Airway function and nasal inflammation in seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma are frequently associated and characterized by a Th2-dependent inflammation. Nasal and bronchial obstruction may be objectively measured. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships among upper and lower airway function and nasal inflammation in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and asthma. METHODS: Twenty out-patients (12 males and eight females, mean age: 23.4+3.6 years) with SAR and asthma were evaluated during the pollen season. All of them showed a moderate-severe grade of nasal obstruction. Total symptom score, rhinomanometry, spirometry, nasal lavage, and nasal scraping were obtained in all subjects. Eosinophils were counted by conventional staining; IL-4 and IFN-gamma were measured by immunoassay on fluids recovered from nasal lavage. RESULTS: Functional parameters, i.e. nasal airflow and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), were correlated with nasal eosinophils (R(2)>0.83, P<0.001). Inflammatory parameters, i.e. eosinophils were correlated with immunological parameters, i.e. IL-4 and IFN-gamma levels (R(2)=0.93, P<0.001). Nasal symptoms were correlated with nasal airflow (rho=-0.71, P< or =0.01) and eosinophils (rho=0.72, P<0.01). Nasal airflow was correlated with FEV(1) (r=0.89, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the close connection between Th2 cytokines and eosinophil infiltration in the nose. There is also clear evidence concerning the relationships between eosinophils infiltration and cytokines levels. Nasal eosinophils can be regarded as the most important predictors of upper and lower airway functions. These findings constitute first evidence of a relationship among nasal Th2-related inflammation and nasal and bronchial airflow in patients with SAR and asthma.     

Nasal obstruction in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: relationships between allergic inflammation and nasal airflow

BACKGROUND: Nasal obstruction is a typical symptom of allergic rhinitis. Allergic rhinitis is characterized by a Th2-dependent inflammation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible relationships between allergic inflammation, including inflammatory cells and cytokine pattern, and nasal airflow in patients with nasal obstruction due to seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Fifty patients (31 males and 19 females, mean age 31.9 +/- 4.8 years) with seasonal allergic rhinitis were evaluated during the pollen season. All of them had moderate to severe nasal obstruction. Total symptom score, rhinomanometry, nasal lavage, and nasal scraping were assessed in all subjects. Inflammatory cells were counted by conventional staining; IL-4, IL-5, IL-8, and IFNgamma were measured by immunoassay on fluids recovered from nasal lavage. RESULTS: Significant positive relationships were demonstrated between eosinophil infiltration and IL-4 levels (p < 0.0001), eosinophils and IL-5 levels (p < 0.0001), and eosinophils and IL-8 levels (p < 0.0001). Significant negative relationships were demonstrated between eosinophil infiltration and IFNgamma levels (p < 0.0001) and eosinophil infiltration and nasal airflow (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the close connection between Th2 cytokines and eosinophil infiltration. In addition, there is clear evidence concerning the relationship between eosinophil infiltration and nasal airflow. These findings constitute first evidence of the relationship between nasal airflow impairment and Th2-related inflammation in seasonal allergic rhinitis.     

Relationships between allergic inflammation and nasal airflow in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is characterized by a T(H)2-dependent inflammation. Nasal obstruction is a typical symptom of allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible relationships among nasal symptoms, allergic inflammation, including inflammatory cells and cytokine pattern, and nasal airflow in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Children with seasonal allergic rhinitis and moderate-severe nasal obstruction were evaluated during the pollen season. Total symptom score, rhinomanometry, nasal lavage, and nasal scraping were evaluated in all patients. Inflammatory cells were counted by conventional staining; interleukin 5 (IL-5) and IL-8 levels were measured by immunoassay on fluids recovered from nasal lavage. RESULTS: Twenty children (11 boys and 9 girls; mean +/- SD age, 12.9 +/- 1.7 years) participated in this study. Eosinophil levels were significantly associated with total symptom score (r = 90.6%, P < .001), IL-5 (r = 94.9%, P < .001), and nasal flow (r = -93.6%, P < .001). No association was elicited with IL-8 (r = 9.4%, P = .69). In a multivariate analysis that included eosinophils, neutrophils, and IL-5, eosinophil levels were shown to be the only independent predictor of nasal flow. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the close connection between T(H)2 cytokines and eosinophil infiltration. In addition, there is clear evidence concerning the relationship among nasal symptoms, eosinophil infiltration, and nasal airflow. These findings constitute evidence of the relationship between nasal airflow impairment and eosinophilic inflammation in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.     

