Recommendation and Acceptance of Counselling for Familial Cancer Risk in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Cases

BackgroundIn clinical routine, not every patient who is offered genetic counselling and diagnostics in order to investigate a familial cancer risk predisposition opts for it. Little is known about acceptance of counselling and testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer cases in Germany.MethodsAll primary breast cancer cases and patients with DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ) treated at the University Hospital of Dresden between 2016 and 2019 were included. The number of tumor board recommendations for genetic counselling on the basis of the GC-HBOC risk criteria was recorded. Acceptance was analyzed by number of cases with counselling in the GC-HBOC-Center Dresden.ResultsOf 996 primary breast cancer and DCIS cases, 262 (26.3%) were eligible for genetic counselling. Recommendation for genetic counselling was accepted by 64.1% (168/262). Of these 90.5% (152/168) opted for molecular genetic analysis. The acceptance rate for counselling increased between 2016 and 2019 from 58.3 to 72.6%. Altogether, 20.4% (31/152) patients were found to carry a pathogenic variant in the breast cancer genes BRCA1 or BRCA2.ConclusionAcceptance of recommendation is increasing as clinical consequences augment. Optimization in providing information about hereditary cancer risk and in accessibility of counselling and testing is required to further improve acceptance of recommendation.     

From BRCA1 to Polygenic Risk Scores: Mutation-Associated Risks in Breast Cancer-Related Genes

BackgroundThere has been huge progress over the last 30 years in identifying the familial component of breast cancer.SummaryCurrently around 20% is explained by the high-risk genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, a further 2% by other high-penetrance genes, and around 5% by the moderate risk genes ATM and CHEK2. In contrast, the more than 300 low-penetrance single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) now account for around 28% and they are predicted to account for most of the remaining 45% yet to be found. Even for high-risk genes which confer a 40–90% risk of breast cancer, these SNP can substantially affect the level of breast cancer risk. Indeed, the strength of family history and hormonal and reproductive factors is very important in assessing risk even for a BRCA carrier. The risks of contralateral breast cancer are also affected by SNP as well as by the presence of high or moderate risk genes. Genetic testing using gene panels is now commonplace.Key-MessagesThere is a need for a more parsimonious approach to panels only testing those genes with a definite 2-fold increased risk and only testing those genes with challenging management implications, such as CDH1 and TP53, when there is strong clinical indication to do so. Testing of SNP alongside genes is likely to provide a more accurate risk assessment.     

Identification of twenty-nine novel germline unclassified variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 1400 Italian individuals

ObjectivesBreast and/or ovarian cancers are complex multifactorial diseases caused by interaction of both genetic and non-genetic factors and characterized by predisposition to inheritance. BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are the most clinically involved with these kinds of cancer and the spectrum of variants affecting these genes is very wide. In fact, point variants, large or small insertions/deletions, genomic rearrangements can be found in these patients, although a large number of variants with uncertain biological and clinical significance continues to be identified. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology is actually the most powerful tool for the discovering of causative mutations and novel disease genes, moreover it allows to make a rapid diagnosis of genetic variants giving fast, inexpensive and detailed genetic information.Material and methodsIn this study, we report the screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes on 1400 consecutive Caucasian patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer history or family risk, attending the oncogenetic ambulatory at the Foundation Policlinico Agostino Gemelli in Rome.ResultsWe describe twenty-nine novel BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants detected in Italian individuals suffering from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC).ConclusionData regarding novel variants can provide useful information not only at epidemiological but also at clinical level, allowing for the better managing of breast and ovarian cancer patients and their family members.     

