Stent or angioplasty after recanalization of chronic coronary occlusions? (The SARECCO Trial).

This study tests whether stent implantation without anticoagulation after catheter recanalization of coronary occlusions can improve outcome compared with balloon angioplasty alone. One hundred ten patients were randomly assigned to angioplasty alone (no stent group) or stent implantation (stent group) after successful recanalization and balloon angioplasty. The type of stent and angioplasty technique utilized were decided by the operator. The acute procedural success in both groups was 100%. The acute minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was 1.85 +/- 0.44 mm in the no stent group versus 2.54 +/- 0.53 mm in the stent group (p <0.01). The diameter stenosis was 21 +/- 13% versus 3 +/- 14% (p <0.01). This was achieved not only by the stent implantation itself but primarily by a larger maximum balloon diameter in the stent group after stent implantation (3.32 +/- 0.55 mm vs 2.86 +/- 0.4 mm, p <0.05). After 4 months, the MLD was 1.15 +/- 0.73 mm in the no stent group versus 1.81 +/- 0.9 mm in the stent group (p <0.01). The diameter stenosis was 56 +/- 29% versus 34 +/- 28% (p <0.01). After 2 years, event-free survival was 26% in the no stent group and 52% in the stent group (p <0.05). Thus, acute and long-term procedural and angiographic success of stent implantation without anticoagulation after recanalization of total coronary occlusions is superior to that of balloon angioplasty alone. This beneficial effect is mainly the result of the larger balloon diameters, which may be used after stent implantation.     

Coronary stenting or balloon angioplasty for chronic total coronary occlusions: the Taiwan experience (a single-center report)

The authors conducted this study to compare the restenosis and reocclusion rates of primary balloon angioplasty alone versus angioplasty followed by stenting in Taiwanese patients with chronic total occlusions. They also evaluated whether stenting reduced the incidence of restenosis and improved left ventricular function in these patients. From October 1998 to April 2000, a total of 294 patients with chronic total occlusion (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 0 flow) underwent recanalization using balloon angioplasty alone or followed by stent implantation. Of these, only 129 patients were included after procedural failure and patients lost to follow-up; 62 patients were placed in the stent group, while 67 patients were assigned to the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) group. Coronary angiography was performed at baseline and at 6 months follow-up or earlier if angina or objective evidence of ischemia involving the target vessel or other vessels was present. Procedural success was 60%. Minimal lumen diameter increased significantly after stenting: 2.97 +/-0.41 vs 2.24 +/-0.41 (p < 0.001); 60% of patients in the stent group were free of restenosis, whereas only 33% in the PTCA group were free of restenosis at follow-up. Only 1 patient in the stent group had reocclusion, as opposed to 17 (25%) patients in the PTCA group (p < 0.001). The follow-up minimal lumen diameter (MLD) at 6 months was significantly larger in the stent group: 1.80 +/-0.85 mm vs 1.08 +/-0.82 mm (p < 0.001). Left ventricular function improved in the stent group, but not in the PTCA group (58.44 +/-16.58% to 63.60 +/-14.59% [p < 0.001] vs 54.13 +/-15.66% to 54.31 +/-15.60% [p = 0.885]). More patients had angina in the PTCA group than in the stented group 43 vs 29 (p = 0.053). The postprocedural MLD and reference vessel diameter (RVD) were the strong predictors of restenosis and follow-up MLD (p < 0.001). Stenting of chronically occluded arteries significantly reduced the incidence of reocclusion and restenosis, at the same time improving left ventricular function in these patients. This should be the procedure of choice after successful angioplasty of chronically occluded vessels.     