Relationships between allergic inflammation and nasal airflow in children with persistent allergic rhinitis due to mite sensitization

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is associated with Th2-dependent inflammation. Nasal obstruction is the most typical symptom in children with mite allergy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible relationships among nasal symptoms, allergic inflammation, including inflammatory cells and cytokine pattern, and nasal airflow in children with persistent allergic rhinitis because of mite sensitization. METHODS: Twenty children (13 males and seven females, mean age 13.4 +/- 1.6 years) with persistent rhinitis because of mite allergy were evaluated. All of them had moderate-severe grade of nasal obstruction. Total symptom score (TSS), rhinomanometry, nasal lavage, and nasal scraping were obtained in all subjects. Inflammatory cells were counted by conventional staining; interleukin (IL)-5, and IL-8 were measured by immunoassay on fluids recovered from nasal lavage. RESULTS: Eosinophils were significantly associated with TSS (R = 74.4%, P = 0.0002), with IL-5 (R = 90.6%, P < 0.0001) and with nasal flow (R = -69%, P = 0.0007), but not with IL-8 (R = 0.1%, P = 0.995). Eosinophil levels were shown to independently predict nasal flow (P < 0.001), with flow decreasing linearly for increasing eosinophils, together with a significant effect of neutrophils (P = 0.016, linear increase in flow) and a borderline effect of IL-8 (P = 0.063, linear increase in flow). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the close association between IL-5 concentration and eosinophil infiltration. In addition, there is clear evidence concerning the relationship between eosinophil infiltration and nasal airflow. Thus, nasal eosinophils can be regarded as the most important predictor of upper airway function. These findings constitute first evidence of the relationship between nasal airflow impairment and Th2-related eosinophilic inflammation in children with persistent allergic rhinitis because of mite sensitization.     

Changes in airway inflammation following nasal allergic challenge in patients with seasonal rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Seasonal allergic rhinitis could predispose to the development of chronic bronchial inflammation as observed in asthma. However, direct links between nasal inflammation, bronchial inflammation and airway responsiveness in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and without asthma are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to analyse the changes induced by allergic nasal challenge outside the pollen season in airway responsiveness and bronchial inflammation of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Nine patients were evaluated after either grass pollens or placebo nasal challenge in a randomized cross-over double-blinded trial. Nasal parameters were recorded hourly and airway responsiveness was assessed by methacholine challenge. Cytological examinations and cytokine measurements were performed in nasal lavage and induced sputum. Eosinophil activation was investigated by eosinophil-cationic protein expression and secretion. RESULTS: Airway responsiveness was increased after allergic nasal challenge. Total eosinophils and eosinophils expressing eosinophil-cationic protein were increased in induced sputum after allergic nasal challenge. Both eosinophil number and eosinophil-cationic protein concentration in induced sputum were correlated to methacholine responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that eosinophils participate to the bronchial inflammation in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis following allergic nasal challenge outside the pollen season and might explain changes in airway responsiveness.     

Aggravation of bronchial eosinophilia in mice by nasal and bronchial exposure to Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B

BACKGROUND: The role of bacterial enterotoxins like Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B (SEB) in allergic asthma remains unknown. We used a mouse model of airway allergy to study the effects of nasal or bronchial contact with SEB on bronchial allergic inflammation. METHODS: The features of allergic asthma were induced in ovalbumin (OVA)-sensitized mice (days 1-13) by repeated exposures to nebulized OVA (days 33-37). Nasal or bronchial application of SEB was performed on three occasions (days 33-35-37), and the effects on bronchial inflammation, IgE titres and expression levels of mRNA for T helper type 2 cytokines and other inflammatory mediators were evaluated. RESULTS: Both nasal and bronchial SEB enhanced the allergen-induced bronchial inflammation, as reflected by more eosinophilic inflammation in the airway lumen and in bronchial tissue. Aggravation of experimental asthma correlated with higher expression of mRNA for IL-5, IL-4, IFN-gamma, IL-12 p40, eotaxin-1 and TGF-beta in bronchi. In addition, nasal SEB elevated concentrations of IL-4, IL-5 and IFN-gamma in serum and bronchial SEB increased titres of OVA-specific and total IgE in serum. CONCLUSION: Our data illustrate the potential of both nasal as well as bronchial SEB to aggravate several features of allergic asthma in a mouse model.     

Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is characterized by an IgE-dependent inflammation. Nasal obstruction is related to allergic inflammation. Some antihistamines have been demonstrated to be capable of improving this nasal symptom. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate nasal symptoms, nasal airflow, inflammatory cells, and cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), before and after treatment with levocetirizine, desloratadine, or placebo. METHODS: Thirty patients with SAR were evaluated, 27 males and three females (mean age 26.9+/-5.4 years). All of them received levocetirizine (5 mg/day), desloratadine (5 mg/day), or placebo for 2 weeks. The study was double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, and randomized. Total symptom score (TSS) (including: rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing, and nasal obstruction) was assessed before and after treatment. Rhinomanometry, nasal lavage, and nasal scraping were performed in all subjects before and after treatment. Inflammatory cells were counted by conventional staining; IL-4 and IL-8 were measured by immunoassay on fluids recovered from nasal lavage. RESULTS: Levocetirizine treatment induced significant symptom relief (P=0.0009) and improved nasal airflow (P=0.038). Desloratadine also relieved TSS (P=0.01), but did not affect nasal airflow. Levocetirizine significantly reduced eosinophils (P=0.029), neutrophils (P=0.005), IL-4 (P=0.041), and IL-8 (P=0.02), whereas desloratadine diminished IL-4 only (P=0.044). Placebo treatment did not significantly affect any evaluated parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates the effectiveness of levocetirizine in: (i) relieving nasal symptoms, (ii) improving nasal airflow, (iii) reducing leucocyte infiltration, and (iv) diminishing cytokine levels. These findings are the first evidence of the effectiveness of levocetirizine in SAR.     

Eosinophilic inflammation, remodeling of lower airway, bronchial responsiveness and cough reflex sensitivity in non-asthmatic subjects with nasal allergy

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that nasal allergy influences the lower airway inflammation and functions. We elucidated whether nasal allergy would contribute to lower airway inflammation and functions. METHODS: 266 subjects aged 21-39 years were interviewed with special emphasis on history of asthma and nasal allergies (perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) and seasonal allergic rhinitis (Japanese cedar pollinosis; PO)). Symptomatic subject was defined when nasal symptoms were present during a 3-week study period. Pulmonary function, provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (PC20), capsaicin cough threshold defined as capsaicin concentration eliciting 5 or more coughs (C5) and eosinophil percentage in hypertonic saline-induced sputum were measured. RESULTS: Based on the interview, 232 subjects without asthma were divided into symptomatic (n = 25) and asymptomatic (n = 22) PAR, PO on-season (n = 15) and off-season (n = 36), and non-nasal allergy subjects (control) (n = 134). Sputum eosinophils were significantly greater in symptomatic PAR than another four groups (p < 0.01). FEV1/FVC ratio was significantly lower in PAR than control (p < 0.05). Maximum mean expiratory flow was lower in PAR than control (asymptomatic: p < 0.05, symptomatic: p = 0.06). C5 was not different among groups. PAR tended to have a lower PC20 compared to control (symptomatic: p = 0.078; asymptomatic: p = 0.086). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that eosinophilic inflammation occurred in symptomatic period of PAR may contribute to development of lower airway remodeling and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Reversely, PO may not be associated with lower airway eosinophilic inflammation or abnormal bronchial functions. Nasal allergy dose not influence the cough reflex sensitivity.     

Changes in bronchial responsiveness following nasal provocation with allergen.

The relationship between upper airway inflammation and asthma is controversial. In the current study, we sought to investigate the relationship between allergic rhinitis and lower airway dysfunction by performing double-blind, randomized nasal challenges with allergen or placebo. Subjects were selected for a prior history of asthma exacerbations after the onset of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms. After the induction of a marked nasal-allergic reaction (with a technique of nasal provocation that limited allergen delivery to the nose), there were no changes in FEV1, specific conductance, or lung volumes either 30 minutes or 4 1/2 hours after nasal allergen challenge, nor any changes in peak flow rates followed hourly until the next day. However, nasal provocation with allergen resulted in a relative increase in bronchial responsiveness to methacholine compared with that to placebo (p = 0.011 at 30 minutes and p = 0.0009 at 4 1/2 hours after challenge). Our study suggests that, although a nasal-allergic response does not induce airflow limitation of the lower airways, it can alter bronchial responsiveness.     

