A Prospective Randomized Study of Irinotecan (CPT-11), Leucovorin (LV) and 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) versus Leucovorin and 5-Fluorouracil in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the activity and toxicity of an irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) combination with a standard regimen of 5FU and LV, in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

One hundred and sixty patients were randomized; 80 patients (group A) received LV 20 mg/m² bolus i.v. and 5FU 425 mg/m² bolus i.v. on days 1-5, every 28 days; 80 patients (group B) received CPT-11 80 mg/m² (30-90 min i.v. infusion), followed by LV 20 mg/m² bolus i.v. and 5FU 425 mg/m² bolus i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36, every 8 weeks.

The overall response rate was 30% and 47.5% in groups A and B respectively. Progression-free survival was significantly higher in the triple-drug combination arm (median 7.5 vs. 4.5 months; p= 0. 0335). However, overall survival did not differ significantly between the two arms (15 months vs. 14 months for the groups B and A respectively; p=0.3531). The main grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (19%, in group A vs. 35% in group B; p=0.032) and mucositis (2% vs. 14%; p=0.017).

The regimen containing irinotecan showed activity in advanced colorectal cancer. The overall safety data confirm this combination as a well-tolerated treatment.     

Biweekly irinotecan or raltitrexed plus 6S-leucovorin and bolus 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal carcinoma: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase II-III randomized trial.

Purpose:The aim of this randomised trial was to evaluate theactivity and toxicity of a biweekly regimen including 6S-leucovorin-modulated5-fluorouracil (LFA–5-FU), combined with either irinotecan (CPT-11 +LFA–5-FU) or raltitrexed (Tomudex®) (TOM + LFA–5-FU), inadvanced colorectal cancer patients, and to make a preliminary comparison ofboth these experimental regimens with a biweekly administration ofLFA–5-FU modulated by methotrexate (MTX + LFA–5-FU). Patients and methods:One hundred fifty-nine patients withadvanced colorectal carcinoma previously untreated for the metastatic disease(34 of them previously exposed to adjuvant 5-FU) were randomly allocated toreceive: CPT-11, 200 mg/m² i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA,250 mg/m² i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 850 mg/m² s i.v. bolus(arm A); TOM, 3 mg/m² i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250mg/m² i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 1050 mg/m² i.v. bolus (armB); or MTX, 750 mg/m² i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250mg/m² i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 800 mg/m² i.v. bolus (armC). Courses were repeated every two weeks in all arms of the trial. Responserate (RR) was evaluated after every four courses. The sample size was definedto have an 80% power to detect a 35% RR for each experimentaltreatment, and to show a difference of at least 4% in RR with thestandard treatment if the true difference is 15% or more. Results:The RRs were: 34% (95% confidence interval(95% CI): 21%–48%) in arm A, including 3 completeresponses (CRs) and 15 partial responses (PRs), 24% (95% CI:14%–38%) in arm B, including 2 CRs and 11 PRs, and24% (95% CI: 14%–38%), with 2 CRs and 11PRs, in arm C. After a median follow-up time of 62 (range 18–108) weeks,the median time to progression was 38, 25, and 27 weeks for arm A, B, and C,respectively. With 94 patients still alive, the one-year probability ofsurvival was 61%, 54%, and 59%, respectively. WHO grade3 or 4 neutropenia and diarrhoea affected 46% and 16%,respectively, of patients treated with CPT-11 + LFA–5-FU. Medianrelative dose intensity over eight cycles (DI₈) was 78% forCPT-11 and 82% for 5-FU. Severe toxicities of TOM + LFA–5-FU wereneutropenia (16%) and diarrhoea (16%), but median relativeDI₈ was 93% for TOM, and 82% for 5-FU. Conclusions:CPT-11 + LFA–5-FU compares favorably in termof activity and toxicity with other combination regimens including CPT-11 andcontinuous infusional 5-FU. The hypothesis of a RR 15% higher than theMTX + LFA–5-FU treatment can not be ruled out after this interimanalysis. The TOM + LFA–5-FU regimen showed a RR and a toxicity profilevery close to the MTX + LFA–5-FU combination, and dose not deservefurther evaluation in advanced colorectal cancer patients.     