Six-month outcome after excimer laser coronary angioplasty for diffuse in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteries

This study evaluated the intermediate-term follow-up after excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) and adjunctive percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with diffuse in-stent restenosis (lesion length >10 mm). Clinical and angiographic follow-up were performed at 6 months. Quantitative coronary angiography performed at 3 stages-during stent implantation, before and after ELCA + PTCA, and at follow-up-included measurements of the minimum lumen diameter (MLD) and percent diameter stenosis (DS). Sixteen consecutive patients were included. The (median + range) stent length was 36 mm (range 15 to 105), with a restenotic lesion length of 32 mm (range 10 to 90). After ELCA + PTCA, the MLD increased from 0.60 +/- 0.41 to 2.28 +/- 0.50 mm, whereas the DS decreased from 76 +/- 16% to 22 +/- 8%. Despite adjunctive high-pressure PTCA, the MLD after ELCA + PTCA remained smaller than the MLD after initial stent implantation, (2.28 +/- 0. 50 mm vs 2.67 +/- 0.32 mm, p = 0.014). Adverse events included ELCA-related acute coronary occlusion in 4 patients and a per-procedural intracerebral hematoma in 1. At 6 months, there was recurrence of angina in all patients. Angiographic follow-up was completed in 13 patients (87%), showing a reocclusion in 6 (46%), a >50% DS in 6 (MLD 1.03 +/- 0.87 mm, DS 68 +/- 24%), and a distal de novo lesion in 1. Despite satisfactory acute angiographic results, the recurrence of significant restenosis in all patients suggests that ELCA + PTCA is not a suitable stand-alone therapy for diffuse in-stent restenosis of long stented segments.     

Impact of sirolimus-eluting stent on the outcome of patients with chronic total occlusions

Several randomized trials have demonstrated that stent implantation after successful recanalization of long-term total occlusions decreases restenosis and reocclusion rates. The sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) has recently proved its efficacy to decrease restenosis in selected patients. However, the efficacy of SES implantation in patients who have chronic total occlusions is currently unknown. Therefore, we investigated procedural and 6- and 12-month angiographic outcomes (analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography) and left ventricular function in 60 patients who received SESs and 120 patients who received bare metal stents (BMSs). Minimum luminal diameter did not differ immediately after recanalization (SES group 3.04 +/- 0.50 mm vs BMS group 3.12 +/- 0.48 mm). After 6 months, the SES group still had significantly larger luminal diameters (3.04 +/- 0.44 mm vs 1.94 +/- 0.98 mm) and significantly lower restenosis and reocclusion rates (2% and 0%, respectively) than did the BMS group (32% and 6%, respectively). Late loss was significantly smaller in the SES group than in the BMS group. At follow-up, the SES group had fewer cardiac events, including target lesion revascularization (p <0.001), than did the BMS group. In conclusion, SES implantation after recanalization of chronic total occlusion provides a better clinical outcome with less restenosis and target lesion revascularization after 6 months than does BMSs.     

Stents in total occlusion for restenosis prevention. The multicentre randomized STOP study. The Israeli Working Group for Interventional Cardiology.

AIMS: This multicentre randomized study set out to evaluate whether coronary stenting improves the results of successful balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusion. Balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusion has a high restenosis rate. Several reports have suggested that coronary stenting may decrease the likelihood of restenosis and reocclusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with total coronary artery occlusions who had an optimal PTCA result were randomized either to no further treatment or additional stent implantation. The AVE microstent was used and all patients were scheduled for a 1-, 3-, and 6-month clinical follow-up. Repeat coronary angiography to assess the rate and pattern of restenosis was performed at 6 months or earlier if clinically indicated. Ninety-six patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 59. 3+/-10.3 years and 15 were females. Forty-eight patients were randomized to the stent arm, receiving 52 stents (lengths 18-39 mm). Stent implantation was successful in all and there were no major procedure-related complications. Sixty-nine patients (72%) were restudied after 6 months. The binary restenosis rates (50%), in the PTCA arm were 70.9% with a minimal lumen diameter of 1.01+/-0.79 mm compared to 42.1% in the stent arm with a minimal lumen diameter of 1.63+/-1.02 mm (P=0.034). Reocclusion occurred in 7.9% in the stent group compared to 16.1% in the PTCA group. Restenosis in the PTCA group was focal in 88% of patients and occurred at the point of total obstruction (within 5 mm), compared to diffuse instent restenosis, which occurred in 54% of the patients in the stent group. CONCLUSION: Coronary stenting can significantly decrease the rate of restenosis and reocclusion of total occlusions. As restenosis in the stent group was more diffuse, care should be taken to implant short stents at the site of occlusion.     