Retrospective study on fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray efficacy in patients with allergic rhinitis: evaluation of clinical and laboratory parameters

BACKGROUND: In allergic rhinitis, allergenic stimulation causes the release of various mediators that induce symptoms and the development of chronic inflammation, which, in turn, is caused by cells involved in the late phase of inflammation, such as eosinophils. The eosinophils also cause damage at the mucosal level through the secretion of eosinophil cationic protein and other preformed factors contained in their granules. The objective was to verify the efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray in patients with allergic rhinitis; in a retrospective study, we have evaluated mediators of inflammation, making correlations with the clinical symptoms score during and outside the pollen season. METHODS: Forty patients with allergic rhinitis and 15 normal controls were included in our study. Eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil chemotactic activity, and blood and nasal lavage eosinophil count were evaluated as laboratory parameters. RESULTS: We found a significant increase in nasal lavage levels of eosinophil cationic protein in allergic patients, and this was strictly correlated with the clinical symptoms score. No differences were found in the eosinophil count of allergic patients and in the serum eosinophil cationic protein of patients sensitized to seasonal allergens in comparison with normal subjects. By contrast, an increase in serum eosinophil cationic protein level was found in patients sensitized to perennial allergens. After topical administration of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray, a reduction in nasal lavage eosinophil cationic protein secretion was obtained with a reduction of eosinophil chemotactic activity at the local level. This reduction correlated with an improvement of clinical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical improvement and reduction in nasal lavage eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil chemotactic activity after administration of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray further confirms the role of this treatment in allergic rhinitis.     

Comparison of allergen-induced late inflammatory reactions in the nose and in the skin in house dust mite-allergic patients with or without asthma

BACKGROUND: It remains to be established which factors contribute to the occurrence of asthma in allergic individuals. We hypothesized that differences in the late allergic inflammatory reaction to allergen between asthmatic and non-asthmatic house dust mite-allergic individuals might contribute to the difference in the clinical presentation of allergy. AIM: To compare allergen-induced changes in parameters for cellular inflammation during the phase of the late allergic reaction in the skin and nose, in house dust mite-allergic individuals with or without asthma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nasal and dermal allergen challenges with house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) extract were performed in 52 house dust mite-allergic individuals, of whom 26 had mild to moderate persistent asthma and 26 had perennial rhinitis without current or past asthmatic symptoms. Serial nasal lavage samples were analyzed for the presence of inflammatory cells (eosinophils and neutrophils) and soluble markers associated with cellular inflammation [interleukin-5 (IL-5), interleukin-8 (IL-8), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and myeloperoxidase (MPO)]. Macroscopic late phase skin reactions were studied after intracutaneous skin tests with house dust mite extract. RESULTS: Fixed dose nasal allergen provocation elicited a similar degree of immediate allergic reaction as judged by plasma protein exudation and histamine concentrations in asthma and non-asthmatic rhinitis. Subsequently, no differences between groups were found during the phase of the late allergic reaction (4-24 h) in inflammatory cell influx, plasma protein leakage, ECP or MPO. Likewise, there were no differences in levels of chemotactic cytokines IL-5 and IL-8. In agreement with the results of nasal challenge, the late skin reaction after dermal challenge with a fixed allergen dose and after an allergen dose 10,000 times above the skin threshold for an early skin reaction did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: House dust mite-allergic patients with or without asthma have very similar late allergic inflammatory reactions in the skin and in the nose after allergen challenge. Hence, it is unlikely that the occurrence of pulmonary symptoms in asthma is explained by a general tendency of asthmatics to have an enhanced late allergic cellular inflammatory response. Nasal and dermal allergen provocations are adequate models to study allergen-induced inflammation but probably lack the pivotal link which is essential for the development of asthma.     

