Fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser combined with topical tretinoin for the treatment of different forms of cystic acne

Nodulocystic acne is prone to scarring and difficult to treat with treatments other than oral isotretinoin. The aim of this article is to discuss the role of a single session of a fractional carbon dioxide (CO₂) laser combined with a topical treatment with a tretinoin and antibiotic gel for a month as a successful treatment to improve nodulocystic acne and chronic microcystic acne. Two cases were involved: the first with nodulocystic acne lesions that persisted after oral retinoids and the second with chronic microcystic acne resistant to topical treatments. After only one session of treatment with the CO₂ laser and the topical treatment, a complete healing of the nodulocystic acne lesions was observed with minimal secondary effects. The microcystic acne showed great improvement. No other topical or oral treatment was needed. This treatment could be a safe and effective treatment for nodulocystic acne lesions and microcystic acne when other treatments fail. More studies should be performed to confirm our results.     

Clinical evaluation of a topical ethyl lactate treatment of acne vulgaris (author's transl)]

The efficacy of a lotion containing 10 p. 100 ethyl lactate was evaluated in a double-blind clinical trail during 8 weeks. Test subjects were 45 male and female patients with polymorphous juvenile acne. They were divided into three groups and received the following treatments: Group A: oral antibiotic + topical placebo lotion. Group B: oral antibiotic + topical ethyl lactate lotion. Group C: topical ethyl lactate lotion only. The lotions were applied twice daily with a swab of cotton-wool. The antibiotic doses (tetracycline hydrochloride) were decreased as the trial progressed. Patients were examined before the trial, then after 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks. At each visit, comedones, microcysts, pustules and nodules were counted on a skin surface of 9 cm2. Colour photographs were taken before and at the end of the trial and served for counting inflammatory lesions. Also, at each visit, skin lipids were sampled and analysed by I. R. spectrophotometry in order to asses the effect of the treatments on the free fatty acid/triglyceride ratio. The treatments showed similar effectiveness as regards comedones and microcysts, but only treatments A and B succeeded in reducing the number of inflamed lesions. With respect to the latter, the combined treatment B (oral antibiotic + topical ethyl lactate lotion) was more effective than treatment A (oral antibiotic + topical placebo); both treatments were more effective than treatment C (topical ethyl lactate lotion only). At the end of the trial, all three groups of patients showed significant overall improvement, but acne scores (total number of lesions) did not differ significantly between treatments. When comparing these results with literature data concerning the effects of vitamin A acid and benzoyl peroxide, it appears that ethyl lactate is slightly less effective for topical treatment of acne than vitamin A acid, but slightly more effective than benzoyl peroxide. It should be underlined that ethyl lactate is well tolerated by the skin. Analysis of sebum samples failed to yield evidence of a decrease in the free fatty acid/triglyceride ratio in skin lipids of the patients irrespective of the treatment applied.     

The efficacy of localized PUVA therapy for chronic hand and foot dermatoses

The response to treatment of all patients enrolled over an 18-month period for localized oral or topical psoralen photochemotherapy (PUVA) of chronic hand and foot dermatoses was retrospectively reviewed. There were broadly similar success rates for the two groups for complete clearance: 61.5% (eight of 13 patients who completed therapy)—oral PUVA, 47.8% (11 of 23 patients who completed therapy)—topical PUVA, and for significant improvement: 23.1% (three of 13 patients)—oral PUVA, 30.4% (seven of 23 patients)—topical PUVA; there were no significant differences in response when diagnostic subgroupings of the hand dermatoses were taken into account. The mean number of treatments (22 for oral PUVA and 24 for topical), treatment durations (122 and 129 days), maximum UVA doses (11.2 and 12.3J/cm²) and to a lesser extent cumulative UVA doses (189.3 and 237.0 J/ cm²) for the therapies were similar in the two groups; adverse effects were minimal for both treatment protocols. However, at least five of the eight patients in the oral PUVA group and five of the 11 in the topical group who cleared completely relapsed after a mean 86 (range 19.245) and 174 (range 23-596) days, respectively. These findings are in broad agreement with those of previous studies. Therefore to avoid generalized photo-sensitivity and a higher likelihood of adverse effects with systemic therapy, as well as a possible slower relapse rate, topical therapy seems preferable.     

