Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus azathioprine (AZA) in pancreas transplantation: a single-center experience

AIM: Advances in immunosuppression and careful monitoring for rejection are largely responsible for improved results in pancreas transplantation. We conducted a retrospective study to establish the effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) instead of azatioprine (AZA) in pancreas transplantation and to assess adverse effects in the two different immunosuppressive regimes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Since 1991, 27 pancreas transplantations were performed in 25 patients at our Institute. For induction therapy, immunosuppressant protocol consisted of quadruple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine, steroids, antilymphocyte globulin and AZA in 13 patients or MMF in 12 patients respectively. RESULTS: Acute rejection occurred in 76% of patients in the AZA group compared with 53% in the MMF group. Steroid-resistant rejection was observed in 7% in the MMF group compared to 38% of patients on AZA (p < 0.01). Two kidney grafts were lost due to acute rejection in the AZA group, one pancreas was lost due to acute rejection and one to chronic rejection in the MMF group. There were no significant differences in CMV infection. Severe fungal infections were noted in 2 patients treated with MMF. Malignancy occurred in 1 patient (pancreas graft lymphoma) in MMF. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, patients treated with MMF required less frequent and less intensive treatment for acute rejection. However, its short- and long-term side effects should be further investigated.     

Use of basiliximab with mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Randomized, placebo-controlled studies have determined that administration of basiliximab (chimeric IL-2 receptor antagonist) decreases the acute rejection rate in kidney transplantation when used in combination with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids. We report our experience using basiliximab with mycophenolate mofetil, a calcineurin inhibitor, and steroids in kidney transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 127 patients who received their first kidney transplant between September 1, 1998, and December 30, 2000, including 59 who received basiliximab (22 living and 37 cadaveric donor recipients) and the 68 that did not receive this antibody (31 living and 37 cadaveric donor recipients). The groups were demographically comparable for risk factors such as race, peak of panel-reactive antibody, delayed graft function, donor age, and cold ischemia time. The analysis assessed serum creatinine levels, acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease incidence as well as patient and graft survival at 6 months. RESULTS: Serum creatinine levels were 3 +/- 3.1 and 2.6 +/- 2.5 mg/dL (P =.346) at discharge, 1.5 +/- 0.6 and 1.7 +/- 1.1 mg/dL (P =.098) at 1 month, and 1.5 +/- 0.7 and 1.6 +/- 0.7 mg/dL (P =.454) at 6 months posttransplantation for patients treated with versus without basiliximab, respectively. Only one episode of acute rejection was seen among patients treated with basiliximab within 1 month posttransplantation versus three episodes among patients treated without basiliximab (P =.382). Three patients (5.1%) treated with basiliximab and two patients (2.9%) treated without basiliximab developed acute rejection within 6 months posttransplantation (P =.536). Patient and graft survivals at 6 months posttransplantation were not significantly different between patients treated with versus without basiliximab (100% and 100% versus 100% and 98.3%, respectively). There was no increased incidence of cytomegalovirus infection with the use of basiliximab (5.1% vs 5.9%, P =.844). There was only one case of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease within 6 months posttransplantation in a patient treated without basiliximab. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the routine addition of basiliximab to a mycophenolate mofetil-based regimens does not appear to be warranted. A larger prospective randomized study with longer follow-up is needed to confirm these results.     

Use of basiliximab and daclizumab in kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation represents a major medical victory in patients with whom dialysis and medical therapy have failed. To increase survival rates and optimize the use of limited organs, both patient care and immunosuppression therapy must be improved. Reduction in rejection episodes or severity of rejection may ultimately improve long-term allograft survival. Traditional engineered monoclonal antibodies have been associated with severe cytokine release reactions and an increased risk of opportunistic infections. Basiliximab and daclizumab are chimeric and humanized monoclonal antibodies which inhibit thymus-dependent lymphocyte proliferation. Interleukin-2 also affects the proliferation of natural killer cells, macrophages and monocytes, bursa-equivalent lymphocytes, epidermal dendritic cells, and lymphokine-activated killer cells. Interleukin-2 receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection without increasing the incidence of opportunistic infections or malignancy. Further studies are needed to evaluate the overall effect of these agents on long-term patient and allograft survival.     