Relationship between nasal and bronchial responsiveness in perennial allergic rhinitic patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: The nasal and bronchial mucosa present similarities and most patients with asthma also have rhinitis, suggesting the concept of 'one airway one disease'. Although many studies may suggest the relationship between nasal and bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma, few studies have been published which address this question directly. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the relationship between nonspecific nasal and bronchial responsiveness exists in perennial allergic rhinitic patients with asthma. METHODS: Fifty-one perennial allergic rhinitic patients with the definitive or suspected asthma underwent methacholine bronchial provocation tests and nasal histamine challenge tests. A slope of the absolute changes in nasal symptoms score/log concentrations of histamine was calculated by linear regression analysis. A ratio of the final absolute change in nasal symptoms score to the sum of all the doses of histamine given to the subject was also calculated. The degree of bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was categorized as positive bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) if PC(20) (provocative concentration of methacholine resulting in 20% fall in FEV(1)) was <4 mg/ml, borderline BHR if PC(20) was >or=4 but 16 mg/ml. Another index of bronchial responsiveness (BRindex) was calculated as the log [(% decline in FEV(1)/log final methacholine concentration as mg/dl) + 10]. RESULTS: The geometric means of the slope (4.47 vs. 2.95, p < 0.05) and the ratio (1.68 vs. 0.54, p < 0.01) were higher in patients with positive BHR (n = 23) than in patients with negative BHR (n = 19), respectively. The geometric means of the slope (3.50) and the ratio (1.13) in patients with borderline BHR (n = 9) were between the two groups, respectively. In all patients, the log-slope (r = 0.48, p < 0.001) and the log-ratio (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) were correlated well with the BRindex, respectively. Even in allergic rhinitic patients with definitive asthma, the log-slope was correlated with the BRindex (r = 0.39, p < 0.05) or log-PC(20) (r = -0.36, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The nonspecific nasal responsiveness may be related to the nonspecific bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma, which may support the viewpoint that allergic rhinitis and asthma represent a continuum of inflammation involving one common airway.     

A single nasal allergen challenge increases induced sputum inflammatory markers in non-asthmatic subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis: correlation with plasma interleukin-5

BACKGROUND: Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) is a risk factor for asthma in affected individuals. Nasal allergic inflammation enhances bone-marrow eosinophil production, mainly via IL-5, and rhinitis patients have increased airway inflammation during the pollen season. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of nasal allergy on sputum inflammatory markers. METHODS: In an open-labelled, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over study with 16 non-asthmatic SAR patients (median age 25 years, 56% males), the effect of a single nasal allergen challenge performed out of season on induced sputum inflammatory parameters was evaluated. SAR patients were identified by history, skin-prick test and specific IgE. All patients had normal lung function/bronchial hyper-responsiveness out of season and a negative asthma/wheezing history. Sputum cells and supernatant levels of ECP, sICAM, IL-5 and IL-10, and plasma levels of IL-5 and ECP, were measured before and 24 h after nasal allergen challenge. After a washout period of at least 4 weeks, the procedure was repeated with placebo challenge (diluent). RESULTS: Nasal allergen challenge led to an increase in sputum ECP (pre = 60 +/- 12, post = 212 +/- 63 micro g/L, P = 0.02 vs. placebo), and sICAM (4.8 +/- 2.7 to 6.5 +/- 2.9 ng/mL, P = 0.02 vs. placebo), whereas IL-10 decreased after provocation (44 +/- 11 to 29 +/- 6 pg/mL, P = 0.06 vs. placebo). Sputum IL-5 was undetectable in all patients. The absolute number of blood and sputum eosinophils did not change significantly after allergen or placebo challenge (P > 0.07, both comparisons). Plasma levels of IL-5 increased after allergen challenge (8.7 +/- 2.9 to 14.5 +/- 3.9 pg/mL, P = 0.001), and the increase in plasma IL-5 was positively correlated with the rise in sputum ECP in a subgroup of 'responders' (n = 12, r = 0.71, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A single nasal allergen challenge in SAR patients increased markers of allergic inflammation in the lower respiratory tract, possibly via pronounced activation of inflammatory cells through circulating immediate-type reaction cytokines like IL-5. These findings may provide additional explanatory data for the high susceptibility of SAR patients to incident asthma.     