The efficacy and safety of treatments for infantile hemangiomas: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Whether infantile hemangiomas (IHs) need to be treated and which treatment should be preferred are still controversial. We aimed to compare and rank the treatments and identify the optimal treatment for IHs. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and other sources for randomized controlled trials up to August 2019. We included trials comparingdifferent treatments and reported response or adverse events rate in IH patients. Two reviewers independently evaluated studies by specific criteria and extracted data. We assessed the risk of bias with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Random-effects were performed for pair-to-pair and Bayesian framework network meta-analyses. The primary outcomes were efficacy and safety. We deemed 20 studies eligible, including 1149 participants and eight interventions. For efficacy, oral propranolol and topical propranolol/timolol were better than observation/placebo (OR, 95% CrI: 17.05, 4.02–94.94; 9.72, 1.91–59.08). For safety, topical propranolol/timolol was significantly better tolerated than oral propranolol (0.05, 0.001–0.66). Cluster analysis demonstrated oral propranolol was the most effective treatment for IHs, while topical propranolol/timolol showed high efficacy and the highest safety. Laser, intralesional propranolol or glucocorticoid, oral glucocorticoid, or captopril had significantly lower priority than oral propranolol or topical propranolol/timolol considering both efficacy and safety. The quality of evidence was rated as moderate or low in most comparisons. This network meta-analysis found topical beta-blockers had the potential to be the most preferable and beneficial option for IHs in consideration of both efficacy and safety.     

Keratoacanthoma centrifugum marginatum after photodynamic therapy with good response to oral retinoids and topical 5‐fluorouracil

Keratoacanthoma centrifugum marginatum (KCM) is a rare variant of keratoacanthoma (KA), characterized by progressive peripheral growth, and usually devoid of deep invasion. Different systemic (oral retinoids) or topical treatments have been reported, but there is not a well‐defined therapeutic protocol. We report the case of a KCM developing after photodynamic therapy (PDT) on the right leg of a 64‐year‐old woman. It was treated successfully with oral acitretin combined with topical 5‐Fluorouracil + salicylic acid for 5 months. This is the first case of KCM developing after PDT and successfully treated with oral retinoid combined with topical treatment.     

Newer Approaches to the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris

The multifactorial etiology of acne vulgaris makes it challenging to treat. Current treatments include topical retinoids, benzoyl peroxide, topical and systemic antibiotics, azelaic acid, and systemic isotretinoin. Adjunctive and/or emerging approaches include topical dapsone, taurine bromamine, resveratrol, chemical peels, optical treatments, as well as complementary and alternative medications. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the therapies available for acne and their latest developments, including new treatment strategies (i.e. re-evaluation of the use of oral antibiotics and avoidance of topical antibiotic monotherapy, use of subantimicrobial antibiotic dosing, use of low-dose isotretinoin, optical treatments), new formulations (microsponges, liposomes, nanoemulsions, aerosol foams), new combinations (fixed-combination products of topical retinoids and topical antibiotics [essentially clindamycin] or benzoyl peroxide), new agents (topical dapsone, taurine bromamine, resveratrol) and their rationale and likely place in treatment. Acne vaccines, topical natural antimicrobial peptides, and lauric acid represent other promising therapies.     

Recent Advances in Acne Pathogenesis: Implications for Therapy

Acne pathogenesis is a multifactorial process that occurs at the level of the pilosebaceous unit. While acne was previously perceived as an infectious disease, recent data have clarified it as an inflammatory process in which Propionibacterium acnes and innate immunity play critical roles in propagating abnormal hyperkeratinization and inflammation. Alterations in sebum composition, and increased sensitivity to androgens, also play roles in the inflammatory process. A stepwise approach to acne management utilizes topical agents for mild to moderate acne (topical retinoid as mainstay ± topical antibiotics) and escalation to oral agents for more resistant cases (oral antibiotics or hormonal agents in conjunction with a topical retinoid or oral isotretinoin alone for severe acne). Concerns over antibiotic resistance and the safety issues associated with isotretinoin have prompted further research into alternative medications and devices for the treatment of acne. Radiofrequency, laser, and light treatments have demonstrated modest improvement for inflammatory acne (with blue-light photodynamic therapy being the only US FDA-approved treatment). However, limitations in study design and patient follow-up render these modalities as adjuncts rather than standalone options. This review will update readers on the latest advancements in our understanding of acne pathogenesis and treatment, with emphasis on emerging treatment options that can help improve patient outcomes.     