Schedule specific biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: A randomized study

Background:We have recently suggested that bolus 5-fluorouracil(5-FU) may work via a RNA directed mechanism while continuous infusion 5-FUmay kill cells via a thymidylate synthase related pathway. It may thus bepossible to selectively modulate each schedule biochemically. We have comparedan alternating regimen of bolus and continuous infusion 5-FU, selectivelymodulated for the schedule of administration, with modulated bolus 5-FU inadvanced colorectal cancer patients. Patients and methods:Two hundred fourteen patients from nineteenItalian centers were randomized to the control arm consisting of biweeklycycles of MTX, 200 mg/m² on day 1, followed by bolus 5-FU 600mg/m² on day 2 and 6-S-leucovorin rescue, or to the experimentalarm consisting of two biweekly cycles of the same regimen as in the controlarm alternated to three weeks of continuous infusion 5-FU (200mg/m² day) + weekly bolus 6-S-leucovorin, 20 mg/m². Results:Nine CR and twenty-seven PR were obtained on one hundredeleven evaluable patients treated in experimental arm (RR = 32%,95% confidence interval (95% CI): 24%–42%),while two CR and eleven PR were observed among one hunderd three evaluablepatients in control arm (RR = 13%, 95% CI:7%–21%). WHO grade 3–4 toxicity occurred in13% of cycles of experimental arm and in 8% of cycles in controlarm. The PFS was significantly longer in experimental arm (6.2 vs. 4.3 months,odds ratio 0.66, P = 0.003), while the overall survival was similarin both arms (14.8 months in experimental arm vs. 14.1 months in control arm);quality of life was similar as well. Eighty percent of patients receivingsecond-line chemotherapy in control arm were treated with continuous infusion5-FU. Conclusions:Alternating, schedule-specific biochemical modulationof FU is more active than MTX 5-FU as first-line treatment of advancedcolorectal cancer. However, the overall survival was similar suggesting thatalternating bolus and infusional 5-FU upfront may be as effective as givingthem in sequence as first- and second-line treatment.     

A multicenter phase II study of irinotecan (CPT-11) alternated with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose In this multicenter phase II study the efficacy and safety of the alternating schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11) with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) were assessed as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).Patients and methods Enrolled in the study were 43 patients with advanced CRC. They received CPT-11 350 mg/m² i.v. on day 1, alternating with LV 20 mg/m² i.v. and 5-FU 425 mg/m² i.v. daily for five consecutive days, on days 22–26 (Mayo Clinic regimen). One cycle consisted of 6 weeks.Results A total of 179 cycles were administered with a median of four per patient (range one to nine). Efficacy was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The overall objective response rate was 30% (95% CI 16–44), with four complete responses and nine partial responses, whereas 20 patients (4%) showed stable disease. The median time to disease progression was 9.0 months and median survival was 18.5 months. Grade 3/4 diarrhea was mainly related to CPT-11 rather than to 5-FU (9.3% vs 4.7% of patients), whereas grade 3/4 neutropenia was higher during 5-FU administration (16.3% vs 7.0% of patients).Conclusions The alternating schedule of CPT-11 with 5 days bolus of 5-FU and low-dose LV showed a clinical benefit in terms of tumor growth control as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic CRC. The overall safety data confirmed this alternating combination as a well-tolerated treatment.     

A phase II study of irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated gastric adenocarcinoma

Background:A phase II study testing the safety and efficacyof irinotecan (CPT-11), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LCV)was conducted in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinomas. Patients and methods:Patients with metastatic or recurrentadenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) or stomach wereentered onto this study. Previous chemotherapy for metastatic diseasewas not allowed. Treatment consisted of repeated 6-week cyclescomprising CPT-11 125 mg/m² intravenously (i.v.) followedimmediately by LCV 20 mg/m² i.v. and 5-FU 500mg/m² i.v., all given weekly for four weeks followed by atwo-week rest. Results:Thirty-eight patients wereenrolled and 36 eligible patients received protocol therapy. Grade3–5 toxicities consisted primarily of neutropenia (36%) anddiarrhea (28%). Neutropenic infection was observed in 14%of patients, with 3 (8%) dying of neutropenic sepsis. The overallresponse rate was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI]8.5% to 35.5%). Median survival was 7.6 months, and mediantime to progression was 4.4 months. Conclusion:Thisweekly regimen of CPT-11 with bolus 5-FU/LCV is active in patients withadvanced adenocarcinomas of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction.While rates of grade 3–4 neutropenia and diarrhea were similar tothose observed historically in patients receiving this regimen forcolorectal cancer, neutropenic fever/sepsis appeared to be morefrequent, and dose modifications were substantial. Future trials of thiscombination in patients with gastric cancer should decrease the absolutestarting drug doses and/or employ altered scheduling that betteraccommodates the pattern of toxicity.     

Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Prostatitis Caused by Chlamydia trachomatis

Abstract

To investigate the therapeutic value and safety of the biweekly regimen of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) plus irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer (AGC). A total of 50 patients (M/F 35/15; median age = 65) with AGC, none of whom had received chemotherapy for advanced disease, were accrued in this trial. Fifteen patients (30%) were 70 years old or older. At the time of their accrual, cytotoxic chemotherapy, consisting of LV 100 mg/m² (2-hour i.v. infusion) followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m² (bolus) and 5-FU 600 mg/m² (22-hour continuous infusion) on therapeutic days 1 and 2 plus CPT-11 180 mg/m² (1-hour infusion) on day 1, was initiated. Treatment courses were repeated every 2 weeks until evidence of progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. All patients were assessable for toxicity and 48 of 50 for response evaluation, having completed at least four courses of chemotherapy. Complete response was achieved in 2 patients (4%, intent to treat) and partial response in 16 (32%) (overall response rate, 36%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 22%-50%). Twenty-four patients (48%) had stable disease and 6 patients (16%) progressed. The median time to progression was 8 months (95% CI: 6-10 months) and median overall survival 14 months (95% CI: 6-22 months). Between the subgroups of patients <70 years old and 70 or older, there were no significant differences in efficacy. One toxic death occurred. Treatment tolerance was generally mild to moderate and easy to treat. The main grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (32%), diarrhea (16%), and anemia (8%). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was the only treatment-related serious adverse event significantly more common in patients older than those aged ≤70 (53.3% vs 22.8%, respectively; P = 0.03). Our data suggest that the biweekly regimen of LV and 5-FU plus CPT-11 in untreated patients with AGC is active and has an acceptable safety profile. Further evaluation of this regimen seems to be warranted in a phase III trial.     

Randomized trial comparing monthly low-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus with weekly high-dose 48-hour continuous-infusion fluorouracil for advanced colorectal cancer: A Spanish Cooperative Group for Gastrointestinal Tumor Therapy (TTD) study

Purpose: The objective of this multicenter study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles of a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) given by bolus injection together with intravenous leucovorin (LV) versus high-dose 5-FU in continuous infusion (CI) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.Patients and methods: A total of 306 patients were randomized to receive either 5-FU 425 mg/m² given by bolus injection on days 1–5 plus intravenous (i.v.) LV 20 mg/m² every four to five weeks or 5-FU 3.5 g/m²/week in a 48-hour CI. Therapy was continued until disease progression. Second-line chemotherapy was allowed in both arms.Results: The response rates in 306 patients with measurable lesions were 19.2% (modulated arm) and 30.3% (CI arm, P < 0.05). The median progression-free survival times were 23.5 weeks (modulated arm) and 25 weeks (CI arm, P = NS). Median survival times were 42.5 weeks (modulated arm) and 48 weeks (CI arm, P = NS). There were no significant differences in grade 3–4 toxicity profiles but if we consider all grades we observed more mucositis in the modulated arm and more hand-foot syndrome in the CI arm.Conclusions: In terms of response rate, the continuous infusion regimen was more effective than the modulated regimen. There was no significant difference in survival and time to progression, and none in grade 3–4 toxicity.     

Dose escalation of CPT-11 in combination with oxaliplatin using an every two weeks schedule: A phase I study in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients

Background:To determine the dose-limiting toxicity of CPT-11 incombination with oxaliplatin, and the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and therecommended dose (RD) of CPT-11 using an every two weeks schedule. Patients and methods:The study was designed to evaluate escalateddoses of CPT-11 starting at 100 mg/m² with a fixedclinically-relevant dose of 85 mg/m² oxaliplatin given every twoweeks. Results:Twenty-three patients and 186 cycles were evaluable fortoxicity (median per patient: 7, range: 1–13). Grade 3oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity was cumulative and limiting in 39%(9 of 23) of patients. The MTD of CPT-11 was 200 mg/m², withincomplete neutrophil recovery at day 15 as limiting toxicity. At the RD (175mg/m² of CPT-11): no grade 4 neutropenia was seen in the two firstcycles; 30% of patients experienced grade 3–4 diarrhea. Febrileneutropenia (3.2% of all cycles) was 3-fold more frequent inperformance status (PS) 2 than in PS 0–1 patients. Among elevencolorectal cancer (CRC) patients, three complete and four partial responseswere documented, including in three 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) refractory patients. Conclusion:To combine CPT-11 175 mg/m² and oxaliplatin85 mg/m² every two weeks is feasible in an outpatient setting, andvery active in 5-FU resistant CRC patients. A dose of 150 mg/m²CPT-11 is recommended in PS 2 patients.     

Phase I study of CPT-11 and bolus 5-FU/<Emphasis Type="Italic">l</Emphasis>-leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Background Irinotecan (CPT-11) and bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) administered weekly for 4 weeks every 42 days (Saltz regimen) is active but substantially toxic in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). The efficacy and toxicity of this regimen, however, have not been determined in Japanese patients with metastatic CRC.Methods We investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and recommended phase II dose (RD) for CPT-11 given i.v. (90-min infusion) and bolus 5-FU plus biologically active l-LV administered weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days (modified Saltz regimen) in Japanese patients with metastatic CRC. Eighteen patients with measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less, and adequate organ functions were enrolled.Results At dose level 2 (CPT-11, 100mg/m²; 5-FU, 400mg/m²; and l-LV, 25mg/body), 1 of 6 patients had DLT (febrile neutropenia). At dose level 3 (CPT-11, 100mg/m²; 5-FU, 500mg/m²; and l-LV, 25mg/body), 2 of 6 patients had DLT (febrile neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 4 days). To determine whether level 3 was the MTD level, an additional 3 patients were treated at this level, but no DLT was observed. Consequently, 2 of 9 patients had DLT at level 3, this level thus being considered as the RD. At this level, grade 3–4 neutropenia was common but manageable. Nonhematological toxicities were mild. Seven partial responses were observed in the 18 enrolled patients (response rate [RR], 39%), and 8 patients (44%) experienced stable disease.Conclusion This CPT-11/5-FU/l-LV regimen administered weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days has substantial antitumor activity, with manageable toxicities. A multicenter phase II study is currently underway.     

Multiple-target chemotherapy (LV-modulated 5-FU bolus and continuous infusion, oxaliplatin, CPT- 11) in advanced 5-FU-refractory colorectal cancer: MTD definition and efficacy evaluation. A phase I-II study

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To identify the maximum tolerated doses and to define the activity of a regimen incorporating leucovorin (LV)-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus and continuous infusion, oxaliplatin (I-OHP) and irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced, 5-FU-refractory colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Starting doses: LV 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion followed by 5-FU 300 mg/m2 bolus administration followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m2 as a 22-hour infusion on days 1 and 2; I-OHP 65 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion concomitantly with LV on day 1; CPT-11 90 mg/m2 concomitantly with LV on day 2. Planned cycle interval: 2 weeks. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-six cycles were administered to 27 patients. Recommended doses were 5-FU bolus 300 mg/m2, 5-FU protracted infusion 500 mg/m2, I-OHP 75 mg/m2, and CPT-11 150 mg/m2. Among 25 patients evaluable for response we observed 13 disease stabilizations (52%; 95% CI: 33-71%), 6 instances of disease progression and 6 responses (24%; 95% CI: 7-41%). Median time to progression and overall survival were 24 and 60 weeks, respectively. A cycle delay > 3 days was observed in 134/199 cycles (67%). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the feasibility of triplet chemotherapy in patients with advanced 5-FU-refractory CRC.     

