Capsule endoscopy: a comprehensive review

The development of wireless capsule endoscopy (CE) has been a significant technologic advancement for the non-invasive visual evaluation of the entire small bowel and esophagus. The capsule endoscope is disposable and measures 11 x 26 mm. There are two capsule endoscopes currently available: PillCam ESO and PillCam SB for the evaluation of the esophagus and the small bowel, respectively. The PillCam ESO has two cameras on each end and captures images 7 frames per second per each camera, while the PillCam SB has one camera and captures images at a rate of 2 frames per second. Both capsule endoscopes transmit the image data using a radiofrequency signal to a recording device worn on the patient's waist. Once image acquisition is completed, the data from the recording device is downloaded to a computer workstation and analyzed by a gastroenterologist. Common indications for the small bowel CE include obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), suspected Crohn disease (CD), as well as other suspected small bowel pathologies, while indications for the esophageal CE include screening of Barrett esophagus and esophageal varices. Small bowel CE appears to be more sensitive in the evaluation of OGIB and small bowel CD compared with other conventional radiological and endoscopic modalities. Preliminary results for the esophageal CE reveal good accuracy for screening of both Barrett and esophageal varices. CE is well tolerated by most patients, requires no sedation, and carries few side effects. One of the complications of CE is capsule retention; however, a patency capsule system has been developed, which can indicate whether an obstructing lesion is present before CE is performed. Finally, there are preliminary data suggesting that a new capsule endoscope for the colon may be useful in the evaluation of patients for colon polyps and possibly, screening for colon cancer.     

Capsule endoscopy: past,present, and future

A capsule endoscope is a swallowable wireless miniature camera for getting images of the gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa. The initial capsule endoscope model was developed by Given Imaging and approved in Western countries in 2001. Before the introduction of capsule endoscopy (CE) and double-balloon endoscopy (DBE), there was no effective modality for the evaluation and management of patients with obscure GI bleeding. Obscure GI bleeding is defined as bleeding of unknown origin that persists or recurs after a negative initial or primary endoscopy (colonoscopy or upper endoscopy) result. The first capsule endoscope model, which is now regarded as a first-line tool for the detection of abnormalities of the small bowel, was the PillCam SB. It was approved in Japan in April 2007. The main indication for use of the PillCam SB is obscure GI bleeding. Almost the only complication of CE is capsule retention, which is the capsule remaining in the digestive tract for a minimum of 2 weeks. A retained capsule can be retrieved by DBE. There are some limitations of CE in that it cannot be used to obtain a biopsy specimen or for endoscopic treatment. However, the combination of a PillCam SB and DBE seems to be the best strategy for management of obscure GI bleeding. Recently, several new types of capsule endoscope have been developed, such as Olympus CE for the small bowel, PillCam ESO for investigation of esophageal diseases, and PillCam COLON for detection of colonic neoplasias. In the near future, CE is expected to have a positive impact on many aspects of GI disease evaluation and management.     

Video capsule endoscopy: Perspectives of a revolutionary technique

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) was launched in 2000 and has revolutionized direct endoscopic imaging of the gut. VCE is now a first-line procedure for exploring the small bowel in cases of obscure digestive bleeding and is also indicated in some patients with Crohn’s disease, celiac disease, and polyposis syndrome. A video capsule has also been designed for visualizing the esophagus in order to detect Barrett’s esophagus or esophageal varices. Different capsules are now available and differ with regard to dimensions, image acquisition rate, battery life, field of view, and possible optical enhancements. More recently, the use of VCE has been extended to exploring the colon. Within the last 5 years, tremendous developments have been made toward increasing the capabilities of the colon capsule. Although colon capsule cannot be proposed as a first-line colorectal cancer screening procedure, colon capsule may be used in patients with incomplete colonoscopy or in patients who are unwilling to undergo colonoscopy. In the near future, new technological developments will improve the diagnostic yield of VCE and broaden its therapeutic capabilities.     

The colon - the latest terrain for capsule endoscopy.

Colonoscopy is the gold standard for evaluating pathologies of the large bowel, including screening for colorectal cancer. The technological features of current colonoscopes have not progressed much in recent years except for improved image and video display. The technique requires intubation and insufflation of the colon which are operator-dependent and involve a learning curve. Colonoscopy is an invasive procedure whose overall risk of complications is approximately 0.3%, increasing to 2% when polypectomy is performed. The PillCam Colon capsule endoscope (Given Imaging Ltd., Yoqneam, Israel) was developed for use as a safe, minimally invasive, non-sedation requiring, patient-friendly modality to visualize the colon. Only the interpretation of findings requires expertise. PillCam capsule endoscopy could be an alternative approach to colonoscopy for screening large populations. We report the first clinical investigations of the safety, feasibility and performance of colon capsule endoscopy compared with standard colonoscopy.     