Effect of statin therapy on restenosis after coronary stent implantation

The effect of statins on the development of restenosis and clinical outcome after coronary stent implantation was assessed in a retrospective analysis of 525 consecutive patients. Baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics did not differ between 258 patients with and 267 patients without statin therapy. Statin therapy was associated with a significantly (p<0.04) improved survival free of myocardial infarction and a significant reduction in repeat target vessel revascularization procedures (27.9% vs. 36.7%, p<0.05) during 6-month follow-up. Minimal lumen diameter was significantly larger (1.98+/-0.88 vs. 1.78+/-0.88 mm, p = 0.01), late lumen loss was significantly less (0.64+/-0.8 vs. 0.8+/-0.8 mm, p = 0.032), and net gain significantly increased (1.2+/-0.88 vs. 0.98+/- 0.92 mm, p = 0. 009) in patients receiving statin therapy. Dichotomous angiographic restenosis (> or =50%) rates were significantly lower, with 25.4% in the statin group compared with 38% in the no-statin group (p<0.005). Multivariate analysis identified statin therapy (p = 0.005), minimal lumen diameter immediately after stenting (p = 0.02), and stent length (p = 0.02) as independent predictors for subsequent restenosis development. Thus, statin therapy is associated with reduced recurrence rates and improved clinical outcome after coronary stent implantation.     

Predictors of re-occlusion after successful recanalization of chronic total occlusion.

The objective of this study was to highlight the incidence and predictors of re-occlusion after successful recanalization of chronic total coronary occlusions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Following successful recanalization and stent implantation in 716 coronary lesions (665 patients) with chronic total occlusion, four hundred and five (56.6%) lesions (375 patients) underwent repeat angiography within 6 months. Restenosis (> or = 50% lumen narrowing) was observed in 151 (37.3%) lesions; forty-three (10.6%) of these lesions had complete re-occlusion and constituted the study population. In this group, final angiographic minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was 2.6 +/- 0.51 mm and final percent diameter stenosis was 18 +/- 11. Univariate analysis revealed significant correlation between re-occlusion and restenotic lesions, final balloon diameter, final percent diameter stenosis, final angiographic MLD, number of stents per lesion and total stent length. By multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of re-occlusion was total stent length (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.12-1.82; p = 0.0069). CONCLUSION: Re-occlusion occurs in about 11% of cases after stenting chronic total occlusion. The most important predictor of re-occlusion seems to be stent length.     

Coronary stent implantation is superior to balloon angioplasty for chronic coronary occlusions: six-year clinical follow-up of the GISSOC trial

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether the benefits of stent implantation over balloon percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) are maintained in the long term. BACKGROUND: Several randomized trials have shown that in CTO, stent implantation confers clinical and angiographic mid-term outcomes superior to those observed after PTCA. However, limited information on the long-term results of either technique is available. METHODS: Six-year clinical follow-up of patients enrolled in the Gruppo Italiano di Studio sullo Stent nelle Occlusioni Coronariche (GISSOC) trial was performed by direct visit or telephone interview. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and anginal status, were recorded. RESULTS: Freedom from MACE at six years was 76.1% in the stent group, compared with 60.4% in the PTCA group (p = 0.0555). This difference was due mainly to TLR-free survival rates (85.1% vs. 65.5% for the stent and PTCA groups, respectively; p = 0.0165). Eleven patients underwent TLR after the nine-month follow-up visit (stent group: n = 5; PTCA group: n = 6); however, in most cases, restenosis of the study occlusion was evident at nine-month angiography. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the longest reported clinical follow-up of patients after percutaneous recanalization of CTO and demonstrates that the superiority of stent implantation over balloon PTCA is maintained in the long term. Stent and PTCA results appear to remain stable after nine-month angiographic follow-up. Stent implantation in CTO that can be recanalized percutaneously is therefore a valuable long-term therapeutic option.     