A phase I, dose-finding study of irinotecan (CPT-11) short i.v. infusion combined with fixed dose of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) protracted i.v. infusion in adult patients with advanced solid tumours

Purpose Irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are effective cytotoxic agents in the treatment of solid tumours. Continuous i.v. infusion (CI) of 5-FU is significantly more active and better tolerated than bolus i.v. 5-FU. This phase I pharmacokinetic and clinical study evaluated escalating CPT-11 doses administered every 3 weeks combined with a fixed dose of 5-FU CI over 14 days to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combined chemotherapy.Patients and methods Patients with solid tumours showing failure with previous standard treatment or for whom no established curative therapy existed received CPT-11 i.v. over 90 min (six dose levels were evaluated: 150, 175, 200, 250, 300 and 350 mg/m²) plus a fixed dose of 5-FU CI 250 mg/m² per day over 14 days. If the MTD was not reached at CPT-11 level 6, then 5-FU was increased to 300 mg/m². In step 2, 5-FU was administered as a true protracted infusion at the recommended dose found during step 1. In step 3, the recommended dose of CPT-11 was divided and administered in a weekly schedule for 4 weeks combined with a fixed dose of 5-FU CI 250 mg/m², and then followed by 2–5 weeks rest.Results Neutropenia and diarrhoea were the main toxicities, leading to early termination of infusion in three of six patients in level 7. Therefore, CPT-11 350 mg/m² + 5-FU 250 mg/m² CI over 14 days was identified as the recommended dose. In step 2, CPT-11 dose had to be reduced to 300 mg/m² due to toxicity. The weekly schedule of CPT-11 75 mg/m² + 5-FU 250 mg/m² CI was feasible with only one patient experiencing severe diarrhoea. No interactions were found in the kinetics parameters of CPT-11 or 5-FU for the different dose levels studied.Conclusion CPT-11 300 mg/m² + 5-FU 250 mg/m² protracted infusion is the recommended dose for phase II trials, neutropenia and diarrhoea being the dose-limiting toxicities.     

Randomized trial on adjuvant treatment with FOLFIRI followed by docetaxel and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for radically resected gastric cancer

BackgroundSome trial have demonstrated a benefit of adjuvant fluoropirimidine with or without platinum compounds compared with surgery alone. ITACA-S study was designed to evaluate whether a sequential treatment of FOLFIRI [irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/LV)] followed by docetaxel plus cisplatin improves disease-free survival in comparison with 5-FU/LV in patients with radically resected gastric cancer.Patients and methodsPatients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction were randomly assigned to either FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m² day 1, LV 100 mg/m² as 2 h infusion and 5-FU 400 mg/m² as bolus, days 1 and 2 followed by 600 mg/m²/day as 22 h continuous infusion, q14 for four cycles) followed by docetaxel 75 mg/m² day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m² day 1, q21 for three cycles (sequential arm) or De Gramont regimen (5-FU/LV arm).ResultsFrom February 2005 to August 2009, 1106 patients were enrolled, and 1100 included in the analysis: 562 in the sequential arm and 538 in the 5-FU/LV arm. With a median follow-up of 57.4 months, 581 patients recurred or died (297 sequential arm and 284 5-FU/LV arm), and 483 died (243 and 240, respectively). No statistically significant difference was detected for both disease-free [hazard ratio (HR) 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85–1.17; P = 0.974] and overall survival (OS) (HR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.82–1.18; P = 0.865). Five-year disease-free and OS rates were 44.6% and 44.6%, 51.0% and 50.6% in the sequential and 5-FU/LV arm, respectively.ConclusionsA more intensive regimen failed to show any benefit in disease-free and OS versus monotherapy.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01640782.     

A prospective randomized study of irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) versus leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to compare the activity and toxicity of an irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) combination with a standard regimen of 5FU and LV, in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. One hundred and sixty patients were randomized; 80 patients (group A) received LV 20 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. and 5FU 425 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. on days 1-5, every 28 days; 80 patients (group B) received CPT-11 80 mg/m(2) (30-90 min i.v. infusion), followed by LV 20 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. and 5FU 425 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36, every 8 weeks. The overall response rate was 30% and 47.5% in groups A and B respectively. Progression-free survival was significantly higher in the triple-drug combination arm (median 7.5 vs. 4.5 months; p= 0. 0335). However, overall survival did not differ significantly between the two arms (15 months vs. 14 months for the groups B and A respectively; p=0.3531). The main grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (19%, in group A vs. 35% in group B; p=0.032) and mucositis (2% vs. 14%; p=0.017). The regimen containing irinotecan showed activity in advanced colorectal cancer. The overall safety data confirm this combination as a well-tolerated treatment.     