Use of permethrin in the treatment of rosacea fulminans during pregnancy: One case report

Rosacea fulminans (RF) is a rare dermatological condition which occurs exclusively in women and it is characterized by a sudden onset of painful papules, pustules, cysts, and nodules on the face. A 28‐year‐old woman was referred to our clinic due to a painful facial eruption within the 13th week of her second pregnancy. After physical examination, the diagnosis of RF during pregnancy was established. Several treatments were used: mupirocin ointment, topical zinc oxide, topical erythromycin, oral erythromycin, metronidazole gel, oral metronidazole, oral amoxiciline, and oral prednisone. Finally, the patient was started on 5% permethrin cream with complete clearing of the lesions. Nowadays, a wide range of treatments for rosacea is available: topical metronidazole, oral metronidazole, topical ivermectin, oral tetracyclines, oral isotretinoin, systemic steroids, photodynamic therapy, or pulsed dye laser. However, in pregnant patients, the treatment alternatives are limited. We consider that 5% permethrin cream could be an effective, cheap, and safe treatment not only in regular patients with rosacea but also in pregnant women, representing an important alternative in the context of pregnancy when therapeutic options are limited. To our knowledge, this is the first case of rosacea treated with 5% permethrin cream in monotherapy during pregnancy.     

Does fasting during Ramadan affect the use of topical dermatological treatment by Muslim patients in the UK?

Background. Ritual fasting during the Muslim religious festival of Ramadan is one of the ‘Five Pillars’ of Islam, and is widely observed by Muslims. Previous studies have highlighted compliance issues in patients prescribed oral medications during this period. Aim. To assess whether fasting during Ramadan influence the use of topical treatments for skin disease in Muslim patients. Methods. This was a prospective, anonymous, questionnaire survey undertaken in a dermatology centre in a tertiary hospital in the UK. Patients were asked if they would use topical treatment while fasting, and whether they would consider this a breach of their fast. Results. We found that more than one‐third of the people interviewed would not use topical treatment while fasting, and around the same number (> 30%) would also consider this a breach of their fast. Although the majority of these patients thought that using steroid‐based topical products was not acceptable, a significant proportion extended this opinion to use of any cream or emollient, and even to light therapy. Gender, age, or educational level were not useful predictors of patient opinion, but there was a significant association with birthplace and likelihood of using topical treatment during Ramadan; patients born outside the UK were significantly (P < 0.01) less likely than those born in the UK to use topical treatment in the fasting period. Conclusions. Our study indicates that fasting may be a significant and a hitherto unrecognised cause of non‐compliance with topical treatment in Muslim patients in the UK, with potential health, quality and cost implications. Ritual fasting during Ramadan is widely observed by Muslims. Previous studies have highlighted compliance issues in patients prescribed oral medications during this period, and it seems this extends to use of topical treatments for skin disease.     

Advances in psoriasis therapy

New uses of older drugs, new combinations of treatments, and new phototherapeutic modalities are enabling clinicians to offer patients safer and more effective treatments. New vehicles for topical delivery of older treatments have created more cosmetically elegant preparations that are better accepted by patients. This article discusses new developments in topical therapy, phototherapy, oral therapy, and injectable therapy for psoriasis.     

