Novel chromosome 16 abnormality--der(16)del(16) (q13)t(16;21)(p11.2;q22)--associated with acute myeloid leukemia.

Inversion of chromosome 16 is a common feature of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) M4, while t(16;21), although also associated with AML, appears to be a separate entity. We present a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who transformed to AML-M1. The karyotype was normal at diagnosis; at 15 months, hematological evidence of transformation was present, and repeat cytogenetics showed a novel rearrangement of one chromosome 16. Two breaks had occurred; one in the short arm at 16p11, with translocation of the segment distal to this onto chromosome 21q, and the other in the long arm at 16q22 with subsequent deletion of the segment from 16q22-->qter. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) confirmed the abnormalities detected by cytogenetics and excluded involvement of the AML1 gene on 21q22. While the 16q22 breakpoint was at the usual site for the inv(16), the 16p11 was not. The patient is more characteristic of t(16;21) than inv(16), and adds to the spectrum of chromosome 16 abnormalities in AML.     

Banding and molecular cytogenetic studies detected a CBFB-MYH11 fusion gene that appeared as abnormal chromosomes 1 and 16 in a baby with acute myeloid leukemia FAB M4-Eo

The acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subtype M4Eo occurs in 5% of all AML cases and is usually associated with either an inv(16)(p13.1q22) or a t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) chromosomal abnormality. At the molecular level, these abnormalities generate a CBFB-MYH11 fusion gene. Patients with this genetic alteration are usually assigned to a low-risk group and thus receive standard chemotherapy. AML-M4Eo is rarely found in infants. We describe clinical, conventional banding, and molecular cytogenetic data for a 12-month-old baby with AML-M4Eo and a chimeric CBFB-MYH11 fusion gene masked by a novel rearrangement between chromosomes 1 and 16. This rearrangement characterizes a new type of inv(16)(p13.1q22) masked by a chromosome translocation.     

Deletion of CBFB in a patient with acute myelomonocytic leukemia (AML M4Eo) and inversion 16

Acute myelomonocytic leukemia with bone marrow eosinophilia (AML M4Eo) is a subtype of AML with distinct morphological features. Inversion (16)(p13.1q22), t(16;16)(p13.1;q22), and del(16)(q22) are nonrandom abnormalities associated with AML M4Eo and a favorable prognosis, compared with the standard risk group for AML. Deletions of the proximal region of the MYH11 gene located at 16p13.1 have been detected in about 20% of patients with inv(16), with an undetermined effect on patient survival. We present the case of a patient with AML M4Eo and inversion 16 with a distal deletion of the CBFB gene at 16q22 detected with fluorescence in situ hybridization. To our knowledge, only one previous report of a similar deletion has appeared in the literature.     

Translocation (8;18;16)(p11;q21;p13). A new variant of t(8;16)(p11;p13) in acute monoblastic leukemia: case report and review of the literature

A complex three-way t(8;18;16)(p11;q21;p13) was detected in a 15-month-old patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The patient had typical clinical manifestation and bone marrow features of AML subtype M5b associated with t(8;16)(p11;p13). Therefore, we believe that the t(8;18;16) is a new variant of t(8;16) related to AML M4/M5. We also review other t(8;16)(p11;p13) variants reported in the literature.     

t(10;16)(q22;p13) and MORF-CREBBP fusion is a recurrent event in acute myeloid leukemia

Recently, it was shown that t(10;16)(q22;p13) fuses the MORF and CREBBP genes in a case of childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML) M5a, with a complex karyotype containing other rearrangements. Here, we report a new case with the MORF-CREBBP fusion in an 84-year-old patient diagnosed with AML M5b, in which the t(10;16)(q22;p13) was the only cytogenetic aberration. This supports that this is a recurrent pathogenic translocation in AML.     