Assessing the Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Risk in our Region of Southeastern Georgia

Abstract: Genetic testing for the breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, has been available for over a decade. Positive test results carry significant medical, psychological, and social implications. Knowledge of the public’s awareness concerning BRCA testing, and perceived benefits and barriers to testing can help refine educational programs and identify subgroups needing additional support. Patients and their acquaintances with a breast complaint attending a surgical clinic or private office were asked to complete a questionnaire about their knowledge of breast cancer genes and their desire to be tested. Demographic information collected included ethnicity, education background, age, income, and personal and family history of breast cancer, knowledge of BRCA genes and testing, and their willingness to participate in genetic counseling. A total of 222 people completed the questionnaire that showed the majority of subjects in southeast Georgia believe breast cancer is inherited 26–50% of the time. Caucasians and those with advanced degrees are the most informed regarding awareness of BRCA genes (p < 0.05); the least informed groups include African Americans and those with no more than a college education. Participants with a family history of breast cancer were significantly more likely to know that genes had been identified that indicate an increased risk of breast cancer (p < 0.05). A history of breast cancer did not impact the degree of awareness (p > 0.05). Subjects aware of genetic testing are more willing to utilize counseling (p < 0.05). Perceptions of breast cancer inheritance, awareness of susceptibility genes, and availability of testing and counseling are not uniform among all population subgroups. In southeast Georgia, educational efforts should focus on the less educated and minority groups.     

Awareness and Availability of Routine Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation Testing in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer in Germany

IntroductionDiagnostic testing of germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 or 2 (gBRCA1/2) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC; locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer) is necessary to assess eligibility for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). We investigated awareness, clinical practice, and the availability of gBRCA1/2 mutation testing in the German outpatient oncology setting.MethodsOffice-based oncologists completed a 23-item online survey. Responses were evaluated collectively and by center type.ResultsOf 50 oncologists, 33 and 17 were medical and gynecological oncologists, respectively. Oncologists treated a median of 65 (range 14–350) patients with ABC per year. The strongest decision factors to initiate gBRCA1/2 mutation testing were: patient''s known family history of gBRCA1/2 mutation-related cancer(s), guideline recommendations, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In routine practice, 86% of oncologists tested for gBRCA1/2 mutations. Most oncologists (76–98%) reported testing patients with a known family history of gBRCA1/2 mutation-related cancer(s) irrespective of receptor status. For unknown family history, 92% of oncologists reported testing patients with advanced TNBC versus 30% for HR+/HER2− ABC. Oncologists (66%) rated the awareness of therapeutic relevance of gBRCA1/2 mutation testing for targeted treatment selection as good to satisfactory; 22% rated awareness as poor to in­sufficient.ConclusionDiagnostic gBRCA1/2 mutation testing in patients with HER2− ABC is available and routinely performed in Germany''s outpatient oncology setting. However, specific patient subgroups were not routinely tested despite therapeutic indications. Given PARPi availability, opportunities exist to improve testing rates especially for patients with HR+/HER2− ABC without a known family history of gBRCA1/2 mutation-related cancer(s).     

Hereditary Breast Cancer: Practical Pursuit for Clinical Translation

The benefits of a skillful medical history and histologic confirmation of relevant pathology are potentially lifesaving. Appropriately directed DNA testing based on these initial steps provides an opportunity for clinical translation into a cancer prevention program targeted to family members. Unfortunately, cancer prevention strategies that are based on genetics are frequently overlooked or underestimated in the overall practical management of patients at high risk for breast cancer as well as integral cancers that constitute a hereditary breast cancer syndrome. DNA testing, particularly for BRCA1 and BRCA2 in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome and p53 in the Li-Fraumeni syndrome, and many other syndromes is commercially available for inclusion in a cancer control program and merits attention in this major public health problem. It is clear that the time and effort expended for a hereditary cancer syndrome diagnosis may significantly reduce both morbidity and mortality in breast cancer. We have found that genetic counselors can partner with the clinical physicians and make significant contributions to this labor-intensive effort.     