A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVES: This randomized trial compared repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: Stent restenosis constitutes a therapeutic challenge. Repeat coronary interventions are currently used in this setting, but the recurrence risk remains high. METHODS: We randomly assigned 450 patients with ISR to elective stent implantation (224 patients) or conventional BA (226 patients). Primary end point was recurrent restenosis rate at six months. Secondary end points included minimal lumen diameter (MLD), prespecified subgroup analyses, and a composite of major adverse events. RESULTS: Procedural success was similar in both groups, but in-hospital complications were more frequent in the balloon group. After the procedure MLD was larger in the stent group (2.77 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.25 +/- 0.5 mm, p < 0.001). At follow-up, MLD was larger after stenting when the in-lesion site was considered (1.69 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.54 +/- 0.7 mm, p = 0.046). However, the binary restenosis rate (38% stent group, 39% balloon group) was similar with the two strategies. One-year event-free survival (follow-up 100%) was also similar in both groups (77% stent vs. 71% balloon, p = 0.19). Nevertheless, in the prespecified subgroup of patients with large vessels (> or =3 mm) the restenosis rate (27% vs. 49%, p = 0.007) and the event-free survival (84% vs. 62%, p = 0.002) were better after repeat stenting. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, repeat coronary stenting provided better initial angiographic results but failed to improve restenosis rate and clinical outcome when compared with BA. However, in patients with large vessels coronary stenting improved the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome.     

Sirolimus-eluting stent in chronic total occlusion: the SICTO study

Coronary stenting can significantly reduce the restenosis and reocclusion rates after successful balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusions (CTO). Nevertheless, recanalization of CTO remains among the worst predictors for in-stent restenosis and reocclusion. This multicenter, nonrandomized study assessed the safety and effectiveness of the CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stent in reducing angiographic in-stent late loss in totally occluded native coronary arteries. A total of 25 eligible patients were treated with the CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stent. Baseline clinical and angiographic data were collected and 6-month follow-up angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were performed. Clinical follow-up was required at 30 days, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Study stent implantation was successful in all patients, with a mean stent length of 28.4 +/- 11 mm. Six-month angiographic outcomes showed that mean lumen diameter stenosis did not change (2.22 +/- 0.56 mm postprocedure; 2.26 +/- 0.60 mm at 6 months follow-up; P = NS). Similarly, mean percent diameter stenosis did not change significantly (15.7 +/- 8.6% postprocedure, 19.3 +/- 11% at follow-up; P = NS). The absolute late lumen loss was -0.03 +/- 0.28 mm with a 6-month in-stent restenosis rate of 0%. IVUS follow-up revealed in-stent obstruction volume of only 4.9 +/- 6.8%. Long-term clinical follow-up showed target lesion revascularization at 12 months was only 4%, with target vessel revascularization of only 12%. The CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stent was safe and effective in the treatment of CTO compared to historical data with bare metal stents.     

Thiazolidinedione treatment attenuates diffuse neointimal hyperplasia in restenotic lesions after coronary stent implantation in type 2 diabetic patients: an intravascular ultrasound study

OBJECTIVES: Thiazolidinedione treatment reduces neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in diabetic patients. However, in-stent restenosis still persists in patients treated with thiazolidinedione. The effect of thiazolidinedione treatment on the pattern of in-stent restenosis remains unclear. This study investigated whether thiazolidinedione treatment attenuates diffuse neointimal hyperplasia in restenotic lesions after coronary stent implantation in diabetic patients. METHODS: Volumetric intravascular ultrasound was performed at 6 months after coronary stent implantation in 76 patients with restenotic lesions who received either conventional anti-diabetic treatment (control group, n = 56) or thiazolidinedione treatment (thiazolidinedione group, n = 20). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in stent volume (99 +/- 32 vs 90 +/- 20 mm3, respectively, p = 0.26) or in minimal lumen area in the stent (1.4 +/- 0.6 vs 1.6 +/- 0.5 mm2, respectively, p = 0.11). However, there were significant reductions in neointimal volume (56 +/- 25 vs 36 +/- 11 mm3, respectively, p < 0.01)and neointimal index (56 +/- 11% vs 41 +/- 8%, respectively, p < 0.01) in the thiazolidinedione group. Coefficient of variation of neointimal tissue accumulation was greater in the thiazolidinedione group (45.5%) than in the control group (25.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound study demonstrated that together with reduction of overall neointimal tissue proliferation, thiazolidinedione treatment caused greater point-to-point heterogeneity in the neointimal tissue accumulation in restenotic lesions after coronary stent implantation. This finding strongly suggests that thiazolidinedione treatment attenuates diffuse in-stent restenosis in diabetic patients.     

Outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in patients with stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). BACKGROUND: Restenosis and recurrent cardiac events after percutaneous intervention are more common for lesions in the LAD than other native coronary arteries, and often necessitate bypass surgery. Drug-eluting stents may improve the long-term prognosis of this high-risk group. METHODS: In the TAXUS-IV trial, 1,314 patients with single de novo coronary lesions were assigned to implantation of the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent or an identical bare-metal stent; 536 (41%) randomized patients had LAD lesions. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients with LAD lesions were well-matched between the randomized groups. Late lumen loss at nine months after paclitaxel-eluting and control stent implantation were 0.28 +/- 0.51 mm and 0.54 +/- 0.57 mm, respectively (p = 0.0004), and binary restenosis rates were 11.3% and 26.9%, respectively (p = 0.004). At one year, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 13.5% of TAXUS-treated patients versus 21.2% treated with the control stent (p = 0.01). The need for bypass surgery at one year was reduced among patients randomized to the TAXUS stent (2.6% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.02). In the proximal LAD subgroup (n = 126), the one-year target vessel revascularization rate was 7.9% with the TAXUS stent and 18.6% with the bare-metal stent (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to bare-metal stents, implantation of polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stents in LAD lesions is safe, and reduces angiographic restenosis and MACE one year. Notably, the need for bypass graft surgery due to restenosis is reduced after TAXUS stent implantation in LAD lesions.     

Comparison of coronary restenosis rates in matched patients with versus without diabetes mellitus

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an established risk factor for stent restenosis, in part as a result of the smaller vessel dimensions and longer lesions. This study compared the magnitude of acute lumen gain and late lumen loss after elective coronary stent implantation in patients with and without DM using a matched-pair analysis. A total of 133 patients with DM and 192 coronary lesions were included in this analysis. A group of 192 lesions in 182 patients without DM were matched in a pairwise fashion, stratifying for reference diameter, minimal luminal diameter, and lesion length. The binary restenosis rate at the 5-month follow-up angiography was 25% in the DM group and 14% in the non-DM group (p <0.01). Acute angiographic lumen gain (1.47 +/- 0.41 vs 1.56 +/- 0.38 mm, p = 0.03) and late lumen loss (0.64 +/- 0.42 vs 0.55 +/- 0.36 mm, p = 0.02) were significantly different between the DM and non-DM groups. In conclusion, suboptimal acute procedural results and an exaggerated neointimal proliferation contributed by about 50% to the lower net lumen gain in the DM group. Patients with DM had a significantly higher restenosis rate even when matched for preprocedural angiographic lesion dimensions. Mechanistically, inferior procedural results, as well as exaggerated neointimal proliferation, are, quantitatively, equally important in this process.     

Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stent (OCBAS): Immediate and long-term follow-up results