Pinpoint targeted immunosuppression: anti-CD20/MMF desensitization with anti-CD25 in successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation without splenectomy

Abstract: Background: In Japan, ABO‐incompatible (ABO‐I) kidney transplantation began in 1989; these transplantations have flourished because of the lack of cadaveric donors, and more than 600 cases were performed up to 2004. Splenectomy has been considered to be necessary for successful ABO‐I kidney transplantation, and the majority of pre‐conditioning protocols include splenectomy in Japan. However, we have lost some grafts due to antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) accompanying explosive elevation of anti‐A/B antibody (Ab) titer even though the patients had a low pre‐operative Ab titer. Patients and methods: We utilized two doses of anti‐CD20, rituximab, simply combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/low‐dose steroid desensitization started 1 month before surgery in ABO‐I kidney transplantation. Two sessions of pre‐operative Ab removal by double filtration plasmapheresis or plasma exchange were carried out. We performed six ABO‐I kidney transplantations without splenectomy. Anti‐A/B Ab titers were more than 16 to 32 times before treatment. We did not plan any post‐operative repeated Ab removal or intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG). Results: Pre‐operative anti‐A/B Ab titers were successfully reduced to less than eight times in all cases. Except for one case in which we had to remove the graft due to aspiration pneumonia and methicillin‐resistant staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) sepsis, the other five cases did not experience antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR). An additional session of post‐operative Ab removal and/or IVIG was not necessary. In all patients, B cells (CD19⁺, CD20⁺, CD21⁺) and activated T cells (CD25⁺) were selectively suppressed, although CD3⁺, CD4⁺and CD8⁺ cell populations remained stable, thus we call our protocol “pinpoint targeted immunosuppression.” Plasma immunoglobulin level was also successfully suppressed, especially after 6 weeks of surgery. Conclusion: Anti‐CD20/MMF desensitization is safe and allows successful ABO‐I kidney transplantation without splenectomy.     

Outcome of kidney transplantation from nonheart-beating versus heart-beating cadaveric donors

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess outcomes of kidney transplants from nonheart-beating (NHB) compared with heart-beating (HB) cadaveric donors with meta-analytical techniques. METHODS: A literature search was performed for studies comparing kidney transplants from NHB vs. HB cadaveric donors between 1992 and 2005. The following outcomes were evaluated: warm and cold ischemia times, primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, length of hospital stay, acute graft rejection, patient and graft survival, and post-transplant serum creatinine. RESULTS: Eighteen comparative studies of 114,081 patients matched the selection criteria; 1,858 received kidney from NHB and 112,223 from HB donor. Warm ischemia time was significantly longer for the NHB group by 24 min (P<0.001). Cold ischemia time was similar for the two groups (P=0.97). The incidence of primary nonfunction and delayed graft function was 2.4 times (P<0.001) and 3.6 times (P<0.001) greater, respectively, in the NHB group. Length of hospital stay was longer for the NHB group by 4.6 days (P<0.001). The 6-month, 2-year, and 5-year patient survival were similar between the two groups. The incidence of acute rejection was similar between the two groups whereas the initial graft survival advantage in favor of the HB group diminished gradually over the course of time. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for the recipient serum creatinine levels at 3 and 12 months after transplantation. CONCLUSION: NHB donors carry the potential of expanding the cadaveric kidney pool. Although, transplants from NHB donors are associated with a greater incidence of early adverse events, long-term outcomes appear comparable with those of transplants from HB donors.     

A prospective randomized trial of low-dose versus high-dose steroids in cadaveric renal transplantation

Low-dose steroid regimens, in combination with azathioprine, have become increasingly common for immunosuppression of renal transplant recipients. The change from conventional high-dose steroid regimens was prompted by the results of several prospective trials that showed similar graft survivals with high-dose and low-dose steroids, but a lower incidence of steroid-induced complications in low-dose-steroid--treated patients. However, the number of patients entered into the trials was small, and consequently there remained a possibility that a clinically relevant difference in graft survival could have remained undetected. A multi-center prospective trial was performed to compare graft survival with high-dose (91 patients) and low-dose (98 patients) oral steroids in combination with azathioprine. There was significantly worse graft survival in the low-dose group. The difference was largely due to a poor graft survival in patients receiving low-dose steroids and azathioprine less than 1.75 mg/kg/day. Graft survivals were similar in the high-dose and low-dose steroid patients who received azathioprine doses of greater than 1.75 mg/kg/day. The results indicate that the combination of low doses of both steroids and azathioprine provides inadequate immunosuppression in renal transplantation, although higher doses of azathioprine allow the use of low-dose steroids without significantly more graft losses than with high-dose steroids.     