Clinicopathological characteristics of gene-positive breast cancer in the United Arab Emirates

IntroductionBreast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This is the first study to provide data on predisposition of breast cancer susceptibility genes with associated clinical and pathological aspects in the UAE.Material & methodsA retrospective chart review for breast cancer patients undergoing genetic testing from 2016 to 2018. According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines genetic testing was offered. The analyzed data included; age, ethnicity, family cancer history, pathogenic variant, histopathology, stage, molecular subtype and proliferation.Results309 patients underwent genetic testing with a positive result in 130 patients (11.9%) over a period of 36 months. In 34.6% pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were identified. BRCA2 was the most common gene identified. The mean age was 42.9 years (±9.01). Positive family history was identified in 66 patients (50.7%). Majority had stage 1 or 2 disease (66.2%), invasive ductal carcinoma (81.5%) and hormone receptor positive cancer (45.3%).ConclusionsThis is the first study in the UAE to describe the clinical and pathological characteristics of hereditary breast cancer in a mixed ethnic group with dominant Arabic population. Further genetic studies will be required in the UAE population, as the prevalence of breast cancer continues to rise.     

The breast surgeon's role in BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing

Five percent to 10% of all women who develop breast cancer carry a hereditary mutation in the genes BRCA1 or BRCA2. Genetic testing is now clinically available, and the results of such testing can dramatically alter a patient's risks for an ipsilateral or contralateral primary breast cancer and ovarian cancer. Therefore, genetic testing will become integral in tailoring surveillance, chemoprevention, and surgical management plans for patients at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes. Such results will also impact the cancer risks for the patient's nuclear and extended family members. Surgeons will play a pivotal role in eliciting personal and family histories from patients, determining which of those histories is suggestive of a germline mutation, facilitating referrals for genetic counseling and testing, and incorporating the results of genetic testing into the patient's short- and long-term management plans.     

TGFBR1 Signaling and Breast Cancer

Over the past decade mutations discovered in genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53 and PTEN, have emerged as high-penetrance susceptibility genes and are clinically relevant for determination of breast cancer risk. Genetic counseling and subsequent screening for mutations and gene rearrangement has improved patient outcome through early detection and prophylactic interventions in patients with familial breast cancer syndromes. However, these high-penetrance genes only account for a small fraction of the hereditary linked breast cancers. It is currently believed that low-penetrance susceptibility alleles and/or environmental factors may play an important role in the remaining cases. TGFBR1*6A (*6A) is a common hypomorphic variant of the type I TGF-β receptor gene (TGFBR1) that has been associated with risk for several forms of cancer, in particular breast cancer. Several epidemiological studies have suggested that patients who carry the *6A allele have an increased risk of breast cancer. Furthermore, functional analysis suggests that this mutation alters TGF-β signaling and promotes tumorigenesis. Although a decade of research has provided basic information in regards to the prevalence of this mutation in several cancer types and populations the molecular underpinning of its functional effects are poorly understood. A better understanding of the molecular mechanism of TGFBR1 signaling in breast cancer may have an impact on breast cancer risk assessment and breast cancer prevention.     

Clinical Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer Syndromes

Over the past 15 years there has been substantial improvement in the understanding of hereditary breast cancer. Germline genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, PTEN and TP53 allows for the identification of individuals at increased risk for breast, ovarian and other cancers. Advances in screening, prevention and treatment have led to improved clinical management which is best defined for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. The addition of screening techniques such as breast magnetic resonance imaging has been shown to lead to earlier detection. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy leads to a reduction in the risk of both ovarian cancer and breast cancer and also is associated with an improvement in overall survival. BRCA1/2 mutation status may be applicable to systemic therapy decisions. Preclinical and early clinical research suggests that specific classes of chemotherapy may be more effective in mutation carriers. Finally, PARP inhibitors represent a novel therapeutic strategy that exploits the weaknesses of BRCA1/2-associated malignancies.     

Survival and Recurrence After Breast Cancer in <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1/2</Emphasis> Mutation Carriers