Objective. This study sought to compare two strategies of revascularization in patients obtaining a good immediate angiographic result after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): elective stenting versus optimal PTCA. A good immediate angiographic result with provisional stenting was considered to occur only if early loss in minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was documented at 30 min post-PTCA angiography.Background. Coronary stenting reduces restenosis in lesions exhibiting early deterioration (>0.3 mm) in MLD within the first 24 hours (early loss) after successful PTCA. Lesions with no early loss after PTCA have a low restenosis rate.Methods. To compare angiographic restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR) of lesions treated with coronary stenting versus those treated with optimal PTCA, 116 patients were randomized to stent (n = 57) or to optimal PTCA (n = 59). After randomization in the PTCA group, 13.5% of the patients crossed over to stent due to early loss (provisional stenting).Results. Baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were similar in both groups of patients. At 7.6 months, 96.6% of the entire population had a follow-up angiographic study: 98.2% in the stent and 94.9% in the PTCA group. Immediate and follow-up angiographic data showed that acute gain was significantly higher in the stent than in the PTCA group (1.95 vs. 1.5 mm; p < 0.03). However, late loss was significantly higher in the stent than the PTCA group (0.63 ± 0.59 vs. 0.26 ± 0.44, respectively; p = 0.01). Hence, net gain with both techniques was similar (1.32 ± 0.3 vs. 1.24 ± 0.29 mm for the stent and the PTCA groups, respectively; p = NS). Angiographic restenosis rate at follow-up (19.2% in stent vs. 16.4% in PTCA; p = NS) and TVR (17.5% in stent vs. 13.5% in PTCA; p = NS) were similar. Furthermore, event-free survival was 80.8% in the stent versus 83.1% in the PTCA group (p = NS). Overall costs (hospital and follow-up) were US $591,740 in the stent versus US $398,480 in the PTCA group (p < 0.02).Conclusions. The strategy of PTCA with delay angiogram and provisional stent if early loss occurs had similar restenosis rate and TVR, but lower cost than primary stenting after PTCA.     

Intracoronary Stenting for Restenosis: Long-Term Follow-up: A Single Center Experience

One-hundred thirteen stents (78 Wallstents, 29 Palmaz-Schatz and 6 Wiktor) were implanted in 106 patients aged 63 +/- 5 years to treat a restenosis following previous angioplasty in a native coronary artery (86 cases) and in a venous graft (20 cases). Implantation was technically possible in all cases. The native vessels had a mean reference diameter of 3.3 +/- 0.3 mm and their mean minimal lumen diameter increased from 1.2 +/- 0.3 mm before angioplasty to 2.8 +/- 0.8 after stent implantation. The venous grafts mean reference diameter was 4.4 +/- 0.7 mm and their mean minimal lumen diameter increased from 1.3 +/- 0.4 mm before angioplasty to 4.0 +/- 0.7 mm after implantation. Percentage stenosis in the native arteries and in the venous grafts were respectively 78 +/- 13% and 69 +/- 14% before angioplasty and 24 +/- 8% and 22 +/- 8% after stent implantation. Complications at 6 months, presented as a ranking scale with 100% follow-up rate were, overall, of 20% clinical events (4% deaths, 6% myocardial infractions, 2% coronary artery bypass grafting and 8% re-angioplasty). Angiographic complications were of 8% subacute thrombosis and 19% restenosis and chronic occlusions. Long-term, at 65 +/- 9 months, clinical (86% follow-up) and angiographic (74% follow-up) showed that only a further 9% clinical events and 14% restenosis (12% of them between 6 and 12 months) occurred after 6 months. At an estimated follow-up time of 104 months, 70% patients remain event-free and the survival rate is 95%. In conclusion, stent implantation in the treatment of restenosis following conventional balloon angioplasty is a valid strategy with good long-term results.     

Latin American randomized trial of balloon angioplasty vs coronary stenting for small vessels (LASMAL): immediate and long-term results