The value and safety of specific nasal provocation in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in mild persistent asthma under inhaled steroid therapy

Although specific nasal provocation is an objective diagnostic test for allergic rhinitis, it can also increase the lower airway responsiveness in asthmatic patients. Our goal was to determine the value and safety of specific nasal provocation test for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in mild persistent asthmatic patients under low-dose inhaled steroid therapy. The study was performed on 32 mild persistent, stable, mite-sensitive allergic asthmatics (group 1), 9 mild persistent nonallergic asthmatics (group 2) and 9 healthy non-smokers (group 3). Nasal symptoms were noted, paranasal sinus computerized tomography (PNCT) and rhinoscopic evaluations were performed. Cases with pathologic-anatomic changes in PNCT and rhinoscopy were excluded. Symptom scoring, flow-volume, peak expiratory flow (PEF), serum and nasal lavage eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and nasal lavage eosinophil counts were performed before mite specific nasal provocation test and at the 0th, 4th and 24th hours following the test. No adverse effects were observed in all diagnostic procedures. Total diagnostic value of nasal symptoms were found to be at 92%, while being 70% for rhinoscopy and 88% for specific nasal provocation test respectively in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in group 1. Statistically significant differences were found between basal nasal lavage eosinophil values (p < 0.001) and ECP levels (p < 0.05) when group 1 was compared with both group 2 and group 3. In the remaining measured values between three groups, no statistically significant differences were found. Specific nasal provocation test is a safe method for mild house dust mite allergic asthma cases under low-dose inhaled steroid therapy, but history of rhinitis might be sufficient for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis.     

Nasal lavage fluid concentrations of eotaxin-1 (CCL11) in naturally occurring allergic rhinitis: relationship to disease activity, nasal luminal eosinophil influx, and plasma protein exudation

BaCKGROUND: Eotaxin-1 (CCL11) is a CC chemokine whose nasal eosinophilic chemotactic activity in vivo and in vitro has been demonstrated primarily using nasal allergen challenge models. The extension of these challenge findings to the in vivo setting has been limited. OBJECTIVE: To obtain nasal lavage fluid from volunteers with perennial and seasonal (in- and out-of-season) allergic rhinitis (AR) and non-atopic non-rhinitic controls for the measurement of eotaxin-1 concentrations and to relate these findings to the symptomatic disease severity, the percentage of lavage eosinophils, and to alpha(2)-macroglobulin (alpha(2)-MG) lavage concentrations, as a marker of vascular permeability and an index of airway inflammation. METHODS: Thirty-seven volunteers with AR (16 seasonal and 21 perennial) and 20 non-atopic non-rhinitic volunteers were recruited and phenotyped. Nasal lavage fluid was obtained by standardized protocol. The nasal lavage fluid concentrations of eotaxin and alpha(2)-MG were measured by ELISA, and differential cell counts performed on cytospins. RESULTS: Eotaxin-1 nasal lavage fluid concentrations were significantly higher in both the perennial and seasonal (in-season) AR groups compared with the controls, and significantly related to the severity of symptom expression and to the percentage of lavage eosinophils. The lavage eosinophil counts were significantly higher in both the symptomatic rhinitis groups compared with the control groups and correlated with the lavage concentrations of alpha(2)-MG. alpha(2)-MG levels were significantly increased in seasonal (in-season) rhinitics compared with both non-atopic controls and seasonal (out-of-season) rhinitics. A significant correlation was observed between the levels of alpha(2)-MG and levels of eotaxin in the symptomatic allergic rhinitic groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study clearly demonstrates the relevance of eotaxin-1 to the pathogenesis of naturally occurring AR.     