Background: Genetic mutation is responsible for approximately 10% of breast cancers. The purpose of this study was to compare breast cancer survival and recurrence rates between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and noncarriers.Methods: Using the Columbia Presbyterian breast cancer database, we collected the tissue blocks of all patients younger than 65 years of age and of Jewish descent. The patients were contacted and the data updated. DNA was extracted from the tissue blocks and tested for the common mutations. The results of the genetic mutation and updated database were anonymized and merged. The survival and recurrence rates were compared between mutation carriers and noncarriers.Results: A total of 739 breast cancer cases in 715 patients were identified. We were able to test 487 patients. We identified 30 BRCA1 and 21 BRCA2 mutation carriers, for an incidence of 10.36%. The median follow-up for the patients tested was 50 months. BRCA1 patients more frequently had estrogen- and progesterone-negative tumors and had a higher incidence of positive nodes. BRCA1 patients received chemotherapy more frequently. The incidence of in situ disease was similar for mutation and non–mutation carriers. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers had a higher incidence of bilateral disease. There was no difference in 5- or 10-year overall and breast cancer–specific survival between mutation and non–mutation carriers.Conclusions: Breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations have a similar outcome as non–mutation carriers.     

Prophylaktische Chirurgie des Mamma- und Ovarialkarzinoms

New insights into the genetic basis of carcinogenesis have been obtained by modern molecular biological techniques. Several susceptibility genes are known. The hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2) and endometrial cancer in the context of the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC), germline mutations in mismatch-repair genes, are the most frequent hereditary cancer syndromes in gynaecology. Mutations in TP53 (Li-Fraumeni syndrome) and PTEN (Cowden's disease), associated with increased risk of breast cancer, are responsible for a smaller portion of familial breast cancer.The risk of inheritance and disease can be identified and defined by investigating family history, risk calculation programs, and genetic testing. Afterwards, options of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention can be formulated. Presently, prophylactic surgery is the only option proven by clinical trials that can reduce the mortality of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.     

Breast cancer and ovarian cancer genetics

Breast and ovarian cancers are the second and fifth leading causes of cancer death, respectively, among women in the United States. Individuals with breast cancer have a 20--30% chance of having at least one relative with the disease. However, only 5--10% of the cases are a direct result of germline mutations in highly penetrable genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) as well as genes TP53 and PTEN. Since 1996, genetic testing for these mutations has been clinically available. A strategy for the management of women at increased familial risk of breast and ovarian cancers is described, which includes genetic assessment, chemoprevention, radiologic screening, and clinical and self-examination. Genetic testing should occur within a cancer genetic clinic after genetic counseling. A blood sample allows determination of the presence of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, the TP53 gene, the PTEN gene, and the ATM gene. Tumor examination has identified a growth factor receptor gene, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER-2).With regard to diet and lifestyle, women at increased risk of breast cancer could be advised to reduce dietary fat, avoid obesity, decrease alcohol consumption, and take regular exercise. Although chemoprotection is a valuable consideration, it is important to emphasize that the use of Tamoxifen in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers is not established, nor is the optimum duration of benefit. An overview of the main outcomes of the current published studies confirms a 38% decrease in breast cancer incidence with Tamoxifen but recommends its use be restricted to women at high risk of breast cancer and low risk for potential side effects. The role of bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy or prophylactic mastectomy has been controversial for several reasons, including the psychosocial significance of the breast in Western cultures, the wide acceptance of breast conservation in surgery for early breast cancer, and the previous lack of data on its efficacy. The surgical procedure should aim to remove substantially all at-risk breast tissue. However, there is a balance between reduction of cancer risk and cosmetic outcome. Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy can significantly decrease ovarian cancer risk in women who carry BCRA1 mutations. Oophorectomy lowers the risk of breast cancer, even in women who have previously used hormone replacement therapy. There are no published randomized controlled trials examining the effectiveness of mammographic screening in women under 50 years of age with a family history of breast cancer. However, the published studies do suggest that mammographic screening of a high-risk group of women under 50 years of age may detect cancer at a rate equivalent to that seen in women 10 years older with normal risk. Other initial studies also support MRI as having a greater sensitivity than mammography in high-risk women. Breast clinical and self-examination is often advocated, but its effectiveness is unproved, and only one randomized study has been undertaken in women at risk. On the basis of this study as well as one nonrandomized study, it can be concluded that clinical examination as well as mammography are essential in detecting breast cancer. under 50 years of age with a family history of breast cancer. However, the published studies do suggest that mammographic screening of a high-risk group of women under 50 years of age may detect cancer at a rate equivalent to that seen in women 10 years older with normal risk. Other initial studies also support MRI as having a greater sensitivity than mammography in high-risk women. Breast clinical and self-examination is often advocated, but its effectiveness is unproved, and only one randomized study has been undertaken in women at risk. On the basis of this study as well as one nonrandomized study, it can be concluded that clinical examination as well as mammography are essential in detecting breast cancer.     