Capsule endoscopy: technique and indications

Since it was introduced in 2000, capsule endoscopy has become the gold standard for endoscopic examination of the small bowel in several clinical situations such as obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, suspicion of Crohn's disease, and surveillance of polyposis syndromes. In this technique a miniaturised endoscope, embedded in a swallowable capsule, is propelled through the gut by peristalsis and reaches the right colon in 5-8h. Images captured by the capsule are recorded on a hard drive in a belt worn by the patient. In addition to the extensive literature currently available on small bowel CE, new capsule devices are currently under evaluation for the examination of the colon with the purpose of screening for colorectal cancer, and of the oesophagus for screening for oesophageal varices and Barrett's oesophagus. These latter indications currently remain under evaluation. This review considers the technical aspects of capsule endoscopy and discusses the indications. Issues of safety and tolerance are also discussed.     

Esophageal capsule endoscopy

Capsule endoscopy is now considered as the first imaging tool for small bowel examination. Recently, new capsule endoscopy applications have been developed, such as esophageal capsule endoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy. Esophageal capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected esophageal disorders is feasible and safe, and could be also an alternative procedure in those patients refusing upper endoscopy. Although large-scale studies are needed to confirm its utility in GERD and cirrhotic patients, current results are encouraging and open a new era in esophageal examination.     

Capsule endoscopy in pediatrics: A 10-years journey

Video capsule endoscopy(CE) for evaluation the esophagus(ECE), small bowel(SBCE) and the colon(CCE) is particularly useful in pediatrics, because this imaging modality does not require ionizing radiation, deep sedation or general anesthesia. The risk of capsule retention appears to be dependent on indication rather than age and parallels the adult experience by indication, making SBCE a relatively safe procedure with a significant diagnostic yield. The newest indication, assessment of mucosal change, greatly enhances and expands its potential benefit. The diagnostic role of CE extends beyond the SB. The use of ECE also may enhance our knowledge of esophageal disease and assist patient care. Colon CCE is a novel minimally invasive and painless endoscopic technique allowing exploration of the colon without need for sedation, rectal intubation and gas insufflation. The limited data on ECE and CCE in pediatrics does not yet allow the same conclusions regarding efficacy; however, both appear to provide safe methods to assess and monitor mucosal change in their respective areas with little discomfort. Moreover, although experience has been limited, the patency capsule may help lessen the potential of capsule retention; and newly researched protocols for bowel cleaning may further enhance CE’s diagnostic yield. However, further research is needed to optimize the use of the various CE procedures in pediatric populations.     

上消化道胶囊内镜发展与创新北大核心CSCD

上消化道疾病高发,传统插管式胃镜是检查上消化道疾病最常用的检查方法和"金标准"。为了更舒适无创的检查上消化道黏膜,多项研究提出了上消化道胶囊内镜的概念,但是由于上消化道各部位解剖与生理结构的差异,目前可以使用的胶囊内镜如单纯被动式、磁控式、线控式、磁控联合线控式以及侧视胶囊内镜都存在一定的局限性,无法实现对上消化道整体黏膜情况的观察。文章试图通过介绍适用于食管、胃以及十二指肠检测的胶囊内镜,分析各内镜的诊断效能及其不足,探讨未来上消化道胶囊内镜可能的发展方向。     

Capsule endoscopy--state of the art

Capsule endoscopy is a new technology that was recently introduced into clinical practice for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases. As of today, three different capsule types have been produced, designed for the exploration of the small bowel (PillCam SB), the esophagus (PillCam ESO) and the colon (PillCam Colon). The PillCam SB has gained widespread acceptance as a powerful tool for the diagnosis of bleeding from the small bowel as well as for other indications. The PillCam ESO has been used to study patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, for the screening of Barrett's esophagus, and for the screening and surveillance of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. The results of the pilot studies carried out with this capsule have been encouraging. Large-scale studies are ongoing. The evaluation of the potential of the PillCam Colon capsule is still in its infancy: the two pilot studies published showed that this capsule can produce high-quality images of the colon. The potential of this capsule for clinical purposes, such as colon cancer screening, needs to be evaluated.     