Bimonthly Chemotherapy with Oxaliplatin,Irinotecan, Infusional 5-Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Pretreated with Irinotecan- or Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the tolerability and efficacy of a ternary bi-monthly irinotecan (CPT-11) - oxaliplatin (OHP) - infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) combination in advanced colorectal cancer patients who had received prior CPT-11 and/or OHP-based chemotherapy regimen. Colorectal cancer patients were given bimonthly CPT-11 as a 90-min infusion, followed by OHP (85 mg/m²), FA (200 mg/m²) 2-h infusions and 5-FU (48-h infusion). CPT-11 and 5-FU doses were escalated as reported below. 26 patients were recruited. Fourteen patients had received a prior CPT-11-, 6 patients a prior OHP-based chemotherapy regimen and 6 patients both regimens. Three dose levels were investigated: CPT-11 100, 120 and 140 mg/m² and 5-FU 1500, 1800 and 2100 mg/m² in 6, 12 and 8 patients, respectively. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, 24 for antitumor activity. At all dose levels toxicity was ac-ceptable. Grade 4 toxicity occurred in two patients only (neutropenia in one case and stomatitis in another one, 3.8%). Grade 3 toxicities included nausea and vomiting (34.6%), asthenia (26.9%), neurosensory toxicity (15.4%), neutropenia (3.8%) and di-arrhea (3.8%). Hematological toxicity was infrequent and generally mild. At the third dose level, a higher, although not significantly different incidence of hematological and neurosensory toxicity (both occurring in 62.5% of cases, all grades) was observed compared to the other two, while nausea and vomiting were significantly less frequent (37.5% vs 100%). Overall, we observed 2 complete responses, 9 partial responses (OR 45.8%), 8 stable disease (33.3%), and 5 disease progression (20.8%). Median overall survival was 18 months and median time-to-progression 5.5 months. This combination showed moderate toxicity and promising antitumor activity in CPT-11 and/or OHP pretreated colorectal cancer patients. The second dose level using CPT-11 at 120 mg/m² and 5-FU at 1800 mg/m² is recommended for further phase II studies in this patient population.     

A phase III randomised trial of LV5FU2 + irinotecan versus LV5FU2 alone in adjuvant high-risk colon cancer (FNCLCC Accord02/FFCD9802)

BackgroundThis multicenter adjuvant phase III trial evaluated the addition of irinotecan to LV5FU2 in colon cancer patients at high risk of relapse.Patients and methodsA total of 400 patients with histologically proven primary colon cancer with postoperative N1 detected by occlusion/perforation or N2 were randomised to: A—LV5FU2 [leucovorin 200 mg/m², 2-h infusion, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m² bolus, 600 mg/m² 22-h continuous infusion, days 1 and 2] or B—LV5FU2 + IRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m² 90-min infusion day 1 + LV5FU2) fortnightly for 12 cycles. Primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).ResultsMedian follow-up was 63 months. Significantly more T4 tumours and 15 or more positive lymph nodes were observed in arm B. 5-FU relative dose intensity (RDI) was >0.80 for 94% and 77% in arms A and B, respectively (P < 0.001). Irinotecan RDI was >0.80 for 70% patients. There were more grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in arm B (4% versus 28%, P < 0.001). The 3-year DFS was 60% [95% confidence interval (CI) 53% to 66%] and 51% (95% CI 44% to 58) in arms A and B, respectively. No difference was observed [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12, 95% CI 0.85–1.47, P = 0.42] even when adjusted for prognostic factors (adjusted HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.74–1.31, P = 0.92). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 67% (95% CI 59% to 73%) and 61% (95% CI 53% to 67%) in arms A and B, respectively.ConclusionAdjuvant LV5FU2 + IRI compared with LV5FU2 alone in patients at high risk of relapse showed no improvement in DFS and OS.     

Phase II trial of bimonthly leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (FOLFUGEM)