An unusual three-way translocation t(21;8;1)(q22;q22;q32) in a case of acute myeloid leukemia (M2)

Variant forms of the classic translocation t(8;21) are uncommon and account approximately 3% of all t(8;21)(q22;q22) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. These forms involve chromosomes 8, 21, and other chromosomes. Here we report a Tunisian patient with a complex rearrangement t(21;8;1)(q22;q22;q32) revealed by conventional chromosomal study at diagnosis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization study revealed the presence of the AML1-ETO chimeric gene on the derivative chromosome 8. To the best of our knowledge, this is the second case of t(21;8;1) of AML-M2 reported in the literature with the involvement of the same breakpoint at 1q32. This illustrates that this complex translocation is rarely encountered in AML and reinforces the fact that this region may harbour a critical gene candidate that may play an important role in the pathogenesis of AML. More cases are needed to elucidate its clinical features and prognosis.     

inv(16)(p13q22) in chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast phase: a clinicopathologic, cytogenetic, and molecular study of five cases

Blast phase (BP) in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) frequently is accompanied by cytogenetic abnormalities in addition to t(9;22)(q34;q11.2). We describe 5 patients with CML in blast phase (CML-BP) in which t(9;22) and inv(16)(p13q22) were identified by conventional cytogenetics, with confirmation of BCR-ABL and CBFss-MYH11 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The morphologic findings at the time of BP resembled de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) carrying inv(16)(p13q22), with abnormal eosinophils in the bone marrow and monocytosis in the peripheral blood in all cases. In 1 patient, inv(16)(p13q22) and abnormal eosinophils were detected in the bone marrow 2 months before CML-BP. The clinical course of these patients was similar to patients with CML-BP without evidence of inv(16)(p13q22). These cases illustrate that inv(16)(p13q22) is a form of cytogenetic evolution that rarely occurs in patients with CML at the time of BP. In this setting, unlike de novo AML, inv(16)(p13q22) in CML-BP is not associated with a favorable prognosis.     

Novel t(8;17)(q23;q24.2) and t(9;22)(p24.1;q12.2) in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia AML-M7 subtype in an adult patient

The strong association of diagnostic karyotype with clinical outcome has made cytogenetics one of the most valuable diagnostic and prognostic tools for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The subtype M7 is a rare disease of the megakaryoblastic lineage and is mostly associated with complex abnormal karyotype. We describe the clinical, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and cytogenetic findings in the case of a 39-year-old man with acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AML-M7). Cytogenetic analysis revealed two translocations, t(8;17)(q23;q24.2) and t(9;22)(p24.1;q12.2), at presentation; to our knowledge, this combination is a novel finding for acute megakaryoblastic leukemia. The patient responded to induction therapy, achieving complete remission after 9 days of therapy.     

Quantitative acute leukemia cytogenetics.

Using literature data on cytogenetic abnormalities in 3,612 cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 1,551-cases of acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), we have attempted to quantify the information value of finding the typical ALL- and AML-associated chromosome aberrations. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of finding or not finding a given aberration were calculated for several diagnostic scenarios: for the differential diagnosis between ALL and AML when the patient is known to have acute leukemia, for the differential diagnosis among AML FAB subtypes in a patient with known AML, and for the differential diagnosis between ALL FAB subtypes in a patient with known ALL. The specificities were generally high, close to 1. The highest sensitivities in AML were found for +8, t(15;17)(q22;q11), t(8;21)(q22;q22), and -7 (all greater than 0.1), and in ALL for t(9;22)(q34;q11), t(4;11)(q21;q23), and +21 (again all greater than 0.1). In the AML subtypes, the highest sensitivities were 0.89 for t(15;17)(q22;q11) in M3, followed by 0.40 for t(8;21)(q22;q22) in M2, 0.30 for inv(16)(p13q22)/del(16)(q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22) in M4, and 0.16 for t(9;11)(p21;q23) in M5. In the ALL subtypes, the highest sensitivities were 0.71 and 0.11 for t(8;14)(q24;q32) and t(8;22)(q24;q11), respectively, in L3, 0.23 for t(9;22)(q34;q11) in L2, and 0.18 and 0.13 for +21 and t(4;11)(q21;q23), respectively, in L1. The highest (1.0) positive predictive values in the AML versus ALL comparison were found for t(1;3)(p36;q21), inv(3)(q21q26), t(6;9)(p23;q34), t(7;11)(p15;p15), t(8;16)(p11;p13), t(8;21)(q22;q22), t(15;17)(q22;q11), and, as sole anomalies, for +4, +9, and +11. In the reverse comparison, ALL versus AML, positive predictive values of 1.0 were found for t(1;14)(p32-34;q11), dup(I)(q12-21q31-32), t(2;8)(p12;q24), t(8;14)(q24;q32), t/dic(9;12)(p11-12;p11-13), t(10;14)(q24;q11), and t(11;14)(p13;q11). Among the AML subgroups, the highest predictive values were: 1.0 for M3 if t(15;17), 0.91 for M2 if t(8;21), 0.86 for M4 if inv/del(16)/t(16;16), and 0.82 for M5 if t(9;11). Among the ALL subtypes, positive predictive values of greater than 0.8 were reached only for the L3-associated aberrations t(2;8) (1.0), t(8;14) (0.95), t(8;22) (0.87), and dup(I) (0.80). The highest negative predictive values were in AML 0.98 that the disease is not M3 if t(15;17) is not found, and in ALL 0.96 that the patient does not have L3 if a t(8;14) is not detected.     