Colon capsule endoscopy

Wireless capsule endoscopy has become the first imaging tool for small bowel examination. Recently, new capsule endoscopy applications have been developed, such as esophageal capsule endoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy. Clinical trials results have shown that colon capsule endoscopy is feasible, accurate and safe in patients suffering from colonic diseases. It could be a good alternative in patients refusing conventional colonoscopy or when it is contraindicated. Upcoming studies are needed to demonstrate its utility for colon cancer screening and other indications such us ulcerative colitis. Comparative studies including both conventional and virtual colonoscopy are also required.     

How much helpful is the capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis of small bowel lesions？

AIM: To assess the practically usefulness and diagnostic yield of this new method in a group of patients with suspected small bowel lesions. METHODS: Capsule endoscopic (CE) examination by using M2A capsule endoscope TM (Given Imaging, Yoqneam, Israel) was performed in thirty nine patients (26 males, 13 females) with suspected small intestinal lesions. The composing of the patients was as follows: obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in twenty three patients, known Crohn's disease in 6 patients, in whom CE was used to evaluate the severity and extension of the diseases, chronic diarrhea in 8 patients, abdominal pain in one patient and malignancy in one patient with unknown origin. RESULTS: In two patients CE failed. Different abnormalities were revealed in 26 patients overall. Detection rate of abnormalities was highest among patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and the source of bleeding was demonstrated in 17 of 23 patients with obscure bleeding (73.9%). Entero-Behcet was diagnosed in two patients by CE as a source of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. In 6 patients with known Crohn's disease, CE revealed better evaluation of the disease extension. In 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients with chronic diarrhea; CE revealed some mucosal abnormalities as the cause of chronic diarrhea. In a patient with unexplained abdominal pain and in a cancer patient with unknown origin, CE examination was normal. CONCLUSION: In our relatively small series, we found that capsule endoscopy is a useful diagnostic tool particularly in diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, chronic diarrhea and in estimating the extension of Crohn's disease.     

The future of wireless capsule endoscopy

We outline probable and possible developments with wireless capsule endoscopy. It seems likely that capsule endoscopy will become increasingly effective in diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy. This will be attractive to patients especially for cancer or varices detection because capsule endoscopy is painless and is likely to have a higher take up rate compared to conventional colonoscopy and gastroscopy. Double imager capsules with increased frame rates have been used to image the esophagus for Barrett＇s and esophageal varices. The image quality is not bad but needs to be improved if it is to become a realistic substitute for flexible upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. An increase in the frame rate, angle of view, depth of field, image numbers, duration of the procedure and improvements in illumination seem likely. Colonic, esophageal and gastric capsules will improve in quality, eroding the supremacy of flexible endoscopy, and become embedded into screening programs. Therapeutic capsules will emerge with brushing, cytology, fluid aspiration, biopsy and drug delivery capabilities. Electrocautery may also become possible. Diagnostic capsules will integrate physiological measurements with imaging and optical biopsy, and immunologic cancer recognition. Remote control movement will improve with the use of magnets and/or electrostimulation and perhaps electromechanical methods. External wireless commands will influence capsule diagnosis and therapy and will increasingly entail the use of real-time imaging. However, it should be noted that speculations about the future of technology in any detail are almost always wrong.     

Colon capsule endoscopy: Current status and future directions

Colon capsule endoscopy(CCE; Pill Cam Colon; Given Imaging; Yoqneam, Israel) is a minimally invasive wireless technique for the visualization of the colon. With the recent introduction of the second generation colon capsule the diagnostic accuracy of CCE for polyp detection has significantly improved and preliminary data suggest it may be useful to monitor mucosal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Limitations include the inability to take biopsies and the procedural costs. However, given the potentially higher acceptance within an average risk colorectal cancer(CRC) screening population, its usefulness as a screening tool with regard to CRC prevention should be further evaluated.     