Infectious complications with the use of cyclosporine versus azathioprine after cadaveric kidney transplantation

Infectious complications within 1 year of cadaveric kidney transplantation were compared in 45 patients treated with azathioprine, prednisone, and antilymphocyte globulin and 38 patients treated with cyclosporine and prednisone. Although there was no difference in the 1 year patient or graft survival rate, cyclosporine-treated patients had significantly fewer wound infections, infection-related transplant nephrectomies, and infection-related graft failures than azathioprine-treated patients. The cyclosporine-treated diabetic recipients had more nonviral pneumonias and opportunistic infections but fewer cases of infection-related transplant nephrectomy than did the azathioprine-treated diabetic patients. Our data suggest cyclosporine is associated with reduced infectious morbidity after cadaveric kidney transplantation in nondiabetic patients.     

Single bolus antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab induction in kidney transplantation with cyclosporine triple immunosuppression: efficacy and safety

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective randomized study was to examine the effect of induction immunosuppression and low initial cyclosporine (CsA) on the onset of graft function and its long-term consequences. METHODS: During 1999-2001, 155 patients were randomized to single 9 mg/kg dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-Fresenius (group A) or two 20-mg doses of basiliximab (group B) with reduced dose CsA or conventional CsA triple therapy without induction (group C). RESULTS: Delayed function (DGF) was lower in group A than in groups B or C (5.7% vs. 24.1% and 15.9%, P<0.025) and need of dialysis was less in groups A and B compared to C (10.3 and 10.4 vs. 20.0 days, P<0.05). Acute rejections occurred in 11.3%, 12.1% and 20.5%, and the mean (median) time to rejection was 16 (13), 97 (46) and 101 (35) days in groups A, B, and C, respectively (P<0.005). One-and 5-year graft survivals (GS) were 98.1% and 90.6% (group A), 96.6% and 96.6% (group B), and 93.2% and 84.1% (group C). Five-year GS was significantly better in group B than in group C (P<0.05). The death censored 5-year GS in groups A, B, and C were 94.3%, 96.6%, and 90.0% (P=NS). Single high-dose ATG induction was associated with hemodynamic and pulmonary disturbances without, however, serious or long-term consequences. CONCLUSIONS: ATG induction significantly reduced DGF. Both induction regimens together with low initial CsA led to significantly less posttransplant dialysis and excellent survival. The high dose ATG was associated with significant hemodynamic and pulmonary side effects during drug infusion.     

肾脏移植15年回顾

我院１９９２年７月－１９９３年３月共４９５份病理诊断为湿疣（５２份）、鳞状乳头状瘤病和非特异性炎或增生性病变的外阴、阴道及宫颈赘生物的活检标本，分别采用免疫组化ＡＢＣ法和核酸斑点杂交技术检测人乳头状瘤病毒的衣壳抗原和ＤＮＡ。在湿疣、鳞状乳状状瘤病和非特异性炎或增生性病变中，ＨＰＶ－Ａｇ阳性检分别为６９．２３％、０．００％和０．００％；ＨＰＶ－ＤＮＡ阳性检出率分别为８４．６２％、１１．３８％和３．３     

Induction therapy with basiliximab versus Thymoglobulin in African-American kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the use of antilymphocyte induction therapy in African-American (AA) renal transplant recipients reduces the risk of acute rejection (AR) and improves graft survival. It is not clear whether the efficacy of basiliximab (BSX) is different from that of Thymoglobulin (ATG) in this regard. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the effect of induction therapy with BSX versus ATG in 88 AA renal allograft recipients receiving transplants at our center between July 2001 and June 2003 and followed for 19+/-7 months. All patients were maintained on mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and either tacrolimus or sirolimus. Study endpoints included patient and graft survival, graft function, and incidence of AR and cytomegalovirus infection. Regression models were used to evaluate the independent effect of each induction agent on these endpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients received ATG, and 52 received BSX. The groups were comparable with regard to donor race and age, and recipient sex, body mass index, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching, and hepatitis C virus serostatus. The ATG group was younger, more likely to receive retransplant, had longer duration of end-stage renal disease and higher panel reactive antibody, and was less likely to receive live-donor organs. However, after adjusting for all these variables, graft outcomes, as well as renal function, were comparable between the two induction groups. We found that the degree of HLA mismatch, delayed graft function, and AR were the only significant predictors of graft loss. CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that the choice of induction agent may not have a major impact on graft outcomes in AA renal-allograft recipients.     