Allergen-induced bronchial inflammation in house dust mite-allergic patients with or without asthma

BACKGROUND: It is presently unknown which factors determine the occurrence and persistence of asthma in house dust mite-allergic individuals. The level of allergen-specific IgE antibodies does not seem to be decisive for asthmatic symptoms. Moreover, levels of exposure to mite allergens do not seem to differ significantly between asthmatic and non-asthmatics individuals. AIM: It was hypothesized that the presence or absence of asthmatic symptoms in house dust mite-allergic patients is associated with quantitative or qualitative differences in the cellular bronchial inflammatory response during the late phase of the allergic reaction. This hypothesis was tested in the bronchial allergen challenge model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Whole lung challenges with house dust mite extract were performed in 52 house dust mite-allergic subjects, of whom 26 had asthma and 26 had perennial rhinitis without asthmatic symptoms. Primary outcomes were parameters for bronchial inflammation in serial samples of induced sputum (cell differentials, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), interleukin-8 (IL-8), myeloperoxydase (MPO)). In addition, lung function, non-specific bronchial hyper-responsiveness and serial blood samples (eosinophils and IL-5) were analysed. RESULTS: At baseline sputum eosinophils and ECP were similar in both groups but neutrophils and IL-8 were higher in asthmatics. The early bronchoconstriction after allergen challenge was similar in asthma and non-asthmatic rhinitis (median decrease in FEV1: asthma -31.7% vs. non-asthmatics -29.1%, P > 0.1). The late phase bronchoconstriction was significantly greater in asthma (median decrease in FEV1: asthma -27.6% vs. non-asthmatics -18.9%, P = 0.02). Induction of bronchial hyper-responsiveness was similar in both groups. Bronchial allergen challenge elicited significant increases in sputum eosinophils and ECP, which were indistinguishable for both groups (P > 0.1 and P = 0.07, respectively). In contrast, higher numbers of neutrophils persisted in asthma 24h after challenge and were accompanied by significant increases in IL-8 and MPO, which were absent in non-asthmatics (difference between groups P = 0.007 and P = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: Allergen challenge inducedvery similar increases in eosinophils and ECP in induced sputum in allergic asthmatics and in allergic non-asthmatic patients. The difference in bronchial inflammation between asthma and non-asthmatic rhinitis appeared to be more closely related to indices for neutrophilic inflammation.     

Relationship between nasal hyperreactivity, mediators and eosinophils in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and controls

Background In perennial allergic rhinitis, patients are almost daily exposed to aeroallergens. This ongoing allergic reaction results in increased sensitivity to allergens and non-specific stimuli. It is generally known that inflammatory cells and mediators are involved in the pathogenesis of the allergic reaction. Objectives To study the relationship between nasal hyperreactivity and nasal inflammation during natural allergen exposure. Methods In 48 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and in 11 volunteers a nasal brush, a nasal lavage and a histamine challenge were performed. Nasal inflammation was estimated by the number of eosinophils, levels of albumin, tryptase, prostaglandin D₂ (PGD₂), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and leukotriene C₄/D₄/E₄ (LTC₄/D₄/E₄). Results In contrast to PGD₂ and tryptase, eosinophils (1.9 vs 0%, P = 0.0023), LTC₄/ D₄/E₄ (17.51 vs 1.43pg/mL, P= 0.0001) and albumin (8.61 vs 2.37mg/mL, P= 0.0008) were significantly increased in rhinitis patients as compared with controls. Patients also showed increased responses to nasal histamine challenge assessed using a composite symptom score (21.5 vs 4 points, P=0.0001). The nasal response to histamine was weakly correlated with the total number of eosinophils in the cytospin (correlation coefficient r=0.38, P= 0.009). Conclusion Nasal hyperreactivity is correlated with the percentage of eosinophils in patients with perennial rhinitis. The patients' mediator profiles suggest that eosinophils are important in the ongoing allergic reaction and nasal hyperreactivity.     

Cellular infiltration and cytokine mRNA expression in perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Allergen challenge in allergic rhinitis patients leads to local eosinophilia and Th2-type cytokine expression. Natural exposure to grass pollen is additionally characterized by epithelial mast-cell infiltration. We hypothesized that perennial allergic rhinitis is also associated with T-cell and eosinophil infiltration of the nasal mucosa, local Th2-type cytokine expression, and increased numbers of nasal epithelial mast cells. METHODS: Nasal biopsies from perennial allergic rhinitis patients and controls were analysed by immunocytochemistry for different cell populations and in situ hybridization for cytokine mRNA-expressing cells. RESULTS: Perennial allergic rhinitis was associated with increased numbers of submucosal CD3+ T cells (P=0.05), EG2+ activated eosinophils (P=0.01), and CD68+ macrophages (P=0.01) compared to controls. Epithelial, but not submucosal, tryptase-positive mast cells were also elevated in rhinitics compared to controls (P=0.01). The numbers of cells expressing interleukin (IL)-5 were higher (P=0.01) and the numbers of cells expressing IL-2 were lower (P=0.04) in rhinitic patients than controls. There were no significant differences for either IL-4 or interferon-gamma between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Perennial allergic rhinitis is characterized by mast-cell migration into the epithelium; submucosal infiltration by T cells, eosinophils, and macrophages; and an imbalance in local T-cell cytokine production in favour of enhanced IL-5 and reduced IL-2 expression.     