An expert view on the treatment of acne with systemic antibiotics and/or oral isotretinoin in the light of the new European recommendations

In 2003 the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products amended the summary product characteristics for oral isotretinoin to standardise information provided from the different countries of the European Community. The Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products recommended that among others, exclusively severe forms of acne (such as nodular or conglobate acne or acne at risk of permanent scarring) resistant to "adequate courses" of standard therapy with systemic antibacterials and local therapy should benefit from oral isotretinoin. However, no indication was provided on what were considered adequate courses or the possibility given to use oral isotretinoin as first line treatment. The aims of the present report were: 1) to provide a specialist view on when it is appropriate to introduce oral isotretinoin as a second line therapy for acne, taking into consideration optimum dosage and duration of systemic antibiotics prior to the start of the oral isotretinoin, and 2) to support the use of oral isotretinoin as first line therapy in specific cases for acne in clinical practice. The recommendations are based on an exhaustive literature review as well as on the personal experience of the members of an European panel of acne specialists. The EEP agreed with the decision made by the CPMP that oral isotretinoin should be administered as 2nd line therapy in those cases of severe acne, which were resistant to or which did not respond successfully to an initial combination regimen with systemic antibiotics and topical treatments (topical retinoids +/- benzoyl peroxide). However, the members emphasized that a number of prognostic factors, as well as psychosocial morbidity should be taken into account when choosing the regimen and that these factors may influence the use of oral isotretinoin as first line therapy.     

Treatment of rosacea

A range of treatment options are available in rosacea, which include several topical (mainly metronidazole, azelaic acid, other antibiotics, sulfur, retinoids) and oral drugs (mainly tetracyclines, metronidazole, macrolides). In some cases, the first choice is a systemic therapy because patients may have sensitive skin and topical medications can be irritant. Isotretinoin can be used in resistant cases of rosacea. Unfortunately, the majority of studies on rosacea treatments are at high or unclear risk of bias. A recent Cochrane review found that only topical metronidazole, azelaic acid, and oral doxycycline (40 mg) had some evidence to support their effectiveness in moderate to severe rosacea and concluded that further well-designed, adequately-powered randomised controlled trials are required. In our practice, we evaluate our patients for the presence of two possible triggers, Helicobacter pylori infection and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. When they are present we use adapted antibiotic protocols. If not, we use oral metronidazole or oral tetracycline to treat papulopustolar rosacea. We also look for Demodex folliculorum infestation. When Demodex concentration is higher than 5/cm(2) we use topical crotamiton 10% or metronidazole.     

Onychomycosis: a review

Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of the nail, causing discoloration and thickening of the affected nail plate, and is the most common nail infection worldwide. Onychomycosis was initially thought to be predominantly caused by dermatophytes; however, new research has revealed that mixed infections and those caused by non-dermatophyte moulds (NDMs) are more prevalent than previously thought, especially in warmer climates. Microscopy and fungal culture are the gold standard techniques for onychomycosis diagnosis, but high false-negative rates have pushed for more accurate methods, such as histology and PCR. As NDMs are skin and laboratory contaminants, their presence as an infectious agent requires multiple confirmations and repeated sampling. There are several treatment options available, including oral antifungals, topicals and devices. Oral antifungals have higher cure rates and shorter treatment periods than topical treatments, but have adverse side effects such as hepatotoxicity and drug interactions. Terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole are most commonly used, with new oral antifungals such as fosravuconazole being evaluated. Topical treatments, such as efinaconazole, tavaborole, ciclopirox and amorolfine have less serious side effects, but also have generally lower cure rates and much longer treatment regimens. New topical formulations are being investigated as faster-acting alternatives to the currently available topical treatments. Devices such as lasers have shown promise in improving the cosmetic appearance of the nail, but due to a high variation of study methods and definitions of cure, their effectiveness for onychomycosis has yet to be sufficiently proven. Recurrence rates for onychomycosis are high; once infected, patients should seek medical treatment as soon as possible and sanitize their shoes and socks. Prophylactic application of topicals and avoiding walking barefoot in public places may help prevent recurrence.     

Update on treatments for erosive vulvovaginal lichen planus

Vulvovaginal lichen planus (VVLP) is a debilitating disease that causes significant pain and psychological distress. Management is made difficult by the chronic course of the disease and its resistance to treatment. While topical steroids have been accepted as the first-line treatment, they fail to achieve symptomatic control in approximately 40% of patients. Second-line therapies include other topical treatments such as calcineurin inhibitors, systemic therapies including oral steroids, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, biologics, and tacrolimus, and procedural options including surgery and dilation, photodynamic therapy, and ultrasound. This review provides an overview of the current treatments and explores the level of evidence supporting each of them.     