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21)(q22;q22) relapsing as AML with t(3;21)(q26;q22)

We here report on an 48-year-old male patient with a primary diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-M2 with t(8;21)(q22;q22), who developed complete hematologic and molecular remission after induction chemotherapy. Thirteen months later, he relapsed and showed an AML-M2 with t(3;21)(q26;q22). Retrospectively, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for AML1-EVI1 and EVI1 overexpression was performed on bone marrow and peripheral blood samples taken at diagnosis and during the first year after the first manifestation of AML to quantify the AML1-EVI1-positive clone. In a bone marrow sample taken 25 days from diagnosis, PCR for AML1-EVI1 was negative, and EVI1 expression, as assessed by quantitative real-time PCR, was within the same range as that of healthy controls. These data suggest that this patient developed a secondary therapy-related AML rather than a relapse.     

MLL rearrangement with t(6;11)(q15;q23) as a sole abnormality in a patient with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: conventional cytogenetics, FISH, and multicolor FISH analyses for detection of rare MLL-related chromosome abnormalities

We report a rare case of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(6;11)(q15;q23) in a 50-year-old female showing a poor prognosis. Bone marrow biopsy revealed markedly hypercellular marrow with infiltrates of myeloblasts, consistent with AML-M2 morphology. The karyotype of this patient was 46,XX,t(6;11)(q15;q23) in all analyzed cells, and the results of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and multi-color FISH analysis confirmed this unique MLL rearrangement as a sole abnormality. To our knowledge, t(6;11)(q13 approximately q15;q23) is the most rare type of MLL rearrangement involving the long arm of chromosome 6. Only two cases with t(6;11)(q13;q23) and three cases with t(6;11)(q15;q23) have been reported, but detailed clinical or laboratory data were not available. From this report, it is apparent that in a cytogenetic laboratory, the accurate detection of a rare type of MLL rearrangement is very important in the differential diagnosis, prompt treatment, and prediction of prognosis of leukemias.     

Deletion of 16q11 is a recurrent cytogenetic aberration in acute myeloblastic leukemia during disease progression.

Abnormalities of chromosome 16 other than inv(16)(p13q22), t(16;16)(p13;q22), and del(16)(q22) have not been fully characterized in acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We report here the first case of AML with del(16)(q11) as a sole abnormality. A 53-year-old woman was initially diagnosed as MDS, refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation with normal karyotype. After sixteen months, the disease progressed to overt AML-M1. Myeloblasts were positive for CD13, CD33, and CD34, but negative for HLA-DR. Chromosome analyses of the bone marrow cells showed 46,XX,del(16)(q11) in all metaphase spreads. Multicolor spectral karyotyping also confirmed that del(16)(q11) was not derived from a cryptic translocation, but a simple deletion. Our results, together with three previously reported cases, suggest that del(16)(q11) may be one of the recurrent aberrations in AML and that it could be associated with clonal evolution or disease progression.