondents ( n  = 18) when placing anterior composite restorations. Rubber dam was used by 98% of the respondents ( n  = 85) when performing root canal treatments. Sixty-two per cent of respondents ( n  = 54) believed their use of rubber dam would decrease once leaving the dental school.
Conclusion  Whilst dental students believe that rubber dam is relevant to clinical dentistry, there are negative perceptions associated with its use amongst dental students. More than half of those questioned predicted their use of rubber dam would decrease once in independent practice. Greater emphasis should be placed on the advantages of using rubber dam in clinical dentistry whilst at dental school.     

The 5-Year Survival Rate of Nonsurgical Endodontic Treatment: A Population-based Cohort Study in Korea

IntroductionThe purpose of the current population-based study was to analyze the 5-year survival rate of teeth that received nonsurgical endodontic treatment. Specifically, the variables affecting the 5-year survival rates of endodontically treated teeth were analyzed.MethodsThe present study included all endodontically treated teeth reported in 2010 in the National Health Insurance Cohort database of the Republic of Korea. By tracing the dental records of the sample to the end of 2015, the 5-year survival rates of the initial root canal treatment (RCT) and re-RCT were analyzed. Gender, age, institution type, diagnosis, arch type, tooth type, number of visits, and rubber dam usage were included in the analyses as confounding variables.ResultsIn total, 2,866,749 teeth received initial RCT, and 173,429 teeth received re-RCT. Five-year survival rates were 90.85% and 88.42%, respectively. The survival rate of teeth that received initial RCT was significantly higher than that of those that received re-RCT. Specifically, re-RCT showed a significantly higher rate of extraction within 12 months than during other intervals. Furthermore, the following characteristics significantly positively affected the 5-year tooth survival rate: being female, <20 years of age, hospital as the institution type, mandibular teeth, anterior teeth, initial RCT, and use of rubber dam.ConclusionsBecause of its high 5-year survival rate, endodontic treatment is an effective method for maintaining natural teeth.     

Multifaceted impact of COVID-19 on dental practice: American dental care professionals prepared and ready during unprecedented challenges

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the multifaceted impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dental practices and their readiness to resume dental practice during arduous circumstances.MethodsThe authors distributed an observational survey study approved by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Institutional Review Board to dental care practitioners and their office staff members using Qualtrics XM software. The survey was completed anonymously. The authors analyzed the data using R statistical computing software, χ² test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test.ResultsNearly all participants (98%) felt prepared to resume dental practice and were confident of the safety precautions (96%). Only 21% of dentists felt the COVID-19 pandemic changed their dental treatment protocols, with at least two-thirds agreeing that precautions would influence their efficiency adversely. Although most participants were satisfied with the resources their dental practice provided for support during the pandemic (95%), most were concerned about the impact on their general health and safety (77%) and to their dental practice (90%), found working during the pandemic difficult (≈ 60%), and agreed there are challenges and long-term impacts on the dental profession (> 75%).ConclusionsDental care professionals, although affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and at high risk of developing COVID-19, were prepared to resume dental practice during most challenging circumstances.Practical ImplicationsThe pandemic has affected dental care practitioners substantially; thus, there is need to formulate psychological interventions and safety precautions to mitigate its impact. Further research should evaluate the long-term effects on dentistry and oral health and interceptive measures for better communication and programming around future challenges.     

Estimating COVID-19 prevalence and infection control practices among US dentists

BackgroundUnderstanding the risks associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission during oral health care delivery and assessing mitigation strategies for dental offices are critical to improving patient safety and access to oral health care.MethodsThe authors invited licensed US dentists practicing primarily in private practice or public health to participate in a web-based survey in June 2020. Dentists from every US state (n = 2,195) answered questions about COVID-19–associated symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 infection, mental and physical health conditions, and infection control procedures used in their primary dental practices.ResultsMost of the dentists (82.2%) were asymptomatic for 1 month before administration of the survey; 16.6% reported being tested for SARS-CoV-2; and 3.7%, 2.7%, and 0% tested positive via respiratory, blood, and salivary samples, respectively. Among those not tested, 0.3% received a probable COVID-19 diagnosis from a physician. In all, 20 of the 2,195 respondents had been infected with SARS-CoV-2; weighted according to age and location to approximate all US dentists, 0.9% (95% confidence interval, 0.5 to 1.5) had confirmed or probable COVID-19. Dentists reported symptoms of depression (8.6%) and anxiety (19.5%). Enhanced infection control procedures were implemented in 99.7% of dentists’ primary practices, most commonly disinfection, COVID-19 screening, social distancing, and wearing face masks. Most practicing dentists (72.8%) used personal protective equipment according to interim guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.ConclusionsCOVID-19 prevalence and testing positivity rates were low among practicing US dentists. This indicates that the current infection control recommendations may be sufficient to prevent infection in dental settings.Practical ImplicationsDentists have enhanced their infection control practices in response to COVID-19 and may benefit from greater availability of personal protective equipment. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04423770.     

Prevalence of Nonendodontic Diagnoses in Periapical Biopsies: A 6-year Institutional Experience

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to identify nonendodontic periapical lesions (NPLs) mimicking endodontic pathosis, which are most frequently encountered by clinicians.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on biopsies obtained from 2015–2020 at Texas A&M College of Dentistry’s oral pathology laboratory. The online database was screened for cases submitted as suspected endodontic pathology using specific key words. Histologic diagnoses were collected to determine the prevalence of NPLs that were originally thought to be of endodontic origin. The frequency and percentage of endodontic pathology and NPLs were documented.ResultsAmong 6704 biopsies clinically diagnosed as endodontic lesions, 190 (2.8%) were histopathologically diagnosed as NPLs. The most frequent NPLs were odontogenic keratocytes’ (n = 70, 36.8%), cemento-osseous dysplasia (n = 27, 14.2%), and dentigerous cysts (n = 22, 11.6%). Of all NPLs, 3.7% were malignant neoplasms, with the most common diagnosis being squamous cell carcinoma. Of 6514 endodontic histologic diagnoses, the prevalence of periapical granulomas and cysts was 60.2% (n = 3924) and 39.1% (n = 2549), respectively.ConclusionsAlthough most endodontic submissions are likely to be histologically diagnosed as periapical granulomas or cysts, the clinician should be aware that a small portion of these lesions may be nonendodontic in origin and possibly neoplastic in nature. Histopathologic evaluation of biopsied specimens is critical to achieve a proper diagnosis to ensure the appropriate management of patients.     

Endodontics Specialists’ Practice during the Initial Outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019

IntroductionThe first outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States resulted in a nationwide closure of dental offices that created an oral health crisis. The aim of this observational study was to analyze and compare the characteristics of patients who visited 2 private endodontics offices from March 16 to May 31, 2020, compared with the same period in 2019.MethodsDemographic, diagnostic, and procedural data of 1520 (693 in 2020 and 827 in 2019) patient visits were collected. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on patient-related variables.ResultsBivariate analyses showed that the number of patient visits decreased in April and May 2020 (P < .0001). In 2020, patients’ self-reported pain level was higher, they were more frequently diagnosed with pulp necrosis and acute apical abscess, and they received more incisions for drainage (P < .05). Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that the COVID-19 outbreak was associated with less visits for older patients (>49.5 years) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.720; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.573–0.906), more patients with kidney diseases (OR = 2.690; 95% CI, 1.143–6.331), higher levels of pain on percussion (OR = 2.277; 95% CI, 1.718–3.016), less cases with previously initiated treatment (OR = 0.242; 95% CI, 0.080–0.731), less periapical diagnoses of asymptomatic apical periodontitis (OR = 0.510; 95% CI, 0.306–0.849), and a higher number of nonsurgical root canal treatments (OR = 2.073; 95% CI, 1.397–3.074) and apicoectomies (OR = 2.799; 95% CI, 1.367-5.729).ConclusionsThese findings show that the public health burden of endodontic infections was more intense during the initial outbreak of COVID-19.     

The use of rubber dam in the UK. A survey

The purpose of this survey was to determine the frequency of use of rubber dam isolation in the United Kingdom for both operative and endodontic procedures. Questionnaires were sent to 1800 dentists throughout the country, with 1008 returns (56%). Most replies were from dentists active in general dental practice. The use of rubber dam is largely neglected and more than 70% of all dentists surveyed did not utilise rubber dam for any procedure whatsoever.