PURPOSE: To assess the potential role of coronary stent to improved acute success and reduce late restenosis in lesions with reference diameter <2.9 mm using a bare metal stent specifically designed for small coronary vessels. There is controversy on the results among previous studies comparing bare metal stent implantation with conventional balloon percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Differences in baseline characteristics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and stent design may account for these discrepancies. METHODS: The population of this multicenter, multinational randomized study (LASMAL) consisted of 246 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of small vessel reference diameter. They were randomized into 2 strategies of percutaneous revascularization: elective primary stent (n = 124) or conventional balloon PTCA with provisional stenting (n = 122) in the presence of acute, threatened closure or flow-limiting dissections. RESULTS: The clinical success rate was significantly better for the stent group (98.3% vs 91.8%; P = 0.038). At 30 days follow-up, requirements of target vessel revascularization (TVR) (6.6% vs 0.8%; P = 0.018) and incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (9.8% vs 2.4%; P = 0.01) was significantly lower in the stent strategy. Postpercutaneous coronary intervention minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was significantly larger in the stent group (2.3 +/- 0.2 mm vs 2.2 +/- 0.2 mm; P = 0.003). At follow-up, MLD in the stent group was larger than with PTCA (1.7 +/- 0.7 mm vs 1.5 +/- 0.7 mm, respectively; P = 0.035). Net gain was also significantly better with stent strategy (1.1 +/- 0.7 mm vs 0.8 +/- 0.7 mm, respectively; P = 0.002). Stenting resulted in a significant lower angiographic binary restenosis (20% vs 31%; P = 0.02) than PTCA. Furthermore, patients treated with stent were more frequently free from MACCE at 9-month follow-up (death, acute myocardial infarction [AMI], stroke, repeat revascularization procedures) than those treated initially with PTCA (82.2% vs 72% of PTCA, P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a specifically designed bare metal coronary phosphoril choline-coated stent as primary device during percutaneous interventions in small coronary arteries was associated with high procedural success and low in-hospital and 30-day follow-up complications. At long-term follow-up, patients initially treated with stents had lower angiographic restenosis rate and were more frequently free from major adverse cardiac events.     

Sustained benefit of stenting chronic coronary occlusion: long-term clinical follow-up of the Stenting in Chronic Coronary Occlusion (SICCO) study

Objectives. This study assessed the long-term clinical outcome of stenting chronic occlusions.Background. In the Stenting in Chronic Coronary Occlusion (SICCO) study, patients were randomized to additional stent implantation (n = 58) or not (n = 59) after successful recanalization and dilation of a chronic coronary occlusion. Palmaz-Schatz stents were used with full anticoagulation. The previously published 6-month angiographic follow-up results showed reduction of the restenosis rate from 74% to 32%.Methods. The primary end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, lesion-related acute myocardial infarction, repeat lesion-related revascularization or angiographic documentation of reocclusion).Results. Late clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients at 33 ± 6 months. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 14 patients (24.1%) in the stent group compared with 35 patients (59.3%) in the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) group (odds ratio 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.49, p = 0.0002). Target vessel revascularization (including failed PTCA attempts) was performed in 24% of the stent group and in 53% of the PTCA group (p = 0.002). There were no events in the stent group after 8 months, whereas events continued to occur in the PTCA group. By multivariate analysis, allocation to the PTCA group, left anterior descending coronary artery lesion and lesion length were significantly related to the development of major adverse cardiac events.Conclusions. These data demonstrate the long-term safety and clinical benefit of stenting recanalized chronic occlusions. There is a continued risk of late clinical events related to nonstented lesions. Implantation of an intracoronary stent should therefore be considered after successful opening of a chronic coronary occlusion.     

Stenting in chronic coronary occlusion (SICCO): A randomized,controlled trial of adding stent implantation after successful angioplasty

Objectives. This study investigated whether stenting improves long-term results after recanalization of chronic coronary occlusions.Background. Restenosis is common after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of chronic coronary occlusions. Stenting has been suggested as a means of improving results, but its use has not previously been investigated in a randomized trial.Methods. We randomly assigned 119 patients with a satisfactory result after successful recanalization by PTCA of a chronic coronary occlusion to 1) a control (PTCA) group with no other intervention, or 2) a group in which PTCA was followed by implantation of Palmaz-Schatz stents with full anticoagulation. Coronary angiography was performed before randomization, after stenting and at 6-month follow-up.Results. Inguinal bleeding was more frequent in the stent group. There were no deaths. One patient with stenting had a myocardial infarction. Subacute occlusion within 2 weeks occurred in four patients in the stent group and in three in the PTCA group. At follow-up, 57% of patients with stenting were free from angina compared with 24% of patients with PTCA only (p < 0.001). Angiographic follow-up data were available in 114 patients. Restenosis (≥50% diameter stenosis) developed in 32% of patients with stenting and in 74% of patients with PTCA only (p < 0.001); reocclusion occurred in 12% and 26%, respectively (p = 0.058). Minimal lumen diameter (mean ± SD) at follow-up was 1.92 ± 0.95 mm and 1.11 ± 0.78 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). Target lesion revascularization within 300 days was less frequent in patients with stenting than in patients with PTCA only (22% vs. 42%, p = 0.025).Conclusions. Stent implantation improved long-term angiographic and clinical results after PTCA of chronic coronary occlusions and is thus recommended regardless of the primary PTCA result.     