Overestimation of hereditary breast cancer risk.

OBJECTIVE: To find out how women with breast or ovarian cancer rate their chances of carrying hereditary factors for these cancers and to determine the extent to which they overestimate their risk. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: BRCA1 and BRCA2 are genes that cause breast and ovarian cancer when they are inherited in families. Testing for disease-associated mutations in these genes is now available commercially. Previous studies have shown that women overestimate their chances of carrying mutations. However, women's perceptions of risk have not been compared to objective estimates or to actual BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing results. METHODS: This study examines estimates of carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among women participating in a randomized trial comparing alternative precounseling educational materials. Estimates were provided by participants in a baseline mailed survey. Estimates given by participants were compared to those given by an expert panel and by a statistical model. Testing was offered free of charge and was done in an academic laboratory using standard techniques. Baseline estimates of participating women were compared to the estimates of the expert panel, to the carrier probability provided by the statistical model, and to actual testing results. RESULTS: Women who have a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer significantly overestimate their risk of carrying hereditary factors for breast and ovarian cancer. Self-estimates exceeded the estimates of experts and a statistical model. One hundred women completed testing, and 21 mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were found. Many test-negative women also overestimated their hereditary risk. Some women with a high carrier probability were negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Overestimation of hereditary factors is common among affected women with a family history of cancer. Pretest education and counseling should reduce these high-risk perceptions. Better estimates of carrier probability will direct more intensive clinical services and research.     

Influence of Race/Ethnicity on Genetic Counseling and Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer

Abstract:  Risk assessment coupled with genetic counseling and testing for the cancer predisposition genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2 ) has become an integral element of comprehensive patient evaluation and cancer risk management in the United States for individuals meeting high-risk criteria for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). For mutation carriers, several options for risk modification have achieved substantial reductions in future cancer risk. However, several recent studies have shown lower rates of BRCA1/2 counseling and testing among minority populations. Here, we explore the role of race/ethnicity in cancer risk assessment, genetic counseling and genetic testing for HBOC and the BRCA1/2 cancer predisposition genes. Barriers to genetic services related to race/ethnicity and underserved populations, including socioeconomic barriers (e.g., time, access, geographic, language/cultural, awareness, cost) and psychosocial barriers (e.g., medical mistrust, perceived disadvantages to genetic services), as well as additional barriers to care once mutation carriers are identified, will be reviewed.     

Rate of BRCA mutation in patients tested under NCCN genetic testing criteria

BackgroundBRCA genetic testing is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) in breast cancer patients who meet specific criteria. Limited data are available on the likelihood of detecting a mutation when these guidelines are followed.MethodsA retrospective chart review examined patients with breast cancer who underwent BRCA testing based on NCCN guidelines.ResultsTwelve (6.0%) of the 199 patients had a deleterious BRCA mutation. Family history of BRCA mutations (50%, p = 0.019), age ≤45 at diagnosis (9.7%, p = 0.034) and meeting ≥3 NCCN criteria (13.3%, p = 0.03) yielded the highest rates of BRCA mutation. Having a family history of BRCA mutation and age ≤45 were associated with increased rate of BRCA mutation on multivariate analysis (OR 14.3, CI 1.2–166.3; OR 11.6, CI 1.2–108.6).ConclusionSelect NCCN criteria are associated with higher rates of BRCA mutations. Waiting for genetic testing results to guide surgical management may be warranted in this subset of patients.     