Eosinophil inflammation of the nasal mucosa in allergic and non-allergic rhinitis measured by eosinophil cationic protein levels in native nasal fluid and serum

Eosinophil inflammation is essential in many cases of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis. Activated eosinophils release toxic granule proteins. In this study, we compared the degree of local nasal and systemic eosinophil activation by the determination of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in serum and native nasal fluid from 119 patients. We found no significant differences in serum ECP levels of the various patient groups. In all patient groups, except in the vasomotor rhinitis group, nasal fluid ECP levels differed significantly from normal controls. We found a nasal fluid ECP (mean ± SEM) of 32·6 ± 81 ng/ml for normals, 106 ± 39·7 for non-rhinitic atopics, 87·6 ± 20·8 ng/ml for patients with chronic non-allergic sinusitis, 101·3 ± 40·4 ng/ml for patients with a history of pollinosis, 150·5 ± 35·1 ng/ml for patients with acute pollinosis, 84·7 ± 24·7 ng/ml for individuals with perennial allergic rhinitis and 112·9 ± 25·6 ng/ml for patients with both perennial and seasonal allergy. Patients with nasal polyps had mean nasal ECP levels of 146·9 ± 57·7 ng/ml in absence of allergy and 147·9 ± 54·9 ng/ ml in the presence of allergy. Nasal ECP was 67·0 ± 22·4 for patients with hyperreactive rhinitis. We found a significant correlation of 0·95 between nasal eosinophils and nasal ECP. Nasal ECP and a subjective symptom score only correlate significantly for chronic sinusitis. We conclude that monitoring native nasal fluid ECP levels may be useful in the diagnosis and mangement of nasal inflammation. Elevated ECP in nasal secretion may originate from upregulated eosinophil degranulation and thus is a marker for local inflammation although not specific for any particular nasal disease.     

IL-15 prevents allergic rhinitis through reactivation of antigen-specific CD8+ cells

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is one of the most common allergic inflammatory diseases characterized by a predominant TH2 response with antigen-specific IgE synthesis. IL-15 plays important roles in activation and maintenance of memory CD8+T cells capable of producing IFN-gamma, which regulates TH2 responses. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the roles of endogenous IL-15 in allergic inflammation, we examined allergic rhinitis in IL-15 knockout (KO) mice sensitized with ovalbumin followed by intranasal rechallenge with ovalbumin. METHODS: IL-15KO mice were sensitized intraperitoneally with ovalbumin/complete Freund's adjuvant on day 0 and ovalbumin/IFA on day 7, and then were intranasally challenged with ovalbumin on days 21, 22, 23, 24, and 25. Nasal symptoms and histologic changes were examined. IgE production and TH2 responses were measured by ELISA. Purified CD8+T cells or recombinant IL-15 were administered into ovalbumin-sensitized mice. RESULTS: The levels of IgE production and TH2 responses in IL-15KO mice were comparable to those in control mice after ovalbumin sensitization. However, sneezing, infiltration of eosinophils into the nasal mucosa, and TH2 cytokine production were aggravated in ovalbumin-sensitized IL-15KO mice after intranasal challenge with ovalbumin. Adoptive transfer of CD8+6 T cells from ovalbumin-sensitized mice suppressed the TH2 responses in mice but not in IL-15KO mice. Administration of IL-15 with ovalbumin significantly prevented the development of allergic rhinitis in ovalbumin-sensitized mice. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate with IL-15KO mice that endogenous IL-15 plays an important role in suppression of allergic rhinitis at effector phase. Intranasal administration of IL-15 is useful as a therapeutic approach to control allergic rhinitis. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Intranasal administration of recombinant IL-15 might become new immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis.