Three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures in the elderly: Eminence versus evidence

The majority of proximal humerus fractures are minimally displaced and good outcomes can be achieved with nonoperative treatment strategies. However, controversy exists regarding the best management of highly comminuted and displaced proximal humerus fractures that occur in elderly patients with poor bone quality. Although surgical options including open reduction and internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty can restore excellent function, the rate of catastrophic failure remains high measuring between 20% and 40%. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has recently been introduced as a means for treatment of these fractures with intermediate results demonstrating improved range of motion, functional outcomes, and lower rates of revision.     

Treatment of proximal humerus fractures

The majority of proximal humerus fractures are treated nonoperatively with good functional results. Multiple options exist for treating displaced fractures, without a clear advantage of any one method for a given fracture type. Goals include an adequate reduction and stable fixation to initiate early motion and rehabilitation. Decision-making should be based on patient and injury specifics and surgeon's experience. Various types of fixation, including plates, nails, or percutaneous pins, can maintain sufficient stability to promote shoulder mobility and function. Any of these methods will have few complications when undertaken with appropriate patient selection and careful surgical technique. Preliminary results of locking plates in the proximal humerus suggest that this is a favorable treatment option for displaced, comminuted proximal humerus fractures, which compares well with established methods. Locked plating may improve fracture stability in some complex patterns and facilitate early rehabilitation. It is possible that some fractures previously treated with hemiarthroplasty may be managed successfully with locking plates. Prospective study to assess the complications, outcomes, and cost effectiveness of nonoperative management compared to various surgical treatment options is warranted.     

Acute proximal humeral fractures: The reverse TSA solution

Proximal humerus fractures represent the third most common fracture in patients above the age of 65. Hemiarthroplasty is currently the accepted gold standard for the treatment of displaced and comminuted fracture patterns. Functional outcomes have been shown to rely upon anatomic reduction and tuberosity union with especially unreliable results in patients with poor bone quality. Studies show that the reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures is associated with greater range of motion and long-term functional outcomes compared to hemiarthroplasty and thus should be considered in older patients.     

Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures

Open reduction of proximal humeral fractures has the advantage of providing direct control over each fracture fragment and permitting anatomic reduction and fixation with advanced devices. Modern fixed-angle locking plates designed specifically for proximal humerus fractures have allowed the expansion of surgical indications permitting surgeons to address more complicated fractures. Advanced preoperative imaging and fluoroscopy allow a better understanding of fracture patterns and permit the surgeon to use this knowledge intraoperatively. Research is required to further validate fracture classification systems, to develop surgical guidelines for decision making, and to compare the outcomes of the various treatments options for proximal humerus fractures.     

Locking plates in proximal humerus fractures

It is well known that proximal humerus fractures are among the three most frequent fracture types. Epidemiological invetsigations show that in people elder than 60 years the fracture of the proximal humerus is more frequent than fractures of the hip region (17). Over the last decades several techniques have been applied for treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Widely accepted is the initiation of a conservative treatment regimen for undisplaced fractures, however, the standard treatment for displaced fractures, especially three and four part fractures, is still the center of scientific debate. Many different implants have been tested and investigated, thus demonstrating lack of sufficient results. Over the last years the development of angle stable, locking implants started and clinical studies demonstrated encouraging results. In our clinic the locking proximal humerus plate and the PHILOS plate advanced to the implant of choice for treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures. There are still cases of implant failure and humerus head necrosis, but most of these complications were caused by the fracture type and not an implant specific problem. However the overall results with these new implants are encouraging. Key words: locking plates, proximal humerus fracture, humerus, humerus fracture, PHILOS, PHP.     

Bilateral traumatic proximal humerus fractures managed by open reduction and internal fixation with locked plates

Fractures of the proximal humerus are uncommon in young patients.Although bilateral fracture of proximal humerus itself is rare,association with epilepsy and electrocution is frequent.Only one case of traumatic bilateral proximal humerus fracture has been reported in the literature.We report a rare case of bilateral traumatic displaced proximal humerus fractures in a 40 years old male patient,which was treated by means of open reduction and internal fixation with proximal humerus locked pates on both sides and obtained a good functional outcome.     

Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures: is a Sling as Good as a Plate?

The treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures is challenging and complex, as its success is predicated on multiple factors. While it is clear that a majority of proximal humerus fractures may be treated nonoperatively, it is less clear which patients benefit from surgical management. The PROFHER trial, a randomized controlled study, used patient-reported outcomes to compare surgical to nonsurgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures. The purpose of this review is to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the PROFHER trial and to assess the validity of its conclusion in the context of existing literature. The authors found no difference in the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) between the surgical and nonsurgical groups. Additionally, no difference was found between groups in any of the secondary outcomes, which included the Short-Form 12 (SF-12) health survey, surgical and fracture-related complications, additional surgery or therapy, inpatient medical complications, and mortality. They concluded that the recent increase in surgical management of proximal humerus fractures is perhaps unwarranted. While the randomization was successful and the pragmatic design may enable greater generalizability, this study possesses numerous flaws inherent in such an ambitious endeavor, including an inability to identify specific factors which explain the lack of superiority of surgical management. Despite its weaknesses, this study is a valuable datapoint which encourages surgeons to reexamine their surgical indications for this injury.     

A preliminary clinical experience with Polarus nail for proximal humeral fractures. A pilot study on ten patients

The Polarus nail has recently been popularised to fix proximal humeral fractures. In the current pilot study we reviewed the early results obtained using this nail. Ten patients with proximal humeral fracture (four pathological, 5 traumatic and one non-union) were fixed using a Polarus nail. The fractures were classified according to Neer (7 two-parts and 3 three-part fractures). The mean followup was 22 months (6–39) months. The following criteria were assessed: pain, range of shoulder movement and function. Seven patients were satisfied with their operation, their fractures healed in a mean period of 3 months (2–4 months). No postoperative neurovascular complications were encountered; the re-operation rate, was however 30%. Conclusion: in the authors' brief pilot study in 10 patients, and despite the heterogenous fracture types, we came in to conclusion that the indications for using Polarus nail is limited due to the high complications rate associated with the procedure when used for displaced three or four part surgical neck fracture of humerus.     

Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are we operating on too many?

Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a relatively rare injury, the treatment of which remains controversial, especially regarding Neer displaced two-part, and three-part and four-part fractures. Operative indications for most displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly remain poorly defined, but recent literature is actually supporting less aggressive approaches except for the most severe fractures. Recent epidemiological and larger scale retrospective studies fail to show a significant functional difference between operative and non-operative treatment of displaced two-part and three-part fractures in the elderly. Most four-part fractures appear to be best treated with hemiarthroplasty. Recent meta-analyses show a need for well-executed, randomized, prospective studies that can be used to provide evidence-based templates for appropriate management of displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.     

Locked intramedullary nailing for treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures

Controversy surrounds the optimal technique for fixation of displaced fractures, although locked intramedullary nailing is emerging as a preferred technique in managing displaced proximal humerus fractures in appropriately selected patients. This technique provides stable fracture fixation allowing early postoperative mobilization critical in ensuring a pain-free shoulder with a functional range of motion. Additional advantages include the ability to insert by way of a minimally invasive approach with limited soft tissue dissection, achieve accurate anatomic reduction, provide a secure construct even in the situation of osteopenic bone or comminution, and manage fractures of the proximal humerus extending into the shaft.     

Arthroscopically treated proximal humeral fracture malunion

Articles describing the treatment of proximal humerus malunion are limited. Although in most of the cases, shoulder arthroplasty is the treatment of choice, when the articular surface of the humeral head is intact, other techniques can be considered and successfully used as well. Using arthroscopic techniques for proximal humerus malunion treatment is rarely reported in the literature. We could find only a few cases in which arthroscopic subacromial decompression was used to treat greater tuberosity malunion. Arthroscopic debridement and capsulotomy are also considered in the treatment of proximal humeral malunion cases with shoulder joint stiffness. This case report describes the completely arthroscopic treatment of a 4-part proximal humeral fracture malunion associated with pain and restricted range of motion. The main deformity in our case was medially displaced malunited lesser tuberosity that was blocking the internal rotation of the humerus. Isolated displaced lesser tuberosity fractures are rare injuries. Open techniques are usually the treatment of choice. We did not find any reports of arthroscopic treatment of lesser tuberosity malunion as a separate entity or as a component of a proximal humerus malunion. The early result in our case strongly encourages using arthroscopic techniques for lesser tuberosity malunion treatment as well as expanding the indications for shoulder arthroscopy in proximal humerus malunion cases.     

Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures with the polarus intramedullary nail

The optimal treatment method for displaced proximal humeral fractures continues to be under debate. There are a variety of fixation techniques, none of which has been proven to be more effective. We retrospectively studied 24 patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures, treated with the Polarus intramedullary nail. All patients were followed radiographically and clinically for one year. Clinical outcome was assessed with the Constant score. All fractures went on to clinical and radiographic union. Mean time to union was 9.2 weeks (range: 9-16). Only one patient with a 3-part fracture had an asymptomatic malunion and one patient had iatrogenic radial nerve palsy, which spontaneously recovered. In total, 83.3% of the patients had an excellent or good clinical outcome. The Polarus nail appeared in this study as an effective device to treat proximal humeral fractures, with good overall functional results and a low complication rate.     

Isolated tuberosity fractures of the proximal humeral: current concepts

Despite the relatively common occurrence of fractures of the proximal humeral amongst the elderly, the subgroup of isolated greater and lesser tuberosity fractures have remained less well understood. While the majority of two-part fractures result from a standing-height fall onto an outstretched hand, isolated tuberosity fractures are also commonly associated with glenohumeral dislocations or direct impact to the shoulder region. Inasmuch as isolated greater tuberosity fractures are considered uncommon, isolated lesser tuberosity fractures are generally considered exceedingly rare. Non-operative treatment including a specific rehabilitation protocol has been advocated for the majority of non-displaced and minimally displaced fractures, with generally good outcomes expected. The treatment for displaced fractures, however, has included both arthroscopically assisted fixation and open or percutaneous reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The choice of fixation and approach depends not only on fracture type and characteristics, but also on a multitude of patient-related factors. With an expected increase in the level of physical activity across all age groups and overall longer lifespans, the incidence of isolated tuberosity fractures of the proximal humeral is expected to rise. Orthopaedic surgeons treating shoulder trauma should be aware of treatment options, as well as expected outcomes.     

The “Helix Wire”: our experience in the treatment of humeral neck fractures

The management of proximal humeral fractures is still controversial and no single treatment has been unanimously accepted. This paper focuses on displaced two-part fractures to describe the minimally invasive fixation device known as Helix Wire and to propose precise indications for its use, partly on the basis of our previous study of its mechanical properties. Thirty patients with nondisplaced and displaced humeral neck fractures were treated with implantation of a Helix Wire between January 2005 and September 2005. Clinical and radiographic follow-up was carried out at 1, 2, 6 and 12 months. Clinical and functional assessment was performed using the Constant-Murley score. The results at 1 year after surgery were excellent in 7 cases (23.3%), good in 14 cases (46.6%), fair in 8 cases (26.6%) and poor in 1 case (3.3%). On the basis of our precise indications, elderly patients with nondisplaced or displaced two-part fractures of the proximal humerus may achieve good results with minimally invasive implantation of the Helix Wire.     

Semitubular blade plate for fixation in the proximal humerus

Rigid internal fixation is frequently difficult to obtain in the proximal humerus, as osteoporotic bone and small fracture fragments may preclude firm purchase of plates and/or screws. We describe our clinical results using a semitubular plate, fashioned into a blade plate device, for fixation of four displaced fractures and three osteotomies of the proximal humerus. All patients were clinically and radiographically united by 4 months postoperatively and had a functional range of motion. The strength of this fixation was compared to that of an AO "T" plate in an oblique subcapital osteotomy model using 10 matched pairs of human humeri. No statistically significant difference could be demonstrated between the two fixation methods with regard to load to failure, yield load, energy absorbed to failure, or stiffness. As a consequence of these studies, we believe the semitubular blade plate expands the options available for challenging fixations in the proximal humerus.     

Transitory percutaneous pinning in fractures of the proximal humerus

We report 31 patients with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus treated by transitory percutaneous pinning. The Neer fracture classification was used; there were 7 two-part, 20 three-part, and 4 four-part fractures. The Constant score was used for evaluation of the results; the mean score was 80 points. The high mean age of our patients (68 years) diminished the score because of the 25 points attributed to the strength. Avascular necrosis was observed in 5 cases: 2 three-part and 3 four-part fractures. Transitory percutaneous pinning is a good technique for the management of displaced 3-part fractures of the proximal humerus even in the older population, keeping in mind that the shoulder will tolerate a moderate residual deformity without changing the functional outcome significantly. Transitory percutaneous pinning, on the other hand, is not a satisfactory method for the management of 4-part fractures.     

Four part fractures of the proximal humerus

BACKGROUND: Four part fractures of the proximal humerus represent approximately 5% of all proximal humeral fractures. Treatment options for these displaced fractures include nonoperative treatment, open reduction and internal fixation, and arthroplasty. Presently, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal management strategy for this complex injury. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of alternate devices in the management of four part proximal humerus fractures in patients on the risks of reoperation, need for implant removal at 1 year, and pain.     

Osteoporotic fracture treatment

Orthopaedic surgeons frequently have to deal with osteoporotic fractures of the distal radius, hip and proximal humerus. Low bone mineral density is not only associated with an increased fracture risk but also with more fracture displacement and reduction loss. The specific problems and main treatment options for these fragility fractures are reviewed.     

Treatment of acute proximal humerus fractures with an Evans staple

The purpose of this study was to report on radiographic, objective, and functional outcomes in patients with 2- and 3-part proximal humerus fractures treated with an Evans staple. Six patients (three males and three females) who had had acute, displaced proximal humerus fractures requiring operative treatment were identified and their medical records reviewed. There were four 2-part and two 3-part fractures as described by Neer. Mean age was 68.5 (range, 57 to 73) years; mean followup was 71.1 (range, 30 to 98) months. The senior author (T.W.W.) was the treating physician who determined the treatment method. All patients were treated within 2 weeks of injury using an Evans staple (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN), with or without tension band. Clinical outcome measurements were fracture healing, range of motion, complications, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score, and radiologic outcome. All six fractures reached clinical and radiographic union at a mean of 4.2 months without postoperative complications. Two patients required subsequent hardware removal. Mean SPADI score at last followup was 36.8 (good). Average radiologic neck/shaft angle was 110 (range, 92 to 136) degrees. The Evans staple is a valuable implant for treatment of 2- and 3-part proximal humerus fractures requiring a relatively simple surgical implantation and minimal soft tissue dissection.     

Clinical Application of Nail-Plate Fixation in the Treatment of Complex Proximal Third Humeral Fracture: A Case Report and Literature Review

Background

Proximal humeral fractures with increasing incidence are common over the past decades. Among them, the complicated and displaced ones, especially combined with the proximal third humeral shaft fractures, need to be treated surgically. Humeral intramedullary nail and locking plate are the most frequently used options. However, few studies address the application of nail-plate combination for management.

Case presentation

A 49-year-old man struck by a car was referred to our emergency trauma center. The X-ray and three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) showed a complex proximal humeral fracture with proximal third shaft fracture. No evidence of other associated injuries and neurovascular symptom of the injured left upper limb was shown by physical examination. Nail-plate fixation was performed to restore the anatomic integrity of proximal humerus. The injured arm was maintained in a broad arm sling for 14 days after surgery. The active as well as positive movements under the instruction were encouraged as long as the pain could be tolerated from postoperative day 2. One year after the surgery, the fracture was healed, and the patient regained normal shoulder motion. The good clinical outcomes were obtained by application of nail-plate fixation to treat complex proximal third humeral shaft fractures. Thus, this surgical intervention could be performed as an alternative.