Background:Gemcitabine alone or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) according to several schedules are used for palliation of metastatic and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study was designed to test the efficacy of the leucovorin–5-FU and gemcitabine combination. Patients and methods:This phase II trial combined a simplified bimonthly LV5FU2 with gemcitabine: leucovorin 400 mg/m² in a two-hour infusion, followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m² bolus and 2 or 3 g/m² continuous infusion over 46 hours; gemcitabine 1 g/m² was infused over 30 min on day 3 after 5-FU. Treatment was repeated every two weeks. Gemcitabine dose could be increased (250 mg/m² every two cycles up to 1500 mg/m²) in the absence of NCI-CTC toxicity >2. Results:Among the 62 patients included in this study, 22 had LA and 40 had metastatic disease. Objective response rate for the 54 patients with measurable disease was 25.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 14%–37.8%) and 22.6% (95% CI: 12%–33.2%) in the intent-to-treat population; the clinical benefit rate for the 59 assessable patients was 49.2%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 4.8 and 9 months, respectively, with 32.3% of patients alive at 1 year. The most frequent toxicity (grade 3–4) was neutropenia (56.5%) usually asymptomatic (1.1% febrile neutropenia), but requiring decreases of 5-FU and gemcitabine doses. Unexpected complete alopecia occurred in 97% of patients. Conclusions:Palliative effects, response rate and survival observed in this multicenter study seem to be superior to those obtained with gemcitabine or 5-FU alone, despite a limiting hematological toxicity.     

Intermittent versus continuous chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomised ‘GISCAD’ trial

BackgroundIn advanced colorectal cancer, chemotherapy is usually administered without pauses and until progression but patients can experience cumulative toxicity and cannot tolerate a heavy therapeutic charge.AimThe aim of the present trial was to evaluate whether an intermittent chemotherapy with levo-leucovorin + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) + irinotecan (CPT-11) was at least as effective as the same regimen given continuously, both administered until progression, in patients affected with advanced colorectal cancer and not previously exposed to chemotherapy for metastatic disease.Patients, materials and methodsA total of 337 patients from 27 institutions were randomised between levo-leucovorin, 100/mg/m² i.v. + 5-FU; 400 mg/m² i.v. bolus + 5-FU; 600 mg/m² 22-h continuous infusion, days 1 and 2 + CPT-11; 180 mg/m² day 1, administered every 2 weeks 2 months on and 2 months off (arm A) and the same regimen administered continuously (arm B), until progression in both arms. The main end point was overall survival (OS), the secondary progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity.ResultsAt a median follow-up of 41 months, OS was 18 months in arm A and 17 months in arm B [hazard ratio (HR), 0.88]. Also PFS was comparable in the two groups (6 months in both, with HR, 1.03), and even grades 3–4 toxicity (mainly myelosuppression, fever and diarrhoea) was similar. Second-line oxaliplatin-based treatment was administered in a similar percentage (66%) in the two arms. The median chemotherapy-free period (drug holiday) in arm A was 3.5 months.ConclusionReducing the charge of therapy in this population did not diminish the efficacy of treatment. Further studies with this strategy, including biologicals, are warranted.     

FOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) vs FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan) as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC): a multicentre randomised phase III trial from the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)

To compare the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (FOLFOXIRI) vs irinotecan and 5-FU/LV (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). A total of 283 chemotherapy-na?ve patients with MCC were enrolled (FOLFIRI arm: n=146; FOLFOXIRI arm: n=137). In the FOLFOXIRI arm, CPT-11 (150 mg m(-2)) was given on d1, L-OHP (65 mg m(-2)) on d2, LV (200 mg m(-2)) on days 2 and 3 and 5-FU (400 mg m(-2) as i.v. bolus and 600 mg m(-2) as 22 h i.v. continuous infusion) on days 2 and 3. In the FOLFIRI arm, CPT-11 (180 mg m(-2)) was given on d1 whereas LV and 5-FU were administered in the same way as in the FOLFOXIRI regimen. Both regimens were administered every 2 weeks. There was no difference in terms of overall survival (median OS: 19.5 and 21.5 months, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively; P=0.337), median time to disease progression (FOLFIRI: 6.9 and FOLFOXIRI: 8.4 months; P=0.17), response rates (33.6 and 43% for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively; P=0.168). Patients treated with FOLFOXIRI had a significantly higher incidence of alopecia (P=0.0001), diarrhoea (P=0.0001) and neurosensory toxicity (P=0.001) compared with patients treated with FOLFIRI. The present study failed to demonstrate any superiority of the FOLFOXIRI combination compared with the FOLFIRI regimen, although the observed median OS is one of the best ever reported in the literature.     