Effects of adjunctive balloon angioplasty after intravascular ultrasound-guided optimal directional coronary atherectomy: the result of Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty After Coronary Atherectomy Study (ABACAS).

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate: 1) the effect of adjunctive percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) compared with stand-alone DCA, and 2) the outcome of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided aggressive DCA. BACKGROUND: It has been shown that optimal angiographic results after coronary interventions are associated with a lower incidence ofrestenosis. Adjunctive PTCA after DCA improves the acute angiographic outcome; however, long-term benefits of adjunctive PTCA have not been established. METHODS: Out of 225 patients who underwent IVUS-guided DCA, angiographically optimal debulking was achieved in 214 patients, then theywere randomized to either no further treatment or to added PTCA. RESULTS: Postprocedural quantitative angiographic analysis demonstrated an improved minimum luminal diameter (2.88 +/- 0.48 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.51 mm; p = 0.006) and a less residual stenosis (10.8% vs.15%; p = 0.009) in the adjunctive PTCA group. Quantitative ultrasound analysis showed a larger minimum luminal diameter (3.26 +/- 0.48 vs. 3.04 +/- 0.5 mm; p < 0.001) and lower residual plaque mass in the adjunctive PTCA group (42.6% vs. 45.6%; p < 0.001). Despite the improved acute findings in the adjunctive PTCA group, six-month angiographic and clinical results were not different. The restenosis rate (adjunctive PTCA 23.6%, DCA alone 19.6%; p = ns) and target lesion revascularization rate (20.6% vs. 15.2%; p = ns) did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: With IVUS guidance, aggressive DCA can safely achieve optimal angiographic results with low residual plaque mass, and this was associated with a low restenosis rate. Although adjunctive PTCA after optimal DCA improved the acute quantitative coronary angiography and quantitative coronary ultrasonography outcomes, its benefit was not maintained at six months.     

Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison with bare metal stent implantation

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the clinical and angiographic outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and bare metal stent (BMS) implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis. BACKGROUND: The safety and effectiveness of SES implantation for unprotected LMCA stenosis have not been ascertained. METHODS: Elective SES implantation for de novo unprotected LMCA stenosis was performed in 102 consecutive patients with preserved left ventricular function from March 2003 to March 2004. Data from this group were compared to those from 121 patients treated with BMS during the preceding two years. RESULTS: Compared to the BMS group, the SES group received more direct stenting, had fewer debulking atherectomies, had a greater number of stents, had more segments stented, and underwent more bifurcation stenting. The procedural success rate was 100% for both groups. There were no incidents of death, stent thrombosis, Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), or emergent bypass surgery during hospitalization in either group. Despite less acute gain (2.06 +/- 0.56 mm vs. 2.73 +/- 0.73 mm, p < 0.001) in the SES group, SES patients showed a lower late lumen loss (0.05 +/- 0.57 mm vs. 1.27 +/- 0.90 mm, p < 0.001) and a lower six-month angiographic restenosis rate (7.0% vs. 30.3%, p < 0.001) versus the BMS group. At 12 months, the rate of freedom from death, MI, and target lesion revascularization was 98.0 +/- 1.4% in the SES group and 81.4 +/- 3.7% in the BMS group (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for unprotected LMCA stenosis appears safe with regard to acute and midterm complications and is more effective in preventing restenosis compared to BMS implantation.