Wireless capsule endoscopy for pediatric small-bowel diseases

OBJECTIVE: Although capsule endoscopy (CE) is becoming an increasingly popular procedure, only recently data on its clinical application in pediatric gastroenterology are just emerging. Our aim is to investigate the diagnostic value of CE in small intestine diseases and to determine its safety, tolerance, and applicability in a large number of pediatric patients referred to our Tertiary Center of Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, University of Parma. METHODS: A total of 87 Italian patients, 49 of which were male with an age range from 18 months to 18 yr with a suspected small-bowel disease (inflammatory bowel disease 37%, polyps 38%, obscure gastrointestinal bleeding 24%, malabsorption 1%), were investigated with the M2A capsule (GIVEN((R)) Imaging Ltd., Yoqneam, Israel). RESULTS: A total of 77 patients swallowed the capsule, while in 10 it was endoscopically positioned (age range 1.5-11 yr, median age 5.3 yr). Eighty patients naturally evacuated the capsule, one patient needed surgery. The capsule evidenced pathological findings in 62 patients (71%), ileal lymphoid nodular hyperplasia in four subjects (5%), it was negative in 18 subjects (21%), and technically failed in three subjects (3%). In 21 out of 28 patients with known polyposis and in all the five patients with suspected polyposis, small-bowel polyps were found. In 16 out of 22 patients suffering from known inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease colitis or indeterminate colitis), small intestine lesions were found. CE examination identified a possible small intestine bleeding source in 13 out of 21 patients with suspected obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. In 5 out of 10 patients with suspected small-bowel inflammatory disease, CE evidenced ileum lesions suggesting Crohn's disease, which was subsequently confirmed through diagnostic procedures and the clinical history. A patient with malabsorption presented a negative capsule study. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience, which includes the largest number of pediatric patients and the youngest child reported in literature, confirms that CE is a very useful system for the clinical work in suspected small-bowel diseases in infancy. The high rate of positive examination is due to the very careful selection of the patients, obligatory to conduct a safe examination since CE is not highly tested in children.     

Meta-analysis of capsule endoscopy in patients diagnosed or suspected with esophageal varices

The PillCam ESO(Given Imaging,Israel) or esophageal capsule endoscopy(ECE) is a novel technique used in the diagnostic evaluation of esophagus.Many studies have been performed to compare the accuracy of ECE against the current gold standard esophagogastro-duodenoscopy and a meta-analysis recently published by Lu et al suggests that ECE may have an acceptable sensitivity and specificity in detecting esophageal varices.We would like to discuss the importance and implication of publication bias in this meta-an...     

Darier's disease with esophageal involvement

Abstract

Objective. Nowadays, capsule endoscopy (CE) is the first-line procedure after negative upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Approximately, two-thirds of patients undergoing CE for OGIB will have a small-bowel abnormality. However, several patients who underwent CE for OGIB had the source of their blood loss in the stomach or in the colon. The aim of the present study is to determine the incidence of bleeding lesions missed by the previous gastroscopy/colonoscopy with CE and to evaluate the indication to repeat a new complete endoscopic workup in subjects related to a tertiary center for obscure bleeding before CE. Methods and methods. We prospectively reviewed data from 637/1008 patients underwent to CE for obscure bleeding in our tertiary center after performing negative gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Results. CE revealed a definite or likely cause of bleeding in stomach in 138/637 patients (yield 21.7%) and in the colon in 41 patients (yield 6.4%) with a previous negative gastroscopy and colonoscopy, respectively. The lesions found were outside the small bowel in only 54/637 (8.5%) patients. In 111/138 patients, CE found lesions both in stomach and small bowel (small-bowel erosions in 54, AVMs in 45, active small-bowel bleeding in 4, neoplastic lesions in 3 and distal ileum AVMs in 5 patients). In 24/41 (58.5%) patients, CE found lesions both in small bowel and colon (multiple small-bowel erosions in 15; AVMs in 8 and neoplastic lesion in 1 patients. All patients underwent endoscopic therapy or surgery for their nonsmall-bowel lesions. Conclusions. Lesions in upper or lower GI tract have been missed in about 28% of patients submitted to CE for obscure bleeding. CE may play an important role in identifying lesions missed at conventional endoscopy.     

Endoscopic examination of the upper esophagus by withdrawal of endoscope over guide wire.

Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy is an important diagnostic modality in evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. However, lesions located in the cricopharyngeal area and upper esophagus can be missed, as this area may not be well visualized during endoscopy. This study was conducted to study the utility of a new technique of endoscopic examination of the upper esophagus by withdrawal of endoscope over guide wire in diagnosing esophageal disorders. Patients with suspected upper esophageal disorders on history and radiological investigations were assessed using guide wire assisted endoscopic examination during withdrawal of the endoscope. In this technique, endoscope is inserted into the esophagus under vision and thereafter the whole of esophagus, stomach and proximal duodenum is examined. The endoscope is then withdrawn into the mid-esophagus, a guide wire is fed into the biopsy channel, and thereafter inserted into the esophagus. Once guide wire has been advanced into the esophagus, the endoscope is withdrawn gently over the guide wire into esophagus carefully examining for lesions in upper esophagus and cricopharyngeal area. Twenty cases of various abnormalities localized to the upper esophagus were studied. The final diagnosis in these patients was cervical esophageal web (10), post transhiatal esophagectomy leak (4), heterotopic gastric mucosa (3), posttraumatic esophageal perforation (2), and Zenker's diverticulum (1). Intact web was detected in 2 patients and in 8 patients fractured web was seen. Guide wire assisted examination of upper esophagus improved the ability to visualize and characterize these lesions and no complications were encountered as a result of this procedure. Endoscopic examination of the upper esophagus by withdrawal of endoscope over guide wire is safe and effective in diagnosing anatomical abnormalities of the upper esophagus that may be missed or poorly characterized during standard endoscopy.     

10 years of capsule endoscopy: an update

Capsule endoscopy (CE) has evolved in a few short years to become a first-line, noninvasive diagnostic technique for the small bowel. CE is now being utilized worldwide to assess patients for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, possible Crohn’s disease, celiac disease and small bowel tumors. The device is now used in tandem with balloon enteroscopy to direct therapeutic interventions. Alterations and improvements in CE have also led to the evaluation of both the esophagus and colon. It can be anticipated that in the near future pan CE of the entire GI tract will be performed, as well as possible tissue acquisition, drug delivery and therapeutic interventions.     

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding from multiple Barrett's ulcers associated with metachronous multiple colorectal carcinomas

Although gastroesophageal reflux disease is sometimes associated with esophageal ulcer and/or mucosal erosion, acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding from an esophageal ulcer is uncommon. We report a case of acute gastrointestinal bleeding from one of multiple esophageal ulcers in extensive Barrett's esophagus in the postoperative period after low anterior resection performed for descending colon carcinoma. A 74-year-old Japanese woman had undergone sigmoid colon resection 6 years earlier. The patient had a history of repeated reflux esophagitis. She was referred to a local hospital for a simple health screening 5 years after surgery. The patient had noticed bloody stool and felt mild difficulty at defecation 2 weeks before admission. Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy performed at a local hospital revealed a type 2 tumor located approximately 15 cm from the anal verge, which was obviously the cause of the bloody stool and constipation. The patient was admitted to our hospital for surgical treatment. Ten days after the low anterior resection, upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed multiple ulcers in the lower esophagus, which had caused the bleeding. Endoscopic biopsy revealed that esophageal ulcer occurred in the Barrett's esophagus, extending 15 cm from the functional esophagogastric junction. This case highlights acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding from multiple Barrett's ulcers in extensive Barrett's epithelium occurring in the postoperative period of colorectal carcinoma, and indicates an association of Barrett's esophagus with metachronous multiple colon carcinoma.     

Complete small-bowel transit in patients undergoing capsule endoscopy: determining factors and improvement with metoclopramide

BACKGROUND: Passage of the capsule endoscope to the colon occurs in only approximately three quarters of patients. This study assessed factors that might influence the completeness of small-bowel transit, including orally administered metoclopramide. METHODS: Clinical and procedural parameters were recorded prospectively for 150 patients undergoing capsule endoscopy. Metoclopramide was not administered to the first 83 patients (Group 1) but was given orally (10 mg) to the subsequent 67 (Group 2). RESULTS: Small-bowel transit was complete in 63 patients in Group 1 (76%). Gastric transit time was significantly longer when the capsule did not reach the colon than when it did (114.9 +/- 32.6 minutes vs. 26.6 +/- 2.9 minutes; p=0.007). Small-bowel transit time also was longer. The likelihood of complete small-bowel passage was not predicted by any clinical or procedural factor. In Group 2 (metoclopramide), the capsule reached the colon in 65 (97%) patients (OR 10.3: 95% CI[2.32, 93.55], p <0.001). This improvement was associated with a significant reduction in gastric transit time (47.9 +/- 9.0 minutes vs. 30.8 +/- 7.5 minutes; p=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Metoclopramide increases the likelihood of a complete small-bowel examination in patients undergoing capsule endoscopy.