Concurrent irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil plus levo-folinic acid given every other week in the first-line management of advanced colorectal carcinoma: A phase I study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group

Objectives: To determine the maximum tolerable doses (MTDs) of irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus levo-folinic acid (LFA) administered together every two weeks, to define the toxicity profile of this regimen, and to have a preliminary evidence of its activity in the first-line management of advanced colorectal cancer patients.Patients and methods: Patients with histologically proven colorectal carcinoma, no prior chemotherapy for their advanced disease, and with at least one measurable or evaluable indicator lesion, were admitted to this study. The starting dose of CPT-11 was 150 mg/m² given i.v. (90 min infusion) on day 1, followed on day 2 by a fixed dose of LFA (250 mg/m²) as a two-hour i.v. infusion plus a starting dose of 5-FU 600 mg/m² as i.v. bolus. No intra-patient dose escalation was allowed. If no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed among three patients of each cohort, CPT-11 and 5-FU were alternately escalated in the subsequent cohort. Otherwise, three more patients were enrolled at the same dose level. DLT was defined as: WHO grade 3 non-haematological toxicity (except for vomiting or alopecia), grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 4 neutro- or thombocytopenia, or a >2-week delay in recycling. The MTDs were defined as the doses at which two of three, or four of six, patients showed the same DLT.Results: Thirty-one patients (five pretreated in adjuvant setting) were enrolled in this study, and a total number of 293 cycles (median 6/patient) were administered. Dose escalation safely proceeded to 210/950/250 mg/m² of CPT-11/5-FU/LFA. These dosages were considered as MTDs, since four of six patients showed grade 4 neutropenia, in one case associated with grade 3 stomatitis. A mild decrease of both the CPT-11 and 5-FU doses to 200 and 850 mg/m², respectively, caused different DLTs (neutropenia and diarrhoea) in two out of seven patients. At these dosages, transient grades 3 or 4 neutropenia affected two patients each during their treatment, while only one patient suffered from a severe delayed diarrhoea. Other non-haematological toxicities were mild and manageable. Therefore, we recommend this latter dose level for further study. Major responses (3 complete and 11 partial) were reported in 14 patients, for an overall response rate of 45% (95% CI: 27%–64%) according to an intent-to-treat analysis. Responses were observed from first dose level, and in four of five previously treated patients. Median failure-free and overall survivals, after a median follow-up of 39 weeks, were 42 and 55 weeks, respectively.Conclusions: The concurrent administration of CPT-11 and modulated 5-FU every two weeks is feasible at the recommended dosages. This regimen demonstrated interesting activity in the management of advanced colorectal cancer patients, and it probably better exploits the synergism between CPT-11 and 5-FU than recently tested alternating schedules. A phase II study is ongoing to more precisely define its activity and toxicity.     

A randomized phase II trial of irinotecan in combination with infusional or two different bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid regimens as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Three different therapeutic regimens of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) were evaluated for efficacy and safety in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenously either: CPT-11 125 mg/m(2), FA 20 mg/m(2) followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) bolus, weekly for 4 weeks (arm A, Saltz regimen); or CPT-11 180 mg/m(2) day 1 then FA 200 mg/m(2) over 2 h and 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus and 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) 22-h infusion on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks (arm B, Douillard regimen); or CPT-11 350 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 43) alternating with FA 20 mg/m(2)/day followed by 5-FU bolus 425 mg/m(2)/day during 5 days (days 22-26) (arm C, Mayo Clinic regimen). RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were included in the study (arm A, 51 patients; arm B, 53; arm C, 50). Overall response rates for the intention-to-treat populations were 33% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21% to 48%], 42% (95% CI 28% to 56%) and 30% (95% CI 18% to 45%) for arms A, B and C, respectively. Median times to progression were 6, 8 and 7 months for arms A, B and C, respectively. Median survival times were 15, 12 and 17 months for arms A, B and C, respectively. Overall response rates for the evaluable patient populations were 40% (95% CI 24% to 58%) in arm A, 44% (95% CI 29% to 60%) in arm B and 31% (95% CI 17% to 47%) in arm C. Neutropenia was the main serious adverse event in arms A (30% of patients) and C (22% of patients) but occurred in only 8% of patients in arm B. Delayed diarrhea was the main severe adverse event for the three regimens, from 15% to 22%. CONCLUSION: All three regimens were highly active. The biweekly combination of CPT-11 and 5-FU/FA (arm B) was notable for its low incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. The incidence of grade 3/4 delayed diarrhea was equivalent for the three treatment arms.