Practical aspects of genetic counseling in breast cancer: Lights and shadows

In unselected populations, less than 10% of breast cancers are associated with germline mutations in predisposing genes. Breast cancer type 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and BRCA2) susceptibility genes are the most common involved genes and confer a 10–30 times higher risk of developing the disease compared to the general population. A personal or family history suggestive of inherited breast cancer syndrome may be further evaluated to assess the risk of genetic predisposition and the presence of a genetic mutation. Breast cancer genetic counseling should include a careful risk assessment with associated psychosocial evaluation and support, possible molecular testing, personalized discussion of results. Knowledge of BRCA status can influence individualized cancer risk-reduction strategies. i.e. active surveillance, prophylactic surgery and/or pharmacoprevention.     

Hereditary Breast Cancer: Risk Assessment Is the Easy Part

Individuals who seek genetic testing to determine hereditary risk of breast cancer may not be aware that genetic testing is uninformative in many high-risk families or that they may be at increased risk of other cancers as well. Many mistakenly believe that current genetic testing provides definitive information about the magnitude of cancer risk to carriers. This article describes the assessment of hereditary risk by pedigree analysis, epidemiology, and genetic testing within the cancer risk assessment and counseling setting, and discusses other information that helps patients to make informed health care decisions. Because the risk of ovarian cancer is increased in many families at high risk of breast cancer, information about prophylactic oophorectomy and hormone replacement therapy is essential. A case history is presented to show the efficacy of cancer risk assessment and counseling when genetic testing is uninformative. ▪     

Survey on Physicians' Knowledge and Training Needs in Genetic Counseling in Germany

BackgroundIn recent years, germline testing of women with a risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer has increased rapidly. This is due to lower costs for new high-throughput sequencing technologies and the manifold preventive and therapeutic options for germline mutation carriers. The growing demand for genetic counseling meets a shortfall of counselors and illustrates the need to involve the treating clinicians in the genetic testing process. This survey was undertaken to assess their state of knowledge and training needs in the field of genetic counseling and testing.MethodsA cross-sectional survey within the European Bridges Study (Breast Cancer Risk after Diagnostic Gene Sequencing) was conducted among physician members (n = 111) of the German Cancer Society who were primarily gynecologists. It was designed to examine their experience in genetic counseling and testing.ResultsOverall, the study revealed a need for training in risk communication and clinical recommendations for persons at risk. One-third of respondents communicated only relative disease risks (31.5%) instead of absolute disease risks in manageable time spans. Moreover, almost one-third of the respondents (31.2%) communicated bilateral and contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy as an option for healthy women and unilateral-diseased breast cancer patients without mutations in high-risk genes (e.g. BRCA1 or BRCA2). Most respondents expressed training needs in the field of risk assessment models, the clinical interpretation of genetic test results, and the decision-making process.ConclusionThe survey demonstrates a gap of genetic and risk literacy in a relevant proportion of physicians and the need for appropriate training concepts.     

Comparison of clinical features and oncologic outcomes between familial non-hereditary and hereditary breast cancer in Korean female patients

BackgroundThe authors compared the clinical features between familial (non-hereditary) and hereditary breast cancer. And we also analyzed their oncologic outcomes to establish appropriate surveillance protocol for familial (non-hereditary) and hereditary breast cancer.MethodsAmong 232 patients with breast cancer who were performed BRCA gene evaluation, twenty-eight patients were diagnosed as hereditary breast cancer with BRCA gene mutation and one-hundred and seventy-six patients were familial (non-hereditary) breast cancer. The clinical characteristics and oncologic outcomes were compared between two groups.ResultsWhile the incidence of multifocality was higher in familial (non-hereditary) breast cancer group (p < 0.001), the bilaterality was higher in hereditary breast cancer group (p < 0.001). And the rate of pathologic complete remission was also significantly higher in hereditary breast cancer group (p = 0.030). The characteristics of tumor were different between familial (non-hereditary) breast cancer and hereditary breast cancer. The oncologic outcome was better in familial (non-hereditary) breast cancer group than hereditary breast cancer group except death.ConclusionThe clinical characteristics of familial (non-hereditary) breast cancer were different from those of hereditary breast cancer but similar to those of sporadic breast cancer. The prognosis of the familial (non-hereditary) breast cancer was significantly better than hereditary breast cancer.