AZA/Tacrolimus Is Associated with Similar Outcomes as MMF/Tacrolimus among Renal Transplant Recipients

There have been several retrospective studies indicating benefits associated with mycophenalate mofetil (MMF) compared to azathioprine (AZA) for renal transplant recipients. However, these analyses evaluated outcomes prior to changes in utilization patterns of concomitant immunosuppression. Recent prospective trials have indicated similar outcomes among patients treated with MMF and AZA. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes in a broad group of patients in the more recent era. We evaluated adult solitary renal transplant recipients from 1998 to 2006 with the national SRTR database. Primary outcomes were time to patient death and graft loss, complications and renal function. Models were adjusted for potential confounding factors, propensity scores and stratified between higher/lower risk transplants and concomitant immunosuppression. Adjusted models indicated a modest risk among AZA patients for graft loss (AHR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.07–1.20); however, this was not apparent among AZA patients also treated with tacrolimus (AHR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.85–1.11]. One-year acute rejection rates were reduced for patients on MMF versus AZA (10 vs. 13%, p < 0.01); there were no statistically significant differences of malignancies, renal function or BK virus at 1 year. The primary findings suggest the association of MMF with improved outcomes may not be apparent in patients also receiving tacrolimus.     

One-year results of basiliximab induction and tacrolimus associated with sequential steroid and MMF treatment in pediatric kidney transplant recipient

We report the 1-year results with a triple immunosuppressive regimen in pediatric recipients of a first kidney transplant, in order to evaluate its safety and efficacy in the prevention of acute rejection and in the reduction of steroid side effects. The immunosuppression is as follows: (i) basiliximab (20 mg if body weight >30 kg; 10 mg if < 30 kg) is given pretransplant and at day 4; (ii) tacrolimus (Tac) is administered in order to obtain blood trough levels of 10-20 and 5-10 ng/ml during and after the first 2 months post-transplant, respectively; (iii) steroids are tapered during the first 6 months and then replaced by mycophenolate mofetil (depending on previous rejection episodes, infection status and the result of a routine biopsy) at a dosage of 4-600 mg/m(2) body surface area. Fifty-three children (median age 13 years, range 2-20) have entered this protocol. One-year patient and kidney survival are 100% and 94% respectively. During the first year a total of nine rejections in seven patients (13% of the cohort study) occurred, all but one responsive to steroids. Renal function was satisfactory throughout the first year (mean CrCl was 63.8 +/- 18 and 60.9 +/- 15.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at 6 and 12 months respectively). Subclinical signs of rejection were absent in more than 80% of biopsies (grade I Banff) at 6 months (n = 47); at the 12th month biopsy (n = 42) score I was stable in 20 patients (16 after stopping steroids) and had worsened in eight biopsies (six after stopping steroids). Major complications were insulin-dependent diabetes in three (5.6%) children with the need of insulin for a mean of 3 months; transient hyperglycemia (11 patients), treated with a dietary regimen, symptomatic viral infections (in 11 patients: two parvovirus B19, three cytomegalovirus and two Epstein-Barr virus systemic infections, three interstitial pneumonia, two BK nephritis). Tac doses more than 0.3-0.4 mg/kg/day are at significantly higher risk of viral infection. In conclusion, this immunosuppressive regimen is associated with a low percentage of clinical (13%) and subclinical rejections, but with a relatively high number of infections, prevented by a reduction in Tac doses (<0.3 mg/kg/day) during the first 2 months after transplantation. The assessment of steroid withdrawal needs a longer follow-up.     

肝移植后应用巴利昔单抗同时撤减激素的免疫抑制治疗方案

目的 探讨肝移植后加用巴利昔单抗的情况下采用撤减激素的免疫抑制方案的临床效果.方法 首次肝移植患者60例,术后采用他克莫司和霉酚酸酯预防排斥反应,并分别于术中和术后第4天各给予1剂巴利昔单抗,其中20例不用激素,40例仅术中开放血流前使用甲泼尼龙1次,术后不再使用激素,此60例为撤减激素组.以同期完成的、术后采用含甲泼尼龙的免疫抑制方案的60例肝移植患者为对照组.观察两组患者及移植物的存活情况以及急性排斥反应、巨细胞病毒磷蛋白(CMV pp65)阳性及术后新发糖尿病的发生情况.结果 术后随访12个月,不用激素者、单次使用激素者及对照组的患者存活率分别为95.0%、92.5%和91.7%,移植肝存活率分别为95%、90%和90%,急性排斥反应发生率分别为10.0%、12.5%及11.7%,三者间两两比较,患者存活率、移植肝存活率和急性排斥反应发生率的差异均无统计学意义.不用激素者、单次使用激素者及对照组的CMV pp65阳性率分别为15.0%、20.0%和43.3%,新发糖尿病发生率分别为5.0%、7.5%和30.0%,撤减激素组明显低于对照组(P<0.05).结论 肝移植后,在加用巴利昔单抗的情况下采用撤减激素的免疫抑制方案,并不增加排斥反应的发生率,并能降低CMV pp65阳性率和新发糖尿病发生率.