Rosai-Dorfman病的治疗新进展

【摘要】 Rosai-Dorfman病又称窦性组织细胞增生症伴巨大淋巴结病,是一种临床上罕见的病因不明的良性自限性组织细胞增生症。本病缺乏特异的治疗方法。治疗首选手术,无法进行手术的患者可以选用局部治疗和系统治疗。局部治疗包括外用糖皮质激素或局部封闭治疗,光动力治疗和激光免疫疗法也是很有前景的局部疗法。传统的系统治疗包括糖皮质激素、免疫调节剂、阿维A等;对CD20阳性的Rosai-Dorfman病,利妥昔单抗是一种新的治疗选择。本文就近年来Rosai-Dorfman病的一些治疗新进展予以综述。     

The effects of topical doxepin on responses to histamine, substance P and prostaglandin E2 in human skin

The tricyclic antidepressant, doxepin, is known to have H₁ and H₂ antihistaminic effects. Recently, 5% doxepin cream has been marketed in the U.S.A. for treatment of eczematous dermatoses. We investigated the effects of topical doxepin treatment on histamine-, substance P-and prostaglandin E₂-(PGE₂) induced responses in the skin of normal and atopic subjects. We compared the effects of topical doxepin with those of the oral antihistamine terfenadine. The weal volume and flare area responses to histamine were significantly reduced by treatment with topical doxepin or oral terfenadine in both normal and atopic subjects (P<0·05). The mean ±SEM percentage reduction in flare area for 10μ/site of histamine in non-atopics and atopics was 48±8% and 60±17% with terfenadine, and 54 ± 12% and 81 ± 4% with topical doxepin, respectively. The mean percentage reduction in weal volume for the same dose of histamine in non-atopics and atopics was 70 ± 9% and 63 ± 16% with terfenadine, and 96 ± 2% and 89 ± 6% with topical doxepin, respectively. The flare but not the weal response to substance P was inhibited by both treatments in all subjects (P<0·05). The mean ±SEM percentage reduction in flare area for 200 pmol/site of substance P in non-atopics and atopics was 53 ± 10% and 73 ±4% with terfenadine, and 74 ± 7% and 75 ± 4% with topical doxepin, respectively. The cutaneous responses to PGE₂ were not affected by either drug. The inhibitory effects of doxepin were as great as those of terfenadine, and doxepin had a significantly greater effect than terfenadine in inhibiting the weal response to histamine and flare response to substance P in normal volunteers (P<0·05). There was no significant difference between atopics and non-atopics in the percentage reduction of cutaneous responses by oral terfenadine or topical doxepin. Marked sedation occurred in three of the first 10 subjects treated with topical doxepin, necessitating a reduction in dosage for the remaining six subjects. In summary, topical doxepin was as effective as, and sometimes more effective than, a standard dose of oral terfenadine in the inhibition of histamine-induced and axon-reflex-mediated cutaneous responses. The marked sedative effect may limit its clinical use in some patients.     

Can a simple outpatient‐based treatment be used to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis in young children? A Critically Appraised Topic

A 5‐year‐old boy from rural Afghanistan presented with a 1‐year history of a skin lesion on his left knee, confirmed by polymerase chain reaction to be cutaneous leishmaniasis (Leishmania tropica). Conventional treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis involves intravenous or intralesional pentavalent antimonials. The aim of this Critically Appraised Topic (CAT) is therefore to determine what alternative effective but less painful treatments (such as oral or topical therapies) can be used to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis in children. Embase and PubMed were searched for ‘cutaneous leishmania*’ AND ‘treatment’ AND ‘children’ in August 2014. All abstracts from April 2008 to August 2014 were reviewed. This search period was chosen to follow on from the Cochrane reviews on Old World and American leishmaniasis. Five randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria and have been included in this CAT. The study design and reporting quality in most of the trials included in both Cochrane reviews was found to be poor, and neither Cochrane review investigated the effect of patient age on response to treatment. This CAT identified two nonpainful treatments, topical paromomycin and oral miltefosine, whose effective use in children is supported in the literature. However, both of these treatments are currently unlicensed in the U.K. Our patient was successfully treated with miltefosine 20 mg twice daily for 4 weeks, leading to good resolution of the leishmaniasis plaque but with residual scarring.